Comments by "TheEvertw" (@TheEvertw) on "MeidasTouch"
channel.
-
264
-
240
-
229
-
178
-
173
-
161
-
139
-
126
-
96
-
83
-
79
-
78
-
78
-
52
-
38
-
37
-
32
-
28
-
23
-
22
-
17
-
16
-
15
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
The USA should have learned from Europe, that a Constitution must have safeguards against parties who frustrate the democratic process. Things like voter rights and reproductive rights should have been put in concrete long ago. The Senate must either better reflect the People's will, or have less power. There must be guarantees that Congress and the Senate do their business promptly. If Congress is hung, unable to do its business, it must be possible to call for new elections. The role of Head of State and Head of Government must be separated so it becomes possible to let a government that does not have the confidence of Congress fall. Etc, etc, etc.
But the USA knew better, they were the "home of democracy". Now we have in many parts of the USA, minority rule, imposing decisions on the Public that are not supported by the majority of the People.
Time for reform. Radical Reform. Let successful democracies like France, Germany, Denmark or the Netherlands explain how it is done.
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@blktarockstar818 Sending the first letter perhaps wasn't obstruction, as it seemed Jordan was ignorant on the bounds of his authority. The second was. And his utterances on television are also obstruction of justice, as these might influence a jury on the case.
Politicians must always stay out of criminal investigations. Any involvement they have is obstruction of justice. That is why in a real democracy, politicians will ALWAYS respond with "I can't comment on an ongoing investigation", even when asked by a reporter. Which is also why in a real democracy, every politician who is indicted will step back so as to be able to defend themselves.
Except in very rare cases like the "Minder, Minder" charge against Geert Wilders in the Netherlands, where the question was about what a politician can say without it becoming a hate crime, i.e. clarifying the bounds within which a politician must operate.
18 U.S. Code § 1503 (a) "Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, endeavors to influence, intimidate, or impede any grand or petit juror, or officer in or of any court of the United State, ... shall be punished as provided in subsection b"
So it is a crime for any politician to comment on any criminal case and say "this is a witch hunt" or "politically motivated". Or, Jim Jordan calling Braggs indictment of Trump an “unprecedented abuse of prosecutorial authority." That is threatening language, and language designed to influence and intimidate.
So, respectfully, please refrain from calling for people to "research topics before making assertions", when in fact it is you who are wrong. There is plenty of evidence to indict a whole slew of MAGA politicians with regards to their Obstruction of Justice in this specific case.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Guys, it is nice to have complex discussions about why Trump's behavior is wrong, but all that is needed is the upholding of the Obstruction of Justice laws. These already make any communication that threatens any person involved in a court case, be they a judge, a clerk, the prosecution, the FBI, a jury member etc, a felony crime. The language describing the crime is quite broad, Trump's behavior certainly falls within it.
This is what is WRONG with the USA: the Law is no longer upheld when crimes are committed by the rich and powerful. When you see a person committing a serious crime, they are arrested. So why is Trump not arrested when he commits the crime of Obstruction of Justice? And if a person is out on bail, and he commits a crime, his bail is revoked. So why is Trump's bail not revoked?
Again, every day that this hood is out on the streets committing crime after crime after crime, is an indictment against the USA.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
That "hearing" with Higgins speaking just makes me wonder about the sanity of the USA. In a country with any democratic standards, he would have been shut up immediately by the chairman. Because the man is making completely unverifiable claims that should be made in a court of law, under oath, under the rule of Audi alteram partem, and in a way that gives the other party time to do their own fact finding with regards to the claims. A hearing is NOT the time to launch wild accusations, but to ask simple questions and listen to the answers. The moment Higgins refused to let the expert speak, he should have been shut up by the chairman. What is the point of a hearing if you refuse to listen to the answer? That is a violation of the principle of Audi alteram partem and thus of truth finding.
This hearing is a farce, that one would expect in a kangaroo court, not in the highest level of truth-finding in the USA. But it is all too common in congressional / senatorial committees. Committee members like Higgins are not interested in the truth, they want to grandstand and make vile accusations without any consequences if they are false.
Shameful. The USA needs to change how these hearings are held. Because this is how the People of the USA are misled. By news media that take this segment and tell it as if it is truth, which it so clearly isn't. But also in the media the accused party should have the opportunity to respond to the accusation. Audi alteram partem is also a basic journalistic principle. But journalism in the USA is just as terrible as its political system.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I do not think there is a theological answer as to why the American church has backsliden this badly. The closest you will get is warnings in the NT against e.g. wolves in sheep's clothing, who are people trying to mislead the Church.
