Comments by "BaltimoreAndOhioRR" (@BaltimoreAndOhioRR) on "Fox News"
channel.
-
650
-
548
-
386
-
373
-
228
-
181
-
154
-
138
-
113
-
104
-
70
-
65
-
64
-
57
-
52
-
49
-
44
-
42
-
38
-
36
-
36
-
32
-
27
-
26
-
24
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
I'm in the same boat, over the years I worked overtime to buy a few modestly priced rowhomes around my area. A couple are paid off, the rest are not. I pay a management company to find tenants, collect rent, and handle repairs. Since the covid, my management company has been basically AWOL with only a couple of responses to all my inquiries -"we're out of the office", "one of our office members contacted covid", "we're not collecting rent, so we're not receiving any money either".... , and those were from only the few times they actually answered. My banks have halted the mortgages, luckily, due to govt help (I still have to repay the money eventually), but i'm still responsible for paying the city property taxes on the houses that are paid off. If I don't, I will lose the houses.
Since my rental company is virtually non-existent, a couple of the houses have been vacant this whole time (one tenant skipped out last year), and there have been no new tenants. I have gotten fines for "tall grass" and people dumping trash in the alley behind the house at two of the vacant properties and one of the occupied ones. The city sends the fine to me -not the tenant, nor the management company. The fines are subject to liens, which means I MUST pay them in order to sell the house or basically anything else having to do with the house. I am bleeding money, but since I am not a business, I dont qualify for any of the covid business relief, and since being a landlord isnt considered a job, I cant apply for unemployment benefits. I'm assuming the rental management company CAN get govt help, since it is an actual business. And it's employees can get unemployment. But I get nothing, because I'm neither a business nor a worker. But Biden can tell me I have to let what tenants I have, stay there without paying rent, and I have to pay taxes to the govt for the privilege of doing so. 👿
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
JoeyTheRedKangaroo You have not supported your statements.
It is simply asinine to assume that requiring an ID to vote is racist. You know that, I know that, and everyone with an IQ over 80 knows that.
The Democrats only reject voter ID laws because they could hinder their methods of voter fraud, such as having illegals voting, dead people voting, voting in multiple precincts, and multiple votes per person.
Like I said, if you and other Democrats think it's so 'racist', why are you OK with requiring ID for ANYTHING else?
If blacks cant obtain an ID for voting, then they also cant obtain an ID for other things - so why dont you Democrats petition for the removal of ALL ID requirements, since they are so racist?
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
shut up with the idiotic bigotry propaganda, go back to strumming your guitar and smoking pot while voting for hillary or bernie. anyone who would do that cant be a republican.
ps. the reason there is devisiveness in the party, is because for years we've elected 'republicans' who talked a good talk to get elected, then did NOTHING of consequence to stop obama and his liberal, socialist, agenda. they only time they would 'stand' against him was when they knew they didnt have enough votes to actually effect any change. they also did nothing to garner support from working, middle class, normal people who see this country getting invaded by illegals and slowly turning into a third world socialist country, where we spend more time debating how to allow men into the ladies restrooms than we do bringing middle eastern Muslims into our country!
THATS why Trump is getting the nomination and all you old time, oblivious, worthless, so-called republicans are a thing of the past.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Sean Kerr in fox's defense, the 'news reporter' in this video is not a reporter, he is a commentator. his job is to tell his opinion, and get a conversation started. he is very open about his views, and doesn't try to hide them.
he does not pretend to be non-biased, and that is not the point of this program.
however, all the other major channels are just as biased in the other direction - and THEY pretend they are non-biased. they claim to present the news without bias when they are so obviously liberal, leftist, democrats.
because fox is the ONLY channel to present the 'right' side, when all other channels present the left, fox stands out as being overly biased to many people, especially with their commentary shows. but at least the are honest about that.
the other channels very often present their commentary as legitimate, un-biased 'news'.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@JimstrVids Wow.... a simple Google inquiry: "If you are single and a wage earner with an annual salary of $30,000, your federal income tax liability will be approximately $2,5001. You will also pay approximately $2,300 in social security and medicare tax1. According to another source, you will pay $1,718 in federal tax on a $30,000 salary in 2023. The total taxes you will pay depend on various factors, but according to yet another source, if you made $30,000 gross, your total taxes will be $3,860."
