Comments by "sharper68" (@sharper68) on "The Damage Report" channel.

  1. 79
  2. 45
  3. 20
  4. 14
  5. 14
  6. 13
  7. 12
  8. 12
  9. 12
  10. 11
  11. 11
  12. 11
  13. 11
  14. 11
  15. 10
  16. 10
  17. 10
  18. 10
  19. 10
  20. 10
  21. 9
  22. 9
  23. 9
  24. 9
  25. 9
  26. 9
  27. 9
  28. 9
  29. 9
  30. 8
  31. 8
  32. 8
  33. 8
  34. 8
  35. 8
  36. 8
  37. 8
  38. 8
  39. 7
  40. 7
  41. 7
  42. 7
  43. 7
  44. 7
  45. 7
  46. 7
  47. 7
  48. 7
  49. 7
  50. 7
  51. 7
  52. 6
  53. 6
  54. 6
  55. 6
  56. 6
  57. 6
  58. 6
  59. 6
  60. 6
  61. 6
  62. 6
  63. 6
  64. 6
  65. 6
  66. 6
  67. 6
  68. 6
  69. 6
  70. 6
  71. 6
  72. 6
  73. 6
  74. 5
  75. 5
  76. 5
  77. @gz The predictions you claim as validated by "secular sources" are not validated. This is a slight of hand and does not pass any kind of rational sniff test. The prophesies you cite are very very general and the nature of the language used or in some cases because of bad translation is so unspecific as to be realized many times since they were made. To walk through the list of fulfilled prophesy you cite is not compelling without your mask of faith over them. The self importance of those expecting the end times any day now is the root of your unearned and identity based superiority. Your empty claim to special knowledge backed up bogus claims to have evidence speaks to your brand of delusion. Every deeply faithful person no matter what the religion has the exact same amount of validation as you do, the exact same amount. You all think you have reason for certainty but are backed up using the same mechanism of blind faith. The way you divide us by left and right while attaching your religion to it is revealing on the kind of media you consume. It attaches you to a movement that moving ever further away from the actual teachings of Christ in the bible, toward an abject worship of power and might makes right. The movement hijacking your good intentions is based on fringe and concocted wedge issues, many of them contemporary and not well referenced in the bible. When it comes to finances or helping the poor these godly people, consistently spit in the face of Christs ideals to enrich their donors. Neither party is particularly Christian as far as I can see. They are both far too focused on corporate welfare, war, empowerment of the rich and social stasis instead of the meeting the needs of actual people as Jesus would encourage. The GOP is hard mask off anti Christian with their attacks on any service to the poor and focus on empowering only the rich and the repressive. Those who have a better chance of getting trough the eye of needle (according to the bible) than getting into heaven. They are pro war, anti poor, anti sojourner, pro crony capitalist ,the antithesis of the big J who was more anti wealth than even communists are. Not being evangelical is not equal to being godless, respecting others right to worship as they choose is not being godless. Opposing law based on anyone's faith claims is in no way godless! Having a different take on reproductive rights or health care between you and doctor is NOT godless! Cutting lunch programs for kids, advocating for endless war, attacking all sojourners as criminal, servicing ultra rich mega donors and repressive religious grifters hoarding mountains of money at their temple, unilaterally supporting governments ruled tyrants and murders most certainly is.
