Youtube comments of Al Loomis (@alloomis1635).
-
1100
-
94
-
83
-
75
-
69
-
61
-
57
-
53
-
48
-
46
-
41
-
41
-
40
-
37
-
35
-
35
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
it turns out, when you build a nation on slavery and ethnic cleansing, the national character of rulers and ruled is equally debased.
trump is more than a monster, for he perfectly exemplifies the brutality and greed that has expanded 13 colonies huddled on the atlantic shore into a world-girdling empire of mega-corporations offering every service from banking to uniformed murder. it seems only fitting, that trump is a caricature figure, .semi-literate, compulsive tweeter, draft-dodger and abject sycophant of real dictators, he even has the trophy wife desired by defective 14 year olds.
and he is america's president, the choice of the electorate once, and with an opposition of similar character, likely to stay in power.
and all the while, we hear endlessly, that the usa, and the american people are the defenders of democracy.
no, you are not.
24
-
23
-
read 'decline and fall of the roman empire' as a young lad. interesting for the battles, but in retrospect, the value of the denarius is equally important, and as the silver was slowly replaced by copper, so the empire declined. not co-incidence, it turns out.
the evil empire can sink beneath the sea, and much of the east coast will do that, the west coast will be devastated by fire, flood and tectonic plate wiggles, and some or all of the usa will likely be visited by the supervolcano under yellowstone.
so will the evil empire be erased by god, or merely shredded by greed, arrogance and institutional idiocy?
isn't it exciting?
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
i wish humanity were capable of truth, justice and democracy, but i see no sign of it. our extended-family heritage of roaming african plains is written in our genes, and in a society musing on nuclear structure, quantum computing and cosmological physics, the result is simultaneously terrifying and depressing. an individual person is given the management of a giant nation, a selection process that only weeds out foreign born, and under 35. are you all demented? no one should have such power- you are not an agricultural society of coach-borne gentlemen in powdered wigs anymore.
and yet, while trump's character is widely decried, no one says a word about the system that brought him to power. are you all idiots?
and he is supported by a senate made obsolete by militarism, whose only visible purpose is to make usa more corrupt with each passing day. are you all brain-dead?
i don't propose violent revolution, it should not be necessary. if every sane citizen simply emailed your representatives each week for 6 months, saying simply: "give us democracy" that would be enough. if you don't have effective and accessible power of citizen initiative within 6 months, it will be necessary to re-consider non-violence, but i bet 100 million emails would do the trick.
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
perhaps if we call the system what it really is, we might begin to improve it.
for starters, the political system is not capitalism, it's elective oligarchy.
''capitalism' refers to the economic system, it is just a euphemism for impersonal greed., mixed with intrinsic corruption.
notice that the political system is not 'democracy.' the people do not rule, they have no handle on public affairs, much of which is conducted in secret. once you admit that the system is not democracy, public discussion can move on to useful questions, such as:
what is actual democracy?
is it desirable?
is it attainable?
but first you have to stop saying, 'we have it, but it never seems to work.' that is insanity, at best.
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
have a little pity. young trumpy was driven to perform over his intellectual ability and the result is the lying and boasting, and occasional veiled threats, plus the flying hair and bloated body. a wreck of a human, surrounded by people smarter than him, although he makes efforts to create a supportive team of people dimmer still. that's hard when you suspect people are laughing at you. anyway, he has done well, not at business, but at exploiting the antique and decadent political system. unlike business and finance, politics can be done without reference to reality, in the usa, it is the world of lies.
15
-
15
-
i got over maher quickly, it's not hard. but it's nice to see him being publicly skewered, ty, mr dore.
afghanistan is a mess, and the usa is responsible.
taliban is unlovely, but they have been resisting foreign rule, against the power of the usa and the 'northern alliance' bandits that are subsidized by the usa. who have raised their heads again, by no coincidence.
it's not easy, mixing it with the evil empire, and the might-as-well, let's- get- along fellow travelers of the evil empire must inspire rage in those who resist, to the death.
it's afghanistan, not switzerland. the worst aspects are largely created by the orcs who run usa foreign policy. don't throw stones unless your hands are clean, and that would be no one, in the usa.
15
-
the great lie of usa is that it is a democracy. once you accept that lie, rational analysis is impossible.
orwell hated ussr for personal reasons, doubtless well founded. but when it comes to perverting language to control minds, usa is world champion.
newspeak r us[a].
and that's the facilitating purpose of 'rugged individualism' - democracy would lead to socialism, [ madison said so,] so you must worship individual responsibility and allow the politicians to administer the nation as they think best.
usa was created to preserve slavery, and the rule of wealth. those are the facts, admitted to in documents by the men who attended the constitutional convention. it is not a democracy, madison explained why it was not and how it was prevented.
any american who uses 'our democracy' is corrupting the language, usually to suppress the poor, occasionally to wonder why things aren't going well for the nation.
things aren't going well because you persist in living a fantasy.
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
i'm afraid you don't deserve hatred. pity for indian people, contempt for indian rulers - that seems more likely.
the two nations were very roughly in a similar position 100 years ago, china has transformed itself into the highest level of technical civilization, india lags behind. it should be a matter of shame, but indian rulers choose aggression, instead.
china stumbled into the idea of a public service almost 2000 years ago, and it has a new manifestation in the communist party, modern mandarins. so they are capable of concerted effort with central direction. currently they are the most effective society in the world. their history is unique, and their chief competitor, usa, is rotten, in the grip of greed and arrogance.
india cannot emulate china, modi boasts india will surpass china, with no visible evidence.
india must find its own path to modern life, but its problems are many and progress will continue to be slow, and not helped by empty boasting.
14
-
if you read the constitution, you will discover the word 'democracy' does not appear. neither is there any reference to 'referendum,' or 'citizen initiative.'in fact, the constitution establishes elective oligarchy. documents relating the activity of the constitutional convention reveal that democracy was briefly discussed and refused, as it would lead to unwashed masses ruling over landed gentlemen. consequently, there is no reason to impute democracy to the structure or activities of the usa government. people who talk about 'american democracy' are delusional.
why then do people do it?
the best way to keep people from demanding democracy is to tell them that what they have is democracy, an improved version done for them by loving politicians, no effort required.
such a lie, repeated often from childhood, creates a nation of ignorant, passive, and hopeless couch potatoes, as here we see.
14
-
14
-
it's really simple: the professional politicians have sold out the [ ex ] working class. they are angry, and desperate, and those additional 30 million suddenly without health insurance in the midst of a callous handling of the virus are easily recruited to violence- see 'stop shut-down' marches with armed men.
there is no cure for usa problems, they are baked in to the law and culture. only revolution, impossible, or military coup, very possible, can re-direct the nation.
the virus, the climate, the economy, the politics stress, usa is what a collapsing society looks like.
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
they have something called "re-call" in the california constitution. if usa were a democracy, "re-call!" would be heard across the land. but it's not, and usans are gormless zombies presumably incapable of getting democracy, or even of perceiving the need. shame really, inheriting a national culture of wealth worship has somehow stilled the voice of those who are not rich. raised to be the slaves usa was created to preserve. irony, innit.
mr hartmann and pr wolff are valuable members of usa society, alarm bells, raised voices, alternative ideas. but even a very loud alarm, a brilliant idea, is useless if there is no one with the will or power to respond. the lack of democracy turns almost all usans into labor units solely, and recently, ex-labor units.
someone is going to organize those 40 million people into a political unit. i wonder if it will be a chavez, a peron , a guevara, or that old favorite, hitler.
not a hitler, i think, hitler had much better material to work with. but socialism will go down well with that group, sanders may regret selling out the left.
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
there will always be a party of the rich [dems] and a party of the richer still, currently the repugnicans. it's built into the structure of the state, and the culture of usa.
this is why nations disappear- their political apparatus becomes obsolete and the culture prevents change. but usually they just stagger on, reduced in power or subservient to a stronger neighbor. this looks like the future of the usa- gifted with safe borders, but unable to compete with the natural power of a resurgent china. i imagine the usa will become the 'russia' of the west, second rank power, or third.
it's no use being dignified or 'intelligent,' if you are convinced the world is flat, are perfectly comfortable with the notion that the elite should rule, and the commons accept their place in life, even if it is starvation.
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
just come out and say it: "there are would-be nazis among you."
in fact, nathaniel bush, dubya's grandfather, was a nazi sympathizer, that's why the family moved from connecticut to texas after the war. never any shortage of thugs yearning to be free, in the usa. for now, they have to make do with joining the local police force.
'what is to be done?' lenin's rhetorical question at least had an answer, however dubious. for the usa, perhaps there is no answer: the bad guys were in power at the beginning, and clever enough to make change near impossible.
chris hedges is slightly optimistic, he thinks revolution might be possible some day. damned if i can see it. there is time pressure--- the climate collapse now in train is beginning to exert an economic pressure in most nations, which will only get worse. it may cause wars which are so catastrophic that it relieves pressure on the environment, but that is the kind of 'solution' which may be its own extinction.
the right path is simple: get democracy, use it to create socialist societies which invest heavily in green power, and don't waste money on war. what could be easier?
in practice, h. sap. doesn't seem to be that smart.
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
the limit of the american voter's hope, is that some kind politician will sling a few bucks in his or her direction. this is not 'left' politics, it is submission politics. right-wing politicians do it too, it's cheaper than patrolling the streets with tanks.
real left politics is shifting power into the hands of the people, typically by establishing democracy. democracy is the left, all else is various forms of elitism.
politicians will never give you democracy, it has to be taken, usually with some measure of force.
not enough citizen quality people in usa, so democracy will not come. but you can content yourself with hoping for a fairy god-mother in politician guise, obama played that role very well, walking on water while leaving no footprints.
somehow bernie and obama seem different, probably because bernie has been slogging while obama danced . bernie is too good for the usa, although that's a low bar- a nation that elects trump when there was a least one other candidate is in dire straits. just think how contemptible you have to be, to lose to such a person.
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
still talking about democracy in the usa. that is not productive.
the reason nothing changes is that the people do not have the power to change things, and the elite are happy with things as they are. as they should be - madison delivered a plutocracy, just as he said he would.
first, get citizen initiative, the power to change. then talk about threats to democracy, and what to do about it.
btw, lately there has been little feelers about secession on the web. worth supporting, when you see them. the westcoast could be a democracy very easily, and perhaps the north east, as well. central usa is bubbaland, leave them to their own futile fascism.
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
usa has been printing money since nixon, eventually people lose interest in thei usd. the rise of china creates an alternative. nothing to do with the fed, which cannot balance an economy that does not make things. trump may well be the catalyst, since he is blank outside of his personal welfare. think rhino in a china shop.
but once again, trump is not the problem- the problem is the constitution. it permits people defective in character, intellect, education and experience to occupy the oval office, senate and house, and thereby direct the nation for their personal profit.
i am not sure why the american people can not see the need for democracy, in recent years i have selected ' 'genetic defect' as the most likely explanation. but it could be defective education, supported by a quasi-religious regard for a document written to empower slave plantaion grandees to rule a nation of ignorant bumpkins.
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
don't they have history classes in high school, anymore? the whole purpose of the constitution is to enable the rich to rule, as they have for most of usa existence.
there was a small shift caused by the great depression, which brought the seeds of socialism to usa, and the soldiers returning from ww2 needed to be employed, but the 'new deal' and 'gi bill' put out the fire. normal service returned, and the rich bought back their nation, one politician at a time.
it is pointless to blame reagan, or credit him with great political acumen. he was just using the tools created for him by madison.
there was never a time when the rich were not pressing for control of the nation, and using it to further enrich themselves.
there is no cure but revolution, and the rich will never go quietly- they own the army.
don't despair- the army is the refuge of the poor, and nowadays the officers come from that demographic as well. sometimes you get a rebel in uniform.
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
the problem is fundamental, a feature of american culture. americans accept an aristocracy of wealth, and while they are willing to submit, there is nothing to be done.
they were locked out of citizenship with the establishment of the federation, and from that moment began to accept 2nd class membership in society. it's built in to law, and custom now. they don't even dream of democracy, it is so far out of reach.
once you accept great power confined to small numbers of people, wealth will be concentrated too, and contrariwise. the rich buy power, the powerful acquire wealth.
which is why democracy is feared in america- it leads to socialism. madison was well aware of this, and promoted his constitution to the founding convention as a protection against democracy and resultant socialism.
the many can always rule, if they are wise enough to organize, but oligarchies keep their plebs ignorant and brain-trained. this has proved successful around the world and through-out history, as america demonstrates so very well.
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
yer way too late. aristotle boiled politics down to 2 words: "who decides?"
when the people decide, through referendum and initiative, you live in a democracy, and are citizens.
but you don't decide, it's not a democracy, and you are only civilians.
you should know this, but you don't. no accident, your schools are training camps.
worse yet, you don't have the community spirit that would bond you together to overthrow the elite. that's no accident either.
freedom! freedom! freedom! if you worship freedom, you are alone, and alone you can do nothing in politics. the greeks called such people 'idiots'
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
no use reporting the crimes of oligarchy, if you will not use the word ' oligarchy, ' if you will not describe the alternative of democracy, and point out how it will prevent those crimes.
of course if you have to describe democracy, it means you haven't got it.
the crimes of oligarchy are implicit in the society. every society in which the rulers are few must operate on secrets and lies, or the plebs will be aroused. at the same time, the elite are never satisfied with their share of the wealth, however great. so society collapses.
process visibly advanced in my lifetime, notably in the area of education. no one discusses the relation of social structure and consequent function. that lack of intellectual investigation is terminal.
florida was crooked when i lived there, doubtless more crooked now. it will always be crooked, when the people are not the masters.
what did lincoln mean, when he said, ..."of the people, by the people, for the people..." that was not the usa, then, now, or ever., he was a liar, and he meant, as every politician means, 'let me rule you, it won't hurt as much as the alternative."
people who put up with this are slaves by nature.
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
trump might want to take usa with him, so long as he didn't have to go himself. but there is a coward in there, or at least a profound belief that his own welfare is paramount. unlike the born-to-rule pnac gang that pulled dubya's strings, he has no confidence in surviving actual warfare. whatever he says, he will shy away from triggers. be thankful- you could do worse than trump, and frequently have.
otoh, the government of the usa is a rickety old georgian mansion, rotten timbers, rusted pipes, cracked windows, inhabited by self-interested politicians literally incapable of concern for the general welfare of the nation. the performance of the organs of state is about that of the latter days of the austro-hungarian empire.
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
not many people have rights in usa. 'rights' are freedoms held by the ruling class, in the usa that is a few hundred politicians, and a few thousand plutocrats that have the politicians on speed-dial.
most people have privileges, which are freedoms extended by the ruling class to useful people - employed and submissive. they can be withdrawn by the politicians, as here we see. that is the nature of privileges.
if you are too frightened to fight, or too lazy, or too dim to understand that politics is about power, not wishes, then you will be a member of the lower class, in a society with an upper class.
democracy is not free, and not natural. it only comes by struggle, either violent or with the threat of violence.
so far, the people of usa have not understood this.
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
usg has secrets, but the grosser actions arise from structural considerations.
the gop maintains a grasp on power with a smaller natural base, because the other gang is more diverse, much more alienated, and attracts less money.
scotus did not turn against democracy, because usa is not a democracy. it is an elective oligarchy in structure, and functionally a plutocracy.
scotus turned its back on roe vs wade because 5 of its members decided that was right. they might be venal, or crazy, but that doesn't matter. they have the power, and used it.
allowing any 8 people to have that much power is a measure of the quality of all the other people in the usa.
if you want to complain, step over to a mirror. there's the weak link.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
i insist: democracy is the label for a political society ruled by its members, equally. in modern times, a society directed by regular and frequent referendum, under the control of the electorate exercised by effective and accessible citizen initiative.
'capitalism' is not even a political system, much less a democracy. it is a label for a society captured by wealth, ruled by control of wages and employment, and presence of a variety of employment contracts.
actual politics is of trivial importance, since the agents of wealth hold the offices of state.
and that is why plutocracy can function as a shadow government.
actual democracy does not happen in the federal sphere of the usa. there is literally zero co-relation between public opinion and public activity.* somewhat surprising since about half the states might be democracies if they were independent. why in the world do they not band together and establish federal democracy, or leave the federation?
because they are all ruled by a politician aristocracy. which would literally disappear if real democracy were imposed, at state or federal level. who will put themself out of work?
so if you actually want democracy, it must come from outside conventional politics. difficult!
on the other hand, conventional politics is destroying the planet. dilemma!
* princeton uni. did a large scale analysis, with this conclusion. but - this was for the economic lower 90%. for the top 10%, very good co-relation. madison would be proud of his work, he promised the constitutional convention that wealth would rule, and he has delivered, ever since.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
not much point in analysing religion, but as a marker for brute greed, hunger and rage, it's fast and reliable.when you have an iq of about 80, it makes as much sense as science, and is pretty maleable, so any number of conmen have made a career out of it. the sad fact is, the most militarily powerful nation has an ignorant and credulous populace, and an amoral elite willing to say anything to get what they want.
nothing unique about that, but our weapons threaten extinction quickly, industry only a little less quickly, and political discourse is still at the georgian level, with occasional dips into feudal banditry.
young people are entitled to be really angry with oldies, but fortunately, most are too ill-educated to understand what's happening.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
nothing good will come from listening to politicians. listening to them legitimises their power.
the people under oligarchy must organise around the basic principle, the necessity, of getting democracy, and bringing the nation under the rule of the citizens.
it should be easy, because so obvious.
but usans are raised to believe that allowing their 'betters' in politics to rule them is necessary and beneficial.
you would think that any half-wit could see through that proposition, but even knowing better is no help if you are afraid to act, or can not act due to an eating habit. or worse - many have been convinced they should feed their children before they raise the banner of rebellion.
politicians are push-overs, folks. mass 10.000 would-be citizens around their home to deliver a polite request to establish the rule of the citizens through initiative, and they will see the logic of your request,
bring rope and torch, for the slow learners.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
hyenas eat wildebeest, is that murder? not really. it keeps the wildebeest population down, saving some grass for continuing generations. so too with rich people. unfortunately, there is no check on rich people population, so they strangle their society. no use blaming them, if you have no means to control them.
there is a way, called democracy. but democracy requires some social elements not widely present in human society. once you have democracy, you can raise children to preserve it, but getting it is nearly impossible. just too many people lacking the character for citizenship. these 'civilians' are the great majority of usa, and many are unconcerned with politics, and the rest see their personal advantage in maintaining elite rule.
with luck, the usa empire will dissolve, and the nation join russia in the 2nd rank. there is also a possibility for the blue states to secede, leaving a diminished usa occupying bubbaland.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
if usa were a democracy, public affairs would be public. but it isn't. the machinations of politicians may inspire dismay in the minds of the civilian population, but if they do not have the self-respect necessary to inspire revolution, to get democracy, talk is empty. barr can give an airy finger to talking heads, content in the knowledge that there is no guillotine in view, nor any large group threatening his pension.
watching the american government publicly despising the commentariat has a certain charm, since it is habitual and legal. since you know nothing will be done, or can be done short of raising the red flag, one can savor the whining for flavor and endurance. and of course, the talkers make a living at it, it's all kabuki.
7
-
7
-
a sane and ethical jew! who knew?!
the original invaders, with ben gurion and jabotinsky, were clear about what they were doing. "we're strong, you're weak, flee or die!" in order to do that, you have to re-classify your victims as sub-human, not entitled to life or property. from there, only hatred can arise, in response to contempt and oppression.
once you are on the tigers back, it is dangerous to get off, or so it seems. that hatred is a wound spring.
it's been done, in south africa, in the usa, with mixed results.
but israel has a special problem, widespread sympathy for the nazi crime, and usa support as a base in the middle east, makes apartheid seem viable, long after other conditions would have compelled some equitable settlement. 'equitable' is perhaps too kind, israel should not exist. but it does, so let's move on, as best we can.
i recommend the creation of a secular state of palestine, directed by a u.n. agency, charged with unwinding property and building a workable administration. human tights violations have to be ignored. otherwise no hope of peace.
this would entail the dissolution of israel. however well deserved, seems unlikely.
but what else will cure the israeli situation.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
madison told the delegates to the constitutional convention that his document would ensure the rule of wealth, and he delivered. it wasn't difficult. he understood the structure of the british society, which he admired above all. no democracy there. the wealthy ruled, and no murmur from the lower orders got far. he only left because the brits were beginning to make slavery difficult.
you are living in a toxic time bubble, and it is both unjust and inefficient. perhaps worse, it raises a nation of political cripples. it is no accident that usa is a nation of one right-wing party, and a second farther right wing party.
you need a new constitution. but with the populace you have to work with, progress is unlikely.
it turns out, 'catch-22' encapsulated the fate of the nation.
please, on the way out, refrain from burning down the planet out of childish pique. it's all yer own fault.
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
guns are not the problem. but since you can not face reality, there is something to be said for reducing this particular irritation. in other nations, people go berserk too, but only have knives and swords to work with.
when usa has 50 casualties, instead of 5, it is because jefferson feared the the government lapsing into brutality. so he thought the people should be able to shoot back. not a bad idea, in principle.
but people don't shoot politicians, unfortunately. too far away, living on a different planet, effectively.
'costing' these massacres is a cute way to ignore the fundamental malaise of usa. it passes the time, earns a dollar, and masquerades as political analysis.
usa is an insane asylum, ruled by sociopaths, and no one in the place has any notion of how crazy they are.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
don't disturb yourself. you haven't got democracy, so can't lose it. many wouldn't want it, anyway.
it requires citizen quality people, prepared to think about public affairs, and a sense of community, a belief that other citizens will treat you fairly, and you will reciprocate.
that's not usa, is it.
in the usa, politics is chariot racing, with a blue team and a red team. no ideology, just winning and losing, and sharing the spoils. lately the sharing hasn't reached down the economic ladder very far, and the national model is creaking. it will break soon, being far divorced from reality.
no matter, except that massive military might be put to use, to patch up the civil model. and that will be the end of all of us.
it was inevitable that a nation driven by greed would be deformed and would acquire a cancerous military aspect.
so you could say the coming gotterdammerung is inevitable, fate written in the birth of the nation..
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
at some point, americans will start to use all those guns, i suppose. endemic banditry will be an easy transition from the turf wars of drug gangs. it won't do any good, and usans just don't have the political experience to knit together effective revolution. so instead of ruling with lies, their masters will have to show the losers the barrel of the gun. by then, usa will be well down any civilization ladder.
progressives, so called, should move to the west coast, and prepare to break away as the federation weakens. california by itself is a viable midlevel nation, add oregon and washington, and a trade corridor from canada to south america could be established, 'south of the border' could be liberated from the cia, and the drug laws, promoting general prosperity. pack up, get moving!
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
mass murder is not lack of compassion, it is lack of democracy, and lack of socialism.
a population of alienated people, driven to desperation by loss of work, of family, of hope, will generate a percentage of mass murderers. in the usa they have automatic weapons, other societies make do with kitchen knives.
usa prides itself on the lack of concern for others, and the others respond, now and then, with unconcern for your life.
it seems appropriate, 'do unto others what they do unto you, but do it first.'
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
poverty is built in. madison explained why his constitution would ensure the rule of the rich, so that the grandees who controlled the states would ratify it. [it was not an act of 'we, the people,'] it's purpose he said, was to stop the taxes on the rich being spent on the welfare of the poor. those grandees thought that was an excellent idea.
and it was, it worked then, and continues to work. the people of the usa have no formal means to control the activity of the nation, no initiative power, and politicians are not going to hand over the keys to the bank.
so the choice is revolution, or poverty. so far, the level of education and nutrition has prevented the idea of revolution from appearing. which is why coca-cola, white bread and contentless education is commonplace in america. a nation that talks frequently about hope and democracy, but has none of either.
6
-
6
-
i have no respect for fdr. he was the best on offer, but i came across a history document, of a conversation with fdr, in which someone made the suggestion that the time was right, to introduce constitutional amendments establishing democracy, and the aristocrat/politician dismissed the suggestion with a single sentence., 'no, that's too much.' but it froze my politician-meter on the 'just another parasite' mark.
and now? it was always too late for the usa. the general level of political literacy remains low, the character of the people is stunted by growing up 2nd class. the only change will be by coup, which can never be good.
the tell-tale is the feeling, "we need a leader like fdr..."
you really need someone better than that, by far. god might fail, with only americans to work with.
what you need is a wide-spread feeling that, together, we are better than any politician. you never hear that.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
a useful summary of global struggle. not sure how much use it is, in a world where most people are struggling to find the rent, and feed their children. logic comes last when parasite governments drive their people to welcome war as the answer to all problems. one reason or another, a new dark age is unfolding, population crash, even extinction , seems very likely.
and we remain in the grip of politicians, a group whose personal status depends on getting elected, at whatever cost to the future, whose personal wealth depends on selling their power to the rich, who never worry about the future, for they own it. homo sapiens culture is dysfunctional. it will be the death of us.
6
-
can't work together, usa is determined to be the world hegemon, china will have equality, at least.
but it's wrong to talk about nations, since most people play no role in decision. only the swiss, really.
usa government is an adjunct of the rich and well-to-do people, who are used to running the world for their profit.
they won't compromise until they see the muzzle of a gun. and they hire people to do that. prc is developing faster, is better integrated, and suspects they are smarter.
we will be lucky to survive this struggle. i believe the best strategy for the ants is to gnaw at the foundations of usa wealth and power. at the very least, stop pretending usa is directed by any principle but greed and arrogance, supported by professional murderers and thugs.
6
-
6
-
if you say 'shrinking middle class' you are also saying 'expanding lower class.' but murrukins never say that, they are not only 'untouchable,' they are invisible. human discards, surplus to requirements. not invisible to me, i was away from usa for 10 years, and when i came back, every public space was filled with rough sleepers, hundreds sometimes. something went really bad, in the 80's, and shows no sign of repair.
the only place in usa where the discards are numerous and visible, is in crime fiction. there, they are background, and frequently actors in usa society. in reality, there is plenty of theft at middle and upper levels, but the grossly enlarged number of lawyers keeps most of it out of jail, or least in short-term uniformed 'resorts.'
skillful crime fiction captures usa more accurately than traditional media, and more widely.
perhaps that is because the society is crooked by nature? or at least, living in an alternate reality.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
only common sense necessary, but not much in view in the usa. i grew up there, and thought it was the best nation in the world, well, everyone said so.
but one day while frag bombs and napalm was 'democratizing' a village in vn, i realized i was an agent of hell. usa has not improved, since then, and looking back at the history with clearer vision, it was born evil.
you can not look at reality. you dare not report what you see. so words and actions are without useful consequence.
with luck, usa will recede into secondary importance, as uk has. the world will be a better place if the stars and stripes are not seen abroad.
or you may destroy the world, 'to save it.' greed has metastatized into psychosis in usa boardrooms, and death may seem to be better than reduced income. death for others, of course.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
the monroe doctrine created a continental empire, in design, reality appeared in steps, and national governments that showed signs of undesirable behavior, generally came to a quick end, often bloody.
most governments 'south of the border' have been visited by the us marines, if any desire for independence appeared, and in modern era, the cia would appear with assassins or bribes to inspire dictatorships of amiable locals.
the failure of this assemblage of governments, marked not only by failure to attend but even more by outright disdain for usg, and expressions of support for the 3 nations currently on the usg black-list, is an occurence that will be in history books as a pivotal moment.
5
-
when i was a young lad, julie london had a big hit on the jukeboxes, many many tears ago, and there is a phrase from one of her songs that ms. iversen put's me in mind of "you can cry me a river, but..."
i'm not interested. you don't want to do business in china, stay home, go to africa, but don't complain. usa is used to doing business while holding a gun in hand, but the gun's an ak47 [knock-off, prc is an equal opportunity tech vulture] in china's hand now. i'm strong on modern history, and utterly unimpressed with any part of usa culture. i quite enjoy hearing yanks complain about being pressed into unequal treaties and trade deals- long past time for 'the great satan' to pay for sins past, without number.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
instead of talking endlessly about people, why not look at the society and political structure that puts a 'trump' in the oval office? if you do that, you can begin to think about changing things to put better national managers in office. not entirely impossible. the original progressive movement, early 1900's, organized people sick of corruption and incompetence in their state governments to re-write their constitutions. as a result, about half the states have some, or all, of the features of democracy. california is a good example, while they still elect politicians, much of the legislation is controlled by referendum, and sometimes initiative and recall, as well.
until you get democracy, talking about people is wasted. it just needs one trump to trash the nation.
the consistently poor management of the nation should be obvious to all. it is the natural result of the constitution, written chiefly to empower the rich.
5
-
5
-
trump is what you get from the current political system. if you had enough citizen quality people, you could convert to democracy. if you had democracy, you would raise more citizen quality people. right away you should see the core of america's troubles. it's not rocket science. compare california [democratic constitution, several world class universities] with southeastern usa. trump voters, biden voters, and good football teams. slavery still defines usa, and the shadow of history affects education and health. not so strangely, those ignorant, biased, southerners are the core of the republican strength, and the base of the militarist psychology that makes it appear 'natural' to have special forces, assassination teams and occupying armies all around the world. in defense of democracy! usa is insane, top to bottom.
5
-
5
-
5
-
'representative democracy' is just the meeting hall of aristocrats, struggling for supremacy and resulting power and wealth. it has nothing to do with democracy. the struggle ensures that as different men or groups come to power, the national direction will change course, often in reverse. meanwhile, in china, educated men with personal history of management accomplishments at lower levels are forging 5 and 10 year plans, and carrying them out. by no surprise, when they decided to do [managed] capitalism, it has performed beyond the best days of usa.
china will soon be the leading society of humanity, unless usa makes war, or unless the coming climate crisis is not resolved successfully. both possibilities all too likely.
but americans vote? for what? which dim-witted narcissist will rule them? that's not democracy, that's feudalism with ballots replacing arrows.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
the usa was founded on lies, starting with "we, the people." less than 10% of the men could vote, and no women at all. the immediate purpose of the constitution was to preserve slavery for as long as possible , and ensure the rule of the 'opulent' over the 'mob' indefinitely. it worked and has continued to work very well. yet americans worship it, as dogs worship their masters, kind or cruel. conservatives have every reason to value the constitution, progressives nearly as much, losers don't matter.
'conservative' is simply a person who benefits greatly from the resulting society, a 'progressive' is one who is doing well from it but thinks they should have more.
the 30 -50% of the populace who seldom or never vote are losers who have nothing to hope for from either party. no word for it in american, because, in a sense, they don't exist. 'loser' will have to do, but not entirely apropo, since most were never in the race.
there is not much reality in political discussion, since the national myths are agreed to by the political classes, and only personal point-scoring holds the stage.
when was the last time you heard "maybe we should change to democracy?" never? have you heard "why is the military bigger than the next 7 nations combined?" not often, eh?
5
-
the trade war is lost. so usg reverts to type, and threatens war. by itself it is a significant presence, but not overwhelming. so the plan seems to be, lure, buy or threaten support in sufficient size to frighten prc into submission. this will not work. actual war is suicidal. so prc will simply continue building roads and trade, and mutually advantageous treaties. 10 years from now, usa will split into 3 pieces, as gb has done, and become just innocuous 'usttabe grand' nations.
or so i hope. the alternative is armageddon, quite a lively possibility. the orcs who run usa have no recent experience with successful resistance. to them, i urge that they give deep thought to the viet nam war. usa never lost a battle, but couldn't beat a people equipped with 2nd hand weapons and 1st class courage.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
the foreign policy of the usa is simply, everything is ours, if we can take it. late-stage capitalism regards the military as a marketing tool.
it is not a matter that should be in the hands of any one person, or any small group. it should be in the hands of the electorate, through referendum. democracy is the way people defend their lives from elites, who are always willing to send the chumps off to war to enrich their masters. and they are chumps. they actually imagine the constitution is a good thing. but it disconnects them from the management of their public concerns, and you see the results all around you, yet do nothing. that is chumpery, at national scale and endemic prevalence.
not unique of course, only the swiss have reached democracy, almost by accident. homo sapiens simply is not that bright- sapiens only by contrast with tree sloths..
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
only congress can 'declare war,' but congress decided long ago to issue a blank check to presidents, to avoid being identified with continual military action. so various 'police actions' are carried out, often indistinguishable from war, but sometimes merely assassinations, coups, and assisted regime change.
the usa is not a democracy, and the cow people watch their masters do murder abroad, and only anger when those murders draw some retribution.
the usa is not uniquely contemptible, but it is in the first rank, and notable for the hypocrisy they wrap around their crimes.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
when the nazis announced to the swiss that they would send a commission to direct the swiss for the duration of the war, two things happened: in the first 24 hrs, about 10% of the militia reported to their mustering station, and two weeks later, a referendum was held with a simple question, "shall we submit?" more than 90% of the citizens said "no." and that is what democracy is. the usa is no kind of democracy, and the people are not citizen quality. so be kind to the ozzians, they are you.
the situation is no better in oz, or anywhere, because the federation of helvetia is the only national democracy in the world. h. sap. is not suited to democracy, gormless wimps for the most part, hag-ridden by predator sociopaths.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
i do wish people would stop talking about the end of democracy in usa. it never started.
what is happening is the gradual transfer of power from senate to president. see 'decline and fall of the roman empire.'
call it one of the results of globalization of commerce.
trump is a buffoon, but the senate is worse - senile and degenerate. they make even a buffoon look briefly competent.
and he is competent, in the only test an american politician is measured by, he got elected. simply a measure of the competition, of course.
will he pass the next test, re-election? perhaps not, but look at the quality and record of the putative successor, and tell me the usa political system is adequate to modern demands.
that is the serious lack in usa society. the blind acceptance of a political system designed to empower slave plantation magnates, a system already obsolete when the south seceded. the constitution remains. the magnates run for-profit prisons, for-profit armies, for-profit health care, and perform politics for profit too.
and seemingly no one notices. that is the terminal disease of nations. apres moi, le deluge!
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
why is trump president?
1. republican contenders had nothing to offer the out-of workers, and could not win,
2. the democratic contender had nothing to offer the out-of workers and could win, by lying, but thought it unnecessary.
3. he needed a new job, and not fussed about public lying, to extend the pretense he was not an idiot. turned out the competition were worse idiots. pleasant surprise, eh?
4. the american electorate wanted to send a message to the elite. they did, but the elite refused to accept, feeling sure that more porridge would just enliven trouble-makers.
5. there is a limit to the long con, nearly there. but you won't be happy with biden either. people like him are why a creature like trump can be president.
6. and there will be worse than trump, and biden. it's built in to your society.
why is usa declining?
1. you still haven't figured it out?
4
-
4
-
btw, a bit of english language, evidently unknown to pm may: monarchies don't have referendums, they have plebiscites. that's because the people are not citizens, but merely plebs. or, a face-saving 'civilians.' if it had been a referendum, in a democracy, there would be no talk of the need for a people's vote, because the citizens had already decided.
these are important distinctions, because it is vital that the people of britain realize they do not live in a democracy. how else can they hope to live in a democracy, if they are fooled into thinking this is it?
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
harry truman laid the fuse of the vn war, when he handed vn back to the french. not just any french, either: the french in vn were taking orders from vichy, and then the japanese, and when the japanese put their hands, the french hired them to police the cities until france could send more soldiers and admin to vietnam. this taught the vietminh that friendship with the west was impossible. just too treacherous.
vietminh chucked the french out, usa took over. promptly backed a government led by catholiic elite, in a 90% buddhist nation. renegeged on u. n. plan for national referendum on re-unification, phonied up a casus belli in the gulf of tonkin and started winning hearts and minds with poison crop-dusters and napalm.
this was just warcrime, but usa too big to punish. so they lost, for a change. well done, peoples republic of viet nam. may have given hope to the people of iraq and afghanistan.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
the education system has not failed, it is the most effective tool in supplementing the constitution as a framework for plutocracy. it has not failed , because its purpose was not to create effective citizens of democracy. it has succeeded in its design purpose, very well. the people of usa are ignorant cattle.
there is no need nor much purpose in talking about economics to the people who are not citizens of democracy. one does not explain economics to pets or farm animals.
prof. wolff presupposes that usa is or is nearly, or at least should be a democracy. from that base, he can earn a living as an academic, explaining what governments 'should do' if they had the welfare of the people as a primary goal. but reality is otherwise.
marx made some valuable contributions to economics, but in the end, quasi-marxist societies have not flourished. political considerations have continued to rule human activity, often simple military rule, representative 'democracy' is popular, both governed for and by an elite, without much economic science.
so i came to the simplistic conclusion, that getting democracy is the only goal worth pursuing. all else is intellectual wuffle dust. with democracy, the people have the power to shape their society gradually to the consensus of what is fair. without democracy, you are without the tool of the individual in society- you are done to by the elite, and they are never your fairy god-mother.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
being a nazi in ukraine is sensible. ukraine hates russia, and they have some reasons, going back to the october revolution. lovable finnland cosied up to the nazis too, for similar reasons.
it wasn't because they liked nazis, so much as needing help from anywhere, against the threat of ussr.
but that was then. should ukraine trade on those past conditions to excuse current thugs, who are being supported by the usa?
in fact, usa has had mixed emotions about nazis, from the beginning. dubya's granddad got in trouble for his support of nazi germany, had to leave connecticut and move to texas, which is more tolerant of nazis.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
it was not just sold, usa is not, never was, a democracy. the nation is run by politicians, not the people, and they work for the rich. the nation was designed that way, and the design was very successful. democracy does not appear in the constitution, and the initial phrase, "we, the people" is just the first lie in usa politics. many have followed.
but if yer dim, ignorant or lazy, you deserve to be fooled, surely you see that? evolution in action.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
athenian democracy was harsh by modern standards, and did have some class constraints. we should aim to do better, nowadays.
in reality, modern democracy is not democracy at all. the citizens do not rule, not even in switzerland.
and in the usa, even the pretense is nearly abandoned.
politics is the field of power within a society, and the fundamental question is, "who decides.?"
aristotle understood that, and i marvel that contemporary 'intellectuals' do not ever examine this area. i suppose there is a consensus that 'nothing can be done.'
so political 'discussion' is superficial, and without consequence - mere pot-boiling and pastime.
while the people do not decide, they will always be cattle, at the mercy of some elite.
why then do they not rise up? they need leadership, and there is none.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
trump is not threat, not until he recruits a general to his support, and that does not look likely. usa political system, essentially georgian monarchy, is hopelessly obsolete, and trump's presence in the oval office is a measure of that degeneracy, not a reward for his competence.
you will stagger on for one or two more reigns, perhaps, but the inflation now built in to the economy will make military dominance hard to maintain. lackey states such as britain and australia will be forced to align with e. u. or china, and usa will be just another russia.
mind you, the inability of oligarchic societies to deal with climate pollution may well end global commerce. let's hope that result is in time to prevent extinction.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
you might like to think about this: the only democracy in the world was surrounded in ww2, by nazis and fascists.
but hitler did not invade. he pushed over france in weeks, but could not, or dare not, invade helvetian confederation.
that's because the swiss had universal military training, and every ablle-bodied man had a military rifle in the closet.
what's more, the monthly meeting for field and marksmanship competency was a strong bonding agent.
both sides shot at the swiss, from time to time, but the swiss shot back, with great effect.
in the usa, guns are only a tool for desperadoes, the notion of national community and mutual support never bloomed. might as well withdraw guns from the society.
but that's not yer problem. yer problem is national psychosis, and no cure in sight.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
let's start with 'democracy.' not many people know what it means.
it's a phrase in classical greek, 'citizens decide.' demos kratia. you see where we got 'democracy.'
athens was a democracy, in those days. nowadays, only switzerland is, just barely.
whose job is democracy? this is a nonsense question, politics is not a job in a democracy.
but usa is not a democracy, never has been. this is a bit strange, because about half the states have some or all the features of democracy.
notably california. if independent it would be a model democracy. not perfect, there are no politicians in a democracy. they are a hold-over from medieval days, the inheritors of the power of aristocracy.
but the phrase 'whose job is...' characterizes usa very well. usa is a nation that minimizes politics, to allow maximum power for the rich.
while it is an elective oligarchy formally, functionally it is a plutocracy. plutocracy exercises power through jobs, whether you have one, how much is the pay, how secure is the contract.
americans talk endlessly about 'our democracy,' when they have none. somewhat like eunuchs talking about sex.
presumably, the talk soothes for the lack.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
whatever planes they were flying from june to december, the sov air force was beaten up by lack of pilot training and effective organization. after december, hitler had lost, although there plenty of fighting to do. gradually, training organization and experience, plus massive numbers bent the war into soviet favor. so western airplanes were insignificant, simply because a good enough air force and superior tanks and tank production won the war.
the allies didn't send their best machines, and what they sent needed better avgas than the local birds, so welcome was always going to 'mixed.' what was valued was american trucks. they came in great numbers, were rugged, and allowed factories to concentrate on planes and tanks.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
no, don't blame reagan. blame james madison. he wrote a constitution whose purpose was to allow the rich to rule. principle was simple: concentrate all power in a political aristocracy, and buy, rent or be in that group. the rich do that. this power is not absolute, and hartmann's father was in the generation where the grip of the rich was relaxed, by a combination of the great depression and ww2. but the constitution still prevailed, and the rich slowly bought back their dominance.
democracy is the cure. in a democracy the poor and middles can use their numbers to combat the power of the rich to buy, by circumventing the politicians with citizen initiative. further, requiring assent to referendum and demanding open government obviates secret deals where money talks.
it's simple really: get democracy, and be a member of the ruling class, the people.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
politically, usa is and always has been an elective oligarchy. it was codified by james madison in a constitution modeled on the british polity, as an attempt to make a society in which the rich would be lightly taxed and seldom restrained in their business activities. 'capitalism' dignifies this society, but it is omnipresent under many names.
the rich, and/or powerful soon become powerful, and/or rich. you could call it 'fascism,' too.
it is important to keep in mind that this basic model of modern human society is ruled by very selfish people.
they are not acting for the good of the nation, much less for the good of the poor.
those who are successful in the power side of the elite, politicians in office, have to pretend an interest in the 'civilians.' aka chumps. and some specialize in bringing left-overs to the poor.
but none vote against their primary interest, the power of politicians.
so if you want real change, it has to come from outside the system.
if you will not discuss revolution, it's just play-acting.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
review the modern history of iraq, there are parallels which should make zelensky nervous.
saddam was paid and armed to attack iran, and when he failed to conquer, he was hanged, i suppose bush was irritated at him, and also needed a fall guy for the 9/11 attacks. plus, you get control of a major oil nation, and a base to attack iran.
this is multi-purposing, and also sociopathic crime on a grand scale. running errands for the usa is not a certain path to fortune. otoh, refusing to run errands is immediately fatal. one can sympathize with zelensky, but probably he looked no farther than the money.
4
-
4
-
a never-ending source of amusement. aristotle answered the primary question of society and has been ignored ever since.
from his survey of contemporary varieties of society, he extracted one key question: "who decides?"
he was a much more pragmatic man than modern socialists, and willing to confront the reality behind 'who decides.'
power directs human society, and if you wonder why the many get little from their labor, it is because they have little power.
blindingly obvious, one might think.
aristotle went on from this question, and concluded that democracy was the best that mankind could do. whatever questions might arise from execution, at least the many were trying to help the most people, themselves.
when power is devolved into the people, making them citizens of democracy, it is possible to create a society beneficial to most. they have the power to act with effect, and the will to make their lives better.
no other society can deliver this result.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
no, i think he is more of a 'john the baptist.' he reports the truth as he sees it, but has nothing to say about how to change things.
in my experience, americans think the constitution is graven on stone and stands beside the 10 commandments as a guide to social life. but in fact, the constitution was written to empower the rich over the many. by concentrating power in a few hundred people, wealth could buy them, one way or another, in sufficient numbers to create a gilded age.1 and now ga.2. one consequence of powerlessness is ignorance and passivity, a populace that can be molded by diseducation and genuinely fake news, such as the selling of iraq wmd.
things are not going to improve. rome didn't fall in a day, nor will the american empire.
3
-
3
-
3
-
the electoral college was formed to insure that the 'mob' did not rule america. the constitution was written to enable the few 'opulent' to rule the nation, chiefly through the senate, but with a firewall, [electoral college] of distinguished people ensuring that the president also was from and for the elite.
the constitution was not a charter for democracy. far from it. it was explicitly designed to empower the rich. until americans change it, they will be second class people in their own land, mere cattle.
today, electors are discussing changing the victor because the election did not get the 'right' result, in their personal view. this is no better than the founders, who had no respect for democracy. but neither is it any worse.
if you haven't got democracy, and you don't, then it's rule by the strong. these electors feel strong, but it is ephemeral, they will be replaced or ignored. jailed if unlucky. or shot.
america is a land without justice, and the law is only for the control of the poor. do as you please, electors, in the morning war and corruption will still be the motifs of american life.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
about 3 times a year, the swiss discuss what their nation should do, through referendum and initiative. that's as close to democracy as any nation gets. i believe their democracy is eroding, due to pressure from e. u. envelopment. even so, when hitler had them wrapped, and announced he was sending a management team to integrate them into his europe, the swiss had a referendum on what they should do. at odds of about 100-1, they answered, 'no, you won't.' they were what i call citizen quality people. the people of usa don't measure up. nor anywhere else, of couurse, but other oligarchies are much less inclined to claim 'democracy.'
so hang out your bedsheets, to replace a sociopath with a senile dement. that passes for citizenship nowadays.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
don't complain about what the thugs say, or do. there's always some around, and they are always a small minority. the weak point in homer saps character is the inability of 'ordinary' people to understand the need for democracy, as they are raised without it. no accident, society's masters have long ago induced the losers to think rule by politicians is 'democracy.'
result is, the chumps can not organize, can not believe in, much less effectuate, a democratic society.
read what chris hedges has to say, about every salient feature of usa society, and weep. he lays it all out, and offers no hope of reward, beyond that of justified rebellion, successful or not. chomsky has been doing similar things for 50 years or more, whence the resignation embedded in his face.
action may come from young people, they are very clear about the problem, many of them. i'm pretty sure they will have to shoot their way to sunshine, whatever the odds. being polite, like hedges and chomsky, gets you nowhere.
3
-
during the course of the vn war, i learned my native land was ruled by evil men. perhaps jfk had some of that opinion, and it got him killed.. rfk should have been guarded by his own men, but he was the dumb one. anyone claiming to be surprised by usa foreign policy simply hasn't been paying attention. chomsky keeps a 'crimes list,' more than a 100 entries. it doesn't matter, other nations are also ruled by vampires and ghouls, and they band together to suppress their enemy within- the people.
these sociopaths in expensive tailoring are leading us to population collapse, wars, possible extinction, and there is only one defense against elite rule, we must get democracy. how? mass organization, peaceful suggestion, and if that doesn't work, violent revolution.
would that work? bound to. just needs the 'mass.' and there might be the fatal flaw. nations have characters, and usa is notably submissive, on the left, such as it is.
and the orcs who cheerfully do the bidding of the elite are plentiful.
my guess is the talking heads will go on talking, to no avail, until some general gets tired of taking orders from someone who has never been shot at. the next phase of imperium is 'barracks caesars.'
3
-
3
-
answer: in a plutocracy, everything has a price. in a democracy, the will of the people directs public activity, through referendum and initiative. in a plutocracy, everything is for sale, even people. initially as slaves, then as wage workers, finally with pacification allowance, see 'ubi.'
meanwhile, at the top, people are so rich that ordinary expenses are meaningless, a life has meaning only in the status of the great numbers reported in fortune magazine.
madison would be proud. he put off the collapse of slavery but knew it would end, he created a society safe for wealth, even in its declining days.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
political parties in the usa are just gangs. there is no program for either party to improve the nation. there are empty promises, which are enough for the political empty heads of the american civilian.
trump is the perfect demonstration of this kind of politics, he is in office only because of contempt for the lies of the democrats. the ex-workers of industrial america had their revenge, without concern for the nation that had no concern for them.
the usa is finished. you can't compete with china while maintaining a nihilist population.
to bernie supporters: pray that he loses, for if he wins, he will be charged with responsibility for all the evils about to descend on america. he at least means well, and doesn't deserve that obloquy. [ look it up, i had to.]
there is a good chance that biden will implode under trump vituperation. he is very vulnerable, very fragile, and visibly in early senile dementia. the dnc anointment is a good measure of their corruption, and incompetence. dubya was a puppet, but in good health, biden is a china doll masquerading as an action figure.
america does not deserve better. at the current state of education and culture, bernie would be wasted. the 'progressives' are empty-headed children, with no ideas beyond choosing a kind master. so they are unable to generate mass support. there is in fact, more mass support for authoritarian government in usa, there are a lot of people who believe supporting a master is a better survival tactic than trust in fellow 'citizens.' they may be right.
anyway, watching american politics unfold is fascinating. much like 'decline and fall of the roman empire' in modern dress, and fast-forward. "lights, camera, action!"
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
i can not quite grasp why americans talk about 'democracy' in reference to usa. can it be so simple as that they don't know there are other words?
usa is an elective oligarchy. for historical reasons, elective aristocracy is more apposite. functionally, there is a shadow ruler, 'wealth.' so plutocracy would not be wrong.
but using democracy is wrong. worse, it confuses discussion, for if you think you have democracy, and don't, how can you ever get it?
'democracy' is a mild evolution of 'demos kratia', a classical greek phrase which was the label for a polity in which the citizens directed the state. the word is still functional now, california, and several other states, has referendum, initiative, and recall- aristotle might admit it is more democratic than athens. but not the usa, which has none of the functions of democracy.
the reason trump is president is because usa is not a democracy. it's not because democracy doesn't work, it's because you havn't got it. it's because you don't know what it is.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
'consciousness' is a complex question, children start off selfish because they have little insight into others. repeated applications of praise, candy and leather straps give them insight into other people, vis a vis, sharing. but that;s psychology.
when confronted with an adult whose guiding principle is "what's mine is mine, and so is anything else i can take," you must show him the gun. that's politics.
unfortunately, usans are strangely lacking in community spirit. so the strong take what the want, pay their muscle, and drive down the center of the street.
in a nation where there are more guns than people, it is amazing that the rich are able to seize and hold local domination, since they are necessarily hopelessly outnumbered. what is the matter with usans? filled with submissive genes?
3
-
3
-
3
-
the american constitution was designed to be like the british 'constitution' of george 3. a king/president had limitations, particularly at home, more power in foreign affairs.. the limitations were delivered by senate, by house and supreme court, think 'house of lords.' and lord high justice. the notion of a tyrannical king was met by having a very small national army, and large state militias. elections were safely in the hands of the rich with property qualifications limiting the participation of the mob.
it worked for geo. 3, and for the american rich until ww1. that brought usa into serious conflict with european continental armies, and the profits of mass munitions production. after the blip of the great depression, ww2 confirmed and magnified the shift to militarist imperial america.
an empire calls for an emperor, but so far the rich have been able to hold onto their nation. it is no accident that trump comes from money, rather than battlefield. he discovered that the political rulers of america were so inbred, effete and in effectual that an arrogant ne'er-do-well with family wealth could beat them at politics. he covered his surprise well. there's a couple of billionaires in the current field hoping to emulate him. too late.
america is shaky, and change may come soon. i think trump is not competent to initiate dictatorship, a man who is rude to his generals is less likely to get co-operation from them, unless he is seen as a stepping-stone by some not-so dim general.
bernie? best of luck. but i suspect the result of his election might be a reprise of the spanish civil war.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
well, the usa tried to buy ukraine, and have been quite successful. it doesn't cost much, politicians are cheap.
ukraine doesn't like russia very much, lots of bad history there.
but putin gets nervous at the prospect of usa rocket bases moving closer to moscow. so he decides to occupy ukraine.
could be starting ww3, but he knows the west, usa, is dollar-oriented. they will take-on small or weak nations such as vietnam or iraq, where profit seems assured. russia otoh, is dangerous, and usa doesn't do dangerous, no profit in being dead, and nuclear rockets can kill rich people, too.
the vile hypocrisy of the invaders of vietnam and irag and afghanistan, too, crying "shame!" should put a bend in the spine of any usan, but usans have absolutely no acquaintance with a sense of shame. a nation founded to extend slavery, and the near extermination of the native people, can not afford to be acquainted with shame.
chomsky, peace be upon that virtuous man, made a list of usa military adventures around the world, more than 100, as i recall, and most of them would be war-crime, if there was a court with the power to arrest usa. the rest were merely shameful.
putin fears the usa, with good reason. he doesn't want your stooges for neighbors.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
give more presence to the long view: cpprc is here to stay, but economic management of the nation will be pragmatic, and if that involves a period of 'natural' development then it will happen. but it is not capitalism because no principle or lasting direction is assumed. it's simply, let's see what works for now, with one eye on national activity, one on international reaction.
it may be that 'neoliberalism' was advertised merely to induce foreign investment, which resulted in a genuine 'great leap forward,' to challenging usa in economic power. that stage has passed, simply because usa realized that it was letting private investment in china cut the usa throat. marx had something to say, along these lines, and you can bet the very smart gents in the central committee were perfectly capable of executing this kind of economic kung fu.
the main mistake of western academia is to lose sight of the essential hollowness of 'capitalism' as a driving mechanism of national economy. it is just a polite word for greed, and generates no plans or policies of lasting consequence.
prc is being directed on a level far above any western nation. this will continue until the corruption of power overwhelms the rational management of the nation. cpprc is the new mandarinate, come to power through victory in civil war, as is the habit of history in china. at present they look like the premier society of mankind, and likely to stay there for a long time.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
democracy is what they do in the confederation of helvetia. the usa is an elective aristocracy, which runs on money, so it is a functioning plutocracy.
referring to the usa as any kind of democracy guarantees that nothing of much use will result from discussion, since the premise is a lie. worse yet, it is a lie generally agreed to, a perversion of language that orwell labeled 'double-think.' this is particularly apposite in the trump dynasty, as he has the vocabulary known as 'new-speak.'
and he's not alone- the republican party has crafted a large ruling minority out of yokels and political sociopaths, neither group notably eloquent.
really, the career of the american empire continues to amuse because of the flambouyant retreat from reality in speech, mixed with the particular brutality available to the government with the mix of surveillance and tech striking power we call 'modern.' what crime will they commit next, what corruption of language will they camouflage it in?
3
-
3
-
step back a minute: trump is president by legal process, he has no history, personal or public, to suggest he should be there. he got there because the democratic party is even more contemptible than he is. those of you capable of logic would conclude that the management selection process of the usa is hopelessly ineffective. but wait! there's more: the democratic party has come up with a demented dimwit to contend with trump next time. clearly the principle is, 'any demented dimwit can beat a trump.'
“If voting made any difference they wouldn't let us do it.” this was mark twain, clearly the design of the usg has been much the same since birth.
so i suggest a new strategy, to anyone interested in making a better nation, without gunfire: stay home, never vote and send an email to your politicians with a simple message: "give us democracy. or else." repeat every monday morning, tell friends to do the same. it might get results, certainly will with mass support. voting for people was always wrong. voting for referenda, initiative and recall are the right and duty of citizens. become a citizen, by standing up to politicians and demanding decisive power.
3
-
3
-
3
-
don't worry, mr hartmann, you can't lose democracy, when you've never had it.
you can lose a fantasy, a brief pain, followed by an opportunity to use the power of common interest to get democracy.
and here's the problem - most usans don't like the idea of democracy. they want to be ruled by someone who will treat them well. politicians always promise to treat them well, problem solved.
a nation of ignorant and passive people can not have democracy, and they won't be treated well. bummer, eh? sorry, usans, evolution in action, and you are the ustabee spear-carriers in the usa opera.
3
-
3
-
3
-
until nixon got in, usa politicians referred to themselves as the 'administration,' implying that usa was a democracy, doing the will of the people.
nixon took the mask off, even daring to create a palace guard wearing roman helmets. that lasted only days, but 'government' was here to stay.
and yet, there was no outcry, perhaps the cattle simply didn't know the difference. or they did, and were clear about their status.
usa has no referendum, and still less the over-riding power of initiative. when you refer to the usa as a democracy you debase the highest political ideal that homer sap has envisioned. worse yet, you ensure continuing servitude to politicians, and their rich patrons. why would you want to do that?
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
the management of the usa was flash-frozen in 1789, by a small number of slave plantation grandees and their smaller number of slave-importing shippers. greedy and selfish men whose grip on the economy of post-revolutionary usa determined the activity of the nascent state. their constitution rules usa still, it is no accident that the rich have a grip on the nation, that's the way it was designed to be.
trump is perhaps the first usa king-for-awhile to be so dim and/or psychotic that he measures everything, visibly, for its immediate value to himself. he won't be the last.
unfortunately, raised in this resulting culture, the people of the usa can not lift themselves out of servitude. many of them are eager to establish and participate in bandit gangs. the aristocrats of wealth will have no shortage of gunmen if the rules of civilization fail, as seems likely.
what to do? for individuals, emigration. or retreat to a plot of land large enough to feed yourself.
what to do, to save the nation? solutions are easy, but require people not widely present in usa society. so, easy, but near impossible.
china was 'saved' by a dozen men who decided to realize the ideas of marx in their homeland. their task was immensely greater, in appearance. so, not quite impossible. but i have not come across a voice with a plan as yet. aspiring politicians are certainly not the answer.
3
-
3
-
i think democracy is a wonderful idea, and necessary to the survival of our species.
i hope we will get some soon, but so far only trivial outbreaks are visible. even the swiss are losing the little they had.
so elites rule, everywhere. oligarchy is the natural state of homer sap, and the only point of interest, is what care they take of the cattle.
once you grit your teeth and look at material reality, "communism" and xi jin ping are the measure of outstanding performance. for now.
india is not. indian politicians can do little, and perhaps no more can be expected, looking at the cultural diversity of the nation.
modi talks about surpassing china, soon. in population, he's right. otherwise, laughable. simple village boasting, by a national leader. isn't anyone ashamed?
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
the rich have always been in control of the usa, although the 1930's saw a brief flowering of quasi-socialist influence on government, and warriors returning from ww2 demanded some benefits which caused the plutocracy some discomfort. but the vietnam war cemented the military-industrial-complex which inherited control of the nation. you could call it 'fascist,' but i prefer an all-american label: military-industrial-government- complex.' eisenhower canvassed friends about using that extended phrase, was advised that 3 nouns optimum, for public engagement. so migcism in america.
usa was never a democracy, its people never citizens. the rich rule still and always, the people are cattle, purposely diseducated, alienated by political impotence, impoverished by capitalism. talking won't fix it.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
unions are not the answer. been tried, and failed. getting democracy is the answer. when the ordinary people become citizens, the laws create a more equal society. when they are only powerless civilians, the rich flourish, because they own the people who make laws. pretty simple, really.
do people want democracy? maybe not. it requires effort, and organization, and a belief in the possibility that most others are like you in wanting a society that values everyone.
i'm afraid usa is filled with alienated and selfish people who have no capability of communal action. you can't have strong unions for the same reason. people can fight for unions, because the benefits are visibly theirs. the benefits of democracy are much greater, even vital, but not immediately personal.
without democracy, the law will favor the rich, not the unions. pretty obvious, you would think.
this has been the history of the usa, and it will continue to be an elective oligarchy, controlled by the rich.
you are just not 'citizen quality.' you are raised to respect money, not people.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
the establishment of modern israel was largely a european jewish operation at first. rich and politically active jews saw an opportunity in the break-up of the turkish empire and established 'colonies' by simply buying cheap land. local muslim leaders got nervous about it, but the jews had access to european money and guns.
'haganah' initially co-ordinated self-defense activity. but by 1925, their numbers and wealth and guns were sufficient to declare war on the muslim people of palestine. they made it clear, it was all going to be israel, "from the mountains to the sea." muslims must leave or die.
the brits were nominal masters of the region, and favored jewish immigration at first. baldwin had promised a 'homeland' in palestine for the jews. presumably for jewish support in ww1.
but when jabotinsky organized a jewish national army, british support cooled.
unlike haganah, irgun didn't mind shooting brits as an encouragement to leave them alone in sub-doing the muslims. irgun got on with it, brits stalled, ww2 diverted attention. but the usa took an active interest. american jews flooded irgun with money, guns, and men. jewish refugees provided lots of manpower, greatly motivated.
the muslims were killed, driven out of their homes, and into barren lands behind walls.
israel should not exist, but it does. but it doesn't have to be israel. it could be incorporated in the secular nation of palestine. until the u. n. organizes this, it is the puppet of the usa.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
'our democracy' is in some danger, but that's because it's not democracy at all. because it's not democracy, it raises people who are not citizen quality. it also raises people who are told frequently they are inferior, and only seldom any use. such people cling to demagogues, and racism.
usa will survive in some form, but until educated people admit they do not have democracy, they will not get it. they will have dictatorship, very likely. or the charade of elections will continue to soothe the people into submission to the rich, for awhile longer. but not much longer- standard of living will continue to fall, and the orcs proliferate, for there can only be one default state for a nation living in lies. reality will ultimately intrude.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
capitalism isn't really a system. it is an economic phenomenon that results from a political system best characterized as banditry in suits.
parliament, and its mutant off-spring, congress, are just the meeting of inheritors of warlords, meeting occasionally to divvy up loot and adjust boundaries.
the warlords discovered the use of bankers, who smiled and were so useful that soon the bankers ruled the warlords.
neither in britain nor usa has the notion that labor is entitled to a decent life entered the mind of politician [ ex-warlord, several generations removed ] nor banker [ plutocrat nowadays, why work when you own most of the money? ] the brits had some success with labor unions, but it didn't last. so did usa briefly after ww2, but it didn't last- the jobs went abroad for their health. plutocrats health that is. so unions are not the answer. politics rules economics, the gun makes decisions.
if you are one of the ex-employed, or can fore-see that you will be soon, you want things to change. i should specify, get better and remain better. they will certainly change for the much worse unless there is a massive force from the unrich.
if you want a society that provides a decent life for all its members, there is only one path likely to deliver:
get democracy, use citizen initiative to shape the economy to include all its members. aka, socialism to whatever degree the citizens want.
simple, isn't it? what are you waiting for?
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
if you want truth, it's simple: usa activities in middle east made a lot of people angry, and one of them, obl, financed a demonstration of that anger referred to as '9/11,'
americans were out-raged to learn, that what their government did overseas, had consequences at home.it does seem unfair, but it's not- it happens throughout history and everywhere. if you don't like it, get democracy, use it to make sure the management of the nation represents the will of the electorate. then there will be no nasty surprises.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
no need to explain usa with religious references, greed and arrogance are built in to humanity, from birth. most families manage to civilize their children, many fail. usa parents don't get much help from society in this area, or any other. a notably dysfunctional society blessed with good geography, which benefit has been wrung dry.
finland is not scandinavian, by the way, not germanic, at all.
there is no mechanism to reform usa to scandi norms, although wishful thinking is excusable, they make a better model of human life than most.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
this is actually important in a way that is seldom talked about. everyone blathers on about the the presidential candidate, but in fact, presidents don't legislate. obama should have reminded the nation, that it was designed to be static, and unresponsive to the popular vote. unfortunately, fdr had total command of the senate and house, and did not use the apparent opportunity to establish democracy with constitutional amendment. that example suggests that even if yang gets in, the usa will not be saved. it is a ship of state, one on auto-pilot set by james madison, and destined for the rocks of elite corruption. i wouldn't mind, but likely to take the rest of the world into extinction as well.