Even after standard deduction/credit, the person will still have a taxable income (in the lowest bracket).
Even if you're "almost sure" the person will GET money from the govt, it wont be more than how much was paid TO the govt during the year.
State taxes and laws vary widely, all over, so can't be calculated in this argument.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@igvc1876 Well to be clear, I am not Derek , to whom you asked the question. I saw your question and it reeks of sarcasm, so I decided to insert myself into the comment stream. Im sorry for butting in when I wasnt asked. If you are sincere, I suspect you are not from the USA? Maybe you honestly dont understand our economics? Obviously I can not answer the question for Derek. Since you just asked me, I will answer for myself. Yes, I believe they should be lower (maybe eliminated). The individuals already pay taxes. The people that run the corporations all pay income taxes. The shareholders pay taxes on the profits on their shares.Raising taxes on the corporations just makes the corporation raise its prices, lower it's services/quality, or cut it's employment expenses (workers salaries/benefits). Or they move overseas where they can pay less taxes and less employment expenses. Why make things harder on corporations and drive them away? We should be doing things to welcome corporations and encourage them to expand and employ more people! Raising their taxes doesnt do that. (and the taxes that all of Bernie's proposals would require would put them all out of business anyway).
As an example, many of our big cities build stadiums and offer tax-free contracts and agreements to encourage the owners of sports teams to place their team in that city. The city doesnt make their money off the TAXES from that owner (the team corporation), but it makes its money off all the taxes from the commerce (sales tax) that the team brings into the city, and all the income taxes of the individuals who now have jobs due to the sports team. Everyone from the players who move into town, to the people who build the stadium, to the vendors in the stadium, to the small businesses around the stadium (even parking lot owners), all pay taxes on their increased income due to the sports team.
So its was to the city's benefit to forego the initial, easy tax grab directly from the team (or the teams owner), and give him/them a break on those taxes in order to create employment and generate a steady stream of regular income tax receipts.
Also, if the city did not give the owners incentives to come , the owner would instead go to some other city that did.
Just the same way rules, regulations, and taxes are pushing so many corporations out of our country now.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@Domo-yo4pz The difference is that before, mail in voting was done by registered people who actually went through the process to request it, for a reason. This "new" system pushed by the Democrats sends out ballots to EVERYONE , whether they requested them or not, whether they are expecting to receive them or not, whether their address has been verified or not.
It was good to give the opportunity to people traveling, or in the military, or in the hospital, the chance vote when they couldnt get to the voting station IF THEY REQUESTED it and filled out the proper forms.
But sending mass voting forms/ballots to everyone "at their last known address" just opens up incredible opportunities for fraudulent ballots being sent in. Most people can figure this out, but the so-called news stations, Democrats, and internet trolls try to act like there's no difference.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Will Wright
thats like saying the neanderthal was the most advanced because it learned to grunt to convey meanings. white man clearly has made the most advancements in all of civilization - medicine, electronics, nuclear physics, space travel, deep sea exploration, etc...
what you say about the moors is debatable, i wont get into that, but even if what you claim is true, evidently their race stopped evolving - or even started DE-volving - to what we have today.
and as i asked already, what happened to the moors? according to the pro-blacks, the moors were nearly surper-human! so where are they today??
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Will Wright you come across as a pompous moron. someone who has just enough education to spew some facts to support your stance, but not enough to put it all together and really know what you're talking about.
many posts above, you told me all the things that the moors did (to advance modern civilization). i have also heard similar claims from black racists throughout the internet.
the picture is painted that they were the smartest race of beings to ever live!
they were also the most advanced and cunning warriors (cant remember if you said that specifically, but its often stated on the internet).
while i will agree that throughout history, black peoples were seldom given proper accolades for their achievements, i do think the pendulum is swinging too far the other way, now.
especially the black racists, latch on to that moor story and run with it, expanding and adding to it any way they can.
the fact is, while of course there have been extraordinary black people throughout history, even advanced and propserous groups, tribes, whatever you'd call them in earlier times, as a whole, they have failed.
all other races have surpassed them. im not saying this just to be racist. ive honestly thought about it and tried to debunk some of the real racist stuff ive seen on the net.
