Comments by "stream2watch" (@stream2watch) on "Russia's Kharkiv offensive – what is the plan?" video.

  1. ​ @vanjamenadzer  ​Are you gonna stop referring to that Uni study in bad faith from now on?
    3
  2. ​ @vanjamenadzer  ​ You are the only troll here. I will remind you, the troll study from Adelaide Uni that you refer to, does not say what you say it does. This makes you mah bt ch here tonight. Own up to it to regain your dignity
    3
  3. ​ @vanjamenadzer  And that does not support your thesis. Dunning-Kruger-Kar-en. You're dismissed.
    3
  4. I believe you are spamming his comment field, Indian.
    3
  5. Nice job putting 3-4 spelling errors in one sentence. Do not procreate.
    3
  6. "outnumbered 20:1, out of ammo, out of artillery, out of air defence and out of soldiers-" None of which is true.
    3
  7.  @annemllerpetersen1929  Yes I know. That is what I said. You believe things that are not true. You know this.
    3
  8.  @Fractal379  ".how's Ukraine been doing in reclaiming lost land" Pretty good. Look at 2022 map.
    3
  9. They are losing more than 30-50k per month. The "volunteers" will dry out and they are by and large Tuvans with 2 weeks of training. What good are they?
    3
  10. ​ @vanjamenadzer  That source does not support what you say in any way except tangentially. It is only related to twitter and only related to a limited amount of time, and only related to how many times certain hashtags were used Literally only from Twitter between late February and early March 2022
    2
  11.  @vanjamenadzer  This is what the actual bot study author Joshua Watt says "I am a lead author on this paper and I would like to point out that you have misinterpreted our results. We found that approximately 90% of ALL accounts contributing to the online discussion surrounding the war are pro-Ukrainian, not 90% of the bot accounts."
    2
  12.  @vanjamenadzer  4 posts to cope with being wrong. Silly
    2
  13. ​ @vanjamenadzer  Aaah, vranyo. Pity you stated I was right, but I guess that makes the vranyo even better, Kare n
    2
  14. ​ @vanjamenadzer  " they worded it exactly that way." THEY as in the University of Adelaide researcher that wrote the paper states it is the opposite, Ms Vranyo.
    2
  15.  @vanjamenadzer  "dog ate my homework" defense.
    2
  16.  @vanjamenadzer  Love how a RU troll decides to showcase their craft in a thread about Russian trolls btw.
    2
  17. ​ @vanjamenadzer  " 60% and 80% of tweets " "if 60-80% of all accounts are bots " I love how in your soft mind these things mean the same thing. Do not procreate. The world can not handle the mediocrity
    2
  18. "sit back and learn how battles are won" LOL.
    2
  19.  @vanjamenadzer  And what the actual measurement of the study was, was how information flowed from bot accounts to regular ones. This is the conclusion: Conclusions: The patterns of information flows between bot and non-bot account vary based on national lean: Pro-Russian non-bot accounts are most influential overall, with information flows to a variety of other account groups. No significant outward flows exist from pro-Ukrainian non-bot accounts, with significant flows from pro-Ukrainian bot accounts into pro-Ukrainian non-bot accounts. Pro-Russian account groups are seemingly isolated, with smaller self-entropy rates and less significant between group net information flows. However, there exists significant information flows out of pro-Russia non-bot and AstroTurf account groups, with the largest net flows originating in the pro-Russian non-bot account groups. Contrastingly, pro-Ukrainian account groups tend to have more information flows between pro-Ukrainian and balanced account groups. Pro-Ukrainian aggregated groups also tend to have higher self-entropy rates.
    1
  20. ​ @vanjamenadzer  Cop out. I just exposed you as a bad faith merchant and now you think a Karenesque comment as "don't reply to me" will work. I got your number. I got you cornered and you are not coping well. And yes, you are an orc enabler.
    1
  21.  @vanjamenadzer  ​ Cop out. I just exposed you as a bad faith merchant and now you think a Karenesque comment as "don't reply to me" will work. I got your number. I got you cornered and you are not coping well. And yes, you are an orc enabler.