3
-
in my view, when madison excluded democracy from his constitution, he created a political aristocracy more tightly in charge of the nation than the traditional government of britsin, on which it was modeled. in any event, every elite rule must work in secret, to keep the chumps ignorant and pliable, and must inevitably rot, secrecy and entitlement have that effect on homo sapiens.
it's easy to rail at trump- he is the distorted fun-house mirror of usa society, but never forget the central fact- the political system offered a choice of trump and clinton, and trump was believed to be least bad. i'm not certain that was a mistake, when you consider that the dnc is now offering a corporatist hack who can't finish a sentence or a thought, surely the system must be to blame, not the cripples it pops up.
in any event- a nation incapable of democracy is not well-placed to complain of the quality of their masters. dim, ignorant or lazy never prospers and often wears chains.
"Those who do not move, do not notice their chains." r. luxemburgh, a lady not afraid to move, in a society where movers were murdered.
3
-
3
-
face reality: the usa is not a democracy. the usa foreign policy has no purpose but to enrich american corporations. to that end, the usa government will commit any crime, and support any puppet state, and invade any state that resists, if victory can be cheap. in short, when khomeini styled the usa as 'the great satan,' the metaphor was perfectly apposite.
many rich jewish people are prepared to spend big money in support of israel. one can understand their motivation, while resisting their ability to subvert american foreign policy.
but the real problem is the constitution of the usa. it has led to the creation of a fundamentally corrupt and incompetent government, and an equally defective people: ignorant, violent, arrogant and frequently blinded by antique religiosity. no good can happen there.
i applaud attempts to resist the national myths, admire the courage, but can see no hope of success. all societies bloom, flourish and fail throughout history, and usa is entering its 'fail' time, soon to join rome and austro-hungarian empire in the history books.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
pleasant news, if true. but i can't think of any significant precedent for a dominant power to simply declare bankruptcy. rulers generally reach for the sword, in history, on the 'we need money, they got it' principle.
there is a lot of fat, in the usa economy, and as long as nuclear war is averted, usa can prune expenses easily. even trump can see that--- who else wants to leave nato?
but most of the fat is in military expense, and pruning soldiers is dangerous, 'retiring' generals more so.
there is no excuse for usa military proliferation, except the transfer of taxes into share-holders pockets. share-holders are more dangerous than soldiers or generals so there's all kinds of danger in pruning fat in the usa.
a dilemma with 2 equally ugly horns. most likely outcome? biden gets in, usa goes to war. let's hope the only victim is venezuela.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
democracy is the english version of a greek phrase, 'demos kratia.' aristotle used it as a label for the greek city-states, notably athens, wherein the 'demos' [citizens] kratia' [ruled].
some usa states have it, notably california. it would be a flourishing democracy if independent, but it and others, is not. neither is the federation. using the word democracy in reference to usa or its individual states is a cynical dis-education of the people, who can not struggle to get democracy when they are told daily that they have it already. a notable example of thought control through newspeak.
worse still, usans learn to despise 'democracy' since the societies that 'have' it, are corrupt and plainly owned by the rich, both private and corporate.
it is more than 100 years since the actual progressive movement brought democracy to several usa states. what has happened to their grandchildren, that the ideal is never raised?.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
the sans culottes didn't have the web, you do. revolution is simple, and might be bloodless.
every monday morning, send the same email to the dnc: "i will not vote democratic until an effective and accessible power of citizen initiative is the first element of the democratic party platform."
tell your friends to do the same, and spread the word. when 1,000,000 people hit the dnc server the path to democracy will open. but, are there 1,000,000 americans who want to be citizens of a democracy? if there are not, abandon hope and quit public discussion.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
'the only way to save your democracy,' is a phrase which contains an idiocy, or a lie. you can't save what you don't have, and if you verbally impute 'democracy' to the usa, you are lying with cynical intent, or a victim of orwellian 'newspeak.' or, in the usa, you are doing what is necessary to feed yer kids. shameful, but necessary.
for those who came in late, democracy is rule by the people, not choosing which hyena runs the zoo. switzerland, or california, do it, and don't have to put up with crooks or incompetence, as they have the initiative power of law and action. study them, and ask why usa can not be a better place.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
the usa is not a democracy, not is any other nation, possibly excepting switzerland. consequently, there are no rights held by power of the electorate, only customs and privileges issued by the sovereign power. usa, and its uk lapdog, pulled the plug on assange's house arrest and will move him into worse quarters and worse treatment, because he is guilty. no judges involved in that judgement, unnecessary when you embarrass the secret police or army.
hard to feel sympathy for him. instead of hiding behind anonymity and passwords, he briefly enjoyed a life of celebrity and groupies. that latter was his destruction.
better than most he knew the character of the usg, and he enraged them. like those drunken fools who jump into the tiger cage at the zoo, there could be no happy ending to that activity. he gave whistleblowing a bad reputation. snowden showed how it can be done, and survive. [so far!]
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
trump is a liar, and would never have got near the wh, except that the professional politicians are even worse. this is not a contest between trump and biden, the whole nation is circling the drain, and whoever wins, usa loses.
hard to believe that there is no clear-sighted analysis of the usa situation, there are giant brains devising new 'playstation ' issues, and activity in the inflaton field just before the big bang, but no one connects the structure of the nation with current activity.
if you think biden is better, you just haven't been paying attention to his career. undistinguished, to be sure. a compliant tool of corporation rule, commonly referred to as fascism, and perfectly willing to invade any nation in search of new markets.
the government of the usa has shaped a populace of ignorant and passive consumer-units, the deep state appears to have shaped the political parties into byzantine support groups of chariot races, utterly unconnected with any effective national management, and purposeless outside to lusting for the perks of office.
what is the future of the usa? what good can come of this situation? except, please don't burn down the planet while you subside into the position once occupied by paraguay.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
if there are usans of taste and judgement, they should move to blue states, and secede.
big 'if,' tho' - the basic law of the nation was written by a slave plantation grandee whose explicit motivation was to extend the tolerance of slavery, and ensure the rule of wealth.
and yet, even today, usans generally are proud of that document, and regard the rule of wealth as a virtue. recent events in the texas gummint are typical of the usa character, and should surprise no one. censorship is the tool of evil, when it is conscious of itself. living in a nation where elected officials talk like this should be a matter of shame.
but usans read daily about the need to send 'special forces' to foreign lands, and drone bombers, to kill the people there. there is no sense of shame in usa.
did you know 'sonder kommando' meant 'special force? exquisitely appropriate.
3
-
3
-
3
-
usa has never been a democracy, and mr. hartmann should be ashamed of himself for suggesting otherwise. but he has to stir the pot to keep the money rolling in, poor lad.
california has democracy: administration is guided by referendum, and initiative occasionally supersedes public service direction. there is even recall of errant governors. california would be the most democratic nation in the world, if it were independent. only the swiss for competition, of course. but they are not independent.
the usa is an elective aristocracy, modeled on the britain of madison's time. he said britain was the best work of mankind in politics, strange you may think for a man who was leading the decision to break away. but the brits were gradually making slavery legally impossible, so madison needed a new nation. he made sure it was not a democracy, as he explained clearly to the constitutional convention. i don't know why usans talk about democracy, except they were notably public liars from the beginning. in any event, long before orwell's '1984' they polluted the english language with political lies. 'double-think' 'r us.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
the south did not attempt to overthrow the federal government, as everyone in the south with any military experience knew it was impossible. but the masters of the south were looking at ruin, as legislation making slavery untenable began appearing. the same thing happened earlier, prompting the war of independence.
that war was successful, and the grandees of the south may have thought lightning could strike again.
it was not necessary to overthrow the federal government, they merely had to leave, and make it too expensive to reclaim them. so they stirred up the the southun yobbos with cries of freedom! from yankee domination and threw the dice. they got 'snake-eyes' immediately, the brits were not so firmly tied to slave-grown cotton as to mix it with usa when indian cotton would do.
the french navy probably saved the recently colonial usa, british money did not appear for the confederates. no lightning for them.
people go to war sometimes out of desperation. germany and japan were both facing disaster from peace, so were driven to a war cool appraisal would label 'suicidal.'
the southern 'gentlemen' were in a similar situation, and made a similar choice.
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
in the end, european jews decided they wanted palestine, all of it, and began a slow invasion in the early 1900's. after ww1, it speeded up, with the assistance of the british mandate authority. by 1925, jewish paramilitary organizations ruled palestine at night, and britain began to be a damper on zionist plans, so they came under attack as well.
the zionists always wanted all, "from the river to the sea." they said they would take it, arab muslims were encouraged to leave.
there can be no peace in palestine until israel joins apartheid south africa in history.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
china is out-shining the whole world lately, and they were at india's level 100 years ago. it is tempting to ask, "what did they do, and can we do it too?"
this question should be asked, but the answer is "no." there is radical difference in the history of india and china, before and after that point of similar poverty.
but on the 'can't hurt' list, spending more money on education for all, and less for military posturing comes immediately to mind. but that is long-term investment, anathema to western politicians, and indian as well, unfortunately.
basically, india needs a mao ci dung. all you've got is modi. god help you.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
when all pretense of community spirit is gone, appeals to patriotism seen for self-interested propaganda, impending collapse appears likely and sauve qui peut is the order of the day.
and sure enough, a serious epidemic explodes into a generation marking event. don't blame trump, your troubles are spine deep and implanted at birth. it turns out that a nation founded to preserve slavery and the rule of wealth is not the incubator of justice and democracy.
what can be done now? difficult to say, since the only visible means for a people to transform their government is revolution. americans are not revolution material, being afflicted with the sicilian disease, of well-based suspicion and contempt for other demographics contending for dwindling resources of food and shelter.
trump is not naturally suited to management, but, like dubya, he has advisors and strokers. they will flood the nation with information about biden which will at least make this a close race, and if biden loses control, perhaps not even close.
but the good news is, trump is not that much worse than biden. the mechanics of usa two party oligarchy ensure that the republicans overtly favor wealth, democrats shadow them closely with a trivial 'social' sop to the left, and everyone is happy but the poor, who stay home.
sanders wanted to be president, a present to himself after a lifetime of swimming against the tide. he would have had more effect by running a socialist program and drawing off sufficient votes that the dems could never win. from that position he might have extracted significant social reform. as a 'second best democrat' he will be useless.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
the invasion of palestine began in the late 1800's, you could mark it with the publication of 'das judenrat in about 1897, and was initially just a trickle of humble jewish colonists, searching out palestinian land that was vacant, and paying good money for it. but when the brits took over control after ww1, the trickle became a river, pm balfour had promised jews a homeland in palestine. he was slippery, it was not a 'state,' but he got jewish support in ww1 and paid off. and the british let the jews in until about 1925, when the jewish militia split into its original 'self-defense' arm and a new organization which was publicly and frankly intent on taking all of palestine from the arab occupants. "from the river to the sea" was their motto. humble no more, they started shooting people who resisted them. even brits, who suggested that european invaders were not entitled to palestine. finally, the flood of european jewish refugees after ww2 plus the large amounts of guns and cash from mostly american jews allowed the jewish para-mitlitary groups to seize control of palestine. they were sanctified by the u.n. as it was then under the control of the usa, which saw a use for a client state near the oil fields. and, it turns out there were significant numbers of americans who believed that god would not gather them to heaven unless the jews were in control of jerusalem.
evidently, the americans still think israel is a good friend to have in the oil lands. or, it is simply numbers of jews, rich and poor, subsidizing israel as an insurance policy. either way, israel is a land of bandits, whatever the u. n. says. but they continue to survive, although prosperity is hard when you are in a perpetual state of war with most of your neighbors. this struggle is not decided, but the jews would be the favorites, 5-3 or similar.
and the anti-boycott laws? that's easy: there's votes in it, and not many many votes against it. if you haven't learned to despise politicians by the age of thirty- you are an orc.
2
-
2
-
usa is a plutocracy. unlike the other categories described by aristotle, it is informal. the formal state is an elective aristocracy. do not confuse this with democracy, voting does not make democracy. if the answer to the question: "who rules?" is "the citizens," then it is a democracy, and usa is not.
plutocrats rule through influence, exercised by money. the combination of state officials, politicians in power, and their rich masters make up the 'establishment'. it is not cohesive, but certain principles are evident, in protecting the essential bases of each of the three elements.
is this a conspiracy? no. it is a culture, broader, deeper but less well-defined. a conspiracy can be busted, if you have effective police power. a culture is there to stay, and will ultimately devour its parent society.
2
-
it's nice that you can laugh at your society. it's happened before, that voltaire guy was the preliminary tremor to a lot of francais losing their tempers, and others losing their heads. but i'm holding out for an action man, preferably not in uniform*. your political system is obsolete, it's putrescent , it's risible- and your hopes are only that one old man is gonna fix it!? he ain't. he can't, his track record is good, by usa standards, but wafer thin and confined to a tiny morsel of land utterly different from average usa.
fdr couldn't fix things, with much greater power than bernie will ever have. abandon hope, abandon ship if you can, or form up in smiling ranks with clean hair and sharp swords- meet the orcs like mensch.
*tulsi might become an action woman. she's angry, widely respected, should have high credit in the 'needed the job mercenary- don't enjoy dying or killing' ranks. could see her riding a weapon carrier into dc about 20 years from now, with a few divisions of infantry. no, 20 years from now it'll be 50,000 lazer-mounted drone dogs, hopefully under human control. either way. madison's powdered wig society has no future.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
trump isn't personally responsible for 2 million. the usa 'capitalist' society is. health care isn't a right, it's something you buy, if you can. epidemics highlight the weaknesses in this way of thinking, as mass death affects everyone, driver, masseuse and nanny all might die at once. your portfolio be disrupted by labor shortages. but it's not relevant, greed will go to any length, absorb any blow, to preserve the sanctity of wealth.
the weakness on what passes for the left in the usa lies in their complicity in the national myth that the rich are entitled to be rich. if you would just get angry, soon you would start to think they don't even need to eat. but nobody's even angry, never mind hungry too.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
because the president is commander in chief. usa only uses mercenaries, now, and doesn't declare war, just goes and shoots usually. congress supported iraq war, which shows that congress is just as crooked as trump.
if you want an administration that functions as a democracy, first you must get democracy. in fact, if you don't have it, first you must learn you don't have ir, second, you must think of a way to get it, and third, you must act.
the people of usa are simply not citizen quality, and fail all of these tests.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
you don't have right to anything, if you have no power of enforcement. and 'we, the people' are not masters of the nation.
get a new constitution, that begins, 'we, the citizens, rule our nation through referendum and initiative.'
and there's the weak point. since the people are raised to be passive and cynical watchers of their betters in government, they are not capable of common action. they can strike and demonstrate, but have no legal handle on the operation of society. usa is badly run, if the goal is common prosperity, but the goal is the enrichment of the elite.
so the people must arm themselves, and organize to overthrow the government. that is the purpose of the second amendment.
too hard? then continue whining. some people make a business of it, the ultimate expression of the usa ideal: politics is for money.
2
-
aristotle was a really smart guy. when he turned his attention to 'politics,' he found that the fundamental interest was, "who decides," seems simple now, but hellas at the time was chockful of contending new ideas.
so he had a wide variety of types of states to organize and analyze.
the best state in his conclusion, was what he called, "demos kratia." you would guess that's what we call 'democracy.
but you would be wrong. his democracy was a state, directed by the citizens, using referenda and initiative.
your 'democracy' is a state run by politicians. why would you use the same word for two different kinds of control?
because if you called modern 'democracy' by an accurate title, such as 'elective aristocracy', the people might be restive, while ennobling them with the title of 'citizen' helps keep them quiet.*
you can see the process done in modern history of great britain: when i was young, the people were subjects, now they are citizens, but they still have a queen. and they still are ruled by 'aristocrats' of politics and wealth. only the word changed, not the reality.
the gop is doing nothing new. what is new, is the education and economic place of the ordinary usan. it has decayed since the 1950's, and they are reverting to their role and position pre-war.
no hope for the usa, it is frozen in the embrace of plutocracy. the constitution is the iron wall of the ruling class, and looks like protecting them to the end of time.
or violent over-throw.
*orwell was all over this, with 'newspeak' and 'double-think.' although the sovs weren't as good at lying as usa.
2
-
since 1948, the usa has led a crusade against the prc, chiefly involving economic warfare through interdiction of trade. there was some shooting, in korea and vietnam, with mixed results. consequently, prc is not much inclined to co-operate in many international 'rules.' they are clear about usg intentions to dominate the world, and disagree. i can understand the chinese viewpoint. just look at trump and biden, and anyone can understand that the usg is decadent, and totally directed by secret figures. who have no interest in anything but their private power and wealth.
as for your trade surplus, don't accuse the chinese. look at your own politicians, and ask, "why have you allowed this?" they will answer, "we were bribed, and well-rewarded."
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
usa was born to preserve slavery, enable ethnic cleansing, and ensure the rule of the rich over the poor. the resulting culture reflects that beginning, although the lumpen couch potato might still protest they are better off than slaves. that culture has not changed, the people are ignorant and alienated, the democrats as crooked as the republicans. listen to biden saying 'nothing will change,' to the rich.
the grip of the rich on the levers of government may well be loosened, but that has happened before, without lasting consequence. indeed, the republican party once was more progressive than the democrats. a new party of the right is not in view, so the republicans are in no danger. in fact, their grip on most of the state governments is at a high point.
the only significant change possible is military rule, and usa is not quite there, yet. the army is bleeding the national budget, keeping the generals well fed, the troops employed without high casualties, so plutocracy seems stable. if trump manages to start a big war, a coup is more likely than civilized socialism.
2
-
you can govern a nation through democracy. but not a corporation. a corporation has a single purpose , to trade goods or service for money. it regards its share-holders as people, all others as prey.
democracy in the nation is necessary, for rule by elite is never just, and usually oppressive, a commercial enterprise can be and usually is, run to make a profit for the owners. co-ops are possible, and exist in the current 'capitalist' economy, but they do not flourish. they do not have access to capital, so can not grow quickly. they are therefore liable to be suffocated by the most competent organizations from the 'publicly owned' competition.
co-ops are not political organizations, they can never defend their members from the state. they can flourish in a democracy by nourishing citizenship in the people.
get democracy first, use initiative to shape the nation, probably into some kind of socialism.
2
-
2
-
2
-
what can be the agent of change, under the constitution of the usa? nothing, really, it was designed to achieve stasis, since it was written by rich men fearing change. that is why fdr achieved so little, much of which now long erased. usa did not recover from the great depression, it was bailed out by arms orders from europe.
but go on talking about personalities, usa is more concerned with celebrities than material reality because material reality is far out of reach.
no candidate can offer transformational change, you are being deluded, or at least, 'entertained,' by chat quite divorced from reality.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
you use what weapons you have, and the usg has been at war with everyone, for a long time. after ww2, their relative strength and wealth released all restraint, and formed the insensate attitude of imperial power.
but dysfunctional economy has brought usa back closer in power to a few other states, and they are getting a little nervous about their position in the world. so, sanctions, threats and strange alliances.
i think prc has achieved parity in strength, both military and economic. any shortfall is compensated by much better national management. so they will come to the leading position in international affairs, barring mass war and/or climate collapse.
will the usa destroy the world, in order to hold on to it? that would be irrational. but they are irrational.
the young must despise the old, to let things come to such a global crisis.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
mr hartmann makes a good living reporting the horrors of usa politics and culture. and yet, the numerous shootings each week seem apolitical, just common street violence. 'it just happens, ain't it a shame!'
but in fact, the second amendment provides the guns, that's politics, and a thriving business.
and the street crime is based on the constitution. it creates poverty, it creates a drug market, it empowers the rich to get richer, and the poor to emulate, in however feeble a manner they can.
but the rich don't notice, and they run the nation.
usans persist in referring their nation as a democracy, in the face of all evidence, and that level of double-think prevents any thought of change.
now they are concerned about baby formula. usa has a thousand problems, and talking about this one is sophisticated thought-control.
there is a potential nuclear war simmering in ukraine, and baby formula has seized your attention?
in fact, the puerility of usa politics is quite uniform, near omni-present.
the current and previous ceo's of usa are mental defectives. haven't you noticed? they were and are in charge of the largest nuclear arsenal in the world, doesn't bother you, at all?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
unfortunately, prof wolff never talks about political structure. perhaps it's too hard for you.
but economic questions depend on political structure. you can talk all you want about 'capitalism' and 'socialism' without achieving anything, because you, and he, are not members of the ruling group. at the end of your discussion, there is never an action statement, because you are not citizens of a democracy, you are civilians, in an oligarchy. watchers, only.
yet action is very much called for. immediate and substantial change in response to climate threat is necessary, to reduce the effects of global warming. but politicians will not act in time because the immediate rewards of doing nothing will always incline them to look away. it will be someone else's disaster, 'i'll be retired, rich and cocooned in money.'
and that is the use of democracy: rule by the people tends to be rule for the people. but you haven't got democracy, and no public figure suggests you better get it.
much the same could be said about every society, possibly excepting helvetia. which is why h. sap. is entering a population collapse period. extinction may result, but unlikely.
2
-
2
-
interesting to inject psychiatry into political discussion, but people do what they think will benefit them, trump most notably. trump said "pump me up and they did," i presume his doctors are selected for a compliant nature. i caught a clip of one of his doctors who on the basis of 10 words suggested to me that he missed his calling as a used car salesman. he was slick and shiny, and evasive.
so, did trumpy have a mild case and come out saying "don't worry about it!"
did trumpy have a serious case and come out saying "don't worry about it!" cuz the uppers work until he dies next week.
did trumpy have a fake case and come out saying "don't worry about it!" for sympathy and admiration.
the truth is in no politician anyway, and trumpy is genuinely unclear as to the meaning of the word.
in the end, words lose their value, and action must be taken from appearance. usans may imagine that their nation will be good as new, as soon as this temporary embarrassment is removed. but no. not even certain the next creature in the wh is better, even. politics in the usa is so degenerate that trump is the new normal.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
when you live in a democracy, you talk about what needs to be done, and how to do it- growing up in such a society forms citizen quality people. it is in the interests of the citizens that all be well-educated.
but the usa is not a democracy, at the federal level, and many, perhaps most of its people are not citizen quality. not a unique situation, as only switzerland is a democracy, close enough.
political discussion in an elective aristocracy is consequently inane- necessarily about people, little different from adolescent chat about sports stars.
and yet it is vitally important that the temporary lords and ladies serve the nation well. the disconnect between this necessity and the reality of depending on politicians to act on the public welfare, when history demonstrates endlessly that they do not, has brought more than half of the people to such contempt of the government as to simply not vote. at the same time, a nation blessed by geography and resources beyond all others is clearly rotting.
bernie is not the answer. but he may be a temporary reprieve, while deeper solutions are sought.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
the government of the usa is modeled on that of britain circa george 3rd. quite a bit has happened since then, but both are resolutely not democratic. uk seems to be more flexible, since the law is whatever the judges say it is, unless the parliament writes something contrary.
brexit, if they ever get it done, will be convenient for the usg. uk will have to drop the pretencs of independence from usa direction. disaster for the people of uk, whose future would be brighter in e. u. than usa lapdog. may not make any difference in medium term, rule by politicians generally means little to no response to the climate elephant in the room. and some governments are determined to promote fossil fuel use. take names, you children will want to hunt them down, and expose them to the power of the sun. naked, on an anthill.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
it's not enough, to say, "capitalism is bad."
prof wolff ignores the inconvenient reality that politics rules economics.
aristotle knew better, when he summarized society by asking: "who decides?"
if you want a society fair to all, you must create a society in which every voice is heard.
there is such a social structure, it's called 'democracy.'
until you get democracy, elites will rule, for their own benefit.
marx ignored this reality, too. it was in the 'too hard' basket.
but it's really not hard. if a people wants democracy, they can have it. numbers will win.
why then do elites rule? because priests, and retired academics, assure the people that things will get better without the need for gunfire.
no, they won't get better without gunfire. power is never given away, and people who will not fight will always be the cattle of those who can afford to hire bodyguards.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
in a two party system, one party must seek the pleasure of the wealthy, or another will be born to do so. in the usa, this party is the republican, and it chose this path at birth. the other party was never the party of the lowers, it was the party of wealth, also, but it was the party of landed wealth, the slave plantations. originally the democratic-republican party, it re-named itself after the civil war, and became the democratic party, the defender of southern whites. there was a period in the thirties, when pressure from genuine socialists pushed the democrats towards support of welfare measures, but it was never a socialist party, just an opportunist party with differing support groups. workers in the north, whites in the south.
which is why both parties have no ideals, and no goals but power. and the people who work in them are largely contemptible con-men initially, amoral sociopaths with age. no one who makes a career in either party retains a skerrick of ethics, nor any real grasp of reality outside the dc ring-road.
it is a waste of effort to discuss backing anyone from either party, they are all bidens, or worse.
if you want to improve your nation, plan revolution.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
inflation sounds like a good thing, if you have nothing, or maybe some land with a house on it. if you are renting, eventually not so good. but cash in hand today, tomorrow may not come.
what seems clear, is that some societies are remarkably fragile, held together by everyone doing as they are expected too, and knocked over by a disease of which 1 in a hundred has, of which 2 in a hundred die, and more than half of those on a pension, no loss, economically.
canada is at least trying to transition back to normality with minimum pain to its people, in obvious contrast to usa.
the wrong people are running canda, and worse people running usa. there is room for science in the design of political society. there are phd's who concern themselves with this matter, why are they silent?
2
-
2
-
you have to vote for someone, or stay home. it's not democracy, but elective oligarchy is better than plain old monarchy. so, syou are poiled for choice this time, for two reasons: 1-trump looks very beatable.* 2-democrat establishment reeks. losing to trump, by talking to goldman, sachs instead of visiting mid-west and offering programs is not going to be quickly forgotten.
new faces very much desired, plenty have applied. old faces, even bernie, much less loved.
buttigieg is smart, educated, ticked off all the boxes, and can form a good sentence, building a discourse worth listening to. a winning combination, you might think, but obama demonstrated that he could do all that, and accomplish very little. mayor pete needs to write a program, what to do, how to do it.
andrew yang is equally smart, and doesn't want to be a politician- he wants to do things, has thought out ideas on what and how. his only serious weakness is that he doesn't want to sneak into office on charm, he wants to be a referendum with a face and a verbal user's manual. voters should love that, but they never have seen it before and it may require too much thinking for the electorate. maybe he should be consigliere for mayor pete.
*andy yang doesn't need a party. he pulls votes from every direction. could run as an independent and put trump in power.again. yang and buttigieg should have a chat and make sure this doesn't happen.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
relax, muggles- those devious dnc slime balls have avoided the bernie trap again, biden is occupying the space, and the super delegates will retire him and insert warren in the nomination. add klobuchar as vp, roll over trump, then they dust off the fdr playbook, hire the unemployed to sweep the streets, and declare war on venezuela, iran, madagascar and paraguay. this diverts attention while they flee to new zealand with the only terminal that can access the u. s. treasury.
only joking, because treating politics seriously is a chump's game. somehow the world resembles medieval italy and i wasn't sent the memo.
what can you say, serious, when a stat chart acts like an ammeter with a shout circuit in the line. surely there will be large unit gun battles in every city, those absurdly militarized police units will suddenly be needed, and arson will be a popular hobby.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
the gop is in control of most state governments, has always been the party of wealth and will continue to be, and suggesting they are resembling the fascists and nazis does not make them irrelevant. the fact that a noxious creature like trump can seize control says more about the dem party than the reps.
the democratic party has no ideology, and was willing to pursue the rich for a share of power and wealth, and this will continue.
the people of the usa are political sheep, ill-educated and conditioned from birth to worship wealth. even 'progressives' accept this primary legitimacy of wealth, and offer no plan to institute democracy. without democracy, the political management will be the agent of wealth, unless the military decide to take control. there is no visible path to justice, so - sauve, qui peut!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
one can hope the cv19 experience will shake usa into some kind of sanity, but it would be a vain hope. usa is buried in its culture, constrained by its laws, and the limit of their hope is a kind master. seldom met, and competence doesn't enter into the question, as no competence can matter in a system designed to be changeless. until it crashes. this might be soon, many fragile points are visible, but what comes out of the crash might be equally vile.
trump might disgust you, but in fact he is the quintessential successful american businessman. bombastic, selfish, irresponsible, empty and fake. took him right to the top- america recognized what it loved.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
let's use basic english: the rich are greedy, politicians absolutely corrupt, and any talking head who ascribes 'democracy' to the usa is lazy-minded, at best.
the usa was created to preserve the rule of wealth, it's architect said as much, and incidentally to extend african slavery in usa for as long as possible. that legal framework remains the fundamental law of the land, and there is no rule 'by the people' in it.
lincoln lied, as you should expect - he was a politician.
the people of usa remain as ignorant and passive as their british forebears, the natural consequence of being held in permanent tutelage.
so, 'neo-liberalism' is the topic du jour? maybe you should review 'democracy,' first. once you know what democracy is, the existence of 'neo-liberalism' will confirm that you don't have democracy.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
no, he's not a serial killer. don't be silly- he's a dim-witted rich kid, grown old and resentful that he don't get no respect. as far as the thousands dying of the virus, not his fault. as far as the cities burning, not his fault. that's just usa society reacting to outside influences beyond anyone's control, and the tradition of american inhabitants setting fire to things they can't afford. just envy really. really not fair, here he is struggling, 3-4 days a week to get the 2nd term he's entitled to, and out of the blue, fire and plague.
you have the master you deserve folks. trump is the perfect american - fat, vain, dim and won the lottery of family. i'm amazed they don;t fave a family serial based on his life. you have the means to be citizens of a democracy, and you settle for pluto-america and its temporary kings.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2 trillion distributed by shovel from the back of trucks would have been more useful. but this is usa. give it to the rich.
if americans were francais, they'd be marching towards dc with chunks of rock in hand. as they are american, replace rocks with firearms- that's why you have them, you know. but as they are american, they scrabble off to job, 1, 2, or 3. while the chattering class wring their hands, for a living.. in that way you do resemble francais, about the time la belle marie said "if they hunger, let them come to back of the kitchen, for scraps of cake." she meant well, [not-so] poor lady, but a bit out of touch with reality.
i don't see revolution in use just yet. armed militia no longer can contend with regular army. unless the grunts are from the same dispossessed class. which is almost the case. hmmm...
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
what could bernie do, as president, so long as congress is the usual mix of right wing and farther right wing professional politicians? madison took a lot of trouble to explain to america that he despised democracy, and shaped his constitution to ensure the rich ruled. he was brilliantly successful- look around you, they still rule. not an accident.
the cure is to get democracy. but no one says so. the best you will hear is, 'put me in office and i will take care of you.' that hasn't worked out, yet. want to try it for another 200 tears? the elite does fear bernie, they fear he might stir up revolution. but he wouldn't. he just a man, useless by himself, and incapable of creating revolution in a nation of slaves. slaves can not be citizens, the limit of their aspiration is to find themselves serving a kind master.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
he may be a hero, but this is politics of the powerless.
the people of the usa could have democracy, without gunfire, if only a lot of them knew what democracy is, and wanted it.
and there is the problem, most don't know, not sure if most would want it.
why don't they know? ask school teachers. the teachers might well say, "we can't tell the truth, we'd lose our jobs."
why wouldn't they want to be members of the ruling class? because many, most? despise the other people in the nation. this is the legacy of slavery, and the determination of the rich that the many would not rule.
voting for which politician shall be your master is not democracy. citizens of democracy vote for which laws shall we have, what actions shall we take,
that doesn't happen in the usa, and until you get off your knees and make politicians extinct you will always be cattle.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
usa is an aggressor nation, they have been building an empire since the 'monroe doctrine,' and this tide has rolled up to ukraine. whatever language you use, putin is saying 'basta,' and 'not while i have an army and a bomb.'
he can't be hopeful, this is the '2nd carthage war' of our time, neither hitler nor especially tojo, could have been confident of success against the usa empire, but both fought on the principle of death better than submission.
unfortunately, our 'evil empire' is institutionally incapable of fear, and nuclear war will result.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
in my view, evil begins with napalming a village in vietnam, while the men were in the fields, leaving a target consisting of old, sick, women and children.
no one in the usa is entitled to call anyone else, 'evil.'
usa extends its empire nowadays, by buying puppet dictators, would-be kings, and gangs of neo-nazis. they call it 'bringing freedom.' well, they would say that, wouldn't they.
it worked in iran, and vietnam, for awhile. they put someone in power in afghanistan, although he couldn't get anything done away from kabul, probably in los angeles now.
usa is the evil empire, now, and nato is its european tool. but, good news! some of nato is waking up. can you imagine saudi talking to russia? and perhaps macron has had enough, too.
2
-
i'm one of them too. first visit in '89, for three years, still 'communist,' but under orders to start thinking for themselves. several visits since for periods of 3-6 months, and daily communication with friends there through 'wechat.' there has been a lot of change, most of it for the better. there was poverty in '89, and still is, but much less.
government corruption continues, but currently xi jinping finds it convenient to root out some of it.
china remains a human society, and will never be norway. but the usa is worse in many ways, with less excuse, and the vietnam war convinced me that their society, born to protect slavery, has not improved since. considering what south africa used to be, this is an area in which serpentza should be expert.
all human societies have injustices, and many are able to conceal those injustices under a veil of lies. we can only measure what is publicly visible, or in which we have personal experience. usa currently is sending 'special forces' to various countries, to do murder. at home, police shoot down brown people with neither cause nor retribution. on visible measures, usa is evil, china, not so much.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
everywhere you look, you see rot. the rich live in a different usa. their area of the nation is golden.
usa was designed to be run for and by the rich. james madison promoted his constitution with that precise promise, and you see, he delivered.
you want a better nation, you need a new constitution.
this will require effort, even courage. on visible evidence, the people of the usa do not have the character needed for constructive action. you will have to wait and see what the first general is offering.
there will be a general soon, the political caste is degenerate, think 'last days of the roman republic.'
trump, biden, pelosi? these are yer national leaders?
of course, when the rich and military join together, not clear how well the rich will maintain their position. stay tuned!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
what is this 'fair?' why should chia be 'fair' to capitalist nations, notably usa. that tried to strange it at birth? you don't like chinese rules, go back to blockading china. but you don't, because deng xiao ping offered cheap, hard-working labor, and american corporations swallowed it, hook, line and sinker. now they can't leave, because they are addicted to the high profits, and they control the government of the usa, which ignores small business and labor. there is no 'fair' in the usa, but you complain that china isn't fair.
2
-
usa has been 'over-reaching' since they crushed the iroquois, [incidentally enriching g. washington] but finally they are reaching the usual end of empire, stretched too far, enemies within and without the imperium, and a populace no longer dazzled by success, since the only success is buried in the dj report, munitions stocks.
trump's milestone is his utter unfitness for rule, popping up with no senator, governor, or general in his cv. america's caligula in a sense. his presence should impel america to write a new constitution, but no one does political philosophy in usa, or they are suitably retiring, as no one is listening to academics in obscure arts colleges.
he does not boost imperialism, a great many heretofore silent talking heads are musing that another president would be desirable, but trump shows the way usa is headed- decay and decline. it will continue until some barracks caesar imposes martial law plus food stamps.. i can see general gabbard in that role, about 10 years from now.
2
-
usa is chaotic, at the best of times. trump is simply characteristic, and very representative of a society without principle, self-respect or even survival instinct, since even the rich are killing their golden goose.
but no one looks at the big picture in public, because there is no point in it: only in democracy do the citizens take a hand in national management, and usa is no democracy, nor are its people citizens.
there is no reason to expect more from biden, and dubya is still walking around, a free man, as well as a mass murderer. but that could be said of most presidents.
chaos? nothing new, and worse to come.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
the chinese are human, and with wealth and power will come arrogance and exploitation. usa even more human, and farther advanced in iniquity. right now, it appears the chinese are using land routes supplemented with sea lanes, to neutralize america's naval power. not incidentally, they are bringing opportunities for trade and development to central asia, a new resource.
china has a much more effective political structure, and are carving out a presence in world trade through intelligent planning. usa has no answer, but militarism. if it doesn't come to war, this is china's century.
unless , of course, the environment collapses. this seems a bigger threat by far than an american military spasm. equal in likelihood, but much more catastrophic.
2
-
2
-
if you raise children in a political bubble, "my country, tis of thee, " then you can sell them on supporting the greedy. but it takes more than that to establish yer genuwine nazi government. hitler had an army of unemployed, frequently disfigured or crippled men who didn't realize they were beaten on the battlefield, and were easily convinced that they had been betrayed. american politicians are not of that caliber. most have never been shot at, much less fought a losing war.
with all his faults, trump has not yet started a war, and it will need pressure to make him do so. perhaps pompeo will prove to be his cheney, but i think both realize that is a field out of their experience. they are trash people at the top of the usa, scary because of their power, but not truly tough.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
tg. and every politician, wants to be in office- usually saying they want to 'fix' things. most are lying, about intention or capability.
that's because the existence of politicians is the main problem. in a democracy, there are only citizens, and public servants who carry out the commands of the electorate expressed through referendum and initiative. there are no politicians, in a democracy, and only in a democracy is the welfare of the people the primary concern of society.
but the usa is not a democracy, the people are only civilians, not citizens, and politicians work for themselves, out of necessity.
vote for tg if it makes you feel better, but it won't fix america, only the people can do that, and they don't have the power under current laws. revolution is necessary.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
'chaz' below mentions or at least implies, one of the virtues of voting with effect: it protects elites from being torn limb from limb.
the usa is an elective aristocracy, and a populace with a shred of community spirit would transmute it into democracy, at whatever cost. but elites have evolved a pacification measure, called 'election.' they go on being elites, the people go on being screwed, but nobody has to die. that has been good enough to keep the rich in control, and unthreatened. i do not understand why americans put up with this, consequently, when 'chaz' implies he'll vote with a gun i am not a believer.
my guess is, the american elite are unconcerned also. elites commonly do not detect threats, being insulated by police, armies and bodyguards.
but if the plutocrats with cia help can find a 'lone gunman' to kill jfk, among thousands of 'chazzes' there is likely to be one who ain't talking, just doing.
this is the dawning of the age of aquarius, much delayed.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
economics is not a profession, it's a lurk. the people who matter, in politics, only listen when it suits them so it's only fair that economists protect their personal well-being by saying what power wants to hear.
a long history here, expressing shock/horror is a rhetorical device, at best. just think of all the 'advisors' in history, who have whispered in the king's ear, "we're in a bit of difficulty here, o august master, but if we don't pay the soldiers, no telling what will happen. but! i have an idea! we'll put some more copper in the denarius and presto! we can pay the soldiers, and then you can have that expensive concubine, too.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
no, he's just a scavenger who noticed a rotting carcass of plutocratic republic. the 'good guys,' democratic politicians, were crooked, corrupt and entitled, and even a trump could beat them. once in power, he has frequently demonstrated tha usa is no kind of democracy because he is not a professional politician and has no allegiance to the myths the pro-polllies use to justify their power.
the usa is, and always has been, an elective oligarchy. never a democracy of any kind, except the 'double-think' kind, the mystify the chumps kind.
if you want a better society, you have to fight for it, but first you have to admit you have been living in a lie.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
it's plutocracy on parade, maybe. the important point is that a state designed to be ruled by the rich through political surrogates has continued from birth to be exactly that. democracy was never an option for the usa. yet some americans, notably in california, did demand and get real democracy: referendum, initiative and recall, all in action, regularly or as needed. so the reality is, some americans saw the need for democracy, yet no one ever extends the idea to the federal sphere. surprising, since california is the economic and intellectual engine room of the usa. if they seceded, they would be the 5th largest economy in the world, i have read. i suppose they fear invasion from bubbaland if they did, all the soldiers come from there.
democracy is not ending, it never began. the myth was created to keep the chumps quiet. it worked well while looting the usa natural resources, but there's an end to that in sight.
2
-
i'm not afraid of xjp. he is sane and competent, from what i can see. and china is advancing daily in wealth and power. he has no reason to rip up the world.
biden is senile, was never very competent, and is merely the front man for the rulers of usa empire. presumably chosen because faction leaders could not tolerate the rule of any one from that group.
biden is a danger, every time he opens his mouth. he may deviate from script at any moment.
what china is going to do is increase pressure on taiwan commerce, constrict foreign relations, and aim to occupy in 5 years time. by then, usa will be weaker, taiwan people more inclined to re-join china.
usa will use every means to hold on to empire, short of war. but they will threaten war, for lack of attractive policies. this creates a tight-rope for xjp and several others - putin has grasped the nettle of real war, and has demonstrated that usa only will fight with money. and the money is increasingly without value.
the situation is complex, but i guess prc will prevail, in some sense, because underneath the guns and lies, usa has nothing to offer anymore. prc is fresh and vigorous, building infrastructure and commerce. they are the future, so long as usa doesn't blow-up the world.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
we have figured out that the usa is evil. harry truman came right out and said: "the cia is nothing but a bunch of thugs." and later he retracted, presumably because the cia threatened his family. but what to do about evil, in general, and the great satan in particular. have to do something, the baddies are destroying the planet.
how about this: when your doctor says only a few weeks left, go to the white house and immolate yourself as close as you can get.
not appealing, is it. not useful, either. maybe take flying lessons, light plane, bomb, yer own private 9/11. but yer afraid of heights?
and it didn't do al-quaida much good.
democracy is the answer, the lack of citizen quality people is the problem. the baddies are gonna win.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
there is a civil war going on in the usa, and words are bullets, not information. the sociopath in the wh has released the orcs from the need for silence. as in every pyramidal society [ the usa is a pyramid of money ] , shooting from the top is most effective. the hobbits have no effective counter, for they are not only constrained by humane habits, they are likely to be a minority group in usa population. it is truly orcland, where assassination, raids and invasions are common occurrences with only trivial gestures of justification, done from the remainder of habit. and notably, the 'hated ' nations just happen to be great producers of oil.
i don't despise the masters of the usa, hyenas will be hyenas, but the americans who support the hyenas while promoting christian values and democracy are truly worthy of contempt.
this is not a new war, it began with the establishment of the constitution, written to protect slavery and empower wealth over the mob. it's not even the first time the orc-nature of the nation's masters was revealed, the clearing of the native inhabitants was accompanied by frank statements of murderous intent, and contempt for the weak.
so today;s usa is not a creation of trump, rather the reverse. trump is what the usa has always been, and expressing horror reveals great naivety.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Autocratic direction of a nation gets brilliant results, so long as the autocrat agency is competent, and directed towards the welfare of the nation.
PRC has had such direction for the last 30 years, by comparison, with few missteps.
It won't last, qcpprc is composed of humans, and so is the rest of China. No matter, right now they reveal the selfishness and corruption everywhere seen in western elective oligarchies has results that cry out for revolution.
Prof Wolff paints a clear picture but I am not convinced it is any use. H. Sap. Needs revolution, a transfer of power from politician to electorate. And you don't hear that here or anywhere.
It may be that h. Sap. Is incapable of democracy, and equally, that any elite rule is leading us to extinction. We just aren't smart enough, or are too selfish, more likely.
Politics is the exercise of power within a society - Aristotle captured the core very simply, it is about 'who decides.' Mao came to the same conclusion, in more earthy fashion, he listened to academics and approved of Marx, but 'power grows from the barrel of a gun.' if you are just going to talk, be prepared for failure.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
people who won't fight or can't fight will be the slaves of those who can and will fight. it is no accident that the citizens of athens were the army. used to be true of switzerland too.
usans can talk, for now, but since they can not organize they can never take power away from the rich, who own the politicians, who direct the police..
so go on talking, while you can, but you are still political cattle.
don't imagine for a minute that trump is your problem--- the system that selected him to be your king-for-awhile is your problem, and deeper still is the acceptance that you don't need democracy, it's too much trouble. deeper still is the quaint idea that what you have is democracy. frankly, a nation of idiots only prospered because of geographic isolation, no longer true in a global age.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
if you start with democracy, you can have as much socialism as you want. that's why madison wrote and sold a constitution that prevented democracy.
but no american politician dares to say "we are are not a democracy, the people do not rule." it would lead to him being unemployed.
and americans are too ignorant, anyway: you need citizen quality people to run a democracy, and bubbaland has very few. california would be a democracy, if independent, and a few other states as well. they should secede and let bubbas look after themselves. unfortunately, bubbas are over-represented in the army, and secession might not work. it's a puzzlement!
bernie is a politician, not a philosopher. so he says 'we need cheap drugs!' he doesn't say 'we need democracy, and cheap drugs will result, and many other good things.'
but you can't have cheap drugs in the usa. it's not a democracy.
2
-
2
-
2
-
the real lesson appears to be that americans are ill-educated and fearful always, of losing their employment. this was the implied intent, when the constitution was written, to empower the rich. the cure is establishing democracy, but it is out of reach of the frightened dimwits that plutocracy has cultivated in its national garden.
worse still, the superficially aware talking heads have still not made the connection between the lack of democracy and the character of the people. no use telling fearful dimwits to stand up and take part in the direction of the nation. which is why lenin did stand up and say, 'can't wait for the potato heads to become philosophers, let's get started now.'
there's been a few 'lenins' since then, with mixed results. mao would have to grit his teeth at the spectacle of state-directed capitalism in china, but he could console himself with the prospect of china as a world power, once again.
revolution is a bloody business, at best. but the spectre of looming climate catastrophe demands a change of direction from human society. politicians are incapable of adequate response.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
"lest we forget..." usa greeted the accession of the communist party to power in china, with a ring of trade barriers, and military threats including overflights by the taiwanese client state. china owes the west nothing. the walls were removed only by the erosion of naked greed from american corporations, seeing china as an inexhaustible cheap labor base, with potential as a giant market. so those american corporations pressed nixon to sell out the american worker, which he did, to accolades all around. well, except from the industrial workers, but no one else in america cared about them.
china has no respect for america, and can explain in detail why no one should do, including a lot of americans, once were workers, now are beggars. it appears china will soon be the leading human society, once again. get used to it, tell yer children to learn mandarin, it's much easier than english and will soon be the international language of choice.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
i get very tired about hearing 'liberal democracy.' whenever .democracy is modified, it ceases to be democracy. western nations are elective oligarchies. they are not democracies. the people have little influence on state activities, and no, not any, formal control.
when polls are taken, popular opinion is commonly against state activity.
so, when westerners say, china is an oligarchy, i agree, but i add, that so is the west.
i prefer democracy. but there is almost none. if you must tolerate oligarchy, china has been doing more for its people, by far.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
usa is in the fortunate position of only needing war for an income. the brits burned washington, but no one since has had the will and means to threaten existence. the department of defense is an arm of the wealth distribution system of the usa. so talk about violence is frequently unconnected with what is commonly called, 'reality.' even the occasional act of terrorism is only an inducement to transfer more money to share-holders in munitions corporations.
usa is defended by geography better than any other nation in the world. yet usa spends more on munitions than the next 7-10 nations, put together. this might be psychosis. but in fact, it's just a kind of commonplace mixture of corruption and arrogance. usans don't fear war, believing they are so strong that no one can hurt them.
and this is true. prc and russia could do great damage, but can not contemplate a 'victory.' and contrariwise - either are strong enough that attack would lead to catastrophic loss. they achieve this safety with much less expense, which is why prc will soon be the leading economic power in the world.
usa was built to protect the position and power of the rich. uk was the model, with some minor adjustments, wealth substituting for family lineage. both suffer from the unwillingness of the rich to subsidize the education of the unrich, which inevitably leads to national weakness.
prc has weaknesses built in too, but the nation is so large that more smart people will engage in science, engineering and commerce than anywhere else. for now, make sure that your child has a second language and it probably should be mandarin..
2
-
2
-
prof. wolff confuses economics with politics. he wants a different kind of society, very sensible, but is presumably unwilling to shoot anyone to achieve it. but the transfer of power requires violence, does it not? that's politics. to be fair, it is conceivable that a popular movement might confront a government with such numbers that some concessions were made. something like that happened in athens, a long, long time ago. democracy was born from threats of violence, and great numbers then. didn't last. recent athenians, notably varoufarkis, left town or submitted to the e. u. bankers. pericles, they ain't.
he seems enamored of syndicalism, which is no way to run a nation. it may be a good way to run a corporation, germans like it nowadays. but it hasn't caught on elsewhere. besides the struggle between labor and management has little to do with the management of a nation. nations decide war and peace, and shall we feed old old ladies who never joined a union. for me, it's democracy in the nation, and all else follows.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
'populism' is the appeal to the people in a society that is not a democracy. in a democracy, the wishes of the electorate have direct and decisive effect, through referendum and initiative. but there are no democracies aside from switzerland. at best there is some variety of elective oligarchy. in those societies, it suits some of the contending elites to stir up the people with promises as rewards for electoral support. this is regarded as undignified by the other parties, as it might instill some aspiration to real citizenship, in a democracy. these other parties respond with their own lies, regarding national virtue, offering a sense of participation as a spear-carrier in a virtual army.
democracy is the only hope for racial survival, as elite rule is always greedy and short-sighted. but it does not occur naturally, so economic ruin is visibly on-coming, and might be preferable to environmental collapse, which has a genuine possibility of extinction.
if you continue to depend on the virtue of your masters, you deserve what they give you, however little. if you get off your knees and start running society for the benefit of all, you might save the world. could be an easy choice, i would think.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
in the first place, it wasn't the people that established the constitution. that was the first lie. the federation was created by the consent of the various state congresses, largely controlled by the state grandees, unsurprising since you had to be white, male and prosperous to even vote. one state did offer the proposed constitution through referendum to the people. the rhode island people rejected the constitution. their finest hour.
during the constitutional convention, madison had to be frank in selling his document, and took credit for considering democracy, and rejecting it, because it would lead to the taxes on the rich being spent on the needs of of the poor.
there is no socialism, no democracy, in the foundation of the usa. and damn little since then.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
cya, we called it, when you do something that might terminate your career if it became public. saying 'rare, or never' seems unlikely, since usa military regularly engages in war crime. but some generals oppose politicians, retiring as required, and some see no problem, and some 'cya.' not sure how much cya does for you, but if you are not ready to retire, can't hurt.
the usg is a cess-pool, and there is no possible clean-up. a common situation in human societies, that's why history can be interesting.
there is one possible clean-up: people of usa could decide to take charge of their nation by establishing democracy. that would do it. but it needs citizen quality people, and i have been holding up my lamp and peering into faces, just to ask, what should we do? for 55 years with not a single suggestion of democracy. h. sap. relies on alpha personalities. always has done, and it's going to kill us. bernie is not the first 'savior,' many thought obama was the savior, and plenty more in modern times, none come off with great credit.
so not really a possible clean-up, just a charming fantasy.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
there is nothing new about greed, and institutionalizing it doesn't make it better. but does make it stronger.
being a citizen of a democracy has responsibilities, and benefits. the responsibilities arise from participation in the management of the nation, the benefits are necessary, to insure that the nation's managers all have reason to believe in the prosperity of the nation, and its people.
but usa is not a democracy, the people do not rule, so they must scrabble for survival as their masters allow. you would think they would get tired of it.
but, so long as 50% are ok, revolution is unlikely to succeed.
are 50% ok, and which direction is the trend line?
no matter, nothing will be done until the situation is much worse. then some general will seize power and throw coins to the poor.
roll on, military salvation!
btw, economists can tell you why, but they can't tell you how.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
almost daily, i watch mr hartmann scratch his head and wonder why 'american democracy' doesn't work for most americans. truly, it is visible psychosis.
the distinguishing feature of democracy is that it does work for most citizens, by force. the citizens vote, in referendum, occasionally initiative, majority rules. that's called democracy.
'american democracy' is a variety of psychosis. it has literally nothing in common with actual democracy. it has neither referendum, much less, does it have initiative.
what is the cure for this disease? reality. this is not a pleasant medicine. reality may simply be death. refusal to acknowledge reality will certainly be death. but no public figure says, "we don't have democracy, and we must get it."
so what will be the future of usa? various possibilities, but the the favorite must be dictatorship.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
why talk about things you have no control over? because you wish they were different? until you are a member of the ruling class, you are cattle.
or just adolescents dreaming [operative word ] about what they will do when grown up.
actual political grown ups want to be members of the ruling class, and when that class is most of the adults, it's called democracy. in short, first you get the power to do, then you consider the list of what should be done. pretty obvious, i suggest. why then do pundits never talk about this? because it's too hard. worse, when you talk for a living, you run out of things to say.
capitalism is not a political entity. it's just a label put om greed and arrogance, that wishes there was no such thing as politics, that money bought everything the rich need, and is utterly unconcerned about people without disposable income.
the political question is always, "who rules?" one, ten, a thousand? grouped as 'oligarchy." or most of the adults, 'democracy.' capitalism is no part of this fundamental question, for greed and arrogance permeates all human society in some degree.
the constitution of the usa was written to preserve slavery and empower the rule of wealth. it expressly confined power to political aristocrats numbered in the hundreds, which in a nation of millions is oligarchy. the selection of these aristocrats is done by election, replacing civil war, but has nothing to do with democracy. citizens of democracy vote in referendum and initiative, elections unnecessary.
so: saying 'health care should be free.' is a nonsense. it is the language of children. first become a citizen, a political grown up in a democracy.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
machon does not make a logical case. snowden is half pregnant in his claim to release him from his oath. he is not absolutely against surveillance, just against certain areas of surveillance. my respect for him is limited, because he is motivated not by his duty of defense as a citizen, but because it over-stepped his personal taste. nonetheless, some people might decide he has done society a good deed, however flawed.
making claim that he has defended democracy fails, however, because the usa is not a democracy. the people are not sovereign. he was working for the government, and betrayed them. he will go to jail, if caught.
a claim by a brit to respect his defense of democracy is simply laughable. uk remains a nominal monarchy, a real elective oligarchy , better a real elective aristocracy due to its heritage. in reality, the government of the usa is less progressive in some respects, as the constitution froze the nation in a constitution modeled on the britain of george 3rd.
whistleblowers are seldom without flaws, being human, and out of step with the world around them. until they live within a democracy, not in view, they must be masochists who will be punished by their elite masters, and can not be protected by the people they purport to serve. worse, those people commonly turn on the whisleblower for exposing the quality of the ruler to be a shame to all who submit.
2
-
2
-
2
-
the tendency of rich and powerful people to conspire to ensure they stay that way at the expense of the chumps is a natural consequence of evolution. it's called fascism, but it is 'amercanism' and many other names, for each language.
the chumps can not resist effectively for lack of education, and free time. poverty concentrates the mind on local concerns.
que sera, sera. but unfortunately, elite rule is fundamentally selfish and uninterested in public good, which is leading us towards environment collapse, perhaps even extinction.
homer sap 'solves' this condition by enlisting poor people into protective armies for the rich. money buys laws for awhile, buys gunmen when laws fail. the process has been visible in usa, with the 'professionalization' of the military, creating an instrument of imperial aggression immediately, and a potential instrument of national control. this process is visible also in the 'militarization' of police forces.
unhappy with this evolutionary course?
then you must act.
but first, you must imagine a different path for the nation, and a means of achieving the goal.
no voices, no ideas, no visible rejection of the status quo, in the usa. so yer screwed.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
everyone is just making a living, in the usa. it's not just plutocracy, it's plutalotry*. in any event, colbert does what he does, for money. so does mr dore. so do we all, to some degree. why despise colbert?
i was never captivated by barry. when he was running for president, it was clear his words were empty, just another politician- slick willy in brownface. but a charming man, like slick willy, and if you must be ruled by lies and smiles, better than dubya or biden.
* i made this up, perhaps, but there is a clear need for such a word.
2
-
i'm afraid you are wrong. militias don't beat armies. but a society that uses a militia rather than a professional army can avoid the burden of expense, and put the money to more productive uses.
the militias didn't beat the professional armies, the societies that relied on them outlasted their attackers.
even the nva didn't beat the usa in the field, but they did demonstrate that victory in the field did not necessarily mean victory in the war. essentially, militias tire out professional armies, discourage invading governments, and exhaust their taxes. the viet minh and viet cong never won battles, but, with the nva, they did outlast french and usa. even more so in afghanistan. the special forces could go anywhere, kill any resistance, but usa had no reason to occupy afghanistan so the taliban could always recover and continue their 'hopeless' resistance.
the real power of militia is not their efficiency, which is variable. but the winning power of militia is in being too much trouble to beat, for small reward. the real weakness of militia is the kill ratio: it is hard to maintain courage if the enemy is killing 10 for every 1 you get.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
folks, the solution is simple. maybe too hard for you, but simple:
organize [would-be] citizen action groups, easy with facebook and youtube.
each member sends a email to the dnc every monday morning.
it reads, " i'll vote democrat next, when democratic party is the party of democracy. i demand citizen initiative, administration through referendum, power of recall, and immediate publication of all administration activity. "
if enough people join the 'monday morning email ' activity, the democratic party will submit, or be extinct.
if there are not enough [would be] citizens, you are faced with a bleak reality. at least you will have stood up.
better to die on your feet than beg on your knees, don't you think?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
it's mueller's job to gather facts and report them to congress. he is not judge or jury. barr short-circuited this process, which is presumably why he was given this position.
the american political system was corrupt from birth, and hasn't improved. it was designed to be a plutocracy, the design was successful, and like any oligarchy, lies and secrets are the binding elements of that success, a formula for corruption. currently, the political caste is hopelessly incompetent due to 70 years of small wars run for profit without oversight. they handed foreign policy to the executive, and trump is the result. not the worst, dubya killed more and spent more, lbj is the worst, in those areas.
the usa constitution was a contemptible document while the ink was wet. imperial america is the result. trump is just a symptom, a pimple betraying moral syphilis.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
usa was never a democracy, it was, and is, an elective oligarchy. always has been, madison explained all this during the constitutional convention. he was explicit about preventing democracy from happening, and that's why, 230 years later, you ain't got it, you never had it.
you can go on kidding yourself, that voting for politicians is 'democracy,' but why would you want to, do you enjoy being screwed by the rich and their politician servants?
lately, the myth has become threadbare, and the contention for power is revealed to be naked oligarchy, without pretense off rule, or shadow-play of public participation.
your embarrassment lies in accepting the myth that you have it. you don't deserve democracy, it needs citizen-quality people. once you submit to the pretense, there can be no effective resistance to the oligarchy, you have legitimized it.
politics is exercise of power within a state. you can not be a citizen of a democracy if you are not willing to fight for that power. until you you get management by referendum and rule by initiative, you do not have democracy. if you won't fight, you never will.
2
-
no. inside that fat slug is a dim-witted rich boy who is terrified the world will not only find out just how ineffectual he is, but start laughing when his name is mentioned. in private life, you could feel sorry for him, but his failures in commerce drove him to try the world of politics. he had early success there, 'dumb' is evidently no bar to election in usa, but he is beginning to realize that boasting, bullying and lying will only get you into politics, not keep you there.
the political system of the usa is hopelessly ineffective, buffoons and charlatans alternate in office with great frequency, and that is why the slide down the ladder is continuing and will result in collapse. unfortunately, the political system is rigid and can not be changed from within. rebellions and military coups are usa's future.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
nato is a military organization created to 'defend' europe from ussr. why does it still exist? on evidence to date, it is the european extention of usa imperialism.
putin certainly thinks so, and the recent declaration that this military organization demands the right to go anywhere, has strengthened his resolve to say, 'not here.'
usa war crime in iraq and afghanistan are well-documented, and anyone who imagines that the weak are safe from usa invasion has simply not been paying attention.
usa is doing its best to use stooges in recent aggression, perhaps the military budget is over-stressing usa economic capacity. poland is resisting the usa 'invitation' to start a war with russia, i hope other stooges are as clear-sighted.
what is clear, is usa attempt to expand its economic dominion, 'on the cheap,' with other peoples money, and blood.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
corruption in government is of trivial importance, climate crisis might end human civilization. corruption in government is endemic, and not confined to the trump administration, or even the republican party. corruption is what happens when humans have power to steal from the nation's treasury. and that is built in. only democracy must be conducted in public, so that the masters of the nation can manage public affairs. the usa is not a democracy, and when a few hundred elite politicians can work in silence, out of sight, corruption is inevitable and has been reported from every administration. trump's administration might not be the worst, not yet at least.
the climate crisis, on the contrary, is a new phenomenon as a global threat of cataclysm. comparing it to the danger of corruption is absurd.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
china became powerful-
by feeding its people, better than ever before.
by providing some health care for everyone, and good health care for most
by educating all its people, and offering the best minds access to good universities
and all in spite of interdiction by the west, led by usa.
there were serious mis-steps along the way.
the great leap forward was a mistake. it was inspired by the threats of nuclear bombing made by the usa. suddenly, technology was the only defense, and mao lunged at it. he had reason, but simply over-whelmed the capacity of china to change. famine resulted, prc says 8 million starved.
the cultural revolution was a mistake. the damage done was serious, and indefensible, since it was just palace coups riding on social upheaval.
china became powerful by exploiting the greed of the capitalists, who were unconcerned at the suffering of the people whose employment they sent to china. on present performance prc will surpass usa by every measure soon, except military aggression.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
reagan was dim when he entered office, and got worse as he went, with alzheimers. if commonplace is mediocre, usa education has made a nation of dimbulbs.
but obama was bright enough, a giant in that crowd, and what did he achieve? the system was designed for stasis, and has been successful in that goal. when you don't want change, trump, biden, reagan and obama, are interchangeable.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
people keep saying trump supporters are gullible, but they see something you don't: the democrats don't bother to visit the rust belt, too busy chatting with wall street. betting on trump made good sense.
so he's dim, crooked and just as incapable as dubya, but the rust belt got worse under obama, and clinton was never going to help them. which means trump is better than the democrats, at least he is reminding democrats that they once had support from the rust belt, and now they don't. america will never recover from its history, until it tears up its constitution and establishes democracy. i estimate hell will freeze over first, that's life, species live and die, and societies likewise.
2
-
aristotle had his off-days, notably when he told the world women had one less rib. he was a married man, had a daughter, you might expect he could count ribs before speaking.
but he often was smart, and one of his best things was, the important thing about political systems is "who decides?"
when the ordinary people decide, that society is called a 'democracy.'
usa is not a democracy.
all of usa problems arise from the lack of democracy.
in the usa, politicians decide. they generally decide in favor of rich people. if you are a rich politician, naturally you decide in favor of the rich. better still, once you are a politician, soon you will be rich.
usa has an elite ruling class. they enjoy being rich and powerful. they won't give it up. and you can't change this by ennobling another politician. they are corrupted by ever-present opportunity.
it needs change from outside, commonly called 'revolution.'
