Comments by "Simon Hool" (@simonhool3073) on "Business Insider" channel.

  1. Shouting at a submarine, really effective that is...
    664
  2. Look at London, all Olympic venues are still in heavy use by the public 5 years on. They aren’t expense to use either for the public. An investment such as the Olympic isn’t primarily designed to make instant profit in the first place.
    177
  3. Americans are not good as the Europeans at car reviews.
    18
  4. Diego Hurtado to make money
    6
  5. Richard J Samuelson Won’t make a difference considering this is at sea...
    4
  6. MATIX Not a fully submersible vessel.
    3
  7. Raj Dehoo No they don’t.
    3
  8. Matthew Marcum Not really because the submarine didn’t stop or respond
    3
  9. Danny Morgan Any evidence to prove what I said is “Gibberish and delusion...”? Leaving the EU or not our economy won’t disappear as you say, it may shrink or increase either way but it won’t disappear as you say even those who voted to remain know our economy won’t disappear. Seems odd to lash back with no evidence or facts or even correct grammar.
    3
  10. Alex 1218 It’s not stealing, it’s tax. Hundreds of thousands of people, who aren’t in the Royal Family, wear fancy clothes everyday. What’s your point?
    2
  11. Isaac Gecas This aircraft carrier isn’t named after the Queen, do your research before you comment a load of bollocks.
    2
  12. OMGz1122 Becaus it’s not a full submersible. They knew the crew Hispanic through questioning and origin and navigation of the vessel.
    2
  13. Pet Prove it
    2
  14. Raf Abd Not all, more from the Crown State.
    2
  15. Nomad 64 Do you know that it has paid itself back from the initial investment and the Royal Family contribute more than they cost.
    2
  16. Nomad 64 Given back to the taxpayer by increasing the strength of the economy, increasing our global position and influence.
    2
  17. Nomad 64 No we couldn’t, they contribute more than cost. That is fact.
    2
  18. If a country isn’t going to make use of the Olympic development, like London has, then why should they host it again. Waste of money then.
    1
  19. Zenn Lozanno You’re so funny...
    1
  20. Benefitted the London and British economy, as well as the local economy.
    1
  21. SoyLeroy2003 Because Greece can afford that.
    1
  22. John Ikot They don’t always.
    1
  23. markman63 Explain London then.
    1
  24. 100 subs without videos sub now Evidence?
    1
  25. sanket Kumar Explain London
    1
  26. sanket Kumar LA has made a profit from both Olympic Games and London’s games have seen vast improvements in the local community. If a country invests right they can make it viable.
    1
  27. sanket Kumar Rio had the opportunity and the money to continue the infrastructure so it can be used by all but they left it and instead increased division but pushing poor people away when they could have benefitted.
    1
  28.  @sanketkumar8040  Rio could afford it, VOX did a video how they had enough money bu instead used it for the wrong reasons. In London and LA which are both wealthy, the infrastructure was used afterwards and is still today including the accommodation for all incomes. Jut research Rio and you'll see.
    1
  29. freen greg Explain London then.
    1
  30. freen greg Poor analogy, Rio had the opportunity to thrive after the Olympics but instead the interests were towards the rich people government officials who segregated poor people nearby instead of investing the money that they had for the areas to remain open. If you know you can’t support the games afterwards don’t bother bidding.
    1
  31. Jiang Cheung Like your English.
    1
  32. The God It isn’t the olympics or feeding people. There is enough other money to solve that, it’s down to government. The olympics role isn’t to sort that.
    1
  33. KendrickMan They weren’t conned, they didn’t spend any money on the venues afterwards. A video from VOX points this out,
    1
  34. Crazytastie There is already enough money available for research, intact the olympics is a large area for research. It isn’t the olympics or research.
    1
  35. Crazytastie Explain why counties bid to host it then?
    1
  36. Crazytastie Rio had the opportunity to thrive after the olympics but threw it away but not investing any more and segregating poorer people when they could have benefited from the transport and better housing.
    1
  37. Trickster Mixer The ship isn’t named after the queen, google it.
    1
  38. steve ed Ha, how out of date are you?
