Comments by "RCM RCM" (@rcmrcm3370) on "The Grayzone" channel.

  1. There is a logical reason for the request to do an AIDS test on Assange. First one has to wait at least 6 months between possible infection and knowing that the results are negative. Secondly, armed with the knowledge of a positive test on the vector, the prophylactic use of antiviral medication can often stop an infection from completing. Because antiviral medications have serious complications, no one should just take them without a reasonable concern. A more significant question maybe Whether or not Julian Assange actually engaged in unprotected sex. Perhaps the girls were fed a story CIA that Assange was infected with HIV and therefore should go to the police and request such a test. That they should mention the sex was unprotected so that they police would act. When they realize that this was more complicated than they expected they got cold feet. How's that for a conspiracy theory. Certainly more reasonable than the one the CIA has been using on the western press.
    2
  2. Meh, both parties back much the same policy, As to Trump may have had one or two correct ideas, but he was a terrible political player, more use to corporate dictatorship which is absolute, than running bureaucracy that he can't fire. He was eaten alive.
    2
  3. Better than Cookie Monster? U unfaithful monsters are all the same.
    2
  4. I believe that is Arron's point, his show is called pushback, he pushes back against idiots. Better watch elsewhere if you want cheerleading.
    2
  5. ✌✌
    2
  6. ❤❤
    2
  7. Russia only has Euros off-shore, and eventually they will be paid back or Europe will freeze, so no worries. Also makes for great wedge with USA.
    2
  8. She worked for the World Bank on microloans to enslave the poor with debt. Nuf said.
    2
  9. Robert has a point on "corrupt but democratically elected" . Cannot the same be said about Obama? So unless you're going to preface every statement about every elected president for every country, then don't do this for Ukraine.
    2
  10. Kapo. Always a Kapo.
    2
  11. After your first two sentences I could swear every word where you wrote Putin or Russia could have been substituted with USA and it would be actually more truthful
    2
  12. 👍✊
    2
  13. Read Super Imperialism by prof Michael Hudson
    2
  14. Source?
    2
  15. That too... Damn silly MSM.
    2
  16. 😪
    2
  17. Gaggle Google censorship
    2
  18. :face-purple-wide-eyes:
    2
  19. How to protect Lockheed Martin owners from democracy....
    2
  20.  @truthseeker9958  and the US was Stronger, slightly stronger. Funny thing is the more the US spends the weaker its military gets because more money attracts more corruption.
    2
  21. Mister, no one has the time to read the encyclopedia to you much less take you from k to 12.
    2
  22. 👍🫣
    2
  23. Renouncing first use doesn't necessarily mean spending less on nuclear weapons. Renouncing first use could be an excuse to expand into all kinds of nuclear weapons systems including nuclear weapons in space (dramatic acceleration). The rationale Biden Admin weapon salesmen would use is simple: since we can't be the first to launch, therefore we have two haveeven more weapons in order to ensure enough survive for retaliation. It sounds stupid, but also sounds like it would work in terms of convincing the average voter in the American populace to throw their children under the bus in order to buy more weapons.
    2
  24. Good analysis, and a balance on the noise. Thank you guys.
    2
  25. And failed miserably at it too, spending went down every year
    2
  26. Boy, this guys skin is white, much whiter than the average for Venezuela. Hardly from the working class, or even most of the middle class. He definitely is an old oligarchy family.
    2
  27. Gives a lot of verbiage in a complaint about verbiage. Jesus, they'll never run out of people for the Darwin's award
    2
  28.  @xiavosh  Right now it's the British American Gulf. "Gulf of Iran", "Gulf of Ajam", "Gulf of Basra", "Arabian Gulf", "Persian-Arabian Gulf", "Gulf of Fars", and "Farsi Gulf", that's all old history stuff.
    2
  29. You should blame Apple for that, or whatever you used to dumb yourself down.
    2
  30. Use view newest first option.
    2
  31. 🥵
    2
  32. You mean like Julian Assange?
    2
  33. It's only the euro reserves, Putin knows those will eventually be paid out, otherwise Europe will freeze to death. No USD.
    2
  34. He's just a cocaine addict with the hand stuffed up his backside to control him like a sock puppet
    2
  35. I see, you're saying that the rape victim needs to move in with the rapist.
    2
  36.  @thegalaxylab  I don't think he'd' hit it off with George Orwell, who played both sides of the game, Imperialist as a youth and anti-Imperialist as a mature man. "Pacifism is objectively pro-fascist."
    2
  37.  @simonrodriguez4685  bravo, you know his ravings. I was expecting real fireworks, but he softshoe'd his way off the stage while still signaling to his corporate masters his loyalty. The spice must flow.
    2
  38. Don't forget, Hillary had to throw shade on Trump about Russia because she had already sold one quarter of the u.s. uranium deposits to a Russian Corporation in return for large donations to the Clinton Foundation. Her own campaign advisors recognize that this was going to be a problem in the election so they had to go first and throw shade on Trump. This comes right out of Machiavelli
    2
  39. ❤
    2
  40. How many advertisements has GE, Raytheon, Lockheed-Martin, etc purchased on Newsweek, under the reasonable assumption that they'll keep employing hawks like William Arkin? It's clear from his career path that around 2002 he sold out, ie started taking "public speaking/consultant" money, then was hired a few years after at Newsweek on that recommendation. So, my guess is he got divorced around 2002.
    2
  41. Not from China to Europe, but from Asia to Europe.
    2
  42. Anything evidence besides the number of hairs on your ass as evidence that the treaties are unequal?
    2
  43.  @redsox7897  in that case is it necessary to state that as a opening clause to every pronouncement?
    2
  44. Follow the money. Anyone paying u?
    2
  45. That would depopulate the USA if they successfully enforced that definition. It's insubordination, and that usually only sticks to enlisted men and very junior officers with no family name. If you are Douglas MacArthur, they invite you to Congress to give a speech on your forced retirement to undercut the presidency. Truman asked the joint chief of staff if he could fire MacArthur, civilian control my foot. That really ended when Eisenhower retired, and even he wasn't so sure how much control he really had.
    2
  46. Sanctions and blockades increased, and unreported bombings by USA proxies increased.
    2
  47. I wonder what he would have done if you had raised Israel arming the salafi murder machine.
    2
  48. Aaron and guest are naïve if they think Zelensky ment to keep his campaign promise. Does Joe Biden keep his campaign promises? Kolomoski owns/owned Zelenski lock stock and barrel. Kolomoski is also the founding funder / bag man of Azov, so it's obvious he had no interest in peace. This was just a scam to get his man over the finish line in front of all the other oligarchs puppets who were also in the election. Zelensky strung along the Russian speaking voters, and then sold them out to moneyed interests just like any other politician. All the rest of the stuff was just posturing so that he wouldn't look like the evil screwball he is.
    2
  49. Hillary Clinton while Secretary of State allow the sale of uranium deposits in the United States to Russian corporations in return for donations to the Clinton Foundation. She was afraid as was her campaign that Trump would dig up this information and use it against her so they decided to smear him first in order to help discount any attack he used on them. The idea that Hillary Clinton was tough on the Russians is just another one of these smokescreens.
    2
  50. 😢😢
    2