Comments by "Luredreier" (@Luredreier) on "Brodie Robertson"
channel.
-
7:01
No, most rational people wouldn't ban them, sorry.
Rational people tends to have a longer fuse then you.
And instead they'll look at the intention.
If it's a legitimate issue they'll accept it even if it's committed in this... "Language"...
That's why you see so many serious responses.
7:49
The Linux kernel can afford to ban people behaving this way because it's a huge project with a massive number of commits, not because it's "serious".
People in smaller projects need every response they can get and can't afford to be too picky about the language.
And while it may be s bit annoying for some, most would just find this a bit funny and appreciate the joke that is the language used while also appreciate the seriously positive intent.
Anyone who'd ban this person for writing this would be far less "rational" then they are.
And in my view even in a serious project like the Linux kernel the response that should be used is a thanks for the help, but also a warning not to not use that language again as it's not appropriate for a project with that many eyes on it, it including many who are not native speakers and who may have issues with the language used.
And a message saying that it therefore will unfortunately lead to him being banned from the project if repeated.
Essentially, banning anyone for this as a first offense is just downright wrong in my view as their heart is in the right place.
8:57
Okay, that is weird...
11:18
The actual code should be clean, at least of anything that would break the code if copy/past directly I to the source code.
UwU in the code comments etc shouldn't be a major issue in my view.
11:58
Exactly.
People care about substance, not form.
12:22
That single trolly one is the only one where I'd even consider banning him...
3
-
3
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1