    5
  78. 5
  79. 5
  80. 5
  81. 5
  82. 5
  83. 5
  84. 5
  85. 5
  86. 5
  87. 5
  88. 5
  89. 5
  90. 5
  91. 5
  92. 5
  93. 5
  94. 5
  95. 5
  96. 5
  97. 5
  98. 5
  99. 5
  100. 5
  101. 5
  102. 5
  103. 5
  104. 5
  105. 5
  106. 5
  107. 4
  108. 4
  109. 4
  110. 4
  111. 4
  112. 4
  113. 4
  114. 4
  115. 4
  116. 4
  117. 4
  118. 4
  119. 4
  120. 4
  121. 4
  122.  @antcap66  Blaming co-morbid's for the deaths of most of these patients is silly. It is like blaming the sudden stop after a patent is shoved out of a ten story building instead of who pushed them. I am not a consumer of main stream media. Your assumption I am is natural but unfounded. There is no virus agenda, there is nothing to be gain those who were already in charge did not have. In fact is their apple cart that is turned over and there is no upside in promoting a world wide shut (that is still partially in effect the world over) as some kind of hoax. The people with the power to do this gain nothing from fucking up their cash cow. I have seen no remotely valid reason why anyone would do this or an explanation of what you think they get. We are in agreement that it more radically effects nursing homes and has a very high mortality rate in those facilities. It speaks to how poorly we have managed the pandemic and that suggests the experts were learning as they went or did not have the ear the politicians who could actually enact the change. The common flu killed 34,000 people last year. It was considered one of the most deadly and pernicious virus's in the population. With that said, outside some partial inoculations against specific strains and no social distancing or any other precautions it killed less than a quarter this one has. We are not done the year yet. I think we can agree that these two pathogens are not the same and probably should not be compared as similar. Covid 19 is novel virus, this means the human immune system has no counter to it. None. It means every person starts the fight from zero, those with strong immune systems generally fare pretty well with a low count of long term disabilities and deaths. It is particularly dangerous to the elderly and anyone that is immunocompromised or sick with something else they are currently battling. The reason the virus is such a social health issue is the danger to vulnerable populations but the significant percentage that require hospitalization if allowed to spread unchecked. The fact it can be spread by asyomtomic vectors it is both air borne and spread by contact with mucus membranes in the form of droplets from peoples mouths when they talk means it spreads quickly in close contact. I have done a lot of research both from medical professionals but also in the annals of where you draw your inspiration. I find it much more plausible this is a real pandemic run by assholes who are learning on the job than part of a grand conspiracy by evil genius's all seeking some dubious and unmentioned reward for turning the world upside down and pissing everyone off.
    4
  123. 4
  124. 4
  125. 4
  126. 4
  127. 4
  128. 4
  129. 4
  130. 4
  131. 4
  132. 4
  133. 4
  134. 4
  135. 4
  136. 4
  137. 4
  138. 4
  139. 4
  140. 4
  141. 4
  142. 4
  143. 4
  144. 4
  145. 4
  146. 4
  147. 4
  148. 4
  149. 4
  150. 4
  151. 4
  152. 4
  153. 4
  154. 4
  155. 4
  156. 4
  157. 4
  158. 4
  159. 4
  160. 4
  161. 4
  162. 4
  163. 4
  164. 4
  165. 4
  166. 4
  167. 4
  168. 4
  169. 3
  170. 3
  171. 3
  172. 3
  173. 3
  174. 3
  175. 3
  176. 3
  177. 3
  178. 3
  179. 3
  180. 3
  181. 3
  182. 3
  183. 3
  184. 3
  185. 3
  186. 3
  187. 3
  188. 3
  189. 3
  190. 3
  191. 3
  192. 3
  193. 3
  194. 3
  195. 3
  196. 3
  197. 3
  198. 3
  199. 3
  200. 3
  201. 3
  202. 3
  203. 3
  204. 3
  205. 3
  206. 3
  207. 3
  208. 3
  209. 3
  210. 3
  211. 3
  212. 3
  213. 3
  214. 3
  215. 3
  216. 3
  217. 3
  218. @Anthony Gordon  The idea that men are not matterlistic and women are is silly on the face of it. Men control almost all the resources on the planet and always have, it is not unreasonable the half of the population that has tradionally been forced to take what they got would reach out for more given a chance, maybe you crave to have no power over your finances or comfort but the idea is bizarre to me Times have changed and the fact woman work and have jobs today changes the power dynamic of tradional relationships, I would argue the change is good for all as it allows us to choose what we would be and what we value instead of society choosing it for us. Those who need simple black and white rules as to what they should do and who they should be are the ones struggling. I want and demand more from my partner than sex and companionship, so should every man. If you have no ability to be introspective, to be empathic, to care about her as a person, then you will struggle as you are not well equiped for a modern relationship. If you do break the mold and find a way to appreciate her as someone you like and not just a maid and whore you will do just fine. You will have a happier, stronger relationship than your grandparents did even if they stayed together til the end. If you want a relationship that is more traditional, it exists out there for you. I posit these are the relationships that struggle most. In the past, they were held together by the women having no options. That time is not coming back. I see more freedom and less cookie-cutter roles as a good thing. I value the individual contributions of men and women as people instead of the cardboard inflexible chactures that defined their roles in the past, The parallel stat that many men have no close friends is the canary in the coal mine to me, if you can not form basic friendships It should be no shock you have trouble with romance or long term relationships. These lonely confused people need to look at themselves first before complaining about all women.