but it's true. the Asians have prospered. the whites have prospered and become the most advanced, dominate race. the Hispanics , while not being dominate or particularly advanced, at least have formed govts and do well getting along with the rest of the world.
what have blacks done? other than british rule, the countries in africa are barely more advanced than 100's of years ago.
end aparthied, what happens? more warring and killing, just as primitive times.
white people have russia, england, france, the US, germany, etc..
asians have korea, japan, even china.
all highly advanced, industrialized, modern civilized countries, run by their own people.
why are there no similar black countries? all moderately successful black countries were/are run by other (white) countries.
other than individual blacks becoming successful -usually by coming to a white country - there are NO (or extremely few very samll) fully successful black cultures around today.
im sorry, this does sound quite racist, but its just the truth about how the world is.
as i said, even if there were highly advanced, above-all-else black cultures back in the early times, where are they today? what have they done? why are all the black african countries so under-developed? especially the ones that werent under white-rule!
why isnt there a world-dominate first world 'superpower' that is black-run, like US, Japan, Russia, germany, china?
according to the history you told me, by this time in our world's history, surely some african country, or the continent of africa, should not only be a top player, but should be the most dominate country!
it just doent add up.
2
-
2
-
Will Wright do you think its possible that the US is destroying itself from within, by being too nice and too generous?
allowing itself to be flooded by millions of unknown, undocumented invaders every year (not only the costs associated with govt services, but the possibility of terrorism), and at the same time, allowing foriegn countries and movements to grow, flourish, build up, and gain dominance in their regions as well as possibly world wide? (china, isis, n korea, russia, iran, etc)
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
acousticguitarfan you idiot. you're a liar, and we all know it. you're not a fan of reagan. you're a liberal and only here to bash trump.
i am a reagan republican!
and tho trump is no reagan, he is similar. reagan started out with the liberal/union attitudes, but as he saw the world around him, year after year, he came to see the truth about how things are. sort of like how trump has been liberal in some policies in his earlier, non-political days.
both men saw how america was on the wrong track, and seriously needed a great awakening. both men believed that less govt, less taxes & regulations, allow businesses to grow and people to work and that helps everyone -poor & rich alike!
hillary is exactly the opposite!
anyone with even a hint of being on reagans side, would vote for trump in a second, just to prevent hillary (or any democrat) getting into the white house.
especially since at least one supreme court justice will be the product of this new president. it would be asinine not to vote for trump.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
n52nimbus
Yes, I remember Cronkite and David Brinkley. Didn't a #1 sitcom back in the 70's mention "Commie Cronkite" a few times? Nothing I said is wrong. Are you referring to George H.W. Bush? People who don't know any better often call him "senior" when he isn't a senior, and "W." a junior when he isn't a junior.
So please, explain to me what a "conservative" is, and what a "National Rightist" is.
And just to reiterate my point, the mainstream media always leaned to the left of what the general population did. It was, and still is, sort of a given - people get into the media business to "change the world", "expose the establishment", "break down barriers", "enlighten the world", etc....
Back in the day, they at least tried to hide their leftist/liberal leanings, many even tried to honestly present themselves as completely neutral. Some succeeded better than others. It doesnt change the fact that they were on the left, and their views dictated what and how the news was presented.
It started coming apart during Reagan, then really started coming apart during W. Bush - the media often displayed their true hatred of Bush and Republicans.
Then when Obama came along, they fawned over him like he was their own private mentor, certainly like he was the leader of THEIR party.
With Trump, they now actively campaigned against him and FOR Hillary - it's been proven in black and white!
And to this day, mainstream media actively campaigns against Trump, acting like nothing more than the propaganda wing of the Democrat Party (Fox excluded).
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@ambercarbuncle1440p once again, that is false. Any thinking person can research it and figure it out. But we know democrats will do anything and everything to rewrite history to make themselves look better and absolve them from any responsibility to bkack people. Unfortunately, black people keep falling for it, and keep electing democrats, and keep getting the same problems (never solved), but still blame republicans when they had nothing to do with their city, police department, town counsel, mayor, governor, elections board, or any other position of power, but when something bad or racist happens, somehow it's the republicans fault, and all the corrupt democrats play innocent.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I've been saying a few years now, we're in the second civil war, and we're losing because our side doesn't even realize it.
