Comments by "TheEvertw" (@TheEvertw) on "MeidasTouch" channel.

  1. 264
  2. 240
  3. 229
  4. 178
  5. 173
  6. 161
  7. 139
  8. 126
  9. 96
  10. 83
  11. 79
  12. 78
  13. 78
  14. 52
  15. 38
  16. 37
  17. 32
  18. 28
  19. 23
  20. 22
  21. 17
  22. 16
  23. 15
  24. 14
  25. 13
  26. 13
  27. 12
  28. 11
  29. 10
  30. 10
  31. 10
  32. 9
  33. 9
  34. 8
  35. 8
  36. 8
  37. 7
  38. 7
  39. 7
  40. 7
  41. 7
  42. 7
  43. 7
  44. 6
  45. 6
  46. 6
  47. 6
  48. 5
  49. 5
  50. 5
  51. 5
  52. 5
  53. 5
  54. 4
  55. 4
  56. 4
  57. 4
  58. 4
  59. 4
  60. 4
  61. 4
  62. 4
  63. 3
  64. 3
  65. 3
  66. 3
  67. 3
  68. 3
  69. 3
  70. 3
  71. 3
  72. 3
  73. 3
  74. 3
  75. 3
  76. 3
  77. 3
  78. 3
  79. 3
  80. 2
  81. 2
  82. 2
  83. 2
  84. 2
  85. 2
  86. 2
  87. 2
  88. 2
  89. 2
  90. 2
  91. 2
  92. 2
  93. ​ @blktarockstar818  Sending the first letter perhaps wasn't obstruction, as it seemed Jordan was ignorant on the bounds of his authority. The second was. And his utterances on television are also obstruction of justice, as these might influence a jury on the case. Politicians must always stay out of criminal investigations. Any involvement they have is obstruction of justice. That is why in a real democracy, politicians will ALWAYS respond with "I can't comment on an ongoing investigation", even when asked by a reporter. Which is also why in a real democracy, every politician who is indicted will step back so as to be able to defend themselves. Except in very rare cases like the "Minder, Minder" charge against Geert Wilders in the Netherlands, where the question was about what a politician can say without it becoming a hate crime, i.e. clarifying the bounds within which a politician must operate. 18 U.S. Code § 1503 (a) "Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, endeavors to influence, intimidate, or impede any grand or petit juror, or officer in or of any court of the United State, ... shall be punished as provided in subsection b" So it is a crime for any politician to comment on any criminal case and say "this is a witch hunt" or "politically motivated". Or, Jim Jordan calling Braggs indictment of Trump an “unprecedented abuse of prosecutorial authority." That is threatening language, and language designed to influence and intimidate. So, respectfully, please refrain from calling for people to "research topics before making assertions", when in fact it is you who are wrong. There is plenty of evidence to indict a whole slew of MAGA politicians with regards to their Obstruction of Justice in this specific case.
    2
  94. 2
  95. 2
  96. 2
  97. 2
  98. 2
  99. 2
  100. 2
  101. 2
  102. 2
  103. 2
  104. 2
  105. 2
  106. 2
  107. 2
  108. 2
  109. 2
  110. 2
  111. 2
  112. 2
  113. 2
  114. 2
  115. 2
  116. 2
  117. 2
  118. 2
  119. 2
  120. 2
  121. 2
  122. 2
  123. 2
  124. 2
  125. 2
  126. 2
  127. 2
  128. 2
  129. 2
  130. 2
  131. 2
  132. 2
  133. 2
  134. 2
  135. 2
  136. 2
  137. 2
  138. 2
  139. 2
  140. 2
  141. 1
  142. 1
  143. 1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146. 1
  147. 1
  148. 1
  149. 1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152. 1
  153. 1
  154. 1
  155. 1
  156. 1
  157. 1
  158. 1
  159. 1
  160. 1
  161. 1
  162. 1
  163. 1
  164. 1
  165. 1
  166. 1
  167. 1
  168. 1
  169. 1
  170. 1
  171. 1
  172. 1
  173. 1
  174. 1
  175. 1
  176. 1
  177. 1