    3
  219. 3
  220. 3
  221. 3
  222. 3
  223. 3
  224. 3
  225. 3
  226. 3
  227. 3
  228. 3
  229. 3
  230. 3
  231. 3
  232. 3
  233. 3
  234. 3
  235. 3
  236. 3
  237.  @beckydoesit9331  Ya, I do know. That does not explain why our numbers are ridiculous compared to those who test basically as heavily as we do per capita or are just behind us. The fact is our death numbers are unapparelled and that does not speak to the "power" of our testing. The rest of the world correctly considers us a covid hell hole. It is our cases and deaths that are the problem not a hatred of Trump. They would treat us this way no matter who was in charge because we are basically a dangerous typhoid Mary at this point. South Korea takes it very very seriously. They are not ignoring the virus like our officials are, when you make out they are it is an assertion you have no clue what you are talking about. They have extensive electronic and in person contact tracing and support for those infected + their families to ensure they quarantine. They are nothing like us. Their hospitals are not full like ours are. Japan since the beginning had near 100% public mask use. Again they have a history of taking public health issues very seriously. That alone could have mitigated as many as 100k in deaths here. Oh, their hospitals not full like ours. The same efforts that protect us against Covid protect against a much less contagious or deadly virus the flu when we normally do nothing to avoid it. You clowns need to stop babbling about the flu as it makes you look extra ignorant or indoctrinated. Pretending we are doing well is nonsense propped up by bubble think and naked partisan garbage chosen because it makes you feel good.
    3
  238. 3
  239. 3
  240. 3
  241. 3
  242. 3
  243. 3
  244. 3
  245. 3
  246. 3
  247. 3
  248. 3
  249. 3
  250. 3
  251. 3
  252. 3
  253. 3
  254. 3
  255. 3
  256. 3
  257. 3
  258. 3
  259. 3
  260. 3
  261. 3
  262. 3
  263. 3
  264. 3
  265. 3
  266. 3
  267. 3
  268. 3
  269. 3
  270. 3
  271. 3
  272. 3
  273. 3
  274. 3
  275. 3
  276. 3
  277. 3
  278. 3
  279. 3
  280. 3
  281. 3
  282. 3
  283. 3
  284. 3
  285. 2
  286. 2
  287. 2
  288. 2
  289. 2
  290. 2
  291. 2
  292. 2
  293. 2
  294. 2
  295. 2
  296. 2
  297. 2
  298. 2
  299. 2
  300. 2
  301. 2
  302. 2
  303. 2
  304. 2
  305. 2
  306. 2
  307. 2
  308. 2
  309. 2
  310. 2
  311. 2
  312. 2
  313. 2
  314. 2
  315. 2
  316. 2
  317. 2
  318. 2
  319. 2
  320. 2
  321. 2
  322. 2
  323. 2
  324. 2
  325. 2
  326. 2
  327. 2
  328. 2
  329. 2
  330. 2
  331. 2
  332. 2
  333. 2
  334. 2
  335. 2
  336. 2
  337. 2
  338. 2
  339. 2
  340. 2
  341. 2
  342. 2
  343. 2
  344. 2
  345. 2
  346. 2
  347. 2
  348. 2
  349. 2
  350. 2
  351. 2
  352. 2
  353. 2
  354. 2
  355. 2
  356. 2
  357. 2
  358. 2
  359. 2
  360. 2
  361. 2
  362. 2
  363. 2
  364. 2
  365.  @johnkeane1419  These stupid stats are a reason for you to fail, if that is what you need have at it. Being a brooding defeatist spells like death to everyone. The idea only 20% of men are interesting is empty and incorrect unless you really focus on a tight specific young demographic. Even then it is a an optertunity to be interesting in a sea of those who do not normally get looked at. Young men are struggling more than all men are. Once getting into relationships was was the primary focus of young woman. That has changed and I see it has upsides for both men and woman. Getting married young is what we have traditionally have done but I do not see it as something we should be pushing for now. I generally see young marriages as deeply problematic for many reasons. Not the least of which is financial in this day and age. Better to get married later when you have a idea of who both partners are and what they want. Better to do it when you are not hand to mouth, with 3 roommates to help you pay for your rent. Getting married later ensures the person you marry is more likely to be who they are as they age. Marrying someone in their early 20's ensures you will go through a time when they grow up and change. Without good communication this is not always ideal for a relationship. I do not see these stats as catastrophic as some might. What does concern me is many of these guys also do not have friends. I see this issue a symptom of the real problem, it speaks to why they do not have female relationships if they can not even foster one with fellow men. Are men shallow and greedy too, is that why these guys are alone?
