Comments by "Flook D" (@flookd5516) on "Sabine Hossenfelder"
channel.
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
"Van Allan radiation belts"
With adequate shielding and passing through the weak periphery at speed; the astronauts radiation exposure was the equivalent to a couple of X-rays.
"the immensely low pressures of space"
"How did the space craft not get ripped apart due to the low pressure of space"
The difference between 1 atm pressure and vacuum is 1 atm pressure, a paltry amount; planes handle about 20% that and gas cylinders contain about 100 atm pressure. Not a problem .
"How did they land on the moon without causing a massive crater"
The bulk of the deceleration was done at high altitude, the landing modules ran at about 1/4 power until prior to landing and shut off immediately prior to touchdown. You're assuming the reverse of a Saturn V take-off that starts from stationary and has to produce the power to accelerate a huge mass upwards against Earth's gravity. The landing modules were already moving slowly, had very little mass compared to a Saturn V and were in lunar gravity.
"what battery technology did they have to run their life support systems"
Hydrogen fuel cells for most things, silver oxide-zinc batteries for the Landing Module.
"How did they cause the camera film not to be destroyed by radiation."
Lead-lined containers.
"earths curvature can not be measured, observed or detected"
And yet is routinely measured, observed and detected. That FE'ers turn a blind eye to how this is done does not magically make it impossible.
"no mathematical equations are conducted to facilitate for earth’s curvature"
A 25,000 mile circumference means 360/25000 = 0.0144 degrees/mile. Each individual section is set for level at that locality; the angle difference between sections is less than the corrections needed for the terrain.
"The 8 miles ^2 by the distance is totally disregarded"
Given that it is not for calculating curvature one would hope it is ignored.
"Please look into this further. "
Why don't you? None of the above answers are secret or rely on arcane mystical knowledge so why don't you know them?
"one always observes the same Stella Constellation throughout the year"
No, one does not. That is how the zodiac system comes to have 12 constellations that indicate how their presence changes.
"want is occurring is due to electromagnetism, pressure and buoyancy."
A Faraday cage has no effect so it isn't EM, buoyancy is dependent on gravity so it isn't that and air pressure is due to gravity, i.e., no gravity, no pressure difference.
"second law of thermodynamics explains a pressurised system cannot be next to a vacuum without a Barrier"
No, it does not. A pressure gradient can be maintained by a force countering the expansion due to pressure, e.g., gravity. FE'ers have yet to explain why there is decreasing pressure with increasing altitude when they're claiming equal pressure throughout their dome (of which they have no evidence itself).
Why don't you try learning something instead of ignorantly parroting stuff?
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@yestervue4697 "Then I was shown transcontinental flight maps/routes, all these curves in odd directions seeming to avoid the ocean"
You're prepared to believe in a millenia-long, extremely expensive and totally pointless conspiracy but it didn't cross your mind that someone could cherry-pick flights for their demonstration? Direct flights between the southern continents cross Pacific & Atlantic oceans (and, no, the existence of indirect routes does not preclude the existence of direct routes not does the current limitations due to Covid mean the direct flights never existed). Also, what would be a straight line on a globe appears as a curve when projected onto a flat surface.
"They are straight on there!"
Somebody draws a straight line between two points, tells you that's where the plane goes and you believe because you are gullible. Doesn't occur to you that they cherry-pick the locations and flights? You don't ask what about the flights in the southern hemisphere that would be beyond the flight range of aircraft on a FE map?
"I investigated MUCH deeper for a year and found no proof for globe earth"
Motion of the sun, horizons, angle to Polaris, two celestial poles: you can check all for yourself. Try actually doing it rather than listening to FE ignorance & incredulity. The curvature is measurable with a land surveyor's theodolite though I imagine you will claim they are rigged by the <insert bogeymen>. I know you will deny photographs, preferring to believe single-frame shots taken with an analogue must have been done with CGI several decades before CGI existed, and will ignore the ISS passing over head, preferring to believe it a balloon that has somehow remained aloft for 20 years while unaffected by ambient weather. So, be novel and try explaining how the FE fits to observations: how does the sun a constant angular diameter and angular velocity when the FE predicts they vary; how does the sun rise & set; why is there a horizon when the FE predicts several hundred miles vision that disappears in a haze; how are there two celestials poles when FE says there is only one; why are different constellations visible in the southern hemisphere; why does the angle to Polaris disagree with that predicted by the FE; why can't any of you produce accurate maps when you now accurate distance?
The moon does not have to outrun the Earth's rotation for a solar eclipse to work. You're thinking the of the change in angle when the key is the speed with which the moon moves out of alignment. Do you really think that only FE'ers think about these things?
"the model failures in action"
That is the inability of the author to get his head around diagrams. Given the relative sizes sun, moon & Earth and the distances separating them it isn't practical to produce a to scale model: distance to the sun 93 million miles, umbra 166 miles.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4