Comments by "stream2watch" (@stream2watch) on "Corey Gil-Shuster"
channel.
-
37
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
19
-
16
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@user-rl1jw4ep9k "then that shows your stupidity and stand with terrorism.."
You could have simply said "tunnels". We both know the purpose. It is the usage of the word "terror" suffixed with something, said with those ludicrous rrrrolling rrrr, as by one of Bibi's minions on TV, that means that is part of the brainwashing. "terrrrrorrr tunnels", "terrrrrorr balloons, "terrrrroor ben & jerry's". All pathetic. You do not know what is sounds like because you are surrounded by the ridiculousness of a state in permanent war all the time. The rest of the world just hears it and thinks you are a bit nuts. Which ofc is the case. You're no Norway.
"actual intention of proof of future and stable peace"
But your nation does not want that. Never wanted that. You waded through blood, handed out terrorism and ethnic cleansing, to get where you are and it will not end. You reap what you sow. In the words of Seth Rogen: "“[As] a Jewish person I was fed a huge amount of lies about Israel my entire life (...) They never tell you that, ‘Oh, by the way, there were people there’. They make it seem like it was just like sitting there, like the fkn-g door’s open.”
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@guywhousesapseudonymonyout4272 ""a sovereign state of which citizenship is restricted to members of a particular racial or ethnic group". "
" all the rights and benefits of Israeli citizenship."
Except the right of return and 40 odd other rules.
Do you really think there are any laws that give any special demands or strong advantages to any Finnish or Sami minority in Sweden, or Swedish and Sami minority in Finland? Think again.
"Israeli law bans torture, and enhanced interrogation. Fact."
Fact: it does not.
"Israeli courts have long addressed the legality of “special interrogation methods”: a cluster of rough tactics that includes subjecting the interrogee to painful stress positions, tight shackling and sleep deprivation. In a landmark 1999 decision the Supreme Court held that the ISA does not have legal authority to apply “special interrogation methods” that violate human dignity. It left open the possibility, however, that under extreme (“ticking bomb”) circumstances, interrogators who resorted to such measures would be able to later invoke the criminal law defense of necessity. "
"In the Duma case, the state prosecutor's office replaced the term cited in the 1999 judgment as the benchmark for evaluating the availability of the necessity defense, “ticking bomb,” with “ticking infrastructure.” This is not a semantic change. Rather, it expresses the position that information likely to significantly curtail the activities of a terrorist organization may establish a claim of necessity that could allow an extreme violation of the rights of an interrogee, without any need to point to a specific terrorist attack expected to be thwarted by the procured information. Such a position has far-reaching consequences and seriously deviates from the terms of the 1999 judgment; "
There you have it. The framework to override any issues is there. Neither is there repercussions for the torturer. If that was the case, considering how much Israel has tortured, there would be lots of cases. Face it, your legal system is a joke. You sell spyware and malware around the world like it was cookies FFS.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@crmiller1395
"KAFR KASSEM — The word had come down from the region’s high command: kill any Arab villager who breaks curfew. It was October 29, 1956, the first day of Israel’s Sinai campaign, and the army was worried about raids coming through the villages near what is now the Green Line, then still the Jordanian border.
Many villagers in Kafr Kassem hadn’t learned of the curfew, and on their way home that evening, a Border Police unit shot and killed 43 men, women and children and injured 13. Six more Arab Israelis were killed in clashes that lasted throughout that evening. Later, the Israeli judge who presided over the case would call the order to open fire “blatantly illegal.”
Sixty years later, during an event Sunday night at the Kafr Kassem cultural center, a panel that included a former chief of the Shin Bet domestic security service, a prominent rabbi, Arab Israeli MKs and academics agreed that the wounds have yet to heal."
Times of Israel reports that actual Shin Bet operatives are part of the recognition, but you go: his is a "IT IS A LIE LIE LIE AAAAH BLOOD LIBEL"
You are brainwashed. This video is about the brainwashed. It is about you.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@cxarhomell5867 " I did not start anything with ad hominems," Nope, you are confused or you have amnesia on top of all your other ailments. Go check the first post you wrote addressed to me. Proven wrong.
" I'm making an effort for myself, not from anybody else. "
This is not proper English.
" I am a part of a denomination within a religion. I am a part of the majority within my religion,"
Nope, you are an extremist. A Meir Kahane and Baruch Goldstein supporter. One crazy terrorist enabler that could barely string 2 seats in the Knesset. You are a minority, by definition. You are a fundamentalist fool that believes dinosaurs and humans coexisted and the world is a handful of thousand years old. This is a minority delusion even in Israel. Proven wrong again, you minority extremist there.
