Comments by "Robert Coggeshall" (@robertcoggeshall3071) on "Nature on PBS" channel.

  1. Still not proven either way.
    28
  2.  @ice-coldspear9193  that's why it's called the Long Walk.
    12
  3. You saw a guy walking 2 dogs.
    7
  4. I'd say a few, not most. And usually easy to tell.
    7
  5. Giganto would have to be ground dwelling at that weight. The idea of a giant orang that can't climb seems suspect.
    5
  6. They claimed to see 2 large yeti, dark, not white.
    3
  7. Giganto isn't proven to be the inspiration for bigfoot or yeti. No idea if it was bipedal.
    3
  8. Santa doesn't leave 18 inch boot tracks.
    2
  9. Grover Krantz thought a bipedal body made more sense due to the spread of the lower jaw. Much wider than a gorilla. That means the neck was below the skull, not hung forward.
    2
  10.  @PaulBowman-y1r  idk, traveling with 2 coyotes? There was a report in Ohio of one traveling with 2 pumas.
    2
  11. Not proven.
    2
  12. Not proven that at all.
    2
  13. If it was bipedal.
    2
  14.  @TylerRakstis  most look humanlike.
    2
  15. I doubt many drunks are thinking about bigfoot.
    2
  16. I'd say bigfoot and other apemen might be evolved australos or paranthropus.
    2
  17. Pg film proves they exist. All over the world.
    2
  18. Giganto is possible, but I doubt it had humanlike feet. Only the human lineage had it. Bigfoot more likely would be a large evolved australo or paranthropus.
    1
  19. Maybe, maybe not.
    1
  20. Those are bare feet, not snow shoes.
    1
  21.  @Ose-here  not really.
    1
  22. The Shipton print is not from a sherpa barefoot, lol 😆.
    1
  23. Lol, no.
    1
  24. They're theorizing it didn't die out.
    1
  25.  @sarbo2335  a lot of reports of really huge apemen, so it's possible.
    1
  26. It went extinct fairly recently. Could be the source of some really large apemen sightings.
    1
  27. One species lived in the Himalayan foothills. No idea if it was red.
    1
  28. I think that's a fallacy.
    1
  29. Several lower jaws and a thousand teeth were found by accident.
    1
  30. Doubtful. Doesn't have similar teeth.
    1
  31. It doesn't mean bear.
    1
  32. The photo is a left foot.
    1
  33.  @frankrizzo5958  the big toe is on the right side. That's a left, lol. Loved the Jerky boys, btw.
    1
  34. Lol, that's a left foot. The big toe is on the right side.
    1
  35. There's no arch. Look at your own feet.
    1
  36.  @frankrizzo5958  arches were only a recent evolved trait. They aren't evident in old fossil footprints. I meant for you to look at the toes of your feet, clueless, to see that yeti track is a left foot. Loved your jerky boys albums, btw.
    1
  37.  @frankrizzo5958  I have the most common sense. Arches were a homo sapiens development. Other species needed larger flat feet to handle their weight. Early australos didn't have arches. Arches evolved much later.
    1
  38. It's too old. We've been able to get dna from more modern human relatives.
    1
  39. It's teeth aren't a modern human.
    1
  40. No, there are several lower jaws and over 1000 teeth found, and spread out over southeast Asia. There were large and smaller specimens, same genus.
    1
  41. The Shipton tracks were of a biped, not a bear. They actually jumped across to another spot. Bears can't jump.
    1
  42. Yeah, but jumping would require them to be on all fours and leave quadrupedal prints. So you're wrong. I've never seen a bear jump, lol.
    1
  43.  @blobrana8515  I know what bear tracks look like. The back paw looks the most humanlike, but a bear would have to jump quadrupedally. I've never seen a nature documentary with them jumping. The Yeti tracks were a biped.
    1
  44. Lots of large bones and skulls of giant people in America. Could be bigfoot, but the museums can't seem to locate them.
    1
  45. Had to live on the ground, so it's possible.
    1
  46. In snow, it's a lot harder to tell bear from yeti. The Shipton print could be an overstepped bear track. No claws though..
    1
  47. That was the best print. Yes there was a trail, and supposedly his guides were impressed how the creature navigated the terrain.
    1
  48. Man-bear probably means manlike creature bear size.
    1
  49. Doubt trail cameras cover much of North America.
    1
  50. Pg film proves they exist. Several other films show creatures 8 ft.
    1