Comments by "Luredreier" (@Luredreier) on "Forbes Breaking News" channel.

  1. Try proportional representation... First past the post is leading to this kind of corruption...
    9
  2.  @bigdogbill119  Instead of calling it "hogwash" I suggest that you actually look it up. Because the numbers are in, most plants in most of the world contain less nutrients then before. Domesticated and wild plants alike. A important factor that this effect is often attributed to is increased CO2 levels (as experiments in controlled conditions have shown that plants contain less nutrients when grown in a high CO2 environment with other factors being as close as possible to the same). But the whole world and its plants isn't a controlled experiment, so while we definitely know that CO2 can cause the effect I'm not sure if it has been proven that it's the main cause or only cause for that matter quite yet... But it's definitely the top suspect from what I can tell...
    8
  3. ​ @ethanwilliams4559 More growth yes, but actually less nutrients. Turn out that plants are becoming less and less nutritious.
    5
  4.  @manmanman2000  H2O is also a important greenhouse gas, but the problem is more the combined effects of that and other gasses overcoming the mechanisms countering them.
    5
  5.  @poet7158  Wrong, Washington DC is not a part of Maryland and does not currently have the right to representation to the congress.
    4
  6.  @freethinker8274  Exactly. Any American citizen living here in Norway gets voting rights in local and regional elections if they live here for a while. Citizenship is not required.
    3
  7.  @poet7158  Washington the district of Colombia is outside Maryland. There used to be two parts of the district, one from each state, one part was returned to one of the states, I don't remember from the top of my head what part. What's left in DC in is not in any state but is a separate area that's been requesting voting rights for a while because they're not represented in Maryland. There's areas outside the DC where people commute into the DC, that's in Maryland. But DC itself is not a part of Maryland. Look up the Maryland state borders near the DC.
    3
  8.  @Puzzlesocks  True, there's no one factor responsible alone. But this isn't just seen in domesticated plants, but also in wild ones. So yeah, CO2 is a important contributor in this regard even if it's definitely not alone.
    3
  9.  @timothyblazer1749  You claim that plants grown with regenerative processes generate more nutrients then the monoculture plants, and I believe that. But do they produce as much as using the same techniques in the past? It matters what you are comparing with. Also, how do you explain the lower level of nutrients in wild plants? Or what about tests where the plants have the same conditions, same genes, same access to nutrients, same amount of light, but the plants with more CO2 has has nutrient density inside the plant? Regenerative farming practices are important, but they don't solve every problem. And plants just like all other lifeforms including us are fundamentally just chemical processes and changing the concentration of different chemicals in a process can change the outcome, not always for the better. Because plants are more then just one chemical reaction. There's more going on in a plant then just photosynthesis, and while photosynthesis might benefit from more CO2 those other processes are apparently a different matter given the observations.
    3
  10. You can here in Norway. Just get a residence here and live here for a few years and you'll get voting rights in local and regional elections. National ones requires a citizenship though.
    2
  11.  @StopListenThink  Plenty of you guys have voting rights in my country without a citizenship. Shrugs Shouldn't people have a right to influence the conditions that they are living in? A right to influence their own lives?
    2
  12.  @melissadavis7234  Actually, Washington DC foes not have a vote for the US legeslative body at all. They can send a representative, but said representative does not have a voting right, just speaking right. Therefore citizens of Washington DC actually are not represented by Congress. The democrat solution to that is statehood. My compromise suggestion is allow them to share representative with Maryland and vote for the same representative, see if that's something that the democrats are open to.
    2
  13.  @poet7158  Maryland ceded the land where Washington DC currently occupies to the federal government and it's no longer part of any state and hasn't been since 1790.
    2
  14.  @freethinker8274  Yeah, I've heard of people from here in Scandinavia going to the US and people think they're from places in the US that has taken various European names. Including the name of our countries. It's kind of funny in a way.
    2
  15.  @poet7158  It was donated and ceded. It stopped being a part of Maryland the state entirely from that point onwards. The other half also wasn't a part of Virginia either till it was returned to Virginia. The part that was formerly a part of Maryland remained separate from Maryland though through to this day and is not part of that state legally, politically or in any other way. The state border of Maryland literally has a square shaped hole where Washington DC is, because it's not a part of Maryland.
