Comments by "ElephantInTheRoom " (@elephantintheroom5678) on "Midwest Safety" channel.

  1. I think she was probably a teachers aide. I can't see her ever having the self control to study and pass a teaching degree.
    3
  2. "I'mma gonna fug you up!" Boy, have I heard that from a drunk a few times. They're the worst kind of drunk. Me, I very rarely drink, but if I ever drink a bit too much, I start singing. And I NEVER try to drive after drinking. Not even after one.
    1
  3. I mean, I it sure looked guilty for him with those credit cards in the bin. But wow! What a tailor-made excuse the system has made for police to walk in and search your place: the door of weed. I wonder how they prove that they smelled weed? Or can they just allege it!
    1
  4. I didn't know you could be charged with not immediately following a cops orders. If they ever give me an order I'm going to comply and say "you want fries with that, sir"?
    1
  5. Hear that, @ 29:54, when the officer told the other officer that her kid needed to picked up from school "No, that's too bad." They couldn't care less what horrors could happen to a little boy who will have no-one to pick him up from school. The police don't care about people at all. They care about property, only.
    1
  6. $5000 for "battery" of a police officer. Funny that, as soon as they said she was under arrest it was a few seconds before they had cuffs on her, she was face first in the dirt with her cuffed hands behind her back and an officers knee between her shoulder blades. Notice that when the female officer said she had an injured leg and the other officer involved said "that's battery there" that the police camera conveniently didn't actually go down to show the area where the claimed injury was? Funny that. Also notice how an officer was trying to get the woman's friend to say on camera that the woman had "fought" four officers, and didn't she see that, but the woman said "No" she hadn't, so then the police tried to claim she had been "passed out" the whole time, yet she was awake and alert when they went to speak to her? Funny that. They were trying to get a corroborating statement for the judge, because they were worried that they had been too aggressive, especially with that taser.
    1
  7. In other words, they will say you are probably intending to attack them if you happen to walk behind them with a phone, recording them. They will find any excuse to say you were resisting, obstructing or being a threat in order to arrest you. Then it's your word against theirs, and who will most judges believe?
    1
  8. Oh, they can "feel" "resistive tension" ...😂 (with no way of actually measuring or recording it). And they can just allege (with no actual way of recording odour) that they smelled weed in the house and car. See how the "justice" system has set you up to have your rights violated?
    1
  9. She wouldn't be in handcuffs if she had just spoken the words she was saying, instead of yelling them. That gave them the excuse that she was "obstructing" a law enforcement officer. Her words, though, were protected by free speech laws, and they would have had no right to handcuff her if she had only spoken the words.
    1
  10. Well, I feel that at least the judge knew the law, and defended everyone's rights. Well done.
    1
  11. She didn't threaten his wife at all. She said she HOPEd (a violent act) happened to his wife. That is very different from saying she was going to harm his wife. Their slippery twisting of the law is a constant of the "justice" system.
    1
  12.  @jillr.austin1103  Me too.
    1
  13. 😂I can't believe how stupid these sort of people are.
    1