It used to be, both parties were patriotic, loved our country, had the same beliefs and values, and wanted the same things for our country.
It's not like that now. The Democrats/leftists/socialists/communists dislike our country, its founders, and the traditions, values, and beliefs that built this country into the best, most advanced country in the world. They are like a foriegn entity, trying to conquer and take over this country. They should be treated as such.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I was thinking about that myself. We should all act like this lady. But her case garnered attention, and I will add 'sympathy" , because she's attractive, a woman, and was "only trying to feed her hungry children". What if she had been an ugly single man with no family and just wanted to work to buy fishing equipment or something? He has the same rights she does. But his case would have gotten zero attention, and even if it did get a little publicity, I bet over half the people would not take his side. Like so many things today, it's all about the optics. I do wish more people would stand up like Shelley Luther did, but the public is fickle, and without the public on your side, it's a losing battle. PS. The judge belongs in jail. This isnt the first time he's abused his "powers".
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@stuntmasta305 I think you're missing the point. We are not arguing for or against "Obama care" or healthcare in general, were talking about the legality of the bill, and the way the supreme court addressed it.
When promoting it, Obama could not call it a tax because that would have been political suicide. He assured the populace it was not a tax.
But if it is not a tax, then it is a mandate by the gov't for every citizen to purchase a product.
Obviously, that is unconstitutional, and unlawful. It was taken to the supreme court, and justice Roberts was the deciding vote. He jumped through hoops and even went above and beyond what a justice normally does and reworded some things, to have the law now changed to a tax, to make it "legal" (of which there are still issues, because the law wasn't passed in the way passing taxes requires).
The bottom line is, Roberts made a terrible decision in this case and his explanation of his decision is very poor.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@ljiljavukas1962 Are you trying to ask, "How can illegal immigrants vote"?
If so, that's a good question! The answer should be that they can not, obviously. But they do, and it's no secret. It's the reason why Democrats are against voter ID requirements.
Where I live in Baltimore, Maryland, we have Casa de Maryland (an immigrant protection/promotion organization), and Baltimore is a sanctuary city - even before that term became popular. 20-25 years ago illegal immigrants openly talked about voting in Baltimore. It's been happening around here for decades. So it's obviously happening in other larger sanctuary cities. There have been many instances of an illegal person trying to vote in various places around the country.
By the way, your question is similar to, "How can illegal immigrants work in the US"? According to law, they can not. But we all know they do!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@johnmonk9167 Armed men "storming"????? You're just digging yourself deeper in that hole of ignorance and stupidity. Of the two "protests", which one had officers get shot, and civilians get shot (and die)? The one with the "armed protesters storming the state houses", or the peaceful BLM's?
Now youre changing the goal posts , which is a common tactic of your people. I was rebuking your claim that both protests were equally dangerous and put people's lives at risk.
No matter how you twist it, you cant change the fact that the two protests showed America which kinds of people are in each group. And they are not the same types of people. One group is hard working people with jobs, families, and responsibilities, who want the right to fulfill their responsibilities, and let the govt know, in a respectful, peaceful manner, even cleaning up after themselves, and the other type used a horrible event to go wilding and have a free-for-all, destroying things and people along the way.
You simple can not honestly compare the two. (well you can, but the result will show two radically, fundamentally different groups, not similar in the least).
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@leutrellbodden3743 ok, so we're BOTH hypocritical. At least trump and Republicans are for this country and its values and law and order, where Democrats are for socialism, Marxism, communism, anarchy, racism, looting, and riots. And we all know completely well that if obama, Hillary, biden, or any other democrat was president at this point, he or she would chose a new partisan, activist judge immediately.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@poncedeoly469 Not really. It's true that Tucker is classified as "opinion/commentary" and not an actual news journalist, but that doesnt even amount to a speck of dust in the "if not more so" category.
Do you really want to make a list of all the news networks gaffs, blunders, lies, failed predictions, lawsuits, caught-on-camera events, nepotism, quittings, and firings?
If so, you will find the list for Fox is the shortest of the major mainstream news networks, by far.
