Comments by "stream2watch" (@stream2watch) on "Anders Puck Nielsen" channel.

  1. But the R37 does not have decent datalink because Russia has about 4 early warning planes left. F16 can get data from AWACS or Global Hawk while running dark.
    1
  2.  @lethalfang  This! A quick glance tells us that "It is designed to shoot down tankers, AWACS and other C4ISTAR aircraft[" Shooting it at F16s would be a waste of a missile
    1
  3.  @goenzoy712  Funny how you pretend to be American yet your syntax is 100% Russian.
    1
  4. Why? Do you believe TV for old people have more of an impact?
    1
  5.  @cat_city2009  How is it succeeding? RU have lost 10K on it already.
    1
  6.  @cat_city2009  Not an argument.
    1
  7. Your blinders are on. Russia are doing the invading here. If the do not want a fight on their doorstep, what are they doing in Ukraine?
    1
  8. You're Russian and you have a brand new acct. You're the fantasist here.
    1
  9. LOL. Check your narrative, bot. You are so 2022.
    1
  10.  @praveendreamer  First of all "the west" is not expanding by force. It expands as soon as you go to a Starbucks or wear a pair of pants instead of a lungi. Second, it is not "could care less", it is "could NOT care less"
    1
  11. LOLfrican
    1
  12. Mearsheimer, the hawk that wants to relax with Russia so US can focus solely on the actual enemy, China. You people are silly when it comes to understanding this irrelevant old wreck's motivation. He is slightly to the right of Nixon.
    1
  13. "Russia is pivoting rapidly to the East" I love this meme. It is Dominic Cummings' level of agitprop. It is like the "we will make new trade deals with new exciting countries" Brexit slogan that failed to manifest itself.
    1
  14.  @traderboi2662  Not only do you not know when to use this expression, you also spelled it wrong. "suit your self" has a completely different meaning to "suit yourself". Are you 15?
    1
  15.  @traderboi2662  It is GRAMMAR. Grammer is not a word. The problem is also not a grammar one. I have corrected you on the topic, I also took the opportunity to underline that you are uneducated. That's a double whammy.
    1
  16. R is not even able to hold the areas. Imagine coming from China and Senegal. Stuck in a foxhole with a guy whose language you do not speak, waiting for the drones. They literally try to create a buffer with thirdie mercenaries with 2 weeks of training.
    1
  17. You still can not spell buffoon, gan-du. You're it.
    1
  18. Lame strawman. Deal with the things he says, not what you would prefer him to say.
    1
  19.  @OrthodoxSerb_  When they first were attacked they had nothing but ex-soviet gear. Nice way of destroying your own argument 🤣
    1
  20.  @OrthodoxSerb_  What you are spouting is no truth. Their army is not a NATO army, period. Get your childhood trauma out of your system
    1
  21.  @OrthodoxSerb_  When they first were attacked they had nothing but ex-soviet gear. Nice way of destroying your own argument
    1
  22.  @garethmartin6522  You're wasting your time even more than you usually do. That is what it's about. Look at you, tangled into a half-rsed argument that you don't even possess the faculties to clarify.
    1
  23. " the West immediately told everyone "Best Election EVER!!!"." Citation needed. "The West" does not have one voice btw. You are too ignorant to talk in public.
    1
  24.  @tomk3732  english Wikipedia says no such thing.
    1
  25. Det är väl dig?
    1
  26.  @ericp1139  " from the same sources that say Ukraine only lost 31,000 men? " He just told you 85k. Try to read the posts that you react to.
    1
  27.  @ericp1139  Read the post again.
    1
  28.  @ericp1139  "onwards," What, those 200 metres? Those garden sheds. What question are you trying to answer?
    1
  29.  @ericp1139  You seem kind of t-hich. The source you referred to gave another number, period. What cities are you talking about? Avdiivka and Bakhmut are not cities. Get a dictionary.
    1
  30.  @ericp1139  You are referring to one source stating 85K KIA by saying that the same source says 31K. That is an impossibility, end of.
    1
  31.  @ericp1139  " mega fortresses of Bakhmut and Avdiivka considered, then?" Not cities. Is it a Russian language issue? Get out of your ESL gutter.
    1
  32.  @ericp1139  "mega fortress" is not a synomym of city. Are you confused?
    1
  33.  @ericp1139  You are mixing sources, Kermit. Random Russian bots claim 500k KIA. Are you calling them liars?
    1
  34.  @ericp1139  They were towns, you utter waste of 0xygen. Now they are a Russian rebuilding cost.
    1
  35.  @ericp1139  You are too th-ick. Different sources have different data. YOU are the one to referred to one source that contradicted you. Now you are bringing in Zelensky who would make your original statement even less correct.
    1
  36.  @ericp1139  "Name me a source" Your onus of proof. Name me a 30k pop dwelling that is regarded as a city. Name me flattened piles of cement with 1000 population that are regarded as cities.
    1
  37.  @ericp1139  "Name me a source" Name me a source where a'vibrant metropolis' of 30k that is now a pile of rubble with 1000 people in the basements is regarded as a city.
    1
  38.  @ericp1139  Wikipedia is edited by Dunning Kruger sufferers like yourself. They are piles of rubble with 1000 people. How can they be cities, duh?
    1
  39.  @ericp1139  How would I know if he is a liar? You are though, by your own chosen source. Jog on.
    1
  40.  @ericp1139  I do not need to source anything, Kermit. You are the one that called them cities, now they "used to be cities". Make up your mind
    1
  41.  @ericp1139  " so is which source is true? " Depends. Which one do you rely on as source?
    1
  42.  @ericp1139  I should really give you an award. You are the only person on the spectrum I have spoken to all day. Are you undiagnosed?
    1
  43.  @ericp1139  They are TOWNS, Kermit. Do you come from a village?
    1
  44.  @ericp1139  "I believe they are all lying about the numbers." I do not care what you believe, vatnik.
    1
  45.  @ericp1139  "so which numbers do you believe?" Are we making conversation now, vatnik?
    1
  46.  @ericp1139  " where’s your source that they’re “towns?” " Correction. They are piles of rubble that used to be towns.
    1
  47.  @ericp1139  Your questions are off-topic as usual, sp-rg. We are not making conversation, Kermit. This is about your confused statements and your inability to produce evidence for them.
    1
  48.  @ericp1139  "engaged my comments." That is not proper English. How did I engage your comment, spectrum-boy? You forgot to answer if you have a diagnosis btw.
    1
  49.  @ericp1139  When did I complain about grammar? C'mon, tell us about your diagnosis.
    1
  50.  @ericp1139  But when did I complain about your grammar?
    1