    2
  16. Why? This is essentially what we do in my country... Shrugs
    2
  17. Actually, no. Plants need CO2, yes, but lately the increase in CO2 has actually caused them to grow faster but also reduce their nutritional value worldwide. And CO2 was already changing our climate prior to humans existing, it's basically the majority of the difference between our climate and that of Mars. And that's done by such a small percentage, less then even. So just imagine how bad it would be if it reached a full percent?
    2
  18. ​​ @cynthiacook1646 0% CO2? Even during the Cambrian explosion the air only had about 4 000 parts pr million of CO2. It's now about 418 ppm, more then a doubling from the norm of the last 5 million years of between 180 and 280 ppm. Given that 400 is about 1/10th of 4 000 and 400 is what he described as 0,4% then presumably the levels of the Cambrian explosion, the highest level since multi-cellular life evolved must therefore be in the ballpark of 5% at the most if my quick and dirty head approximation is worth anything... Not 20% Now before multicellular life and before any organisms where using photosynthesis to make oxygen that's of course a different story. But the levels of that particular time definitely isn't relevant to us. Especially given that the sun only produced about 70% of the energy levels it does now back then... In other words, 20% CO2 wouldn't just be lethal to humans (we start entering coma at about 10% give or take although we can technically survive a bit more) but would have a far worse impact on our climate then it did on the climate back then. As for our plants... You really think that our plants that for the most part evolved relatively recently are prepared to survive Cambrian conditions? Seriously, are you aware that about 40% of all plant species in the world today are endangered or on the verge of extinction? CO2 is important for plants just like oxygen is for us. But both are lethal to both us and them in excess.
    2
  19. Why? Shouldn't people have a right to self determination? A right to influence their own lives? This is people living in your country, being taxed by your country. Wheren't taxation without representation kind of important to you guys back in the days?
    2
  20.  @tanderson6442  Yes, you are. Non-citizens can vote here in Norway in local and regional elections. Indeed I'm making use of that very law myself as a non-citizen (Born and raised here, just never had a need to apply for citizenship). Granted, I'm from a fellow nordic nation, but the law applies just fine to you Americans too. You need to be a registered resident with a residence permit and live here for 3 years. Quite a few people actually end up voting in my home city after being a exchange student here since we until recently had free (token fee of like 30 dollars pr year) university education for non-citizens, including Americans. (Books, excursion expenses, materials, living expenses etc was not included or covered and you had to prove the ability to finance that in some way, like a grant, scholarship etc before getting resident permit here).
    2
  21.  @hpotter2954  Why not?
    1
  22. @@win4lifee I'm understanding what you're saying, I just deeply dissagree with the notion that people should be unable to vote in local elections without citizenship. Unable to vote for school boards, mayors, city council members, etc, people that have a profound impact on their day to day life. That's the kind of thing that makes your country even less desirable to move to then it already is. And let me remind you, your fertility rate has dropped below a sustainable level in the US. There's now quite a bit less then 2 kids born pr US woman. Meaning that you are going to have demographic and economic problems comming up, jus like we are here in Europe. And you're losing out on talented people that's needed to keep your economy competitive.
    1
  23.  @russellupsumgrub9633  How so? You could literally come to Norway, get a job here, pay taxes and vote within 3 years without applying for a citizenship in Norway. That's been true for many, many years and we're better off for it.
    1
  24. So, this goverment body where you can't be voted in from the D. C. is to deny D. C. The right to decide who has voting rights *there*? Also, we're not talking about outlaws here, we're talking about people living in the D. C. In my own country Americans have voting rights in local and regional elections when living here for a while without ever getting a citizenship. So it's not like this doesn't exist elsewhere. Shouldn't a non-citizens have the right to vote on who may lead the schools that their kids is going to? Shouldn't they have a right to a say in what their taxes are being used for? How the local city plans are being drafted? Plans that they have to live with long term?
    1
  25.  @mortekaieve4729  I'm a non-citizen of Norway (never seen the need to register). I vote in local and regional elections. Same as what Washington DC is doing. You have to be a green card holder registered as living there to vote there. So a registered resident, just like us. Why is that so outrageous to you?
    1
  26. You all scorn them, but how often haven't you been unaware of a detail that you haven't prepared for and didn't expect before? Given that 0,4% of the atmosphere is capable of keeping our climate that much hotter then Mars (because without any climate gases we'd be a frozen ball of rock) then imagine how bad more CO2 would be...
    1
  27.  @tanderson6442  And you really think that the democrats are suggesting that just anyone can vote? We're talking tax paying residents here. They've been in your system for years...
    1
  28.  @tanderson6442  Yes, and from what I've gathered that's the exact same as what Washington DC is doing here...