2
-
2
-
2
-
I agree. I've twisted my brain into contortions trying to figure out how any reasonable person would be in the Democrat Party. It's like a "reasonable" man joining the k/ kay.k. It doesn't matter how honest or reasonable the individual is, it's what the party/group represents and believes in that matters, and who the other members in the group are. Just look at the wackos and criminals in the Democrat Party - Schumer, Maxine Waters, Frederica, AOC, Ohmar, Pelosi, both Clintons, Hank Johnson, Anthony Weiner, a whole string of Detroit Democrat politicians who went to jail one after the other, corrupt, incompetent Biden, Obama..... I could fill the page with double-digit IQ or totally criminal & corrupt "leaders" of that party, half of which publicly admit to hating our country. NO reasonable person would be a member of that party.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Ulysses.S.Grant.For.The.Union. No, the Democrats have proven time after time they do NOT want the same things as regular Americans. It's clear as day. From kindergarten, to housewives, to high school, college and the workplace, to the court system, to foreign relations, to energy, Democrats have consistently tried to CHANGE what the regular, average Americans have established and are used to - in other words, what we want. From top to bottom, from beginning to end, and everywhere in between, Democrats have tried to infiltrate and control every aspect of power they can, and use it to transform America.
You may have our American values yourself, but open your eyes - the party you belong to does not.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@johndoedoe88 For "EVERY" person? Every time you take money away from a rich person, that person's standard of living goes down. Every time you take money away from the "1%", their standard of living goes down. But you dont care about their standard of living, because they have too much already, right???
So your comment is a blatant lie.
And by the way, if you raise the minimum wage, EVERYTHING ELSE also raises, so those people will still be at the bottom of the barrel, and their standard of living will stay the same, comparatively. (In other words, if they "had to work two jobs to support their family", they STILL would have to work two jobs to support their family! Because everything that THEY have to buy, will now be more expensive. Food, clothes, housing, services, etc...)
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@AlexG-tp2ik Paul Pelosi was given preferential treatment above and beyond what any other person would have gotten, specifically a member of the Trump family or any Republican. What Clinton did was absolutely illegal. There is no question about that. She not only lied under oath, but she knowingly and purposefully destroyed known subpoenaed evidence. Hunter Biden lied on a federal firearms application AND illegally discarded a firearm, both illegal. And for Hunter, that's just the beginning.... like we keep saying, the feds only have a miniscule fraction of evidence of questionable actions on Trump than they do with Hunter and his father, yet they actively HIDE Hunter's evidence, even going so far as to make up lies, first denting it exists, then saying it was fake Russian evidence, then saying they lost it, etc... and look how they treat Trump compared to any Democrat.
Remember when Obama was President and Trump was running, and he complained about the Feds spying on him, and the media and govt called him paranoid and crazy? Yet months later it was all admitted to be the truth?
It's been proven over and over that "they" are willing to lie and skirt the law to go after Trump , while at the same time, lie and skirt the law to cover up for Democrats. They have all lost any credibility.
I cant speak about the 1800's, but no other modern President has been treated so badly and biased against, than Trump.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@STC987 Idiots like Greg don't like to provide actual statistics, or like you stated, admit the real truth. I'm in Baltimore which is 100% Democrat controlled from top to bottom, and is a cesspool of drug and crime issues, again, from the top to the bottom. Same with parts of Prince George's County in Maryland. But because Maryland elected a Republican Governor for the first time in half a century (a very mild, Trump-hating Repiblican, at that), all those horrible crime stats are used in arguments against "Republican states". Leftists are the dumbest, most illogical, and nefarious people in this country.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@michaelmerritt715 The fact that you dont care which party was in charge is the problem right there. More so, the fact that you just admitted you still think Democrats are the better choice.
Its all pretty simple, and just common sense. What course of action would help the most people, and help the entire community as a whole, most effectively - conditioning 90% of its population that the whole country is bad and out to get them and that they can never amount to anything unless a certain party is there to fight "for" them, while encouraging them to keep voting for that party so it will keep giving them money and social services and take care of them their entire lives and all they have to do is simply exist and keep voting?
Or a course of action where the country as a whole is applauded and respected as something special and offers anyone, whatever color, multiple chances to become whatever he/she wants to become while encouraging business growth (ps. most people who come into cities and build businesses ARE the 1%), and taking as little money away from the people who earn it as possible?
The first scenario is what we've had for 50 years give or take, and we've seen the results over and over and over.