    2
  366.  @johnkeane1419  I think there is a narrative attached to your concerns which does exist, but it does not have to change or apply to your life unless you let it. Soft skills are valuable and possible to learn if you are missing them. The idea men can't do that kind of work is silly and is like saying woman can not lead because of some random and empty reason. Woman do find men attractive, that they do not find twenty something men very intersting is not a shock to me. As a group, they regularly have no idea who they yet are or what they want from life. Strait out of mom's basement you are not as good of a catch as you imagine yourself. No one wants to take on roll of mother and housekeeper in their 20's. I do not blame woman for looking at these guys who are just starting out with no relationship experience, no life experience, limited prospects and an inherited set of poorly thought out expectations as less than interesting. The key to being interesting to any modern woman is to have your own life, to be independent, comfortable and happy in your skin without needing anyone else. Loneliness and unrequited desire smells like death to everyone. Owning yourself and who you are goes a long way to being attractive to both friends and lovers. This is not just an issue with woman, these guys are apparently having issues forming any relationships. That is the root of the problem. This is not about being easy, life was rarely ever easy for anyone. In the past. it was often much much harder. This is about taking advantage of the new freedom you have to pick who you want to be and to own it. Do so and you will find people that appreciate your focus.
    2
  367. 2
  368. 2
  369. 2
  370. 2
  371. 2
  372. 2
  373. 2
  374. 2
  375. 2
  376. 2
  377. 2
  378. 2
  379.  @freedom-not-oppression  Your spin indicates this is a huge problem that somehow undermines all woman, this is dishonest bullshit used to attack trans people. The distinction about them being biological woman or men is empty and fucking totally stupid in this context. Some men are great at sports, some are not. Some woman are great in sports and some are not. There will always be athletes in a given sport who are better than others because of some genetic advantage, such is the nature of sport. In almost every iteration of sport it is largely irrelevant if woman and men play on the same teams. The Taliban like need to separate woman and men from playing together is a legacy of a time when woman were not allowed to play practically anything. The separation of the sexes is in sport is a cultural phenomena that has been breaking down in the last decades. This is especially true outside the professional level where most players of all genders play. The fact is woman have been playing in men's leagues and have been for a while. Your faux outrage over protecting woman is thinly veiled bullshit from a group who happily strips other fundamental rights of woman as a focus. It is a thin cover for your real hunger to be a bigot. Someone that crushes others rights over your feelings because you do not understand or like them. Your LARP as caring about them is exposed as a naked lie. Unless you are trans, this issue has literally NOTHING to do with you. Your whiney nonsense is akin to complaining you are playing in a league where there are people that are better than you in your sport; then seeking to ban them for it. You appear to love oppression ... a name change may be in order for your account
    2
  380. 2
  381. 2
  382. 2
  383. 2
  384. 2
  385. 2
  386. 2
  387. 2
  388. 2
  389. 2
  390. 2
  391. 2
  392. 2
  393. 2
  394. 2
  395. 2
  396. 2
  397. 2
  398. 2
  399. 2
  400. 2
  401. 2
  402. 2
  403. 2
  404. 2
  405. 2
  406. 2
  407. 2
  408.  @mrdannyheim6712  Just like when you run from a dog that is snarling at you, running from them will do little good. The key is to not have a reason to be nose to nose to begin with. We are talking about empty ignorant bullies that are breaking the law in real way, that appeals to a minority even in the clown show of fringe right wing idiots who are more talk than action. Leaving them spout about it unopposed in rhetoric is tacit support for what they do. I am unconcerned about needing to stand my ground with a gun. I am not in these halfwits cross hairs, nor either are you likely. They are more venting anger at boogie men they have had invented up for them like a bed time story that justifies the deep anger they feel at the sense the world is leavening them behind. They would be well served in venting that anger at the crony capitalists they elect. But instead all their ire is focused on the democrats who for the most part act like 90's republicans on foreign policy and economic issues as godless America hating communists. They have propagandised to make them hate the least purchased leaders in either party the very most. They can be weaponized to become actively dangerous. This may still happen in small isolated groups , but that concern is unlikely to connect with either of our lives in this largish country. Very few will have to actually run and hide or decide to pick up a gun. That being said standing up and calling out any asshat leader that plays into this murder porn narrative has value. I can't see why we would not do so, even if they paint me as "angry".