    1
  29.  @mortekaieve4729  Sorry, what immigration crises? Where did you hear that we had a immigration crises? Because that's definitely news to me... Perhaps use need sources that fact check their claims next time?
    1
  30.  @mortekaieve4729  Ps. Norway is a separate country from Sweden or Denmark. I wish I didn't have to precise that fact, but previous experience with your fellow countrymen have shown me that I can't make the assumption that you're aware of such facts...
    1
  31.  @freethinker8274  Yes, I do believe that they're aware that residents of Washington DC are paying taxes, you don't need to list them. ;-)
    1
  32.  @tanderson6442  A number of things. US citizenship comes with some pretty big downsides. In the case of some countries it involves losing your own citizenship due to not allowing double citizenship, that could be a problem if you have a better passport in your home country or if you indeed may lose the right to permanent residency in your own country by losing said citizenship. You may lose privileges from your old country like social security, healthcare etc rights when at home visiting family that you have as a citizen in some countries. American citizens also have to pay taxes abroad on top of the local taxes, meaning that if they ever come back they'll have a significant financial burden there... And there might be other restrictions that I'm not aware of for some countries. Since this is Washington DC a lot of these people may work for the embassies, so they may lose their job as a non-citizen of their respective countries. There's a number of reasons why people do not desire to become a citizen. I was born and raised here in Norway, I've yet to apply for citizenship, because until recently that would have required me to give up my Icelandic citizenship. A citizenship that would be difficult for me to regain later since I've never lived in Iceland. Not had my mother applied for a Norwegian citizenship, despite living here for close to 50 years. Your assumption that people who have lived in the US for 30+ years will apply for citizenship is wrong. People who are legal residents, who are paying taxes will live their whole lives in the US without a citizenship. My sister has moved to the US with her husband who is Asian. While Norway is more convenient for her it's not for her family. So they moved to the US after living in Germany for a while. Now they're talking about moving back to Europe, but that's difficult due to their sons having grown up in the US. Keeping their current citizenships keeps their options open. Getting a US citizenship would burn bridges for them and their family. And we're talking highly educated people, he's a economy professor doing lectures internationally. And she's highly educated as well, doing work that it's rare for Americans to know how to do. They are currently unable to vote for school boards of the school their kids attended as non-citizens. Unable to vote for who is to decide how much local taxes they pay, how the city is planned etc. Her oldest son was born when they moved to the US, her youngest son was born in the US. Their sons where both top 10 in their university classes from what I understand. Both have grown up, gotten jobs and works in international jobs. One of them has a European girlfriend, the other a African one. That family will leave the US if they don't end up feeling welcome. So will many others. The US is not the best place in the world to live, even if it's definitely not a bad one. My sisters husband has also helped a friend of his start up a company in the US creating US jobs and they're partners in that company. After Trump came into office they've been considering leaving the country as they're no longer feeling welcome.
    1
  33.  @StopListenThink  May I ask what you're talking about?
    1
  34.  @tanderson6442  A, I'm not in the US. B, Washington DCs law has nothing to do with people without a visa, it requires a green card. But apparently despite being granted legal residency, something that given the strict immigration laws of the US means that your government really thinks that you're likely to be a positive impact on the country you're still going to be discriminated against. Makes you guys a lot less competitive, that's for sure...
    1
  35. What people? Those republicans?
    1
  36.  @mortekaieve4729  And that's a problem with your first past the post electoral system. But in this case they want to have a say in who may vote in their own local elections. Yet this is suddenly being discussed in a legeslative body where they don't have a say as being something this body should block?
    1
  37.  @matthewcurry3565  "cabal" Americans...
    1
  38.  @matthewcurry3565  Honestly mixing up places with similar names isn't being dumb, don't worry. :-) But if you're aware of such issues it's a good idea to ask people to specify between the options you're aware of, and since knowing what you don't know is wisdom perhaps add or are you from somewhere I didn't think of in the end.