It doesnt bode well to indoctrinate multiple generations to hate this "racist" country, while encouraging them to have multiple children through increasing govt benefits while discouraging marriage or even having the father live in the same house and raise the children. This is what the Democrats have done, and continue to do. Its not a talking point, its a stone cold fact. Its happening in Baltimore as I write.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@gabbyb7347 almost a year? Are you sure you don't mean three years? Remember, Obama is the one who initiated that. Somehow few people complained when he did it. And if you're looking to find fault and someone to blame, aim it at the adults who bring the minors illegally into a foreign country, and the Democrats in the US who are encouraging them to break federal national security laws. It's most certainly NOT Trumps fault. He's tried to stop the invasion, Democrats fight him and encourage more invasion. He's tried to get more money for properly caring for the minors, but Democrats denied funding. He called the situation at our border a humanitarian crisis up to a few months ago, and Democrats called it a "fake crisis" and him a liar. Democrats have done everything possible to subvert the rules and law of our country and to make this situation as bad as possible, to chastise Trump. They're playing with people's lives. It's an abomination what the Democrats have done, and continue to do, to this country, all for the sake of making the opposing political party look bad, and trying to garner millions of additional new voters.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Oliver Garcia you're not talking to a kid you fool. I'm old enough, and smart enough, to know you don't tell your enemy what you will and won't do.
You sound like one of those young brainwashed college kids who know nothing about real life, the real world, or history.
Yes, a REAL leader tells enemy nations and rouge regimes that NO options are off the table. Just like a real leader does NOT tell the enemy we are removing all our troops, then gives them the exact date, like Obama did, allowing the enemy to sit back and wait, to come back even stronger..... Exactly what they did!
Or are you so simple and naive that you're afraid that trump might get mad at some nation and start a nuclear war because his feelings got hurt? Are you really that dumb? There are safeguards in place for one thing, but are you really that stupid that you believe he would try that?
And by the way, trump wasn't the one who pointed out the exact man who carried the nuclear codes to the entire world.... That was the democrat Biden.
Maybe Biden is the one who shouldn't be trusted!
1
-
Oliver Garcia If I AM confused, it's from your ignorance!
Regardless of how many people know about the nuclear football, it is NOT a smart idea to ID the man to the entire world. Most normal people know this. That's just one more of Joe Biden's gaffs, that somehow our biased media doesn't take and run with to try to make him the laughingstock of the world, like they do to every republican, including Trump.
Being an individual has nothing to do with what we're talking about. Actually, it's the opposite!
We're talking about being a member of a party. A club. If you claim to be a member, you support the club as a whole. If you dont like who the club voted in as president, either run for yourself next time, or leave the club.
Just like the military. When youre in OUR military, you do what your commander, or higher up, directs you to do. You dont decide for yourself. If you dont like it, you leave the military. because its a club. You are all in the club to achieve the same goal .
The goal of the Republican club at this point is to win the presidency. You cant achieve that by voting for a Democrat.
This is all very, very basic, and shouldn't have to be explained.
1
-
Oliver Garcia
No, actually, its precisely people like you whoi are making it fall apart. Immature SJW's who are so afraid of offending someone, so afraid to actually take a stance on something, that we nominate milk-toast, non-fighters, weak-willed people all up & down our party, including presidential nominee (dole, mccain, romney) then let the media and educational institition belittle and degrade our nominees for the simplist of things (romney's binders, and the prank he played 40 yrs ago in college) and we dont know how to fight back.
we go along to get along. where has that gotten us? we never win the presidency, and even when we win the houses, we're so wimpish, we let obama get everything he wanted anyway!
well, because of those kinds of people, we real republicans are not gonna take it anymore. my first choice was cruz, but i will never never never vote for a democrat, and for the porimarieas, i would never have voted for bush or kasich - theyre the exact reason why we never win the presidency.
and about the nuclear weapon issue, yes, it is totally reasonable that we would want our enemies and potential enemies to THINK we may use nuclear weapons if necessary.
we HAVE to keep them guessing, and on edge.
obviously, you are too young to understand logic. the schools have done a disservice to to our population the way they have brainwashed people for the last 15-20 years. so sad.
1
-
Oliver Garcia that was the comment I asked about way up top. That never happened !!!
