Comments by "Kantrel 7" (@blumiu2426) on "This e-mail exposes everything" video.

  1. 8
  2. 7
  3. 7
  4. 4
  5. 4
  6. 3
  7. 3
  8. 3
  9. 3
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19.  @PikeBishop1  You're just repeating what I said with the first comment. That was my point. What we know of written history is what we learned from and parts of unwritten that were later written down and not so far back no longer recalled. Look at Africa. Geographically is lacks many resources that Europe has. Fertile land, that leads to cattle and agriculture. There is no spreading desert to threaten this. When you have those foundations, it leads to steady comforts and time and ability not to focus on every day survival, but other endeavors. This should be basic understanding. Funny, I recall Asian countries being considered safer, not white. How many instances of violence have occurred in Europe? Wars and so on compared to Asia. Don't forget the exporting of that to other places in the world. Just because they took slavery and colonization to other places besides homeland doesn't mean it lacked it. Every culture has done it, but one primary group has been the more active in spreading it around the world in various ways, today that is primarily through political intrigue and warmongering. And if you want to stick to modern times, we can mention the rape of resources from other countries that America and Europe have benefitted from that effected countries are left destitute for. There is a reason so many cultures are willing to go after white people when it itself has in truth been a primary actor in trying to dismantle other nations and cultures for gain of some kind. It doesn't make it right, but this is reaping what is sown and everyone that looks the same has to pay for it. European countries are documented for various forms of domestic abuse, a large degree incest in these supposed safe and peaceful places. The more decadent a people, the more immoral they become and if white people are seen to have benefitted more, then they are the more prolific partakers of such things. One need only look on the clear and dark web to see this. Who makes up most of academia and pushed a racist evolutionary theory? It valued philosophical and inherent paganized thinking that leads to immorality and another form of the decadent depravity seen in those of power. No matter the race, there are two sides to every coin. For every pro you think one has contributed, there is a con as well. For every boon, there is a ugly truth to how it was gained. Never be too quick to praise one self and forget the devil is in the details. The irony is other ethnic groups should know this, but when the shoe seems to be on the other foot, the same mistakes repeat. Human nature is corrupt.
    2
  20.  @PikeBishop1  Atlantis is considered fiction still. And no, Europeans did not create the modern world in the sense you're trying to paint it. What it contributed from Rome, Greece to some extent were inherent, but philosophy and academics already existed in places they came into contact with. They shared information and ideas that later led to what came later. Recall that Asia was civilized and developed compared to Europe long before, and Africa had Egypt as it's cultural and academic mecca. Anyone that remained tribal was due to their civilization being conquered, stunted by conflict, lack of resources as stated or chose such based on tradition/religion. About every developed nation was built on slavery as it was as common as war and other aspects of life. If it exported or imported slaves, it used that wealth to build it's walls and wealth, so no nation can ever claim to be built solely on self innovation. That's the height of arrogance that leads to social class structures and prejudice in the first place. When Europe was still tribes and clans, Asia had it's empires. Does that make them superior? Why then does evolution rank them behind the Caucasian if the Asian did things first? Then it gets muddy because of the inklings of advancements in ancient cultures we cannot replicate today. They weren't lesser because they didn't have the ease of technology, they were far smarter with what tools they had. Also, city society was not always the goal of every culture in the world. Some preferred to live on the land or just lacked the destructive ambition to advance what is always first war, that leading to invention. In that light it is almost as if you are saying white people are naturally more destructive and not driven to improve the world, but to advance in greed and domination in perceived superiority.
    2
  21. 2
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1