Comments by "sharper68" (@sharper68) on "Rationality Rules" channel.

  1. Priggy They should be fighting to knock out every Clinton type leader who are beholden to corruption and replace them with people who work for the voters and not the highest bidder. The days of us voting on pro life as fight have to end. They are literally selling the country out from under us while we struggle to maintain enough power to keep 40 year old rights in place. The establishment democrats are empty shills who believe in nothing or do not have the guts to fight for it if they do. You can say they are better than the current brand of republican in some ways but that is damning with faint praise. The days of them throwing us scraps while not winning being able to win elections because they hate their base have to end. Kyle is 100% pro free speech. He stands against corruption and seeks to silence no one. That is fight we all should join in and I see it as principled.
    4
  2. The voice over guy was painful to listen to, it makes one wonder if he believes the stuff he is reading .
    4
  3. This was pretty fun ...
    2
  4. Duh! It has been clear to me that he consistently mis-fames and misrepresents his opponents position in every argument he makes.
    2
  5. Nasty Vinyl Cun7er The fact is if being concerned about a pedophile running the show is a focus one should have issue with Christianity too. In Christianities asserted story god "saved us" by raping a child into a teen who was betrothed to another man. That no one talks about that fact seems odd to me. Every single version of faith from horrible to benign picks and chooses the parts of their book they want to follow and what they want to ignore. They are all sufficiently vague and contradictory coupled with the fact each group chooses what is important that they can be used to justify healthy community to total horror. Neither with a claim on the correct version.
    1
  6. I would argue it is not the left eating itself, I would lay that at the feet of an authoritarian "left" branded group who that is doing so while hiding behind progressive language as a sales pitch to youth. I understand there are elements within the "left" who are acting regressive. They are acting exclusive and like traditional conservatives who attempt to control the dialog by silencing opposition and drawing lines, us and them to form a kind of unity adherents find comfortable. They are the real regressives and I am comfortable attacking them from the left as they do not represent it's ideals with their spin. There has been open warfare against these people for years and the media has painted them as representing the "left" and the right has falsely demonized anyone who identifies as left wing with their failures. The fact is these people do not represent the ideals of the left at all and their authoritarian tendencies are much more akin to the existing right ion issues of speech and overt identity politics. I see many who value free speech and do not support authoritarian principles calling them out from the "left" and this is valid. None of this changes the truth that the right consistently advocates for this exact kind of restrictive muzzle on speech while no one ever seems to be very concerned about it eating itself. Perhaps the if right is not eating itself because all that is left is the mouth.
    1
  7. Sophistry from Stefan, I am shocked, shocked I tell you.
    1