Comments by "Cestarian Inhabitant" (@cestarianinhabitant5898) on "TED-Ed" channel.

  1. Can I get like a TL;DR?
    2
  2. A big flaw in how schools are structured then. I wonder if lying down is better though.
    2
  3. The answer is to swerve as minimally as possible (for a near miss) in the direction opposite of where the objects are falling to; and the reason this isn't a problem is because if most people are using self driving cars they should be able to cross communicate which means whatever is in the way of the direction that the car swerves in will react to avoid collission and if that were to cause another collision this would be repeated until there are no more oncoming collisions. This "dilemma" is vastly underestimating the capabilities of AI including the speed at which decisions can be made, it could potentially decide to drive further away from the car with the objects on it so that it has more time to brake and avoid accidents, and the speed at which it can send messages to nearby self-driving cars. If we had a mandatory feature in all cars and motorcycles to have a self-driving AI that can override the manual driver for any such collisions, this could never be a problem. I.e. to solve this we have to reverse the current situation of autonomous driving, instead of self-driving requiring a human observer, human driving should require an AI observer. At least on public roads. In other words, I think this video is completely idiotic, a dilemma created by someone who falsely thinks he understands what he's talking about.
    1