2
-
one of the good things about democracy, is that public activity must be done in public, through referendum, so that the citizens can give/withhold assent, or issue a veto with initiative. result is honesty and sanity tend to characterize decisions. it's hard to be crooked or stupid when you are watched.
'democracy' is constantly heard in the west, but never seen. the word has been gutted, because of the necessity of using the word while doing theft or murder. nowadays it just means, 'we have elections!' which have zero effect on gov activity.
there is very little actual democracy among nation states, the swiss used to come close, but i suspect the embrace of the e. u. is proving to be irresistible. the rest of you zombies don't even come close.
nato politicians are politicians. they do what profits their career. for many, it's 'shoulder-to- shoulder' with equally corrupt and much more powerful usa politicians. those that are 'out-of-step' are equally corrupt, but happen to see more power/money in resistance.
you would think all of humanity, minus politicians and plutocrats, would stand up and demand democracy. it is currently necessary, not merely desirable. politicians are driving humanity off a climate cliff.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
we are dealing with human beings here, so i don't expect perfection, or even justice. i am so very aware of the imperfections in the usa, that i merely content myself by noting that china has lifted more people into a middle class than the entire population of usa. they have filthy air, but recognize it, and are making great efforts to clean it. they put more solar screens in operation every year than the total number usa has, a nation, incidentally that decries climate warming and promotes fossil fuel use. where usa runs new gas and oil pipelines across national parks, china recovers land from desertification.
perhaps most impressive is the ' one belt- one road' plan: bigger by far than the marshall plan, it will offer transport through out asia and europe cheaper than air, faster than sea travel. it is likely that widespread prosperity will appear wher it has never been before.
whatever else you ascribe to xi jinping, i suggest that you should describe him as a man intent on lifting his nation to the front rank of human society, and doing it with trade, not violence. compared to 'leaders' in the west, he is what the best of us should aim for, they are only what we have been led to endure.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
we are not one people. we may strive to live with orcs in human skin, but do not ascribe humanity to them.
i am a graduate of the vietnam war. i was fortunate not to participate in the actual mass murder of thousands of peasant farmers, but i was engaged in support of those who did, and worked for those who gave the orders.
so i am no longer a citizen of usa, my best decision.
the invasion of ukraine is hard to support. but it seems clear to me, that usg owns the current government of ukraine, have done since 2015, and opposing the plans of usg is never wrong, entirely, and usually a very good idea.
oliver stone is limited in what he can do, living in and working with usa people. but generally on the side of the angels. but he can't make much impression on a nation whose schools and media propagate myth and simple lies.
'better to light one candle...' but i wish more could be done.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
hypocrisy is only important in a master. but they don't need to lie, and may be frank in explaining what they do.
a 'leader' must lie, for telling the truth puts him out of business. if you expect truth from politicians, never buy a second hand car on the salesman's recommendation.
complaining about lies from politicians is merely a childish device to avoid seeing the source of the problem. tolerating politicians is childish. adults run their nation as citizens, through referendum and initiative. people who are afraid to be responsible citizens pass the decision power to politicians, and then complain about the result.
usa is filled with people who see the natural result of handing over the keys of the nation, to a group of people who have never demonstrated any saintly qualities, at all. nor even much competence at anything, aside from lying. that's because politician rule is shoddy always, corrupt usually, dangerous frequently. you might imagine someone would say "no clothes!"
but there are no people at all who say, 'together, we can run the nation better.' so, yes, usa is hopeless. and it's your fault. democracy needs citizen quality people. oligarchy just needs cattle.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
at what point are you going to realize that the lack of democracy is dangerous to your health? on present evidence, not yet. but it may simply be cowardice. organizing a revolution is usually dangerous too, and it may be sensible to wait for someone else to do it. that was the chinese view, they waited for someone else to do it, and eventually the ccp stepped up. the result is modern china--- clearly the wait paid off, right? i believe it did, for now, but the new mandarins will soon be like the old mandarins.
being human is a series of unpleasant choices, which is why we are bespoiling our planet and inviting extinction. young people should be giving serious thought to these matters, for their lifetime will be decisive not just for personal well-being, but also for the species. democracy is the only tool that can accommodate change and sustainable, long-term, planning. without it, society is a plaything for a few individuals who will never suffer for their self-centered indulgence.
2
-
2
-
2
-
not failure, not broken. the system works very much as james madison intended, and promised, if his proposed constitution was enacted.
it's a shame this matter is not investigated in school, but not surprising, i hope.
always charming, to see the light of reason lifting its cute little mushroom head out of the muck of reality.
but don't get yer hopes up: between dumbosity and sociopathy there is little scope for productive chit-chat, and none at all for real progress.
it might happen, there is a random element in human history, but impending climate 'change' will knock us back to hunter-gatherers, if not extinction.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
what a silly question! rhetorical, no doubt.
usa is an evil pustule on the face of humanity. it may be genetic, but more likely transmitted by education of the young in the path of evil. the death of useless people is of no concern to the uber-race.
usa was born that way, and it turns out, evil prospers, when society is designed by evil.
glad to hear the people of prc are surpassing usa in another area. usa is throwing every resource at them, and the outcome of this struggle is not clear yet. so long as the contest is commercial, we may hope prc will win.
but they are threatening war, and god knows [and korea, vietnam, iraq and afghanistan, etc.] they are not visibly inhibited by the prospect of bringing death and destruction to any obstinate nation. usa and prc are going to play russian roulette over taiwan. i hope usa blinks, or i may not be far enough away from the fall-out.
2
-
2
-
if you know the game is crooked, and you enter, it's not crooked anymore- yer butting in where you are not wanted.
bernie should have run as an independent, somewhat like gabbard. but bernie wants to win, rather than establish a brand. he has a brand, but it doesn't lead to the oval office. rather like a virtuous maiden who decides she would prefer to be rich, so walks in to a brothel and suggests she should be manager.
listen up, yanks! yer living in a plutocracy, it's crooked, it's brutal, and it murders at every level from assassination to warcrime. if you think it's strange that bernie isn't loved by all, you didn't do yer homework. incidentally, bernie wanting to be chief thug seems a bit strange. he should have been plotting revolution all these years.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
islam is narrow-minded. "there is no god but god, and mohammed is his prophet" was a very inspiring war-cry, carried them a long way. in modern times, various terrorist groups rely on fundamental islam to unite and inspire action against great odds.
so, it's right to be phobic.
still, have to live with them, even if everyone keeps one hand on the .45.
the basic problem is the need of many people to have a religion, and as none have any scientific base, each must be supported by irrational aggression.
the cure is simple, but apparently impossible. it's just homo sap. species' limitation. it won't be the death of us, unless some religious nutter gets hold of scientific weapons. which has happened, often. just another aspect of the struggle to maintain life on earth.
and don't feel too superior, if you have graduated to rational and secular society. the current gravest danger to life on earth is the usa, who would claim to be one too. simple greed is a more potent danger than religion, currently. their greed has reached toxic intensity.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
there is an underlying principle which directs the seeming chaos of the usg, and it's not difficult to understand: 'power tends to corrupt, and absolute power tends to corrupt absolutely.' - lord acton, more or less. the structure of the usg creates a small body of powerful people, and that body tends to become corrupt and more corrupt with the passage of time. there is inadequate countervailing action from the electorate, because of ignorance and misinformation.
this became evident in the activity of state governments in years around 1900, and stimulated what has come to be known as the 'progressive' movement. the result was that many states re-wrote their constitution with some or all of the features of democracy. california is the largest and most evident exemplar of this movement: it has and uses regularly, referendum, initiative and recall. if it were independent, it would be the sixth largest economy in the world- so democracy works well.
will it work well at the federal level? i think not. the federal constitution has frozen the usa in the plutocracy created by james madison, and the resulting society can only be changed by revolution.
trump is merely the latest 'caesar' in the history of new rome, perhaps not the worst, even- the pnac gang should be in prison for war-crime, which trump hasn't managed, yet. there will be more, for there is no way to change the usg, short of revolution.
2
-
2
-
suppose for a moment that usa was run by a caste of quasi-sociopathic thieves and murderers.
now look at the actual ruling group? can you tell the difference?
i can't. i participated in yer real live genocidal war crime, usually called 'the vietnam war.' some canadian complained about what he saw in a place called 'mylai,' and nobody went to jail, although the field commander did a couple of years in barracks while they waited for the blaze to subside. 'saint' jimmy carter actually spoke up on his behalf, presumably because he saw some votes in it.
about 350 women and children, machine gunned in a ditch.
i began planning to leave, at that point, i don't know how you can endure the shame.
the thing is, the government has always been evil, and it shaped the whole nation to be complicit.
fortunately, while the nation is capable of any crime, the people in it are incapable of much planning, beyond divvying the loot. we can reasonably expect collapse will be sudden, and not long in coming.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
you see, the usa is not a democracy. it is an elective monarchy. it used to be an elective aristocracy, but the aristocrats have washed their hands of foreign policy. and the american are not citizens, they are just civilians.
result: hopelessly ineffectual management of the nation, chaos in international affairs. but don't blame trump, because he is just the result of a constitution that has created this shambles of governance.
"what is to be done?" nothing, nothing will be done. the shambles will roll on, because there is no means to change things in the people's grasp, and those in power are only concerned with their own welfare, prosperity and power.
revolution is the only cure, but that needs heroes, and americans are only survivors, if they are lucky.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
the swiss live in a democracy. makes them proud. keeps them at peace, in principle. [the nazis tested it.] the nazis surrounded them, with help from fascism and petain. there was a certain amount of gun-fire, and trade, at the same time. tight-ropey.
the situation now is more desperate, since eu likely to continue, while hitler was clearly here today, gone tomorrow.
but! there is a little hope on the horizon- italy rather likes the 'one belt, one road.' maybe italy, and the swiss will simply opt out of eu, trade with prc. from here, that looks like a very attractive alternative for both italy, and helvetia.
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
not really a war. more of an invasion, occupation and subsidy of a puppet state.
why? well, put pressure on iran, the anti-christ who threw off usa domination. a gateway to xinjiang, to finance resistance to prc that was to become the new anti-christ, that used usa trade to make itself rich and strong.
but most of all, probably a sink into which to pour taxes while diverting some into munitions shareholders hands.
inefficient theft, but not liable to detection or retribution.
the people of usa are ignorant and passive chumps, the mirror image of the avaricious elite who own usa. both are weak because of the other, and both will suffer as prc assumes the role of dominant economic power.
the rich will retire to their caribbean island, the poor will starve, the few remaining middles will accuse everyone else of crimes and stupidity.
1
-
so you buy a political voice. just another demonstration of plutocracy in action.
if you want to make everyone's voice equal, it's simple: establish democracy. one citizen, one vote, for referendum, initiative and recall.
yang is trying to change an imperial plutocracy into a slightly more equal plutocracy. it didn't work in rome, and it won't work in usa. aristotle put his sword point on the key question: "who decides."
now, it's a few hundred politicians in a nation of 320 millions. that is power even more concentrated than wealth, and both are bound together. in every elite-rule society.
throwing bread to the masses is a good idea, and money better. but it won't break the grip of wealth and power. who decides is the key, which shapes everything else.
for that, you need a new constitution. this one was written to preserve wealth and slavery. veneration for this document is absurd.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
can't pardon ja, cause he did nothing wrong. news flash murrikins--- your gummint is nothing but a criminal gang. it's depressing, because there seems to be nothing you can do, short of throwing the deer rifle in the pick-up and driving towards dc. that ain't gonna work either, but it's easier than wishing very, very hard that they would all disappear. that would cause a headache, you'd have to cure it with a week-long drunk, and that would lose yer job, except it's long gone. back to the pick-up.
there really is no happy ending here, even revolution seems impossible,
gabbard is looking good for the first military dictator of usa, while with her left hand she does a bit for female equal opportunity.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
pr. sachs is a very welcome voice of sanity in human affairs, but it seems clear that sane and honest evaluation is of little value in the struggle of governments for dominance.
we came up with the idea of democracy, which has the potential to create a society tolerable for all, and likely to sustain the human race indefinitely. but it's not a natural condition. we are the children of the african savanna still, ruled by alphas and their beta hench-apes.
democracy is possible to us, but our masters stamp it out with lies and laws.
prc was sanctioned at birth, and they remember well the character of western nations. now they are strong enough for overt resistance, strong enough, they hope, to demand respect.
respect is not possible to western politicians, only fear. and it's difficult to make them fear, the usa military establishment is grossly larger than any other. however, it is not necessary to win a nuclear war, merely leaving the 'victor' in poisoned ruins will deter sane enemies.
so we live in hope. of course, the survival of the prc will check western/usa dominance, but will not by itself lead to democracy. at best, it is a temporary expedient. a very necessary one. unopposed, the orcs who run the usa will loot the world, and destroy our environment.
1
-
1
-
well, suppose massive economic collapse happens in the next 2 years. better trump in office. also, massive economic collapse might give us time to avert environmental collapse. so, first, "please lose, bernie, and retire loved by all." second, "congratulations on your second win, mr trump, but astronomers have detected a massive economic collapse heading our way at interstellar speed, will intersect with oval office next thursday. your thoughts?"
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
there are blueprints to democracy, and socialism. a nation of people that want democracy can have it, they may have to point a gun at the elite. once they have democracy, it's easy to get as much socialism as you want.
so why is usa a functioning plutocracy?
because that's the plan created by james madison. his constitution flash-froze the elective oligarchy of post-revolutionary usa, with the overt and published goal making a polity ruled by the rich.
so if you are not rich, why is usa still a functioning plutocracy? because you can only make a fundamental change in the constitution through revolution. usans are not revolutionaries. not so far, anyway.
there was one fundamental change made in the constitution, it needed a civil war. this did not come about through a sudden revulsion about slavery. there was some of that, but the engine room of usa was changing from agriculture to manufacturing, and wage-slavery proved to be more suited to the age, than actual slavery. so the new-rich shut down the core of the old rich.
politics is simple. aristotle gave the field long and intensive thought, only to come up with. it's just a matter of 'who decides.' the rich decide in the usa, and act through their wholly-owned politicians.
if you want change, that comes from the exercise of power. that means a change from the existing powerful to a new group, this is revolution. usually there is shooting, always there is an 'or else.'
prof wolff never talks about power and shooting, he is a retired academic. if you want things to happen, organise, and arm yourselves. nothing is given to beggars.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
reform is impossible. usa is not a democracy, and the activity of the nation is directed to the aims and career advancement of the officials of government. as they are at the top, change is not seen to be useful.
no point in complaining, this is the normal human condition. h. sap. is not smart enough to see the need for democracy, and those very few who do, are incapable of revolution. this will certainly lead to the destruction of our environment, perhaps even extinction.
snowden, btw, is no hero. he was, rightly, unhappy with the activity of usa secret government agencies, and deserves credit for saying so. but he does not appear to understand that activity is the inevitable result of the structure of usa society. saying 'it just needs better people at the top' is truly counter-productive. angels don't apply for these positions, and none have been sighted recently anyway.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
whatever her virtues, many and strong, she begins her argument with lies. the usa was begun to save slavery. its constitution was written to ensure the rule of wealth, and wealth rules. hard to see putting a strong program from a foundation of lies. there was never a day when the people ruled, and there will be no such day until americans understand therir nation is a plutocracy, and if you want administration of and for the people, it must be by the people.
not by politicians, the people. such a nation is called 'democracy,' the word means rule by the people.
calling for a new constitution is a big ask. hoping the people will take that challenge takes courage at least, more probably insanity. so
usa will not become a democracy.
power will remain concentrated, and owned by wealth.
the nation will continue to decay, in spite of these political spring flowers.
and quite possibly homer sappy will end soon and badly.
not every story has a happy ending. especially when you screw with mama nature and reality as americans have been doing since birth.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
nationalism a good thing, if each nation was a democracy, but aside from the swiss, none are. when one person, or a very few, run a nation, they aim at personal wealth and power, at the expense of the other people, whether in or out of their nation.
the u. n. has done some good, so long as the major powers are not involved. but they can not stop the imperial ambitions of the usa, for lack of military strength. no point in blaming the u. n. for american greed and arrogance. be glad for what little they can do, instead.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
i'm way to the left of dr wolff, but marx was simplistic, at best. there's more to h. sap. society than economics, but marx, and many others refused to look there.
in any event, the primary question in every society is "who decides?"
if that group is small and close-knit by interest and advantage, they will prosper, at the expense of the many. see 'history.'
being one of the many, i look for a different sort of society, one that prospers most. there is one, called 'democracy.' getting democracy is the first step towards civilization.
1
-
the swiss have democracy, and they vote. 3 times a year, last time i checked, and they vote on referendums, sometimes initiatives, it's called 'democracy.'
the usa is not a democracy, and you only vote in elections, about which thief and/or pimp gets to direct the nation. that's why many, often most, don't vote. dem, rep, it's always the rich who prosper, because the rich own both.
don't complain- in the end the people get the kind of society they are willing to fight for, and american zombies got no fight in them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
if yf was so interested in democracy, he might have stayed in greece and fought to re-establish democracy there. but that wasn't a big-enough stage. so he made himself into another useless talking head. great loss. getting democracy in one small nation is proof of concept, and inspires others. instead, just empty words.
democracy doesn't come from talking, getting it is a transfer of power, and needs shooting, unless the elite can be frightened by over-whelming numbers.
but yf, and nearly everyone, has convinced himself that voting for politicians is democracy. it ain't, and those that say it is are cynical hypocrites, in general themselves politicians offering "democracy, done for you by loving hands." you fall for that bs, you deserve what you get.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
it's easy to criticize oz gummint, or any other, for that matter. but things will never get better until homer sap gets off his knees, and runs the show himself.
democracy necessarily delivers management that pisses off the fewest people. democracy, and resulting socialism, can not guarantee the best result, always, but it can guarantee aiming at that result. no elite rule ever reaches that standard, because the elite is always human, and look after themselves first, and usually middle and last as well.
how to get democracy? more difficult than you think. is there hope? no.
ozzies are not citizen quality people, they are just not raised to it. education and character, just not good enough.
what's 2nd best? give the politicians 4 years to deliver a better nation. accept no excuses, fire them at the ballot box if you think they haven't delivered.
don't confuse this with democracy. it's just a horse, bucking off an unskillful rider..
1
-
that's what 'special forces' are for, you know. i call them 'bandits,' but they may have their antecedents in the nazi 'einsatz gruppen' of particular ill-fame.
the amusing part of this news may be only be apparent to oldies: there is a graduated process which usa entered in the 60's, involving what is now the nation of vietnam .
1st, the usa financed their puppets, in a war to suppress communism.
2nd they sent advisors, to teach modern warfare and the use of usa weapons.
3rd they sent special teams, to kill pockets of communist control
4th they called up draftees and went heavy, bombs and tanks, patrol boats and air cover.
5th realized viets weren't giving in, ever.
6th ran away.
i was in step 4, and learned that the land of my fathers was ruled by evil men. once the fog of myth and lies is lifted, it's clear that usa has always been evil. it was founded to preserve slavery and protect the rule of wealth.
once you've got that, the whole place smells.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
for a little while i thought tulsi might be the leader usa desperately needs. she seems competent, not a given among usa politicians, and is aware that using soldiers to pump up corporate income is both unfair, and short-sighted. the end of that is simply military rule, which satisfies the military, top to bottom. and possibly reduced corporate income.
but most people are neither shareholders nor soldiers. this plan has been tried endlessly, it's a dead end. she could ride this popularity with the grunts into the oval office, but usa would not be much improved.
the main economic dysfunction arises from the bloated military. she could do nothing about that, would make it worse, since she would find herself issuing bonuses with every restiveness from the ranks.
what she could do, possibly, is enlist every able-bodied adult in the national militia, for a nominal wage, something like the 1000$ andy yang was talking about. this would allow her to cement her position among the poor, offer a pathway to reducing the army, with a spin-off in creating a voter base interested in peace,
1
-
1
-
why not write a new constitution?
"we, the citizens, proclaim that we are the masters of our nation, and every public act and law is effective when we assent in referendum, or when we command, through initiative."
good start, eh? this sort of nation is called 'democracy.'
there will be more in this constitution, but it establishes the fundamental power - the citizens rule.
that's what democracy means, did you know that?
don't worry about fascism, you had it all along, you call it 'americanism.'
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
citizen quality people are rare everywhere, and without them homer sap is stumbling towards population crash, perhaps extinction.
'what is to be done?' get democracy, use it to prune wealth and help the poor. get out of the war business, empires are dysfunctional, at best, and might lead to armageddon.
wishful thinking. the vast majority of h. sapiens are too busy getting a meal and have no time for politics.
and homo sociopathic seizes the stage and drives the race towards disaster.
sensible people shrug their shoulders and concentrate their efforts towards a garden in the country.
nothing to be done.
israel is a blot, a pimple on the face of homer sap. it's unusual, but none the less a part of homer's repertoire, it's way too late for shock and horror.
the only interesting question, is why does usa spend so much on the materials of war? is it's purpose merely transfer taxes to the hands of the rich?
1
-
1
-
india might prove to be a vital component in the resolution of the world order, after the decline of usa. so i like to listen in on local ideas, hoping to see where indian inclinations are. but it's too hard.
sending 10 words to work for one is not productive.
india has bent the knee to usa, just as usa begins to lose its grip on the world. bad timing for india, perhaps some local use to modi.
pak islam was willing to listen to the ball player, but he has not found a way to reward supporters, so back to the dark ages.
prc trying to find partners in the drive to enter the modern age, at least to stabilize the western border, but there is no 'there' there.
fortunately, you've got an ocean to the west, afghanistan to the north, himalayas to the east and a swamp to the south. even if anyone wanted to bother you, clearly too much trouble. maybe that sense of geographical security is the problem?
1
-
1
-
1
-
'populism' is appeal to formally impotent classes of people by elites contending for power among themselves. essentially, they hope that mass demonstrations, riots and threats of revolution will lend winning force to their side, a supplement to argument, coups or assassination.
'populism' only occurs when democracy is absent.* in a democracy, people are citizens, and they express their collective power by voting in referendum or initiative.
outside of democracy, they express their opinions by throwing rocks.
*which, of course, is nearly always and everywhere. citizens of helvetia, take a bow. all else, bow yer heads in shame.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
in fact, being in the wh for the next term will be bad for the republican brand. doesn't matter much, because both parties are 'a right wing party, and a farther right wing party.' as gore vidal put it.
usa is stuck in a time bubble, and i have not come across any one saying useful things for contemporary action. a great majority of the people are political illiterates, the natural consequence of maleducation and alienation from the process of politics. there are a few academics speaking on politics, but they persist in language corrupted by double-think and unable to reach any new conclusions. the politicians themselves are nothing but whores, and i may be unfairly disparaging honest sex workers by the comparison. in short, an age of liars for profit, which is why trump is the perfect fit.
is there any path toward a more productive future? easy to imagine one, but since we only have modern usans to work with, i am inclined to pessimism. all societies age and die, and we are going to see a giant step in that process.
because it's not cv19 that is the main actor, usa economy was a hollow shell, vulnerable to a sudden shake. recovery would need a vital political system, and the personnel in modern usg look like characters in an addams family movie, only not intentionally funny.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
it's true, there is some kind of quasi-nazi element in ukraine. but it's common, around the world. the people of ukraine have a better excuse than most, they were treated roughly by the russians in the early days of the ussr. call it mutual hate, and understandable. but those respectable finns took a similar line, for similar reasons.
the smelly part of ukraine foreign policy is the very visible activity of the usa in directing it, with bribes and military supply. it just happens that the nazis are happy to comply with usa direction. don't forget, the bush family were cozy with nazis too, the real ones. it's everywhere, a human condition, like smelly feet. which is why the bushes had to leave connecticut and move to texas, where nazis are welcome, so long as they call it 'americanism.'
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
in fact, nazis briefly had the largest segment of the vote, which is why the president invited hitler to form a government. nothing like a majority, but that's how parliamentary systems work.
don't laugh, you don't have democracy either. voting for politicians is just medieval gang warfare, with ballots replacing bullets. in fact, ballots and bullets have the same ancestor, in latin.
in a democracy, the people, known as citizens, rule through initiative and the public service manages the nation, under direction of referendum. obviously, you have none of that.
why is your system called 'democracy?' to fool the chumps, and keep them quiet. it works, see "double-think."
1
-
lessee, angry, hungry, and armed. is that a revolution? no. but endemic banditry desribes the situation. usans are incapable of revolution, needs planning and patience. most are not clear on the week after next, and those with time to plan are short-selling on advice from their leased senator.
watching usans cope with modern life is endlessly amusing, although trump is finally going to join the club with a need for a war. only a matter of days now, and that dim-witted psychopath selected by the constitution will fill the trifecta: plague, hunger, and war, leading to chaos. the scary bit, of course, is the orc-percentage in the american national character. one small war may not be enough for them.
multi-polar nuclear exchanges will serve many purposes, do wonders for the co2 balance, reduce life load on environment, perhaps to zero.
endlessly amusing, needs an asterisk.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
and the reason you don't boycott government, as a step towards democracy is... too much trouble. the talking faces make money from talking. sometimes say something amusing, but change will not appear here. change is not necessary, decay and corruption and simple incompetence can turn a giant nation into a fragile shell. enter the flying boot of fate, and the austro-hungarian empire disappears with a penstroke. usa quite resembles ussr, in its dying months.
but if not here, where? i am afraid a group of junior generals are having a few scotch and waters in an o-club, and finally one of them says what all are thinking: "there is no loyalty to the civilian government, even core trump supporters are against the others, not for him. we could offer military guidance and be welcomed."
and this might even be an improvement in usa governance. but i would bet on democracy being better in the long view.
imagine trump, biden and sanders all polling 45%, +/- 2. bad enough you still are ruled by a king, but 3 such candidates at the same level is a ship of state utterly bereft of leadership, without principle, and likely about to slip beneath the waves.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
in a moment of weakness, bernie went to the brothel, and announced he wanted to manage the place. the clients didn't like his plans and business fell off, so the owner's said, trial over. he's a nice guy, as politicians go, but he should have stayed true to socialist principles, as an independent. same result, no stains on his nose.
democracy needs citizen quality people. would-be citizens must be willing to fight, and capable of organization. not visible. usa is mired in its history, and no more capable of democracy than china. much worse, they pollute the ideal by claiming it.
1
-
the problem is, you think you would like to be living in a democracy, and you aren't, so you pretend you are, and then are cranky when it seems reality is strangely perverse in its actions. live in a fantasy, yer gonna bump into things.
you live in an elective aristocracy, functionally a plutocracy. you are not a citizen, you are only a civilian. you don't do, you just watch. until you grow smarter and braver, nothing good is gonna happen. too bad, the climate catastrophe will be on you before you change.
btw, the continual reference to 'corporations' below is reality informing you just how real the plutocracy is.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
there is a chance the bungle-on-the-capitol was a cynical exercise in preparation for drastic collapse of civil 'rights.' in favor is the obvious lack of brains involved, it was not meant to achieve anything but fear in the easily disturbed. against, is the consistent lack of intelligence throughout the trump interregnum. take yer choice, because it doesn't matter.
the usa government is evil, but so corrupt that it is evil out of character rather than plan. they bite themselves, often.
the usa constitution was written to keep the rule of the nation firmly in the hands of the 'betters.' it is consequently not responsive to the state of the nation, for the rich are the last to suffer. and the national education has been drawn to support this goal. the people are cattle, capable of the 'bungle,' incapable of citizenship, much less revolution.
i wouldn't give a damn, but the aristos who direct that ship of state make war for profit and plunder the environment for profit, and are a danger to us all.
the usa should be blockaded, all trade stopped, no visas issued.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
aoc is a good person, but she doesn't tell the truth. maybe she doesn't realize it, more likely she is afraid to say it: usa is not a democracy. it was purposely designed to allow the rich to rule, and look around you, they do. which is why the democrats are just republicans-lite, there is no future in fighting for the poor.
when the game is rigged, you either get out of the game, or change the rules, or sell yourself. adc doesn't say that, because she's in the game, and you can't change it from inside. change needs revolution, and she is not a revolutionary. can't blame her, it's dangerous, as the kennedy brothers demonstrated. worse, it's not possible when the people are too ignorant or too selfish to see the need for the sacrifices necessary to changing society.
americans are not ready for revolution, i think they never will be. there will be ruffles on the water, there were much greater ones in the 1930s, but nothing came of it. aoc is just one of the ruffles, ho chiminh, she ain't.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
homer sap is a domesticated species. most of us are ok with having the big thinking done by others. we are also a predatory species, and the most profitable prey has long been other humans. this leads to system stability with many poor and ignorant, and a few so rich that their every desire is satisfied without much thought.
so they aren't good managers of nations, and neither are the people who work for them. this is a formula for population collapse, and possible extinction.
i used to worry about this, mildly, but almost everyone is concerned with more pressing matters. so, relax, be happy--- while you can.
if 420 ppm is the pruning knife mm and many others suggest, either move away from the equator or get actively involved in real politics --- mass demos to get their attention and promises of gunfire to come. do not enter political parties, their business is the enjoyment of power, not the salvation of the race.
1
-
capitalism is just warlordism, after the warriors fell into the hands of the bankers.
and its stable, because the peasants fell too- when you will be hungry and homeless a week after losing a job, you are a serf for as long as the banks can get something from you, then you are a beggar,
usans deserve their society- they have the web, and many are armed, but they just fall to their knees, being deeply programmed that they are worthless if no one will hire them.
h. sap. goes wrong, and creates non-viable societies sometimes, and here is one.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
quit blaming trump. like every human, he does what rewards him. instead, ask yourself why is such a person in a position of authority. the answer has two parts, the position exists, and he fit the criteria of selection better than the other claimants. looking at trump now, you might say, " those other claimants must be truly sub-standard people." an even more important observation would be, " it's time we stopped having presidents." democracy works, california has it , and referendum plus occasional initiative keeps the administration working for the good of the people. so why not get democracy at the federal level?"
someone recently answered me [ i keep asking ] that it would need the agreement of a majority of the national office holders, which is true. but if you [collective ] present them with a democratic constitution and demand that they enact it, they will. just insert an 'or else' at the end.
how many would have to sign that demand? if you think getting democracy is the most important activity in your life, because not having democracy threatens life, work, environment, even survival of humanity, then get started and keep going until you get the necessary number.
1
-
1
-
1
-
india is not a colony of anyone, anymore. india is failing to develop compared to other nations, notably china, but blaming this backwardness on china is shameful.
india has an ineffectual government, you might reasonably blame britain for that, but the main problem is that india was never a nation before the brits came, and still isn't, now they are gone. there is no common political culture, beyond an imposed british colonial model, which so far has just been arrogant and greedy. certainly no democracy, large pieces of feudal small holdings which cannot generate the wealth needed for development.
what is to be done? follow the chinese path, they have been wonderfully successful, in the face of capitalist suppression. that would be hard of course. the chinese endured worse times by far than india, and perhaps middle indians can not be led to to that level of commitment.
so blame china, so much easier. but absurdly far from the truth.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
politics in usa is a theatrical event, american kabuki. when you don't have referendum and initiative, you have to pin all you political desires on a person who is collecting votes concerning a wide range of activities.
hypocrisy, plain lying, is built in to the system, inescapable. the result is a system utterly unresponsive to an electorate who are told endlessly that 'this is democracy, see, we have voting.'
orwell labeled the process double-think, but the cancer has metastasized since then.
you are not entitled to complain about the results. you live in an evil society, carefully designed to ensure that the people did not rule. if you are ignorant of this reality, progress is impossible. if you understand, why complain, if you are not going to act?
1
-
1
-
1
-
prc hopes that taliban is sane, and will do business with them so long as that hope not badly mistaken. why should they not, much to gain on both sides.
russia too has an interest in central asian prosperity, and resulting peace.
if taliban hopes to remain master of afghanistan, they need some international support, both trade and military patronage, or they will soon have usa back in their land.
i don't know who set off the recent bombs at the airport, i would guess some splinter group hoping to recruit on a 'holier than thou' program, with no intention to co-operate with anyone. perhaps this group will find themselves in a hill fort, eating roots and leaves.
afghanistan is a basket case, ultimately the handiwork of the cia. hard to imagine the usa getting back in, while every farmer has an ak-47, and a memory.
prc can transform the place, ussr made considerable progress before cia slithered into view. they aren't poor on purpose, it was done to them by usa.
1
-
i initially thought there was little to the russia connection, beyond possible commercial corruption. trump wanted a tower in moscow, and only got serious about even being a candidate when the republican competition was so pathetic. so he became a [anti-] politician while still tangled up in commercial activities. since he is crooked by habit and inclination, they are too. ultimately, this may bite him on the bum.
but the important news about trump is, remains, and shows no sign of getting better: usa political system is hopelessly ineffective, obsolete, and has created a political class reminiscent of louis 16. confronted with a challenge from a resurgent china, hard to see any thing but continuing failure for usa. that's fine with me, except-
they might start a war, or they might get in bed with indian nationalists and then start a war. that would pass for high diplomacy among the american elite.
reagan and dubya were bad enough, now trump. can't anyone in usa see they have zero chance against china with this level of management?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
prof. w. is always available, i think he must be supporting a young and greedy mistress. alternatively, if his pension is enough, he neglected to acquire a satisfying hobby.
his field is economics, but usa's problem is political- it's not a democracy and the ruling elite are unwilling to adjust their demands to the declining fortune of the state. he can tell you where the pain is, but has nothing to say about how to fix it. revolution is not in his vocabulary. never a word is heard about the possibility that the decay of the economy is built in to the law of the nation, from anyone. because that would lead to the observation that change is too hard, and we're screwed.
but societies often develop a dysfunctional character and are unable to change because the people on top are content to enjoy their position.
in simplest terms, a society with citizen initiative [aka 'democracy'] can act to create better conditions for the non-elite. but there are no democracies, except the swiss. and that's why the austro-hungarian empire disappeared, and so will the usa.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
it's true, the 2nd amendment offers a protection against government, and i would support holding on to it. unfortunately, it doesn't work. usa society accepts the ideas of capitalism, and poverty, gun crime and pervasive drug crime result. in principle, having a judge stand between arrest by the government and the individual is a good idea, but somehow the rich get away with fraud more often than the poor.
most chinese seem well- satisfied with their government, and it's not just the current prosperity. that's clearly helpful, but i lived there in the 90's and everyone was uncertain about the future, but most thought the central committee had the situation under control. deng xiao ping is never going to be the giant figure that was mao, but his guidance was the second half of the modern resurgence of china, they should put his picture beside mao on tiananmen.
1
-
1
-
1
-
what's in a name. italians, like other sane people, don't like their government. so they try them out for awhile, and get sick of it, and flip a coin for something new. it's often done peaceful, nowadays, that's encouraging.
unfortunately, it's never new - it's just another gang of politicians.
the 'get sick of it' part happened over-night in limey-land, and my guess is this lot will be on the nose in a year as well.
won't do any good, though. homo sapiens is just too stupid to see the use of democracy. it's genetic - several hundred thousand years of selecting for survival by saying "yessir!" to alpha males has marked our genes.
the situation is not quite hopeless. there are sparks of proto-democracy here and there, although the continual use of the word for non-democratic societies is a deep worry.
extinction is on the horizon, we may get a temporary reprieve from mere civilization collapse, whether from climate or war.
should be lifting our game, but it's more of the same.
1
-
1
-
1
-
it's nice that a shred of reality peeps through, here, and other places, but it makes no difference. usa will not change without revolution, and i see no sign of that combination of mass revulsion and effective organization needed for revolution. some societies continue on the path set at birth, in fact most.
usa was a wrong turn for humanity. founded on slave labor, unlikely to generate community spirit, is it?
china is the only successful example of revolution, and it appears that it will be the leading society soon, so long as usa doesn't think nuclear war is an adequate substitute for national efficiency. but even china has its own failure built in. when you only have homo sapiens to work with, no lasting edifice can result.
climate disaster and accompanying war, famine and disease will prune humanity soon.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
mr dore, if you were a citizen of a democracy, you could instigate an initiative to get m4a. and a lot more. but yer not. yer a civilian in a political aristocracy, and you make a living by being rude to politicians. politics for adolescents, except you get money from it. usa is a plutocracy and all politics is done for money.
so nothing is going to change, until some usan understands what mao and many others have said, "power grows out of gun-barrels."
insults and coarse language just earn you a living, some kind of concerted action is necessary for change. i recommend getting democracy, but
people in usa don't know what it is, while insisting they have it. this is national insanity.
in any event, making a living out of insulting a politician is forgivable. and so easy! but not constructive.
1
-
1
-
3rd party is not the answer. getting democracy is the answer. stop ennobling politicians, demand to be citizens.
at gunpoint, if required. shooting politicians is not murder, if the revolution succeeds. and it's not necessary to pull the trigger, just necessary to look serious. a transfer of power, from politician to people, is the only cure for the nation's disease. it requires citizen quality people. if you are content to say 'politicians should do what's right, and i'm busy elsewhere' - well, that's how you got here. i wish you were just mistaken, but i fear you are just too weak. in which case, things are gonna get much worse.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
the usa is not a democracy. it is an elective aristocracy whose members are so dependent on money to stay in office that they must placate donors. normally a few rich men. once you have grasped this, political activity in the usa starts to make sense. it is already an oligarchy "the rich" rule. but since it is a masked oligarchy, there is a great deal of informality in the operation. most of the politics that counts is simply chat at a party between donor and client.
no good purpose is served by referring to the usa as a democracy. doing so is either naive, or cynical. there is no reference to democracy in the constitution, "we, the people," was simply a lie, and at the time referred only to about 10% of the male population. in discussions about establishing the constitution, madison was explicit that its purpose was to make democracy impossible. with success- more people can vote, but the rich still rule, and will continue to rule until people stop talking about american democracy, and actually get some.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
if yer too dumb, or too frightened, or too lazy to get democracy, then you will be ruled by an elite.
elites are invariably entitled, selfish, often brutal, always greedy. letting them rule is profoundly stupid, and ultimately suicidal. and there is where you are at.
there can be no elite, without a passive, hopeless and ignorant mob, and there is where yer at.
this is why societies die.
democracy is rule by the citizens, through referendum and initiative. and you ain't got it. i'm afraid it's too hard for you.
1
-
"we, the people..." is the first lie. the people were not consulted about the constitution, except in rhode island. they had a referendum, and rejected it.
with that start, you are warned that usa is run for the rich. much is made of 'freedom,' which includes the freedom to prosper, and the freedom to starve. i don't know why americans put up with this constitution, in other countries, they have revolutions. mostly they don;t work out, but lately the chinese revolution seems brilliantly successful.
america needs a new constitution, and that means a transfer of power, and that means violence. usually. but if 90% of the people said "we're going to have a socialist democracy," the 10% might pack their bags and leave for ireland. the irish would welcome them, assuming they brought a lot of money, and everyone would be better off.
right, there's the plan, execute!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
difficult to argue with mr hedges, but what tyrants love to hear is "give peace a chance."
i estimate that this conflict has begun because of the expansion of nato, which has rolled over the former members of the ussr, one by one. nato is an imperial organ of usa foreign policy. it's nice that they use bribery instead of bullets, but usa is extending an empire, even so. and they promised not too, many years ago. liars to the core, everyone.
finally, putin feels threatened, the wolf is at the door, so he starts shooting
think of it as a much-battered wife, unable to fend of with muscles, so she picks up a gun and makes a winning argument, for a change.
putin is no fool, unlike recent usa presidents, and i suspect he struck back reluctantly. but the di is cast, and we all wonder how this turns out.
since falling into the hands of billionaires, ukraine has become the poorest nation in europe. there should be a lesson there, but homer sap is just too dim to understand the need to get democracy, at any cost. no shame in that ignorance, it is general, and the usa suffers from it. as a result, their masters have license to harrow the planet to feed their greed.
there is no virtue on either side of this conflict. johnny, don't get yer gun.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
17 years? whose fault is that? american companies struck individual deals with the chinese in search of cheap labor, and/or access to the chinese market. no complaints from the usa government. still no complaints from apple, or buick, and many other companies. enter trump, who has noticed america is screwing its workers with globalization. and surprise! he's president. that should tell you that american political parties are both utterly corrupt and quite ineffectual. trump won the republican primaries, remember, making the professional politicians look like effete and entitled fools? then he knocked over hillary, simply because she didn't dare visit the rustbelt/flyover cities, having nothing to offer them. it's you that don't get it. trump didn't win, so much as notice that usa is hollow and broken. don't call him 'trump,' call him 'any one not a politician.' and don't blame china. they are not strong, it's just that usa is so weak. @mactek6033
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
you might think the brits would wake up and grow up, but no.
they will go on submitting to politicians, and watch their nation sink beneath the waves, expecting that sooner or later, a 'good' politician will appear.
there are no good politicians.
the damage done by 'testing' politicians is similar to letting adolescents drive first, then do a road test if they survive.
the british model of government is simply civil war, with ballots replacing bullets. the goal is not 'delivering good national management,' the goal is 'getting power, and doing what we please.'
of course, this is not unique to britain, they spread the principle widely while they conquered a lot of the world.
and using ballots instead of bullets was an evolutionary step up.
but it's not nearly good enough for modern conditions.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
the management of india has never impressed anyone. let's blame the british. they were in charge , impressed their ideas and even language, and britain's a mess, too.
farm laws? every farmer i've met, granddad was one, figures they should be left alone from government management - until they need a cheap loan, until they need public investment in water supply, until they need price support. they are good-time capitalists, bad-time communists.
of course, the situation is much worse in india, cows are sacred, instead of a large part of agribusiness.
1
-
1
-
1
-
if you understand the level of technology, the structure of the american state, and human character, snowden's 'revelations' should be no surprise at all. it is greeted with simulated surprise by many, who wish to evade embarrassing questions.
but snowden did add this of value: many naive people needed a face and an insiders account to look at this part of reality perhaps there were shocked, and educated. but nothing will come of this, nsa/cia own the government. and snowden personally is not an admirable man. still, he has done some good, however fleeting, and has landed on his feet in russia. i hope he prospers there, or wherever he finds refuge, because even marginally useful whistleblowers should be cherished.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
in fact, universal military training [and service ] is a fundamental part of democracy. the swiss used to have it, but the eu is proving more dangerous to them than hitler. they can buy out, now.
since usa is not a democracy, a large army is a prelude to a big war. 'special forces' of small mercenary units were designed to keep order and collect loot around the world, very much the pirate flag vessels of the usa ship of state.
they are no longer adequate, as the low-hanging fruit has been gobbled up and further income must come from dangerous victims. iran and venezuela can fight, and usa doesn't frighten russia or china any more. the military remains large, but the economy that supports the military is crumbling. and the draft would 'cure' unemployment, shifting potential rebels into defenders of the rich.
universal military service is desirable. but first you must get democracy, so that the army serves the people
1
-
bernie will do very little, and what he does will be overturned as soon as buttigieg gets in, possibly as a republican, but more likely as a centrist democrat. the fatalist acceptance of the current political structure means no substantive change can be made, not even by a bernie. i don't know what you were doing in high school, but clearly it wasn't reading history. fdr had a much more restive nation, and made gestures towards socialist support of the poor- but here you are, in the 'gilded age' mark 2 even so.
there's a reason for that, if you figure it out perhaps you can make progress. wouldn't bet on it- the french have political philosophers, the chinese have revolutionaries, while americans have talk shows, politics as entertainment.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
americans in general are not much aware of the rest of the world. there is a feeling of 'we're the best, who cares.' which is out of date. many nations have a better standard of living, many more have a more equitable distribution of the national cake. and when it comes to making things and doing things, china is out in front, daylight 2nd.
china is eating america's lunch, because the masters of usa have moved their base of production to china in search of greater profit. putting a tariff wall on china might make sense if those american companies couldn't move, but they can and have already demonstrated that they will.
more importantly, china doesn't really need usa. unlike the usa, they can plan as a nation, and plan for the long term, usa can't. add in the simple size of china and anyone who picks an economic fight is gonna lose.
usa has a long suit: military production and equipment, and well-trained bandits-in-uniform more politely known as special forces. they might be tempted to recover economic domain by threat of war. that can't end well for anyone, so one is tempted to assume they won't. both germany and japan began ww2 with similar stresses in play, and the elite of both countries chose victory or death. the elite of the usa is less brave, their combat aims are piece-meal commercial acts. but the invasion of iraq was miscalculated, just like the invasion of vietnam. there is really no reason to expect sanity from american masters. their greed has become a psychopathology.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
trump has 2 assets: still somewhat rich, and not a professional politician.
contemptible character, somewhat dim, vain and cowardly, but even when summed up, he looked better than the anointed member of the ruling caste, and this judgement was the right one. not that he had any good qualities, except, he wasn't 'one of them.'
usa is a mighty nation, ruled by a small oligarchy of contemptible people.
this situation occurs in human history quite often.
the body strong, the brain syphilitic.
so there is a case for taking a deep breath and waiting for internal collapse of the usa. this is the core of prc planning.
trump? trump is trivial trash on the dung-heap of history. but the nation might set the world on fire, from the petulance of 3 or 4 rich men. none of them trump.
1
-
1
-
mr hedges is correct, but the poor man is singing his song to the deaf.
the usa was structured to create a populace of ignorant and passive cattle, alienated from public life and ignorant of any path to democracy. the plan was successful, many or most of the cattle are proud to be 'individuals.'
cattle are individuals, people have the possibility to be citizens of a democracy, part of a management group which directs the nation.
julian has to be crushed. he has exposed the workings of usg, and threatened the myths which support empire.
he is a fool. he effectively called on a herd of cattle to get on hind hooves and start talking. talk about dumb!
they ain't gonna. they can't.
he could have been ignored. but the masters of usa were a little nervous, and there are some of them who get paid to find and crush embarrassing voices. so they do. he has to be crushed! or we don't get promoted.
julian is a fool. people call him 'hero,' and 'treasure,' but no one says, 'let's march!"
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
trump is not yer problem. the constitution is your problem. but i suspect usans are afraid to look there, as the cure is revolution.
do you imagine clinton or biden could have, or will fix anything? the usa economy was a zombie, held up by world wide fear of collapsing usd.
the virus has done you a favor, allowing you to put your systemic collapse on a pandemic, and a clown. no one asks why other developed societies cope with the virus so much better, and don't have clowns driving the bus. but that 'favor' allows you to ignore reality a little longer. that is not good for long-term survival.
no matter, just spit out trump, and the sun will come out, and 'aquarius' will be heard throughout the land. why worry, be happy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
it turns out, when you operate a military organization [nato] as an instrument of commercial/economic aggression, there is back-lash, of commercial/economic nature. usa was publicly pleased with their success in installing a submissive government into ukraine, but mr putin has decided, "basta!"
ukraine suffers for usa aggression, now europe may suffer for supporting usa aggression, certainly they will be cold. and a lively prospect of nuclear war has arisen.
the natural result would be revulsion of their government in usa and europe, for inviting nuclear destruction.
alas! nothing natural about foreign affairs when usa involved. they press buttons, the resulting deaths are elsewhere.
russians are notably frank,, let's hope that they will remind usg that washinton dc is in reach.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
he might end up with the nomination, but not have the democratic party behind him. never forget, presidents propose, congress agrees, modifies and/or denies. and by now you may have noticed, most democrats are not socialists. people get excited about presidential nominations, remember mr. 'yes, we can?' well, no, you can't. the american constitution establishes plutocracy, so don't get too excited.
it's a shame, someone comes along, andrew yang notably, and says 'things are falling apart, here's a way to fix them,' and all you get is bernie and mayor pete. bernie might at least be trying, but he has no notion of how to change things, except 'return to yesteryear.' good if possible, and you are white male, but those days are history, and led to today's failure.
america's today is the direct result of madison's determination that the rich should rule. neither bernie nor andy have said 'we need a new constitution,' they don't think so, or maybe they think it's too hard for americans- andy has said their iq is depressed. but when power is held by a few hundred people, they will be bought. just look at any discussion about american politics- always money enters soon and heavy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
like any other society with a political elite, usa is rotten. the cure is getting democracy, but it requires surgery. in practice, the removal of heads. sorry folks, actual democracy needs citizen quality people, and a nation submissive to politicians will never have it. the reason you have a right to own guns is so you don't have to put up with those hyenas, but the guns won't do it by themselves.
on the plus side, politicians are few, and they haven't been to war for generations, due to a desire to enjoy wealth and continuing good health. so if you just show them the front of the gun, they might retire and leave you in control of yer nation. use it wisely.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
stop laughing, it's not funny.
if you let politicians run yer life, this is what you get.
democracy is a different thing. not perfect, we only have humans to work with. but at least putting matters to referendum or initiative will satisfy the majority. this likely to be much better than watching politicians and their bankers suck all the juice out of society.
how to get democracy? really easy, if most people want it. not sure they do-- some think they have it, some think they deserve to rule, some think if they kiss the rulers bum they will be thrown a few coins, and the left-overs might be less than half, or just too depressed and oppressed to act.
h. sap. is in deep shit, entirely own fault, and survival uncertain.
1
-
1
-
1
-
this is a practical demonstration of modern warfare. a shoulder-fired weapon can knock out the toughest tank, a drone missile sink a cruiser, guided bomb from orbit hit and destroy the biggest carrier, or a city.
so politicians, if sane, resort to economic warfare, as usa has been doing in the balkans, and now ukraine. buy an army, give them a direction, and wash your hands. support with endless lies and measured empty promises.
poor vlad has been driven to obsolete methods, as the other choice was submission and oblivion. difficult to feel sorry for him, at the same time, the prospect of a usa empire has long since lost any attraction.
it's possible homer sap is incapable of survival. for lack of control over the sociopaths who drift into power.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
'one person, one vote,' what music!
unfortunately, pr. wolff is an economist, not concerned about political science.
one person, one vote, happens in the usa, and it does not support a decent society.
voting is not democracy. in the usa it's an empty pacifier.
democracy is rule by the citizens. 'democracy' means 'citizens decide.'
they do so by voting, but not for people. citizens vote in referenda and initiative for law and public action and thereby express the will of the nation's masters, the citizens.
will they establish socialism? not necessarily. they don't have to.
switzerland is the only democracy among our nation-states. they take care of one another, sometimes with laws and practices that might appear in overtly socialist societies. but they are not a socialist nation. they are a democracy.
instead of 'the nation takes care of me,' they are 'we take care of one another.' certain aspects of capitalism flourish there, notably in foreign relations.
socialism without democracy is possible, the ussr demonstrated why that is not necessarily a good thing.
socialism without democracy can be admirable, the scandi's and a few others have made it work for awhile. but usa drifted in that direction in the 30's, and then lost it, because politician rule can be bought, and was. the constitution was designed to facilitate that result.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
this is fantasizing. politics is formalized power. aristotle wrote on politics, long ago, and said, in the end "who decides?' the person with power decides.
it is pointless to talk about, 'what should we do,' if you have neither intention nor power to do anything.
of course, empty talk is popular everywhere, who has not babbled on about a better world. and if you can make a living at it, so much the better. tv evangelists commonly make millions by simply explaining how to get to heaven. i may be out of date here, are there still tv evangelists, in the evil empire? but there are talking heads leading discussion about social improvement, for a living. may do some good, and amuses a lot of people.
but revolution not done here, and real change needs revolution.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
if you had democracy, this question would be silly.
but you have an elective oligarchy, which happens to be a functional plutocracy.
politicians rule, oligarchy, there is voting, which has no effect on national policy, and nothing happens that irritates the rich. plutocracy.
you deserve no better. politics is the exercise of power inside a society, and if the people are unable to control the government, it is because they are ignorant, or fearful. democracy needs citizen-quality people, armed, organized and willing to shoot a few politicians who get above themselves.
in a real democracy, of course, there are no politicians. they're extinct. the public service runs the nation, under direction of referendum and initiative.
but you just are not at that level of evolution. pity, it's no fun, being a serf.
1
-
1
-
the democratic party allowed bernie to run as a contender for the nomination, because otherwise clinton would have sailed un-opposed and ignored, or risked being beaten by an actual democrat who wasn't so hopelessly tarred by the goldmann, sachs brush. he double-crossed them by being popular. they hate him for it. he won't get any help from the machine. i think bernie should not run, his day is past. worse, he actually supported clinton, a democrat who despised the ex-working people of the mid-west. some socialist. a lot of mid-westerners might remember that.
andy yang in particular is dealing with current reality in a very impressive way. he's actually running, in the mid-west, with concrete plans to get them back into american economy. there is no second choice, really. if you are not ready for ubi, many think gabbard, or buttigieg are at least presentable. but if you are not ready for ubi, there will be someone worse than trump along soon, because the bernies are just as out of touch as the clintons.
1
-
1
-
1
-
a brief lesson in 2 party, winner takes all politics: there can never be much difference between the parties because that would allow one party to make small offerings and create dominant majority. when both parties are dependent on rich donors, they both will speak for the rich. if one party gets sufficient support for a popular candidate by many small donations, this threatens the rich and the central party officers, and they combine with media to destroy candidate, and the party if it does not conform to the plutocracy. dnc got the message, and started counting the votes more effectively.
you don't live in a democracy. you don't deserve to live in a democracy. you tolerate plutocracy, because resistance is too hard, maybe even too dangerous.
they have plutocracy, it was built in to the constitution. they are not going to give it up to people who say, "may i have more, please?"
history is useful: democracy comes from a classical greek phrase, 'demos kratia', commonly translated as 'people rule.' but the translation is sloppy, because english needs a paragraph to translate 'demos'. 'demos' actually means the citizen warriors, active and retired. if you don't fight, you don't vote. this was true of swiss democracy too, until quite recently. it should be true everywhere, militias are not suitable for invading other countries, that needs mercenaries. vietnam taught american rulers that lesson.
relevance to biden vs trump? only this: you concern yourselves with flea bites, while dying of moral cancer.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
i would agree with your 'given' principles, except that it's an imperfect world.
the alternative to attacking ukraine now would be nato/usa attacking russia later. nato/usa has no notion of 'enough,' they said so, very clearly.
you can't bargain effectively with sociopaths, and that is the usg. they are driven by greed, which has no concept of enough.
occupying ukraine is a desperate measure, putin no doubt gave it a lot of thought. but russia has in its living memory the process and result of 'negotiating' with sociopaths, backed by western sympathy for nazis, and there are plenty of visible public nazis in ukraine. he decided that such people only understand the muzzle of a gun. so he reminded the world of the russian nuclear capability, and started renovating ukraine.
i think the situation is somewhat similar to the onset of ww2. putin is determined that this time russia will not be attacked, or the world will burn.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
there was no democracy in the north, many states didn't even pretend. no land, no vote was common. and the south was economically more important than the north from birth - the 'revolution' was driven by southern plantation owners worried about losing slavery. remember "give me liberty, or give me death?" that was the liberty of white plantation owners to enslave black people. and it paid well, even before the cotton gin.
there is no democracy in the federal government to this day. voting for 'which' master is not democracy, it is oligarchy, more specifically elective aristocracy. since politicians do not prosper unless they support wealth, the aristocrats listen to the plutocrats, and both ignore the cattle.
look around you, do you see rule by the citizens? the word 'democracy literally means, 'rule by the citizens.' if you speak or read greek, you couldn't be so easily fooled.
a nation without rule by referendum and initiative is no kind of democracy, 'democracy' is just a convenient myth in usa. and the people of usa will never enjoy the benefits of citizenship while they are ruled by any elite.
the rich rule now, but the generals are getting restive. join the army, that's the growth industry in usa, that's accessible to poorly educated people. your masters will keep you fed and housed, unlike the rich. they have to. generals have to worry about restive soldiers, and ambitious colonels.
1
-
1
-
you haven't got democracy, that's why oligarchs can do as they please.
since you refuse to admit you haven't got democracy, how can you possibly get it?
and since the people do not rise up and install democracy, what hope can there be for usa?
the people are enslaved by custom, lies and ignorance, the rich have lost any connection with the cattle, and the middles are satisfied with carving out a survival bubble for themselves.
to be fair, usa was born crap, a device to rule by the rich, most of the rich being slave masters, and the middles carving out a place by massacre of the natives. where can ethical behavior grow in such an environment?
well, it doesn't, as the vietnam war[crime] and iraq war[crime] demonstrated. and plenty more, of course, chomsky came up with 100+...
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
most usa problems arise from a fundamental and profound weakness, usa is a functioning plutocracy, expressly designed to be ruled by wealth. this weakness is compounded by a near universal belief that usa is a democracy.
i should say, not belief in some cases, rather a complicity in the national myth for personal comfort.
human society is characterized by struggle for position, and any society in which some children start off with a wealthy or powerful family is an aristocracy, for wealth buys power, and power soon is rich.
usa is not a democracy. its people do not enjoy the basic privileges that accrue to any society where the people are the ruling class. they never will, until they rebel.
patience is not an option. elite rule is destroying the environment, mere drinking water will soon be in short supply.
i see no consciousness of the need for revolution. perhaps a partial amelioration could be achieved, with secession?
the west coast could leave, california by itself would be a prosperous democracy. perhaps the north-east would follow, making bubbaland impotent to threaten the world.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
trump is not a symptom of decay within the republican party. they are rotten, trump out-lied 20+ candidates. but the democrats are equally rotten. they had one candidate, anointed, a few trivial voices, and a socialist straw-man to hold interest right up to the planned result.
but any political party is a business. it will inevitably look after the interests of its members, with due regard to internal status. they made the visible decision that clinton would do best accommodating wall street, ahead of the rust belt. for a party that pretends to be for the common american, that is real corruption. and it didn't pay off, a bit of surprise there even if very close.
the usa constitution has corruption and entitilement built in, it was written to ensure the rule of the rich, after all. it is not a document establishing democracy, it's purpose is to make sure democracy didn't happen. 230+ years later, we can say it has been brilliantly successful in the achievement of that goal.
so trump happened. a little tear in the fabric of political structure. but under that tear, real unrest- a lot of 'middle' americans have found themselves unemployed or under-employed. neither party is much interested in america's losers, and both allowed that to be obvious before 2116. trump simply lied his way into the oval office.
the constitution is hopelessly obsolete. the political professionals are widely despised, and a few new faces won't change the character of the parties. there is no way for the people to rejuvenate the system, except revolution. and there is no visible call for radical change. the establishment are entitled to die in office, the people are ignorant and handless, and the few radicals seem to think they can beat the system, if only they are elected. has never happened before- even fdr did not change the system.
trump really is a symptom, but of a terminal disease.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
no one has rights, who does not have power. the problems perceived in american government policy arise from the power held by the rich. they were expressly given this power by the writers of the constitution, chiefly madison. talking heads are empty faces, if they do not first address the acquisition of power. first you get the tools, then you build the house.
transferring power from the politicians to the electorate, a revolution to democracy, is simple. however, it's not easy. first you have to convince a sufficient number of americans to stand up and demand democracy. this is somewhere between difficult and impossible. but it is necessary, nonetheless. this difficulty is why many 'talkers' don't address the fundamental problem. they are looking 'under the streetlight, ' and not in the 'dark alley,' evern though they know the car keys were dropped in the alley.
there is no money or prestige to be gotten by telling people that they must struggle for democracy, before the prizes are given to them. of course, many talkers are just making a living, from speaking engagements, and many others are on a drip, from the kochs.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
it's very easy to lie and spread lies on the web, everyday there is a new 'private' blog denigrating china. but reality is still available, because of genuine private channels such as this one.
it is not difficult to spot the real evil, just look at the objective news: 'iranian government officer [and several bystanders] murdered by drone.' 'venezuelan trade interdicted by us navy' and of course there is the 16 year occupation of iraq, floating on a monstrous lie.
i decided, back in vietnam days, that the government of my native land was entirely in the hands of sociopathic monsters who would hang if they did not direct the biggest military establishment in the world. if anything it has gotten worse, frequently shameless and unrestrained in their crimes.
saves a lot of thought. usa--- bad! anyone else, possibly good, certainly not as bad.
'On 3 January 2020, a United States drone strike near Baghdad International Airport targeted and killed Iranian major general Qasem Soleimani while he was purportedly planning to meet Iraqi Prime Minister Adil Abdul-Mahdi in Baghdad.'
when did public murder become an acceptable tool of foreign affairs?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
i contend that the usa constitution is the core of the problem. by locking the people out of participation in the direction of the nation, madison created a nation of 'private' people, unconnected to one another. since their opinions didn't matter, any opinion became possible, and irrelevant. this creates the fundamental alienation which underlays the failure of 'historical' lefties to organize. why doesn't revolution happen, when conditions are right? because they aren't right, marx was clear, that a nation populated by lumpen proles was not revolution material.
usa will never become a democracy, and real social progress can only come from democracy. history is littered with empires which prospered through conquest, and died from popular alienation. usa will join them.
the constitution is just a document, but it codified a society dedicated to greed and created the habits of mind and culture which are throttling the nation.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
only a few. india is polite. but india has decided to compensate for its hopeless domestic management by shaking its fist at prc, under the shade of the usa. so i am glad to learn a bit about india's view of the world, and the likelihood of initiating ww3 in the himalayas.
and i learn that mr gupta hasn't grasped the essential reality of china's society: it is managed by a small group of smart people, who command a large group of smart people, who make the nation go as they think best. those people are not god-like in their capabilities, but the management of prc is visibly the best in the world over the last 40 years, with daylight second and india also ran.
so attempting to make fun of their radical actions has a hollow quality.
i think it is way too soon, to say "ccprc has lost its mind! numbers on share markets are sacred!"
instead, a little humility would be in order, along the lines of "recent developments have left me amazed, i shall be following the progress of the most successful government in the world with great disquiet."
1
-
the usa is an elective oligarchy. it will never be a democracy. the constitution concentrates federal power in a few hundred people who are easily bought. they are wholly owned by those few 10;s of thousands who can write big checks.
does this reality make you unhappy? enough to make you devote 20 years of your life to changing it, all of your wealth and time, at great personal risk?
if so, please tell us the public aspects of the struggle, to create the neutral field in which revolutionaries can write history..
this hasn't happened in the usa, not now or ever. it was born to protect slavery and the rule of wealth, and the rich still rule, without the need of feeding slaves.
it has happened in other nations, marx provided a quasi-religion somewhat like primitive christianity, and ussr, prc, prvn, and even cuba followed much the same path, a hard one and long, except cuba who found the american criminal puppet state laughably weak.
must revolutions be communist? pragmatically, yes. how else can you energize the millions of shirtless ones to overthrow the hired armies of the rich?
well, there is real religion- iran used islam in place of marx, with some success.
back in the ussssa- abandon hope. you haven't got the grit for revolution, not the community cohesiveness, and the churches are working for the rich. many of them are the rich. study the emergence of russia from the collapse of ussr. i think you are going there.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
pf chomsky deserves great respect, he has been exposing the emperor's nakedness longer than most.
but reality is, the crimes of the evil empire are built in, and it rolls on regardless of contrary voices.
talk changes nothing by itself, it is barren without action.
the people of the usa are defective. it happens to human beings when a capability is not exercised, gradually, you lose the ability itself. when you don't live in a democracy, you do not acquire the character of citizens.
chris hedges is a similar case, and recently dr sachs has been making waves. doesn't matter what any of them say, the result is, "well said!" and "ain't it a shame!" and that represents the progressive element. in reality, they go nowhere.
mao listened to intellectuals as a young man, but finally he realized they were going nowhere.
the transfer of power requires struggle, most commonly civil war. "power grows from the barrel of a gun."
