Comments by "TheSuperappelflap" (@TheSuperappelflap) on "fern" channel.

  1. 3
  2. 2
  3. 2
  4. 1
  5.  @connorcrowley1  Thats because Amsterdam is, after Rotterdam, the most car-centric city in the country. In any other city far less people will own cars. First of all, you cant drive anywhere, and secondly, you cant park anywhere on the street and parking garages are very expensive. In Amsterdam for some reason you can still drive your car along the canals in many areas in the city center. Most other cities removed cars from the city centers decades ago. If you want to talk about urbanism, dont take Amsterdam as an example for the Netherlands. Its not typical. Take a city like Utrecht or Groningen, or The Hague. Amsterdam is the least safe city to bike anywhere. Its bike infrastructure is bad, unsafe, and 40 years behind modern design guidelines. Plus, there are hordes of stoned tourists everywhere so good luck getting through anywhere. Also, Amsterdam is a giant tourist trap. Dutch people dont live there. Expats and air bnb guests live there. So anything that happens in Amsterdam, has nothing to do with the rest of the country. Manhattan generates wealth because its a metropolis with the largest financial sector of any city in the world. Wall street. We dont have anything like that in the Netherlands, the closest comparable city would be London. Therefore comparing Manhattan to anywhere in the Netherlands is also useless. Street space allocation is not independent of density. Cities that ban cars can be 20-30% denser than cities that allow cars, because there is no need for wide roads and parking space, thus clearing space that can be used for more housing.
    1
  6. 1