Comments by "" (@umwha) on "Genetics, Dogs, u0026 Pit Bulls: Should Pit Bulls Exist?" video.

Pit bull owners are very very biased about that breed
54
I think Pugs should have been included in this conversation. Pugs don't kill other beings, but they are doomed to short lives of suffering serving no purpose.
26
All roads lead back to eugenics.
19
Anyone who argues non herititism in dogs is wrong, stupid and biased. as a dog fosterer who has had lurchers, border collies, a red spaniel, an English springer, a labrador, Labradoodle, schnauzer - they are innately so so different and very much in line with their breed traits.
13
@Prolute Living things arent ornaments to 'oggle' while they suffer. Causing suffering to an animal by breeding it into diability is not moral
6
@ Yeah. Eu (good) genics (genes). No coercion or anything nasty required.
5
@victorygarden556 I dont beleive a pug could even get close to catching a mouse or rat. Mice and rats are super fast. Even Cats have to work hard to get them.
5
@Prolute I got the comment like from Mom and Dad and you didn’t so there.
4
@josep3776 Genetics and environment are both always at play - nobody is arguing genetics fully determines outcomes regardless of environment.
2
@useraam It’s worse than that. Neither blank slate nor Hobbes are taught at all let alone at middle school!!! I did many years of university sociology and criminology and we only cover the ‘biological’ perspective to criticize it and call it racist . Further, the idea of ‘gender’ and gender identity is taught in primary school and that is essentially a blank slate concept
1