It was a fake article that said that! It's been debunked many times. Just like Sarah plain never said, "I can see Russia from my house" .... The democrats and social media all run with something and treat it as fact, just because it makes their side look better.
Hillary leaves her phones with gobs of secret Intel lying around, getting lost, then lies about it (among a million other things) , it's well known that Bill Clinton launched a US invasion to divert attention when his perjury hearings were starting, and you're using a fake comment by trump as a reason not to vote for him?
It's one thing if you're a democrat, and simply prefer socialism ,,, then I can understand someone voting for Hillary. Well, not really, but I have to respect others opinions haha.
But for the life of me, I can't understand how any thinking adult could possibly vote for Hillary over trump.
She lies about EVERYTHING, then she lies about her lies. Her excuse for what she got for for lying about, was that she didn't know or didn't understand.
So she's either a corrupt two faced liar, or she's the most incompetent, inept, oblivious person who has no business in any high govt office.
Either way, she's not presidential material.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
acousticguitarfan right... so youre one of the idiot RINO's like McConnell and Boehner who have done nothing to mobilize our base, let alone reach out and try to get new voters to join the party, and have simply stood by while the Dems have done anything they wanted.
dole, mccain, & romney did real well, didn't they??? and you prefer another from the same exact template.... to get the same results? is that what you prefer?
you people are the EXACT reason why someone like trump has won the vote!
you deserve nothing better haha, you can blame no one but yourselves!
too bad for you.
i'll take an idiot bigot before i take another idiot wallflower who cant even beat the democrat in the general, and if by chance does, bends over backwards to get along and gives the dems everything while getting nothing in return!
and by the way, give it a rest with the bigot talk. anyone with a little iq knows thats just liberal talk for ANY republican they go against. you know completely well that if jeb had won, they'd be calling him a bigot and racist, too! i guarantee it!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Jackie Onate jackie, you sound like a decent person, but the fact is, illegal immigration is wrong. its also a bad thing for our country. no country in the world has open borders and simply allows MILLIONS of people every year to invade their country. especially when that country is a welfare state!
when the invaders speak a different language.
it just doesnt work.
yes, there needs to be changes made to the LEGAL immigration process (thats another story- another example of 'big govt' ineptness & inefficiency)
but turning a blind eye to millions of invaders who have no documentation, no vetting, openly breaking the law, is no way to sustain a successful country.
mexico is basically a third-world country. US is the worlds superpower. (or at least, was)
you cant allow millions & millions of third world citizens to flood into a country, and that country continue to stay at the level it started.
im sorry, but thats just the way it is.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Simon Lorenz I dont know how to explain this - i'm not a philosopher, just an regular working guy.
I suppose you mean well, but people like you are the problem. You fail to see, or accept, the reality of the current situation in the US.
Maybe way back in the day, a "liberal" was someone who wanted the right of women to vote. Then 'liberal' meant free love and unregulated drug use. Nowadays, 'liberals' are these kids in the liberal arts colleges who take courses in gender studies, afro-centric history, and generally, anything that demeans the white male. The courses are taught by ex-hippy liberals, and the schools are run by liberals. They have raised at least one generation of liberal, perpetually-democrat-voting, whiners who believe this country was founded illegally by white racists and that white racism has been the theme of this country the whole time. They have been TAUGHT to look for and expect racism every day, all around them.
That is why I said that 'liberalism' is the problem. Instead of teaching how good this country is, how we tried to right our wrongs, how we still offer the greatest opportunities to EVERYOINE to advance, regardless of their race or whatever, how we are more accepting of a greater diversity of people than probably anywhere else in the entire world.... they teach and yell from the rooftops how BAD this country was and still is. How almost all problems stem from the white male ruling class.
This is no way to form a greater nation. This way of teaching / training will not benefit us as a whole, it has only separated us and made groups resent each other. It has hindered many people , and even ruined careers, needlessly.
Conservatives and Republicans dont have these attitudes - we dont 'look' for racism everywhere. We dont automatically assume racism when odd coincidences happen.
Conservatives dont look at that ad and say, "a Jewish star! And MONEY! Must be anti-semitic racism! Trump is a racist!"
But that's exactly what today's liberals do!
And by the way, just supposing the start WAS intended to be a veiled reference to Judaism - why do you assume it's ANTI semitic? Maybe it could be a shout-out to Jews, welcoming them?
