Comments by "JerseyMikeP" (@JerseyMikeP) on "Why doesn't Ford make a Corvette competitor? | WheelHouse" video.

  1. 251
  2. 29
  3. 11
  4. 6
  5. 6
  6. 5
  7. 5
  8. 5
  9. 4
  10. 4
  11. 4
  12. 3
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. 2
  20. 2
  21. 2
  22. 2
  23. 2
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 2
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1
  51. 1
  52. "Yeah, it's fast and it handles well, but it sucks at pretty much everything else." ....It's a sports coupe. That's what really matters...unless you are a Mustang guy...then how loud it is matters more, LOL. MPG wise the More powerful 455hp Camaro is rated higher than the 435hp GT. Whats worse is the Heavy 485hp SRT Challenger has the same rating as the GT. ( https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2017-chevrolet-camaro-in-depth-model-review-2017-chevrolet-camaro-fuel-economy-review-car-and-driver-page-3) I wouldn't call any pony car a Grand tourer...those are usually heavier cars with "not so good handling" that are good at autobahn high speed cruising...like Aston Martins, F12s, Rs7. Compared to the last Gen camaro the current one is WAY better. Looks are personal preference... And this one looks ALOT better than the last gen "Crappy Interior".......looking at the comparison pics...I'd choose the camaros... instrument cluster is WAY better, (POD Guages on the mustang) are so out dated. https://cars.usnews.com/dims4/USNEWS/652f3a7/2147483647/resize/640x420%3E/format/jpeg/quality/85/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcars.usnews.com%2Fstatic%2Fimages%2Farticle%2F201709%2F127185%2F5_-_2017_Ford_Mustang_GT_640x420.jpg vs. https://icdn3.digitaltrends.com/image/2016-chevrolet-camaro-017-2-1500x1000.jpg?ver=1 and as for the interior.."EVERYTHING" is made of plastic... BMWs, Porsches, mustangs, camaros, hondas, etc. "...a nearly non-existent trunk, ..." Trunk space really?? That matters more than performance? If that was what counts...The mustang only fit 1 extra carry on bag than the camaro and BOTH held less than the challenger. Yes rear visiblity sucks....But you'd only be looking at the Front end of the Mustang anyway;-) ( https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2017-chevrolet-camaro-in-depth-model-review-2017-chevrolet-camaro-cargo-space-and-storage-review-car-and-driver-page-7 )
    1
  53. 1
  54. 1
  55. 1
  56. 1
  57. 1
  58. 1
  59. 1
  60. 1
  61. 1
  62. 1
  63. 1
  64. 1
  65. 1
  66. 1
  67. 1
  68. 1
  69. 1
  70. 1
  71. 1
  72. 1
  73. 1
  74. 1
  75. 1
  76. 1
  77. 1
  78. 1
  79. 1
  80. 1
  81. 1
  82. 1
  83. 1
  84. 1
  85. 1
  86. 1
  87. 1
  88. 1
  89. 1
  90. 1
  91. 1
  92. 1
  93. 1
  94. 1
  95. 1
  96. 1
  97. 1
  98. 1
  99. 1
  100. 1
  101. 1
  102. 1
  103. 1
  104. 1
  105. 1
  106. 1
  107. 1
  108. 1
  109. 1