1
-
1
-
1
-
the germans said they were better, but they would say that. in fact, every one, literally everyone, said the german army was the best. didn't matter: hitler said in 'mein kampf,' this will be a war of extermination, and when it became clear he meant it people stopped surrendering. german letters and diaries started reporting, "these guys never give up!"
there are plenty of 'mitabins' in the conduct of the war, but the simple fact was that soviet munitions production surpassed german at the first day of the war, there was a blip while production was moved to the urals, but supremacy was re-established by the time the wehrmacht got to moscow. almost to moscow. at that point, hitler became a walking dead man.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
during the russian revolution, lenin found it necessary to strip ukraine of food, to feed his supporters. resulting hatred made it possible to recruit a ukranian division in support of the german invasion. but hitler double-crossed them, as he wanted the food and the land.
survivors were genuine nazis, other ukranians surplus to requirements.
when hitler finally launched barbarosa, his army his army was in summer uniforms. so they survived the winter by driving peasants out of their homes, into the snow, without clothing.
you really had to be a nazi, to go on living.
so ukraine has reason to hate russia, and germany. currently, they tend to choose russia.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
if this is a surprise to you, arise sleeping beauty!
the usa is not a democracy.
it is owned by the rich.
it is managed by an elective oligarchy , a duopoly known as democratic party and republican party. neither has any ideology beyond lust for power. they differ only in their origin and history, both have courted different demographics of the electorate because of this history, but both must serve money due to the structure of the state.
socialism is anathema to the rich, and they fear democracy because it might lead to socialism. so their political agents fear it too.
bernie was infected with socialist ideas as a young man, foreign influence, no doubt. he has survived and flourished by sticking to simple material goals that the ordinary voter wants. it may lead him to the democratic nomination, it might lead him to the oval office.
but one man can make little difference without cooperation from house and senate. is he likely to get it?
so don't get your hopes up- democracy and socialism is simply too good for a nation of morlocks. more than half the nation are consumed with fear and loathing of socialism, and the politicians will have plenty of support in barricading bernie in his office.
he's not there yet, maybe 5-1 against. biden plus buttigieg will probably be the choice, and a good thing. prevents civil war. and besides- they might shoot bernie.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
lying through teeth? what do you expect? if you are too lazy to get democracy, or too ignorant, or too fearful, then you are going to be chumped by politicians. that's natures law. ask any bird, "do you enjoy being eaten by cats?" "no," they cheep, "but i gotta sleep sometime."
being a citizen of democracy requires a certain amount of spine. probably need a sense of community of interest, too, although less than you might imagine. doesn't matter, by no accident, neither quality present in usa. it's every bird fer himself.
so, only incremental change, and randomly directed, often maleficent.
will you last as long as rome? nope. rome had pollution, but you've got climate catastrophe creeping up on you. by the time exxon is brought to heel, too late!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
usa is run by oligarchs, on behalf of plutocrats. that is the legal foundation of the nation, expressed in the constitution.
if you want better performance, you have to change those fundamental laws.
this is revolution.
it might need shooting, but if enough people subscribe to a plan to establish a constitution of democracy, the opposition might go quietly.
until you admit that major change, fundamental change, is necessary, usa will remain what it has always been, a jungle for most, a garden for the rich.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
not end democracy. you never had democracy. embarrassed to admit it, apparently.
back to reality: in the elective aristocracy/functional plutocracy that madison created,
creatures like trump strive for supremacy, much like italy in the renaissance.
wealth has displaced lineage, not a big change, milords commonly married the daughters of the really rich.
the fact that a truly incompetent person such as trump can be continue to be a major figure in politics is direct proof that usa is no democracy. money put him in office, when the opposition was so entitled that even throwing a few coins to the rust belt was not thought necessary.
the usa political system is so obsolete that bidens and trumps appear to rule. neither could effectively direct a corner store, and the puppet-handlers that give biden the script that he struggles to read are more concerned with their personal position than the nation. trump did rule, about like a spoiled 7 year- old.
when politics is conducted by such people, talking about democracy is pointless. the people do not rule, and their rulers are contemptible. if you get the rulers you are willing to endure, usa people will soon be extinct.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
is there no one of consequence in usa public life who says, " if we had democracy, the nation would deliver a decent life for all, and this should be our primary goal,"
answer, no. so what of elective aristocracy, in the service of wealth- what kind of life does that deliver? good enough to prevent brigandage, even rebellion?
so far, yes. will it continue to be good enough? certainly not.
from this base, how will usa match the growth of chinese power and influence? ineffectually. china is managed by competent people motivated to improve the nation in all human activity. the usa is managed by narciccists, dements, debased and simply dim. your estimate on how the contest is going?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
during the course of the vn war, i discovered that the creatures in the usg were genuine monsters, they murdered people in 10's of thousands to shore up their personal status. the people of the usa endure this kind of rule, a great many applaud it. and nearly half of them are mothers. so, really, are you surprised? i was, but i was young and naive.
there is hope on the horizon, in the rise of the prc. no saints, but more civilized by far than usa. theyt may curtail usa excesses someday soon.
monsters? just garden variety sociopaths, and a sprinkling of psychotics, in such numbers as to guarantee the fall of the usa hegemony - you are widely hated, for cause, and your friends are only there for the hand-outs.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
it's easy to sneer at the usg, the cosmetics have largely fallen off, but they still direct the largest military, and the largest collection of nuclear weapons, so please, don't make them angry.
which leads to 'vlad's adventure,'
vlad is carving up ukraine, not clear how much he can take, or wants, but zelensky seems ready to fight to the last ukrainian. well, 2nd last - he's got a plane trip booked, to los angeles.
usa has only supplied money, they print it as needed, and weapons, well, they keep piling up so giving them away does create a nice income stream for those with stock in raytheon and general dynamics.
result: vlad is not making usg angry, no matter what they say. this war could go on until they run out of ukrainians, and still usg is smiling.
1
-
aristotle said the essential aspect of every society is simply: "who decides?" this is not "who rules," necessarily, but the difference is not significant.
in a democracy, the electorate decides. the usa is not a democracy, it is an elective oligarchy. for historical reasons, elective aristocracy is better. and the 'aristocracy' is dependent on money, so functionally, the usa is a genuine plutocracy. it will remain so until the constitution is replaced.
there is no visible interest in doing so, so plutocracy will remain until the vitality of the nation is drained, at which point some military leader will announce that he [or she, general gabbard might have a new role to play] is taking the civil government into temporary guidance.
talking about 'democracy in the workplace' is a nonsense. in the first place, many don't work, are they not part of the nation? more fundamentally, democracy means rule by the citizens, not rule by labor leaders. hi-jacking the 'good' word is commonplace, but still unconvincing.
1
-
1
-
the usa is not a democracy. its people are civilians, not citizens. it was designed to be that way, read what madison said about his constitution, in promoting it to the grandees of the convention. the language was antique, but the import is clear: the rich rule.
since then, corporations have become dominant in the financial sphere, so corporatocracy is appropriate. 'fascism' has such unpleasant memories, don't you agree?
but the formal rulers remain what they have been since 1789--- elected aristocrats called 'politicians.'
the people could seize control and create a democracy, if only they were better educated, better organized, and had some collective courage. all are lacking, and usa has a very dim future. they are a danger to the whole world.
1
-
1
-
assange is the latest 'dreyfus,' accused of treason to cover the treason of others. treason is a nonsense, he is not a usan. so they tie him to manning because he did publish mannig's accusations, not a crime, but also encourage manning in his crime.
i am reminded of the dreyfus affair, because both involved criminals accusing the innocent.
ellsberg is no champion of virtue - his wife is responsible for the pentagon papers, but this time he is old enough to speak truth to power.
truth doesn't matter anymore, and it seldom has. usa is in the grip of fascism and few escape.
the thugs in power are bad enough, but when a large %age of the proles are thugs as well, as in the usa, there is no path to light.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
well, any discussion involving 'american democracy' is not going anywhere, anymore than predicting tinkerbell will lead usans to disneyland.
what sometimes happens, is that a dispossessed middle class overturns the national myth, very gently, and the pent-up rage of the sans culottes breaks everything. something new is born, always better, but not necessarily lasting.
the french have had several revolutions, and never came close to democracy or any realization of egalite', poor russia even worse. i'm hoping usa splits apart, peacefully, as ussr did.
china, now, is a little hopeful: their revolution has lifted china to a unique degree, and they are making substantial efforts to spread the money.
the new [ marxist ] mandarinate is very suited to their history and culture, so they are likely to function well for 100 years or more.
failure is built in to every human society, and prc have no magic answer to the corrosion of privilege and corruption. i think that needs democracy, which homo sapiens is smart enough to devise, not smart enough to attain. missed it by that much!
no matter- climate catastrophe looks like leveling us to the ground, or the grave. so dance while you can, make sure your kids do mandarin in school.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
it's not enough to put bernie in the oval office. presidents need control of house and senate to do substantive things. but not a word about this fundamental fact of usa politics. the democratic party is not his friend, and then there's the republican senate. there's going to be a 'train crash' if bernie gets in, and does little. but america will get over it. they are used to it. the enthusiasm before the election is mounted on fairy dust, and collapses without harm. in the meantime, a lot of talking heads make a living from this reality theater,
biden is looking more and more foolish, no handicap in american politics, and more and more certain of success. the fix is in, he imagines. trump's presence in office should have removed all certainty, but perhaps new measures are in place, haven't had a good assassination in years. there is a morbid interest in watching a society unravel.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
it's not a democracy. but your masters can throw you cash if they wish. normally this is done with licenses to steal, and/or not be taxed. throwing cash to the plebs is an ancient idea, particularly the soldiers. but you are not shareholders, either. used to be field slaves, and then soldiers, and now, useless eaters.
but some of the elite have realized that unemployed people with the highest percentage of gun ownership in the world are not useless after all: they are a revolutionary army or uncontainable bandit gangs. the roman solution was free bread.actually, free wheatmeal. keeps longer than bread.
yand really is a smart man. he sees that it is 'free' cash, or endemic gunfire. stand up, new share-holder!
unfortunately, the koch brothers are no more far-sighted than your average lizard. they think a private army, a walled community, refuge home on sunny island is a long-term alternative to sharing with the useless.
1
-
1
-
1
-
free college is a socialist idea. also, sensible: you need educated people to operate a modern society. pete, and the republicans, hate this notion that their taxes should give the kids of poor people a chance to take jobs meant for the children of the rich. but the underlying problem is extracting money from the rich. they run the nation, and they have made tax collection difficult.
tax collection should be simple, in a digital age, and it would be simple, in a socialist society: just run every transaction through government servers, and clip off x%.
taxes, solved. education, solved.
fair and effective national management of the nation is easy, if that's your goal. it's just that a great many americans want their fair share, and as much more as they can steal.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
there is no 'must.' usg is unresponsive to the electorate, which is impotent and ignorant. wishing things would happen obscures reality, and makes action more difficult.
usg cares not a fig about isolation, and enjoys plenty of support from like-minded client governments, anyway.
so the war will continue, vlad dare not stop, usg is losing nothing, but paper money, and the ukraine government has a core support of russia-haters sufficient for active and apparently effective resistance.
poor vlad, the red army beat the best military machine in the world, his poor russian army can't even cope with ukrainian nazis.
i do wish lefties would be a little more realistic. just because there is a living to be made spouting platitudes doesn't license 'wishing on a star.'
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
let's start with the basics- who has the power to 'do.' not you, an individual, out side your personal space, nor the entire body of the people, for the usa is not a democracy. the government has the power to 'do,' and if you have money, you can buy the government. but they are expensive, so only the rich can 'do,' outside of government office.
aristotle said the important feature of society is simply, "who decides?" he was right then, and still is.
so when people tell you about their grand ideas, just ask, "have you got money, or power, or is it wishful thinking, or are you running some kind of scam? the last two are almost universally the reply.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
if you are aware that the usa is not a democracy, and that most of the crimes of the rich and well-connected could not happen in a democracy, why is not the first goal to get democracy, so that, with citizen initiative, every crime could be dealt with?
no one expects a carpenter to do good work without tools, and he wouldn't show up to work with no tools, so why do you act like a citizen when you are not a citizen, you are only a civilian, without legislative tools to direct public activity.
get democracy first, because without it, results of 'protest' are unlikely to be satisfactory, and will certainly be undone when attention shifts.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
if i were rich and famous, i would make grand pronouncements, too. it's tempting. but, is it any use?
the entire usa government could be charged with war crimes and/or genocide, and not forgetting enslavement of africans. from day one, and hardly a day missed ever since. grand pronouncements had no effect.
when will it end? the rest of us gotta stop tolerating them. wouldn't hurt to shoot a few, either.
the fact is, shooting usa soldiers is the only visible way to modify the activity of the usg. the chinese and vietnamese demonstrated this technique, it works, but it needs real conviction.
in the usa, that conviction only arises in the angry mothers of dead soldiers.
and this is why usg likes proxy fighting, nowadays. as long as it's someone else's son, no problemo.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
the constitution of the usa was explicitly written to ensure the rich ruled, not the people. the word 'democracy' does not appear, and that was by design. madison despised democracy, and said it would lead to the taxes of the rich being spent at the will of the mob. he was rich, and not inclined to share.
consequently, bernie will not save you, can not save you. only revolution can save you, but politicians like things as they are- they dispense fish, and you are grateful . yet they never let go of the fishing pole, and you never get off your knees. until you do, you are second class people.
1
-
it's true, they are getting irritated. but not nervous, as a class they have dominated most of usa history, and even in the 1930's their fundamental control was not threatened. they were bled a bit and kept their heads down, but there was no significant change to the constitution and politicians continued to rule. gradually, the rich bought them back, one at a time.
so, not nervous. american politics runs on money and the rich have most of it. 3 of the top 4 dem candidates are openly in the pocket of rich donors, half the democrat reps are 'centrists,' almost all the senate belongs to the rich. bernie in office would not do much better than mr hopeandchange, and it would be undone anyway.
you need a revolution, and no one is saying so. you would have to say, public education in the usa has done a brilliant job of blinding the children.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
useless! progressives took over the democratic party in the 1930's, but it was only temporary.
it's not enough to occupy offices, you have to change the constitution. and politicians will never do that, when they're on top and can act, they see no reason to change anything.
so change must come from outside government,
the people must organize, must become would-be citizens of a democracy, must become the decisive element of society, must write a new constitution.
are usans capable of that? are they citizen quality people? on visible evidence, no. they are cattle quality. that's why in a nation of 300 million adults, and even more personal firearms, 536 aristos can rule those millions.
democracy? those poor cows think voting for which master is going to screw them is democracy. no hope, in such a nation of cows.
1
-
not double standards, rather, none at all. usa is run by sociopaths. politicians in general are slimey creatures, when they dispose of great funds and direct great armies, they are amoral bandits.
the people of usa have no effective control of their masters, and many are no better.
the world of mankind is in great danger, war and environment contend for primacy of threat and either might decimate our species. even extinction is very possible, although of less concern.
parts of usa profit from every war, and the occupation of iraq was done for profit on a grand scale.
macron is right, usg is driven to looting nato to prop up a degenerate usa economy.
naturally, sympathy is uncalled for, european politicians are equally crooked, just less well-placed to steal.
1
-
it's not a democracy because madison explained that in a democracy, the taxes of the rich would be spent on the concerns of the poor. so his constitution established an oligarchy, with an upper house called 'senate,' which spoke for the rich, and usually said, "no."
and that's why usa has no referendum, and no initiative power. the people are just watchers. not citizens.
they can fire politicians, but only after the damage is done, and since politicians need money to get elected, the replacements are soon co-opted by wealth again.
usa is a functional plutocracy, has been from day 1. by design.
but it's worse than that. the peeps are raised to think they live in a democracy, there is 'voting,' after all. it's just that it does no good. voting for politicians doesn't work, except for the rich.
what is to be done?
leave the usa if you can, there are more civilized places.
retire to the country if you can't leave, and raise your own food. avoid paying taxes, some of it is spent doing murder in other lands.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
i guess it comes down to fate: if you start a nation to preserve slavery and empower wealth, god punishes you. i used to laugh at khomeini's 'great satan,' but using religious language saves a lot of talk.
the usa was remarkably short of ethics from birth, tourists from europe often remarked on the lies and boasting of public figures, so trump is very much a traditional figure. further, the whole notion of putting public administration in the control of people with the chief professional asset of lying convincingly surely assumes corruption as inevitable. when the result is a contest between trump and biden, you are not entitled to complain. you could get democracy, and open government, and peaceful foreign relations. but most don't want those things, they just want license to steal, as americans always have.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
back around 1900, corruption in state governments got so bad, that a 'progressive' movement 'democratized' several states- notably california, which could be a large and prosperous nation if independent. [ hint: it's called 'secede' ] modern progressives are nothing like that, the limit of their aspiration is a fairy god mother in office over them. but i digress.
it sounds like trump really is a traitor, as well as a conman. if so, it's president for life, or jail, unless he can slip out of the country and disappear.
but trump is not your main problem. a political system that let's such a creature near public office is hopelessly defective, from the point of view of sane and educated people. it was never meant to be anything but a tool of slave plantation grandees, although it has staggered along as a device of rule for wealth in general.
trump is not smart enough to be a dictator, but he might be a bridging face for pompeo or similar sociopaths with access to killers and bandits.
life is much more interesting lately, innit.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
if you had democracy, you could fix it. if you had democracy... but you don't. worse, no one seems to recognize this reality. a people with the power to decide, through referendum and, vitally, citizen initiative, become citizens, no longer just chumps.
the intelligentsia never talk about the glaring lack of democracy, because that might lead to a need, a demand, for action. and they get paid for talking, not shooting.
the people can empower themselves, if they can organize and act in concert. and yet they don't. when you are raised to be a slave, you never dream of being a citizen.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
prof wolff is not clear about the difference between democracy, and elective aristocracy. the usa is the latter.
once you make this blunder, further discussion is often futile, gossip in the slave quarters.
'demos kratia' is the greek from which english derives the word 'democracy.'
demos kratia literally means, 'the citizens rule.' aristotle thought this was a good idea, on balance.
democracy does not. not in the federal government of the usa. there 435 people rule 300 million - an oligarchy if ever there was one.
california would be a true democracy, if independent, and i often wonder why they don't secede. some usans know what democracy is, but can't be bothered to get it.
but we have elections! sorry, elections are not democracy, for you are deciding nothing except who will be your master for awhile.
why don't people want democracy? one reason is because you are told endlessly that you have it, in a modernized version where the hard work of decision is done for you. if you believe that, you are a child, or a natural slave. no manacles needed, just lies.
1
-
military is sacred--- great investment, great employment, wonderful marketing tool, and shooting the competition may keep foreigners in line.
ike gets credit for pointing out the obvious, but nothing came of it. munitions is the wet-dream investment, no contact with a real market limitation.
usa is beyond hope, should start over, but there is no consensus on what should be done, so nothing will be done. some nations decay from lack of intellectual resources, they simply do not respond to conditions around them. emigrate if you can, great opportunities in china, but even canada is a big step up.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
first, the usa is not a democracy. second, politicians don't support democracy, as it would make them extinct. third, americans are vaguely aware that voting for people is not useful, since candidates lie about their intentions and capabilities.
and that is why americans don;t vote.
many american states have democratic constitutions, california has referendum, initiative and recall, all effective and in use as required. that is democracy, and the federal government has none. so why is the word 'democracy' used as a label for the usg?
when you face reality, you can change it. if you want democracy, and don't have it, you can get it. but when you pretend you have democracy, and don't, then it's useless to complain about the results.
don't blame politicians for being parasites, low character is part of their job description. instead, blame the people who put up with politician rule.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
there is a myth, that usa is a nation of laws, not men. there is no foundation to this myth, beyond repeated lies and wishful thinking. the federal government of the usa is not a democracy, and never was, and never was intended to be. it is an elective aristocracy, with the aristocrats very dependent on their bankers and so very attentive to the banker's desires. that's how plutocracy works.
and that is why america's military is in constant use: not at war, just in use. it is a military in service to corporations on the direction of a government equally in service to wealth.
tg has made a career out of complaining that service men and women are being misused. in fact, they are not misused, she simply doesn't understand the goals of the nation. or refuses to say so, since that would quickly lead to revolution, or assassination.
the attack on iraq was war, and war-crime. all the activities of 'special forces' and drone bombs are simply banditry and murder. this has been clear for many years, so concern for military personnel is misguided- they are mercenaries, murderers in uniform. indeed, very often the plutocratic nature of the usa expresses itself in private armies, very evident in iraq.
1
-
1
-
1
-
usans live in fantasyland. trying endlessly to bend reality into a 'democracy' framework, when the actual frame of usa is a constitution explicitly written to prevent democracy.
endless headscratching, about why the nation treats most of the people badly, 'shouldn't democracy be kind to the people?' well, yes, it should. but, you hopeless idiots, you haven't got democracy! you never had democracy! you aren't meant to have democracy!
but, i have been dancing up and down for 50 years about that non-existence of democracy in usa. never penetrates.
i think european nations experience more variety in their history, and become more sophisticated. in usa, the children are told they have democracy, and they never recover.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
that's the way the usa began, property vote, black slavery, ethnic cleans..., no let's be frank, mass murder.
if you are at all surprised at how the usa turned out, just review how it started.
the poor are many in the usa, but not enough to change things, the middles are struggling but unwilling to raise the flag of rebellion, lest they lose what remains.
the rich are not frightened, yet, and have a private jet and a comfortable home in monaco in reserve.
so usa is going to boil for awhile. and don't get your hopes up, revolution is much less likely than military coup, anyway.
the education and general knowledge of americans should be enough to support a second 'progressive era.' the first installed democracy in many states, but failed at the federal level. usa could have won through to civilization, but something went wrong. the heritage of slavery probably at the core.
in any event, yer screwed. try not to blow up or burn down the world as you slide down the ratings ladder.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
you may not know, but speaking chinese is no big deal. not only are there lots, and lots, of chinese, but more, and more, non-chinese see it in their personal interest to speak mandarin, and the good news, it's easier than french, or even spanish.
simplest structure of any major language, very few anomalies, no sounds that are hard for english speakers.
tones? well, do yer best and they will probably understand, and smile politely. musical people will catch on, the rest of us just plod on.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
try to be optimistic? think about that.
homer sap is heading towards an environmental catastrophe and resulting population drop. this may be a good thing as far as racial survival goes. no guarantee, greed and arrogance rule the western nations, and i suspect asia is much the same. africa is already in post-catastrophe condition, thx to the 'developed' nations, but doubtless they will be driven lower.
and the orcs who drive usa national policy may add general war to the mix, to bolster their declining share of the global wealth.
trying to be optimistic is putting a bucket on yer head and chanting, "fdr will save us, from the grave, if we dance around it, singing songs of contrition."
there will be no salvation. individual survival may be possible, but walled villages with mgs and rfgs and internal water supply are the best bet. get far away from cities, those crazies in montana and idaho may turn out to be right.
1
-
1
-
1
-
laugh if you wish, but you are not citizens in a democracy. you are only civilians, members of society, but inferior to politicians, who make decisions about the nation.
when you consider the actions, words, personal history, of those politicians, why do you let them rule you?
by now you should have figured out that politicians are not your friends. they are concerned about their career, about their personal enrichment from their position, but you go on voting for them.
one is slightly less bad than another? that voting strategy guarantees that both will exploit you, both parties will sell you to the rich, as you can see.
so stop voting. a turn-out of 30% will discredit the winner.
then demand democracy. at gun-point.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
soul? usa? a contest between the great usa con man and the great usa political hack?
the crisis point for usa was its formation. only rhode island asked its people, who said. "no." the proportion of orcs to people has not improved since then. so plutocracy, slavery and ethnic cleansing were empowered and unleashed.
the rich still rule, invasions are 'liberation,' assassination is boasted of, coups commonplace, blockades and sanctions of nations who resist usa hegemony are called 'foreign relations,' and you talk of 'american soul?'
my granddaddy's pigpen had more souls than washington dc.
trump is no mutant, he is as american as apple pie, biden is no saviour, except very possibly to the share holders of big pharma and blue shield.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
there was no democracy in the usa, madison bragged about stamping it out. equality? and actual slavery? in fact, usa was as close to british aristocracy as madison could make it. he only participated in the revolution because british common law was making slavery legally impossible. otherwise, he was british aristo to his toes.
capitalism made no promises, it was just a label for licensing greed. it certainly didn't promise equality, but it allowed people to become rich by their own efforts, as well as by inheritance. a step forward, but a surprisingly small one. the rich mimicked the aristocrats and often married them to bring a title into the family.
wolff has tried to resuscitate the notion known as anarcho-sydicalism. there's a good reason the name and thing are not much seen these days. it doesn't work.
there are co-op workshops and small enterprises, the integral participation of labor unions in german indusrty is a stunted child of this ideal, but every where the state controls all smaller units of society, and a-s can never flourish.
which is where democracy should enter: the state manages, the electorate controls the state. a simple principle, even an academic can understand it. but democracy is hard, and as rare as a-s, or more so. easier to chase a unicorn if you are not going to catch it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
it seems usa history is not mentioned in usa schools anymore. a national army was regarded as the tool of kings, to oppress the people, and locally controlled militia was the means of resisting.
but people in the usa are told daily that they have democracy, 'done for you,' and they should submit to their 'democratically elected' masters.
of course, de santis is a local would-be nazi, but when you don't have democracy, refuse to admit that you don't have democracy, and don't even know what democracy is, choosing between submission to local nazis or national nazis, is a choice which is not pressing. making up your mind about chocolate vs strawberry ice cream seems more important.
1
-
1
-
1
-
trump personally is an almost pitiful figure. only in a degenerate society could such a defective human being find himself briefly in the oval office. monarchies have to put up with this problem, but elective oligarchies can at least hope for smart crooks.
but he was in office simply because the professional political caste is degenerate. crooked, self-serving, senile and entitled, and unable even to pretend to concern for public affairs.
all trump had to offer was braggdocio and a principle , 'not one of them' and that was enough. a visible dimwit with well-documented contemptible character, was at least, 'not one of them.'
and then you get a biden. i wonder when you will realize that you need a new constitution.
but it's too late for that, the next step is for some general to take over.
the sad truth is, societies are knit together, top to bottom, and weakness at the top is a measure of the character of the commoners. cattle are inevitably ruled and abused, because they can be.
1
-
there is a lot of talk, on the theme, "[scratching head] why doesn't my life continue unaffected by time, resources and accident. ?"
the answer is unwelcome: you have let politicians run the nation, for the welfare of the rich. it's worse- madison said he had wrote a constitution 'for the ages' which would ensure that politicians would run the nation, for the welfare of the rich. refer to: "those who don't know history are condemned to repeat it."
ignorance generates passivity, generates submission, as here in the usa, we see demonstrated not the first time im history.
i used to ask people, if they wouldn't prefer democracy. "of course!" you may think, but you would be wrong. many people think they have it, a triumph for diseducation, quite a few respond with a visible air of superiority, " heavens, no! that's just mob rule."
it comes to this: trump is no mistake. he's not even the worst president since ww2. the political system of the usa is mired in the mud of time, based on the arrogance of wealth, rotten with entitlement of great inherited fortunes, hobbled with the impotence of general ignorance resulting from poor education. and it will soon join the ranks of ustabees among nations. let us hope the rage of the disappointed doesn't bring widespread war.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"who decides?" said aristotle. smart guy. he nailed the key question of human societies. who's the boss?
the boss is the person with the gun. in a more generalized and larger society, who causes things to happen?
economists hate politics. powerful people or groups interfere with economists instructions, on how things should be done. politicians laugh at economists, and say, "do it my way, or i'll shoot."
there is a reason co-ops are rare and small, authoritarian businesses are intrinsically stronger. they have the law on their side. if you want a socialist economy, first you must get the gun, get a socialist political structure.
there is one, it's called 'democracy.'
until you have it, co-ops will be rare and small.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
saw an indian blog today, casually mentioned there had been religious lynchings in punjab a couple of days ago. reminded me of georgia, in the 50's, pruning uppity blacks. and now i learn anti-vaxxers think biden is dead [1], and nurses are witches.[2]
suddenly international relations seemed logical: nations like india and usa, peopled by mouth-breathing thugs with neither brains nor education, are naturally going to gang up on any more civilized people, because they only have violence as a tool. usa-india!
[1] this is illogical. why replace a real senile slimy fool with a false senile slimy fool? why not upgrade?
[2] whatever you think about nurses, keep it quiet. in everyone's life there comes a time when you are alone with a person that has powerful drugs in a nearby cabinet. and let's be practical, no one will miss you,
1
-
there is a large segment of the usa that follows trump, because he's not 'them,' the successful, educated people. the number of those 'us' is increasing, as the middles fall into poverty and discover they are no longer 'them.' trump would be easy to beat, a warren/klobuchar ticket with m4a would rolli n. but the dems are wholly owned by big money, biden has been on the prudential drip throughout his career. dnc would rather lose with biden. they might have to strip back a few phone answerers, but the drip would continue.
usans deserve no better. evolution works on societies just as on species, and usa is on the way out. ignorant societies just can't run as fast as smart ones, patriotic elites vitalize their nation, selfish elites enervate their nation. a nation born to preserve slavery and empower wealth has no claim on sympathy, large and small scale murder and theft do not burnish the brand.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
it's not just jews vs muslims, israelis vs palestinians.
it's also the evil empire maintaining a client state in the middle east. vietnam, iraq, afghanistan, and currently ukraine are all part of empire-building, lately with money rather than soldiers.
they are trying to include taiwan in the program, but that could really blow up.
usg doesn't care, they are just cynical careerists who will be far away and richer when things get bloody.
i feel a little sorry for young people. they are a generation who will watch human society collapse, painfully.
plenty of blame to go around, but the top of the list should be the usa. khomeini was laughed at when he characterized usa as 'the great satan,' but he saw clearly, even if his language was unfashionable.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
'fails to save us' is the key phrase. who is going to save you? no one. in a democracy, the people [i call them citizens ] act to save themselves. they are the ruling class.
but usa is not a democracy. no one seems to realize this, which makes political discussion inconsequential. some do, naturally, but they take the view that 'nothing to be done', so ignore the gorilla at the dining table.
in future, keep an eye open for the use of passive voice constructions, an immediate tip-off that you are wasting your time.
no one is going to save you, your mother doesn't rule, anymore than you do. those who do rule are happy with the system, although constantly looking for more power and consequent bigger bribes.
get democracy, nothing else matters.
1
-
as long as you talk about the economic system, you lose. america's problem is that it is an oligarchy, not a democracy. the problem is political, not economic. solution simple: get democracy. use citizen initiative to reshape the nation.
the reason you don't have democracy is because madison wanted the rich to rule, and wrote his constitution to exclude democracy. he was successful. his great success is that you don't know this, and you think if you wish hard enough, a fairy godmother will fix things for you. sorry, there are none, and if you don't have the intelligence and character to be a citizen of democracy, then you must be a civilian in an oligarchy. that never works well for the civilians, it has always worked well for the elite.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
they didn't overwhelm the hospitals in china. they had flatpack hospitals on tap, and up in a week. but that's planning for you. mericans wouldn't know about that, since they only plan to survive the next week at one end, and add another million at the other end.
see the w.h.o. report, led by a canadian doctor, who thought all had been done that could be done, in china.
meanwhile, with 2 months warning in the land of the free, little has been done, aside from assertions that we will be 'back in business by easter.'
voting for trump was a good idea, in principle, but it turns out kicking the democratic party in the face was useless. like giving a life-saving shot of adrenaline to a mummy.
revolution also useless. best bet is to move to the west coast and secede. with good skills and c.v, keep going, oz and nz better than california, and no immediate worry from the 'special forces.'
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
you deserve no better. you've heard about democracy, they have a good democratic constitution in california, and a few other states, but you tolerate a constitution written by a couple of slave masters to protect their plantations, and wealth in general. seems to me, a nation that accepts plutocracy should give up whining and pretend they like poverty.
there are no honest politicians, and i include aoc. you go to work in a brothel, you sell your body, in congress, gotta throw in your honor as well. no loss, in most cases.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
many people equate 'democratic' with 'good' as a special kind of good particular to the political world. wrong.
a democracy is a particular kind of nation, specially characterized by the rule of the citizens. not by kings, not by generals or colonels, not by politicians. the word 'democracy' is an erosion by english-speakers of a greek phrase 'demos kratia.' which simply means, the citizens [hold the] power. not politicians, etc.
a democracy is not necessarily a kind place, and saying 'all institutions are democratic' is a nonsense.
in a democracy, only one institution is 'democratic,' and that one is the state.
in our world, a democracy would be characterized by a constitution which states that the electorate are the masters of the nation, and directs the nation, through a process now called 'referendum*' and the citizens must be informed of all questions of public import. finally, and crucially, there must be an effective and accessible power of citizen initiative, to mobilize action when the public servants fail in their duty.
their are no democracies except helvetia, and that one needs tolerance to hold the label.
so, is democracy impossible? i suspect prof wolff thinks so, he never talks about democracy in a nation. and democracy in the workplace truly is a nonsense. co-ops are certainly possible, but that has nothing to do with democracy.
i think it's 'impossible' too. there are little flickers of democracy here and there, but oligarchy seems to be the limit of our capabilities.
one reason for the limitation is ignorance: no one ever told you what democracy was. but now you know. do you want it?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
every so often someone inadvertently shines a light on the internals of usa society. the view is commonly stomach-turning, it's basically a giant pustule with a once-shiny coat of paint, now worn off in many places.
can't expect any better, the nation was born to protect and extend african slavery, coyly hiding behind talk of 'indenture.' the founding fathers were distinguished by brutality, hypocrisy and arrogance, white-washed into pioneers of ethical humanity.
and it hasn't changed, as the constitution flash-froze the attitudes and laws of the time.
no democracy in it, nor ever will be, if you look at the abject submissives that live there now.
not sure why your masters want abortion control. perhaps the attitudes of arrogance common in rich people require dominance of the sexual machinery that will produce a son.
no matter, there is so much wrong with usa that this matter is not particularly pressing. just one aspect of dysfunctional society that threatens the survival of our species.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
this is useless. if you start with the notion that usa, or anywhere, used to be a democracy, then nothing you say can be relied on. usa in particular, was explicitly designed to be an oligarchy at birth, and one in service to the rich. the structure remains the same, and sure enough, so does the economic distribution.
no magic involved, all done publicly. sustained by lies, one of which is that 'rule by politicians is democracy, a new, improved version, done for you so you don't have to think.'
it seems no one teaches actual history any more, and very possibly sustained lying by teachers has created a nation of ignorant idiots.
but here is simple reality:
'democracy' comes from a greek phrase meaning 'the citizens rule.' it does not mean the politicians do it for you.
you can tell a democracy - the activity of the state is directed by referendum and initiative. this happens in california, and a few other states, does not happen in the federal nation. why not? because madison sold his constitution to the constitutional convention, and set oligarchy in stone.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
this is not rocket science, sheeple: wealth and power are conjoined twins, and if power is narrowly held, so is wealth. madison knew this, and put all power in the hands of a few hundred elected officials. his purpose was simple, he was himself rich, and wanted to ensure that the taxes of the rich were not spent on the poor. and that is why the usa is an oligarchy, not a democracy.
there will be no change in the distribution of wealth unless the wealthy are threatened by angry mobs. but a professional army can deal with mobs, very often.
the only long-term solution is getting democracy. when power is dispersed, so will wealth be. but this 'solution' requires citizen quality people. people raised in an oligarchy are generally not of this quality, and not every story ends 'happily ever after.
carter has aged well, and perhaps he regrets some of the things he felt he had to do to be president. but he lost my respect when he exonerated the murderers of mylai. a trivial matter, compared to the body count rolled up by every other president, but an indication that there are no good politicians, and we should make them extinct.
1
-
1
-
there are no rights, not supported by force. when the ruling elite has command of army and police, the people can only have privileges. these are activities they may perform for as long as their masters find convenient.
if you want rights, you must establish democracy, and support it with citizen militia, instead of a professional military.
gabbard is just another would-be dictator, "vote for me, and i will take care of you." a standard sales pitch.
save your loyalty for someone who wants to organize the people to be masters of their nation, citizens of democracy.
of course, if you realize you are incapable of citizenship, from lack of education and character, then seek a big shark to affix your lips.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
selective quotes of trump create the feeling that he is smarter than his generals. they are losers, to some extent. but they didn't lose alone, political considerations limited their success. nowadays, america's 'wars' are not wars, they are optional wars, or in antique language: banditry in uniform.
trump appears genuinely dim, but so did dubya. his war was a real disaster, but at least usa remains in possession of iraq.
the management selection process of the usa is hopelessly obsolete, that's why it's decaying. no one in the usa seems to understand this, and that's why it's decaying also. somewhat like the last days of the austro-hungarian empire, let us hope the collapse is equally fast and smooth.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
does biden run usa? unlikely. but whoever is calling the shots is no patriot. they are protecting wealth corporate and private, at whatever cost.
bad luck for the serfs, but their control over public affairs is nil. ironic in view of the continual reference to 'democracy.' which they have never had, the elite having grasped the principle of newspeak and doublethink way ahead of orwell.
there is no 'good guy' in this struggle, but prc is being directed for the improvement of the nation, with visible and remarkable results. doubly admirable since being accomplished in the face of fear and hatred from the evil empire and its clients.
will they win? good guys always win, since winners define good guys.
virtue has little place in human affairs. 20 years from now, the struggle may still be visible, if nuclear warfare is avoided.
alas, usa has demonstrated a willingness to exterminate cities, russia and prc will certainly strike back.
interesting times...
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
this story is simply not true. usa has been evil from birth. there was a brief flurry of vaguely socialist response after the '29 collapse. that was erased or squeezed gradually, in the 60's and 70's.
usa is not a democracy. there is voting, but it achieves nothing. purely symbolic.
populism is what happens when elite rule is threatened. token efforts to relieve the pain felt by the populace.
it is intended to prevent demand for actual democracy. and it usually works. the cattle do not have the time, energy, or education to organize revolution, and the discontented middle class only wants enough change to be comfortable themselves.
so, almost always, human society describes the same trajectory, ending in decay and collapse. usa has entered the decay phase, but don't get your hopes up, that military establishment will sustain the empire for a long time, and will become the internal ruler soon. the political system is degenerate and can not function any longer.
a 'trump' and a 'biden' appearing in the executive office should demonstrate this reality to anyone.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
usa is hobbled with a political structure designed for stasis, and incidentally, corrupt in its inherent function: money buys politics, and secretly, too.
usa is unlikely to participate in bri, it would be a catastrophic loss of face, and might not be admitted, due to the moral danger of associating with the great satan.
so poverty will increase, 'nazification' will flourish, and a competent dictator will lead usa to nuclear extinction of life on earth, with the rest of the world helpless to prevent.
memo to young people: if you want a different future history, get busy!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
you don't build the base, you can't have the tower. "you can't get there from here."
mr h makes a living from talking, but he doesn't have any answers, because he, and you, have no power to do. you need a revolution, you need a plan for a better society, to recruit followers to revolution, and you got neither.
instead, you are trying to make this broken clock-work train perform as though it was whole, and a real train. and you, and he, are pretending you are real grown-up citizens, when you are only civilians, permanent political adolescents.
sorry, gotta break the bubble, no matter how scary.
1
-
1
-
1
-
in a way, the prospect of trump on the bridge as usa copes with cv19, oncoming economic recession/collapse, and continuing story of china taking the lead in science, engineering, and foreign relations is a very comforting view. who better to carry the disgrace of inadequate management? if the disparagement of climate crisis results in near-extinction, isn't it better that trump becomes the boogeyman?
usa is going to slide down the ladder rapidly, as corruption and gross over-spending on munitions have gutted schools, public health and community cohesiveness. the utter lack of public interest in important matters is natural, given the structure of society, but it makes proper allocation of funds and planning quite impossible. not a great problem by itself, 'great' britain manged to step off the top tier without disaster, but how can usa turn off the tap to munitions production without enraging both generals and plutocrats? war and/or military coup seems inevitable.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
capitalism is just a polite word for greed, commonly used when greed is industrialised.
it's easy to lose faith in, as there is neither god nor experience behind it.
but it is supported by rich liars, so rich that they can hire strong support.
people have to start from basic principles, to break through the lies. then they are confronted by naked force, police, army, assassins. prospects of change appear dim.
revolution is not impossible, and a web age can muster such large numbers that resistance crumbles. if, that is, there are large numbers who demand change. in my experience, talking is the limit of exertion. fear, laziness or ignorance is the first and strongest defense of the elite.
homer sap is unlikely to survive much longer, as the elite will eat the world.
1
-
1
-
1
-
aristotle wrote a book, about political structures then visible in the world around him. he concluded that the essential element in labeling and analyzing a polity was, "who decides?" if the people decide, then that society was a 'democracy,' which was from a greek phrase which meant 'the people rule.'
smart man. there were lots of democracy examples around, in his day, left over from the primacy of athens. but all had fallen under the control of other political systems, monarchy in various forms. democracy has been popular ever since, but only as an aspiration of those enduring some form of elite rule.
while elites hate democracy, and used to say so, they have come to see the utility of labeling their rule as a variety of democracy, an improved version that requires no effort or actual power of the people. just put an adjective in front of democracy, and tell the cattle to relax, 'we'll take care of you.'
that is america, today. any number of americans think being allowed to choose which politicians shall rule them is all there is to democracy. a clear demonstration that orwell's warning about thought control through language manipulation fell on deaf ears
.
capitalism is not failing, it does what it always does, seeking profit. what has failed is humanity's capacity to control capitalism through political means. the result looks like being the death of the ecosystem, and very possible mass extinction.
we need democracy, and socialism. it may be too late, but it is pointless not to struggle to bring exploitation of nature down to survival levels.
1
-
power and wealth are bound together. so disperse the power [democracy, for short] and spread the wealth. madison knew that, and didn't want it, and the grandees of post-revolutionary usa agreed with him. so,,, "we, the people..." except the people had nothing to do with it, most of the people had no vote.the constitution began with a lie, and society founded on lies must rot, as other lies are made to cover the early lies. the rot is all around you. i marvel that you can live with the smell. how exquisitely appropriate that soon you all will be covering yer noses. all the survivors, that is.
1
-
i used to do that. but the democrat/ic party has no ideology, it is simply a device to transfer money from voter to politician. you could call them red or blue, as the accompanying charts and drawings often do.
i intended a slur, but it was useless , whores are not bothered by phrases like, 'easy virtue.'
water off a duck's back.
and it's not really fair to despise politicians, or whores. we all have to make a living, and until there is a 'universal living allowance,' then anything goes.
of course, if you must despise someone, choose politicians, they always lie and steal , honest working girl is perfectly possible.
but think about this: someone invented democracy, yet you go on supporting rule by politicians. maybe the weak link is you.
1
-
nato is a military pact, aimed at ussr, and now, russia. it has advanced by buying governments, simply bribing officials to sell their nations to usa commercial interests.
this commercial war has rolled up to russia border.
putin finally decided 'too far,' and went for the gun. think of him as a much-beaten wife, who decided to shoot the bastard.
will he succeed? quien sabe? but unlike the last two usa 'leaders,' he appears to be sane and well-informed.
would ukraine, the whole society, be better off as an independent buffer state?
very likely. since it came under the control of billionaires, ukraine has become the poorest nation in europe.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
the underlying problem is the usa hand in the japanese puppet. the current, and usual japanese government, feels strong enough to threaten prc because of the usa hand on their shoulder. but this aggression is fragile, being utterly dependent on usa support, and possibly on usa demands. which makes it possible for russia to remind japan that dreams of a greater east asia co-prosperity sphere were just dreams then, much more so now.
i would feel sorry for the japanese people, who are continually endangered by right-wing nutters in government, except that there are elections, and the right wing nutters usually win. these are the people that led japan to destruction in ww2, and being usa sock-puppet will not save japan from prc strikes if the bluster turn hot.
the modi government, is doing much the same, acting as usa surrogate to win votes at home, while risking general war with prc.
in my view, politician rule is threatening racial extinction. those are real rockets and real bombs. and threatening russia and/or prc is not going to end well.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
america has a right-wing/racist problem? who knew?!
just about everyone, outside usa. and many inside.
spent some time in mississippi, in my salad days, saw the 'colored folks' lining up to go to their 'separate but equal' facilities, which weren't equal to begin with, and read about the occasional murders of 'uppity' coloreds.
folks, usa was born to protect slavery, and protected the thuggery of white nazis from the day of emancipation.
and it wasn't just ignorant southron good ol' boys neither. bush family had to leave connecticut after ww2, as it was filled with rich jews who resented their support for the nazis, and could do something about it. so bushes became texians, bought big hats and 'spreads', so they fitted right in.
of course, florida has their own little colony of right wing quasi-nazis, fugitives from castro revolution. calle ocho will be right behind the candidacy of ron desantis.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
unfortunately, americans have been bred for dumb and beautiful. most are just dumb. a few are dumb and beautiful, and front fox news.
came across a copy of chomsky's 'requiem for the american dream' last week, and thought that it should be the core text of civics course in every american high school. but apparently, if you don't get approval by the texas state school board, you can't sell your book. chomsky is not well regarded in texas.
folks, politicians are not your friends. if you were a wildebeest, they are hyenas. fire them, run the place yourself. used to be called 'democracy.' probably too hard for you, but if you don't try, you don't know.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
hard to take a long view in a society that manages politics as a celeb dance contest. is there no [ would-be ] citizen action group trying to establish democracy in usa? the thing about democracy is, instead of ennobling politicians with your vote, you vote on laws, policies, plans, even peace or war. politicians optional, better without.
you are talking about two men being in contention for the role of king protemps, and both should never have any power over a puppy- and you know it, and do nothing.
usa is a nation born shameless, and not viisbly improved with time. forcible indenture is gone, but for profit prisons restored the moral balance. ethnic cleansing is gone, but casual banditry and murder abroad restores the balance again. european tourists in the 1800's report habitual lying and boasting in public officers, et voila: trump.
madison boasted he had created a plutocracy 'for the ages,' and indeed, he appears to have flash-frozen the national character.
1
-
usa was born to support slavery, and the subjection of indigenous peoples. it was born to provide a means for the rich to rule the many. usa is what it is, by design. one result is a populace of crazy people,
gun violence arises from insanity, and would be 'sword violence', or 'club violence' if guns were not available.
guns are available, so that ordinary people can resist oppressive government. a good idea at the time, but obsolete. the guns are there for a good purpose, perverted by an oligarchic rule.
resistance to government oppression now can only be done by getting democracy, and making government extinct. replaced with administration directed by referendum and initiative. 'of, by and for the people' will greatly reduce the incidence of insanity.
but that is too hard. so we'll pretend to attack the problem by ignoring the oligarchy, and resulting insanity, and blaming guns.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
stop laughing, it ain't funny.
the funny part is, they get away with this because they own the government, and the cattle let them.
i choose 'cattle' because the situation is very like the relation between wildebeest and hyenas: the wildebeest don't like being killed and eaten, and they wouldn't be -they have horns and hooves - but they don't defend one another, they let the hyena gang knock over 'someone else.'
in usa everyone but family, is 'someone else.'
democracy is possible, but very difficult, it needs a sense of community lacking in usa. so you have people making a living laughing at corruption and oppression, when a sane society would revolt, and establish democracy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
no erosion, the establishment of israel was a process of 'buy, frighten, shoot.' from the beginning. the intent was to build a jewish state, current occupants, largely muslim would have to leave.
with near-success, the jewish bandits have started to white-wash their elders. 'this was always israel, we just took it back." if this principle was followed everywhere, the last human standing would feel he had to shoot himself in the head.
and it suits the usa to assist. for no cost, in principle, the politicians get large chunks of usa jewish money for their election expenses, and their grandchildren's university fees.
it was an invasion, it is an invasion, and israel has located itself on a bomb-sight.
no immediate danger, middle east nations have been too busy dealing with cia plots, ethic hatred and historical violence, and no one is capable of troubling israeli military..
1
-
1
-
buttigieg deserves praise. smart, capable of reasonable discourse in well-structured sentences, with a shout-out to god, he is a veritable philosopher king compared to american politicians of either party. have heard him compared to obama, which struck me as a good comparison. but by now even americans must realize that obama was an empty suit with a smooth line of chatter.
tg has gone on a different path: usa is a bandit nation. not an easy path, eh? just the truth, and it deserves to be heard. but tg has not much to offer outside this moral whistleblowing. worse, she is fronting for hindu right-wing nasties, who seem to think there is room in american politics for a hindu equivalent to aipac. i hope this isn't going to catch on, but usa is very likely to embrace these crazies, as a counter-weight to rising chinese power and influence. might want to look elsewhere for sanity in american foreign policy. give some time to andrew yang- not as slick as buttigieg but even smarter. may be too smart for american voters, most of whom can barely spell, much less evaluate a. i. and the need for citizen salary.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
there are various kinds of nations. usa is a flop house for about half, a nation for about 40%, and one of several addresses for the rich. all of it belongs to the rich, but most is of sol little consequence that a site manager has to identify himself to owner when he calls.
healthcare is not any kind of issue in usa. it's something you do yourself. your life doesn't matter, health even less.
there is no resistance to the rule of the rich. a nation filled with guns, a right guaranteed for the express purpose of resisting oppression by government or gangs, can not raise a revolution while half are still eating, and don't care about those who aren't. 2nd amendment didn't deliver, but might yet. just needs more hungry/angry people, at least the guns are there.
'our national security infrastructure?' who is this 'our,' whiteman? it belongs to bezos, gates and their hired agents, trump and mnuchin. your security is just a good lock on the door.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
once you grasp the real fact, that the head of the cia may not be working for the welfare of the nation, then it becomes useful, even necessary, to seek information from foreign sources. their intelligence may have dirt on american politicians, that usa agencies do not have, or more likely, are holding to extort performance from that politician.
trump is an outsider. he will never know anything from cia, that is not given him to benefit cia. true of any politician, but trump is unpredictable, until the intelligence 'deep state' gets some extortion power on him. this should be easy, and we are currently watching the process unfold.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
in reality, your problem is a guy named james madison. he wrote the constitution, designed to ensure the rich ruled, and it has worked very well indeed, to that purpose. trump has two assets, enough in 2016: member of the richman's club, always useful, nearly necessary, and not a politician, uniquely useful, just this one time. the reason for that: professional politicians have run the usa so badly that a lot of people figured 'anyone but more of them.'
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
the depressing element of american political life, is the apparent lack of self-awareness. america is as close to plutocracy as you can get, in western history, only the roman senate of republican days is more formal. yet there is continual reference to american 'democracy.' if it were an elite plot to use double-think, it could not be more effective as a pacification device. but i think it is more likely just colonial boasting, at replacing the british aristocracy [with limited monarchy] with american aristocracy and a limited, elective, monarch.
the usa is a plutocracy. and everything in america is imbued with a reverence for money. a simple example: the current election process will choose a king-for-awhile. discussion of the process has two aspects. how many people say they will support each candidate- and how much money each candidate has to buy attention. plutocracy, from the ground up. from the top down aspect is obvious: someone named bloomfield decided he would like to be president, spent a few hundred million dollars, and a few weeks later is polling better than all but two or three. at what point do you say, "we are a plutocracy?"
please stop talking about 'democracy now.' you pollute the word. you muddy an ideal that humanity desperately needs to realize. you legitimize all the venal hyenas who 'lead' society with lies. even 'democracy tomorrow' would be a similar lie, for no one in the usa says a word about how to get, what they assure one another they already have.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
good luck. but things were tougher back in the 1930's, and token efforts were done to stave off revolution, economy saved only by ww2. so long as you don't have democracy, and you don't, gains will be illusory and temporary. the rich will always buy back the government, one politician at a time. need a new constitution, folks: it should start off by saying "we, the citizens of the usa are masters of our nation, and all public activity is done by our consent through referendum and initiative."
ojeda may pass for a good man, i suppose, but he made a career out of shooting up people whose crime was resisting the government of the usa. truly good people would have been shooting at the government.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
biden will not fix things. he will be the face of usa aggression against china. i suppose prc will continue to establish trade, through individual treaties and any groups they can form or join. that is the pragmatic response to usa military threats. recent asean treaty a good sign, but there must be more.
a few european nations have signaled interest in joining bri, and more is needed.
in the long term, if their is one, helping african nations develop can be the most important move, moving them into global balance beside china will be decisive.
but will usa start shooting first? defense treaties with iran, venezuela, cuba and pakistan would be logical, and the loan of a few ballistic missiles from china might well put the usa on the path to peace, if not virtue.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
a good presentation , but times have changed since nixon: there is currently a much wider perception that both parties are moral degenerates. so trump supporters can hear his sins, and be unembarrassed, 'he may be a creep, but so is your guy, and this one is ours.'
democracy is the cure for what ails america, but it turns out that americans are not citizen-quality people. anomie is the label, i call it the sicilian disease. so it's more of the same for the usa, tailing off into military rule of each of the rump survivor states- westcoastia, northeastia, and bubbaland.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
india is one of many nations, still in the grip of religion. mostly muslim, nowadays, hinduism confined to india, but that is a big confinement, some christian nations still pay attention to god. and the jews are rabid in their defense of religion and nation, being surrounded by enemies who have very good reason to hate them.
but there are many secular nations, sometimes nominal. they have problems too.
humanity seems too stupid to survive.
we have real problems, arising from over-population of the planet. survival needs planning and action, directed by intellect, and our masters are only interested in getting and staying in office. sometimes through election, sometimes through a cosy understanding with the military, occasionally through claimed appointment by god.
not good enough, we can see the sand castles they have built being destroyed by the tide of time.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
sensible, for a change. putin is levels ahead of the management usa and uk are getting nowadays.
usa doesn't need good management, because their game-plan is simply, 'get more, of everything, using threats, bribes, actual murder and invasion.' a monkey could run it.
putin doesn't have the assets of usa, but great natural resources and threat of nuclear war are sufficient to support resistance to usa.
he is showing signs of stress and it may be shaping his activity, but no matter: he will have some success or die trying, possibly killing many others as necessary.
interesting times.
1
-
1
-
interesting times, but trump biden or bernie matters less than you think. usa is over-stressed and collapse is built in to the economy, climate crisis not being addressed and a slightly out of the ordinary plague may deliver the final hammer blow to the american imperium.
if you look at the american political system and recent history from a distance [i am as far as i could get] it truly looks medieval and without the saving grace of energy. just look at the fact that 3 tired old men have come to the fore, none with any record of achievement, nor do the parties show any vigor, or concern for anything but power.
the american republic is exhausted. its reach is imperial already, but there is no room for growth, decay is everywhere visible and the struggle for productive activity has left the house, last seen on a ship for china.
in truth, the next session in the oval office is better left to trump. he is a vile person, let him wear the accusations for what is coming to america.
1
-
trump is a cartoon character, but usa is a cartoon nation. very strong on cartoon characters, and very backward on social evolution. cv19 is god's comb, and i wonder what will fall out of that golden comb-over. has the usa ever had such a blatantly vain and arrogant buffoon in office before? in my lifetime, there has been no one so visibly in contempt of the people who put him in office. rightly so, of course, he knows better than anyone how defective he is, and still the people's choice. this is fundamentally a condemnation of the democratic party. if you can't beat a trump, you are far gone in corruption and incompetence. i marvel at the faces meeting trump this time, still a crew of the walking dead, and poor bernie- hasn't got a functioning socialist party, and wanted really badly to be president. i would liken him to a virgin come to a whorehouse with a mission to reform, except that yer average sex worker is a better person than anyone in the dnc, and all that's gonna happen is that one of the regular workers is gonna be picked, i hope, or bernie gets his heart broken. fronting for this party is a forlorn hope.
1
-
small town cop is one step up from mall guard. they ain't, in general, sas retirees.
the mass shootings will continue, symptomatic of severely alienated people in a society where rich and poor can enjoy 'freedom.' freedom for the rich works well, for others, not so much.
the coppers are alienated too - 'hey, i could get dead, or ruined here, and for what?'
james madison set usa on this course, he was very frank: the rich would direct the proposed 'usa,' to prevent the many from taxing them. and his constitution delivered that result. elective oligarchy in service to the rich is functional plutocracy.
get a new constitution, this one is malignant. i recommend one establishing democracy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
who is the boss, in the us? in a democracy, the answer is simple: the citizens, acting in concert to carry out their will expressed in referendum or initiative. but the usa is not a democracy, and the answer boils down to, who will the army obey? often how many will obey, a, b, or c?
the usa constitution is a contemptible hold-over from a powdered wig age, written to make sure the be-wigged enjoyed the fruits of slavery. they dispersed power hoping for stasis, madison was perfectly aware slavery was on the way out- but not in his life-time if his constitution could prevent it.
and now the shameful mess is in your hands, and every american can not detect the smell, but can see the seams of society pulling apart. much headscratching, but little understanding of the nature of your heritage.
1
-
in '71, i decided to emigrate. mutual relief, very likely. but i recommend it, to anyone with a portable trade or profession- enzed is best, as they have turned away from the usa. not paradise, but civilized. usa, otoh, is mired in greed and selfishness, and thinks nothing of murder, raids and military occupation in search of money. vietnam cured me of mycountrytisofthee psychosis, but there are plenty of other examples- chomsky keeps a list.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
i am convinced that humanity can only survive if we establish democracy widely, since it is visibly clear that elite rule creates sociopathic rulers. threat of war and now climate catastrophe comes with them.
prc is about as far from democracy as you can get, without lapsing into psychotic society. even so, i find myself agreeing with their government, in its struggle with the usa. in spite of the pretense to democracy, usa is, in fact, psychotic. a danger to us all.
and there is nothing to be done, no cure. we must walk a tight-rope between submission, and triggering nuclear war. 'we,' of course, is primarily the managers of prc.
i'm sure xjp takes great satisfaction in being the current great helmsman. but, how well does he sleep?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
playing politics will always win. that is the nature of the usa. depressing, but reality. if the administrators of usa [public service] put before the electorate a referendum on medicare for all, it would romp in. but the usa is not a democracy, and the people of the usa are too dim, or too selfish, to want democracy. many think they have it, poor souls. many don't want democracy, because it would lead to 'socialism!' [gasp] so there will be no referendum, certainly, and no medicare for all, until aoc is joined by hundreds like her. then they have to get the senate. then the supreme court. no law against hope, but the smart money is on madison:
madison was proud of his constitution. he bragged about it, saying it would ensure the rule of the rich, would prevent democracy from happening, would stop the taxes of the rich being spent on the poor. he was entitled to brag- 230 years later it was still delivering for the rich.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
nations with democracy have citizen initiative, those without have riots.
riots may loosen the grip of the rich, but only a little, and temporary. but that deals with mobs. actual change needs organization, planning, and a militia. no sign of visible thought, just rage, so the downward path will continue.
there's a big difference- protesters are obeying the rules, and frighten no one. rioting and looting inspire fear in the middle class who support the rulers, this has often caused trouble for rulers, so trump is threatening 'vicious dogs,' and no desert for dinner.
if usans were citizen quality people, they would have demanded democracy long ago, but they're not, so the cops will go on murdering people, and the politicians will incite war to cover their crimes at home. i've lived in china, and the usa, and there are many differences- chinese cops don't carry guns, and the people are not burning down cities.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
your country doesn't need you, its just a place on the map.
your nation is not yours, except in the sense that a cow might say 'this is my field, while master wants me to eat here.'
the swiss own their nation, it is a democracy. usa is not, and you don't.
while you are willing to be cattle, listen to people like tg, who promises you green grass, if you make her a master.
or you could organize, arm yourselves- that is the purpose of the 2nd amendment- and establish democracy, to lift yourself from cattle to citizen.
you don't need more politicians, you need more courage.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
if you are struggling to survive, it is bad news to hear there are additional people with superior skills in the market. it is sensible to exclude them from the market, because they are too tall, or too brown. this wouldn't matter too much if everyone was going to survive, but that kind of society is labeled 'socialist,' and it is too tall or too brown, if you are greedy. i'm pretty sure humanity is too dim to survive, simply because greed leads inexorably to war, famine, disease and resource depletion. resource depletion may say us from environmental collapse, but current indicators say, 'not in time.'
1
-
the wind won't change while the usg can use force or bribery to stop change. it's a shame usa is not a democracy, citizen initiative could stop the suicidal greed of the usa elite. but it isn't. by design. madison made a nation that could be ruled by wealth, and the design continues to work well.
pr. wolff won't change the wind, he's only an economist, not a magician.
i think this matter is beyond human control. 'if usa were a democracy....' the people could stop it. but it isn't, and no one wonders why it isn't. that is profound idiocy, genetic in nature. so the juggarnaut will roll on to ultimate destruction, of the nation, and the world.
we are not only watching history unfold nowadays, there is a lively element of potential extinction riding with national decay. not merely, "interesting times," we have graduated to "fascinating times."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
there is only one tool available to americans. it's crude, its unappealing, it needs patience. you must stop voting. at the same time, you should email your normally supported party saying, "we're through." tell your friends, ask them to do the same. put the democratic party out of business. out of this scorched earth, will appear new parties, i hope some will set getting democracy as their premier goal. this is your only hope.otherwise, it's slavery or revolution.
you must become a citizen of a democracy, playing an equal role in directing public affairs. if you allow any group to 'do it for you,' they will do it for themselves.
if you haven't figured that out by now, pray for saints to enter politics. hasn't worked in the past, but if you keep hammering your head, maybe it will be fun, in time.
1
-
good news. now fire 90% of the military, and become civilized.
seems unlikely, powerful elites do their best to hold power, and force the rest of the world to serve them.
as economic dominance fades, military dominance will be used to sustain the wealth, private and corporate, of the usa elite. or so the history of homer sap indicates.
as i read about the activity of the usg, i marvel that such dim, ignorant and selfish people should 'lead' the world's super power. although, you have to wonder if the surface of usa political society has any particular program in mind, beyond preening and posturing in the news of the world.
whatever the economic and military strength of the usa, the intellect and character of those 'leaders' seem more like the decadence of louis 16th france.
