Comments by "JerseyMikeP" (@JerseyMikeP) on "Donut"
channel.
-
390
-
280
-
251
-
74
-
29
-
27
-
27
-
24
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
18
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Adodoes, It was a Rev-limiter that was removed....From the Road&track link below.
"The car used for the record was McLaren's fifth experimental prototype, or XP5 in McLaren speak, which was five years old at the time.
On his first run Wallace hit an indicated 388 km/h (241.1 mph), but he knew the car had a bit more to give.
(((((He asked the technicians for more revs, and set out again. With the rev limiter removed, he hit 391 km/h (242.956 mph), and called it a day.)))))
"It will not go any more than 391," said Wallace. "But anyway, 391's quite fast, isn't it?"
Quite.
Top speed records are averaged between two runs in opposite direction to account for wind, so the McLaren's official top speed record calculated out to 240.1 mph. That record has since been beaten by the Bugatti Veyron and others, but the F1 remains the fastest naturally aspirated production car ever built. "
https://www.roadandtrack.com/car-culture/classic-cars/videos/a32423/mclaren-f1-top-speed-record-history/
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"Yeah, it's fast and it handles well, but it sucks at pretty much everything else." ....It's a sports coupe. That's what really matters...unless you are a Mustang guy...then how loud it is matters more, LOL.
MPG wise the More powerful 455hp Camaro is rated higher than the 435hp GT. Whats worse is the Heavy 485hp SRT Challenger has the same rating as the GT.
( https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2017-chevrolet-camaro-in-depth-model-review-2017-chevrolet-camaro-fuel-economy-review-car-and-driver-page-3)
I wouldn't call any pony car a Grand tourer...those are usually heavier cars with "not so good handling" that are good at autobahn high speed cruising...like Aston Martins, F12s, Rs7.
Compared to the last Gen camaro the current one is WAY better.
Looks are personal preference... And this one looks ALOT better than the last gen
"Crappy Interior".......looking at the comparison pics...I'd choose the camaros... instrument cluster is WAY better, (POD Guages on the mustang) are so out dated.
https://cars.usnews.com/dims4/USNEWS/652f3a7/2147483647/resize/640x420%3E/format/jpeg/quality/85/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcars.usnews.com%2Fstatic%2Fimages%2Farticle%2F201709%2F127185%2F5_-_2017_Ford_Mustang_GT_640x420.jpg
vs.
https://icdn3.digitaltrends.com/image/2016-chevrolet-camaro-017-2-1500x1000.jpg?ver=1
and as for the interior.."EVERYTHING" is made of plastic... BMWs, Porsches, mustangs, camaros, hondas, etc.
"...a nearly non-existent trunk, ..."
Trunk space really?? That matters more than performance? If that was what counts...The mustang only fit 1 extra carry on bag than the camaro and BOTH held less than the challenger.
Yes rear visiblity sucks....But you'd only be looking at the Front end of the Mustang anyway;-)
( https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2017-chevrolet-camaro-in-depth-model-review-2017-chevrolet-camaro-cargo-space-and-storage-review-car-and-driver-page-7 )
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1