Comments by "sharper68" (@sharper68) on "Valuetainment" channel.

  1. He is not logical, he sounds smart to you but is really just saying things you like couched in a specific way. Logic is not his thing, spin is.
    8
  2. He is a loon who adds a kernel of truth to nonsense spin pre packaged for a specific audience who eats it up. There are other places to get the same information with out it being wrapped up in the silly garbage he packs around actual info. This is proven by the fact he just pulls his factoids out of other news sources.
    3
  3.  @HerobrineTNT  Except he pushes regressive bullshit sold to specific kind of NPC for patrion cash. I see no upside in putting in a leader that people who were helped by "clean up your room" love.
    2
  4.  @leewolf6434  There is a great deal of it out there if you bother to look. I am not saying what I do in a vacuum. I once liked his spin until I dug in and listened closely. He says 1 or 2 good things and then something stupid rolled in to validate a specific audiences preconceptions and make them feel better about their ideas. He makes bad ideas seem smart and there is a real market for it. He just sounds shiny to people hungry for validation of ideas that are currently on the back foot socially and are difficult to defend for most. He is selling a product to them. If I did not have a moral center I would be doing something similar or start my own cult. Unfortunately I would then be stuck surrounded by people I distained because they bought in. Not really worth it for me.
    2
  5.  @Jianju69  Anyone who brags about IQ is either a social dope or not nearly as usefully clever as they pretend they are. Falling for Jorden's feelings propping bullshit is not sharp sparky. Even if turns out you are not personally a moron, you stand in a crowd of them. Apparently you are comfortable being dumbed down to protect your feelings.
    2
  6. He has a TOS on his website too, no one owes you access to their platform.
    2
  7. Then he is out ... he is a clout chasing grifter.
    2
  8. Niels argumet falls on deaf ears.
    1
  9. Tha you looked south and want that mess it says bad things about you
    1
  10. charlie  He has been babbling about the globalism forever too, he should have been banned long ago if they applied their TOS consistently. He lasted longer than he should have.
    1
  11. Specifically the ones that will cost them money are about defamation or putting people in danger. There is one way to solve this issue regulate these providers to guarantee access and and if you break TOS a clear and strait forward transparent process to evaluate and challenge the ban. As it stands they are free to do what they think makes them money and that is of course not always the best thing for the consumers or free speech.
    1
  12. Only to a very very very specific audience.
    1
  13. ​ @cybco  Yep ...
    1
  14.  @martincoates2508  Majority? You are delusional.
    1
  15.  @theavenger3363  Since he is aligned with corrupt monsters like Ted Cruz you can take the concern to the bank, it is a virtual certainty.
    1
  16.  @Gardstyle35  He would never be given power to enact his ideas in Canada, they are not popular with the general public.
    1
  17.  @Jianju69  I once liked him early on, he does not have good arguments at all. He is just saying things you like. That you can not see it speaks to your cognitive issues not mine. Your empty uninformed projection is not very compelling and the dopey simplicity of it speaks to why you like him. I'd say no one ever called you clever for a good reason.
    1
  18.  @Jianju69  You are likely pretty used to it by now. I am sure you will be fine, you made it this far.
    1
  19.  @leewolf6434  He just sells "traditional" ideas that are hard to defend couched in a way that makes you feel better about having them. He makes it sound like there is a rational argument for many widely discredited ideas which still have a market hungry to validate them in a way they do not sound awful and repressive. How personally I feel about Jorden's views is far less important than the fact he argues using misappropriated terms and consistently relies empty bad spin to validate his claims. He concocts "smart sounding" empty arguments to make bad failed ideas sound like they are based in merit rather than just feelings. That is the reason you like him.
    1
  20.  @leewolf6434  Any tradition that props up conformity for conformities sake is anti personal freedom. You may be cool with that but frankly how you feel about other peoples freedom should be irrelevant! Just own that you are happy to crush the rights of others for your feelings. You are correct, we clearly disagree. I do not see much common ground to be found. It validates why you like Jordon, he makes you feel better about how you feel in spite of the fact the things you like are consistently regressive. Have a nice day yourself. Cheers.
    1
  21. ​ @74Voyeur  The job often attracts the corrupt but rarely someone with strong morals manages to barge past the gate keepers, they are then destroyed and replaced by outside forces. It all comes down to profit for the monsters who promote the corruption because it is good for their business model.
    1
  22. If pp went closer toward trump, he would have lost way worse. Pp was done the moment justin quit.
    1
  23. Only to a very specific kind of NPC.
    1
  24. He is not, he is free to do whatever but just like he demands on his own website must meet to TOS of where he is.
    1
  25. You are really really sad. Jordan is a entertainer, not a leader.
    1
  26. Not rocked, celebrating
    1
  27.  @youtuber6185  Says a member of the right that is all cult all the time. Crazy projection fringe dweller.
    1
  28.  @plynwow  Short answer no, never and even if he got leadership he would never win. The fringe ideas he stands beside may excite you but they are not widely popular.
    1