    2
  409. 2
  410. 2
  411. 2
  412. 2
  413. 2
  414. 2
  415. 2
  416. 2
  417. 2
  418. 2
  419. 2
  420. 2
  421. 2
  422. 2
  423. 2
  424. 2
  425. 2
  426. 2
  427. 2
  428. 2
  429. 2
  430. 2
  431. 2
  432. 2
  433. 2
  434. 2
  435. 2
  436. 2
  437. 2
  438. 2
  439. 2
  440. 2
  441. 2
  442. 2
  443. 2
  444. 2
  445. 2
  446. 2
  447. 2
  448. 2
  449. 2
  450. 2
  451. 2
  452. 2
  453. 2
  454. 2
  455. 2
  456. 2
  457. 2
  458. 2
  459. 2
  460. 2
  461. 2
  462. 2
  463. 2
  464. 2
  465. 2
  466. 2
  467. 2
  468. 2
  469. 2
  470. 2
  471. 2
  472. 2
  473. 2
  474. 2
  475. 2
  476. 2
  477. 2
  478. 2
  479. 2
  480. 2
  481. 2
  482. 2
  483.  @1neAdam12  You have no idea what the word research means. It does not mean going through your face book feed or consuming nonsense that validates your preconceptions. I have forgotten more about this vaccine and virus than you will ever bother to learn. I got news for you sparky, you are a cultist and no version of any kind of scientific expert. The concerns you cite are all valid and based on real science. The hyperbolic nature of your fear of them is entirely manufactured nonsense for a specific brand of clueless NPC. The "Jabs" are working, that they do not give total Immunol protection and will require boosters does not change that fact. No matter how you get it Immunol protection for this virus is transitory and fades. This means via shot or infection your Immunol protection fades over time and you will need booster or another dance with the virus to top it up. The side effects of the vaccine were deeply concerning especially early on when there was no context for them and we did not know how often they occurred. Those days are now well behind us. The actual science on this issue is in. The danger associated with the vaccine is dwarfed by the consistent deeply problematic long term issues attached with contracting and helping to continue to proliferate the virus. You are not special or informed, you have bought into a brand of nonsense that appeals to your personal fears and feelings. You are not a scientist and never understood them, that has not changed because you joined a cult.
    2
  484. 2
  485. 2
  486. 2
  487. 2
  488. 2
  489. 2
  490. 2
  491. 2
  492. 2
  493. 2
  494. 2
  495. 2
  496. 2
  497. 2
  498. 2
  499. 2
  500. 2
  501. 2
  502. 2
  503. 2
  504. 2
  505. 2
  506. 1
  507. 1
  508. 1
  509. 1
  510. 1
  511. 1
  512. 1
  513. This is a tempest in a tea pot and not a big deal for the handful of people ever negatively effected by it. Depending on the level of sport the legitimacy of this discussion changes, most people deeply against it have no dog in this fight and are painting their ignorance of the larger subject based on personal feelings and limited information often spun to engage them by trigging their anger. The idea this is a matter of safety is empty as outliers in size and strength even within the traditional standards already exist in all sport. There is not a lot of valid arguments for integration and few very strong ones against it. This assertion is especially true in kids sports where size and power of individual children vary widely even within a single biological sex. As long as we are not excluding boys who are too small or girls who are bigger than their contemporaries the safety argument we are ignoring the safety argument already. No reasons to start coddling kids who want to compete in sports more than we already do. At higher levels of sport the argument becomes less clear. As I look at it, the actual problems it causes it seems to be of little concern. To demand a dedicated professional athlete stop competing over an concern that is less about fairness and more about a preservation of a status quo is a tough sell. In woman's sport the status quo means they will continue to be unfortunately as second rate and uninteresting compared to men's sports. I personally see very little upside in being draconian about it, professionals are beat by other professionals all the time. They are used to it. This is an issue that affects almost no one, many who never bother to ever even follow woman's sports oddly now seem very concerned about fairness of contests they never watched. If you were not engaged in woman's sport before and still have a strong opinion on this it is because you have been led to it by your chosen media. You do not have the whole picture and are buying into an strong identity based argument over an issue that does not and will not change your life. It is another blatant empty policy distraction to make you look the other way as clowns at the top rob us all