"If I said that I couldn't care less about this, that means that I would care about this."
No it is the other way around. What did I tell you about you not knowing the English language. Saying "I could care less" means that you currently care. Let me dumb it down for you. Not caring = 0. Being able to care less is higher than 0. Simple arithmetic. Google it, autist.
I talk to a lot of people online, but based on pure idiocy , you are in the lowest 1 percentile. You do not even command the language you are using. FYI, you are not fluent.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@cxarhomell5867 "It's that, not than. With than, it makes no difference. "Of course it does. Time for your tutorage again.THAN is used when there is a comparison, eg otherwise vs purposeful error is not an error. THAT is used when there is not a comparison between two opposites.
But back to the brass tacks. The correct non-retard phrase being ""People would have issues with you saying otherwise than a purposeful error is not an error.". Since, I am not saying otherwise, this means that people are on my side when it comes to stating that a purposeful error is not an error. It was what I said all along. Thank you for finally agreeing with me. Pity you do not know enough grammar to even understand when you are accidentally arguing FOR my cause AGAINST your previous claim. You've accidentally argued for my arguments against your own about 10 times by now. It is equally hilarious every time.
"When I physically write, I make sure everything is as good, meaning in syntax, context, and even in punctuation. "
Physically write as compared to virtually write? Spiritually write? As good as what? This is what is called a missing modifier in grammar. It is an error that would make you flunk an English class. It is the kind of error that would prevent you from being a lawyer, an M.D., a government administrator or any other kind of higher office. It's what I've been saying all along. You're stupid and you can't express yourself properly in the English language. It is so bad so that you will never be able to make a proper class journey, from the lower echelons of society to the higher. .
"Nobody in my family line needs to split the atom, because our atoms are normal and not filled with over-exaggerating and annoying people."
How could atoms be filled with people? Surely there are size concerns? Are you as confused about atomic size as you are by the geological age of the Earth, and the timeline of dinosaurs vs humans?
"I made sure my syntax and context were up to date, and whatever wordings I get wrong, I fix them.
You are messing up your tenses here. You made sure, but when did you stop making sure of this?
" I'll use whatever I need to use and you'll understand whatever I say despite the errors."
I do not understand what you mean because of the errors. Reading is not a guessing game. People that read on an intermediate level, with an IQ over 99, take this for granted. There are to be no misplaced modifiers, dangling modifiers, ambigious references in writing when normally gifted adults communicate via text. If everybody else can apply themselves, why can't you? Not enough grey matter? Inferior childhood and poor genetics? Did your mama know how to read in the English language? Something must have made you less suited for modern day survival, I would like to know what caused this sorry state of your intellect.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The dispossession and displacement of Palestinians from their homes is a crucial pillar of Israel’s apartheid system. Since its establishment the Israeli state has enforced massive and cruel land seizures against Palestinians, and continues to implement myriad laws and policies to force Palestinians into small enclaves. Since 1948, Israel has demolished hundreds of thousands of Palestinian homes and other properties across all areas under its jurisdiction and effective control.
As in the Negev/Naqab, Palestinians in East Jerusalem and Area C of the OPT live under full Israeli control. The authorities deny building permits to Palestinians in these areas, forcing them to build illegal structures which are demolished again and again.
In the OPT, the continued expansion of illegal Israeli settlements exacerbates the situation. The construction of these settlements in the OPT has been a government policy since 1967. Settlements today cover 10% of the land in the West Bank, and some 38% of Palestinian land in East Jerusalem was expropriated between 1967 and 2017.
Palestinian neighbourhoods in East Jerusalem are frequently targeted by settler organizations which, with the full backing of the Israeli government, work to displace Palestinian families and hand their homes to settlers. One such neighbourhood, Sheikh Jarrah, has been the site of frequent protests since May 2021 as families battle to keep their homes under the threat of a settler lawsuit.
Amnesty International
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@leon19736 "In time of Apartheid could black people vote, have parliament members , be generals in the army, high ranked police officers, diplomats, professors at Universities, judges, managers? Like 2 million of Arabs in Israel."
These are not the definitions of apartheid. These are red herrings.