1
-
1
-
the whole history of the usa is the struggle of a few rich people to control the not- rich many, without relying greatly on force. madison knew what he was doing in the design of the constitution, and it continues to perform that function.
but it's a different world, and new stresses are going to rupture the constitutional framework of the nation. de-industrialization has created a large group of newly poor people no longer fooled by the democratic party. pursuit of global dominance has created an army aware that it is a tool of capitalist greed, and so not inhibited by any nostalgic loyalty to nation. keeping control of these social elements is increasingly difficult, and has led to desperado tactics, as both parties try to pretend that the relict america of the 1950's is essentially preserved.
trump is the 'desperado' of the right, a person so contemptible that he could only be elected, narrowly, because the newly impoverished americans despised clinton even more, and the hopelessly corrupt democratic party chose her for a candidate without even suspecting they were more despised.
biden will be the 'desperado' of the dems, he is a democrat, which is the only qualification he has, and it is enough- he authenticates the party, they can tell themselves they don't stink, trump was just a random obstruction. if trump beats him, a new party will be born. although, good sense doesn't get much play in usa politics, the horses might return to the burning barn. not sure horses are that stupid, americans, very possible.
'bernie?' he would lead the new party, but he's too old. if he is selected by the dems, unlikely, and wins, possible, he will preside over an unmanageable government, and carry the can of resulting failure.
1
-
1
-
i wish bernie would talk about getting democracy. fdr talked like bernie talks, and what he accomplished was largely wiped out by the patient application of money to the political system. only democracy can make changes that last, and only democracy can make empty promises obsolete.
the problem is, americans don't believe in democracy, because they think they have it, and it doesn't work, for them. but you don't have it, and that's why it doesn't work.
the only promise you need to hear, and make real, is the establishment of effective and accessible citizen initiative. that is the foundation of real democracy, and with it you can make america be what the people want it to be.
so don't get your hopes too high, bernie is offering a bandaid, and your nation has bone cancer.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
get democracy. or, if you are dim, or lazy, or fearful, or simply ignorant, relax and turn the channel to soothing music and prancing maidens.
the evidence of your subjection is daily rubbed in your eye, but nothing inspires action.
that was the evil genius of james madison. he created a choice, submission or revolution, with a high threshold of pain, to protect the rule of wealth.
usa is not yet at the revolution level, not even close. just at the whining level. a matter of mild interest, but time is not unlimited. decisions must be made about climate action, and your masters will not act time to prevent mass death.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
the american revolution was not 'progressive.' it was a device to save slavery from british judges, who were making it uneconomic through common law decisions. usa is a plutocracy, and every elite in history uses its power to get more, and give less. the shift of wealth from the 70's to now is a second 'gilded age,' and perfectly natural, it is the default condition created by the constitution. it was no accident that slave plantation plutocrats were 4 of the first 5 presidents, neither is trumps accession to power- the politician caste is so crooked and unconcerned about national justice that a political sabot was thrown into the list of presidents, simply because he was an outsider.
the political structure of the usa began rotten, by common notions of justice, and has gotten worse: 3 people are reputed to command half the wealth of the usa, and there is no sign of rebellion.
there is some ferment in the democratic party, and hope arises. don't get excited- there was more, much more ferment in the 1930's, but fdr put out the fire with some make-work programs. wouldn't have worked for long, but ww2 saved the plutocracy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
there are not 'so-called,' they are your actual morality police.
iran was a civilized place, with a secular parliament, until the leader said to the evil empire of the day, brits, "yer gonna have to pay a lot more for oil."
brits begged usa to organize a coup, they did, cheap oil flowed. 'bp' is the child, avoid giving them money.
but iran, like prc, has been around a long time, and they were not inclined to put up with the puppet shah. so, revolution, bye, shah.
unfortunately, he had killed all resistance, and only the religious leaders remained, with any public respect. they spear-headed the new regime, and continue to justify their presence with religious laws. poor iran.
just another reason to despise usa, and uk. believe me, endless reasons in reserve.
chomsky, for instance, 'has a little list,' with more than 100 entries.
1
-
1
-
not a coup. merely a demo. trump and his stooges couldn't organize a boy scout afternoon cook-out, much less a coup. severe lack of iq in that demographic.
but perhaps there was some dim, vague, hope that magic would occur.
usa was built this way, never intended to be efficient or effective. madison and friends wanted to flash-freeze the nation in georgian aristocracy, to preserve slavery and the rule of the rich.
and it worked. brown people moved from slave to exploited under-class, but only because 'rich' shifted to factory from farm.
usa is obsolete. long overdue for revolution, but it staggers on, propped up by bloated military and moated by oceans. prc has its own problems, but i'ts big, energetic and well-led. if civilization survives the rising temperature, they will be the leading society for awhile. if you are young, learn mandarin.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
before you put up a building, you have to build a foundation. in a state, that might be a published document called a constitution. usa has one, and that foundation has shaped the state built upon it. everything you see around you was shaped by the constitution. most notably, the usa is not a democracy. it is an oligarchy- in a nation of 300+ million people, a congress of 535 people rule. whence the word 'oligarchy,' rule of a few, from greek. so lincoln was just another politician-liar, usa is not, never was a state ruled by the people or for the people. burning cities, murder by police, endless wars for profit, these are not markers of democracy.
all politicians are parasites, not just the republicans. don't imagine that replacing trump will fix your nation.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
i do wish people would not refer to usa as a democracy. it is not. technically, it is elective oligarchy. a few people rule. they do as they think best, under some constraints of law and custom. very often they do things against the will of the people . do things that harm the people. so it's not democracy, of any kind. it's often called 'representative democracy,' but that's simply a lie, to trick the common people into imagining they are citizens, equal to all. since they are visibly not equal, that's a hell of a useful trick. instead of ruling with patrolling soldiers, you just reiterate lies.
elections are not democracy. they are non-violent battles in a nation ruled by gangs. better than the old-fashioned sort, sorted out by spears and arrows, monarchies for the most part, but nothing like democracy.
1
-
1
-
but he still doesn't see the need for democracy. authoritarian societies will always arise when most people are ignorant, powerless and afraid of the future. the people of usa haves been betrayed by what passes for intellectual voices in the usa. prof chomsky saw early and spoke often about the fatal flaws in society, but implicitly accepted the premise that politicians should rule. from that stance, disaster was always likely, and here it is.
politician rule is just aristocracy, with money replacing blood-lines, so the will of rich people over-rides the wishes of the commons. perhaps worst, such a society generates a people, 'who known their place,' and never dream of being citizens participating in democracy. no, worse still, it generates a people many of whom yearn to be a hench-creature of the rich.
it's no wonder political discussion is trivial, usa has swallowed the kool-aid, long ago, at birth.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
the romans were not invincible, throughout their history they suffered severe, even catastrophic defeats. but the society was notably resilient, and kept finding new reserves of hardy farmboys to lead into battle. the usa is in a different age, where technology and economics play the decisive role in international competition, and china appears to be pulling ahead in both areas. the usa elite will not be able to adapt to this struggle, so defeat is very likely. fortunately for the whole world, there is a good chance the transition to chinese dominance will be peaceful. we can reasonably hope nuclear weapons on both sides has made war obsolete. britain has shown the way, perhaps usa will follow this model. american plutocrats may simply leave and take their money with them, leaving usa to be a hollow shell, and a backwater.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
sorry, earthlings - if you want a society with justice, peace and security for all, except the rich, you have to get off yer ass and establish democracy. it's not easy to get, not entirely easy to maintain, but seems to deliver a decent life for most.
the swiss came closest, and for now are resisting the death by a thousand cuts that envelopment by the eu is conducting.
scandis, and 1 or 2 others don't have democracy, but maintain a reasonable standard of living with socialism, for now.
getting democracy hard, and the bad guys will do all they can to prevent getting or keeping.
the great difficulty is that the orcs who control elective oligarchy prevent the education that makes democracy possible.
homo sapiens does not attain democracy easily, it is not natural. but if you do not get it, you will die out, as the orcs are incapable of maintaining the planet in life-sustaining condition.
and that's the morning mail, from planet aurora.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
of, by and for the people? you lost me there, mate. the revolution was fought to protect slavery, and create access to the thinly populated native lands. the constitution was written to protect wealth, notably the wealth of slave plantation plutocrats. 'american democracy' is a monstrous lie, madison dismissed democracy, as it would lead to the 'opulent' being taxed 'to provide for the poor. so he wrote a constitution mimicing as closely as possible the structure of georgian britain. no democracy, that.
the people were never asked to participate in establishing the constitution, it was done by the grandees in and controling the state legislatures. except in rhode island- there was a referendum there, and the people turned it down.
there was no promise of american democracy, and that's why the rich continue to rule as they have from the beginning of the nation.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
lincoln lied. government is not by the people: no referendum, no initiative, no recall. equals no democracy, and so not for the people. politicians will tell you that politics done for you by politicians is better than democracy- you don't have to bother your wooly heads, just line up to be shorn or butchered, and you will be otherwise free to find your own grass, if you can. well, it is better- for them. and better for the rich, who own them.
tg is a politician. believe her at your own risk.
andrew yang is not a politician, you can reasonably believe what he says, except where he says he's trying to be president. he himself can't believe that. he actually wants to make a better usa. which is a different thing. but you can't build a space ship out of horse shit, so ay is doomed to disappointment.
then there's bernie. he's a religious guy who appears to think that americans can be brought to socialism if he just talks long enough. ain't gonna happen, because the fundamental law of the land is that the rich own america. stop and think: fdr had total command of congress and a populace desperate for change, but he accomplished little, and most of it was lost by the 70's, because power remained in congress, not in the electorate. and congress will always be bought.
bernie doesn't have those conditions. doomed to disappointment, even if he gets in office.
10, 20 years from now, there will be radical change. climate catastrophe and valueless usd will bring civil war, and a military government.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
the dnc has one or more clever people, so clever they can see the tactical advantage of a second trump term: it's gonna be a horror for whoever is in office. when trump leaves, dems will be a shoo-in for 4 years at least. it's quite possible they won't be able to fix anything, but they will have a genuine boogey-man to blame for everything.
an absurd way to run a nation, but usans are too dim to see reality, too passive to do anything about it, anyway, and ten years from now are going to be living in their own variety of russia.
i watched the pelosi fridge interview, thought as everyone does, "marie antoinette, you lost your head and no one took note." but the important lesson is, among its many failings, the management selection process of the usa is frozen in time, and madame p. confuses herself with la duchesse de california. no wonder usa is lurching towards decadence.
1
-
you can't put people ahead of politics. but if you put people in charge of politics, then they can take care of themselves. that's called "democracy," and until you get it, the people will be counters on the poker table of politics.
in an elective aristocracy, such as the usa, politicians promise fish, sometimes they even deliver fish, but until they hand over the fishing pole of power, the people are on their knees, hands out-stretched begging for fish.
you might think 'the peepul' should be smart enough to figure this out, but evidently not. lucky for politicians, eh? ms gabbard is not the first to cry, "make me president, and i will throw endless fish from the motorcade as i travel around town receiving supplications written on paper, wrapped around rocks." the paper will be re-cycled for use in the toilet. no, not the first, but she does have a novel claim to precedence, in suggesting that loyal gunmen shouldn't be wasted abroad, when they would be safer and more valuable protecting the presidential motorcade. they could dispense fish, small fish, as well.
1
-
@graywalkerjoin3rdparty74 i occasionally suggest getting democracy, but the blank faces, or those that smile as they say "we have democracy, an advanced form done for us by those wonderful people in politics!" has long since extinguished any hope of progress. you need a new constitution, which begins "we, the citizens of the usa, are masters of our nation and direct its activities through referendum and initiative"
this is not an amendment, this is revolution. and the people of the usa are not citizen quality people, since they are content to be ruled by politicians. so the ship of state will sail on, badly managed and riddled with rot, insensible to reefs, and leaking faster than the pumps can throw.
a common story, from rome to the austro-hungarian empire, one can only surmise that h. sap. is incapable of good global management, and is hard pressed at any society above village level.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
their bias is so popular in usa as to be part of the national character. tg decided to be the voice of the grunt, similar to ay headlining with free lunch. ay made the better choice, usa lives for 'war.' usually not real war, more often is banditry in uniform, assassination and pacification through occupation. lives for 'war,' and dare not give it up.
tg will never be elected while usa media have a word to say. ay has a very broad program of patches for the rotten ship of state, but ubi is !socialism! and the ship of state will be allowed to sink before that happens.
neither one of them had any chance of success. the people of the usa will get what they deserve. it won't be much, but if you are ignorant, maleducated and submissive in character, well, that's evolution in action.
1
-
1
-
1
-
democracy dosn;t depend on a king, not even an ersatz king. but usa is not a democracy, and the cheap pageants of the oligarchy are long ago exposed to all but children and dimwits.
madison made the senate master of the nation, no great stroke of genius, a mix of house of lords and roman senate, clothed in monstrous lies about the equality of men,.
he had recreated the britain of george the 3rd, but secured for the rule of rich white men, most particularly masters of enslaved brown people.
modern americans often worry about their 'democracy.' i can't think why.
you have got along without it for about 230 years, and never had it as a british colony, why worry now?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
they were explicitly and clearly against democracy, and very much in favor of slavery, although they had to clothe it in talk of 'indenture.' socialism and capitalism were not explicitly mentioned as the economy was too primitive to sustain such societies.
madison and jefferson were not entirely agreed, but both were very much in favor of preventing any taxation that did not guard and extend the freedom of the rich.
there were contrary voices at the constitutional convention, but they did not prevent elective aristocracy, nor slavery, so they were not, in the end 'founders.'
jefferson had a lot to say about the 'rights' of man, but it was mere hypocrisy, he didn't perform as he talked. of course, he may have classed field slaves as 'sub-human, ' while looking after his concubine well enough.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
i love it when bernie supporters are robbed. they are eternally surprised by the crookedness of their society. grown-ups would assemble around a table in a cheap pub and plan revolution, but american lefties are part of the elite and soothe their outrage with an ice cream cone.
every aspect of american politics is a business, including 'rising,' and the dnc. they 'selected' clinton last time, and they will 'select' biden and/or buttigieg this time, if they can. they are in business, in the oldest plutocracy on the planet. little wonder the rot is becoming obvious.
incidentally, calling the dnc rude names is childish. you tolerate the system you inherited from 'landed gentlemen' in powdered wigs, you are the problem. passive complainers are not the solution. revolution is not impossible, it just needs citizen-quality people, and there is the central and fatal character flaw of the usa.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
if you don't like the way politicians rule the nation, leave, yourself, or make the politicians extinct. that's difficult. takes effort, organization, possible violence.
in my experience, not one usan in ten thinks the system needs change, and that one thinks it's impossible. which is true, in view of the other nine.
so continue to whine about the situation, there is a living in it. but do try to put an element of light-heated sarcasm in the presentation. we all need a laugh rather than a moan.
anyone who thought biden was going to be an improvement on trump will be gravely disappointed. 'america is back! is as close to a threat as you can get, without naming a victim.
1
-
1
-
aristotle was smarter than you. he wrote a book about politics, classical hellas was chock-full of politics, and he came to several important conclusions:
the fundamental question to ask about any society is, "who decides?"
depending on 'who decides,' various labels appear, 'aristocracy' is rule by the best. monarchy is rule by a king, timocracy is rule by the generals, autocracy is rule by one, and democracy is rule by the citizens.
usa is an aristocracy, although many would argue that politicians are not the best of humanity. others would contend that they are, particularly when they are, or seem to be 'the people's choice.' regardless of your opinion on this matter, the president, congress and supreme court rule the nation. certainly not the people.
so the usa is not a democracy. consequently, when you hear someone say, "we need to do away with the electoral college," or "they should limit the term of justices," you are listening to a child dressed in his parent's clothes, or a fool, or a cynical liar intending to fool you into believing your opinion is valuable, when it is not.
you have no formal input into the management of your nation. politically, aristotle would call you one of several disparaging words, but a not a 'citizen.'
among those various kinds of political society, aristotle came to the reluctant conclusion that democracy was best. only because the others were worse.
democracy is not unknown in the usa, several states have democratic constitutions and use them. but most of the people in the usa are simply not citizen quality.
elites always rot, usa aristocracy is typified by donald trump.
thing won't get better, the materials are not there.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
bernie might have done better to stay away from debates, present a socialist program, and retire with honor. he is simply better than americans deserve.
there was never a chance of success, i suspect the occasional appearance of obama represents a warning from cia, that a 'lone gunman' was warming up, and only support of biden could save bernie, absurd notion, isn't it. not in today's america, and it wouldn't be the first time, either.
stay home, bunnies- supporting the dnc pick will never get a progressive.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
one day while watching a wildlfe doco, hyenas filtering into a massive herd of wildebeest, i suddenly understood why homo sapiens is not interested in democracy. it doesn't pay. instead of meeting the hyenas with horns and hooves, they just shied away, confident someone else would be an easier target. no sense of community in such a large herd. so too with h. sap.- just keep yer head down and the elite will pick on someone else. depressing, since we have the intellect to manage democracy, if we are in it, and it makes the life of the great majority better. it's just that getting it in the face of pressure from human hyenas is too much trouble. we are literally our own worst enemy. julian is probably a jerk. up himself, due to being smart, and very good in i. t. field. but:
for whatever personal reason, he did the chumps of america particularly and the world in general a great favor. ' here is the reality of america, look on their works and despair.' it should have inspired every chump in the world to send a postcard to the american government, promising to visit with fire and sword. nope!
1
-
talking bout the democratic party is a waste of time.the rich run america, because that was the purpose of the constitution. its structure is simple: concentrate power in a few hundred people, and buy them. it has worked very well, and until 'progressives' get out of the way so real reformers can change the constitution, not much can be done about plutocracy.
this may be impossible: 'progressives' accept elite rule, they just fantasize that somehow a political elite is going to 'look after' the helpless mob. has never happened, but the alternative involves sustained struggle. too hard for middles, and the poor are too busy with survival.
usa is doomed, and unfortunately this time political collapse will accompany, and cause, environmental collapse.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
trump is an ordinary sort of crook, unlikely to go to jail because he is rich. but the important thing is, the professional politicians couldn't beat him to the oval office. that should tell every rational american that their political system is hopelessly dysfunctional, simply obsolete. and that is why china prospers while usa sinks. and no public figure says so. possibly excepting andrew yang. he is not so frank, as he hopes to be elected by ordinary voters, but his suggestions are symptomatic of clear thinking about the future. i think he can't win, he is a walking, talking accusation against the character and competence of the democratic party, who couldn't even deal with a trump. the best americans can hope for is pete buttigieg, they may be dumb enough to select beto, or crazy enough to go with gabbard, who is a great whistleblower but not suited to high office.. not clear who she's working for.
really interesting times. and then there's the looming climate catastrophe that america's political elite is ignoring. really interesting times.
1
-
the usa was never a democracy. if it had been, the people would have been citizens, not pawns. with citizen initiative they could have controlled plutocrats, and made politicians obsolete.
but madison explained that his constitution would prevent democracy from happening, and he delivered. anyone who talks about loss of democracy, is simply ignorant. at best. often they are cynical liars.
until you face reality, you can not change it.
nader and hedges have a long history of speaking for the pawns, but their contribution resembles the soothing of serfs by priests - 'nothing can be done, but heaven will receive you.'
only revolution can fix the usa. but this needs a people who see the need for transfer of power from politician to citizen. chris, and ralph, do not see this. so they are just 'soothers.'
or, perhaps they see that usa people are incapable of revolution, and offer soothing as a political pill. a pain-killer.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
inflation begins when the government wants to increase the money supply.. they had to dilute the silver in days gone by, then paper money saved effort, now electronic transfer creates money out of literal nothing.
greedy corporations is a nonsense. of course they are greedy, always have been, and are.
but that is irrelevant. the core of inflation is buying something useless, absurd quantities are spent on 'defense,' and this does enrich the greedy corporations, but the shareholders get that money by enriching the politicians, who are not only greedy, they have the 'more money key-board' in their hands..
usa is an oligarchy, not a plutocracy. there are no literal plutocracies, the rich can only beg, and bribe. but the few who decide policy, law and action, are the rulers. the money they take from the rich is very real, but it is extra-political. no politicians stands up and says , "i vote 3 billion dollars worth of 'no,' the total worth of the 'yes' vote is only is only 300 dollars, so the motion is defeated."
if you don't like rule by politicians, i recommend getting rule by citizens, aka democracy. why does no one suggest this startlingly obvious solution to usa political corruption?
1
-
if yer too dumb to get democracy, then learn to love yer place in society, whether high or low. high is easier, of course.
but with practice, you can master the curtsy, and if master's son pats you on the bum, giggle and run, if you can.
i don't know why usans don't want democracy, but it is a common human failing, so no shame in being stupid, i suppose.
1
-
it's difficult to say, if usa is king of the world. there was always some of the world where they were not king, because they didn't have any interest in bhutan and similar.
they were masters of iran for awhile, through their puppet shah, and when iran escaped, usa looked a little weaker. so they try, endlessly, to recover that dominance. when your power is fading, it is vital to maintain appearance, or others will leave as well.
china has stood up, able to defend itself, and to direct its foreign relations for its own advantage. if they see some value in commercial relations with iran, who can frighten them? usa can frighten many, still. elected officials of many nations fear the usa, for sanctions indirectly lead to loss of position.
but increasingly, usa sanctions are revealed to be naked assertions of power in pursuit of profit, and implementing those sanctions become also dangerous to politicians of client states. e. u. states are shifting to trade with china, because it benefits them, not usa. greece and italy are well advanced toward this policy, spain is likely to follow, perhaps even france. they have been exploited by germany and since germany trades with china it will be difficult to forbid that trade.
the e. u. was an excellent idea, for germany. they achieved with words what hitler could not get with armies. but is fracturing, chiefly because it is such a good idea, for germany. perhaps china will inherit the excapees?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
celebrity dance contest- old guys got the moves, but legs gone. in biden's case, brain failure possible, but not significant. he was always dumb. didn't bother reagan, or dubya, and yang would be run-away leader if brains mattered, but it's a dance contest. , brains don't count.
the american political system was devised to preserve slavery, and ensure the rule of wealth. and they worship the constitution that brought them dubya, trump, reagan and truman.
1
-
1
-
usa was never designed to be well-run. the people who designed the usa, chiefly james madison, wanted a nation that was static. slave plantation grandees were on top, and he did all he could to make sure it stayed that way for as long as possible.
with great success, 4 of the first 5 presidents were those grandees, and the 5th promised not to rock the slave ship.
but after the civil war, slavery was illegal, but the management of the nation was locked away from the people, still.
the constitution has precluded good management, on purpose. the rich were meant to rule from the beginning, and still do- it's not an accident.
so, in 20 years, prc has come from nowhere to 2nd biggest economy in the world, while usa has decayed.
any oligarchy will decay, since predation is much easier than development, and the desire to enrich one's children regardless of their capabilities means too much development money is in the hands of selfish and greedy incompetents.
1
-
1
-
there is only one solution to a nation's problems: only democracy offers a chance that decisions will improve the life of most of the people. government by any elite will only help a minority of people, the elite and their supporters. there are no democracies at present, possibly excepting switzerland, so it may be this is a solution beyond the normal capabilities of humanity. if so, we are doomed.
voting for politicians is not democracy. elections are just non-violent civil war, creating an elite ruling group small enough to be bought, rented, occupied or bribed by the rich. that was the express purpose of the constitution, and it has worked well for the rich from the beginning. democracy is possible, some american states would be a democracy, if independent, and the word is in constant use since it has charms for the ordinary voter. but that use is lies to keep people from democracy by insisting you have it, when you don't.
rule by politician is leading humanity off a climate cliff. changing politicians won't fix it, you just get a buttigieg in exchange for a trump. so, wake up, or die.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
usa is an elective aristocracy. not a democracy. public figures will only talk to the public when it advances their career,
usa people deserve no better. their masters are, in general, amoral scum. they could be replaced easily if the usa peep was not an ignorant, prejudiced political blank. but there you are. democracy must be won, and held, through struggle.
this requires a certain level of knowledge, and energy, to get and maintain democracy.
neither present in modern usa. so, what to do? leave, has appeal. but you must have professional skills and a good second language, so usa will hold you, and rot within. even prc can weave rings around usa politicians, simply by requiring competence to progress in the party. usa politicians are self-selected for greed and venality. intelligence and knowledge not required, or even useful.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
the titanic went down slowly, there was time for chatting, ballroom dancing, maybe even orgiastic sex. but for many people there was no escape, as the design of the unsinkable ship didn't include sufficient lifeboats. the usa is much the same. no citizen initiative, as it was intended that the aristos would remain in charge 'for the ages.' but the ship is sinking, and some of the passengers would like to prevent it. yet there is no provision for direction by the plebs except violent revolution.
usans can be successful thugs, mercs and brothel door guards, but they are an apolitical people, quite handless at revolution. so the ship will sink, slowly, with much chat, but no substantive action.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
why must putin do anything? well, i suspect he 'must' drive ukraine to its knees, if he is to remain in power.
that won't be easy, ukraine is well-supplied with patriots, and if they happen to be nazis, so what? and there is good ol' uncle sam, bankrolling the proxy war. plus, state of the art weapons, and a few 'special forces.'
this equation resolves with a nuclear bomb on a ukrainian city. and if that doesn't get their attention, a second city.
usa is not entitled to display shock, horror. they did the same to the japanese, with less excuse. the japanese were begging to surrender. and in fact, the underlying reason was to tell the red army to be polite. so, no shock, no horror.
1
-
there is democracy, and various kinds of elite rule. in usa, the best label is 'elective aristocracy,' with the implicit understanding that the economics of the voting system make the politician/aristocrats susceptible to the demands of wealth.
so, in an informal sense, usa is a plutocracy.
and money rules, in every aspect of society: throughout a campaign, there is little or nothing said about what a candidate will do, a great deal of reporting on his/her financial resources.
this political system is so corrupt, so degenerate, so dysfunctional, that a donald tump came to be president with no visible talent or experience or plans. more astonishing still, his success in gaining office has not impelled any interest in examining the system. nor can there be: there is no function of public action, no power of initiative. the politicians are embarrassed that an outsider can break in, but have no interest in disturbing the system that rewards them well.
the people of the usa are political morons. they are raised without education in politics, it would be wasted on someone whose role is work, when needed, disappear when not. they put up with this when most are in work and the rest can survive in drug distribution or prostitution.
but work is less, alternative trades over-subscribed. civil violence has begun. the response of every official is invariably the same-- jail them!
that will work for a long time, but it creates a criminal class with a political background.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
ahhh! 'watch,' you've finally caught on. usa is not a democracy, and you are just a watcher. not a citizen, just a civilian, or less politely, a chump.
'our constitution,' like it was sacred- it was written to protect slavery and 4 of the first five presidents were slave plantation grandees, and to ensure the rich ruled, they still do. usa education is pathetic.
bernie won't save you- fdr could have, with 75% control of both houses, but didn't. bernie would never get close to that number.
1
-
1
-
1
-
one of the problems arising from not living in a democracy is, you can't vote for a plan, policy or law that you think would be good for the nation. the only thing you got is voting for a person who says he/she will deliver it, in office. if you are old enough to vote you should have discovered they can't deliver 'it.' or they lie, and have no intention of delivering 'it.' you know this, if you are not an idiot. still, everyone in usa pretends they are citizens, when secretly almost everyone knows they are just chumps.
i am confident andy yang is sincere about his intention to deliver ubi, but he skips over how. in case you don't know, presidents do not vote in house or senate. andy yang has no vote at all, about actually putting ubi into practice. no wonder he skips over it.
so, how does america change? usually not at all, that was the intent of the constitution. that's the main reason china is eating your lunch. the only significant change in the history of usa was the eradication of slavery. that was not legislation, entirely, it needed civil war, and the result was segregation, jimcrow and kkk. they were still lynching brown kids in my distant youth. and police murder them by mass gunfire to this day. so, not eradication, so much as re-shaping.
usa was born to preserve slavery, a reality that has poisoned the nation ever since.
can andy yang save the nation? unlikely, don't you think, even god given up on you. ubi will happen. when bandit gangs of unemployables begin to disturb the middle classes, electronic cash will begin to seem necessary. may be too late to save the nation, but you got off to a terrible start. maybe there was never a chance.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
usa protects human rights? well, they started with slavery, 'progressed' by unleashing soldiers to break strikes with volleys of gunfire, and chomsky keeps a list, more than 100 instances of american violent interference in foreign states, notably the overthrow of the parliamentary government of iran. south and central america are littered with the corpses of american respect for human rights.
it turns out that china does 'capitalism' better than usa too. their hi-speed rail system makes usa look like toonerville, they are about to flood the world with 5g phones beyond the technical capability of the usa, and they are putting more solar screens up every year than usa has in total.
the changing perceptions outside usa are quite right, china is the new leader of the world many important areas. and plutocracy, exemplified by usa, has become toxic.
1
-
1
-
1
-
if you want to wipe the smile from yer face, just drop-in on chris.
so far as i can tell, usa had doom built in, at the founding of the nation.
the politics is rotten, side to side, top to bottom, and there is no saving it.
the people are cattle, the rulers are scum, but scum with mass death at command, and sufficient money to buy or frighten foreign politicians into compliance.
but the evil empire seems to be crumbling, which is 'goodish,' except they are likely to set off ww3 as a device to hold power.
is chris going to stop them? nope. neither did chomsky, and dr sachs has joined the new cottage industry of shouting "evil!" and "doom!" with equal results - nil.
this is not a matter of individuals remarking on current events. it is a national culture born bad and essentially immovable.
the only cure i can imagine, is for a large part of usa people to get off their knees and demand democracy, at gun-point.
clearly not gonna happen. no one even thinks about it. 'cattle' was cruel, but accurate.
1
-
1
-
i suspect the high cost of usa education is built in. college diploma is the best insurance against unemployment, and likely to pay off in high salary. so make them pay for a chance at a good life. this is america. and perhaps there is a motive of control in imposing heavy debt on educated people.
for the nation, it is disastrous. unemployment generates crime, and ill-educated people must choose between hunger and crime. it will lower the national capability at every level, except perhaps at the very highest, brilliant foreigners can be bought in.
the mind-set of usa is utterly selfish. everything is about money, and there is simply no long-term aspect to national management. how can there be, where 'show me the money!' is the core of every conversation?
but there is nothing to be done. this is bed-rock usa character. it will contribute to the decay of the nation, but there are several worse problems, such as militarism, which are more pressing.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
haven't you noticed the smell? i noticed the smell when i was helping the usg brutalize vietnam. poison dust? napalm? machine gunning women and children and chucking them in a long ditch?
and listening to lbj moan about how being a maniac war criminal was so expensive, no end in sight, those stupid viets just wouldn't give up!
krushchev got tired of seeing missiles based in bordering states, and took the obvious remedy of planting a few in cuba. fidel was willing, usa threatened imminent re-establishment of usa rule.
kennedy was sane, did a deal. leave fidel alone, move missiles away from ussr.
but usa doesn't have national policies, since it is not a democracy. it's principles change with rulers. lbj left cuba alone, they had backing from a nuclear power.
poor vietnam did not. should have done, you would think, but prc wasn't there yet, ussr was not unhappy that prc was threatened by usa.
usa is evil. immensely powerful, and run by politicians on behalf of wealth, private and corporate. they can do what they want, and don't start off with any ethics at all.
only the people of usa can change things for the better, for themselves and the world. i see no evidence of substantial revulsion by the people, of their government, and its world view. indeed, more and worse is quite popular.
so i got as far away as i could, and have joined voltaire in gardening rather than hoping for sanity in humanity.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
well, a golf pro would be a very unthreatening ambassador, and a very typical feature of the emergence of a cosmopolitan middle class in prc.
they aren't a communist nation, anymore. barely socialist. better to think of them as a new mandarinate, educated professionals who claim to rule the nation as the inheritors of marx, lenin, mao and deng. no tincture of democracy, nor ever likely to be, but a much better sample of china than the usa politician rulers, whose only expertise is lying, bribery and the occasional brief career in law. cp-prc is trying to control corruption, with some success, future may be less rosy.
right now they are running china very well, and tired old usa can not compete. so usa will consider going to war, that is their only remaining strong point. i hope prc is strong enough to dissuade them. there would be no winners.
the recent asean treaty shows that china's neighbors are at least remaining neutral, and even oz and japan want a piece of the pie, while conspiring to throttle china with military strictures.
interesting times.
1
-
1
-
there is a superficial community of interest from xin jiang to iran through af/pakistan that should bind these nations into a trading community. prc would act as a military guardian, as well. how could it fail? well, there are varieties of islam, which might dissolve the material benefits.. fingers crossed, that reality will not be ignored because of a religious flavor. and of course, cia money will be dispensed to all who might keep violence the theme within afghanistan.
no one loves the taliban, but they are the only effective resistance to endure 20 years of usa-cia hegmony in their land. it is useless to complain about the aspects of modern 'liberal' society that are lacking, their detractors were not in view as questioning the usa occupation, and allied iraq invasion and occupation.
the world deserves the taliban, and if you don't want more of them, start saying 'no' to usa aggression.
1
-
1
-
mr hartmann is wrong. jeffersn insisted on the bill of rights, because without them, the constitution would establish an aristocracy of wealth.. with the 2nd amendment, citizen militia was about as strong as a national army, having the same weapons and greater numbers.[potentially].
there are public documents discussing these matters.
the 2nd amendment no longer is effective, because military technology has overwhelmed private arms.
but the big lie, is the notion that the constitution establishes democracy.. it does not.
madison was very clear, that his proposed document prevented democracy because democracy was a bad idea.
it would, he said, "lead to the taxes on the few rich subsidising the concerns of the poor many."
and he wasn't having it. neither were the grandees at the establishment convention, so they approved the constitution.
and that is why millions of americans are homeless, and plutocrats can play with rocketships..
america's problems is not guns, it is the lack of democracy.
the word 'democracy' means 'the citizens decide.' not politicians, citizens.
people who claim usa is a democracy are dis-educating the nation.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
'our democratic institutions?'
when you ask a question like that, you make the problem worse.
the problem is, usa is not, never was, a democracy. you don't have, never had, democratic institutions.
the problem deeper still, is profound ignorance and cynical misinformation.
you can't have democracy, if you are dumber than a rock, as evil as a politician, and too busy to fix either one.
1
-
1
-
1
-
there is no clear path to peace. the usg reacts as the great commercial forces of the usa direct, and they fear declining wealth, since it is already clear that usa iis losing market dominance. similar conditions led to ww2, and usa is in the habit of using military force to shape and control world markets.
i think, i hope, prc is already strong enough to deter actual war by the principals, but peripheral wars are certain. venezuels remains under immediate threat, iran is struggling under sanctions, but recent contracts with china and russia may relieve the stress.
the usa people are going to solve nothing. they have no power to direct their nation. they have heard of democracy, but prefer to be ruled by politicians, acting for plutocrats. they are not citizen quality people. sorry, mr janssen, you don't have the power to ease tension, and those who do, don't want to.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
well, usa insisted taiwan was part of china, for many years. because usa owned the guomindang government of taiwan, and would have owned china if their stooge could get back in control of china.
the actual government of china agrees that taiwan is part of china, just as usa insisted - it's just the prc is not going to be a stooge of usa. there is no intention to invade taiwan, it is unnecessary. unless usa uses it as a base to threaten prc, as it has done, in the recent past. has everyone forgotten these inconvenient facts?
the president of philippines announces his intention to follow usa direction in dealing with prc. we can safely imagine that some combination of threats and bribes has re-shaped his opinion. pity is appropriate, philippines and its president are poor, and easily threatened and /or bribed. they may be on the wrong side of history, but we will have to wait a bit. in the meantime:
take notice that usa has no tools but bribes and threats. prc relies on trade and mutual respect. the only aggressive actor on the world stage is usa, it is not china.
1
-
the thing is, nato nations reneged on their undertaking to stay out of eastern europe. when they rolled up to vlad's neighbor, with a publicly exposed coup, he formed the opinion that it was better to start shooting while he could.
nato/usa can't lose here. ukrainians do the dying, russia is bled and smeared, and usg is laughing.
but vlad is yer basic russian: win or die. they didn't beat the nazis with better weapons or better generals. it was courage and determination. the orcs who run usa don't understand this, perhaps they just don't care. they won't die, others do the dying, as in ukraine.
it won't get much worse, in ukraine, it will get much worse in europe and north america.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
fyi: this is a demonstration of the difference between 'referendum,' which sd ain't got, and 'plebiscite' which is what your masters camouflage the lack of democracy with. with a plebiscite, if they like what the commoners want, you got it. if not, 'naughty children, go back and vote right.'
but don't be angry, as far as i can tell, no one in the usa knows about these things, or if knowing, has no notion of getting democracy since the rest of society are natural born serfs.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
if you can't distinguish between democracy and elective aristocracy [ in service to wealth ] then life will be unending mystery and intermittent agony. in fact, that's darwin manifesting himself in usa society. just as the neanderthal couldn't cope, so too, will you find those tricky chinese pulling ahead in every area. be humble, it will be gradual and with luck you won't have to learn mandarin. your children will, and they will translate what you need to know.
if you ever did a history of usa course in high school, you would have read and discussed the aim and method of the madison constitution, which he submitted to the assembled members of the convention. he promised a society ruled by the rich and explained how it would happen. he delivered, and still does.
in fact you never did such a course, i'm not even sure young people do any history nowadays. grown-ups certainly show no signs of understanding how they got here, and why it isn't going to get better.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
the pretense of national community has been largely scrubbed away by the stresses of failure to cope with the virus. it was just a pretense, always, but now lies, personal and organized are common currency and all measures short of violence are in use to preserve the rule of the elite.
the 'children's crusade' at the capitol is actually a trivial occurrence, symptomatic of the rage infecting the dispossessed exworkers, but not representing any effective resistance.
this is not the end of days, societies often struggle on with rebellions bubbling away, look at french history. but it will require military force to keep the lid on, in future.
emigrate, if you can. learn subsistence farming if not. usa is a long way from done, unfortunately, but it's breaking up.
1
-
1
-
1
-
not fair, exposing the underside of usa society. fortunately, the real people live on the other side of town, in a gated community on the far side of the golf course. they are untroubled. what's the use of being rich, if the unwashed can trouble your appearance of a conscience?
the constitution established plutocracy, under a thin mask of elective aristocracy, and those richos have held on ever since. even fdr and the great depression could not shake that constitutional base, although i suspect fdr didn't try much. he just did enough to contain those socialist troublemakers, and becoming the armorer to the western allies did the rest.
nothing will change, if the people do not demand democracy, for the elite will never give it to you, and populist leaders will not, either- why risk my position? so it comes down to the character of the people: do they want democracy? no visible evidence of it. the limit of their wishes is a kindly old fairy godfather.
still, bernie better than biden, better than trump. even a temporary respite from decay saves a few lives. but your grandchildren will spit on your graves, because temporary patches don't fix fundamental problems, and the coming environmental collapse will be a doozy. except, a second, even greater depression is widely forecast. it might save the civilization, for awhile at least. they'll still spit, but be alive to go on doing it. oh! what interesting times.
1
-
you do have a problem, but so far, no one grasped that it all began with the constitution. that is the rock on which american society is built, and it is the foundation of oligarchy, in the control of wealth. the founders had no need for religious control, but their inheritors in the republican party do, so it is used.
it is in the interest of most politicians that the electorate be ignorant and frightened of the outside world, religion prospers here too. between them they have made americans into malleable chumps. nothing to be done about it, madison made a nation unresponsive to its people, out of the well-founded fear that democracy would lead to socialism, and the destruction of the rich with taxes. so it's revolution, or decay. decadence seems very likely.
1
-
there is very little democracy around, to support my opinion, but i think people who live in a functioning democracy become citizens while growing up and being educated. as a matter of course, they know their opinions will, collectively, direct the actions of the polity. they learn some basics about economics and social interactions among equals. when referendum day comes around each year, the questions will have been examined and discussed publicly. now and then, a group will put before the electorate a question the administration has neglected or proposed inadequately, and that initiative will be decisive . because, in a democracy, the people rule.
perhaps they manage things in this fashion in switzerland, nowhere else among nation states. some of the american states operate this way. and that's about it.
much more common is elective aristocracy, where a few hundred people make all the decisions, and can hide from the people the reason for a decision. in such a case, you can be certain that corruption is endemic, incompetence commonplace, and national planning chaotic. equally bad, a populace raised in such a society is ignorant, cynical and alienated.
elections are not democracy, and choosing which politician, or political gang is elevated to power is simply a medieval level of social evolution. no wonder 'representative democracies' and 'parliamentary democracies' find it difficult to demonstrate any level of competence in an electronic age.
1
-
1
-
1
-
politicians work for the middle class at local level, mids and uppers at state level and uppers at national level. that's the way the federation was designed. lowers are occasionally appealed to, when convenient to the aspirations of an aspiring politician. aoc an outstanding example, in recent events. she got in, and discovered she could do nothing if she crossed the [very] old hands.
rich and middles don't worry about police, so they hire the cheapest labor and 'suggest' the lowers are all crooks, just not yet caught. so in the result, cop/murderers are frequent enough to convince lowers to stay out of sight.
usa was designed to be a hierarchical society, landed gentlemen on top, brown slaves at the bottom. the occupants of each level have evolved, but the places remain.
nothing to be done. at best, civilized usans could migrate to blue states, and secede. or just emigrate. neither blues nor reds seem interested in democracy, yet establishing political equality through democracy is the only way to control plutocracy. so, move- farther the better.
1
-
1
-
unfortunately, all you vote for is politicians. in a democracy, citizens vote for laws, public action, and national plans. referendum and initiative are the tools, and accessible public administration are the foundation.
but usa is not, never was, a democracy. it is a variety of oligarchy, effectively a plutocracy, with help from politicians and generals.
and its people are not citizens, but only civilians.
seemingly endless resources, no strong neighbors, if ever a nation should have flourished, it is ol' tisofthee. instead, a brutal, murderous sewer, sinking into general poverty, while threatening global war. really, god must be laughing.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
the solution is simple: get democracy. use citizen initiative to re-shape the nation.
simple. also impossible.
who wants democracy? not many.
who even knows what it is? not as many as you think.
how many know what it is, and hate it? quite a few.
starting from here and now, you can't get there.
usa will continue to decline, ultimate failure built in at birth.
meanwhile, ticking over slowly, the climate crisis will overwhelm human society. collapse certain, extinction a lively possibility.
depressing prospect? glad i'm not young.
abandon hope? can't- it's the only game in town. but if you are young, get off your ass- politics is more important to you than anything else. organize, act, or die young, gasping for air.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
over-population is the fundamental problem. we should be at 10% of our current number.
now, which 90% should go, and how to convince them to leave in an orderly fashion?
one obvious measure is wealth: poor people don't enjoy life, often struggle to eat, they won't be missed.
but another scale comes to mind: cull from oldest first. not losing much, often poor, and if they have any property, better in the hands of the young.
a third possible criterion arises from the second: richest first. elon and zuckery could make thousands comfortable, if we can persuade them to cash in their chips.
really doesn't matter how we select, so long as it get's done. how to do it?
a lottery! but instead of drawing a losing ticket, and depending on people to go quietly, you get a winning ticket, which authorizes you to prune 9 people. the surviving 10% will be happy people, with no enemies!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
presumably, pakistan, afghanistan and iran will profit greatly, via bri, with assorted trade and infra structure projects based on prc, india could do the same, in principle, but the modi government has welded the nation to the usa. seems like a mistake to me. but not clearly so. if we presume that actual war is avoided, then india has blundered. if usa aggression does lead to general war, india might be on the winning side, except that very likely there is no winning side. but if india joins its neighbors in the fruits of bri it will certainly be on the winning side, for usa can not go to war without india. maybe on balance, modi is destroying india's place in the modern world for some personal political advantage? just look at the character of the people who run usa, can it possibly be right to associate with such creatures?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
democracy is not under attack, for there is no democracy.* elective oligarchy is bought by wealth, private and corporate, and a desperate class of wage slaves and unemployed see their rescue in a 'strong man,' commonly from the military. autocracy is born.
the rulers tell the descamisados, "we give you a form of democracy, you can vote for one of us at regular intervals and we take over there, deciding what to do, too hard for you."
"call it [adjective] democracy, modern and easy."
this behavior is common in human history, and the [insert lie] democracy is just the successor to religion in controlling the serfs.
but people who aspire to describing modern events, in historical context, should not be willing to swallow the 'democracy lie.' use elective oligarchy, for that is the reality.
*the swiss stumbled into a reasonable form of democracy, and have profited from it. the process was more or less random, and not easily duplicated. no on else has been so lucky.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
many americans might think this is good stuff. it is at least critical of the msm. ms. ball appears to have talked herself out of employment, which deserves respect.
but it's pretty useless.
12 people met in a shabby restaurant in shanghai, 1921, and founded the communist party of china. a lot has happened since, not all good, but china has truly stood up, has created a state controlled capitalist economy, brought technology up to equal world's best, and lifted most of their people out of dire poverty. that's what usa needs- revolution. not chit-chat about the greed-mutants who run the nation.
andrew yang is the only candidate to offer a program to meet today's conditions, but remains a sideshow. the election process is not going to turn america's economy around, even bernie is treated badly by the msm, and i believe he would achieve little in office, anyway. usa needs revolution, because the structure of the state is immutable. break it, or continue decay into extinction.
1
-
1
-
1
-
what is broken in america? nothing. it's performing just as its progenitors designed. it's meant to be run by the rich. the constitution was written to achieve this end, and it works. it can't be fixed, without amendment, and that amendment must be fundamental. not gonna happen.
currently, the usa is waging war on venezuela, by covert means, although so visible that it is clear. you are living in gangsterland, and no one of these candidates says so, except gabbard. she doesn't say so either, but at least she suggests the military methods aren't working well. i don't find this appealing. she has nothing against violence, just wants it done better. she has reason: china is running rings around usa, not least because their system at least puts competent people in power. there will soon be an economic bloc called 'asia' and knit together by commerce.
frankly, none of the candidates would make it to the politburo, except maybe yang. poor guy only has america too work with. lucky for him, he won't be candidate, or in office, and won't be joining the list of lack-lustre politicians that are not making america great again.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
what, not who, is a good question. answer is difficult for americans, because the only formal input to government that they have, is 'who?'
in a democracy, the citizens determine 'what.' but in an elective oligarchy, 'who' is the only question, and the choice is very limited. connecting the who with the result is next to impossible, since many candidates have no intention of carrying out promises, and many others find that holding their office depends taking bribes and betraying supporters.
why do americans put up with a corrupt and ineffectual management system? because they have abandoned hope and lost all connection with their masters. usa began with a constitution that was sold to state grandees as likely to ensure the rule of rich over the many. it worked so well that it continues to imprison the minds of americans, they never dream of revolution.
bernie makes trump nervous, because he has beaten the usual corrupt democratic candidate, and bernie is different. it's quite possible bernie might beat trump. but that is not the primary question facing america. bernie in office doesn't change the political culture of america. it will remain an elective oligarchy until someone writes a new constitution.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
voltaire made a career out of the insanity of his government. but this is usa. no insanity there!
sociopaths, otoh, there is no shortage. many in government.
but that's nature for you. a nation of ignorant fools will not be governed by philosophers, much less by angels.
the concept of rule by color-labelled gangs was trialed by the byzantine empire. it was meaning-less thuggery then, much like the red-blue contention in modern usa. the actual business of government goes on out of sight, utterly unaffected by popular opinion. that's why a populace of ignorant fools is harmless - the real people are in charge, relax. naturally, they are looting the nation, and the world, but that is evolution. future-man will be orcs ruled by degenerate wizards. for awhile, anyway - this is heading towards extinction.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
has the usg denied the bio-weapons lab in ukraine story?
and there are neo-nazis in ukraine, you can find them on the web, for yourself.
and in the usa, for that matter. more in ukraine, probably. they sent a division to fight for hitler, after all.
but today's lesson is 'myths.' there are plenty in usa, notably the idea that usa is a democracy. is not, never was, and judging by the blind acceptance of the lie in the usa, never will be.
you can't get what you never had, if you don't know what's missing. what's missing from usa 'democracy, is 'rule by the citizens.'
there are other words, for various kinds of elite rule. elective oligarchy is precisely right for usa.
usa is built on endless lies.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
i already know all this, i need someone to organize mass-action to change. and i need to see a seething atmosphere of discontent, ready to boil over in to revolution. instead i see a nation of slaves, a froth of hyper-rich grandees, accommodated by a preening political guild.
usa ain't france, ain;t russia or china, ain't even cuba or venezuela. is it something genetic, or have they tamed americans with drugged fizzy drinks?
i blame marvel comics. they have schooled americans to look to the sky, where plutocrats in flying armor hover looking to save drowning kids.
plutocrats don't fly, folks, or save kids. they hire poolboys to do that, for fizzy drink wages.
no matter, those nice guys in china will save us, once we promise to stop running errands for the yanks.
1
-
don't wait, visit as many consulates as you can find, there are livable nations if you have professional skills. if not, learn to build cabins in deep forest, and hunt and forage for food. usa is incurable, the disease is genetic. usans like to talk about capitalism, but that's the first mistake. usa political structure is elective oligarchy, functionally in the control of any concentrated wealth, personal or corporate. 'capitalism' is just the sugar coating on reality.
the cure for all your problems is getting democracy. a nation with citizen rule through initiative will have as much socialism as it needs, and may even be peaceful, since the deciders are the same people who get shot and bombed and gassed. getting democracy is easy. the only reason you don't have it is that usans are not citizen-quality, being raised, educated and trained to be alienated servants of wealth. can't see reality, can't bond with others, afraid of dying but unable to live.
as i said, leave if you can, withdraw if you must.
unions are not useless, but you had them, in the 30's and 40's - yet here you are.
they are not the fix. you must transfer power from congress to electorate. that is revolution. it might be peaceful, but if violence is out of your repertoire, learn to live on yer knees, if they will let you.
leaving is the personal solution. the social solution is revolution. good luck!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
as long as you think a politician is your friend, you brand yourself as a fool. democracy is rule by the citizens, usa is not a democracy, you are not a citizen.
you can make yourself into a citizen. organize, subscribe to a constitution establishing democracy, invite the congress to make it law.
if they don't, you may have to shoot them. transfer of decisive power often requires shooting. but not this time: not many in congress have seen the front of a gun. they dispatch 'special forces' to kill foreigners without blinking, for them, killing is the stroke of a pen.
mass displays of disrespect will deal with the parasites, the prospect of real democracy will win wide support, what are you waiting for? is yer fairy god-mother gonna do it for you?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
khomeini characterized the usa with the phrase 'great satan.' it seemed accurate at the time, if a bit florid- i'm not religious. but he was right enough, usa seeks profit through murder, piecemeal and wholesale. so, while i applaud any effort to educate ordinary usans in understanding prc, i am inclined to think it will not change the nature of usa politicians and public officials. there is also a great number of ordinary usans who are simply sociopaths, unfussed at murder done abroad is search of a market. you won't meet them on this site, i suppose, but they make their presence known elsewhere on the web.
as a simple example, consider the presence of usa in iraq and afghanistan, sanctions on iran and venezuela [plus a coup attempt!] and the continuing story of cuba.
and there's plenty of sordid history in south and central america.
so i wonder if becoming friends with the great satan is suitable to people striving for ethical life. shouldn't we be attempting to sanction usa?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
you can't have rights, if you are not a member of the ruling group. you often have privileges, which are extended to you by the ruling group, while you make yourself useful to them.
in the usa,the ruling group is the congress, supreme court and president. not the people. who are not citizens, they are civilians.
a populace of ignorant, passive and alienated people can never be more than civilians, and frequently less.
i'm sorry, you have no future. revolution is very hard and conditions in the usa are unsuitable. to begin with, the country people have most of the guns and will support the politicians. so there will be no shortage of police and soldiers defending the government.
and forgive me, you think the electoral college is the source of your problems, you might even think trump is a one-off, delivered from mars by space balloon.
from that intellectual base, you are not going to achieve anything.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
the usa people bought a cow, back in 1789, which it has suited their masters to call a race horse. it doesn't win races, they don't even hope for milk, and they are endlessly perplexed at its lack of performance.
there is something wrong with the character of the usa people, they have heard of democracy, and don't want it. they are told they have democracy, and they are satisfied, even though their 'democracy' is unresponsive to the will of the citizens.
they complain endlessly at the activities of their masters, and accept their station, as serfs.
the resolution of these dysfunctions is prevented by a public education system that invented double-think and newspeak before orwell was born.
between mal-education and continuing mystification it is unlikely that usa will ever recover from its birth as a society devoted to slavery and the rule of wealth. even people making money from complaining can not see the roots of their discontent.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
usa talks about democracy, but is not a democracy, and doesn't seem to know what the word means. the capitol 'happening' was not a coup, it barely got past 'demo.' but a couple of people died, almost by accident, so it's worth discussion.
the root of the problem is the lack of democracy. the current political system is elective aristocracy, and it is not responsive to dissatisfaction among the cattle class, the political descamisados. there are lot of them now, angry, and have nothing to lose. many have to go to jail, and creating political criminals in large numbers is not a long-term solution to usa stresses.
the constitution must be scrapped. this won't happen, since the people on top are not going to change the document that supports their wealth and power. this dilemma is commonly resolved by revolution, but there will be several fruitless demos first, while the shirtless ones learn how to break a nation.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
this is pixies chatting with fairies about what they will do when they are in charge of the world. economists have their role in society, but it is not decisive.
aristotle fixed a base to human society: begin with, 'who decides?'
the answer to that question has been various individuals and groups, whose common feature is the direction of decisive force. politics is about force.
there is 'autocrat' at one end of the spectrum, then groups - 'oligarchies,' and then 'democracy' which is rule by the citizens. democracy is usually too hard for h. sap. and autocrats tend to meet a dagger, or poison. human society is commonly ruled by a few.
when that few is voted for, it is often called 'democracy, ' but this is a lie. it is elective aristocracy. the lie is told to poison the mind of the people. it works. you can't struggle to get democracy if you are told daily that you have it.
elective aristocracy has corruption built in. look at the character of the people who hold national office. they are political whores, doing favors for the people who pay for their advertising. it is literally impossible to be successful in politics unless you are crooked.
in some states, people got tired of this corruption, and attempted to suppress the opportunities for corruption by creating some level of democracy in the state constitution. this did work, to some extent, but democracy was not carried to completion, and corruption does continue.
only when all public activity is in fact public, can corruption be erased.
in the federal government, you have no right to know what is going on, much less power to correct it.
why does prof. wolff talk about 'democracy at work?' beats me. not much democracy in the usa, and co-ops don't have 'force.' but he doesn't want to talk about reality, it's too depressing. there is a reason co-ops are not much seen, and plutocrats rule usa. it is immanent in the foundation law of the state.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
trump is a cornered rat, and would sell the usa for a get-out-of-jail card, in a flash. if you don't understand this, you should leave politics to grown-ups.
but that doesn't mean the professional politicians aren't grifters, and murderers too.
yer problem isn't trump, or the politicians, it's more fundamental:
usa is crooked, top to bottom, left to right, from birth. and the people who grow up in this society seldom escape the national psychosis.
there is no good-guy vs bad-guy in the usa story. that is childish when children believe it, among grown-ups it's insanity.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
aoc wants to be the little mother of her supporters, they want whatever coins she can squeeze out of the masters. they are too poor to fight a revolution. revolutions begin when the middle class get angry. that may be never, although the recent addition of 25 million unemployed might contain some people who thought they were middles. most were hanging on lowers, and their 'revolutionary instincts' only lead them to henching for the masters. see placard wavers for 're-open.'
i can sneer at aoc, but underneath the original tough talk is the usa reality. forgive her, she lives in the real world.
the french revolution began with the middles, the sans culottes didn't get in until they had to, since stalemate was starving them. something similar happened in russia as well.
so, usa middles, forgive aoc, or develop a spine and start collecting guns and molotov cocktails.
1
-
1
-
1
-
usa society is a natural organism, and every part of it is shaped by the rest. when the people are passive lumps, the elite are lazy and self-indulgent. when the society shapes most of the people into passive lumps, with education and law, then that is what they are.
don't laugh or sneer, unless you are sure you are outside of society, with some independent character and view.
people do what it profits them to do. in a society with great variation in wealth, there is a good living to be made in supporting the masters over the mob. if you don't like this, what have you done to change the society that generates this behavior?
most will answer, nothing. there is widespread dissatisfaction with the structure of human society, but no visible means to change it.
1
-
only the swiss have any kind of democracy, flawed and being degraded by being encircled by eu.
many usa states have some or all the attributes of democracy, except the vital one of independence.
usa is an elective oligarchy, not a democracy. the politicians tend to be rich, and usually in the service of wealth, private or corporate, so it can be called a functional plutocracy.
prc doesn't pretend to be a democracy. it is an oligarchy, dependent on the pla for its authority.
even so, for historical reasons, the central committee tends to look after the welfare of nation and people much better than usa. because initially 'communist,' the whole world was their enemy, and the strength of the nation was the only defense of the party.
the chinese people are not citizens, merely civilians. they play no role in the management of the nation, much less direct it.
this equally true of all nations, except the swiss.
why then, is 'democracy' claimed and discussed?
because applying the word 'democracy' to all those varieties of oligarchy has killed the meaning of the word, and reduced chances of the people organizing to get democracy. it works wonderfully well.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
strangely, mmt quite resembles the ancient monetary theory of rome. need more money, stamp out more coins, with less silver, finally none at all.
inflation is the old man's killer of nations, and usa is well on the way.
at the same time, prc is moving to digital money, which will make printing money unnecessary, at all, at all. but i think they get daily modulation of the economy and , if used wisely, a powerful tool of economic management. they will be wise, for awhile....
1
-
putin is conducting a 'slow war,' since his goal is a neutral ukraine. zelensky is being given time to realize that his puppet masters are using him to destroy ukraine, as a propaganda exercise against russia.
but zelensky is wholly-owned, and can not negotiate neutral-state ending.
soon putin will accept defeat, or reset goal to conquest. bad news for ukrainians, since putin can not lose, and remain in power.
the good news is, usa will shrug shoulders and watch ukraine submit, those who survive. no ww3 today.
usa/nato is determined to rule the world. review that blinken quote, if you doubt me.
usa is not patient, but violent resistance will stop them, temporarily. that may be good enough, the evil empire is creaking with economic diseases, and already much weaker than when they rolled over iraq.
1
-
1
-
there was a swp, last time i looked. and the wobblies briefly flourished. and the democratic party was superficially left, for awhile in the thirties.
the idea has been tried, but it doesn't work.
and that is because of the electoral system- a close second gets you nothing, 'winner take all.'
a party that never appears on the national radar, withers greens, swp or dies -wobblies.
and if a left party won a few seats, the democrats would smother them with a left twitch, as they did in the 30's.
so no, a new party is not the answer. but go ahead and try, if that's all you got. history is a guide, not necessarily destiny.
but you haven't got democracy, and haven't got the brains or character to get it. do you really think another batch of politicians will treat you better?
1
-
usans like to pretend they have democracy, and attendant 'rights.' but they will not make the effort to get democracy, and consequently will be endlessly surprised and often outraged, when they are reminded by reality that their 'democracy' is pretense.
as it happens, madison designed an elective aristocracy, which he thought was good 'for the ages,' and which has survived largely as he wished. it was evil from birth and obsolete now, but usans have no thought of change. they cannot. only those in power can change it, and they are well-satisfied. no referendum, no initiative, no democracy, no change.
until it fractures, of course.
1
-
1
-
amusing, but you won't hear much of use from retired academics.
revolution is necessary, because continuing elite rule is driving h. sap. off an environmental cliff. this needs angry and active people, in large numbers, with a central goal and smart direction. none in sight, although we may hope they are working quietly.
marx was a failure, although a few national revolutions worked his ideas into their program.
prc is the poster child of this pragmatic approach, and is currently flourishing under a mix of 'controlled' capitalism and cp supervision right down to the village level.
cpprc is just another elite, and is already struggling to control corruption and popular alienation. but for now, they are are active and effective, and shine a harsh light on western decadence. stay tuned!