    1
  514. 1
  515. 1
  516. 1
  517. 1
  518. 1
  519. 1
  520. 1
  521. 1
  522. 1
  523. 1
  524. 1
  525. 1
  526. 1
  527. 1
  528. 1
  529. 1
  530. 1
  531. 1
  532. 1
  533. 1
  534. 1
  535. 1
  536. 1
  537. 1
  538. 1
  539. 1
  540. 1
  541. 1
  542. 1
  543. 1
  544. 1
  545. 1
  546. 1
  547. 1
  548. 1
  549. 1
  550. 1
  551. 1
  552. 1
  553. 1
  554. 1
  555. 1
  556. 1
  557. 1
  558. 1
  559. 1
  560. 1
  561. 1
  562. 1
  563. 1
  564. 1
  565. 1
  566. 1
  567. 1
  568. 1
  569. 1
  570. 1
  571. 1
  572. 1
  573. 1
  574. 1
  575. 1
  576. 1
  577. 1
  578. 1
  579. 1
  580. 1
  581. 1
  582. 1
  583. 1
  584. 1
  585. 1
  586. 1
  587. 1
  588. 1
  589. 1
  590. 1
  591. 1
  592. 1
  593. 1
  594. 1
  595. 1
  596. 1
  597. 1
  598. 1
  599. 1
  600. 1
  601. 1
  602. 1
  603. 1
  604. 1
  605. 1
  606. 1
  607. 1
  608. 1
  609. 1
  610. 1
  611. 1
  612. 1
  613. 1
  614. 1
  615. 1
  616. 1
  617. 1
  618. 1
  619. 1
  620. 1
  621. 1
  622. 1
  623. 1
  624. 1
  625. 1
  626. 1
  627. 1
  628. 1
  629. 1
  630. 1
  631. 1
  632. 1
  633. 1
  634. 1
  635. 1
  636. 1
  637. 1
  638. 1
  639. 1
  640. 1
  641. 1
  642. 1
  643. 1
  644. 1
  645. 1
  646. 1
  647. 1
  648. 1
  649. 1
  650. 1
  651. 1
  652. 1
  653. 1
  654. 1
  655. 1
  656. 1
  657. 1
  658. 1
  659. 1
  660. 1
  661. 1
  662. 1
  663. 1
  664. 1
  665. 1
  666. 1
  667. 1
  668. 1
  669. 1
  670. 1
  671. 1
  672. 1
  673. 1
  674. 1
  675. 1
  676. 1
  677. 1
  678. 1
  679. 1
  680. 1
  681. 1
  682. 1
  683. 1
  684. 1
  685. 1
  686. 1
  687. 1
  688. 1
  689. 1
  690. 1
  691. 1
  692. 1
  693. 1
  694. 1
  695. 1
  696. 1
  697. 1
  698. 1
  699. 1
  700. 1
  701. 1
  702. 1
  703. 1
  704.  @napoleonruss1528  It is not worth ruining all the trans athlete lives (a dozen or so country wide) so a handful of bench warmers can bench warm. The best players will all still play. The idea that some biological male is going to run away with all the highly treasured and lucrative female sporting awards is poorly thought out and not a real problem. If the individuals you are concerned about are great they will compete as a great athlete, but their effort does not take away the efforts of anyone else involved. Star players raise the quality of others play, it is what they do. There is no upside that is promoted by your spin, there is a great deal of harm done as you ignore the clear damage and marginalize youths you do not care about simply because of who they are. You are climbing on a political prosecution bandwagon with clowns who share your talking points. They are literally stripping rights from woman while pretending that they value their agency and rights as woman when it comes to sport. It makes a lie of the entire argument you make which is little more than trumped up snowflake bigotry based on nonsense spin, that you happen to buy into. The fake outrage you are engaging in hurts far more people than it protects, as designed. The whole trans athlete bruhaha is faux outrage, dishonest spin Invented by a group of repressive assholes who are actively stripping actual rights from woman. They do this as they pretend to protect them in this very narrow fake moral panic issue. They are defending them from the grave and terrifying hazard of a girl not making a team because there is a better player. Getting the last bench warmer place on the team is not and should not be a protected right. Being able to try out, should be.