Can citizen of Eastern Jerusalem vote over the people that have the violence monopoly over them? No they can't. Can a Palestinian resident there take the IDF to court in Israel? No they can't. Who has the legal power over Jews in the same area? Israeli courts. This is the definition of Apartheid. Same area. 2 different legal systems.
"So you decide to attack my grammar"
It was a comment on you as a whole, pretending to be one of us. If you were one of us, you'd be able to express yourselves like we do. It is symptomatic of the gung-ho zionists, that they can barely express themselves in the English language.
I stand corrected on the official EU stance on Israel being an apartheid state though, but give it time. You have no friends here, except for some weird right-wingers in the East. They could just as well turn against you though, so be careful in who you call your friends. Your one strong support in the West is creepy evangelical American.s
So your whataboutism still stands? You get to gag and tie down 80 year old Palestinian Americans, then abandon them on building sites when they have heartattacks because "look at those arab countries".
Great argument.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Eti Camaroff Please show me the paragraph of UNCLOS statutes that rule out that piracy is not piracy when performed by a nation. Also, you do know that piracy as a term predates the UNCLOS by centuries, right?
EDIT: I'll research this for you since you have your blinders on:
Under international law related to maritime and law-of-the-sea issues, while in
international waters, ships are subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the State in which
they are registered. Other than for a few exceptions such as suspicion of piracy, slave
trading, statelessness and unauthorized radio broadcasting (see United Nations Convention
on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) Article 110), permission must be sought and granted from
the flag-state before ships are boarded. See also Article 22(1) of the 1958 Geneva High Seas
Convention. Douglas Guilfoyle, Shipping Interdiction and the Law of the Sea, 16, 23-24
(Cambridge University Press: 2009). See UNCLOS, Articles 91 and 92. In the Lotus case, the
Permanent Court of International Justice held that “vessels on the high seas are subject to
no authority except that of the State whose flag they fly”. PCIJ Series A 1927 No. 9 at p. 25.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Cease AndDesist "drivvle"
That is not a word, you shifty stereotype. You are obviously not tired enough, since you keep on coming back for more curbstompings. The doublespeak here is projection, because I unlike you can handle a point, counter-point, further counter-point exchange, as people from civilised countries can do. Let me remind you of the shifty things you have claimed, the responses you received, and your dishonesty in not answering them, like a real mensch would anwer them:
The points:
1. A collection of fossils do not make you a paleontologist. Just as little as a collection of sea-shells makes you a marine biologist, or the first neanderthal necklace of eagle's claws made that neanderthal an ornithologist.
2. A newspaper headline is not a support of anyone's thesis.
3. "World's first paleontologist?" means something completely different than "world's first paleontologist"
4. You are a bad faith participant for removing the question-mark from that quote. We have both Googled the headline now. You know that I own you on this.
5. You can not use two scriptures that contradict each other on the age of the world, and claim they are both infalliable authorities on anything.
6. You are contradicting the Cambridge and Oxford dictionaries because you have been owned about the definition of "mentioned". You have read the dictionaries. You know that I am right and you are wrong.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kjkh3104 "you seem very angry but it's very obvious you havent even looked on other perspectives"
Strawman. I am not angry. Just tired of zionists online. Your lobby is w-e-i-r-d, that is the general gentile attitude. You even wage a PR war against Ben & Jerry's ice cream F F S. Most of you really talk as if you are one person, and considering the fact that there are real Hasbara apps that poison any online forums, 10 pro-zionists tend to be played by about 2-3 people. Right now, you are illustrating a template personality. You are now playing the: "I am really a peacenik but the situation is very difficult here on the ground. Israel really want peace, and at the end of the day we are the only democracy in the Middle East(tm), and look at our Pride parades and look at these literal Taliban next door."
"Palestine had around only 300k people in the land at the time, "
The demographics are clear. Ref: DeLaPergola and Bachi.
When they were 300K, there were only 7K-10K Jews in the land. Anybody objective will see your demographic bomb for what it really was.
Remember. For a gentile, 95% of you are deplorable alt-righters. It does not matter what role you are playing right now. I see you, and I see that you enable atrocities every day you live on that dung heap.
I've heard it all before. Go be a cliché somewhere else. Good night.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@UCPeYjbrHIOjeKvUDh-b-jEA Poll nr 1, 2 and 5 are the same Yougov poll, and Israel is not among the nations in the source material.
The rest do not include Israel either. Simply because not part of the preset. You can not get an answer about a nation you do not ask about.
