Comments by "KGS" (@kgs2280) on "Megyn Kelly shocks right wingers, says Russell Brand seems guilty as hell" video.

  1.  @relaxedsack1263 Yes, and that is why they DID find him guilty of sexual assault.
    2
  2.  @BatDad-qu4fo Exactly. Plus the fact that it happened something like 30 years ago. Generally after a traumatic event in your life you’re trying to just comprehend what just happened, and it would be extremely rare that someone would remember the specific date it happened. Plus, most people wouldn’t want to remember the date and would mentally block it, unless the victim had proof (and I don’t think they had DNA tests 30 years ago), and immediately knew they were going to sue the person, which she didn’t because back then she wouldn’t have had a snowball’s chance in h*ll of winning because social attitudes were different (slightly) and he was a “darling” of New York society in those days.
    1
  3.  @stephendelwiche3949 But he WAS found guilty of sexual assault (look it up if you don’t believe me), and only because they couldn’t prove whether he used his fingers (which is still sexual assault) or his penis, and which the judge later said was “effectively” the same as rape in New York.
    1
  4.  @PFA... It was in civil court instead of criminal court, but he WAS found guilty, by the jury, of sexual assault.
    1
  5.  @stephendelwiche3949 Nope, there was a friend of Carroll’s who said that she called her and told her about it right after he did it, plus there were another couple (not sure how many, but two or three I think) who said he also sexually assaulted them as well, and that counts in court because it shows attacker’s general behavior.
    1
  6.  @JohnSmith-zo6ir Even if Russell Brand did have hundreds, or even thousands, of women who would love to have sex with him, that doesn’t mean that ALL the women in his orbit did, and some guys get turned on by the thought of getting the one he has to chase, or “hunt”. One woman who said he raped her said he pinned her up against a wall, and she said, “NO” very clearly, more than once (three times, I think), but he kept on, clearly not respecting her wishes, or completely ignoring her humanity, or her personal RIGHT to say “NO”. Plus he is a fairly large and very strong man, so she couldn’t get away. And the BBC looking for victims is in no way a “witch hunt”. It’s pretty standard journalistic practice when they want to do a documentary about a case, and, of course they hire actresses to play the role of the victims. Have you ever watched a true crime story? That’s how it’s done. Also, in the REAL witch hunts, especially the ones that went on for 200 years in Europe and killed over 200,000 women, many of whom were called witches simply because they knew various herbs that would help a sick person feel better, say, with a bad cold, so they decided to call her a witch. The women they called witches, often after receiving a powerful flogging or lashing, which ripped the skin off their backs and/or legs, were often tied to a wooden A-frame parallel to the pole they set fire to with branches and pieces of wood, and when the fire got big enough they pushed the top of the A-frame into it so that it jammed the woman’s face and body and highly flammable clothes straight into the fire, face first. It must have caused horrific fear and pain to die that way. They also “just” tied some of them to a post at the bottom of which they had built a fire, and lit the fire and watched the women get fried and roasted from the legs up to her face and head. Others were simply hung, and others were drowned. Yeah, real fun stuff, right? So, is that the kind of “witch hunt” you think Russell brand (or even Donald trump, who always claims that the courts and lawyers after him for actual crimes committed, is a “witch hunt”) are facing? Somehow I don’t think so. They in no way are facing being flogged and burned at the stake. Tell me you still think it’s a REAL witch hunt. As for the Tate brothers, the women they were using as mistresses and sex toys were threatened with physical punishment if they said a single word to the police about what was really going on, so, of course they denied it in front of the Tates. However, some called the police from outside phones to place the complaints against the Tates. The women were also passed around like so much cattle to other men in their prostitution ring for big bucks. The cops proved the prostitution ring was happening, and that’s why they got arrested, fined and jailed. So, why do you automatically support the men in these cases, and always claim the women are lying? Is it really just “bro club” feelings, or are you dreaming of joining one of these rings so that you can have all YOUR sexual fantasies made real? I also don’t understand why you still do it even when the Tate brothers were found guilty of running a prostitution ring in their (Romania’s?) court of law. And it’s very likely that Russell Brand will be found guilty as well, after they find that handful, at least, of women who will speak their truth. Will you continue to support those guilty men? Do you still support trump even though he’s been found guilty of sexual assault (which the judge in the case is the same thing as rape, as well as having 4 indictments and 91 charges? If so, why? I’d be curious to know what your reasons would be. Is it because you simply feel that men are just too good to do those things, and/or because you think all women lie about rape, and that all women are just stupid and exist solely to prop up and have sex with you and other men, slaves, basically, sexual slaves? You know men do those things (no, not all men, of course), so why would you defend monsters like that? I’m just really curious.
    1
  7.  @stephendelwiche3949  But, wasn’t “that place” his home? And a woman (who also went to a rape crisis center, AND A FEW FRIENDS” are a few more “witnesses” than one of him.
    1
  8.  @JohnSmith-zo6ir  Yes, because women ALWAYS lie about rape, right? (I hope you can tell that’s sarcasm). Do we really all know the “evils” of “She said”? What about the evils “we all know” about “He said”? Men ALWAYS say they didn’t do it when so many times it is found during discovery that he did (just like Bill Clinton said he didn’t do it, then later admitted he did?) And other men ALWAYS stick up for the men.
    1