    1
  22. ​ @vanjamenadzer  Cop out. I just exposed you as a bad faith merchant and now you think a Karenesque comment as "don't reply to me" will work. I got your number. I got you cornered and you are not coping well. And yes, you are an orc-enabler.
    1
  23. ​ @vanjamenadzer  The only troll and hte only female here is you. Are you gonna stop referring to that Uni study in bad faith from now on?
    1
  24. ​ @vanjamenadzer  You are the only troll here. I will remind you, the troll study from Adelaide Uni that you refer to, does not say what you say it does. This makes you mahbtch here tonight. Own up to it to regain your dignity
    1
  25. ​ @vanjamenadzer  Natursekt time. Get down. Gulp
    1
  26. LOL. Only 2 more years huh?
    1
  27.  @cat_city2009  How is it succeeding? RU have lost 10K on it already.
    1
  28.  @cat_city2009  Not an argument.
    1
  29. Very few square miles indeed.
    1
  30. He is a naval commander. Keeping his eyes open for threats. Do not worry about it.
    1
  31.  @stephenlyon1358  You can not even express yourself in English. What is your issue with the west "Stephen". You are pretending to be of the west after all.
    1
  32.  @stephenlyon1358  Non sequitur. If you want to talk censorship, look at Russia.
    1
  33.  @stephenlyon1358  What did you think?
    1
  34. ​ @BalloonInTheBalloon  Why do you think Russia buys North Korean ammo? A lack of artillery shells? Why do you think Russian refineries 1300km away get hit by very slow drones? Lack of AA? These are the staples that fuel war, vatnik. They are not absent on either side. They are in short suppply. Why do you think Russia fields T62 if T90 would be in sufficient supply? Do you have a reading comprehension issue?
    1
  35.  @BalloonInTheBalloon  " The Russians by themselves are producing more each year than the west combined." Yet you do not have access to that specific data. Also, stop cherrypicking. Why is Russia buying NK shells? How can slow Ukrainian drones go 1300km over Russian land except due to lack of AA?
    1
  36. ​ @BalloonInTheBalloon  "250 000 155mm shells/month " How nice of them to manufacture a calibre they do not use. The US factory in Scranton alone produces 30k 155mm per month. The Czech initiative has purchased hundreds of thousands alrady, Rheinmetall alone produces hundreds of thousands a year in factories from Germany to Malaysia. With the funding that already has been released the production is ticking up. What is most important though is that this releases millions from stockpiles everywhere from South Korea to the US.
    1
  37. ​ @BalloonInTheBalloon  Still requesting you to stop cherrypicking. If Russian AA is in ample supply, or their airforce in good shape, how can a slow Aeroprakt Cessna-size drone fly 1300km over a border to hit factories in Bashkortostan?
    1
  38. ​ @BalloonInTheBalloon  It was your chosen battlefield ", critical shortage of air defence", remember? This applies to Russia too, as evidence shows us. End of story.
    1
  39. ​ @BalloonInTheBalloon  "near total air dominance" Yet they are completely unable to fly any Russian manned aircraft over Ukrainian lines. That is not what air dominance means.
    1
  40. ​ @BalloonInTheBalloon  The only FABs they manage to drop are with wing kits. That is not air dominance. You are still cherrypicking what to answer btw. A nation that can not stop a huge and slow drone that then flies over its territory for 10 hours have an AA and an AirForce problem.
    1
  41.  @BalloonInTheBalloon  Got deleted. The only FABs that drop on Ukrainian lines are equipped with wing kits. That is not air dominance. Meanwhile, low and slow drones that fly over 1300km over RU territory indicates that they too have an airforce and AA problem.
    1
  42.  @BalloonInTheBalloon  Thank you. The Ukrainian JDAMs and Hammer bombs will soon come in large scale though, so quid pro quo. If there is anything the US can spare a very large amount of, it is JDAM.
    1
  43. Then why would you still be paid to post?
    1
  44. Such a legit comment
    1
  45.  @evgeniya7853  You should probably avoid the English language altogether, vatnik. It does not come out right.
    1