    1
  39. Alex Any evidence to back that up?
    1
  40. Love Story Damming opinion there...
    1
  41. Jtv6 Yo need to look at the definition of corrupt first, corrupt vs high cut.
    1
  42. Dee B Often, like London, more houses are built helping poorer people
    1
  43. Because Greece have the money for that.
    1
  44. Slartibartfast Because that isn’t cheap and easy to maintain and secure.
    1
  45. Eli Egbert The Olympics isn’t 99% adverts.
    1
  46. Bill Whitman Olympics costs more and more each year so wouldn’t work.
    1
  47. Midnight Cravings Thanks for your opinion...
    1
  48. Anthony Olmo The costs would be astronomical to build then maintain it every 4 years.
    1
  49. D C You know you’re loosing the argument when you go off topic about the history of the monarchy, which has no bearing on the topic of conversation being cost.
    1
  50. Kenny McCormick IOC isn’t a corporation.
    1
  51. Kenny McCormick No shit Sherlock. The IOC isn’t a business, it’s a charity.
    1
  52. Or be like London and create housing as a result, the same amount of housing wouldn’t have been built if the olympics wasn’t there.
    1
  53. Dániel Deák Just you.
    1
  54. The Great CooLite They do.
    1
  55. h KELLY Because Greece can afford that...
    1
  56. Elif Denizer Every year?! Who’s going to fund this and maintain it and secure it?
    1
  57. Truth Matters It won’t bankrupt Tokyo.
    1
  58. Declan1337 Nufc Low chance, waiting list for most specialisations.
    1
  59. William Peckham 8 million would hardly make a difference on this scale.
    1
  60. William Peckham How would G4S improve health? Aren’t they a security firm?
    1
  61.  @williampeckham9838  Ha no problem we all do it lol
    1
  62. sheeja boby Because hotels don’t cost money...
    1
  63. America and China and France and all other countries would have been in the same place at one point.
    1
  64. tm eafd Hundreds of millions yes, maybe if you watched you’d see...
    1
  65. jonathan Shouting didn’t make a difference, you are the only one to miss the point here.
    1
  66. Carter Douglas Alright grandad
    1
  67. John Daniel There are some very cold places in South America.
    1
  68. Dean Pan Because Greece can afford that...
    1
  69. Joel Brace No, look at London
    1
  70. Look at the viewing figures then.
    1
  71. Alice Lu London wasn’t.
    1
  72. some C**t No it’s isn’t, look it up and you will learn something.
    1
  73.  @bobbyhill5067  Yes it is
    1
  74. Comic Guy What’s your point?
    1
  75. Sweetheart Okay How about no.
    1
  76. ayanna worthen In some counties.
    1
  77. Raheema Muskan So who’s going to pay for that and maintain it and secure it?
    1
  78. secret One company that operates in Europe doesn’t represent the rest. This has nothing to do with the Second World War, stick to the topic. Yes America did help in World War Two however that has no relevance. I don’t see you jumping up and down about British intelligence that foiled the liquid bomb plot but sure you keep arguing the past and going off topic.
    1
  79. secret Did you read the article? It states the other companies are “alleged” and that it’s a possibility not proven all. Tell me to get educated when you can’t string a sentence together or even read.
    1
  80. gustavo garcia You have evidence to prove that athletes are just in it for the money.
    1
  81. Viet Bui If you don’t manage it yes
    1
  82. Guri Singh Look at London.
    1
  83. What you looking at Because that will be cheaper...
    1
  84. loganbaileysfunwithtrains Nothing to do with it.
    1
  85. Explain.
    1
  86. Danny Morgan Just because a country doesn’t have an empire doesn’t mean that they can’t build aircraft carriers. Russia, America and France all have aircraft carriers but no large or medium sized empire. Proving that your empire comment is completely useless. Why and how will Russia sink the carrier? The Russians have had major problems with their carrier including it breaking down constantly, loosing its jets at sea, and a requirement to have a tug with it all the time. It’s not as if QE will have no defence systems at all as you imply through the sinking comment. Russia aren’t going to declare war on us anytime soon if even at all, even Putin isn’t interested as he said the other day.
    1
  87. Tom Landon The Olympics wasn’t the downfall of the Greek economy.
    1
  88. Nomad 64 Costs the tax payer less than a pound a year, such a difference on your disposable income that is...
    1
  89. justiady kalvianto Hundreds of millions of people watch the olympics, any facts to say no one does.
    1
  90. Gecho Gechev Because Greece can afford that... Olympics don’t become cheaper.
    1
  91. Allezallez London has hosted this decade already.
    1
  92. Stelios Kapet You think Greece can afford that?
    1
  93. The public were benefited from the olympics in London.
    1