1
-
you see, 'capitalism' is not really a political term. in the political sphere, functional government is by an elective oligarchy. by no accident, those oligarchs are in hock to large money, corporate or private. so, the 'meta' government is plutocracy. but capitalism sounds so much better.
an experiment with lab rats revealed, that if food was supplied in excess, rat culture decayed and became utterly dysfunctional. it works that way among homo sapiens superbus, as well. in time, society collapses, if only because no one will fight for it.
impending climate catastrophe adds a piquant touch, this collapse could save extinction, through reversion to hunter-gatherer society, or hasten it with catastrophic wars over remaining livable land.
interesting times!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
after you have seen a few examples, you can construct a principle. you test the principle, from time to time, but you use it without test, most often. that saves time, and you can do other things.
my experience has been, usa is the evil empire.
what to do about it? personally, put as much distance as possible between us.
for the human race? resist when you can, refuse aid, when you can, label them 'evil' whenever convenient. because there may be some who haven't penetrated the lies yet.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
no, they are not all assault weapons. you can kill a person with a single shot bolt action rifle, or a kitchen knife. but an mi6 is purpose built for armed combat. personally, i see no reason why every sane and responsible adult should not have an m16 in a gun-safe if you think you might want to resist government control. but be clear, it's to kill people when needed. predatory militarism, old-fashioned banditry, is part of the usa national character, and ms gabbard has no idea what to do about it. nor does anyone else- usa economy would collapse instantly if peace broke out. so she is not a serious candidate.
my problem with ms gabbard, is that she chose the hindu religion as her guide to virtuous living. for people not born in india, that is insane. america has brought the world scientology, and latter-day saints, snake worshiping baptists - there is no need go to the far side of the world to display the fracture in your sanity.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
well, it's not democratic socialism, the scandis are a monarchy, effectively ruled by politicians, so you could reasonably style them an 'elective aristocracy.' the usa is similar, but a republic, so an 'elective oligarchy.' the only democracy among nation states is switzerland. no one would call it a socialism, but because it is a democracy, there a lot of socialist functions buried in their rugged individualism. why is the result so different? history, of course. slavery in the usa infected every public activity, and the results are visible in many areas. the mutual hatred and contempt arising from slavery and civil war makes it impossible to create a national sense of community. division among the ordinary people makes it easy for the rich to sustain their power.
as politicians go, sanders is sensible and well-meaning. but you can be a successful politician without selling your soul, so if he runs for president some unpleasant features will appear. he is old, and has seniority in the senate, he should stay there.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
the significance of usa being a plutocracy is not simply the image of a daddy warbucks picking up a phone and telling his lobbyist to 'persuade' a useful vote, with attached 'support.' money is apparent everywhere- people do politics for money, without a smidgen of public interest entering the discussion.
i don't know what it would take, to transform the usa into a democracy, but clearly it is impossible in one sense: democracy needs citizen quality people, and usa is a nation of economic units, whether signing billion dollar contracts, or turning 50$ tricks.
it appears warren's team have re-purposed her as a useful 'progressive' face in the biden government, a consolation prize now that victory is out of reach. fewer people on the dance floor, with only bernie and biden on their feet still, although the billionaire jump-ins add a certain characteristic smell to the dance floor. i love the smell of burning money in the morning!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
the democratic party is unconcerned with democracy, never has been. they were happy to have bernie as a foil for clinton, as a debate opponent, although he was alarmingly popular. that the debate loser might turn out to be the people's choice this time around pretty much brands the dnc as wholly-owned by the rich. much more convenient to the brand if bernie is not nominated.
but the fundamental american problem is a constitution written by a slave plantation plutocrat to keep the rich in power. corruption built in, and no solution but revolution. since that is not going to happen any time soon, americans are screwed, from birth. "but bernie will save us!" to paraphrase mr. 'yes, we can,' 'no, he won't.' no one man can undo 230 years of culture and law by saying 'just needs $15 minimum wage.' because bernie won't decide, even if he wins. he would need the support of house and senate to get anything done, and even a lot of democrats hate him.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
the quality of your masters reflects the quality of the people. citizen quality people dispense with masters and direct the nation themselves. serf quality people let the elite rule for lack of education and communal feeling.
lenin coined the phrase 'vanguard party' to deal with this situation, with mixed results. mao took lenin's ideas further and created a society strong enough to compete with the usa. deng xiao ping built on that base with a little economic kung fu and china will soon re-take its usual position as the most advanced human society.
can usa recover? not clear, but i think not. china's path won't work, there is little communal spirit in the usa.
sociopaths? of course they are, in varying degrees, it's not a black and white condition. any politician must lie frequently and often, and not worry about conscience. and of course, you must be attracted to the notion of moving other people's money around, for pay and perks. only sociopaths need apply.
are democrats different from republicans? not much.
you are ruled by sociopaths, and excuse your state by saying "they lied!" you knew they were going to lie, but you don't want to say, "i let them lie, because i am fearful, lazy and ignorant."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
aristotle suggested that the most important feature of a society was, "who decides?" in a democracy, the electorate decide, through the functions of referendum, initiative, and recall. and as they are the sovereign body of the nation, they demand knowledge of all public activities. the usa is not a democracy, so the people do not have access to public records, neither do they have means to enforce their will, short of revolution.
usa was never a democracy. and it appears that it never will be, in as much as no one seems to understand what democracy is, much less how to get it, or even what its value is.
usa was rotten from birth, and the survival advantages of geography and weak neighbors are exhausted. china threatens in a way that ussr never did, by being better at commerce and science than the usa. out of desperation, the american aristos are resorting to brigandage, kidnapping and contrived wars to supplement their one-time commercial superiority, and the resulting dilution in the power of law and professional administration of the nation has put a sociopathic dwarf in the oval office, the only person willing to champion the economic losers in america's failing economic world position. not that he cares any more than any of the american richos, but he was willing to lie , and the degenerate political caste were exposed in their incompetence.
trump is karma made manifest, the comic-book caricature of the successful american. usa deserves him.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
prof wolff hasn't grasped the fundamental question of politics. strange, aristotle got it a long time ago.
"who decides?" is the key question of politics, and its shadow is everywhere..
you can't have democracy at work. because you don't live in a democracy. the laws permit privately owned businesses with wage workers, and co-ops, and co-ops are very few indeed. there's a reason for that: less effective.
democracy is the label aristotle coined for a society ruled by its citizens. it means literally, 'citizen rule.'
this label is not applicable to co-ops, because they are subject to state rule.
perhaps prof wolff would like to live in anarchy, with no state supervision or control. this has been suggested, but to no one's surprise, it hasn't caught on. even less effective than co-ops.
if you lived in a democracy, perhaps co-ops could flourish with appropriate laws. but you don't.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
the important part of the capitalist system is first, it's not a system, and a better label is 'greed' in big suits.
if you don't like the results, you have to create a system. the tool of creation is normally the will of the new military master, but if you have read about dictatorship and are unimpressed , i recommend establishing democracy. the rule of the citizens, expressed in referendum, initiative and recall, is the opposite to dictatorship, and tends to offer a habitable life to all, while allowing some variation in performance and reward. getting democracy is hard. but living without tends to shorten lives.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
m4a is ridiculous, in the usa. you are 'free' in the usa, to check in to an expensive private hospital with the best specialist md's, just bring your credit card. and you are 'free' to die in the gutter if you haven't got one, although mother theresa might give you a night's lodging, while you get the dying done, if you just say "i believe,:"
warren is right to equivocate, she's a politician. they live by lying. you expect them to lie, unless you are a fool, and you are complicit in this fundamentally corrupt political process.
this is another reason, there are many, to demand democracy, at gunpoint if necessary. unfortunately, if you grow up in elective aristocracy, you don't acquire the character necessary to get democracy. you prefer to be lied to, and cheated, and sent off to war, or grow up in poverty. it's easier. and everybody lies, anyway.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
'asset' implies too much capability. he's just a desperate dupe. the core of the problem has always been intelligence, not much, and anxiety at being forced to appear competent, when he ain't.
his personal disaster is not a matter of great interest.
what should bother you, intensely, is that the political system put such a creature in the oval office. and followed with a biden. then consider, when a competent person, obama, occupies the office, he can accomplish nothing. and was smart enough not to make waves.
your political system is a disaster, it has shaped a society that is driving off a cliff and cannot respond.
and no one has noticed.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
democracy and socialism go together. that's why you don't have democracy, madison explained that it would lead to the taxes of the rich being spent to help the poor. and he wasm't going to let that happen! so he wrote a constitution whose explicit purpose was to make sure the rich wrote the laws. it has worked very well. america is and will remain a plutocracy until the people demand democracy, or the generals take over, which is much more likely. one can pity americans, their future is bleak, but that's nature, red in fang and claw. nations come and go, and america has started going. it may be a slow process, and the possibility of active general war may extend its power for awhile, but in the end, wealth comes from production and creation, both out-sourced nowadays.
1
-
1
-
the problem began with the establishment of the constitution. that solidified the american nation into an elective oligarchy. thereafter, struggle within the nation by small groups for particular advantage became the only effective political action.
it became impossible to separate national activity from political advantage.
if the usa had been established as a democracy, 'big questions' could be discussed and decided by referendum and initiative. people could agree on good ideas, without getting involved with extraneous questions. but madison wanted an oligarchy, to protect slavery and wealth in general. he sold this plan to the grandees of the individual states, and he delivered: slavery lasted another 70 years, and the rich rule still.
there are any number of toxic effects of oligarchy, not least is the effect on the character and education of the ordinary american. americans are notable for ignorance about history and foreign affairs, and personal aggression is continually revealed in crime and terror at home, assassination, coups, raids and invasions abroad.
and they describe their military adventures as 'humane interventions.' the nation lives in a giant thought bubble, an island of collective insanity.
the green new deal is an injection of sanity into american discourse. and it is so far out of the confines of the national myth as to stimulate incredulous laughter. god help the usa, for they are beyond human assistance.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
hu jin tao didn't get the memo. maybe senility, maybe simple regret at leaving behind the pretense of relevance.
there was a change of support leaders, the government of prc has goals and needs new people to execute plans.
anyway, xjp has 5 more years and a cooperative team to lift china one more step.
in fact, prc is number 1 in some measures already. only nuclear war can stop him now.
as it happens, usa is perfectly willing to exterminate cities - a valuable characteristic when peace is unattractive.
prc has begun to shift money into munitions, and has lots of money. they can threaten retaliation in the area of rocket bombs.
usa is fighting ground war, somewheres, always. presumably very sharp. prc can't match that. in spite of all the rude words thrown at them, prc prefers peace. pretty sure usa could beat them, on the ground.
but if war comes, it will be rockets. no winners.
which is where putin interjects an uncertainty factor. the russians know all about rockets. and putin is not a sentimental man. not in his interest to face usa alone. he must keep prc healthy, which seems likely to mean public support of prc. it also means he can erase a ukrainian city, and no one dares to strike back.
1
-
1
-
1
-
prof wolff is strangely misguided in his explanation of the mis-named 'revolutionary war'.
the war was necessary to preserve the position of the richest people in the 13 colonies, the slave labor based grandees of the south east. their position was being undermined in the british law, which was gradually making slavery impossible. you probably didn't get this explanation in high school, but you should have.
on to current events:
your government, the inheritors of those slave masters, is determined to maintain the financial, economic and military dominance it has gradually won over the last 150 years. since ww2, they don't even pretend towards humility, and greed has assumed its rightful place in their minds.
will this lead to war? certainly. usa has no peaceful means to maintain dominance, to feed the greed. and this is the really interesting part, for all out war means extinction of civilization, and possibly of all life.
but the twisted sociopaths who run your nation think they can achieve their goals with 'limited' war. they are teeing up india and japan to use some mix of 'incidents/raids/sinkings' and thereby frighten prc into submission.
i estimate the chances of usa maintaining dominance over prc at about zero. japan and india may get a painful lesson, and then watch their patron wash its hands and claim, 'nothing to do with usa.'
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
make america great again!
ok, you've discovered a little trail of bad smell. the more you follow it, the bigger it gets. maybe you catch glimpses of the rotting carcass of lies and myth.
but yer great grandies knew more about it, and couldn't fix it. nor can you. it was designed to be unfixable. madison boasted about how he had secured the rule of the rich, 'for the ages.' he had reason to boast. of course, if you have conviction, organization and courage, there is revolution, but so far, none is visible.
mostly, societies rot, slump, subside and disappear from history. rome 'declined' for 4 hundred years, but it just looked like re-organization for the first 300, so america has no cause for panic. but, fair warning, rome didn't have a china, and climate change was nearly invisible.
so no more great. you inherited a cow, and were told it was a race horse, reality is breaking through.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
it's pleasant to hear what seems to be a voice reporting reality, in opposition to the lies broadcast by the elite.
but in the end, the cattle just say, 'shame.' no action results.
and that is why your masters have hi-jacked the word 'democracy,' see '1984' for a description of newspeak and double-think.
the cattle could revolt, it's really easy nowadays, nearly everyone can read and write, and have web access.
but they don't. 'opposition' is just a niche profession of the entertainment world.
so elites will continue to loot the planet and crash the environment, made possible by eviscerating the word, 'democracy.'
democracy puts power in the hands of the people, who become citizens. when power is distributed to all, the will of power provides life to all. accept no substitutes.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
news flash: saudi oil is what is holding up the usd. the usd is hopelessly over-valued, and if oil trading were not done in usd, it would collapse. and other nations are beginning to write contracts in other currencies, which is why usg is relentless in trying to gain control of venezuela, and iran. but it doesn't work anymore, threats are empty, and the stink of the iraq war makes it difficult to mask the naked aggression of usg foreign policy.
it's hard to get elected when you call your government criminal, so tg just says 'mistakes' are made. she's a politician, trying for a raise in pay and power.
things aren't going to improve, until the american voter gets sick of politicians, and demands democracy. what's chances of that? zip.
so the ship of state cruises on, incapable of course change, mudbanks and rock reefs ahead. some societies just wear out- usa is beginning to resemble the austro-hungarian empire.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
you are wrong, mr janssen, to blame corrupt politicians. they are what they are because to social/political structure selects them. hyenas are unlovable, and watching them may disturb the softhearted. they are the politicians of the veldt. politician and hyena both evolve from nature.
this should be obvious to all. the nation was born to protect slavery, enable expropriation of the natives, and ensure the rule of the rich. the constitution reflects those goals, and guides the character of the nation.
the rich are entitled, the politicians crooked, the people cynical and frustrated, and frequently desperate, whence the shooting eruptions.
there is no quick and easy cure. in my view, there is no cure at all. there is no non-violent way to make massive change, and neither is there sufficient leadership in view to undertake radical change.
as a nation, you will follow rome into decay and history. please don't destroy the earth on the way out.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
when is usa going to wake up, and establish democracy? no sign of it yet, and tg is no revolutionary. she is an economic disrupter, which is why she is being ignored.
bernie is looking good, except, wait for it, mayor phoney has more delegates.
all of the remaining candidates, tg is not one, represent 'anyone but bernie' constituencies, so his good early showing may represent his high-water mark. i'd like to see him in the oval office, he is the only hope for change, but still a very long shot.
let's face it, the usa ship of state, plato's very authoritarian phrase, is set on a course of self destruction since launching. it will take a lot of sinking, but there is no mechanism of repair, the best we can hope for is peaceful collapse.
1
-
anyone actually trying to understand american society should start with the constitutional convention, where madison spelled out his goals and methods to the state grandees who could establish his document. then and now connect smoothly, even considering the transition from actual slavery to wage slavery to gig survival.
the guiding principle has always been, that there should be no bar between the desire of a man with money and his interest. he was pragmatic enough to allow limited restrictions, stealing from the rich could best be prevented by government sanctions, transferring the cost of protection to the public.
the immediate situation is the collapse of a social and political system hopelessly incapable of managing public affairs today. corruption and incompetence are inescapable, and reform is impossible.
the usa must start over, if it wishes to survive. but there is so little community spirit that 'it' has no consensus anywhere, there is no 'it.' i am reduced to hoping that a reasonably civilized state will emerge on the west coast, and another on the north eastern corner, and the rest will sink into obscurity, as bubbaland.
1
-
1
-
no, usa society turned your son into a monster. it often happens. young men who grow up without prospects will not only be poor and unattractive, there will be burning resentment. so they join gangs for emotional support.
criminal gangs offer money, or release through violence, political gangs add assurance that society is wrong, failure not personal.
modern life requires socialism, and socialism is best delivered by democracy. neither available in usa.
fascism results, and don't complain : yer own fault. you wish a decent society would be handed to you, by rulers who are happy with being on top. not gonna happen. fascism was there from the birth of the nation, it's 'americanism.'
if you won't learn, if you won't fight, what's chances of change?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
there is no turning going on. madison intended that the rich should rule, "for the ages." he was more circumspect about slavery, even though that was the base of his politics, on behalf of what he referred to as "the landed interest."
usa is not a democracy, it is a plutocracy. plutocracy is generally done in secret, and is commonly corrupt, how could it be otherwise? it depends on ignorance in the commoners, and submission arisng from ignorance and awareness of inferior position. the great strength of every elite is the weakness of the lowers, not their own qualities, which are often unremarkable.
i think usa is doomed, a nation whose masters are pedestrian, whose lowers are ill-educated and have no motivation beyond hunger will be surpassed by nations blessed with better qualities. 'doom' is relative- took rome hundreds of years to succumb to its weaknesses. but usa will be much quicker, the planet is over-burdened and small weaknesses magnify around the world.
americans are disconnected from the management of their nation, the only input is 'which master shall i support.' they are consequently likely to vote for trivial considerations, or simply not bother to vote. in fact, the whole theater show is nearly useless in directing the fortunes of the people.
why no movement has emerged to get democracy is a mystery., it happened before in the progressive movement. but since then the character of the people has seemingly degenerated. the music continues to play, the people, some, continue to dance, but the charade is wearing thin.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
marx came up with the phrase 'lumpen proletariat' as a reference to the people without hope, without energy, without self-respect.
they do not rebel.
most of usa are 'elpees.'
lenin's response was to act, in their name, with a vanguard of the outraged. this legitimized him, in his own eyes. but the result was a new elite, better than the old for awhile. but in the end, a dead end.
inspiring an active group to establish democracy in usa should be easy, since about half the states have some or all of the aspects of democracy. it is not 'unknown.' but no one tries to do that! partly because the word has been degraded through co-option by the elite, more because usa people are visible 'elpees.' dead from the neck up.
in the 60's i started asking people if they would join such a movement. response was a universal, 'no hope.' people who would demonstrate, who would get themselves jailed, who would build bombs, would not waste their time trying to organize a public movement to democracy. so i left the usa. my best decision, by far.
there has been no visible improvement. even those who like the idea of 'socialism,' either do not understand the necessity for citizen rule, or imagine that the elite can be importuned to spread the wealth, if they just beg harder.
it don't work, sport. you have to fight. and there are not nearly enough usans with 'fight' in them.
1
-
the democratic party is not an agent of democracy. they are not even honest brokers. it's just a political gang. it must have money and votes, and has discovered that money buys votes. it has also learned that losing gracefully to the republicans can pay well. it's not going to be an agent of change.
bernie brings hope to people who haven't had a party since johnson tried to expiate his sins with a bit of welfare, and this might get bernie into office. but right now, his plurality of votes in dem primaries is not enough even for nomination, assuming most of the supporters of the other candidates vote, 'anyone but bernie.'
vietnam opened my eyes about the nature of my native land, and i started asking people, "why don't we get real democracy?" it turned out, americans are mental slaves, unable to conceive of real change in the system. so it won't change, even if bernie gets in. it needs more than one old man, it needs a change in the national character.
not gonna happen.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
who is master of the usa? a few hundred politicians direct the nation, 'on behalf' of a few hundred million people. it is necessary to lie to these people to prevent rebellion. the money to broadcast these lies must come from the rich, personal or commercial, and these people have 'their' pet politicians on speed dial.
in a time of declining national income, the squeeze will be felt from the bottom up, and ultimately the myths that support the rule of the rich will be worn away.
usa is not a democracy. that should be obvious, but the word is in constant use, so the 'lies' are still effective with many people.
there is another consequence of the absence of democracy.which is less obvious: when you grow up in a fog of lies, reality is not obvious, and the character of a citizen does not form. the people are cattle, willing to be ruled by politicians, so long as they are lied to. nothing can be done with such people.
poverty and dictatorship is the usual result.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
i'm waiting to hear how a socialist society would capture a capitalist empire, with the largest military in the world and state of the art surveillance technology.
so far there is a total lack of discussion in the blather-sphere on how to transfer power from the current oligarchy, to any other demographic. much as i prefer the notion of democracy, even prc is delivering better governance with its own oligarchy of pseudo-communists.
without the 'transfer of power,' talk is just just a pastime, although in true usa fashion, technology has commodified gossip.
insurance only concerns those with something to lose. increasingly, usans are a people living on credit. they've pawned everything, and will soon be begging for slavery, under some other name. the really rich already have 'their people,' when this filters down to the top 10%, usa will have regained its original nature, a mix of lackeys and slaves, getting bread and little else from their masters.
insurance? that's a luxury.
1
-
1
-
4 of the first 5 presidents were slave plantation grandees who settled labor unrest with whip, castration and murder.
trump is merely a narcissistic dim-wit who demonstrates the degeneracy of usa plutocracy. he might be dangerous if not so dumb. and cowardly, btw.
carter says "i fear for our democracy," and that makes him much more dangerous than trump. he is re-enforcing the myth that usa is a democracy, and that myth is what makes usa a 'very stable' oligarchy. but not so stable, anymore.
the oligarchy is fracturing under the economic stresses of greed and arrogance and simple brutality, diverting national wealth into personal wealth.
carter should say, "i fear for our plutocracy," but he is a politician, however pious. he relieved calley from charges of over-seeing mass murder, not because he was innocent, but because such cases if prosecuted to source, would have destroyed the usa government. easy to understand why he did it, but no amount of 'good works' will save him from hell.
the usa today is what it has always been, even the slave pens are replicated in the privately run prisons, making a dollar from the children of slavery. american atrocities in s. e. asia just carry on from indian 'clearances.' and now there are 'special forces' bringing organized murder to lands in disfavor with usa presidents.
the notion that carter is a revered figure in the usa only measures the depravity of usa society in general.
1
-
1
-
you are on the side of the angels, more or less, but the devil bats first, last, and when he wants.
greed and arrogance characterize every elite, and the usa version has overwhelming military power to support its masters.
if sanity prevails and war is prevented, prc may come to be the most powerful nation. at present, that seems like the best situation available. usa must be humbled, if we are to survive.
but prc is human too, so this can only be a reprieve, not a solution.
we must get democracy as the only possibility of establishing a balance with nature and population. elites must always have 'more,' citizens can be satisfied with 'enough.'
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
a democracy does business in public, so that the masters, you, can follow activity and decide what should be done. there is little scope for crime in such a society, and rewards only come to those who help the nation.
and that is one reason madison devised a constitution which makes democracy impossible, and sold it to the grandees who controlled the various states.* he and many sociopaths after him, took the view that he was entitled to all that he could get/steal/find, and hold as much as his strength allowed.
the masters of the usa have established the opinion that market direction is inefficient, market limitation should be little, and the resultant economic convulsions are good for a society, compared to the alternatives. they defend this nonsense with the laws arising from that constitution. and laughing at this situation causes wondering frowns, for the constitution is sacred script. there is no hope for a people so enmired in absurd myth.
*the first lie embodied by the constitution was the phrase "we, the people." the people were not consulted, except in rhode island. there the constitution was presented for approval by referendum, and rejected. and you talk endlessly about american democracy...
1
-
1
-
usa is not a democracy, so you don't have rights. you have privileges, offered as bribes when some politicians needs more votes, and withdrawn when he doesn't need them.
ignorant, passive people will be ruled by some elite, whether born aristocrats, military junta, or political gang. in the usa, it's the gang.
if you want a better life, you have to be part of the ruling group. for most people that group can only be as the citizens of a democracy.
but how to get democracy?
you can't get it by voting for politicians. the transfer of power must come outside the laws of the nation. the laws maintain the power of politicians.
revolution need not be violent, but it does require a lot of people willing to say, "or else!"
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
there are no chinese warships, posturing outside indian cities, so who is the bully?
Philippines has been threatened by the usa, and bribed, very possibly, to join this masquerade, but they can be forgiven, they are weak, and poor. india, however, is merely corrupt. kissing the usa hand to cover the hopeless inadequacy of the indian government.
if the usa insists on war, there will be no winners, and survivors may be few. if the conflict remains non-violent, prc will knit together the supporters of peace and commerce, so that mankind can deal with the problems of population and climate.
the interesting question is, will the greedy and arrogant burn down the planet in a vain attempt to maintain their position?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
democracy is the english version of demos kratia, a classical greek phrase which means precisely, 'citizen-rule.' it does not mean king-rule, nor general rule nor parliament rule, nor president rule. the swiss have it, barely, but no other nation. and the nature of the ruler sets the quality of the people. if you don't live in a democracy, you are a second class person. you can laugh at your masters, perhaps, but they laugh at you, and their laughter is well-founded. clinton is a charming example. slick willy still is suckering the chumps.
i don't know why the people of usa put up with politician rule. there is a sickness there, a consciousness of inferiority, a yearning for a kind master, but no determination to become a citizen of democracy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
politicians are the effete descendants of norman warlords. instead of having battles, they have elections, instead of arrows, ballots. bernie on fox is the old warrior showing the young that he's still got it. may change a few votes, more important is to give the notion that ballots should settle the war, not actual violence.
nothing to do with democracy, there is no democracy in the constitution, by no accident.
hard to see bernie winning, the democrat party is not his friend, much less the republicans. but he has a great asset- he's running against trump. surely that's enough?: except it wasn't quite enough last time, when the democrats thought it was in the bag. really confusing- neither party gives a damn for ordinary people, and the chumps are beginning to figure it out.
this is symptomatic of empire collapse. andy yang is the blue bird of the spring of the new order- a bit ahead of his time, but rome found it had to give away bread, to eat at the circus, and usa will be ubi soon. the exworkers will briefly be happy, but ubi is just a bandage on a skin cancer. a nation unwilling to tax the rich has no future, although madison would be proud that it had this much of a past.
1
-
this is what my english teacher called a 'rhetorical question.' the response can be varied, and possibly non-verbal. sour laughter might be appropriate, if outdoors, you might spit. grift is built in to the usa law and culture. any elite rule needs mystery, to prevent endless dissension. but reality keeps poking up, and brews contempt for rulers at least equal to the contempt the elite have for the chumps. mutual contempt engenders disregard of law, morality and finally mere politeness is dropped.
usa will continue, but the elite will soon be traveling in car convoys, heavily armed mercs ahead and behind.
you, otoh, will be lucky to own an old bicycle.
1
-
1
-
1
-
you can't fix democracy, if you haven't got it. if you don't even know you haven't got it, you don't have any direction to move, being ignorant past instruction.
for lack of an educated populace, the nations of the world are directed by an elite of some kind. an elite is on top, and any change is unwelcome. this is going to lead to disaster, possible extinction.
if, suddenly, democracy were general, and the people were educated to their role as masters of the nation. disaster could be averted. but that window of opportunity passed, and in reality it was never in reach of homer sap.
didn't miss by much, we can see what we should have done, if we were a little more civilized, and less submissive to the sociopaths who generally direct our nations.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
capitalism is not a political category. nowhere do capitalists direct the movement of armies. in the usa there is a political structure, commonly called 'democracy.'
that is a lie, the usa is not, never has been, a democracy. the lie serves to blind and soothe the powerless population.
the political structure of the usa is an elective aristocracy. politicians are allowed to rule because the founding law of the nation establishes them as the legal rulers. their moral 'right' exists through the notion that they are 'the best' able to direct the nation by virtue of their character, education and experience. none of this is true, but there is no way for the populace to dispute it, short of revolution.
nonetheless, usa is a 'capitalist' nation. this is a euphemism for plutocracy. capitalism rules through the extra-political means of bribing politicians. the result is to create a society that is efficient at maximizing the wealth of the plutocrats. it is not efficient at delivering a decent life to all, or even most, of its people.
is capitalism in decline? no, greed is always part of the human character. but greed corrupts the efficiency of the nation, and a capitalist society will eventually consume itself. the obvious example was the export of manufacturing to china, further enriching shareholders at the expense of labor.
the usa is in decline, because the parasites of wealth have made it weak. the decline of the usa was built into the structure of the nation at birth.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
left and right are empty labels nowadays. in byzantium they used red, white, blue and green, the colors of chariot race stables. no political significance, because the people had no power. so too, in usa. you can stir the water, but never turn the helm.
the people of usa could stand up, establish democracy, and make themselves into citizens. theoretically. but, by no accident, usa public education produces alienated and ignorant consumer-units, one pay-check away from hunger, and querulous but submissive. rioting will grow as more become hungry, but soldiers eat regular, listen to the sergeant and quell the riots. just like firemen, really.
usa is not finished yet, but the prospect is depressing. action is needed, and no leaders in sight.
1
-
1
-
1
-
the people are frozen out of the management of the nation, so talking about what your masters do is pointless. unless, of course, there is a big difference between them. but there isn't. the mechanics of the voting system makes it profitable for all politicians to agree on what the rich want, so they will subsidize 'elections.'
which is why tweedledum debates tweedledee. it's also why congress-things age and degenerate in office, the cumulative investment of the rich makes turn-over very slow.
usa is not a democracy, it's people are 'citizens' only by courtesy, it's rude nowadays to call 'commoners' common. and since they are powerless and ill-educated, they are very common indeed. it's true to say, "you get the government you deserve," but if your society shapes you to be ignorant, passive, how can you deserve better.
and that's why usa decays, infrastructure mirroring character.
this self-reinforcing loop means there is no way out, short of violent revolution, and that will only happen when wide-spread starvation sparks desperadoes to run towards the guns, careless of life.
don't worry about china, worry about yourselves.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
if you had democracy, it would be an interesting question. but you don't. madison was explicit, that his constitution was not a democracy, that he intended that the 'opulent' would rule, and they do. history has lessons to teach, in this case, 'how we got here' and where 'here' is. 'here' is a functioning plutocracy, by design.
it is very hard to get democracy, when you think you have it, and don't. orwell described the control of the proles through language, double-think and newspeak, in '1984.'
worth a re-visit.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
obsolete constitution, 3rd rate public education, 100th rate public health, no job security, declining national competitiveness, and sure enough, a high percentage of desperados float to the surface, the mirror image of the defective human who wandered into the wh because the professional competition was even more degenerate.
the usa truly is in deep trouble and many, perhaps most, of its people have every reason to be anxious.
not least because there is no significant number of voices reporting the problems above, and pointing out the comprehensive action needed to save the ship.
barring national idiocy, this may well be the result of general recognition that the usa is terminal in its current form.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
no, the problem is not the parties, they are the natural result of the constitution. they evolved to be what they are, under the conditions imposed by the constitution.
i suggest that a constitution establishing democracy, national management by referendum operated by the public service, under ultimate control of the electorate through citizen initiative, would deliver a better nation. because, when decisive power is dispersed to the people, they will require that national wealth be widely distributed too.
in short, stop voting for people, start voting for action.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
'capitalism' is not a political system, it is a fig-leaf label on functional plutocracy, effectuated by elective oligarchy.
in simple terms, usa is gang-ruled on behalf of rich patrons.
but that doesn't matter. most human societies are similar, and that's the best we can do, having only hairless monkeys to work with.
if you were smarter, you would get democracy and mix it with socialism, and manage the world in a survival- oriented fashion.
but, collectively, yer just too ignorant. result is traditionally wide-spread misery, and lately there is a lively prospect of racial suicide.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
one part of history is that nazi germany tried to carve off part of the ussr, and the bush family tried to help them.
there are nazis everywhere, visible in ukraine, and usa. history can be embarrassing.
of more recent relevance, blinken says nato can go anywhere and recruit any nation. this is imperialism, so far effectuated by bribery rather than violence. very easy to buy a nation's leaders, particularly if they are rich, and want to join the rich man's international club.
putin has watched usa buy up the former ussr states, and realizes that this reduces russia's pool of trading partners, and decided to cast the dice. so far, so good. usa/nato has proven to be talkers, not fighters. ukraine wheat will be sold to russian housewives, somewhat like iraqi oil being sold to usa distributors.
when it comes to imperialism, usa is no.1. although the iraqis don't seem to like it. usa finally admitted they had no visible purpose in afghanistan, and only stayed there because, hmmm...
the history of the usa gives you no base from which to preach virtue. those young republicans are right: stay home. and clean up your own house.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
if you had the intelligence, education and courage to be a citizen in a democracy, politicians would be extinct. but you are not smart, you are ill-educated, and wimpy. the rowers of athens were classier people, the swiss during the course of ww2 ran the world's only democracy while under continual attack by both sides which i think retired the trophy for courage and self-respect.
and all you can think of is a very mild plague, and whether you should choose king1, a dimwitted phoney with nothing but money, and contempt for the people that fear him, or king2, a stock politician, the lackey of corporations, and loose with his hands. oh, and senile.
a nation born to protect slavery is never going to be classy, but you could try for reasoning and humble. nah- 230 years and not a speck of either. the truth is, trump and biden distill the essence of usa in their body and character, they are usa. embarrassing, but there you are.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
i read 'decline and fall...' as a young lad, and it was educational. there were some colorful characters in roman history. but many years later, the lesson is more general: a society that concentrates wealth while eviscerating its populace ultimately is unable to defend either wealth or people. insert 'usa' here.
china is not a threat, but usa rulers will call it a threat, to cover their own sins. china is a magnet for investment, which usa wealth has responded to heartily, eviscerating american industry. china builds all around the world, usa sends 'special forces ' instead, bandits and murderers in uniform. china is not the threat, folks, it's the usa.
trump is not the disaster he might be. hasn't actually started a war yet, clinton promised one. his economic activities are pointed towards looting the economy of its last drops, presumably he will join the american elite on some private island. don't blame trump. blame your failure to get democracy. don't blame politicians, blame the electorate who are willing to be ruled by politicians. if you haven't got the spine to stand up and say "democracy, or else," then don't complain- evolution does not favor the dim and spineless.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
the financial system is not the problem. oligarchy is the problem. when a nation is run by a few, count on it - it will be good, 'for the few.'
btw, in the dim mist of time, when a child could see 3 short films on saturday morning for 10 cents, a pound was worth, or could be exchanged for, usd 5.
in fact, pommyland has been since slipping before the kaiser tried his luck.
i don't know why the brits let fascists run the nation, perhaps their water is drugged?
another possibility is the quality of the opposition. when both sides stink, whoever can finance the best lies is in with a chance.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
the reason 'political discussion' never rises above personalities and gossip, is quite simple: usans are not citizens, they are only civilians. your opinions are never called for about peace or war, more tax, or less, better schools, better hospitals, etc. except in some states, and not peace or war there, either.
you don't live in a democracy, so you do not act like, or think like, a citizen. can't be helped, but this kind of cafeteria back-biting doesn't help yer brand.
1
-
sometimes societies are unable to respond to changing conditions, and disappear. i think usa may be one of these. madison said he had created a polity 'for the ages' and usa is already much older than most nations, and still clinging to a constitution that was obsolete when established. it is very stable. when you are preserving plutocracy, stability is fatal, for the rulers are the last to be affected by exterior change.
just think of the quality of the people who have been in the oval office, trump might not even be the worst. the management of the nation is simply poor, and the quality of the foreign and domestic activity makes that obvious.
andrew yang is an interesting candidate, so was obama. neither can greatly affect the culture of a nation. the fact that political discussion is directed towards, 'who can save us, who is a fairy godfather,' means the culture creates a lower class unable to envision participation in the management of their lives. democracy is beyond their reach, beyond their imagination, and there is never a fairy god-father in politics.
so i suspect the usa will be joining the qing dynasty, the austro-hungarian empire, and rome.
1
-
1
-
1
-
unions are not the answer. democracy is. civil administration controls unions, and they should, because no small group should control the nation. replacing one elite with another doesn't establish justice. democracy is the answer, for many reasons. one is, unions will flourish in a democracy, because their total membership will be a large part of the electorate. union rule has been tried, in the soviet union. it collapsed into party rule immediately because it was not founded on democracy. union bosses are no better than politicians, and that is a very low ethical standard.
civil administration controls the nation, always. the big question is, who controls the public officers. it should be the citizens. any other answer is oligarchy, and consequent exploitation of the people.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
democracy is a society ruled by its citizens. you ain't got it, never did. not only do the people* not rule, they generally don't even know what's going on.
usa was born a fascism, but, not being italian, they call it 'americanism.'
lies, myths and simple ignorance make it easy to control the cattle.
*people, not citizens. 'citizen' requires a certain level of education and character, and life in the usa does not encourage either.
as to today's question, a- no, b- you can't, c- you can teach a dog to walk on its hind legs, but it still doesn't know what democracy is.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
'americans' never have a useful choice, as they are not citizens of a democracy.
usa is ruled by political gangs, masked by the euphemism 'party.'
there are only two, of consequence, and there is some difference between them, from the viewpoint of the cattle.
one is bad, the other worse. neither offers a decent life to ordinary people.
recently, the emergence of prc as a contender for global dominance has cast doubt on the principles of usa governance. the performance of china so far over-shadows anything in the history of usa that suddenly the tawdry lies of usa history are revealed to all, and even 'americans' are beginning to question the notion that usa is the standard of human social performance.
it turns out that running a nation with methodical planning by educated professionals gets better results than submitting to politician rule. are you surprised?
you shouldn't be surprised. but history is not taught in the usa, beyond a few myths designed to turn children into submissive labor units.
pr. wolff is quite wrong.
suggesting that 'elections should have given 'americans' choice' is a nonsense. it implies that politicians 'owe' voters, when the actual status of ordinary 'americans' is that of cattle. you don't give cattle a choice, you don't 'owe' them, you herd them.
usa is not a democracy. until you acknowledge that reality, you can't get democracy. without democracy, political discussion is just wishful gossip. or the mooing of restive cows.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
it is a truth not widely known, that 'rights' are the fruits of power. no power, no rights. that is why, when citizens of a democracy are dissatisfied with the activity of their administrators, they act to discipline those administrators with citizen initiative, that citizen power is the law of the nation, superior to any administration act. and you haven't got that power, so you have no rights.
the usa is not a democracy, and you are not citizens. you are merely civilians, which is the modern euphemism for 'serf.'
why then are you called 'citizens? i refer you to a book called '1984.' you didn't meet it in high school civics class, but you should have. in fact, usa education is little more than myth and arithmetic, you can hardly expect to be told that 'matrix' was an allegory. but do stop complaining, it is unseemly in the labor unit class. democracy needs citizen quality people, and you are not of that quality, plainly.
1
-
1
-
1
-
if usa was a democracy, it would be in the interests of the electorate to have a national 'forum,' where information could be shared without fear of censorship.
usa is not a democracy, stop kidding yourself, grow up, and elon is just making sure that he has a world 'forum,' to make money, and protect himself.
but right now, he sounds better than the previous owners. enjoy while you can.
you deserve no better. a nation that lives on its knees to politicians can not expect any better treatment than the plutocrats want you to have.
the essential element of being a citizen of a democracy is being ready to fight to get there, and stay there. usans just wish their masters were 'kinder.'
no fight in them, and you will see little kindness.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
sanders won't save you, folks. even if elected, he won't save you. the system is rigged. it was designed to be run by the rich, and the design works. even fdr, with his 75% majority in both houses, couldn't, more likely didn't want to, establish democracy. so the rich waited him out, and began buying back their nation in the 60's. since reagan, plutocracy reigns again. bernie isn't gonna do that well, 'progressives' nowadays fear him, and the ex-working class have reason to back the republicans. not that they like trump, but they need to stick a finger in the eye of the 'progressives,' and trump is the finger.
i f you haven't got sense enough to see the need for democracy, yer too dim to survive. you if haven't got the guts to get democracy, well, learn to enjoy life on yer knees.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
foundation myths must be dispelled, since many or most are at least thinly entwined, from childhood indoctrination.
but reality is simple. the fundamental question of every society is, "who decides?"
or so aristotle thought, and wrote. seems good to me. let's extend;
if every adult member of a society participates in decision, it is a democracy.
if only a few, then it is 'oligarchy,' which simply means, 'rule by a few.' there are flavors of oligarchy, depending on which 'few' rule. commonly a group of army commanders, sometimes a group of bureaucrats. either group might be responsive to bribes, and their patrons might be a [hidden] few.
capitalism is not a political system, it is just a euphemism for an oligarchy very responsive to bribery. the rich patrons of the bureaucrats rule not through debate, but with a phone-call.
if you do not examine who decides and how, all discussion is pointless. you must turn attention to rulers, not talkers.
1
-
right-wing populism is enlisting angry people in support of demagogues of the right. the right is committed to authoritarian rule, but they offer emotional participation in the management of the nation. that's enough for most people. the left is no better, their pitch is also simply, 'put me in charge, and i'll throw benefits to you.' right or more-right, the usa major parties are so degenerate that their campaigns consist of catch-phrases: "i'm not a politician!' or "he's a liar!" actual discussion of planned programs have disappeared.
neither side offers anything substantive: the left could offer a real alternative, democracy. they would say, join me in creating a democracy, and you will own the benefits the nation can provide, by participating in the management of the nation.
not many people have experience of democracy, a few usa states would be democracies if independent, the people in most just hope for a kind master.
so long as most are satisfied with hoping for a kind master, no real progress can be maintained. bad masters come along at regular intervals, which is why usa is decaying.
1
-
"they are not serious people." so you say. they are serious, so i say. they vote, they influence people who vote. unless you intend to conduct struggle for power with guns, then you must talk to people who will not listen. not to win them over, but to invite them to speak with and on your platform. it creates the impression you want to conduct society by talking. at the very least, you get moral authority. and there is a pleasant spin-off: andy yang can talk there and get favorable response. that's because he talks about ideas to help americans. he gets a favorable response on progressive venues too. same reason. that's why dnc ignores him.
usa is not a democracy, and americans are not citizen quality people. no shame in it, it's history, it's culture, you inherited it. but you can only vote for people, so all politics is a struggle for power. in a democracy, you vote for plans, laws and policy, so politics is impersonal and questions can be discussed on their merit.
too bad usa is not a democracy. elective oligarchy is hopelessly inefficient, and that is why the future is slipping away from america.
1
-
the man who wrote the constitution thought the british common law was the greatest work of man. he created a republic as close to that monarchy as he could. so it is nothing new that trump might resemble a british king, why did madison support rebellion? because british common law was drifting towards making slavery unlawful.. so madison jumped ship, and created a republic much like britain in which slavery was lawful.
it was a magnificent piece of weasel wording, in which 'slave' never appeared. and it achieved its goal, prolonging slavery for a further 70 years. madison died with a smile on his face, i'm sure. so did jefferson, who never ceased to spout progressive speech while never stinting himself on the fruits of slave labor.
then there was the expropriation of native land, only complete when geronimo died in 1907, still a prisoner of war, and a money-making exhibit for his captors.
the usa is just ordinary evil in its people, but wealth and military power in the service of greed have elevated it to first place in modern blights on the planet. hitler remains the devil for the foreseeable future, but usa has a lock on 'great satan.'
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
if you imagine that the machinations of politicians in office have any connection to democracy, you are deluded.
the people who wrote the constitution were clear, explicit, that the usa was not a democracy. it is an aristocracy, those aristocrats in senate and house control your life, and you can not prevent whatever harm they do.
often they work in secret, so that you can not punish individual members of the elite through election.
democracy is simple: the public service runs the nation, under direction of the electorate, through referendum and initiative. their activities are a matter of immediate public knowledge, so the citizen vote is informed.
you have none of that. talk of 'american democracy' is delusional, and usually based on cynical hypocrisy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
it all boils down to aristotle, who decided to write a book about 'politics,' and discovered that the fundamental question was: "who decides?"
who rules, in other words, but decides is better, because often a visible 'ruler' is relying on a clerk to inform him on what to do. by shaping the information, the clerk decides.
aristotle came to the conclusion that democracy was the best structure of society, and i'm with him.
unfortunately, it is not natural to human societies. we got our fundamental structure from the extended families that wandered around africa, eating roots and berries, and learning to throw rocks at predators. no democracy involved, the biggest males got between hyenas and weaker members, and presumably got first pick of females and provender. this generated bigger males, and more ego and arrogance.
and yet, democracy works well in modern conditions, or so i suppose- there is hardly any in view.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
i am one of the generation that is lucky to be old. still, curious to see as much as i can of the great unraveling.
homer sap has not grasped the utility of democracy, so the alphas will continue looting the planet. 3 people own half the wealth of usa, seems insane, dunnit? well, it is social insanity.
they already own their flight- home, in enzed. and enzed is putting up the barriers to immigration - bring money, lots.
massive shift of population is the good news. there are one or two time bombs in the environment which may wipe us out. the alphas will still survive, in planet- bound 'space-ships,' but even that might not last any great length of time.
homer sap needs a 'great leader' to create and implement a concerted plan to save the species. none in sight, and current 'leaders' are the problem, not the solution.
1
-
xjp must be embarrassed, at least. not surprised if he 'retires.'
but the chinese have had to develop a 'long view' in foreign relations, and they are capable of 10 year plans, or longer.
politician-ridden societies commonly don't know what's happening now, and are often surprised by changes of course, or masters. so perhaps xjp will still be directing prc 5 years from now. certainly not true of biden, pelosi, maybe.
5 years from now, prc likely to be stronger, usa weaker. or ten years. cpprc will still be driving china, while no one can say who will be directing usa, or how well.
and that's why xjp didn't shoot down pelosi's plane. he thinks he's going to win, so long as there is no war.
he's probably right.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
voting for people is insane. voting for plans, policies, activities- is democracy, assuming the result is binding. but usa remains in the middle ages, locked in by its history, and the resulting poor management is why china and india are going to be humanity's leading societies. not an immediately attractive prospect, but simple reality. hell, even e. u. might ease into 3rd spot.
the candidates don't have positions, just lies, chosen for ease of exposition. even forrest gump knew this much: "you never know what yer gonna get." but yer average american ain't as smart as forrest. and american talkng heads not much better, but they have to say something, they don't get paid for silence.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
just for a moment, let's everyone assume that capitalism as practiced in the usa is [evil] put your own 'bad' adjectives, i like 'evil.'
so what? are you gonna start a citizen initiative to begin reform? no yer not. there is no citizen initiative, and you are not a citizen, just a civilian, chump for short.
so what? are you gonna organize a revolution? nope, good game on tv tonite. are you gonna organize a [would-be] citizen action group, to explore ways to get democracy without shooting? well, maybe, but i see no signs of such intent, much less activity. all i see is a video of mutual hand wringing, done for cash. plutocracy infects every public activity in the usa.
food is crap, nowadays? there is considerable evidence. but so is politics, so is the vacuum where other societies have community spirit, and foreign affairs? just naked greed carried on the arms of special forces, known in my youth as 'bandits.; why should you have decent food, when your army is spreading death by bayonet and drone bomb, hired assassination and poison dust?
you are ruled by hyenas in expensive suits, under rules set down to extend the stink of slavery, and make eternal the rule of wealth. and the only smell you can detect is maybe the hotdogs aren't healthy?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
you can chat, you can whine, but you are not a citizen of a democracy, and you can not act. aoc might screech a bit for you, and that might make you feel better. but when you try to lodge an initiative you find there is no such thing. recall! whazzat?
and nobody notices, and nothing happens, except saagar and krystal feel good, and get paid for feeling good.
usa needs a revolution, and all they can come up with is "what's on yer radar?
yer only real choice is revolution or emigration. i recommend enzed, but they are choosy, oz as a reasonable substitute.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
the usa 'declared war' in 1949, have you forgotten? prc told the world it was communist, and usg went into frothing rage. then it defended s. korea from becoming part of 'korea.' and commissioned the army to advance to the yalu river to establish 'korea' too, only as a usa puppet.
a little later on, macarthur made a public assessment of which 25 chinese cities should be nuclear bombed.
prc by then came to the conclusion that it must have a credible and effective nuclear strike force, at whatever cost.
there is zero trust in beijing, for usa politicians. with good reason. the people of usa would be wise to distrust their government too. plenty of reason there, as well.
in some ways, prc is already stronger than usa, partly because they don't burn so much money on military matters.
usa remains the primary danger to the world, and its sinking economic capability is beginning to raise the possibility of catastrophic war. vietnam, korea, iraq and afghanistan have taught them that having the best military, doesn't always get what you want. they have already demonstrated a willingness to use nuclear bombs as a tool of imperial dominance, they will do anything to own the world.
fortunately, russia and china, together may frighten even the entitled masters of the 'free world' into simulated civilized behavior. fingers crossed, everyone.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
biden run? no. push a disability frame, possible. no talented person wants to be president, they are too busy being rich and getting richer. they can have a w.h. placeholder on speed dial if needed, although normally they 'have people for that.' neither trump nor biden are competent at anything, trump didn't even have what little it took to get elected, except hillary for an opponent.
and in fact, she may pop up next time, won't she look good compared to what happened? but don't vote for her, she needs to make war for a second term.
usa will continue to decay, no one in public life has a clue about how to arrest the decay, only revolution can save the evil empire from collapse.
military coup is much more likely.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
ozgov under whitlam broke away from usa, and then bungled out of office. couldn't cope with the petrol squeeze from the producer nations. ever since, labor and liberal have been welded to the usa bum. in the long term this is likely to be a strategic mistake, but politicians don't do long term thinking. can't afford it.
so ozzie 'special forces' go to nations the usa want to control, and help them do it. there is no national defense in this, this is greed and arrogance idirecting the service of men who like being uniformed killers. and a few women, too. of course, support troops get to learn a trade, very often. but the specialist shooters are there to kill.
not nice people, no credit to oz.
worse are the politicians who dispatch them for this genuinely dirty work. why do you let people like that run the nation?
assange has become the man in the iron mask, not sure why he became a whistleblower, and he did it badly, but the whistle needed to be blown, and he has disappeared from view, in oz. oz politicians of every party truly are scum.
1
-
1
-
the purpose of the american constitution was to create a state in which the 'opulent' ruled the 'mob.' that's why it is not a constitution of a democracy. madison did not want his taxes spent at the will of the majority. this principle he sold to the grandees who controlled state congresses, the establishment of the constitution had nothing to do with "we, the people," that was just the first lie. rhode island did ask the people, who rejected the constitution. the other states accepted, and in the end, rhode island went along.
neoliberalism is not new. it's just a euphemism for greed. the rich hate politics, which in principle is blind to wealth. so they promote the idea that less government is good government, which it is, for them. they like informal 'government,' secret meetings and money changing hands. nothing new about that.
don't blame the rich for being hyenas. blame the poor for being sheep. both are doing what is natural, but it chiefly benefits the hyenas. open yer eyes, sheeple.
1
-
in my lifetime, the most criminal president was g. w. bush. making war for profit used to be called 'banditry,' but the head bandit is walking around loose. of course, the war in viet nam had much worse consequences, but the blame is spread over three heads. trump is a crook like a used car salesman putting wood shavings in a worn-out transmission. kennedy, johnson and nixon performed mass murder, in varying degrees.
trump is a trivial person, except as an exemplifier of ethical vacuity in the highest office in the nation. nothing new, there.
usa was started as a device to continue african slavery and ethnic cleansing, all of those presidents would be hanged if they were not in public office, at the nominal choice of the usa electorate.
doesn't reflect much credit on the national character, does it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
of course not! that's my opinion, but it depends which language you speak. in american, of course it is!
my opinion comes from history--- athens and all that. since the word itself comes from greek, and means 'of course not! ....but you shouldn't joke about important matters when young people can hear.
democracy is our version of 'demos' and 'kratia' run together as the greeks did. it means 'citizen rule.' it doesn't mean politicians rule, it doesn't mean the rich rule. the greeks had plenty of words-- politician rule iis oligarchy, rich rule is plutocracy.
but rich and politicians want you to think that their rule is the same as you rule [with other citizens ] only better, because you don't have to waste time thinking. they don't want you to think. think about that.
so they created the phrase 'democratic republic' and gradually just let the 'republic' shrink.
you don't have democracy. perhaps most of you don't even know what it is. certainly the usa populace is too ignorant to get democracy, even if it was explained to them.
just asking this lead question is a nonsense-- the rich own you, plutocracy, and the politicians rule you, oligarchy. everyone knows this, where does the notion of democracy come from, ? it comes from systematic and sustained lies, i refer you to '1984'.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
the whole nation is ignorant, brutal, racist, and at the top, a man who adds dim to the list. oh, and grossly self indulgent, you don't get a body like that by accident. or a comb-over. the youessofay has become a serial comedy, spiced up by cop murders, political murders, and the occasional war for profit. did i mention that the middles demand that workers stay home, in a society where health care and eating require work?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
no use saying journalism needs to be protected, if you are unwilling to call for democracy. assange irritated the usa govenment who, through uk government, has kept ja in a box for years. likely he will be in a usa box, for years. this is the natural result of government, which likes to keep their nasty side secret. a democracy has to be run in public, so that its masters, the electorate, has the facts needed for decision, and can protect itself from over-ambitious officers of state. with no secrets, no need for censorship.
no use complaining about government, the problem is in the people, raised to be cattle, and content with that status.
1
-
china achieved a strong national government, of people determined to lift china into the front rank of nations. india is a collection of feudal fiefdoms of politicians whose only common characteristic is a burning desire to be in office.
china reveres education, much of india reveres cows. the others have a fixation on a god with an elephant head. depends on which creature is pulling your plow, i suppose?
china had communism, japanese occupation and usa investment. who would have guessed the result is contending with the usa for world domination?
poor india only had animism and british occupation, neither of which greatly stimulated education or foreign investment.
i believe modi is aiming at foreign investment, from usa, by acting as the local military stooge, in the struggle against prc. this plays to india's strong point, it is a practised military stooge, from long years of dying for the british crown.
1
-
1
-
1
-
china doesn't need western terminology. you are witnessing the ascension to power of a new dynasty, won by the pla, and administered by the mandarinate of the cpprc. china remains china.
the base of their society is marxism, 'for chinese conditions,' and lately it has been performing wonderfully well.
so long as they deliver a prosperous society, no one in china will give much thought to western labels and concerns.
china is not much troubled by religion, and are flexible in consequence. mao brought independence, won with the gun, deng brought prosperity, largely by applying kung fu to usa investors. a natural child of suntzu, he induced usa to give him the tools to surpass usa. mao shook his head at deng's ideas, but at least was practical enough to keep him on hand for when economic kung fu became profitable.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
it must be difficult to direct a nation, nowadays, when some nations take religion seriously, and some don't.
and the more different religions involved, the more toes to step on. add in instantaneous sound and pictures, ahh, modern life.
not so modern, really. the simple solution is to call for silence about religion, but the simple solution doesn't work. that's because many nations regard religion as central to life. islam blossomed as a warrior religion, 'good news, everyone, there is a god and we will teach you to worship him, with a sword.'
it's likely that this message would still be collecting believers, except it turned out the devil is on the other side, and stronger still.
conclusion? humanity is ruled by ignorance, and it will be the death of us.
1
-
madison came right out and said, "accept my proposed constitution, and the new usa will be a wonderful place to live, if you are rich." i paraphrase, and i should add, "and white, and a man.." but that was understood.
i don't know why murrikins swallow that nonsense about what a wonderful idea the constitution was. 230 years ago, not having 'milords' and kings was radical, but it's just medieval nowadays.
so leaving usa is a no-brainer, if yer not rich. many better places, if they'll let you in. americans are not automatically welcome, everywhere.
1
-
1
-
you can't stop them. speaking out against such men, 'in usa, is a trade, provider of entertainment for the masses, a nice little earner.
but it's not politics as pericles practiced, nor even che. there is no will behind it, beyond the desire for money, catering for a desire for another pastime.
however pathetic he may be, trump is accustomed to doing things, the freedom of great wealth, so he bought a position at the top of government. what could be more american.?
usans are just watchers, listeners, but have no power to do, in public affairs. not citizens, just inhabitants.
1
-
1
-
this is just the restoration of the gilded age, and that is the glorification of wealth which madison aimed at in his discussion of the purpose of the constitution. there was a blip caused by the first collapse of the economic system in the 1930's, but ww2 saved the economy, and put usa on the path to fascist blend of money, militarism and jingoist de-education of the people.
it is clear to me, that the total lack of any discussion of the failure of the political system to deliver sustainable and equitable lives to the people of the usa [they are not citizens, only civilians] means progress has stopped, fdr's 'new deal' was the best attempt at civilization in the usa, and it fell far short of the necessary revolution.
america's current condition didn't start with reaganism, that was simply the restoration of the default condition planned by madison at the birth of the nation.
the path ahead is well known. economic failure will be blamed on evil enemies attack will be masked as retribution and ww3/last follows. but the grandees at the top of america may be sane enough to realize they will not survive nuclear gotterdammerung. homo sap may draw back, and the grandees content themselves with domination of a much-reduced nation. less like britain, more like russia.
1
-
1
-
1
-
if the people are incapable of democracy, they will be ruled by an elite. in the usa, that elite has been the wealthy, 'shaping' the conduct of the office-holders.
this is unstable, but usa has already been 200+ years with what is functionally plutocracy, so little wonder that cracks are appearing. the next phase will necessarily involve overt control of the people with violence - see the equipment of recent police forces. they are ready.
the usa 'intelligentsia' is useless, long since co-opted into service to the rich. perhaps a cesar chavez will attempt resistance, but the usa army is a mercenary force nowadays, so they will fight for their paymasters, with splendid encouragement from the mass media.
so who will save usa from descent into peronism?
no one. the rich and their handmaidens in schools and media have created a people incapable of effective resistance. yer cooked.
homo sapiens may also be done. what hope there is lies with prc and its supporters. maybe they can keep the usa from destroying the world. the irony of relying on a 'communist' scarecrow to save the world is not lost on me, it is just pragmatic judgement.
the smart money is on emigration, to mars. elon is not as crazy as you think.
1
-
1
-
this is a war between russia and usa, prosecuted by usa through ukrainian stooges.
there would be no war, if usa did not direct and fund it.
cia has kindly explained what they have done, in picking targets and supplying suitable arms.
difficult to feel sorry for putin, but in fact his role has become the last war chief of the [native american] indians, transposed to eastern europe.
perhaps the russians will end up on nato reservations, but they are stronger than the comanche.
more important than this report, by far, is the news from moscow, that the victory day speech from putin was essentially submissive. no ww3, in immediate view.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
good report, mr j, i wish i thought it would prevent war. can't hurt, i suppose.
but the usa government is simply evil. sold their soul to the devil, because the price was attractive. there was never a day when there was hope for usa, it was born to preserve slavery, exterminate the natives, and ensure the rich ruled.
prc is run by humans, but currently they are the only power that can resist usa with effect. we everyone should do what we can to ensure usa feels too weak to attack china, your efforts are in the right direction, 加油
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
the fact that trump came to power by legal, formal, means should enlighten usa that the constitution is obsolete. but there has been no discussion above school-yard name-calling, which suggests that growing up in the usa does not develop citizen quality inhabitants. certainly, the office holders are no better than the passive civilians they 'represent,' and the supremes are useless too. the whole society is rotten, public, parties and officers of state. "what is to be done? said lenin. turned out, he didn't know. nor does any usan. i suggest that you can't get anywhere, from here- go back and start over. but you will do nothing but argue about the respective virtues of biden and trump, when you should be seceding from this vile federation.
in short, you deserve a trump, and there will be worse soon.
1
-
clearly chileans are more politically advanced than usa. nothing like overt dictatorship to educate.
but usans seemingly will never learn. there was a genuine 'progressive' movement in the usa about 1900, when several states re-wrote their constitutions, establishing various levels of democracy. california in particular is a real democracy. referendum in constant use, initiative and re-call as needed. if it were independent, it would be about 5th biggest economy in the world. you might think other u.s. states would want to follow. unfortunately, places like mississippi are firmly in the grip of local gangs, known as 'political parties.' and these states collectively allow national gangs, known as 'political parties,' to suppress any real democracy in the management of the nation. it's a very stable nation, usa. controlled by a mafia, known as 'political parties.'
congratulations to chile, let us hope they achieve democracy. but that would only be the 2nd democracy in the world, and chances a slim. as long as the cia exists, slimmer still.
1
-
rand paul hates the government. prof wolff ignores the government. is he an anarchist? but most of us live in the real world were national societies have a government. the government is the answer to aristotle's famous foundation statement, on which politics is built: "who decides?" his answer was various officers of state, oligarchy, or the citizens, in a democracy. usa is a variety of oligarchy, more precisely, it is an elective aristocracy. the officers of state 'decide.' not the people.
and that is why, among other disasters, not many workshops are co-ops, and jeff bezos can be the richest man in the world. worse yet. a dim-witted narcissistic buffoon can briefly be ceo of the nation, and nominal commander in chief. not because people like him or respect him, but because the ruling elite are so hated that any public figure not a politician, even a trump, can seem like a useful choice.
why don't you have democracy? because the people of the usa are still living on the 1600's, + technology. they regard politicians as aristocrats. a measure of their own debasement.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
unlike in usa, prc plutocrats are very polite to gov officers. where in usa, plutocrats hire and fire politicians, in prc, the personal freedom of even the richest can be curtailed at any time. and for cause; you can't get from 1990 to great wealth without crookery, and they every one know they are fragile flowers. several have disappeared from public view, most notably 'jack' ma, but many others, and a few got a bullet in the brain as well.
prc has economic problems, and many of those are caused by the recent discovery by usa that feeding the tiger makes it stronger and usa weaker. prc will need good management to surmount problems, internal and external.
but they have good management. compared to western nations, and particularly usa, very good management indeed.
the notion of an internal market replacing foreign trade is plausible in theory, but needs a plan for stasis, since you can not feed a growing population on limited land and resources. prc is better placed to attempt this, but threats from abroad demand a growing military capability, which ruined the ussr. presumably usa is beating the drum for that reason.
xjp may have trouble getting to sleep, but usa is nominally directed by a man who can't stay awake in public. the gray people who pull his strings can have no motivation but their personal position, because their life depends on giving great thought to simple office connivery. which hand would you rather play?
1
-
once again, no 2nd referendum, because there has not been a 1st referendum. there was a plebiscite, and the difference is that a plebiscite is not binding. but the word is never seen in britland, as it points out that you are a pleb, not a citizen. sorry, there you are- a pleb. the real people, the grown-up people, the people who matter, sit in parliament. you are not one of them, and your opinion doesn't matter. not legally. but telling you to your face that the plebiscite was just a clever politician's ploy, that happened to get the wrong answer, well, even cattle can be dangerous if insulted.
will there be a 2nd plebiscite? i don't know. would it get a different answer? i don't know. maybe no one knows the answer. britland is in a froth, because some politician tried to quiet opposition in his own party. hell of a way to run a nation, but primitive people must expect primitive masters.
all in all, one must wonder if the arrow in alfred's eye was not an eternal disaster for residents of the british isles.
1
-
it's widely believed that biden will win, so long as he says very little. already a trump possibility, but the bigger question is, biden wins, are you better off?
your political system was devised to enable slave plantation plutocrats to govern the nation, and it worked very well, as 4 of the first 5 presidents were such people. the odd man wrote to jefferson and crawled for his support, promising to do nothing to constrict the 'peculiar institution.'
well, slave plantation grandees don't rule now, but their inheritors in banking and commerce do. and the common people are wage slaves. things aren't going to get better without revolution. so amuse yerselves with pop culture politics, but the bankers still own you.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
mr hedges is mistaken. political parties are concentrated power,and attract bribery inevitably. since their purpose is to put individuals in power, compromise is inevitable. the attractions of office erode any original virtue, history is littered with examples.
which is why only actual democracy has any hope for sustained management of society in the interests of the people. the democratic party started off as the party of the 'landed interest' in post-revolutionary usa, the 'yeoman farmer' whose interest actually shielded the slave plantation plutocrat, the first ruling elite of america. parties have no lasting ideology- look at the 'communist' party of the prc. which now finds allowing some to get get vastly rich is a good thing. and that is why mr hedges and many others, can talk forever without result: if you want general prosperity, you need diffused power, aka democracy. any concentrated power will soon have concentrated wealth, visit beijing and shanghai, if you need convincing.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
the democrats never had democratic ideals. they are a political gang. their goal is political power, and resulting wealth. the republicans are completely different: their goal is wealth, and resulting political power. they are a gnag, completely different. now that you are clear about that, google 'secession movements in usa' and promote the one you think least looney.
the trouble with growing up in a plutocracy is that the real power is informal, and the actions of the formal state consequently follow seemingly illogical patterns. result: ignorant and mystified people. recently, bloomberg stepped out of the shadows and commenced to buy the presidency. just a pastime, apparently, as he was completely unprepared for the dance routines politicians traditionally use to display their feathers. nonetheless, here is 'real' plutocracy, and many watchers simultaneously laughed at his ineptitude while applauding his public spirit. here was a champion for sacred capitalism, just when biden and buttigieg were seen to be inadequate.
1
-
1
-
1
-
the most important thing was that afghan farmers had a ak47 and an aversion to foreign dominance.
the swiss were absolutely surrounded by the axis and under continual attack, yet survived free and independent till the axis was beaten. the swiss national militia prevented immediate invasion, their airforce was effective against nazis and allies, and almost all swiss subscribed to the principle of 'free, or dead.'
'compelling ' nations only works if the people are unarmed, or unpatriotic.
the taliban are unlovable, but it's their nation. the vietnamese held off the best of usa and it's clients, and the french before them, because they had weapons and an aversion to foreign rule.
give these people's credit: they didn't win because their attackers made mistakes, they won because they had the means and courage to fight.
usa will explain its failures as the weakness of 'someone else.' but usa is an imperial aggressor, and its failures owes most to its own moral corruption.
