Comments by "Luredreier" (@Luredreier) on "What if Scandinavia United? How Powerful Would It Be?" video.

  1. + @rasmusfabernrgaard6461  They're a part of the Danish *kingdom*. Part of "Denmark" the country... Eh, that's highly debatable...
    10
  2. The problem would be the fundamental difference in interests. Denmark and Norway are more costal then Sweden is with all that entail. Sweden and Denmark are more continental then Norway is, with all that entail. There's a reason why Sweden and Denmark joined the EU and Norway and Iceland didn't. For Norway, Iceland and the Faero islands fishery and good relations with the current naval powers of the world takes priority over good relations with the continent. For Sweden and Denmark good relationship with the continent matters more then to us due to your geographical location. Norway is also a mountainous country and mountain people tend to be more independence minded in general, as you can see with the Switz, Norwegians and many other people of the world both currently and historically. We've also been the lesser part in a union a bit too often with all that entails and as a result we're even more consious about the drawbacks of not being in power of our own destiny. Something that is also reflected in how our country is structured. Not just around our capital but very much decentralized while Sweden has allowed its own rural communities die we've activly faught against centralization and for the power and prosperity of the rural areas. In part because of that land area counts about as much as population numbers when distributing parliamentary seats among the electoral circles. Your electoral systems also differ a bit from ours. In Norway there is no lower limit in terms of voters required to enter the parliament. If you have enough votes in a electoral circle to earn one of the 150 seats that directly represents the electoral circles then you'll get a seat no matter how few votes was required to achieve that. This makes it easier to create and run small political parties that can stay relevant politically. That said, like you we do have leveling seats. And you're required to have 4% of the votes nationally to be eligible to those leveling seats. There's also a difference in what number we use to modify the Sainte-Laguë method. Interestingly from what I've heard you've dropped yours down this year.
    6
  3. + @vincentkvl  It's the "part of Denmark" bit that is debatable... The same applies to a lesser degree to Åland. The Faero Islands and Greenland have some degree of independent relations with other countries. They have different cultures and languages. And through most of their history they where not a part of the Danish kingdom at all, but either independent or a part of the Norwegian kingdom. They have never truly been integrated into Denmark even though there's been multiple Danish attempts at doing so. And the futile Danish attempts at integration has largely been in the process of reversing ever since the second world war left the Faero Islands, Iceland and Greenland in the hands of the allies while Denmark proper where occupied by Germany. There are different laws that applies to them then Denmark proper even if there's not many of them. Some of those laws even predates Danish rule (in the case of the Faero islands there's one for ownership of land of the coast where any land that you can ride on with a horse even if it is underwater belongs to the owner of the land above water as well if I don't remember wrong) They are different nations and arguably different countries within the Danish Kingdom as well.
    2
  4. 3:46 You switched up the Norwegian and Danish flags... Regarding a united scandinavia... I doubt that would be a good idea. I think it would be a good idea to do something in between like the current EU for us. But in the end we do have different interests. Norways main priorities tends towards fishing, oil and the worlds sea powers (mainly UK and US). Denmark is more continental looking towards Germany while also being a costal nation. Sweden is even more focused towards the continent then Denmark is in part because historically they've been cut off from the sea by Denmark-Norway. And because they have a fairly cosmopolitan culture of course.
    1