Comments by "Luredreier" (@Luredreier) on "US M2 Bradley infantry fighting vehicle or Swedish CV90? Which is better suited for modern wars?" video.

  1. The CV 90 allow you to flank enemies by using terrain that their tanks and IFVs can't traverse to surprise them. Terrain that the Bradley can't traverse.
    3
  2. 1:46 I'm pretty sure that it's not "fordon"
    1
  3. ​​ @petergrandien1440 unny. But I do hope that engines capable of burning hydrogen might show up in vehicles like this with time. Gasoline and diesel is probably going to be the main fuel still due to the need for longer range etc, but you can produce hydrogen in the field even if you're surrounded or the enemy have fire control over your supply line. You just need electricity of some kind. The increased environmentalism is just a bonus. Also, multi fuel engines are just practical with regards to using resources you come by.
    1
  4.  @alexanderbarkman7832  Rubber tracks reduce noise, increase comfort for the crew and reduce weight. And does less damage to roads etc. On the other hand it has less durability from what I understand... In other words, you can move them to the frontline on tarmack roads without ruining them, the crew won't be as exhausted when they arrive making them more combat effective, the lower weight may allow you to traverse more terrain and you have a okey chance at sneaking up on the enemy due to less noise. But you'll end up having to use more logistics capacity on replacing the tracks...
    1