1
-
who will watch the watchers? an eternal problem, for which there is only one solution: democracy, and its consequent requirement of public and timely record of public activity. no secrets.
usa is vulnerable to coups and civil war, simply because the constitution does not establish democracy. the people are trained to passivity, and do not have organs to make their wishes decisive. the swiss have citizen initiative, small professional army, and a national militia. this has supported an independent and cohesive state for about 150 years, the only democracy in the world. usa since vietnam has only professional soldiers, no initiative, and a long history of mutual suspicion of the latest immigrants, and a festering sore of racial history. a coup would be welcomed by enough to make military rule easy. but the civil government will remain in place, while the plutocrats fear the generals, and can buy them. as they should- it won't be president gabbard in 2020, but it might be generalissimo gabbard in 2040.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
recently, blinken announced that nato would assimilate any nation it wanted. since nato is a military organization, and has mopped up the former sov states, putin decided losing ukraine would expose russia to economic and military pressure. so he began to conquer ukraine, and dared usa/nato to risk ww3.
it turns out usa/nato is full of moral talk, but afraid to shoot.
there will be economic strictures, for show, but the economic center of the world is shifting to asia, centered on prc. russia has already begun to join this emerging reality, and will survive, may even flourish.
zelensky has said some rude things to nato recently, apparently he has only now discovered the moral character of the evil empire and its associates. poor lad, he is the point man of a sugar lance.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
the constitution was written to provide political stasis, and worked pretty well. the major goal was to insure the rule of wealth, 'for the ages,' and they still do.
to get concern for the needs and desire of the poor and middles, you need a race of politicians of saint-like character, or you need a populace of determined would-be citizens of democracy. not sure if they must be armed, but can't hurt. that's what the 2nd amendment is for.
you will see systemic change, for the worse, but this will not provide for the needs and desires of the poor and middles.
as the rich squeeze out the last drop of productive wealth from the system, the passive and cynical populace will at last encourage revolution.
this doesn't always turn out well, but plenty of change.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
very old idea- the roman elite handed out wheat flour to clients, in lieu of ubi. it prevented starvation, and rioting.
the chinese, under communism, simply gave everyone a job, for the same low wage, adjusted upwards annually. not very efficient, but everyone could buy food, in principle.
ubi may be better, in that with free time, people might find or create additional income through paid effort, presumably of value to someone.
i think yang is too far out in front of american culture to succeed in getting office. even in office, the american plutocracy is structured to prevent new ideas from disturbing the status quo. the senate is currently republican, the supreme court reactionary, ubi unlikely to get past them.
i think switzerland is a better model than imperial rome, or communist china. but it would be even harder to re-shape usa into a democracy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"we aren't going to..." who is this 'we.?' americans skip over this part. most have no answer.
'we' is the masters of usa, a group of politicians who direct the activity of the federation. there's only a few, so i classify the usa as an elective oligarchy. it is certainly not a democracy. the government commonly ignores the opinion of the people, frequently engages in activity that endangers the people. it is absurd to label such a society as any kind of democracy. but it happens often, because 'we elect them.' sorry, elections are not democracy. they are non-violent civil war between gangs who have agreed to count votes instead of warriors. ballots matter, not bullets. the resemblance is not accidental- both come from the same latin word, for the lead slug warriors used to sling at enemies. democracies are managed by referendum, under the control of citizen initiative. both are present in switzerland and california, and work well. neither is a feature of the usa.
once you know who 'we' is, many awkward questions resolve themselves. that's why aristotle came to the conclusion that the defining feature of every society is:
"who decides?" in the usa it's a group of defective humans who shouldn't be in charge of a zoo, much less a state. and the people that let them rule are defective too: self-respect dissolved out by education and custom. deserving of pity, i suppose.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
is it invasion, when you re-occupy a province held by a dissident party backed by foreigners?
not many people think taiwan is, or should be, an independent nation. and that includes the usa. they claimed that taiwan was part of china while they were backing chiang, and more recently when they were trying to colonize china with usa corporations.
their opinions change with their prospects for making money.
prc will reclaim taiwan, if they can. they are sane, and avoid violence when possible. but usa may require the use of violence, as they use it habitually. there a possibility of catastrophic war there, and spreading to whole world.
chomsky published a list of usa foreign activity involving violence, more than 100 occasions, and there have been many more since. i don't know why usa is tolerated in civilized company, can it be because they shoot people, one, or one hundred thousand, at a time?
1
-
one of the charms of democracy is that the army and the citizenry are much the same group. 'coups' are impossible, very nearly. but usa is not a democracy.
in an oligarchy, the soldiers don't fight for the nation, they fight for a paycheck. when the army was professionalized, back in the 60's, it was time to realize that , in no sense, is usa a democracy. i couldn't understand, then, why people talked about 'democracy,' when there was none. now i'm wiser, and the concept of systematic lying to smother resistance is clear. no one in usa politics tells the truth, because all have an interest in passive and ignorant people. i have some respect for orwell, but not much - the usg - lies 100 times more effectively than the ussr. newspeak is modern usan.
is usa ready for a coup? no. the senior officers do not command the respect of their men; there are commanders of active special forces who have seen action and formed a military bond with the men. but i think they don't have the widespread respect needed. and remember, more than half of the serving soldiers are just there to learn a trade, for civilian life. not the best fighting men, in a civil war, but not negligible.
and you don't need a dictator. a drooling idiot like biden, a schoolyard bully like trump, as a front, enables the deep state to run the nation for their personal sponsors, and retirement wealth.
if there is no nuclear war, usa is tumbling into history, another 'yustabee' like uk. if the orcs who run usa blunder into war, that's it for homer sap.
are they that crazy?
maybe. their only expertise is office politics. history is a mystery. so they are fearless. immense temptation, "if we just press prc a little harder, they'll fold, and we're back on top."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
if you don't want democracy, you must accept a political elite. in america, they are owned by the rich. always have been, because that is the purpose and design of the constitution. madison explained that democracy would result in rich man's money being spent on the poor, and he did his best to make sure that didn't happen. there has been some leakage, but the design worked brilliantly, the rich still rule, and many pay no taxes at all.
if you don't want democracy, then don't complain about your government, it reeks of hypocrisy, or stupidity.
1
-
1
-
neither germany nor russia made the vital step of connecting the welfare of the people to the power of the people. when the people rule, demos kratia, they can legislate to provide a decent life for themselves.
politicians, and revolutionaries, will not. they are human too, and take care of themselves, whatever they may say..
the workplace is where you work, if lucky enough to have a job. but the nation must belong to all, and be directed by all.
workplace socialism is a nonsense, although there is nothing wrong with co-op work places.
socialism is a condition of the nation. it can only thrive in democracy. so get democracy first. if you can't, learn to live with elites in power. because there has already been enough talk of workplace democracy to know it leads nowhere.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
what you need is democracy. but first you need an education. and a de-toxing, to clean out the myth that what you have is 'democracy.' rule by any elite will benefit the elite, at the expense of the many. if you can understand that, you are on the path to enlightenment.
in reality, i think usans are not crazy, not ignorant, not dim. they see reality, more or less, but are too depressed, and too oppressed, to think salvation is possible. once you are in that condition, there is no hope. for you.
so go on pretending that your politician masters have bad ones and good ones. it's a silly religion, because there is real evidence that politician rule is evil- just look around you at the results. but expecting a kind god up in the sky is also popular, with no evidence at all, so there is no limit to the nonsense people will believe.
gop! oogah-boogah! dem! our salvation!
1
-
1
-
1
-
the taliban are not lovable people. most are presumably narrow, ill-educated farmers with an ak47 and good eyesight. there are a few technicians among them.
not good neighbors. but, how did this come to be? afghanistan was becoming more modern until the cia took a hand, and it turns out that the only remaining resistance to foreign domination was those hard-case farmers. afghanistan was sown by the cia, and i find the resulting sour fruit intensely amusing.
indian participation in the foreign domination was insane, but getting into bed with the usa is understandable. indian politicians are to blame for the vast disparity in development between china and india, and , as usual, foreign war distracts from domestic failure.
pakistan will cultivate trade and protection with china, if only in self-defense, as india is emboldened by usa 'support.' or stimulated by puppet-strings of cash. they have an interest with iran as well. the sunni-shia problem is there, but the paks are not crazy, reality may cause them to be liberal in this area. even the taliban should make this adjustment, but that could be a bridge too far.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
in discussing the features of the constitution he wrote and was promoting, madison was frank, it's purpose was to ensure the rich ruled the usa. it worked, they do. evincing surprise at this late date, can only be wilful ignorance, or cynical misdirection. he said he was creating a polity "for the ages," and deserves respect, for the key features have survived, and another plutocrat is president. only revolution can change the path of the usa in a constructive way, because the people have no formal access to law, and the law-makers have little incentive to listen to voters. recent 'progressive' additions to the house are hopeful. but the plutocrats survived the new deal and veterans benefits, survived total control of government by democrat party, with many socialists in office, and gradually bought back their nation, one politician at a time. the 'new blue wave' is as yet, nothing like as powerful as fdr's congress.
1
-
yer wrong, mr dore, in the world of politicians, 'friend' just means 'colleague' in the profession of politics. if the used the normal sense of sympathetic person, they would have no friends. bernie made a good living out of being 'a champion of the poor,' but politicians are never your friends, like whores, they do it for money, not love.
people who let politicians rule are lacking in self-respect, and probably hire 'love' as well.
40% of the electorate never vote, and have made the most accurate assessment of the value of participation in the usa political myth.
1
-
trump fits the office perfectly. he exemplifies usa culture perfectly. your discomfort arises from the fact that usa was born to be vile, and hasn't improved with age.
but no one in usa notices the smell. raised in a sewer, your collective nose smells nothing. you do notice when a trump doesn't bother to simulate 'virtue,' the nation runs on hypocrisy.
black men being casually gunned down by thugs in uniform is typical of the national culture, not an aberration. murder is done abroad, casually- 'we didn't like him, so we killed him." "we wanted iraq, so we took it. they shouldn't have resisted."
now you are winding up the lumpen-chumps for war, the usual fig-leaf of criminal incompetence at national management. iran, venezuala might be within reach, but the cretins currently infesting the whitehouse actually are threatening china. god help the human race if pompeo is let off the leash to re-elect the orange creature.
1
-
1
-
1
-
umm, usans love profit, right? more profit, more love, right? i f you suddenly discover democracy and socialism is better than oligarchy and capitalism, first you have to change the laws, beginning with the constitution. children want their ice cream right now!, but grown ups have to act with deliberation, unless they are big children, like trump, and many, many others.
1
-
on time or not, the usa will be ruled by politicians, leavened with a narcissistic sociopath. or several, possibly all?.
the standard of national management in the usa is visibly incompetent and corrupt.
worse, the character of the people is weak, magnified by ill education and social myths.
if it weren't for the bloated and aggressive military, everyone would sell usa stocks and bonds, and get into yuan securities.
where is obi-wan when you need him, and no one else is any use?
the usa constitution is obsolete, and was never more than a handle on the nation for the rich, initially slave plantation owners.
the notion of a president is absurd, the qualifications should inspire terror, it's harder to get a car license.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
peaceful, progressive,revolution? the greed orcs have the army, the police, the mass media, and and a large proportion of lumpen bubbas. not only is change unlikely, usa is just going to get worse.
if the west coast and northeast combine, they may have sufficient muscle to secede without war. a long shot.
if successful, bubbaland will be defanged, on the international field.
but usa progressives are not that unified, not that smart, and not that brave. so they will be eaten by the greed orcs, who have the mindless patience that comes to anyone with no interest in anything but wealth and power.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
the dnc is entitled to run their nomination process as they wish. candidates may apply to attend debates, or not. this is not a function of the state.
in retrospect, bernie may wish he had stayed true to his socialist principles, and run a web based independent campaign. but he got in bed with the devil, and delicacy precludes my reporting what happened to him.
more importantly, americans should know they don't live in a democracy. simple experience might tip you off, but the great majority succumb to the national myth, founded on diseducation and simple lies, endlessly repeated.
worse yet, your status as a [optional] work unit is re-enforced by the resulting dimunition in brain capacity.
in short, yer toast. plenty of company, and many live years in mental chains, so don't stir yersellf, the whole nation is sliding down a snow slope with you, and you can chat together and watch the trees flash by. most flash by.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
lies are the bullets before bullets, warfare by propaganda.
people have to figure who is lying, if they are interested in the truth, but many people just want to hear the lies they subscribe to. a very depressing reality.
i am not a great fan of the prc political system, but for now at least, it has delivered a rush towards general prosperity unprecedented in human history. it's very hard to explain that away, although other governments must try to do so. the usa in particular enjoyed a period of general prosperity after ww2, the fruit of ww2 'socialism', and later a period of unmatched military dominance after the collapse of the ussr. they are not used to looking like 'yesterday's men.' but they are, and only lies and sabre-rattleing maintain a shaky front of continuing dominance. this is a period of great danger to the world. as trump demonstrated, and now biden, their national direction is in the hands of incompetents and sociopaths.
cross yer fingers, because sanity is not in charge.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"'hasn't worked out real well," neither reich, nor wolff will face reality. capitalism works very well, for capitalists. and it will continue to do so.
if you don't like the result, you need a different political system. i recommend getting democracy. a nation directed by its citizens, through referendum and initiative, will treat its people well, for they have the power to make it so.
neither reich nor wolff recommend the getting of democracy, i suppose they despise the character of the usa people, and imagine revolution is beyond their capacity. or maybe they just like talking that does not lead to action. in any event, they both are looking for 'the answer' under the street light, where it ain't.
by comparison, with no tertiary degree, mao realized and said, "political power grows out of the barrel of a gun." it took him about 40 years, but he revivified his nation.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
it is an unpleasant truth, not widely accepted, that usans are capable of talking, but short on action, in the national sphere. you could have democracy within a year, if 50 million wanted it. but they don't, do they. if you had democracy, m4a would follow, and much else.
seemingly easy, yet nothing happens. in truth, usa is a nation of slave-minded people, living on their knees to politicians.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
well, the deal is, when japan was beaten, begging for peace, usa demonstrated that they were perfectly willing to use nuclear weapons, and ussr had better keep talking polite.
once ussr, and prc, realized that city-busters were demonstration devices, they were polite.. now they have their own, not as many as usa, but after the first 50, the extras are more of a transfer device, tax-payer->.share-holder.
in case you haven't been paying close attention, there is recent news that a 'dooms-day' submarine has left port into the arctic sea, and shook tracking. this charming device is a mine-layer, apparently it puts down nuclear weapons up-wind of major cities, relying on the wind to dust the target.
slick solution to the crowded-sky, total surveillance problem of ballistic missiles.
1
-
1
-
1
-
economics professors think politics is for others. very wise. no one has an answer for political questions, because the 'i want, get out of the way' aspect is difficult to resolve without gunfire.
of course, economics without politics is somewhat barren - no use pursuing ideas on what should be done, if there is no visible path to change.
nonetheless, clerks beavering away in the public service can sometimes ameliorate the results of the 'i want' policy making.
homer sap is smart enough to destroy the world, not smart enough to save it. 'saving' needs social action, destruction arises from personal drives.
i think it was fermi, who asked, "where are the others?" they probably killed themselves, just as we are doing.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
anyone can say anything, but every word must be passed through the sieve of self-interest.
the retired head of mi6 would be on my short list of people to disbelieve, ab initio..
i can believe putin is showing signs of stress, he has been wrestling with this gamble for months. but coming down on the side of 'shoot' may be his best chance to remain in power.
certainly, usa/nato has long-term plans to occupy eastern europe, blinken just said so. several times. when the evil empire says 'we are coming for you,' why would you disbelieve them?
the play is protracted, the invasion is gentle, as such things are measured. outcome not clear. at best, putin will control the borders and trade, with sporadic bits of violent resistance. but that is a victory, considering the size of the enemy. the evil empire is massively stronger than anyone else. but the orcs in charge won't risk ww3, they might die as well as common people, nuclear weapons being undiscriminating.
vlad has bet his life, and so far, he looks like winning. the longer he looks like winning, the more empty the tough words and threats of usa/nato appear. perhaps xjp will re-evaluate his program for taiwan, as a result.
1
-
1
-
1
-
the fact that plutocracy has returned should inspire revolution. but no public figure says so. usa is a disgusting, decadent, militarist monster, and no one says, "we need a new constitution."
but nothing will be done without revolution. your masters are content, the people do not concern them. why should they act against themselves?
this cheese is ripe for military dictatorship, but the generals are content too. they already enjoy some power, and their chests are covered with trinkets. 'special forces' can count coups without the need for actual war.
and that is why the police are being militarized. they are the army of internal control.
why is usa 'back in the 30's?'
because usa wasn't fixed, back in the 30's, and it won't be fixed now, either.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
comical. i was in it, and after awhile, you realize you are standing on someone else's land, and they aren't gonna quit. america coulda won, without a shot fired. uncle ho wanted to be friends with usa, he wasn't married to the chinese, or even like them, enemies for a thousand years. but he was a 'commie,' and truman wanted to get elected. dumb? not really of course, politicians don't get shot at, that's for the chumps. so here you are 40-odd years later, trying to cozy up to the 'commie vn to contain china, which is turning out to
out-produce usa in new technology.
1
-
1
-
1
-
doesn't anyone realize, the party of the rich is in control? that when the democrats are in control, the rich still rule? trump, or his advisors, noticed that one time dem supporters were very unhappy, and created a political victory out of that unhappiness. i have never heard any politician talk about substantive solution to endemic unemployment from globalization. dems not only allowed it, they failed to notice it. because, they had no answer. to busy smoothing the path of vwallstreet, and printing billions to cover their crimes. trump is an embarrassment in many ways, but he is a signal that the american political system, the constitution, has once again shifted all the national wealth to the rich. nothing new there, but when both parties are parties of the rich, some new party, some new demagogue will seize power with empty promises, just as trump has. he may be a one term president, don't count on it. but he is only the messenger, more will come. have to come, since the structure of the state makes no provision for change without violence.
so enjoy the midterm victory. it's like obama's 'victory'- skillful public speaking, but empty. power remains with the rich, that is what the senate and supreme court is for.
1
-
always nice to hear a voice against the 'great satan,' but prof wolff is not a revolutionary, only a philosopher. not original, either- most of what he has to say was said by chomsky for the last 50 years, with no visible result. as marxists, perhaps wolff and chomsky should have accepted that usa is not ready for revolution, and likely never will be.
but we don't have unlimited time to struggle for justice, since current political conditions seem to be driving the human race over an environmental cliff.
we must preserve earth or die, so struggle is necessary, regardless of the chance of success.
while we are talking about 'what must be done'. we should also be talking about 'how can we do it.'
no use agreeing on what should be done, if you have no power to do it.--- and that is the case today.
which is why i often suggest to get democracy first, use initiative to drive change against the will of the rich and entitled. if you find that democracy is impossible, and have no capability with armed revolution, then you can realize that talk about 'what should be done' is just gossip in the slave quarters.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
when politics is an elite activity, journalism is just gossip. when politics is democratic, journalism is unnecessary, the web age makes journalism obsolete. retrain as a writer of soap opera, a flourishing profession.
there are a lot of muslims in central asia, it should be natural that they connect and conduct their societies together,
pakistan turned its back on india long ago, afghanistan has had enough of cia meddling, both can profit from trade with xinjiand at one end and iran at the other, creating a commercial and military protection from usa meddling.
sadly, indian politicians have decided to chase usa approval. unlikely to be good for india, but politicians everywhere look out for their personal interests first.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
nowadays, usa soldiers are mercenaries, paid to take resources and markets with gun fire. considering the pay you get and the lively possibility of death or horrible crippling and disfigurement, you can see trump's viewpoint, regarding losers and chumps. the truth is, if you are not born the son of a billionaire, in usa you are a loser, and if you play by the rules, you are a sucker.
do not understand why people don't want democracy. imagine the joy of a citizen initiative, in compelling everyone to publish their financial activity, trumps would become extinct!
1
-
well, it is simply psychological engineering. it makes people in the west unhappy, as most are well aware of their social shortcomings, and glad that they private. i would support this kind of engineering if society was a democracy, and all public activities were indeed, public. that would largely prevent abuse. china is not a democracy. neither is any other state, with the limited exception of helvetian confederation.
but, non-democratic though it may be, norway publishes everyone's tax records. a good start on encouraging public spirit through trust, supervised. well done, norway! well done, china too- if you escape abuse of this system. which seems unlikely, chinese people are much like the rest of us.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
putin has been restrained and selective in managing this war. his soldiers, less so. he didn't want to be tsar of ukraine, just wanted a buffer between him and nato. usa/nato says 'we go where we want.'
the problem for putin is, hurting ukraine causes no pain in the dc beltway. indeed, usa can offload munitions indefinitely, may even make a profit.
so someday soon, vlad has to quit kicking the puppet. perhaps he could pour arms into yemen, or venezuela. maybe cuba regrets not getting the missiles still. somewhere in there usa may back off. or we move on to general war.
in short, vlad has options, and very possibly he has a training program in mind, to bring some humility to the usa.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
mr hartmann, and many others, has not grasped the fundamental nature of the usa polity:
it is not a democracy,
it never was.
this is not an accident.
in his promotion of the constitution to the constitutional convention,, madison 'voiced a consideration' of democracy only to dismiss it, as it would lead to the taxes of the rich being spent on the needs of the poor. so he pointed out how his document would prevent this unwelcome result. the management of the state was placed outside the reach of the common people. no referendum, no initiative, politicians would rule as they wished.
elections? meaningless. enough politicians are bought, enough lies are broadcast, to get the result desired by the rich.
sinema is a typical politician, youthful enthusiasm corrupted by money. don't blame 'citizens united' for this situation. politicians have always been bought, lies always told.
the problem is deeper: you are not a citizen of democracy, the power of decision lies not in the hands of the people, but out of reach, and often out of sight.
and deeper still: raised in such a society, you don't think like a citizen, you are submissive to politicians, when you should be yearning to raise their heads, on bloody poles
1
-
your political system is pathetic. a creature like trump should never get near power. how did it happen? not an act of god, not even a con game--- lying is part of the system. the system chugged away and here you are. not clear the alternative would be any better, and the dnc came up with an alzheimer's hack for the next one. how can he lose, right. clinton would have said the same, but.
the constitution is your fundamental problem, it generates the ignorant people, the selfish richos, the venal pollies. fixing your society would be easy, for angels, no others need apply. perhaps if you advertise? "help wanted, angelic powers required?"
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
if you don't have democracy, if you don't want democracy, if you don't know what democracy is, you will be ruled by an elite. sometimes it's the military , sometimes it's a religious structure, sometimes the rich rule, with help or tolerance from generals and priests. commonly it's a mixture of all three, usa is that sort.
aristotle had a word for each for each of the elite rule types, he was smarter and better educated than most americans, and much less indoctrinated by national myths.
he favored democracy, as the best that h. sapiens could manage. the men who shaped the american government, otoh, did not. that is why the constitution establishes 'plutocracy.' madison was rich, his peers governed the state congresses, and together they made a nation ruled by the rich, with a bit of help from generals and preachers.
'outsiders,' such as manning and assange, can point out the hypocrisy and simple lies that keep the commoners in place, but so long as the rich own the media, they end up in jail, or dead. they say they are doing it for the people, but probably not. everyone knows what happens to whistleblowers. more likely whistleblowing satisfies some inner urge of the blower. a magnified verbal 'finger.' meanwhile, the people get on with their lives, for the most part never hearing the whistle, much less picking up a gun and surrounding the dc ring road.
1
-
1
-
1
-
it is a source of continual amusement, that americans refer to their nation as a 'democracy.' it is not, it never was, and that is by design. it was born to protect slavery in the south, expropriation of native lands and, almost incidentally, to escape british taxation. the constitution was not established by "we, the people" but by state congresses in control of the rich, 90% of the men and all of the women were excluded from the vote. there was one state run on democratic principles: rhode island asked its voters about the constitution through referendum, it was rejected.
most of the history they fed you in high school was air-brushed, and most of the history you need to know was never mentioned. which is why americans are chained to plutocracy, simple ignorance, heavily coated with lies. how to escape to reality? here's the good part:
there is no escape. dim, ignorant people don't survive. they need fairy godmothers to lift them up to citizen quality people, and there are none. bummer.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
the swamp is the system. the whole purpose of the system is to free big money from public use, or even, surveillance.
why do you keep talking about democracy, when ordinary people don't even know what's going on, much less have any control over public activity.
madison promised the constitutional convention that his constitution would prevent democracy, and it visibly does.
clearly, no one in the usa understands this, due to a total collapse in study of national history. you can understand why politicians don't like to be reminded of these matters, more disturbing is flight from reality among teachers, and pundits, and bloggers.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
first, who do you trust to tell you the truth? if you have an answer not part of your immediate family, you are a fool. not that most people are not usually truthful, more or less, but you can't put strangers into 'ok', ' not ok' boxes.
so let everyone speak. you figure out which is likely to be lying. fox has its followers, they like what it says. dip in now and then, to reassure your opinion that they are useless. people. but i suggest you should never trust anyone who says, "just listen to me!" unless you like what fox says. and if it's a government who says, don't listen to them!' despise the government, and fear it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
nothing was solved in the 30's. bandaids were applied, until tojo and hitler invigorated the economy with rage.
what defeats corporate plutocracy? nothing.
plutocracy is the principle on which the fundamental laws of the nation are built, and until the constitution is scrapped, nothing useful will happen. there will be change, dictatorship is on the horizon, but there is no future there.
how to create a future? simple. but apparently impossible. none of the talking heads raise the possibility that usa was built to deliver plutocracy, and so a new construction is necessary.
and that is why all the talk has been, and is fruitless.
for all his flaws, mao hit on one timeless reality:
political change is the transfer of power from one group to another, and power is not talk, it is the application of force.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
the dnc is not your friend. fortunately, doesn't matter a great deal who is president, china rising e. u. splitting, only good news lately is bolivia coup, and that;s a mixed blessing, as the whole world knows what happened, and didn't quite happen in venezuela.
turns out, mr hopeandchange is planning to run again, as a republican, while mrs. clinton is planing to run again as a fascist. really, this crop of actual candidates is a bit bland. i guess that's what 'progressive' means in modern usa.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
no point in discussing legality, in dealing with the usa government. they make their own rules, as they go. murder, invasion, collateral damage, all in the book. consequently, resistance of any nature is ethical, in a struggle for survival. julian assange, for personal reasons, entered into war with the usa government, struck some heavy blows but appears to have ended his struggle in captivity. not clear yet.
being concerned about the nature of his struggle, 'was this real journalism?' is absurd. the struggle against tyranny is not a game, and there are no rules.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
of course the dnc is trying to direct voting result, that's their business. but the usa is not a democracy, madison said his constitution would create a plutocracy, and it has. voting for people is not democracy, it is non-violent civil war to determine which gang of aristocrats will rule for awhile. they need money, to scam the chumps who believe the nonsense about democracy, so the rich get their wishes done, hence, "plutocracy."
ms gabbard is no better- she wants to be one of the 'aristocrats.' people who want real change are plotting revolution. there are probably dozens of them, with secret handshakes. nothing will happen in the usa, but the organic decay built into every human society ruled by elites, which is nearly all of them.
the sad truth is, you can't have democracy without citizen quality people, and such people do not develop often in elite societies.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
this is where hedges fails, in my view: he is well-aware of the injustice in usa society, and speaks with knowledge and passion about it, but he accepts it, he talks of rebellion but has no plan to offer, that will change america. and yet, effective rebellion is easy. it just needs a large minority of the electorate to send the same email to the dnc, and local dem candidates, every monday morning:
"i will not again vote for the democratic party until party policy is to amend the constitution to create an effective and accessible power of citizen initiative, making the electorate the sovereign power of the nation."
this is non-violent revolution, a transfer of power from an elite group, politicians in office, to the citizens of the nation. it might not work. if it doesn't, abandon hope, or arm yourselves and advance on dc.
my own view is that americans are not citizen quality people, and are incapable of concerted action. that's why chomsky speaks without passion- he knows from long experience, that americans wear mental chains. hedges hasn't learned this yet. chomsky has no hope, hedges hasn't lived long enough.
1
-
1
-
the virtue of democracy is that everyone gets to vote on individual issues, should school be free, yes or no. should we resist invasion, yes or no. and so forth. but usa is not a democracy, you only get to vote on who should rule us, for awhile. this inevitably results in a gang mentality among those who actively contend for power, and a passive ignorant mob of those who see no advantage in participating in that struggle for power.
this national character is not unique, it is commonplace. usa however is burdened with an inflexible constitution which has been all too successful in empowering the rich against the mob. usa consequently has been badly managed from birth. it is, or at least has been, the most powerful society for about 150 years due only to its resources, space and unthreatened boundaries. but the world has moved on, madison's constitution now delivers absurd leadership by comparison with its competitors.
so usa is doomed, china will surpass it, europe may surpass it, even india might. see russia for a likely next stage.
and these macro concerns make most usan political discussion trivial. like those medieval churchmen who were reported to concern themselves on the number of angels dancing on pinheads, usans can not lift their gaze and ask important questions.
too be fair, i suspect many ask trivial questions because they fear the important ones are unsolvable and threatening.
1
-
1
-
1
-
let's boycott usa at olympics because of: vietnam, iraq, chile, el salvador, afghanistan, and many more - chomsky has a list, about 100 crimes.
i have to believe that the character of the usg is related to the character of the people, not all, but most. so change is near impossible.
and of course, other governments are about the same, within their capacity to do evil. it's just that usa is the biggest monster. homer sap has beaten all the animals, and holds its own against disease, but controlling itself is too hard. extinction is the likely result.
1
-
1
-
1
-
homer sap got in the habit of doing what the biggest monkey said long ago, and with the assistance of his beta hench-monkeys, that gorilla has been keeping himself in maximum comfort ever since.
since alpha and betas suffer last and least, they are not inclined to worry about us.
we eventually invented democracy, as a concept, but have not been effective at installing it. too bad - it would be the saving of us as a species. it's the only way to get things done for the common good, and it seems out of reach.
scientists have wondered, publicly, why we don't hear radio signals from critters living on other planets. turns out, it's quite simple: shortly after getting radios, we burn down the planet.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
usa gummint is the usual sort, staffed by sociopaths and nudged by narcissist plutocrats. that's homer sap for you..
the plebs get on with their lives, however they can. it's getting harder lately, because the rich are maintaining or expanding their take from the national income, while the national income is under pressure from prc and other resistant nations, notably iran and russia.
only an active, large and well-organized popular movement can shake the status quo, none in view. usa peeps are ignorant, cowed, genuinely desperado. whence the endemic crime and occasional mass murder.
i wouldn't give a damn, except the looming climate crisis threatens every living thing on earth, and the orcs who run usa are making it worse.
anyone who is remotely surprised by this bolton brag simply hasn't been paying attention. the classical greeks had a word for it, that's where we get 'idiot.'
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
india is not in china's pocket, nor is anyone else. people who are unhappy with usa will smile at prc now and then, as a means of resisting usa plans, or aggression. a relatively healthy situation, which may prevent another iraq invasion, or afghanistan occupation. iran may even hope that public association with prc will prevent israeli bombs and raids.
the people of the usa tolerate a sociopathic government, which conducts foreign affairs with raids, bombs and the occasional invasion.
while constantly referring to 'american democracy.' which is not democracy at all. the people do not rule, or even know what is being done, in their name. this says something shameful about usa character. lincoln freed the slaves, but still they are not masters of their nation, just civilians, or less politely, chumps.
no great shame in it, homer sap nowhere impresses. but usans do not use their vote to rebel. a 10% turn-out would begin to re-mold usa behavior, voting only for unaffiliated locals would help, too.
but they don't. either chumps, or creeps. and their masters are a danger to racial survival. indeed, between looming war and accelerating climate collapse, usa is the starring actor in the sterilization of the planet.
1
-
you won't look in the dark, and the answer is not in the light.
get democracy, and socialism will follow. madison said so, which is why the constitution is not that of democracy.
until you face reality, you can't change it. it will need another 20 years and mass impoverishment,* before someone
stands up and says,' let's march. bring yer gun.'
usually that results in simple classic tyranny. china was lucky, they just got a new dynasty, red mandarins, which so far is much better. usa won't be lucky, no respect for political theory - the guy who stands up likely to be some semi-literate hay-seed.
* assume for the support of hope, that climate change is under control. real possibility that political action no longer of use.
1
-
1
-
as far as i know, only helvetia maintains a reasonable approximation of democracy, and it is visibly corroding under the stress of e.u. encirclement.
greece, otoh, doesn't pretend. everyone in the west is told daily that rule by politicians is 'democracy.' but the word itself gives them the lie: it means a society 'ruled by the citizens.' california would be a very good approximation of a democracy, if independent: referendum, initiative direct the state in large matters, and in constant use.
a few other usa states come close, but elsewhere, the people do not rule. and they are not really citizens, civilian would be polite.
you would think a notable greek would understand these distinctions, but yf found the greek state to small a stage for his talents, and contents himself with being a celebrity 'international.'
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
no. a bad decision can get made any time one person decides, even in consultation. especially if done in a hurry. so, the smaller the decision group, the shorter the time, the more danger.
another charm of democracy. my standard is the swiss: surrounded by the axis, when informed by hitler that he was sending a management team to integrate c.h. into the axis, three things happened:
first, general commanding swiss militia called first response cohort to action stations.
second, national administration formulated a referendum, saying, "shall we comply?"
third, two weeks later the citizens replied , "no!"
you could say the time was short, but the question was simple. 4 languages, 3 cultures, all voted more than 95% no!
consequently, even when conditions got difficult, food short, bombs and bullets occasionally flying from all directions, the swiss never worried about their compatriots, all were swiss, and those very few who weren't were easily dealt with. i should mention, the 'citizens' were men 18 +, they took the athenian view that the fighters and diers should decide things. but they are more civilized now. they are also strangely prosperous for a nation with no natural resources but ski slopes.
but usa has the worst possible government style: elective aristocracy---- .sclerotic, short-sighted, and greedy. usa could easily wander into an extinction decision, in fact, you already have. flying the flag of 'capitalism' ,' guarantees extinction, on a finite planet. but this is not solely trump's decision. an entire national culture is running towards a cliff.
1
-
1
-
1
-
don't blame the democrats- the weak link is visible in every mirror. democracy is rule by the people, and you ain't got it. and you don't want it, too much trouble to get it. might be fighting and dying involved, and certainly a lot of name-calling. and yer too busy. the usa was designed to be run by the rich, and the design was good, not least in creating a society that looks out for itself, and devil take the losers.
it's not a matter of biden vs bernie, or even trump vs anyone. it's a matter of "who decides?"* - shall it be the will of the citizens, or the decision of politicians.
*aristotle figured this out, thousands of years ago, and you still don't know. talk about 'mortal ignorant,' or what?
1
-
1
-
1
-
no, mr janssen, what is good for america is good for america. the rest of the world sends very few children to international meetings. usa continues to have a following, because nations may profit from the scraps, or rulers take protection from submission to usa.
i do what i can to remind the world, that 'democracy' has a meaning, and it is nothing like what is practiced by the usa, at home and certainly has no international application at all.
the tide is turning, and it is no longer immediately fatal to reject usa demands. a few who do are murdered, and many are bought, but resistance has reached self-sustaining levels.
it is unfortunate that the two major nations resisting usa hegemony are themselves oligarchies, russia might even be a dictatorship, but the moral standing of the usa elective oligarchy is no better.
homo sapiens has touched democracy, but it clearly is not natural, and i suspect we will destroy our world before we get there. in the meantime, it seems best to support the less bad nations, prc and russia..
by the way, your nation murders people who oppose them. it is foolish to suggest that others have rights, while the cia is a licensed killer.
1
-
1
-
1
-
it's not rape when american companies beg to be allowed to produce and sell in china. you could say it's selling out the american middle class, but that's their own fault. too lazy to get rich, too lazy to join the military, to lazy to sell drugs, or their daughters. while trump is a truly contemptible human being, he also is perfectly representative of the american elite, aside from not bothering to hide his contempt for everyone else. but not unique, there, either.
america was born to preserve the wealth of slave plantation plutocrats, and it did until the civil war. then it served to defend the wealth of industrial and mining plutocrats, just as it now defends bankers. the constitution defends wealth- period. it was designed that way.
american reverence for the constitution is a cosmic joke, one which is wearing a little thin.
1
-
1
-
if yer high school history class was worth a damn, they would have shown you how the usofa gummint was designed to be run by and for the rich. there's no secret about it, as madison had to persuade the state gummint grandees to accept his proposed constitution. when they were assured they would profit from the new constitution, they voted to establish.
it begins "we, the people..." but that was just the first lie, ordinary people were not consulted, except in rhode island, by referendum. they refused to accept, until all the other states had done so, by congressional action. it turns out, usa 'we, the people' are chumps, then and now.
1
-
1
-
usa is a contemptible nation. i didn't realize it until i was grown. i suppose most nations try to lie to their children, although brown kids, especially poor, brown kids probably learn reality pretty young.
but it is the most powerful military nation , by far, and likely to kill at any scale, in search of money, or simply to preserve fear, so other nations do not evince contempt, and many are just as bad, within their limited capabilities.
homer sap invented morality, ethics and law, so that we could live together and dominate nature, and that worked, roughly. but even there, natural savagery is likely to end us, unable to leash greed and arrogance even in defense of our environment.
poor julian. something wrong with that man's head, to assault the lies of the usg without any attempt at concealment. what did he think was going to happen? did he imagine the people of the usa would applaud his efforts and protect him?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
you start as a gofer, when they think you can be trusted with the coffee money, you are promoted to 'stategist 1. allowed to offer in- house opinions. when you clearly have the song-book memorized, you can be a strategist 2, with actual pay. then you are allowed to speak at friendly and simple-minded sites. et cetera. [haven't seen one of those in awhile, have you. ]
aoc has decided she likes being a politician. it's like working in a whore house, you gotta be flexible. and that's all you are entitled to expect of her- she ain't a revolutionary, and you ain't gonna fix usa from within congress. no one in the usa seems to have decided to fix the usa, no visible signs of revolution as yet, most seem to think just changing faces will do it. or so they say. in the age of gig economy, making a living by talking about something has infested politics.
it's not really lying when you need to lie, to go on eating.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
populism is what happens when the elite groups need to appeal to plebs for support. it doesn't happen in democracy, because the citizens have control of the state.
call it the sickly sibling of democracy, the one that can only cheer from the sidelines, in a wheel-chair.
in any event, the appearance of bloomberg as the anointed child of the nominally 'people's party' is genuinely amusing, i would underline the fact that gore vidal put it well, when he remarked that 'the usa has a right-wing party, and a farther right-wing party,' but at the same time, it is futile to talk about reality in a nation so blinded by myth and concerted lies.
even if bernie gets in, folks, yer toast. there is no one in public life who has a clue about how to save a nation whose ship of state was aimed towards a distant reef at launching, with no means to change course.
1
-
1
-
in the early 60's, kruschev got tired to usa nuclear missiles parked in turkey, so he did a deal with castro and began shipping missiles to cuba. kennedy was sane, and secretly promised to close down the missile threat from turkey. and the missile-bearing ships turned around.
but nowadays, usa masters are desperate, and must have new markets to support military,
and corporate profits. so they buy a government of ukraine, and vlad says, "basta!"
poor finland is uncomfortably close to this scene, and have never been close to russia emotionally. not even nodding friends. so they are easily bought. can't blame them. in actual fact, they could stay out of nato and flourish, putin doesn't look for trouble. still, nato might be seen as insurance.
of course, joining the other team will lead to fatal consequences, if the bombs start to fly.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Listen up,sheeple! This here paddock is yearn, the grass and water is, not the land. See those fence posts, stay inside untill the truck comes for you. Now get out there and eat, whole world loves fat lambs.
That's economics, money in, more money out. But putting up fences and controlling the life within is politics. You live in a society where you are sheep, politicians are sheepdogs and they follow whistles and hand signals from the rich. If you eliminate the sheepdogs and replace the rich, you won't be rich, but you will be citizens in a democracy. Socialism follows and everyone eats, at least. The reason socialism gets nowhere is because socialists don't grasp the necessity of getting power first.
1
-
this discussion presupposes that candidates are acting for the public good. for any children with an unhealthy interest in usa politics, not the case! some are here for the fun of it, got a few hundred million to spend, and some free time. some are here for brand enhancement, angling for a cabinet post. now and then, yang comes to mind, they see the nation being badly managed and have few suggestions they want to press, without any chance of getting nominated.
chillun, don't believe what you hear, little of what you see. this is all verbal pole dancing, to confuse and mystify the voters. biden, leading any poll? ay, caramba!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
neither party was ever any kind of political party beyond a device to get power and make money from it. most parties are like that, they only differ in the demographic they appeal to for power. the democratic party began as the political agent of the slave plantation grandees, slipped into impotence through the civil war, and eventually recovered power by collecting the votes of the dispossessed of the '29 depression. but they were not troubled by principle: as the demographic center of the nation shifted towards middle-class prosperity, they abandoned the poor. now it suits them to move further up again.
this strategy evolves naturally from the electoral laws of the nation. it has nothing to do with any principle of management. it is entirely a vote-gathering tactic:
be just like the other guy in all important matters, and more centrist in a few unimportant matters.
gop could do this too, but haven't been willing to throw scraps to the poor or middles. trump may have broadened their minds, we'll see in 2022.
you are not entitled to better management of your nation. if you are too dim, ignorant and lazy to demand democracy, with menace, you will be ruled by some elite.
no elite will treat you better than cattle, either get off your knees or get used to pain.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
you can't have a sensible conversation if you don't understand the fundamental laws of the nation. the usa is not a democracy. lincoln lied. the nation is not ruled 'by the people.' it was the intent of james madison that there be a political structure of elected aristocrats who were themselves rich, or working for the rich. he said precisely that, in promoting his constitution to the grandees of state government, who decided to establish the federal government with those characteristics. only rhode island resisted.
the key feature of the constitution is that the people have no power to direct or legislate, as that would inevitably lead to the taxes of the rich being spent on the concerns of the poor.
as usually happens, the rich get richer, the poor more numerous and the society collapses. this happened in 1929, and the usa was pulled back from collapse by ww2. we are now in the second 'gilded age' and there is no prospect of rescue. normally the military take over at this point, after civil war breaks out.
there is nothing to be done, the ship of state was never in the control of the people, and the rich are too rotten to save themselves, and the nation. even referring to 'democracy' in america reveals a staggering level of national ignorance, not just of history, but of current reality.
1
-
sanders is the token lefty, toothless and not very bright. doesn't realize 'getting along' with evil just makes evil stronger. or more likely, 'hey, it's a living.'
in any event, he ain't gonna save democracy, by legitimizing the rule of the rich.
first, usa has to learn, that democracy is the rule of the citizens, not politicians. no sign of that happening.
second, must accept that transferring power from politicians to citizens will not happen through polite discussion.
the second amendment was explicitly inserted in the constitution to allow for instruction of elites at gunpoint. it ain't there to protect your deer-hunting. have you figured it out, yet?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
i remember a time when i was young, when an army flack announced at the day's 'follies,' that they had to kill everyone in the village, to save it from communism. they were only vietnamese people, didn't count.
so these events in texas come as no surprise. usa is the evil empire, infested with sociopaths, many in office. what is a bit unusual at this event, the evil comes from not shooting.
so tell me, is anyone gonna lose their job, at least? this texas cop force should be disarmed, stripped of uniform, and branded on the forehead.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
it's funny- while china was interdicted from world trade, it was poor, now they are dominating world trade, and they are cheats. chavez had one real weak point- usa hated him. he was chummy with fidel, how dare he! i think the management of china has been so superior to usa that the koch brothers fear they may not be able to transfer their inherited wealth to the next generation. it's melting, with the usd - yuan ratio. the petrodollar has been brilliantly successful, but saudi is becoming a stench on the world scene and is no longer a reliable base of worth. venezuela would be a valuable successor, more oil and close at hand. maduro is the only blot- he won't go quietly. maybe he won't go at all- the castros rode out 8 presidents, and are not quite done yet.
history is worth knowing, it often is valuable to understanding the present and near future. which is why elites commonly expunge it from the record. trump is not in office because of his virtues. he is there because of the corruption in the democratic party. instead of educating the people, empowering the people, they joined the republicans in keeping them ignorant and powerless. so the best new people in congress are democrats, the party of betrayal of the people. not a hopeful sign.
the new progressives may do some good, the electorate is hungry for a better share of the american pie, but i am not hopeful. none of them have suggested establishing democracy. so even if there is some progress today, the rich will ride it out, and buy back their nation tomorrow. it's happened before.
1
-
that's the difference between democracy and elective oligarchy. in the first, the chickens make the big decisions. in the second, the oligarchs decide. in both cases, those who decide, profit. so, do you want the majority of people to prosper, however modestly, or do you want the gangsters to profit, as much as they can steal?
and they do steal, quietly when convenient. lately, the character of the chickens has become so despised that the foxes are being blatant.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
you might think learning that biden is crooked too, just not with the inherited advantages of trump, would lead americans to the notion that relying on the probity of politicians is a chump's plan. but you'd be wrong. no one ever examines the structure of american society, considers its history and founders, and concludes that democracy is necessary. who was it, that suggested that expecting different results from continual failures, is a working definition of insanity? i've forgotten and its not important, because he was wrong. there are at least two reasons, and stupidity is most common. national insanity is possible, but when 'progressives' don't catch on either, you have to wonder if fluoridation has clipped the top off the gene pool.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
do not complain about public speech. how else will you know what they are thinking? or lying, about, at least.
the nation that started with a declaration that ' all men are created equal ' spoken by a group who profited by the labor and trading of slaves is not entitled to evince horror or contempt at the current conduct of public affairs. the usa was born evil. since most of the people in 'private prisons' are brown, and/or poor, work for cigarette money wages, change is less than you imagine.
as in every nation, the people who are born into usa do not appreciate the view from elsewhere. you speak of democracy constantly, but nowhere in the foundation law is there any mention of the word, nor any mechanism for the will of the people to direct the nation. 'democracy' from your mouth is a myth. your armies are widely spread, bring death as 'special forces,' without declaration of war, only expressions of desire for dominance. 'peace' from your lips is a sick lie.
'free speech' is a jewel, but it is of little use to a populace of powerless civilians. you must get citizen initiative, before you can be a citizen. if you are content to be ruled by the elite of wealth, 'free speech' is just the whining of children, and it will be curtailed, if it ever looks like causing trouble to your masters.
1
-
1
-
1
-
non-voters are 'woke.' unlike moore, they know that voting for politicians just leads to more misrule, by politicians. it's what got usa to where it is. i suppose he means well, but his enthusiasm is misplaced. usa needs a revolution, not another election. it will happen. maybe democracy will result, unlikely. much more likely, some general will 'rescue' america from politicians. this is the best americans can hope for, due high incidence of ignorance. many, for instance, think they have 'democracy.' james madison told them otherwise, the entire history of usa tells them otherwise, but still they don't know. that's not ignorance alone, that's also malevolent diseducation. but mother nature doesn't care, dumbnosity leads to extinction too.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
bernie has to get all the 'left' support, and it has to be about 45% of the total, because the rest of the field is 'right,' he'll be lucky to pick up another 6% from them. meanwhile, back in the usa, there's a whole world of lumpen troglodytes who froth when they hear 'socialist,' except for a few who just throw a box of shells in the pick-up and start driving towards where ever bernie is. no 'left' votes there. and there's a back-up plan, with a 'lone gun man,' a cut-out shooter, and a cia budget expense item, something like 'account maintenance.'
usa politics is endlessly interesting, a bit of tom clancy, a bit of john sandford, and lots of 'wizard of oz.'
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
beto is a light weight, who sees no reason why he shouldn't be president. after dubya and trump, who can say he is wrong. but if you must vote for a king, please give andrew yang some attention. he's the only candidate so far that has shown me brains, experience, even wisdom, and hasn't got into the spotlight with dark money, since he and his friends got lots, and not by inheritance nor theft. they actually made money with smarts. he highlights the difference with trump by noting he is asian and can do math. i would add, trump turned billions into millions, yang actually made money.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
employers want workers for just as long as they have work to do. workers want a predictable working life, with adequate pay and conditions.
a primitive society, such as usa, resolves this dilemma with constant struggle between the parties, generally leading to immiseration of the workers and collapse of society.
if homer sap wants to survive on a planet with limited resources and limited environmental resilience, he must develop a society based on democracy, and resulting socialism.
so far, little indication of any capacity to achieve these conditions.
you are doomed! as a species, very possible. as a civilization, certainly. but as individuals, go on talking, action can be left to the survivors, if any.
1
-
1
-
1
-
usa will encourage anyone to fight, and sell them guns to do it. they don't get too involved in ukraine, because putin scares them. taiwan is a bigger prize, and prc has no recent track record in military prowess. the downside of civilization, quite unlike usa. so usa politicians 'visit,' making their bones as the mafia put it, raising election funds thereby, and perhaps a few votes as well.
fortunately for humanity, xi jinping has a plan for taiwan which includes not trashing the place. it is, after all, part of china, and a valuable one. he thinks 'not shooting' will win the war. and he is ceo of a society of bureaucrats capable of long term plans. quite unlike usa.
i recently indulged in a metaphor on the situation, usa is a dangerous fighting bull, xjp the matador. the bull will die, the matador probably not. but there will be a show of horn-dodging and bandillerros first, hold yer breath!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
if you want a society that is responsive to the needs of most of its people, i have good news: there is such a society, it is called 'democracy.' democracy is responsive to the needs of most of its people because 'most of its people' are masters of the nation. simple, innit. why would you tolerate anything else?
why is simple, too: elites control police and army, and education and public information. 'most of its people' are alienated individuals. think 'ranchers' and 'cattle,' and you have the human tragedy.
in the prc, the elite is currently dominated by a man who has some personal experience with life at the bottom of chinese society, and who is trying to spread the benefits of society more equally. fragile, indeed. yet better by far than the situation in developed nations. there wealth and political power are largely unconcerned with the commoners.
covid is only a serious problem because of the blip in the economy caused by large numbers of ill people. the death rate is unremarkable. it will not change 'capitalist' nations, because they are merely nations owned by the greedy. the greedy are here to stay. it is an economic disease of homo sapiens.
the cure is in politics, not medicine nor economics. get democracy, and greed can be controlled.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
this is nature's remorseless plan: old, slow, young or dumb die first, improving the gene pool. now, you may be surprised that this 3rd world reality operates in the usa, but that just demonstrates you are in the 4th category.
democracy, and resulting socialism, is easy to figure out, and easy to get. but it does need citizen quality people.
and there's the problem. assuming that usa is not a notably defective gene pool, just for the moment, this nation is a clear demonstration that if you raise kids to be ignorant and selfish, that's the kind of grown-ups you get.
the usa elite knows this, and that's why usa public education is crap.
what to be done?
enter 'vanguard party.' mixed results there. modern russia better by far than tsarist russia, low bar, eh?
otoh, modern china is powering ahead, so much so that usa elite has abandoned seduction and shifted into confrontation. that ain't gonna work either.
can there be a vanguard party, in usa? no visible evidence. you are just too dumb. i blame james madison. a genuinely evil man, set usa on a path to destruction. i think the indians say 'karma?'
1
-
you don't have rights. only members of the ruling class have rights. the great majority of usans have privileges, as children do. they are not citizens of a democracy, they are civilians in an oligarchy.
privileges are flexible, at the convenience of the masters.
only in a democracy do the people become citizens, the ruling class. didn't they teach political science in your school?
in modern times, only the swiss have democracy. they decided not to submit to the nazis by referendum. they were an island of freedom in a sea of military dictatorship, by choice of the citizens.
the people of the usa are not of that quality. they submit to injustice because they are born in it, and raised on a diet of lies. rebellion may happen, but revolution needs more than rage, and the middle class is more concerned with holding their declining share of national wealth than with organizing revolution. they watch the degradation of the poor with averted eyes, hoping not to join them. but they will, and soon.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
war seems inevitable, as usa has achieved military superiority over any other nation, and its ruling clique has lost any sense of personal risk.
in this condition, putin has made the right decision, simply because it would be senseless to allow any further economic success to the usa.
if you must fight, fight when you are strongest.
russia can not conquer usa, but can do sufficient damage to make the usa rulers wonder if their own personal bunkers will survive, their own wealth turned into historical curiosity.
so far, things have gone well for vlad. usa/nato has confined their reaction to economic action, which leaves vladimir unblooded and deserving of some admiration from those like me, who enjoy watching successful resistance to the evil empire.
this issue will not be resolved quickly.
ukraine was being used by the usa for the development of bio-weapons.
there is a public and active element of neo-nazis in ukraine.
this creates a 'clear and present danger' to russia, which might excuse the current military incursion.
blinken's statement threat 'nato can go where it wants' is nothing less than a declaration of war. nato is, i remind you, a military union of states against ussr, and has continued as an implement of forceful expansion even after ussr dissolved.
vlad knows what he's doing, and has probably made the right response. he's clearly not sleeping well, since he is very much the underdog, in his struggle with the evil empire. 'right response' as may be, success or even survival not certain.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
you don't have to guess, madison wrote that his constitution didn't need amendments, jefferson insisted, he would not support the establishment without the bill of rights. so, madison said, 'ok, can't hurt.'
jefferson thought a state militia could resist a national army, with support from other states. he was right, at the time.
this is in history books, but i came across it in '52, so can't point which one.
1
-
when are usans going to admit that they do not live in a democracy. that's a rhetorical question, no question mark. never, appears to be the answer.
so long as you submit to the rule of politicians, this is what you get, and deserve.
democracy is possible. but it needs citizen quality people.
they seldom occur, in an oligarchy.
in an oligarchy, people grow up with a submissive character, never imaging that ordinary people can run a nation. a 'catch-22' situation, oldies would say.
but, begging your masters for kindness never works, and they always fall farther into corruption of character, leaving behind any sense of fairness or duty.
so finally there there will be brutal repression, because no one gives up power easily. this wouldn't matter, but this time over-population makes poor social management fatal.
if you are young, you may wish to organize a revolution. the oldies aren't going to leave a livable space.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
another good feature of democracy, is that no one is above the law. but usa is an elective monarchy, and the president is "commander-in-chief." you can see why many would think trump is untouchable. in the end, every nation is ruled by its army. in a democracy, the army is the citizens. but the usa is not a democracy. so it comes down to, which general will have the support of his colleagues? and will he pretend to 'advise' the president, or put him in jail.
fortunately for trump, the democratic party is complicit in the crimes of the usg, interested chiefly in personal power, and will not rock the boat enough to legitimize the adjudication by generals. it might come to trump getting on a plane to 'farawayandoutofreach-istan' if the generals get involved. and of course, once the generals realize that a despised politician guild will not be supported by the people, they are in power forever.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
it's quite simple: elites are voracious, they have no sense of limits, and think sharing is for morons. they will destroy the environment and be content so long as they profit from it.
homer sap can only counter this human social depravity by getting democracy, and using it to establish balance with the natural world.
so far, getting democracy has been out of reach, and homer doesn't even see the need or use for struggle. population collapse will result, and if soon enough, it may prevent total extinction. but scientists have long been remarking at the total lack of evidence of life on other planets, so it seems possible that getting control of the environment just leads to extinction.
not today, or in my lifetime, but if i were young i would struggle for democracy, and/or thin out the sociopaths who infest positions of wealth and power. they are a clear and present danger.
1
-
1
-
1
-
i didn't have to travel far to learn what usa 'freedom' is. i just joined the air force, and they took care of the travel. like most of the ground crew, i never was shot at. but, as a radio monitor, mandarin and vietnamese, i got some idea of what our guys were up to. occasionally, the ugly reality leaked into public view, you probably heard about 'mylai.'
about 350 viets were gathered up from their village and machine-gunned. the grunts involved were not charged with murder, they were discharged instead. an officer did a couple of years 'confined to quarters' and then released.
why was mass murder treated so lightly? because it was commonplace, and part of the command direction of the war. every officer from 1st lieutenant to westmorland should have been hanged, if the munich standards were applied.
so i am not a civilian of the usa any more. leave if you can, you are living in a moral hell hole.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
there is a famous saying in the military world, that attack plans only last to the first contact.
in fact, with some adjustment, the german plan worked quite well for about 3 months. well done!
there is more to war than battle. munitions production, quality of serving military personnel, and number and quality of replacements are also vital.
with the available appreciation of sov assets, hitler/high command decided that time was on the side of the soviets. but the earliest available date was sept 1. if it had been jun 1, the world might be a much different place.
but they were busy elsewhere.
it is wrong to say they made a mistake. war is not chess. they took on an enemy that proved to be stronger, following political imperatives arising from hitler's demand for lebensraum, facilitated by his successful guess that france would be a push-over, and leave time for barbarosa. the mistake was in dreaming of a german empire, and even that was not out-landishly wrong. execution was as good as human abilities could deliver - even when losing the germans were better soldiers, better led than opponents.
they were beaten by inadequate numbers, inferior production, with a bit of help from the russian winter.
indeed, arriving in front of moscow in summer uniform by itself meant the game was up.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
don't get excited. bernie is not a democrat, and the dnc will stop him if they can. and they can: they could simply ignore his pluralities and hand the nomination to one of the other candidates. the dnc wants the usa to be a wholly owned nation of the politician caste- it is in their self-interest. bernie is an embarrassment, seeking office without dnc support. if he wins, their income drops.
worse, if he wins, it will be a barren victory, both parties will ignore his attempts at legislation. i think it will be best if he is nominated, and loses.
best for the nation, best for the planet. there is going to be a second 'great depression' soon. better by far that trump is in office. the person who picks up the pieces will likely be andrew yang, backed by enthusiastic supporters in both houses. and the depression may save the planet, due to greatly reduced economic activity.
something to think about, a comfort if things don't appear to go well for bernie.
1
-
mr hedges is a national treasure. like chomsky, he is rolled out by various [would-be] pundits from time to time, to show that usa public figures are capable of sane, responsible analysis of current events.
but so what? almost all usans are dispossessed of political consequence, by law, custom and ignorance, and respond by ignoring politics, leaving the rich and their political agents to use the nation as an engine of personal wealth and position.
you can't have a democracy without citizen quality people, so hedges and chomsky labor in vain, and without hope, written on their faces. they are a living shame to all that hear them, and do not create revolution.
less dramatically, the course of empire is not affected by prophets, it is driven by greed and arrogance, so revolution needs desperadoes, people who have nothing to lose, and a burning drive to change things. usans cling to the edge of survival, because the culture has dissolved any comradeship and concerted effort is impossible.
1
-
1
-
many people think trump is incompetent, but they are wrong. inheriting great wealth, a sociopath character, and an iq of about 90, it naturally took him a long, long time to find his metier, which it turns out, is to be president of the usa. usa was in deep trouble before he came to office, it is quite simply corrupt and decaying. this is not trump's fault. he hasn't improved things, of course, but nor could anyone else. trump in fact perfectly embodies usa, from bloated body, to 3rd rate mind. boasting and lies have been characteristic of usan public figures from the birth of the nation, trump is very much in the national tradition. gore vidal could have made an additional career just commenting on this cartoon figure of usa. but there is nothing to be gained by pointing out trump's flaws, except the new cottage-industry of using the web to gossip for coins thrown by viewers. voltaire and swift made something of this art, their like has not yet appeared .
the alternative presented by the opposition party was hillary clinton. if you are sure she would have been better, i pity you.
thinking americans, with education and experience, should be publicly canvassing the support for a new constitution. nothing less will save you from russia's fate.
not sure there are any, but possibly the intelligent response to conditions in the usa is to be silent preparatory to emigrating.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
scientists conning politicians? next the pope will be selling get-out-of-hell cards to anyone who feels the need. homo sapiens, yer shameless.
i should add, dr h does a clear and suitably simple survey of where nuclear power generation is, right now. if homer sap was in charge of his local national entity, he could make an informed vote at referendum time, or participate in an initiative. but homer is not, outside of helvetia. so what is the use of public education?
nowadays it is direct funding of scientists, such as dr h. nothing like it when i was young.
used to be scientists had to be very polite to power, now, less so. on balance, a good thing.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
for a long while, the swiss 'army' was the swiss citizens, armed and uniformed. by no coincidence, the swiss was the only nation that was a functioning democracy, and only fought in defense of the nation.. the situation is less clear nowadays.
every one else* has a professional military, usually under nominal control of a political group. often they conscript soldiers as needed, avoiding expense and civilian unrest between wars.
in the usa, in principle, the army does what it is told to do. and they don't complain, so long as they are doing killing, with few casualties. but sometimes people interject an aspect of efficiency, or even ethics. this is silly. you are not defending the nation, you are killing people on the orders of a politician.
in my lifetime, usa has given up all pretense to ethical behavior. they have always been bandits, the battle hymn of the marine corps was a list of their more presentable raids, invasions and occupations.. but now, they simply create new language to explain the necessity and regrettable violence used in spreading the usa imperium.
i feel a little sorry for this soldier. he has had his nose rubbed in the character of the people he kills for. it's embarrassing. he thought he could get by with skill and courage, but it turned out, if you work for the mafia, leave your conscience in a little box in the attic, it'll just get in the way of your profession.
* almost forgot costa riica! they very wisely stay out of sight.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
you can't expect politicians [or stand-up comics ] to lead a revolution. they are doing very nicely from 'things as they are.'
only revolution can turn around the ship of state. doesn't have to be violent, if the politicians agree to put themselves out of power, but they seldom do.
the real problem is, less than half of usa knows what democracy is, and much less than that will fight for it. so yer screwed.
the situation is not entirely hopeless, other nations have pulled out worse conditions, prc comes to mind, but usa hasn't got a mao ci dong. and marxism is a bit obsolete, anyway. so what to:
if you have a modern profession, emigrate. but you probably are doing fine where you are. maybe worried about the kids?
if you don't? immigrate. find a scrap of land and raise chickens and vege. go on the barter economy, and learn to shoot, with bow and sling shot.
can't leave the city? deal drugs.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
if you mean oligarchy of the rich, it began with g. washington. none of those men committed treason, for they were absolved of all crimes when they were not prosecuted, and nixon merely lost his job.
there is a case for tyranny in trump's career, for he came to power against the elite by harnessing the anger of the dispossessed. but this is almost admirable. hillary would have had another war on america's charge sheet, like so many who haven't been shot at, she is a fierce warrior.
why will you not discuss the obvious? america is an oligarchy because the founding document established rule by a few. america is corrupt because every elite is corrupt, it is the human response to power without oversight.
democracy is possible, many states have it, and real democracy makes corruption difficult. but no one suggests getting democracy, oligarchy is sacred scripture in your benighted land.
raise your discussion above personalities, consider principles. if you must use 'democracy' in your discussion, why not first talk about getting it?