  178. 1
  179. 1
  180. 1
  181. 1
  182. 1
  183. 1
  184. 1
  185. 1
  186. 1
  187. 1
  188. 1
  189. 1
  190. 1
  191. 1
  192. 1
  193. 1
  194. 1
  195. 1
  196. 1
  197. 1
  198. 1
  199. 1
  200. 1
  201. 1
  202. 1
  203. 1
  204. 1
  205. 1
  206. 1
  207. 1
  208. 1
  209. 1
  210. 1
  211. 1
  212. 1
  213. 1
  214. 1
  215. 1
  216. 1
  217. 1
  218. 1
  219. 1
  220. 1
  221. 1
  222. 1
  223. 1
  224. 1
  225. 1
  226. 1
  227. 1
  228. 1
  229. 1
  230. 1
  231. 1
  232. 1
  233. 1
  234. 1
  235. 1
  236. 1
  237. 1
  238. 1
  239. 1
  240. 1
  241. 1
  242. 1
  243. 1
  244. 1
  245. 1
  246. 1
  247. 1
  248. 1
  249. 1
  250. 1
  251. 1
  252. 1
  253. 1
  254. 1
  255. 1
  256. 1
  257. 1
  258. 1
  259. 1
  260. 1
  261. 1
  262. 1
  263. 1
  264. 1
  265. 1
  266. 1
  267. 1
  268. 1
  269. 1
  270. 1
  271. 1
  272. 1
  273. 1
  274. 1
  275. 1
  276. 1
  277. 1
  278. 1
  279. 1
  280. 1
  281. 1
  282. 1
  283. 1
  284. 1
  285. 1
  286. 1
  287. 1
  288. 1
  289. 1
  290. 1
  291. 1
  292. 1
  293. 1
  294. 1
  295. 1
  296. 1
  297. 1
  298. 1
  299. 1
  300. 1
  301. 1
  302. 1
  303. 1
  304. 1
  305. 1
  306. 1
  307. 1
  308. 1
  309. 1
  310. 1
  311. 1
  312. 1
  313. 1
  314. 1
  315. 1
  316. 1
  317. 1
  318. 1
  319. 1
  320. 1
  321. 1
  322. 1
  323. 1
  324. 1
  325. 1
  326. 1
  327. 1
  328. 1
  329. 1
  330. 1
  331. 1
  332. 1
  333. 1
  334. 1
  335. 1
  336. 1
  337. 1
  338. 1
  339. 1
  340. 1
  341. 1
  342. 1
  343. 1
  344. 1
  345. 1
  346. 1
  347. 1
  348. 1
  349. 1
  350. 1
  351. 1
  352. 1
  353. 1
  354. 1
  355. 1
  356. 1
  357. 1
  358. 1
  359. 1
  360. 1
  361. 1
  362. 1
  363. 1
  364. 1
  365. 1
  366. 1
  367. 1
  368. 1
  369. 1
  370. 1
  371. 1
  372. 1
  373. 1
  374. 1
  375. 1
  376. 1
  377. 1
  378. 1
  379. 1
  380. That "hearing" with Higgins speaking just makes me wonder about the sanity of the USA. In a country with any democratic standards, he would have been shut up immediately by the chairman. Because the man is making completely unverifiable claims that should be made in a court of law, under oath, under the rule of Audi alteram partem, and in a way that gives the other party time to do their own fact finding with regards to the claims. A hearing is NOT the time to launch wild accusations, but to ask simple questions and listen to the answers. The moment Higgins refused to let the expert speak, he should have been shut up by the chairman. What is the point of a hearing if you refuse to listen to the answer? That is a violation of the principle of Audi alteram partem and thus of truth finding. This hearing is a farce, that one would expect in a kangaroo court, not in the highest level of truth-finding in the USA. But it is all too common in congressional / senatorial committees. Committee members like Higgins are not interested in the truth, they want to grandstand and make vile accusations without any consequences if they are false. Shameful. The USA needs to change how these hearings are held. Because this is how the People of the USA are misled. By news media that take this segment and tell it as if it is truth, which it so clearly isn't. But also in the media the accused party should have the opportunity to respond to the accusation. Audi alteram partem is also a basic journalistic principle. But journalism in the USA is just as terrible as its political system.
