Comments by "Hanna Cook" (@hannacook859) on "GBNews" channel.

  1. Imagine if he was a little Muslim boy. BBC would have reported it.
    1100
  2. Freedom of speech doesn't include death threats. Yet it does include the right to point out the truth about a radical violent ideology
    1000
  3. In Scotland calling them criminals is now illegal under the new speech law
    538
  4. Kahn is always either taking credit for things he didnt do, or declaring he is a victim despite his vast power
    351
  5. Thank you for exposing this creep. We need to know what we are facing
    348
  6. So many police officers, and so much confidence when harassing a Christian preacher
    344
  7. Is it cheaper to secure every potential victim than just arresting the criminals?
    319
  8. Why should he apologise? If anything khan should be apologising for his utter refusal to protect the British public and the British values.
    316
  9. Who wants to bet that that guy will not be spoken to by the police?
    284
  10. Easy. IDF didn't perform war crimes, Palestine lead by hamas did. This man seems to support Hamas, he should be stateless
    270
  11. For those who say being anti Israel is not racist. Imagine of someone called for the annihilation of Spain, would that not be racist?
    262
  12. Police are still looking for the phantom of the opera acid attacker migrant The cant find a guy who looks like the phantom of the opera Who can they find?
    253
  13. Colony of what? This is the main land, it can't be a colony too. And the white people are indigenous here
    249
  14. Criminals get more protection than victims Mad anti western terrorists supporters get free speech rights While brave British veterans are told to not go near them and to shut up. Women protesting a police officer who kidnapped raped and murdered a women, got arrested and charged What is going on??? The moral compass is broken
    237
  15. Does he include hate speech against Jews? Didn't think so. Jihad is NOT a call for inner yoga
    222
  16. Anyone still surprised? It is the BBC they have a consistent behaviour, consistent "mistakes" consistent agenda
    214
  17. Can we agree to call BBC "a proscribed broadcasting organisation" ?
    209
  18. It is an utterly unpeaceful call for peace
    202
  19. That is not boycotting, it is just not going because it doesn't meet your requirements for a holiday
    200
  20. Now you know how Israel feels
    195
  21. Starmer has lots to say protecting trans people But nothing to say about jews being arrested for being Jewish.
    190
  22. Police have too much time, they gave up trying to stop crime and have to pass their time somehow
    183
  23. We understood him perfectly and are behind him.
    182
  24. Would bbc forbid attending anti islamaphobia protest?
    178
  25. Wait... Ramadan - fasting Easter - chocolate eggs Which one is more fun?
    161
  26. Just proves it is anti west And nothing to do with Palestine
    144
  27. Would you allow a pro nazi protest? And if not then what is the difference? Where does the line pass?
    137
  28. If the police wont protect the public, maybe call the army.
    135
  29. Children? You dont mean 5 year olds, you mean 18 year old men
    133
  30. Well said. May God protect all babies and mothers including baby kfir, who was stolen with his mother, brother and father. And including all children being bombarded both in Gaza and Israel, congo, Ukraine Syria, Sudan, and worldwide. May God keep them all safe May no civilian be targeted on purpose by anyone, and may they not be harmed wither intentionally or not.
    128
  31. He hasn't defected, he was kicked out for standing for truth and British values
    125
  32. BBC should fund itself and leave the money of the British public alone, and then they can do what they want.
    122
  33. They are also not asylum seekers. They holiday in their home lands That is proof they feel safe there
    122
  34. Freedom of speech is not freedom of harassment
    121
  35. If they are truly calling for peace, put flags of Israel too
    119
  36. Imagine someone called for the annihilation of Belgium Would that be allowed to be projected on big Ben?
    117
  37. The state has no problems stopping many other protests. You wont be allowed to say "from the river to the sea Israel will be free"
    114
  38. You are allowed to call for jihad But not to say that hamas are terrorists
    113
  39. Is this Britain or Iran?
    108
  40. Saying jihad is fine Saying policeman is not I don't understand the world
    106
  41. Hamas is the Palestinian army. Hamas IS Palestine It is ridiculous to separate them It is like saying IDF is not Israel
    105
  42. But they are not calling for a ceasefire are they? They call for Palestine to fight and for Israel to not fire.
    104
  43. Not a word from rishi, starmer or kahn. Speaks volumes about where they stand.
    101
  44. This of course doesn't include hate against Jews Christians White people Women (biological) British people
    100
  45. Until the government start protecting jews in the uk, i simply don't care what they think about Israel, or for that matter any other place in the world. You cant give human rights in your own country, dont lecture others
    99
  46. The officers should be shown, named and shamed.
    98
  47. Exactly! There is no such thing as freedom rapists And kidnapping babies is also not freedom kidnapping
    97
  48. Disagreeing with the ideology of Islam is not discrimination. It is freedom of thought, belief and speech. No one is physically attacking Muslims, they just dont like the idea of people not agreeing with their ideology
    96
  49. It is ironic that they (pro hamas/ Palestine ) are claiming to protest against occupation, and they are occupying every place they go to.
    96
  50. He should be made to live in Rochdale 😂
    95