To sum up my point, think about how many times you hear people on the RIGHT calling others racist, or finding racist meanings in things, or experiencing racist micro-aggression. You will find that this is not a trait of the right, it is CLEARLY a trait of the left, therefore a leftist trait.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Simon Lorenz But that is sort of what I was getting at in the first place. If it wasn't headlined in the news, I would have never even THOUGHT about a Jew when seeing this. I just saw it as a starburst just like I see variations of on many advertisements.
And that is why I brought the left-right argument into the equation. A certain half of this country doesn't have race on it's mind 24/7, so they dont make the connection when vague racial incidences arise. (ironically, this is the same half that's always accused of racism)
The OTHER half of the country sees race in everything, And when it can be used against the first half, they will milk it for all they can.
Maybe Trump retweeted it 'before thinking' because being the non-racist he is, he didnt see anything racist in it. He could have looked at it 100 times and not seen anything racist to him. To him, all he saw was money -representing the bribery and corruption and flow of money around the Clinton's, and a starburst highlighting the text. He probably never even 'saw' the star. Most people wouldn't either.
I do agree that he has a bad habit of tweeting & retweeting off the cuff, though, I will give you that for sure! I just dont see the racism.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
jackchorn
It's all a matter of the beholders perspective. Many people say the left have moved so far left, they're basically socialists.
And the reason people like trump, Cruz, and the tea party became popular is because they go against the regular current day republicans, who may as well be democrats.
Remember, it was John Kennedy who said, " ask NOT what your country can do for you, but what YOU can do for your country".
Can you possibly imagine a democrat saying this nowadays?
All the democrats do nowadays is badmouth this country and divide all the voters into little voting blocks (blacks, women, gay, anti-religious, min wage workers, etc) and campaign on what they (the govt) will give them. He also lowered taxes. Something democrats are scared and embarrassed to do nowadays.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
*****
i dont need to do any fact checking. firstly, reagan was not in the 70's! maybe YOU need to do some fact checking! "white" people had jobs???? what kind of racist statement is that? white people were a huge majority of our nation in 1980, so if "white people" had jobs, that means the majority of the nation has jobs and was working! thats a good thing!
nowadays, "white people" DONT have jobs, or are working much lesser jobs than their college degrees would warrant.
i do agree what you say about mexicans flooding the country. even back then, we sort of knew it was a problem. hats why reagan passed the amnesty bill. he was trying to be reasonable. unfortunately, even he didnt realize that was just a "green light" for millions upon millions more to flood our country.
bernie sanders is a complete failure. for your information, we dont WANT democracy. democracy is mob rule. thats like two wolves and a sheep voting on whats for dinner.
this country is a representative republic. all the things bernie wants may sound good on paper, but simply would never work in this country. i dont have room to explain all the limits and failures of socialism, but bernie is definitely NOT a good thing for the 'working class'. if he had his way, it wouldnt be long before he has every business move away or shut down due to over regulation and exorbitant labor, taxes, and other costs. then the whole working class would be on welfare :-(
trump being a capitalist is a good thing. bringing business back into this country, and making it easier for small businesses to grow, and for new businesses to start, are exactly what our country needs, to become successful again. it does NOT need to become some european socialist wasteland.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bonsa1guy Obviously you are just a troll. It would take the whole page to properly explain it with examples and proof. Trade deals, tariffs, wars, banking and other monetary rules and laws, employment and wage regulations, govt stimulus and all govt spending in general, etc...., ALL affect inflation rates, and as the saying goes, "as goes the US, so goes the rest of the globe."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@johnmonk9167 Are you really that ignorant that you cant admit the difference between the people who peacefully (literally) protested the govt telling citizens we couldnt go out mow our lawn, walk our dog, hike in the woods, etc..... and these violent BLM riots that have left cities looking like war zones and have literally, right before peoples eyes, murdered people??
Are you people on the left REALLY that brainwashed? You honestly think you have an argument to compare the two?
Please step back and really think about the facts in the situations, and think twice about the differences between the left and right.
Unless you're simply trolling for the laughs, it's really hard to believe you could actually believe your own argument. Of course, the left constantly does these things, so it's hard to know who is trolling, and who is simply oblivious.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1