    1
  705. 1
  706. 1
  707. 1
  708. 1
  709. 1
  710. 1
  711. 1
  712. 1
  713. 1
  714. 1
  715. 1
  716. 1
  717. 1
  718. 1
  719. 1
  720. 1
  721. 1
  722. 1
  723. 1
  724. 1
  725. 1
  726. 1
  727. 1
  728. 1
  729. 1
  730. 1
  731. 1
  732. 1
  733. 1
  734. 1
  735. 1
  736. 1
  737. 1
  738. 1
  739. 1
  740. 1
  741. 1
  742. 1
  743. 1
  744. 1
  745. 1
  746. 1
  747. 1
  748. 1
  749. 1
  750. 1
  751. 1
  752. 1
  753. 1
  754. 1
  755. 1
  756. 1
  757. 1
  758. 1
  759. 1
  760. 1
  761. 1
  762. 1
  763. 1
  764. 1
  765. 1
  766. 1
  767. 1
  768. 1
  769. 1
  770. 1
  771. 1
  772. 1
  773. 1
  774. 1
  775. 1
  776. 1
  777. 1
  778. 1
  779. 1
  780. 1
  781. 1
  782. 1
  783. 1
  784. 1
  785. 1
  786. 1
  787. 1
  788. 1
  789. 1
  790. 1
  791. 1
  792. 1
  793. 1
  794. 1
  795. 1
  796. 1
  797. 1
  798. 1
  799. 1
  800. 1
  801. 1
  802. 1
  803. 1
  804. 1
  805. 1
  806. 1
  807. 1
  808. 1
  809. 1
  810. 1
  811. 1
  812. 1
  813. 1
  814. 1
  815. 1
  816. 1
  817. 1
  818. 1
  819. 1
  820. 1
  821. 1
  822. 1
  823. 1
  824. ​ @indymarrow8050 The tea party was owned by the Koch's. That you were a "strict libertarian" does not recommend you and the fact you then switched to supporting overt crony capitalist/religious freak shows is quite a 180. I do not expect you to catch up as you seem to somehow pride yourself on ignorance but will attach the a whole bunch of information that is all independently verifiable if you follow the sources. Not that I expect you to even read it. The only reason you do not know this commonly known fact is you live in a bubble and did not look outside it. It pretty sad when you have to lie to yourself to hang onto your asserted nonsense. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/oct/13/tea-party-billionaire-koch-brothers https://www.huffingtonpost.com/brendan-demelle/study-confirms-tea-party-_b_2663125.html https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2010/08/30/covert-operations https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2018/10/the-koch-networks-integrated-strategy-for-social-transformation/ https://www.beaconbroadside.com/broadside/2017/12/the-rich-and-hidden-political-influence-of-the-koch-brothers.html http://zfacts.com/koch-brothers I got my "misinformation" by opening my eyes and paying attention to something other than fox news an other paid shills. I could have filled pages with a simple google search to verify what I have known the whole time. I am pretty sure you must live in a bubble and never have never bothered to look outside it. It is pretty funny being called idiotic by the likes of you.
    1
  825. 1
  826. 1
  827. 1
  828. 1
  829. 1
  830. 1
  831. 1
  832. 1
  833. 1
  834. 1
  835. 1
  836. 1
  837. 1
  838. 1
  839. 1
  840. 1
  841. 1
  842. 1
  843. 1
  844. 1
  845. 1
  846. 1
  847. 1
  848. 1
  849. 1
  850. 1
  851. 1
  852. 1
  853. 1
  854. 1
  855. 1
  856. 1
  857. 1
  858. 1
  859. 1
  860. 1
  861. 1
  862. 1
  863. 1
  864. 1
  865. 1
  866. 1
  867. 1
  868. 1