Comments by "Gort" (@gort8203) on "Black Hawk chopper was on annual proficiency training flight, Secretary Hegseth says" video.

It's not a "training path", it's a standard routing." Flights that are not coded operational are coded training, but that doesn't mean its a student pilot. It's usually a fully qualified pilot just getting recurrent proficiency.
8
It's not a "training path", it's a standard routing. Flights that are not coded operational are coded training, but that doesn't mean it's a student pilot. It's usually a fully qualified pilot just getting recurrent proficiency.
6
It's not a "training path", its a standard routing." Flights that are not coded operational are coded training, but that doesn't mean its a student pilot. It's usually a fully qualified pilot just getting recurrent proficiency.
2
It's not a "training path", its a standard routing." Flights that are not coded operational are coded training, but that doesn't mean its a student pilot. It's usually a fully qualified pilot just getting recurrent proficiency.
1
@untilvalhalla7854 Obviously something went wrong, but it is not because it was a training flight. Most flights include training. Fully qualified crewmembers need practice. The military could come up with a different terms for non-operational flights just to prevent this common misunderstanding among civilians.
1
It's not a "training path", its a standard routing." Flights that are not coded operational are coded training, but that doesn't mean its a student pilot. It's usually a fully qualified pilot just getting recurrent proficiency.
1
It's not a "training path", its a standard routing." Flights that are not coded operational are coded training, but that doesn't mean its a student pilot. It's usually a fully qualified pilot just getting recurrent proficiency.
1