The theological explanation is that the American Church has replaced the Biblical Jesus with a "god" of their own making, be that America or Trump. The moment it did that, it left the confines of Theology and became detached from Christianity.
Many of the tenents of the "evangelicals" are directly opposite to the Teachings of Jesus. Much of it is from fear, fear of violence, fear of being persecution, fear of foreigners, etc. The Bible says "Whatever is not from faith is sin". So, packing heat, and voting Trump because you fear Wokeism, are sins. And a church that preaches these are not the Church of Christ.
1
-
1
-
That MAGA has been twisting Christianity is obvious, at least to me. Thank you for dissecting it, because far too many Christians have been deceived. Good also to expose the evil work of Opus Dei.
There is so much wrong with this Opus Dei / MAGA infected "christianity":
* They are afraid of persecution. There is no reason for Christians to be afraid of persecution: that is part of being a real Christian.
* They believe Trump will "save" christianity. But there is no vacancy for a "saviour" in Christianity, that position has been filled for 2 thousand years already. To propose a second "saviour" is literal sacrilege & idolatry.
* They believe God will punish them for abortions. But God has made very clear that he will not punish the righteous for the acts of the ungodly.
* They presume they have the right to create laws for unbelievers. That concept is anti-Christian. The Law has no power to increase godliness, and a Christian has no authority to judge others. Period. Do not judge lest you be judged.
* Same for their attitude against the LGBTQ+ community. God told us to LOVE people, not to judge them according to their sexual preferences.
* They are afraid of immigrants and want to treat them badly. But according to Matthew 25, how you treat immigrants is one of the tests God applies to see who follows him or not.
* They believe Christians & the Church should govern the country. But the separation of Church and State is something Jesus himself instituted: "My Kingdom is not of this world, otherwise my disciples would fight". Jesus Himself submitted to the secular authorities, without trying to replace them. Woe to anyone who thinks they can do what Jesus Himself refused to do. There will be a time when the Church takes over power, but that will be AFTER THE SECOND COMING, and it will not be "the church" grabbing power, it will be Jesus Himself. Any "church" that tries to take secular power, or any secular leader who thinks he is doing God's work is an enemy of Christ. This is the biggest heresy that the Catholics have embraced and which has caused much, much evil against humanity. Think inquisition. The USA is heading straight for it, if you let these people fulfill their designs.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I hope the Democrats are ready to take an amendment to the Constitution to Congress, it may well be that the Voters will give them a mandate to put an end to the rot. Like making explicit in the Constitution that EVERYBODY is subject to the Federal Law, including the President, SCOTUS, Senators and Representatives, when acting in function as well as when not. That means that e.g. SCOTUS is subject to emoluments and anti-corruption laws, which would mean the end for at least two of them.
And to boot, they should put a hard limit on any donations, promises or loans in money or kind any legal entity can give to a political party, an individual politician or that would benefit their campaign(s) in a single year. A limit of 1,000 USD sounds reasonable.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You are so right in calling out how anti-Christian the MAGA movement is. I am a Christian man, and I am disgusted by them. They are the literal opposite of Christ: selfish, hateful, spiteful, arrogant, angry, have no respect for others, violent, bullies. They are EVIL.
The first thing that Trump did as President, in his inaugural speech, was dedicate the country to Greed and Selfishness. That was a demonic act. Anyone who says or preaches that Trump would lead the USA back to Christ is either deluded, or serving Satan outright.
If you love Jesus, you can not vote Republican.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"God help us"
You will need it. The USA is very, very, very slow in upholding the Rule of Law with regards to Trump. To deserve the name "democracy", the Law MUST be upheld regardless of who breaks the Law. The Rule of Law is a conditio sine qua non for democracy. Which is why Lady Justice is always displayed with a blindfold on. Well, in the USA that blindfold is not just worn thin, it has holes in it. It is in tatters.
It is obvious Trump has blatantly broken the law many many times, we have all seen him literally break the Law dozens of times live on TV. Yet he still walks around a free man. THAT CAN NOT BE in a democracy. And that is not even mentioning the many ways in which Trump acted unconstitutionally towards Congress, rejecting any Congressional Oversight, not co-operating with the peaceful transfer of power, interfering with Justice, giving pardons for money, etc, etc, etc, which are extremely serious matters against which the USA needs to protect itself in the future.
Shame, USA. Shame on you.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1