    1
  381. 1
  382. 1
  383. 1
  384. 1
  385. 1
  386. 1
  387. 1
  388. 1
  389. 1
  390. 1
  391. 1
  392. 1
  393. 1
  394. 1
  395. 1
  396. 1
  397. 1
  398. 1
  399. 1
  400. 1
  401. 1
  402. 1
  403. 1
  404. 1
  405. 1
  406. 1
  407. 1
  408. 1
  409. 1
  410. 1
  411. 1
  412. 1
  413. 1
  414. 1
  415. 1
  416. 1
  417. 1
  418. 1
  419. 1
  420. 1
  421. That MAGA has been twisting Christianity is obvious, at least to me. Thank you for dissecting it, because far too many Christians have been deceived. Good also to expose the evil work of Opus Dei. There is so much wrong with this Opus Dei / MAGA infected "christianity": * They are afraid of persecution. There is no reason for Christians to be afraid of persecution: that is part of being a real Christian. * They believe Trump will "save" christianity. But there is no vacancy for a "saviour" in Christianity, that position has been filled for 2 thousand years already. To propose a second "saviour" is literal sacrilege & idolatry. * They believe God will punish them for abortions. But God has made very clear that he will not punish the righteous for the acts of the ungodly. * They presume they have the right to create laws for unbelievers. That concept is anti-Christian. The Law has no power to increase godliness, and a Christian has no authority to judge others. Period. Do not judge lest you be judged. * Same for their attitude against the LGBTQ+ community. God told us to LOVE people, not to judge them according to their sexual preferences. * They are afraid of immigrants and want to treat them badly. But according to Matthew 25, how you treat immigrants is one of the tests God applies to see who follows him or not. * They believe Christians & the Church should govern the country. But the separation of Church and State is something Jesus himself instituted: "My Kingdom is not of this world, otherwise my disciples would fight". Jesus Himself submitted to the secular authorities, without trying to replace them. Woe to anyone who thinks they can do what Jesus Himself refused to do. There will be a time when the Church takes over power, but that will be AFTER THE SECOND COMING, and it will not be "the church" grabbing power, it will be Jesus Himself. Any "church" that tries to take secular power, or any secular leader who thinks he is doing God's work is an enemy of Christ. This is the biggest heresy that the Catholics have embraced and which has caused much, much evil against humanity. Think inquisition. The USA is heading straight for it, if you let these people fulfill their designs.
    1
  422. 1
  423. 1
  424. 1
  425. 1
  426. 1
  427. 1
  428. 1
  429. 1
  430. 1
  431. 1
  432. 1
  433. 1
  434. 1
  435. 1
  436. 1
  437. 1
  438. 1
  439. 1
  440. 1
  441. 1
  442. 1
  443. 1
  444. 1
  445. 1
  446. 1
  447. 1
  448. 1
  449. 1
  450. 1
  451. 1
  452. 1
  453. 1
  454. 1
  455. 1
  456. 1
  457. 1
  458. 1
  459. 1
  460. 1
  461. 1
  462. 1
  463. 1
  464. 1
  465. 1
  466. 1
  467. 1
  468. 1
  469. 1
  470. 1
  471. 1
  472. 1
  473. 1
  474. 1
  475. 1
  476. 1
  477. 1
  478. 1
  479. 1
  480. 1
  481. 1
  482. 1
  483. 1
  484. 1
  485. 1
  486. 1
  487. 1
  488. 1
  489. 1
  490. 1
  491. 1
  492. 1
  493. 1
  494. 1
  495. 1
  496. 1
  497. 1
  498. 1
  499. 1
  500. 1
  501. 1
  502. 1
  503. 1
  504. 1
  505. 1
  506. 1
  507. 1
  508. 1
  509. 1
  510. 1
  511. 1
  512. 1
  513. 1
  514. 1
  515. 1
  516. 1
  517. 1
  518. 1
  519. 1
  520. 1
  521. 1
  522. 1
  523. 1
  524. 1
  525. 1
  526. 1
  527. 1
  528. 1
  529. 1
  530. 1
  531. 1
  532. 1
  533. 1
  534. 1
  535. 1
  536. 1
  537. 1
  538. 1
  539. 1
  540. 1
  541. 1
  542. 1
  543. 1
  544. 1
  545. 1
  546. 1
  547. 1
  548. 1
  549. 1
  550. 1