"you already formed an opinion,"
Based on Israelis I have met in India, Nepal and Thailand yes. There are reasons why some Thai and Indian hotels still have signs saying that Israelis are not welcome. There are reasons why you are abhorred in Himachal Pradesh. This reflects in what Israeli media does research about later. Do a meta research if you wish. Try googling for perception of tourists from similar small countries. Belgium, Netherlands, Swiss, Norway, whatever. Notice any difference?
Mind you, I am not stating that regular adult solo travellers from Israel are bad in any way. But bring a group of people straight out of the army, have them travel in crowd in India, they are gonna be as crude and disgusting as Brits in Mallorca.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@yoav755 Spain/France/UK, we can of course cherrypick. My selection was countries similar in size "Belgium, Netherlands, Swiss (sic), Norway,
Spain has colonial enclaves, but Morocco do not have much to say about considering the invasion of Western Sahara, which has many similarities with the settlement policy of the Israeli gov. Why wouldn't they have military bases in the Canary Islands? They have been Spanish for 500+ years.
"Chavis Archipelago", you mean Chagos. We might see Chagossians receiving UK citizenship soon. Something that Israel NEVER will extend to those under their rule. Besides, nobody has ever claimed that the UK has clean hands. But at the end of the day, if Israel had Ireland, the entire Island would have been occupied still.
"Germany still benefits greatly from it's former colonies"
Namibia? Poland? Tanzania?
Dutch overseas territories poverty is a moot point. They all have access to Dutch welfare. Free healtcare. Free movement to NL.
", it still funds companies that steal African resources such as diamonds (including blood diamonds), gold, rubber, etc."
But it does not occupy. Besides, what ethnicity do the diamond merchants of Antwerp tend to have?
" crimes that those nations committed, and still commit"
When Anders Behring Breivik or some Belgian commits a terror attack, the gov does not come around demolishing their mom's homes. These nation generally do not torture. They generally do not hold people in custody for years without due process.
Case still stands. Israel is more akin to the US or Russia when it comes to atrocities. Whataboutism noted.
" I stand the point that every nation has government funded programs to push it's interest and narrative, you haven't rebutted that"
I have never claimed the opposite. But very few nations employ troll-farms. Israel does.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Military historian Aryeh Yitzhaki told The Associated Press on Wednesday that Israeli troops carried out several mass killings in 1967 in which some 1,000 Egyptian prisoners were killed in the Sinai.
Yitzhaki, who worked in the army’s history department after the war, said he and other officers collected testimony from dozens of soldiers who admitted killing POWs.
In one incident, on June 9-10, 1967, some 400 Egyptian and Palestinian prisoners were killed in the sand dunes of El Arish, Yitzhaki said. He said it began when some of the prisoners opened fire after surrendering and shot dead two Israeli soldiers.
He said Israeli soldiers ``became angry and fired at every Egyptian and Palestinian ... for several hours,″ Yitzhaki said. ``Commanders lost control over the force.″
Yitzhaki said there were six or seven other incidents in which Israeli troops opened fired on POWs, usually after ``provocations.″
Yitzhaki said a report on the killings submitted to his superiors has been locked away in a safe at military headquarters.
``The whole army leadership, including (then) Defense Minister Moshe Dayan and Chief of Staff Rabin and the generals knew about these things. No one bothered to denounce them,″ Yitzhaki said.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@crmiller1395 Military historian Aryeh Yitzhaki told The Associated Press on Wednesday that Israeli troops carried out several mass killings in 1967 in which some 1,000 Egyptian prisoners were killed in the Sinai.
Yitzhaki, who worked in the army’s history department after the war, said he and other officers collected testimony from dozens of soldiers who admitted killing POWs.
In one incident, on June 9-10, 1967, some 400 Egyptian and Palestinian prisoners were killed in the sand dunes of El Arish, Yitzhaki said. He said it began when some of the prisoners opened fire after surrendering and shot dead two Israeli soldiers.
He said Israeli soldiers ``became angry and fired at every Egyptian and Palestinian ... for several hours,″ Yitzhaki said. ``Commanders lost control over the force.″
Yitzhaki said there were six or seven other incidents in which Israeli troops opened fired on POWs, usually after ``provocations.″
Yitzhaki said a report on the killings submitted to his superiors has been locked away in a safe at military headquarters.
``The whole army leadership, including (then) Defense Minister Moshe Dayan and Chief of Staff Rabin and the generals knew about these things. No one bothered to denounce them,″ Yitzhaki said.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1