    1
  39.  @poet7158  Given how the US is using a first past the post electoral system the position that giving Washington DC state rights would lead to a imbalance since the first past the post system gives anyone with a plurality of the votes 100% of the power despite not holding a majority and indeed being opposed by a majority of voters. Meaning that since DC is blue republican voters there still would have no representation, just like Democrat voters in Texas currently are unrepresented in the congress. The system splits you guys into two political parties that basically never agree on anything. Under that system it makes sense to oppose giving Washington DC that representation since they would both have fewer people then most states, and would side more with your opponent. The idea that they shouldn't be represented at all doesn't make sense. But it could make sense for them to be merged with Maryland for the purpose of federal level elections, since most of Washington DCs Metropolitan area is a part of Maryland anyway. If I was a republican that would be my counter proposal. Because people of Washington not having a say in the US Congress obviously is unreasonable. But the way the Democrats wants to give them a say is problematic for you. For local elections they can remain independent. Maryland should still have a bigger population so sharing that representative shouldn't hurt them too much. If that's indeed impossible then the democrat position is indeed the only remaining viable one. But honestly you guys really should reform your election system. It's not tenable long term. Republicans are going to lose the ability to win elections long term since they alienate conservatives of other ethnicities with their policies. And there's more then one way of being right leaning. In a proportional system the American right could win elections even if the republican party itself doesn't become the biggest party, through the use of coalitions like we use in Europe. Both the republican party and the Democratic party would likely split up into multiple political parties that more closely align with what people genuinely believe in.
    1
  40.  @freethinker8274  Giving Washington DC to Maryland probably isn't a good idea, but I think sharing a representative could be, and it's a compromise position giving Washington DC representation.
    1
  41.  @freethinker8274  What's the time stamp for that comment if I may ask?
    1
  42.  @matthewcurry3565  Nah, you're more like that slightly weird uncle that once saved dad's life from a fire or driving out in a snow storm or something, but who's also a bit of a alcoholic with PSTD from the war and political views that's anything but politically correct. You're a bit embarrassed by him in family parties, but still, he is a hero in his fucked up ways, and you can count on him to risk his life to save your ass. Even if you keep rolling your eyes at him throughout the family dinner...
    1
  43.  @tedcollins4684  Clearly it doesn't given that so many places in the US already practice giving people local voting rights and have done so without violation of said constitution... Also, that condition is seriously outdated and it was designed at a time when you guys still practiced overt slavery instead of calling it prison labour... I honestly think that the system in my country would probably be a better fit for the US. We have proportionality and added political weight and representation to low population areas at the same time. The details obviously wouldn't work for you without modification, but the basic ideas definitely would solve a lot of your problems.
    1
  44.  @matthewcurry3565  Yes, intelligence is about processing data, knowledge is about knowing information, and wisdom is to applying the two well and generally comes from experience. You can be intelligent and knowledgeable and still not be wise, as well as intelligent and wise without being knowledgeable and wise and knowledgeable without being intelligent.
    1
  45.  @freethinker8274  If you type in the time with colon, like 8:00 you'll generate a link to that time stamp. And yeah, some kind of representation definitely is needed. But so is meeting the republicans halfway somehow.
    1
  46.  @matthewcurry3565  Hehe, fair enough. I don't use any of those three personally. No alcohol, no tobacco, no weed, no coffee (I had what's probably my third cup of coffee in my life last year, just never been a fan of coffee), I drink tea a bit more often, but that's also just a handful of times pr year. Vegetarian too by the way. Yes, I'm a bit picky about what I put inside my body...
    1
  47.  @matthewcurry3565  It still showed up in my email notifications. We could keep talking elsewhere if you wish. I'm definitely politically active myself. I used to be left leaning in my country. But switched to a more centrist political party for various reasons due to priorities about what's important and because I wanted a party willing to cooperate with the right to represent me and my values rather then one married to a labour party that at times walks over other political parties instead of cooperating. I dissagree with our conservatives on many things, but unlike yours ours are actually damned good at negotiating good compromises that everyone can live with so despite being left leaning I actually want a coalition government lead by them, as long as they're in a coalition with my preferred party instead of the far right... Having our proportional system also encourages you to see things from your opponents point of view. As they're just as much potential allies as enemies. Indeed our far left and far right occasionally push through legislation together despite dissagreeing on almost everything else.
    1
  48.  @tedcollins4684  Move to Norway. Get a resident permit and work permit. After being a tax paying resident for 3 years in the same location in Norway, you're free to vote here. I believe something similar is true in the other nordic nations, possibly elsewhere in Europe. Given that you guys have cities crossing international borders (both with Canada and Mexico) it's a bit weird that you guys don't do that more.
    1
  49.  @freethinker8274  Um, perhaps use a different nickname on YouTube? Just saw what nick you have in the mailbox... It's not showing in the app itself... I have a feeling that it's not exactly popular...
    1
  50.  @freethinker8274  Others misbehaving isn't justification for us to do so.
    1