Comments by "Kantrel 7" (@blumiu2426) on "Candace Owens RAGES On Steven Crowder! Gets ROASTED On Timcast IRL By Chat" video.

  1. He said they were controlled opposition and gagged by contract. You are being willingly ignorant.
    7
  2. Everyone is forgetting Crowder said everyone at the DW was being quite because they couldn't speak due to their contract. The moment he suggests they are sellouts and controlled, he did attack them indirectly. He's not stupid, he did the same thing by naming-not naming the Daily Wire. The moment they defend themselves and speak up, even saying the Daily Wire isn't perfect, people then switch to them being sent to attack Crowder. Willing ignorance and blind loyalty is all I'm seeing. I don't agree with Candace on not criticizing a friend when they are wrong, but no one is mentioning any of the points she raised while pissed. She clearly stated she was pissed, so she isn't going to present the best image. I get the ideology Crowder wants, but then he goes about it in the worst way imaginable and character- destroying methods. I can't trust anyone like that while supposedly saying the people you did it to are friends. You don't accuse friends of being controlled opposition; that's double-speak. You either consider them an enemy, you don't like their business and walk away, but don't call them friends to appear innocent. You all rally behind a person, not an ideal or position. It's no different than the left making government their god. The weakness is exposed and all those in intelligence have to do now is slip in and whisper exactly what people want to hear. It's pathetic.
    1
  3.  @testudo2185  She runs her own show...
    1
  4.  @armondtanz  You realize he was making it up, right?
    1
  5. You sound like a lefty that "suggests" something while meaning it.
    1
  6.  @dweld2144  It's not a personal attack to say someone is a sellout and controlled like a dog? Seriously? No attack on their character and free will? You must be doing some mental gymnastics not to see it
    1
  7.  @SgtImrak93  No idea what you mean by that or why you're exaggerating that much.
    1
  8.  @bye92  Fairly certain I explained it twice already in this thread. You sound like a Progressive on Twitter with that immature reply. Grow up.
    1
  9.  @LMoney4  If you think all personal attacks are direct, I can't help you. Either that, you are like the low testosterone guys running around acting like women. You don't need to call names, attacking people's credibility and character is more common. You should know, Progressives do it all the time. That is ignorant with abundant examples up to this point. Because someone you like does it, you don't see it? You're no different than them, just on the opposite side.
    1
  10. @gmualum08 So again. Let's use deductive reasoning. Putting someone's character, reputation to question isn't a personal attack. Then what is it? What is the impact then? To call that person into question. Not their friend, pet, but themselves. If it directly involves them and putting them in a negative light, it's a attack on their person. Who they are. A personal attack. I shouldn't have to break this down like you're a child. When the Democrats called Trump's character into question the right sees it immediately as a personal attack, but you're suddenly unable to here???
    1
  11.  @matthewwolf90  If Crowder suggested those working for DW were bought out and unwilling to speak up because of the contract, working for company that was "big con", you don't think that's personal? Calling your integrity into question or say cowardice is behind it? Use logic.
    1