1
-
1
-
1
-
nuclear weapons are a very good thing, if your nation has a delivery system and sufficient warheads to discourage any sane nation, however large.
the current prosperity of china would be directing profits to wall street, if they were not nuclear armed.
india's continuing backwardness would make it an easy target for bullying, as the british did, but now it is secure from that danger.
even north korea is safe, although it's possible prc just doesn't want it, and cia can see no conceivable profit for usa.
ukraine, now, is much more attractive to usa, first they dispatch the military arm of european branch of empire, nato, and soon ukraine will be theirs. all that wheat, at fire-sale prices!
ooops! putin disagrees.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
mao was not an unmixed blessing, but he understood the value of education and health care. and the rule of the communist party ensured that all were putting their shoulder to the national wheel.
so he frightened the capitalists, who squashed china's development very effectively. deng xiaoping found a way around that, and the result is the wonder of the world, and more to come, almost daily.
india could not be more different, there is a reason they lag china by a country mile. many reasons, no doubt.
they will improve, but a nation that takes religion seriously, and uses it to classify people at birth, is carrying a severe handicap.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
actually, it was originally ' m'aidee' ' which is 'help me!' in french. approximately. but those ignorant anglo-saxons needed something easier to spell.
moving on to the important question, india contending for the prize of 'least effective response to the virus.' of course india would be hopeless. a poor nation, over-populated for its area, few medical resources, and directed by the usual gang of political parasites.
and yet, 100 years ago, india and china were very similar.
i cannot resist saying, a little bit of communism seems to have set china on a more constructive path. but, there is more to it. perhaps india is not a natural nation state, and should be dissolved?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
usans rattle on about democracy, as if they have it. they don't. they should know they don't. some states have 'democracy,' if independent. so why do they claim a status, citizen, when they know they don't have it. they are merely civilians. ignorance and wishful thinking, among dimwits. more cynical lying malevolence among the richos.
democracy is voting to direct the state. voting to choose your masters is just another form of oligarchy. directing the state makes you a citizen, choosing a master makes you a chump.
jan 6 ? a trivial event, but embarrassing - a make-believe coup by a rich jerk enacted by dimwits, never any threat to the nation.
except for the embarrassment, of course. so hard to pass yourself off as 'leader of the free world' when one of those 'leaders' couldn't organize a children's birthday party.
usa presidents are seldom obviously intelligent, but trump was the only one in my lifetime to be visibly dim. he was no threat to anything, except the facade of competence at the top of the evil empire.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
don't blame those in power- they are looking after themselves in the usual fashion. if there is blame, blame those who yell shame! and then turn to other news. there is no democracy in the federal government of the usa, or citizen initiative would have made it a different nation long ago. consequently, if your are sick of the greed and incompetence in the management of the nation, you must create a power of citizen initiative through organization leading to revolution. the transfer of power from congress to electorate is revolution, but if you get great numbers in public support, perhaps the politicians will go quietly, head on shoulders.
make no mistake, as long as the rulersdo not fear you, they will not submit. as long as you fear to act, they will not change.
now go back to whining, the do-ers, if any, are too few in a nation of slaves.
"Those who do not move, do not notice their chains." rosa luxemburgh, poor lady- she stood up, in a nation of slaves.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
the government of the usa was modeled on that of georgian britain, as closely as possible. madison thought that government was the best that humanity could devise. but he also thought that the rich should rule the usa, as the aristocracy ruled britain, so perhaps his goals and methods might not be publicly acceptable nowadays. but the rich rule still, in practice, and in private they presumably think king george 4 got it right.
mattis can tell a sinking ship as well as anyone, no credit to him in leaving it. trump's fast-draw resolution of the syrian morass was out of step with the 'deep-state' government, who never saw a war they didn't want to visibly win, and seldom one they didn't want to be in. partly of course, because they were not actually in it. but the important point here, is that serious questions are being decided by one individual, hopelessly incompetent, of contemptible character and no experience.
when will americans start to ask, 'maybe we need a new constitution?' because trump is there lawfully, and is obeyed as he should be. there has to be something wrong with the law, don't you agree? 'the law' is the constitution.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
if you participate in celebrity politics, why are you complaining that others do too,. this site is unconcerned with issues of immediate consequence to the nation, you are immersed in the national culture, 'who will be our master, and will they be kind.?' no one talks about issues of consequence, simply because the american people are not citizens of a democracy, they are only consumers of gossip about their 'betters.'
on a less depressing note, the rise of bloomberg has rubbed the national nose in the distinction between democracy and plutocracy, and perhaps a few young people will realize their oldies have been lying to them. perhaps eventually this understaanding will lead to the west coast and northeast seceding, leaving bubbaland to become independent farmers brewing their own whisky and telling lies about fish they nearly caught in the local crick.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
when it is clear that, ukraine is going to 'lose,' their government should ask for conditions of peace.
if ukraine does not get massive support, munitions and soldiers, they are going to lose.
usg will smile at them, and say, 'fight on, for liberty!' and give them guns, and verbal support. this is a war between usa and russia, and usa can not lose, not a single soldier, only money, and that is printed daily, in endless supply.
so, don't tell ukraine to give in, that is their right. but don't tell them to fight, either, because neither usa nor india is going to risk war with prc.
'openings' for india? are you some rat looking for a meal on a corpse?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
trump is not house-trained. he is perfectly typical of affluent america, but as he was born rich he doesn't have any of the habits of false modesty that most politicians acquire early in their career. we laughed when dubya said a 'c' student could be president, but it's less funny when you are confronted with the reality that a vain, dim bully can do it too, simply by pointing out the flaws in other candidates, real flaws, on the record.
i despise trump, any sane person would, but he has done usa a favor, just by being a mirror to his nation. like him, of course not. but he has been useful, and many 'progressives' have not learned the lesson he has offered. they don't want to learn, because action is required, and they are hoping someone else will do the lifting.
biden is not much improvement, if any. someone will be pulling his strings, just like trump. but if you are too lazy, or too dim, democracy will not come, and usa will not improve.
1
-
the point of no return was the establishment of the constitution. it flash-froze the plutocracy of the day into a formal state that excluded democracy and installed a wealthy elite in power. much has happened since , but by no accident, the wealthy elite still direct the nation. every elite rots, out of simple greed and arrogance, and eventually it cannot command effective defense against exterior forces, since the soldiers either will not fight, or decide to run the nation for themselves.
it took a long time for the roman empire to fall, usa will be quicker, as it has used hegemony rather than occupation.
but the climate crisis will likely be the engine of destruction, econonic and social pressures can destroy a nation as easily as bombs. military rule will be termed 'temporary' as response to natural disaster, but continual disaster needs continual military rule.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
in the declining years of usa, there is a certain justice in the appearance of a trump in national politics. a person whose only asset is great inherited wealth, notably stupid, selfish as a spoiled child. he sums up in his bloated body the aspirations of the founding fathers. he is the ideal american, produced by the law and culture made by those slave master/plutocrats who began lying with "we, the people..." and continued to throw the bodies of soldiers into defense of the notion that slavery was not only natural, but productive.
in fact, george washington was the 'father of his nation,' but it is an evil place he sired. and he did it to preserve slavery. it was the source of his wealth, and the other 'great names' of american founding fathers, madison and jefferson were also dependent on the enslavement of africans.
do you wonder where the character of modern usa comes from?
1
-
1
-
trump is fit to be president, the standards are low. truman, reagan and dubya did more damage than trump has, so far- and getting out of syria is probably the right call.
america's problem is not trump. the constitution is obsolete, and the resulting political guild so inbred and self-satisfied that good national management is impossible. this is one of the largest factors in the decline of the american empire. another factor is the invitation of that incompetent american management to 'communist' china, to join the capitalist world trade society. it turns out the chinese are better at capitalism, presumably due to their political system.
trump is not only fit, he is symptomatic of a degenerating capitalist society: predatory, no longer creative, corrupt in business and private life. he is more american than abe lincoln. calling him 'unfit' is mere embarrassment at seeing the american ethos so nakedly displayed. trump will be brought down, and likely replaced by someone who will declare war on iran, and thus prove himself 'fit' to rule the crumbling empire.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
talk all you want, but nothing of substance can be done until you address the fundamental problem of the usa. it is not a democracy.
consequently, the business of state can be hidden from the people, the actions of the state can be against the interest and well-
being of the people. elections are not a safe-guard, they are merely a circuit-breaker, to prevent the crimes of the elite from developing into revolution.
so long as you must put your faith in a 'good king', to save you from an evil elite, you are no citizen, but only a serf.
perhaps the lack of democracy is not the fundamental problem, but rather that the quality of people. being born and raised in an aristocracy generates forelock-tuggers and curtsy-dippers. in any event, tulsi ain't gonna save you. she certainly can't. and if she were queen of the usa, the result would disappoint. no individual is going to save you--- it needs the people standing up, and telling the politicians, "be gone! we will run our nation now."
1
-
'a country run by sociopaths' is accurate, but more often than not it has been the case. trump encapsulates usa today, but there have been equally colorful bandits in the whitehouse before. khomeini called usa 'the great satan,' and without taking the religious connotations seriously, he nonetheless transferred the opinion with accuracy.
america's tragedy is that the criminal government has created an amoral populace, cynical, passive, and utterly unable to break from the course set by madison, of plutocracy 'for the ages.' public intellectuals seem strangely blind to the society around them, commonly referring to usa as a democracy, and poisoning all further discourse. usa is consequently incapable of change, and will decay somewhat in the path of ussr, leaving behind a gangster nation.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
adelstein spends more every year on buying politicians, and he is an 'israeli', by inclination. the real problem is that american politics is driven by money, and that is on purpose: it was madison's intention, explicitly stated, that the rich should rule, and his constitution has delivered the desired result brilliantly.
if you are too dim, too ignorant too fearful of change, then you must continue to live in a plutocracy, because that is what you inherited. by design, there is nothing you can do about it, without revolution. if you accept your fate, i extend my pity.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
stop complaining, serfs. you don't live in a democracy. it doesn't bother those that know it. most think what they have is democracy, only more convenient because done for them, by experts. if you are dim, or ignorant, or lazy, you are exploited by the strong. wolves eat lambs, and rams too, if they get out of their station. that's life.
i've never come across an american 'what shall we do' discussion. perhaps the serious people work in secret. but secret revolution is difficult to imagine.
in any event, if you are not hungry, you don't revolt. even if the elite is driving the nation off a cliff, you don't revolt. and that is why nations and empires end: exterior conditions arise that stress them, and members simply don't care. crash!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
this question is rhetorical, i hope. the people who framed the usa constitution were aiming for stasis. there is a 'presider', a body of old rich white men, and a body of gentry, to carry the claims of the people to the attention of their 'betters.'
the establishment document of the prc is recent, action-oriented and tasked with lifting china into the front rank of nations.
so the chinese have much better leadership now, and this will continue until the new 'mandarinate' of the cpprc is over-taken by age and corruption.
usa will never recover until it gets a new kind of government, and none is in view-- even what passes for intellectual discussion only concerns itself with personalities.
humanity needs democracy, for survival. but it seems to be too hard, just unsuited to the capabilities of homer sap. extinction looms, 'missed it by that much!' will go on the last tombstone.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
capitalism is merely greed, wrapped in arrogance and spray-painted with essence of whore's virtue, to add a bit of seduction to the process of theft.
but that's the way the usa is, and they have the biggest army - maybe we should put our gaze down and obey?
there will be no answers of any value from a tea party of philosophers and economists. typically, some general has a notion of how to run a nation more effectively, and there are plenty of civilians who are willing to run things under god's direction.
democracy is the answer, in my view. i admit that the chance of getting democracy anywhere, soon, is close to nil, so it is an answer to a question never asked. i marvel philosophers do not discuss it. perhaps they are too wise to open a discussion doomed to end in impotence. 'leaders' don't want it, 'followers' don't want it, 'talkers' can do nothing.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
nonsense. trump hasn't started a war, yet. probably won't. has given a chunk of change to the already rich, but that was primarily the work of congress. he has underlined, bold-printed and red-colored the absurdity of the american constitution. that document allows any american over 35 and native born, to be president. and, once again, 'anyone' is laughably misplaced. but not dangerously so- dubya was dangerous, massively destructive, trump merely comical. which is why the commentariat is frothing, they hate the blatant exposure of the primitive ineffectiveness of their government system.
as far as danger goes, compare trump with dubya, trump withdraws from the syrian quagmire, dubya turns the middle east into a seething swamp. and you call trump dangerous?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
if you haven't got the smarts, the courage, the patience, to demand democracy, then the elite will squeeze you. why shouldn't they? yer just cattle to them.
of course, getting off yer knees is unnatural, you were raised that way. that's why you will stay on yer knees, and pray for an angel to enter politics.
sorry, no angels.
but please, stop complaining that those nasty hyenas are eating you, of course they are, it's their nature. and yours, to be eaten. do it quietly, yer cries of pain are disturbing my ears.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
nope. a lula comes and goes, but he is unsupported by his senate, and the same is true of usa.
usa had a brief leftish flowering with fdr, but even mass unemployment and widespread bankruptcies did not lead to fundamental change in the structure of the nation. blame fdr, he refused to install citizen initiative, he was an elitist, only doing what was necessary to prevent real revolution.
so don't get excited about lula, this is superficial activity, brazil will continue to stagger along with no plan and dysfunctional structure, as will usa.
getting democracy, and with it a socialist society, has proved to be too hard for homo sapiens, and perhaps we never will, the doomsday clock is ticking.
but homer is incapable, and his masters unconcerned.
shame really, missed it by that much!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
you may wish public health was more enveloping, more active and better informed. but, everyday, there are about 120,000 more humans on the planet, in spite of the best efforts of trump to reduce them. he's not winning, but there's still way too many bodies on the earth- millions starve, every year. still not enough. 3700 auto deaths every day , drop in the bucket. so cv19 ain't gonna help us, nor is any of the traditional means. china tried 'one child,' and 'two child' is still the goal, but too many backward nations still haven't figured it out. to be fair, quite a few have negative numbers, but it ain't enough.
i'm sorry, we have to cross ebola with the common cold. only way to get back under 1 billion. and that's the only way to keep from boiling the oceans. really sorry, but we have to hope some mad scientist is taking matters into his own hand.
1
-
nothing a politician says is written in stone. they all lie. they all pretend they know what to do, and further pretend they can do it. if elected, reality re-asserts itself, and the chumps are surprised. that's why political discussion is a nonsense- mere kabuki.
i marvel that anyone wants to participate in the usa political system, unless they see a dollar in it. it should be clear to all by now that the usa political system has led the nation to bankruptcy and moral collapse. you need a new one, but there is no one in public life saying, "we have no clothes!"
they are just saying, "put me in office and i'll wave my wand!"
well--- news flash: the rocks of the planet are filled with the bones of creatures whose bodies became obsolete, the pages of history books will tell a similar story, of great nations reduced to blocks of stone strewn about a desert landscape.
you need a new constitution, and anyone who says, "not necessary, just put me in office, and the wheels will turn again!" is simply lying, or crazy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
if bernie can not sweep the rust belt, who is his constituency? the south east has belonged to republicans since lbj, and the mountain states belong to the right-wing nutters, but on policies and promises, the rest of usa will profit from a bernie presidency, except- why?
many think biden can beat trump. bernie not. blame the media.
many think bernie's promises are empty, as they should. presidents don't legislate, and very possible house and senate will hate him.
but worst of all, 'come-back' is admission of defeat. bernie and his children's crusade thought they would sweep the field on tuesday, and they needed too, the dnc would only nominate bernie if every one loved him, and they plainly don't. over-promising is counter-productive, whenever you don't deliver.
americans have to grow up. the constitution is largely responsible for the continuing domination of wealth in usa. it has to be changed, one way or another.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
yer getting an insight into china, from usa military? [insert laughter here ]
lift yer eyes, add other sources, and think a bit, and you will get an insight into usa military thinking.
this is even more valuable, since usa is determined to rule the world, unless vlad can create an obstruction for some useful period. while there have been bloody noses, notably vietnam, and barren adventures in afghanistan and somalia, iraq did seem to pay off with some cheap oil. but usa military is relentless.
unlike the usg, prc is ruled by people who seem to be sane, and competent. they may well be treating the india border as a test field, but there are no grand strategic plans afoot there. it's convenient and safe, due to the woeful state of indian governance and popular education.
over the last 100 years, india and china have diverged radically, and it's not enough to blame britain. you didn't have japan to contend with. so, why? something intrinsically wrong in india. perhaps if you asked xi jinping politely for advice?
1
-
1
-
1
-
guns are just a tool, but it's so much easier to say, "baaad gun!" than to wonder why so many usans want to kill people.
but that subject is never examined, presumably in the 'too hard' basket.
to be fair, it is too hard. there is no tool to change usa culture, because it is not a democracy. so, no citizen initiative.
some people beg their masters, in political power, to disarm the criminals and nutters, so that slavery is more comfortable. but there is money in the gun trade, so this begging doesn't get much result.
besides, a nation of sociopaths provides the cheap soldiers of vigorous capitalism that is the usa version of empire.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@johnriverdavis3497 the principle of democracy is that public activity goes on in public, and is directed by the citizens through referendum and initiative. there is literally no 'government,' only public clerks working openly and without power until directed by the citizens.
currently that is only happening in the confederation of helvetia, among nation states, and not an ideal democracy even there.
the swiss were notably independent during ww2, shooting in both directions, as required. but i suspect the embrace of the eu may have more effect than the nazis, the swiss have had to bend a bit more than their grandfathers did.
the swiss evolved into democracy, and retained politicians. so not a perfect demonstration of democracy. we only have homo sap to work with.
the important point in the beginning of any discussion of political systems, is that electing politicians to rule you is not democracy, not even close.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
there is apparently a living to be made from this gossip, and as i tour around the various sites, it is mildly amusing to see people mixing personal opinion and national myth. they get more of my time lately, as the local library has been closed due to 'the virus.' forget about bc and ad, it's bv and wv from here on.
there will be temperature detectors at every doorway, and an alarm on entry, similar to the alarm if you leave the library without registering books. but this alarm will have a cop with a breathalyzer. and into the drunk box on the pick-up you go.
and biden?
trivial matter. dubya was sane, and could finish simple sentences. and he invaded iraq on a lie, in pursuit of dominance over the oil fields. that was important. but if you make a living by talking, you gotta talk, and sometimes the issue is not war and peace. sometimes it's plague. or even bidem. you could do something with trump's hair 'style' and his weight. both perfect pointers to a man obsessed with vanity and self-gratification. call in a psychologist, with luck he might report markers for sadism and bill-skipping..
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
the real 'progressive movement' died in the early 1900's. they accomplished quite a bit- most important, in my view, is to establish democracy in several states. most visibly, california, which has referendum, initiative, and recall, and uses them as a demonstration of what democracy is.
since then, 'progressives' have quit trying for democracy, and settle for tribalism- 'if he's our guy he's good.' elections are not democracy, btw, they are just gang politics, with ballots replacing bullets.
one consequence of gang politics, is that no one pays much attention to public activity such as law, policy and plans, because ordinary people can not vote for such things. instead, 'politics' is personal, 'vote for me, because i'm a [good guy, progressive, family man, or your conduit into the treasury, or all of the preceding.] which makes american politics notably juvenile.
madison was explicit that his constitution did not establish a democracy, which he feared, as it would lead to socialism. that is why there is no citizen initiative in the constitution. ordinary americans are locked out of political power, unless they are ennobled by election. at which point, they behave like politicians, do you like the result?
1
-
1
-
the usa is an elective aristocracy. in practice, it is also a functional plutocracy. this is not an accident, the constitution was written to achieve this state.
why is the word 'democracy' heard? because it is cheaper to rule with myths, than with bullets.
since control of state activity is beyond the reach of ordinary people, their economic position sinks to whatever level suits their rulers.
prof. wolff never talks about the reality of power, for it might disturb his pension plan. revolution commonly does.
revolution needs planning, organization and sustained courage. so far, no such activity has made a public appearance in usa. perhaps someone beavering away in secret meetings. but probably not.
most societies decay and die, from the infirmities inherent in their early history. usa will be one such.
in the meantime, cassandras such as wolff and hedges piece out their pensions with observation and description of the decay process. the only benefit i can see is that some will be inspired to move self and family as far as possible from the looming collapse..
the comments here are generally in agreement, but has there ever been a birth of revolution? one symptom of a terminal society is a general and well-founded belief that nothing can be done.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
700$ jacket is relevant. it classifies sanders as a politician, not a saint, and not a revolutionary. this is a handy distinction, because a politician is not going to fix america. the framework of america, the constitution, has shaped the nation, and the shape will not change until the constitution changes. that is the work of a revolutionary. 'progressives' wish for a fairy god-mother, who will take care of them. sanders plays to that wish, and made a good living from it. but while he was making his living, america re-entered the 'gilded age,' its natural state. he is not the answer.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
unfortunately, the winner-take-all voting scheme of usa states means that small left parties make life easier for big right parties. the dems started as a party for the people, but it doesn't pay. what pays in the electoral environment of the usa is to be just like the right wing party, so you will get support from big money, and add a few trivial features, of a social nature. that's why the democratic party, and the usa, is what it is.
if you want change, you must change the system, not good enough to twiddle with features.
if you, haven't got the combination of courage, smarts and persistence to organize a revolution, better to run for office, like aoc. she won't accomplish much, but it's a living. and she can look forward to a long career as she more and more resembles pelosi.
1
-
did you know, that 'democracy' used to mean 'rule by the people? how did it change? see george orwell's idea of 'double think.' if you pollute the brains of children, you can stop effective resistance to control for lack of vocabulary.
you don't live in a democracy, but 'democratic' is constantly used as a 'good' word, excusing violence abroad and exploitation at home.
democracy will result in a certain amount of socialism, but socialism without democracy is likely to result in stalinism. so get democracy first, and let the citizens decide how they want to live.
so why does bernie want socialism first? indeed, no mention of getting democracy at all. you'll have to ask him, but my guess is he thinks americans are too dim for democracy, but hungry enough to want state support. he may be right, or he simply wants to be 'boss.' a common failing in politicians, since they are literally nothing without power.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
couldn't resist the hook. it is widely known that lefty women are hot! hot! hot!
well, they were back in the 60's when it was a matter of personal concern.
but why did they vote for biden? he wasn't trump.
why did they vote for trump? because he wasn't a politician.
usa is a primitive place, and remarkably ignorant- they tell each other they are a leading democracy, a nonsense.
a vote for biden is a vote for biden. not a vote for some action, plan or law. it is probably going to strengthen the rule of the rich, even if he throws a few coins to the poor. it is likely to lead to invasion of some nation like venezuela or iran, in search of wealth through banditry.
democracy is rule by the citizens, through referendum, initiative and recall. you haven't got it, you never had it, and you are too ignorant to realize you are chumps. you put up with politician rule when it is visibly crushing you.
the quote from rosa l. is history, and usa chose barbarism.
1
-
1
-
1
-
this is a non-story, about people who think they can bring order and ethics to a whorehouse by applying for a management position.
yang doesn't have much to offer in politics, he's on the wrong side of some ethical questions, but he did inject some reality into usa society with ubi. even rome had to feed the mob from quasi-public coffers. this will come to usa, cv19 just speeded up the process.
biden is a disaster, trump may well beat him, and you can't be certain that's the worst result. the class of politicians nowadays is not worse than before, but they are much less careful about masking their character from the chumps.
the usa political system is obsolete, unjust, undemocratic and rotten. worse, it has created an electorate of disaffected, alienated and cynical people, incapable of driving any significant reform. yer toast, sliding down the ladder of relevance, and gossiping about personalities like a teenage clique.
on the plus side, real decay is much more interesting, more educational than following activity in bern, which is an actual democracy, in a squeaky clean nation.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
funny how people think their own opinion is as good as anyone's. but there is a reason for it: no one else is looking out for you, so on the subject of survival, your opinion matters as much as any giant brain.
britain is not a democracy, and brits are not educated to think like citizens. so when they are presented with an opportunity to express their needs for change, they seize it, however uncomfortable the fit. someone wanted a blue passport, wasn't given a blue passport plebiscite, so voted for brexit.
dawkins is a contemptible man, less intelligent than he imagines, selfish and vain. listen to him carefully, and make your own estimation of his value. not high, in my view.
1
-
1
-
1
-
no, they can't. and if usa was a democracy, it would be a socialist nation.
that is why madison wrote a constitution modeled on the britain of george III. he was explicit about it: democracy would lead to the taxes of the rich being spent on the needs of the poor, and he intended to prevent that from happening. look around- he was very successful, don't you think?
the federal government of the usa is no kind of democracy, and its people are not citizens. they are civilians, divorced from the management of their society.
to put it simply enough that even americans might understand, a nation not run by the people will never be run for the people.
andrew yang will not change things, for he dare not say, "we need a revolution, a transfer of power from politicians to the electorate." maybe he is not smart enough to understand this, certainly he is smart enough not to say it. electing him would certainly be interesting, but ultimately futile, the system is proof against any man not supported by the military. mr, 'yes we can!' should have tipped you off about this. [what was his name, again?]
but andy won't be president. some hack politician will be. that's all you deserve. a nation of cattle will be run by dogs for the benefit of the current plutocrats.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
folks, the reality is, capitalism is just a label for the notion that government should not interfere with rich people getting richer.
it is not a political system, it is a psycho-social disease found in every political system. it's not important, simply because the gun can always over-rule the gold bar.
the american political system is run by politicians. they tend to be responsive to rich persons, but they can say no at any time. the system is not capitalism, it is elective oligarchy.
however, the responsiveness to wealth can be toxic. in the 1920's it was even worse, and arguably threatened the survival of the nation. worse, it stimulated little flowers of quasi-democratic socialist legislation. but this was damped down with band-aid socialism, re-enforced with military spending.
you can't fix capitalism. it is built-in to human behavior spectrum.
but you can create a political system that controls greed. it's called democracy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
if you had democracy, you could improve usa in many ways. but you don't, so you won't. the usa was created to be an informal plutocracy, administered by an elective aristocracy, and madison told you exactly that. had to, to get the grandees of post-revolutionary usa to agree to enact the constitution. does no one get history in school, anymore?
democracy is rule by the citizens, not by politicians. when you claim democracy, you reveal ignorance or mendacity. and you pollute the language in a way described by orwell as 'newspeak' and 'double-think,' when he was attacking ussr. poor man, britain and usa are equally culpable.
1
-
1
-
1
-
india is balancing between usa and prc, and would be usa client if it was not evident that prc might, just, be the winner. seems unlikely, usa has that grossly over-grown military. but sometimes usa loses, to weaker nations, and it turns out that military strength is not the inevitable arbiter.
and usa has laughable management., visible clown car. prc has plans and patience.
if i were running india, i would give some thought to joining with prc in resisting the evil empire. by itself it would mute the usg aggression, the world would be a safer place.
prc has shown it can lift its own people, and nation to the front rank of nations. it might do the same for india.
but of course, this will never happen. indian politicians would fear for their power, and prc might not think indian politicians were friends worth having. they certainly haven't done much for india.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
mm is implying that wealthy people are driving homer sap into extinction? surely not!
i'm pretty sure homer had better get democracy pronto, and socialism soon after, or greed will demonstrate the universal principle that if you eat everything, you die of hunger.
there are probably too many of us on the planet already, but that problem will cure itself in the traditional ways. long term racial survival can only come from government of the people by the people, every kind of elite group has demonstrated incompetence, if the health of the ecosphere is a goal.
the ascendancy of a trump highlights the hopeless obsolescence of the usa political system, it is in terminal decline. the best we can hope for is that the evil empire, yes, that's you, yankee, recedes gently into the history books without destroying the planet.
mm, and many others, has suggested strongly that the soft landing is very unlikely. he has done us a service-- thank you, sir.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
a bit of b. s.from enjeti.
china notified the w.h.o. in a timely fashion. reported the first death, jan 2. second death a week later.
"
On 20-21 January 2020, a World Health Organization (WHO)
delegation conducted a field visit to Wuhan to learn about the response
to 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCOV). The mission was part of the
on-going close collaboration between WHO and Chinese national,
provincial, and Wuhan health authorities in responding to 2019-nCoV.
The delegation visited the Wuhan Tianhe Airport, Zhongnan hospital,
Hubei provincial CDC, including the BSL3 laboratory in China’s Center
for Disease Control (CDC). The delegation observed and discussed active
surveillance processes, temperature screening at the airport, laboratory
facilities, infection prevention and control measures at the hospital
and its associated fever clinics, and the deployment of the rRT-PCR test
kit to detect the virus. "
and a lot more. w.h.o. was on this from earliest out break, in response to chinese notification. claims to the contrary from usa government is simply lying to cover their gross mismanagement. any epidemiologist will say that 1 or 2 deaths a week may not be significant, but needs close attention. there was no close attention from many western nations and they have suffered from it. singapore and taiwan did pay attention, rolled out testing procedures and materials, and fared much better.
china was not at fault here, and anyone saying so is ignorant and presumably biased.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
economists have a built-in sense of inferiority. they would like to design a society from their economic principles, but no one ever lets them do it.
the bullies in politics always make the decisions. almost invariably, the decision they make enriches self and supporters.
and that is the way things are, complaining is fruitless. you want a better society? get power. it can be collective power, but it precedes economic design.
classical athens showed how to get democracy, and socialism, in that order. but it's hard to emulate them, conditions now seldom resemble conditions then and there. but a few principles can be extracted:
athens depended on its navy, so the rowers of their warships were the largest single group of the society, with a natural and encompassing collective viewpoint. when they went on strike, the nation stopped. this real power compelled the creation of formal power, the gradual creation of genuine democracy.
so, if you want socialism, first recognize a large, preferably majority, segment of society, and bring them to see the utility of democracy. then you can enact socialism with the support of most of the electorate. this is the only way to get 'legitimate' socialism.
prouhon failed, marx can be said to have succeeded, with china, except, the success involved dictatorship, and a surprising regression to private wealth with consequent poverty. it is success, but unlikely to last long.
switzerland stumbled into a quasi-democracy, which is both stable and prosperous. there may be a lesson, there.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
you don't have rights and freedoms, because you don't live in a democracy. in a democracy, the people rule, that's what the word means, in greek. it's a phrase: 'citizen-rule.' usa is an elective aristocracy, a functional plutocracy, nothing like a democracy.
in a democracy, when the ghost of aristotle asks: "who decides? the citizens answer: 'we do."
you don't decide anything, except which politician/weasel rules you. that makes you a 2nd class human, the weasel, 1st class.
tulsi can't save you at best, she doesn't want to save you. she wants to be your mother-weasel. salvation doesn't come from politicians, it might be better achieved by making them extinct, and you being part of the nation that 'decides,'
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
there really is no such thing as a right to free speech. but in a democracy, the citizens will demand the right to hear information. they have that right, held from power, because they are the masters of their society. the right is not held by any other kind of society, however much you may hear the word. many societies have a privilege of free speech, it ends when the government decides to end it. no individual can have rights, for lack of power, unless they are members of the ruling group.
assange has done a favor to the people of the usa, and most repay him by supporting their government in its plan to punish him severely, to discourage imitators. don't do any more favors, for that nation, it is dangerous, and nearly useless. really, the whole world should sanction the usa, but unfortunately, most are ruled by elites equally evil.
1
-
1
-
1
-
the good thing about bloomberg is that he rubs the collective nose of the 'left' wing of the electorate in the reality of the non-democracy they live in. they like to pretend usa is some version of democracy, because that allows them to talk like citizens, when they are not. people with big money are citizens, of a plutocracy, most are just civilians, scratching their doggy heads are wondering why their 'democratic' nation is so unequal.
of course, most americans are content to live in a plutocracy, so long as they don't lose employment, or get sick. national management they leave to the real people.
you can't do anything with a nation of lumpen-couch-potatoes, you have to wait until hunger is nation-wide, and some general decides the time for politician rule is over.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
why complain, if you will not act?
write a transition constitution:
" we, the people of the usa, are masters of our nation and exercise our command by citizen initiative.
the public service will administer the nation through referendum, and their activity will be in immediate public record.
signed, jack/jill usan, of 1776 maple st, ourtown, kansas."
when you get 100 million signed up, the politicians will be very accommodating. if they are not accommodating, read to them the explanation for the 2nd amendment.
if they obstruct you still, people who wish to be free must be prepared to fight.
i'm sorry, folks-- talking ain't gonna do it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
yes, usa school children are told daily that they have 'democracy.' it's a lie.
no one has democracy, except the swiss. they stumbled into it, almost accidental, over a long and convoluted process, and the result ain't pretty. but:
when the nazis invited them to submit to a direction team from germany, the swiss said, "wait a bit, we'll get back to you,"
then they had a referendum. big no! and they made it stick, with a combination of resolute militancy and a bit of help from the red army.
don't know how well their democracy is holding up, they are surrounded by an empire run by germany, again.
humanity is not well-suited to democracy. it will lead to disaster, since elite rule is always selfish, and the natural wealth of the planet can not satisfy them.
china today is the most effective society, and will supplant usa if there is no general war.
a barren victory, climate collapse is going to stir humanity worse than the black death.
1
-
anarcho-syndicalism has been around for more than 100 years and made no visible impression on society.
if the notion of 'state' is anathema, it's really hard to compete with societies that have a power structure. just about any structure is stronger than none at all.
aristotle had a lot to say about politics, but the most important aspect, he suggested, is the answer to the question, "who decides?"
power decides. not wishes, not ideas, but the will of power.
from which we can extract the principle:
if you want a society that rewards the common person, they must hold the power.
aka, democracy.
not monarchy, nor dictatorship, not oligarchy, nor aristocracy. all tried, all good for a few, but not for most.
and certainly not 'democracy done for you, by politicians.' that has been given extensive trial, and simply is not democracy, it is just another form of oligarchy, plus a verbal mask. it's a lie.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
because a large majority of usans are dim, selfish and brutal. of that group, half support republicans, half democrats. civilized usans, 10-20%, vote green, or not at all.
the 'not at all' group is commonly 40%, because neither party is anything but a gang, a device to extract money and power from taxes.
i don't know why civilized people don't actively struggle for democracy, maybe they think it's hopeless, maybe they are too civilized. but result same, usa locked in primitive politics of greed and arrogance, and the result is poor national management.
you have to wonder how it is that usans commonly think they have democracy, can it simply be the triumph of newspeak and doublethink?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
the chinese government performed political and economic judo on the usa. first, said we want to join world trade, may we? "only if you let us make things there very cheaply. " not a problem, says china. but you must show us how they work, or we can't make them. "not a problem says usa government."
result, china in best shape since ming dynasty, usa in the toilet.
this is not really class warfare, since usa doesn't have classes. just people, and disposable labor units. china doesn't have classes either. if you are in the party, or not, you may be rich or poor. and the poor can get rich, if they are smart. the rich can get poor, too, but it's harder.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
aristotle wrote a book on politics, and there is a key element that is vital to education still: he said the fundamental question to ask in the management of a state, is "who decides." a democracy is a state in which the citizens 'decide.' the usa is not a democracy. americans should never imagine they are, for they do not decide, they don't even have access to what the 'deciders' are doing. aristotle would characterize the usa as a 'plutocracy,' they had them in classical hellas, it was a sophisticated time.
so when mr. hartmann asks, "should trump have the power to take us to war?" he is indulging in a rhetorical question. it doesn't matter what you answer, or what you think. the usa is not a democracy, neither you nor mr. hartmann are citizens, you are civilians who watch their masters, but do not direct events.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
turned out aoc is a politician. amazing! it's your fault. you don't need politicians, they are just parasites, political pimps.
just get democracy, and decide things by referendum and initiative. but, how to get? mass demos, for a start. but that is only consensus building. at some point you will have offer a choice of peaceful retirement, or the noose. not up to it? then stop whining, if you won't fight, you must be a slave to those who will. politicians are notably health conscious, but they have police and soldiers who shoot for a living.. fortunately, both can decide to work for the people.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
it's really simple: all federal power is held by 535 congress-creatures, and one president-thing. result, money is concentrated too. are you surprised? you shouldn't be, madison said his constitution was designed to accomplish exactly that goal, and it worked.
democracy would be the answer, except a nation of slave-minds can not conceive of being citizen-quality people. they are content to be civilians, and complain about their masters. there will be a ubi, or endemic banditry. the rich will travel in convoys of armored cars for short trips, helicopters are too dangerous, and live in walled communities, if they find it inconvenient to work from their own tropic isle.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
when 'parties' have no principle beyond getting power for politicians, they get in bed with any who help get that power. no mystery there.
and no hope. india was as poor as china in early 1900's, and as powerless. look at them now!
china was as diverse as india, india had the brits, china had the japanese.
so why has china prospered, and india, well, not so much.
for a guess, the japanese concentrated the minds of china, and marx gave a national framework, while india still sanctifies cows. certainly the squabbling of indian politicians offers no clear path toward modern society for all the nation.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
pr. wolff continues to ignore the fundamental question of human society. 'who has power to decide?' he has to. his field is economics, not politics.
throughout history, whatever small group has that power to decide, will use it to look after themselves very well, and family and friends also.
prc is a fresh society, they have only bloomed over the last 30 years, so structural corruption has been somewhat controlled. but the possibility is built in, and it will flourish. in the meantime, their advance has been the wonder of the age, and their increasing global presence is a very welcome counter-balance to the evil empire. [ aka usa, for late-comers ]
i presume their society will rot, like every other elite rule, and i'm sure that 'connections' get things done in china that the central committee of the party deplore, unless they are doing it themselves. no matter.
homer sap had better find a way to stop the usa before it burns down the planet, and prc looks like our champion, with an asterisk.
1
-
1
-
bernie is far better than the rest, but the rest are trash, or in tg's case, 'good in 'parts.' that doesn't matter. what matters is the structure of the state, the character of the people, and the 'born to rule' aristocracy of wealth. no one person can change things. this is the work of james madison. he abstracted the nature of the british state and transplanted it in america. it has endured ever since, with wealth in command. he said his aim was the rule of wealth, that is how he got the assent of state legislators [the people were never consulted, except in rhode island, where they wisely refused the constitution].
i am occasionally reminded of the science fiction novels of isaac asimov, who enjoyed popular success with his novels of 'future history' and robotics. i read them, pretty much all, many years ago, because they were chock full of ideas, even if the prose was uninspired. he realized that individuals could not make 'right decisions' until conditions made them right decisions.
bernie can't fix things, too much is not ready to change. you need a revolution, but conditions are not right. by the time they are, some general will demonstrate that conditions are right for a coup.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
this will come as a shock, to many: politicians lie. have to. they find themselves in a social category once held by force, war lords, aristocrats, with immediate threat of dispensing violence. so they lie. it works pretty well, so long as the chumps are not driven to throwing stones.
democracy is possible, modern education and communication make it easy and effective. but it needs citizen quality people, and there is nearly none. homer sap is naturally dim and ignorant, and the slightly less dim and ignorant can pretend to positions that really should be consigned to history books.
and that's why the mightiest empire of all is somewhat fragile. no real enemies, but high and low are filled with 2nd rate people, living off the credit and reputation of earlier days.
1
-
it's much simpler than you think: madison concentrated power in congress, senate and supreme court to make sure democracy didn't happen. democracy leads to socialism, he was rich, and wasn't having it. concentrated power can be bought, and it visibly is, the result is plutocracy.
usa has none of the functions of democracy: no referendum, no initiative, no recall, nor any right to even know what your masters are doing. it is simple- get democracy or watch the nation decline into a banana republic. simple, but impossible. you are not citizen quality people. you will continue to submit to politicians, by assuring one another that it just needs voting for the right person. but there are no 'right persons.' if there were, you wouldn't see this train wreck of history before you.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
i believe pr wolff is wrong about the number of slaves in athens. most households didn't have one. so they couldn't be a majority. the silver mines were worked by slaves, generally war prisoners ended up there. but hundreds rather than thousands.
but citizens were a minority: men only, born to an athenian woman. the 'hoipolloi' was a catch-all phrase for non-citizen residents, of which there were many. they were free, but did not fight, or participate in politics.
the athenians, like the swiss, were clear about politics: it was about power, born from a spear, or rifle. to be a citizen required readiness to fight for city, or nation.
which is why the swiss don't have an army, they are the army. or so it was until recently. being surrounded by the eu is corrupting them
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
blather. trump is very much president, and he owes no respect to mr reich. it's true that trump is doing little that mr reich approves of, but mr reich didn't win an election. has he ever won an election? nope. apparently he confuses being educated with being an official.
the problem here is, that the constitution has put into the oval office, a dangerous and contemptible clown. a rational response would be, "we need a different constitution."
i recommend democracy, for several compelling reasons, not least making obsolete, even extinct, creatures such a s trump. fools like reich might be less visible, as well.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
as the roman republic shifted into the imperial mode, augustus changed little in roman daily life. for many years thereafter, the senators would attend the forum and discuss state affairs. the only significant difference was, caesar no longer listened. madison feared that a strong national army would allow some general to seize power, and that is why there was none until ww1 made it necessary, and profitable, and ww2 also saved the nation by going into the munitions business on behalf of the allies.
trump is an unlikely caesar, but usa has been in imperial mode since the korean war, and he inherits a government already debased by assassination at home and abroad, by mass murder for profit, and his personal character matches neatly with the national ethos. don't make fun of trump- he is president, and you are not, and it's not an accident.
1
-
1
-
i get tired of listening to these people. none of them address the fundamental questions of motivation and power. governments are corrupt because they are run by politicians for politicians. the politicians may be responsive to generals, or to plutocrats, or both, but they control education and information to obviate any meaningful popular control.
if you want government 'for the people,' it must be government 'by the people.' without democracy, sustained and peaceful society is impossible, since oligarchs of whatever nature will loot society and the planet for their personal pleasure.
democracy, btw, is rule by the people, through referendum and initiative, in a society where holding secrets from the electorate is a crime. because public activity is public, criminal activity becomes extremely difficult and virtue will prevail, for lack of alternatives.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
i'm hoping to see a t-shirt saying, 'shoot the rich!' everyone knows they are inedible, but bullet-proof? maybe not.
no use talking to them, they got money, lawyers and law.
got to confront them, gun in hand.
what you say is up to those who do, but i hope the demand is democracy. it sounds legitimate, and it is: getting democracy is simply transferring power from rich to citizen.
once you have citizen initiative, you can make whatever society most people want.
won't be perfect, but it will be improvable, without the need for gunfire.
if enough people show up, gun in hand, the army won't fire on the people. but if you don't want democracy, unless 'please' works, then you will be slaves forever.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
suppose you have digested the obvious: madison wrote a constitution that ensured the rule of wealth. it worked, here we are, rich rules, ok. then, the usa footprint on the world is shrinking, so the rich are taking a larger share each year, to maintain their lives. the crunch is here, will continue, will reshape the usa profoundly- the normal result is dictatorship. lenin asked, "what is to be done?" because he saw an historical pivot point, and much resulted from his response to those conditions.
but we don't have a lenin, perhaps things have to get much worse, before some [to be] giant figure points a way out. but i think the human race doesn't have any time to spare. just when homo sap must reshape its activity as a matter of survival, usa is entering a final spasm of economic and military attempts at world dominance.
meanwhile, at home, the celebrity dance contest that usans use in place of functional political management is discussing the moves of a sociopathic comb-over vs, demented dimwit.
what to tell young people- not obvious. there is a case for eat, drink and be merry. but life will be short, and the end painful. there is a case for participation in the dance contest, but that strategy is what got you to this point- short and painful also likely. which leaves resistance. no guarantees there, but at least you are not putting your head on the block. try mass organization to create decisive voting blocs. if that doesn't get democracy in 5 years, go to plan b.
1
-
1
-
there are two important characteristics of usa that suggest the empire will fall soon.
usans are terminally ignorant.'
their government is genuinely evil. [no, that's not an asset.]
but size matters. population is large, military budget large, at least, perhaps not well-spent.
usa could be secure, if the quality of their society was good. but it's not. high poverty, high imprisonment, low social protection, poor education, distorted taxation system.
the ship of state is a rotten old tramp steamer, with a gold-plated bridge deck.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
please do not complain when your guy doesn't get the respect you think due. these debates are in aid of selecting a democratic candidate by the dnc., it is not fair, the dnc likes some candidates more than others. and it's their bat, their ball. ay and tg have no chance of selection, although both might show up in bernie's cabinet. but he's not going to win either. biden, is old, and visibly dim. warren is too narrowly supported, so an empty suit named buttigieg is warming up in the bull-pen, just in case needed.
he came from nowhere with nothing to say, and rolled over tg and ay, if you don't realize the race is rigged, stay away from handicapping horses.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
biden needs a "see, i tried," exercise, but he has nothing to offer. his sponsors and his handlers are determined to continue the dominance of usa in world affairs, by all means.
short of war? interesting question. war would be insane, between the protagonists, but it could happen if usa pressed too hard. perhaps india and philippines could be encouraged to test prc courage. they both have reasons to kick the prc ankle, to buoy up internal power.
there is no good will in the usa government, it is rotten with greed and arrogance, and possibly conscious that usa greed fed the rise to competitive power by prc. that must rankle those few in usa capable of sanity.
prc government is currently much stronger in simple mental competence and national spirit. so long as the bombs don't fly, they will win. i wish that were a given.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
well, it did work, in this sense" obamacare can charitably called 'token.'
the fundamental structure of the usa was designed to allow a few rich people to rule nation 0f 300+ millions. the usa is not a democracy, it is an elective oligarchy, and most of those oligarchs are in debt to the rich. both parties run on money, and the very rich can afford to bribe, rent or own sufficient politicians to bend the operations of state towards making the rich, richer. the recent entry of bloomberg is simply a 'hobbyist, who can afford 100s of millions to indulge his current pastime.
i can not be certain why americans don't want democracy, but my provisional guess is, a nation of idiots.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
the usa is not a democracy, the structure of the state is formulated to insure the rich rule- and it works. politicians are not going to fix things, they are the problem, not the solution. and that includes sanders. but it's worse than that- education in the usa does not produce citizens, only consumers, and parasites. aka politicians. 'progressives' nowadays are just people who hope for a kind master. this obsolete social and political structure is rotting the economy, debasing the people, and driving the usa into decline, with no end in sight. well-deserved: a nation created to preserve slavery and license ethnic cleansing has no credit stored up in heaven, and a foreign policy based on militarism earns no friends, outside the military stockade.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
so russia blew up its multi-billion dollar pipeline, when it could just turn off the tap, and preserve chances of income later? that kind of argument would raise questions of sanity in those making it, except there is no sane argument for russia to do this.
usa, ontoh, has an excellent.reason, bang! -presto! and germany is locked in to usa heating oil. perhaps from saudi at exorbitant prices. but not any more, from russia.
so start with that opinion. if yer sane.
the interesting part, is how germany feels about this. they have been loyal, sung the nato song, and now they are going to be very cold. how can any national politician be comfortable about german policy being made by terrorist bombs? and they are terrorist bombs, even if planted by cia agents.
1
-
1
-
1
-
google is not a public service. if you haven't got democracy, or even know what it is, then you have to endure being screwed by the elite. in the usa, that is the rich. usa is a plutocracy, by design, always has been. if you are unwilling to struggle for democracy, it will not come as a gift.
the catch 22 though, is that when you grow up as a powerless consumer, a watcher of public events rather than a participant, you don't form the character of a citizen. so you will go on complaining, but never dream of revolution.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
in a democracy, the administrators put before the electorate referenda about changes to normal operating procedure, and the citizens decide. the citizens also have a power of initiative, to direct action not put by referendum. there is no need for politicians at all. there are no pure democracies, because human society began as warlord dominated groups, right back to the african savanna, when the 'warlords' were the biggest males, and earned their keep by getting in front of the group when hyenas or lions came by. but over centuries humanity has been drifting towards democracy, for various reasons. perhaps the best reason is that the collective decision of all the adults is likely to be better for the nation as a whole, when compared with the decisions reached by elite groups.
the usa has made less progress than most industrialized economies. it is frozen in place by a constitution hopelessly ineffective in selecting good management.
the current apparent choice, between a dimwitted sociopath and an alzheimer dement should persuade you, by itself. further examples are plentiful.
if you are ready for a new constitution, progress becomes possible. if not, not.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
if more than half of murrakin politicians were like bernie, what a wonderful world it would be. but politicians aren't like that . in the youessofay. madison made sure it isn't like that, and would be well-pleased to see his handiwork largely intact. and still the political class think the constitution is a wonderful document. which it is, for them. the pols and the richos are the political class, and the constitution is the source of their power and wealth.
as for the 'mob,' as madison referred to them, they are taught to genuflect to the word, as it protects them from the necessity of dealing with difficult questions, such as education, health care and peace or war. their smart and saintly representatives take care of all that, sleep easy.
i am tempted to think americans are mortal dim.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
marx attempted to bring systematic analysis to human society, and made many useful observations. but the notion of gradual transformation of society into communism was just wishful thinking. it hasn't happened, and won't, because of the 'natural' character of human individuals: given the chance, individuals want to rule, and collect wealth and pass power and wealth to their children.
this tendency corrupts every kind of society, so far, and ussr and prc retreated from 'communism' rather than continuing to advance to it.
currently prc has a mild form of socialism, a primitive, 'guided' capitalism, under a mandarinate of a communist party that will never release power.
marx rightly saw that democracy was impossible to humanity, of his time, and dreamed that progress was possible without it. it isn't.
aristotle was right: the central fact of any society is: "who decides?" which means, as long as the answer is any minority group, the majority will always be exploited.
prc now is the most efficient society on earth, and their 'guided' capitalism has brought china back to the first rank of nations, and is likely to make it supreme, soon.
it won't last long, because the mandarinate will decay as every other elite rule has. indeed, china's history is a demonstration of the life cycle of elite rule.
only democracy has the medicine for elite decay, and homo sapiens may be incapable of it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
the constitution was written by a sociopath named madison, who had to be clear about the aim of the proposed document, in order to sell it to like-minded grandees of the post-revolutionary nation.
it was written to ensure the rule of wealth, he said so. he pointed out that the people would never have a voice in the management of the nation, that was undesirable as it would lead to the 'opulent' being taxed to support the indigent. it was explicitly a document to legitimate the rule of the rich. look around you, open your eyes - it worked!
and there was a certain amount of weasel words embedding slavery in the economy of the nation, too.
appealing to the 'founders' as a standard of public probity is absurd. the nation was established by men smarter by far than trump, but equally crooked. so smart indeed, that jefferson is widely admired to this day.
inquire into the private life and correspondence of this person, and you will find a hypocrite of breath-taking range and consistency.
usa was literally born to support slavery, plutocracy, and ethnic cleansing.
holding the 'founders' up as public models is insane, they should be introduced to school children as the shame of the nation.
trump is in the same mold, merely different in being notably dumb. defective people show up in every aristocracy, in every demographic. in a monarchy, they can be king.
in the usa, they can be president.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
you have a dangerous buffoon in the wh, but not the first. the political system is hopeless. no one is willing to offer a new constitution, because change is too hard.
there will be more dangerous buffoons. usa shows the results of poor management, and it won't improve. i almost feel sorry for usans, but then you murder somebody, or a dozen, or 50,000, and i figure if you are silent in the face of the vietnam war, and the iraq war, and endless other crimes [chomsky can give you a list] then watching your nation crumble under you is well-deserved.
1
-
usa is falling behind in tech race, blames china for theft. in fact, china spends more in this area and are ahead in 5g development. 'theft' not necessary. in desperation, kidnap mwz, use resulting tensions to discipline usa followers, force them to accept only american phones and equipment, even if inferior. just part of the trade war. canada is the first to be squeezed like this, oz and enzed already in line, uk welded onto usa bum. this will become a cold war of technology, which usa looks to lose. trump has given canada judge an excuse to find this a 'political' arrest, and release meng. i hope he takes it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
'we demand!'
not sure if aristotle gave any thought at all to 'economics, 'but he did offer the opinion that the core of human society was 'who decides? the power of decision sets the framework for all major aspects of society, and talking about change without a gun in your hand tends to be fruitless. economics is politics for the powerless, which is why most nations have a small rich and powerful elite, and large numbers of powerless and poor cattle. the rich buy politicians, the politicians pay soldiers, and that is functional economics.
the economy of most nations is twisted to bring about this situation by the application of force. which is why, after giving marx some thought, mao said, 'power grows out of a barrel of a gun.'
if you want change, be prepared for struggle. not dancing, but shooting.
'we demand?' in reality, she is begging, because her hand is empty.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
they didn't tell you much about marxism, did they? not much about slavery, either. or the expropriation of native lands.
usa history is a children's coloring book, with no naughty bits.
without history, a people are wanderers in a dark desert, and easily led where selfish and arrogant people want them to go.
i wonder, does orwell get much respect in usa? '1984' was pointed at ussr, but they were children compared to the massage of history and ideas given to usans.
but remember this - marxism failed to capture attention and respect, and those few nations that based their rule on his ideas were overwhelmed by capitalist nations, or in the case of china, flourished only when capitalism was allowed to direct activity.*
that's because, in my view, marxism gave no thought to politics. politics is about power, and academics hate power, and avoid it. a brute with a gun rules bright and educated academics.
one of mao's winning insights was encapsulated in one of his typical pithy sayings,
"power grows from the barrel of a gun."
even so, he also knew that starving people don't obey guns.
*deng xiao ping was a brilliant man, and saw the utility of pretending to be bending towards capitalism. his invitation to western nations, chiefly usa, to invest in china was political gung fu of the highest order. he needed the base created by mao, but between them they exposed the primitive capitalist societies as both brutal, and naive.
xi jin ping intends to use their foundation for a reclamation of marxist principles, to create a new chinese socio-political model. too soon to say how successful he will be, brutal and naive has the most guns right now. but if the bombs don't fly, we are entering a new period of history.
1
-
1
-
1
-
you can argue that trump voters are dimmer, less well educated and/or more disconnected from usa economy, they are simply angry, fearful, desperate.
or you can take the big picture and say that usa is fragmenting. a history of glorifying 'self-reliance' resulting in a society of total distrust towards any elite group, including medical professionals.
trump is the only national level political figure who is not a professional politician. so a lot of people don't care at all that he is a contemptible figure, following him is a simple way to express hatred and contempt to the elite. well-merited contempt, the usa elite no longer feel any necessity to hide their disdain for the common chump.
usa was hobbled at birth by its foundation principles. not immediately visible because of the physical bounties of the nation. those principles remain, as the natural resources fade.
selfishness, racism, and greed are corrosive principles, written into the constitution, and the poison is taking effect.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
no doubt about it, trump is a 'not good' guy. so why is he ceo of usa? well, the anointed one of two political gangs gets to be king-for-awhile, after a virtual civil war called 'election.' the other gang lost, even though it was nominally stronger. as ever, numbers don't always count, as napoleon, hannibal and alexander demonstrated on several occasions. americans call this 'american democracy,' and it is american, though not democracy.
remarking on trump's character is easy, wondering about the system that put him in power must be very hard indeed, for no one says a word about it.
but that's another wonderful feature of 'american democracy,' no thinking required, or desired.
1
-
1st step, don't call it 'capitalism.' it's just greed and arrogance, supported by a well-paid mercenary army.
2nd, any number of dictators, kings and over-seers have calculated that working slaves to death is good business, so long as you feed them from 15 to 40, just enough.
3rd, any fool can figure out that only 10% can flourish in any society, if the top decile bleeds off the profits.
finally, the cure is simple: get democracy, at gun-point. use it t build a society livable for all. aka 'socialism.'
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
who decides if a nation shall be capitalist, or socialist? i think that in the usa, one man decided. he wrote a constitution modeled on georgian britain which put the rich in control of the nation, 'for the ages,' in his words. his design worked, and his intentions were clearly expressed as he promoted the constitution to the grandees of the various states, who established the constitution. it was filled with lies, notably in that the word 'slavery' never appeared, while discussion of 'indentured' labor was detailed in supporting slavery. but the first lie in the constitution was "we, the people," for the people were never consulted. except in rhode island, where they had a referendum. they rejected the constitution. after the other 12 states accepted, they gave in.
madison 'considered' democracy in his promotion of the constitution, but rejected it, as it would lead to the taxes of the rich being spent on the purposes of the poor. the constitution will continue to support plutocracy until it is replaced.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
instead of 'left-right,' lets put the conversation around 'who decides.' if all the adults, it's democracy, if one person, it's dictatorship.
suppose their are 300 million voters, and 150 million plus one votes 'yes.' that's democracy
only one 'voter' yes or no, that's dictatorship.
1000 voters, 501 decide, that's oligarchy.
where is usa? 536/2, 269 decide the path of the nation, so it's an oligarchy. the word means rule by a few, and compared to 150 million + 1, it is very few indeed.
why don't you talk about this?
why talk about what you wish would happen, when you are too apathetic to act in getting democracy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
usa started off as an elective aristocracy, dominated by wealth. it was in fact separated from britain to preserve slavery.
from that base, little has changed, so long as you are white. overt slavery gone, but the for profit prisons are heavily filled with brown people.
geography made usa rich, then strong, now the most powerful nation on earth.
but less so than 10 years ago. the rise of china has been spectacular, a demonstration of what can be achieved with good management, and a shame to every other government in the world, for china is not rich in space or resources.
the usa elite is getting nervous, and has recently begun a campaign to smother the prc, all means short of war. it seems unlikely to succeed, for the chinese have demonstrated determination and intelligence, and they are already too strong to be beaten without catastrophic reprisal.
unfortunately, the usa elite is not accustomed to having their wishes not met, so the whole world is in danger.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
so the answer to 'why are we locked in a two party system?' is, that you are locked in a two party system?
the structure of the usa government is built on a constitution whose purpose is stasis. it was written by madison to preserve the rule of wealth, and slavery, and it has succeeded quite well in the first aim. slavery is now a minor feature of society, largely confined to for-profit prisons. the 'stasis' came by locking the direction of the nation away from the people. madison explained that democracy had several bad features, notably the certain outcome of using the taxes paid by the rich to serve the needs of the poor. and he wasn't having it.
the people of the usa are called 'citizens,' but they are not, they are civilians only. watchers, not actors. the usa is frequently called a democracy, but that is simply a lie. it is an elective oligarchy of 535 aristocrats-for-awhile, usually a long while.
why are there only two parties? because the first 70 years of the federation was a struggle between plantation grandees and nascent commerce, which slowly coalesced into parties contending for control of congress. commerce won, it needed a civil war to bring the slavers into line, but the democrat losers still had a base in the south and recovered as the republicans became too crooked to fool the voters. wilson, you should remember, was a southern gentleman, a racist to his core, but to get into office he invited b. t. washington to an informal dinner at his home, and thereby got the support of the southern democratic party, then largely african american. his wife said not one word at dinner, and left the table after a few very difficult bites. humans will do anything for power, and the democratic party is not and never has been obstructed by principles or ethics.
you are ruled by two wings of a mafia gang, alternating periods of access to taxes and patronage. why you put up with it is a matter of continuing bemusement, could it be a 'submission drug' in the water, with fluoridation as a cover?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
no legitimacy? putin is doing on a small scale, what usa does on a grand scale.
but usa does murder for profit, putin is afraid russia will be nibbled to death using salami tactics.
usa/cia took pride in installing a billionaire president in ukraine, since then the rest of ukraine has fallen into poverty. well done, cia, making the world submit to wealth.
i am not surprised usa is 'shocked' at putin's action, but it has nothing to do with affronted morality, you are only surprised that someone would dare to confront the evil empire in arms.
putin has gambled the farm on saying "no mas." to usa. if it goes badly, he'll be dead, one way or another.
but it appears he has won. like north korea, he has put his pistol on the table, and it's a much bigger gun. usa/nato has folded. words will continue to be said, and the nazis of ukraine will go on fighting for awhile, but ukraine has been saved from the dark side, again.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
it depends on whether the health, wealth and spirit of the worker is a factor in the 'efficiency' calculation. private enterprise has usually not worried about such things, and the 'satanic mills' are still around, nowadays just typified by amazon. a great many small enterprises are little better than slavery, and private prisons are slavery.
doesn't matter, nothing you or prof wolff can do. no initiative, no democracy, means impotence, lightly masked by empty talk about 'what should be done,' if only we were citizens of democracy. you are not citizens of democracy, you are powerless chumps.
1
-
1
-
i suppose there's a living to be made, educating the thirsty for knowledge in areas public education neglects. why else would you do it?
so far as i can tell, homer sap needs democracy, and some resulting socialism, if we are to survive. because what we've got, doesn't work.
but, as far as i can tell, homer is incapable of democracy, and socialism without will decay for lack of feed-back.
there are little outbreaks of both, the swiss deserve recognition for a rough democracy, the scandis and one or two others manage a presentable socialism, as long as the righties are kept out of office. but these are mere pimples on the face of homer who rattles between elective oligarchy, and simple tyranny.
because the weak link is the human character, and it appears to be genetic. extinction must be the ultimate result, and not long delayed.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
putin has created a situation wherein usa can make war on his army in ukraine without consequence in usa, aside from printing more money. ukraine is a proxy war, and the only certain losers are ukrainian. their government might wish they had not taken the bribe. their people may wonder 'what were they thinking,,,'
putin can not be enjoying the situation, he may still think it's better than submission to usa encroachment, usa masters are certainly happy, for now.
the situation is stable, for the short term. when putin has carved off part of ukraine and fended off the usa/nato support, peace will descend on the corpse of ukraine.
but usa/nato is remorseless, they may resile briefly, but they will be back. putin must find a way to hurt nato directly. shooting captured foreign soldiers would be a clear signal.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
shouting at trump is useless. he is a person with 90 iq driven by a sociopath father to pretend to be competent, covering his inabilities with empty boasting and simple lies. he gets away with it to some extent because usans are crippled by schools and myths. if his commercial performance were a matter of public record, he would disappear in a gale of laughter, however sour.
but how did such a cartoon cripple get in the oval office, and how did the usa come to have still a system devised in powdered wig times, to ensure the rule of wealth?
it's not trump, or dubya, or ronnie, or truman- it's yer antique political system, and the dysfunctional social and commercial society that flows from it. when will someone ask, "why do we have a king who can not speak above 12 y. o. level, or have any opinion not crafted to hide his ignorance?" are you all dim?
1
-
1
-
americans are seemingly surprised by the behavior of politicians, constantly. but if you are constantly surprised, the fault is yours. politicians are what they are in response to the environment they live in, just like every other living thing. a passive and ignorant populace will be preyed on by various kinds of elite groups, just as hyenas and cheetahs eat wildebeest. hoping that some politician will be better than others is natural to victims, but it is the default survival tactic, what you do when you are too weak to take effective action.
warren/her team has decided she can't win, using current methods so she threw the sabot into the machine. ends her chance [small] of victory, improves her chance of tagging on to a biden government and a successor campaign. that's politics, in the usa.
the management selection process of the usa is hopelessly obsolete. it is the reason the nation is decaying. there is no visible activity to change the system, so you are doomed. sensible response would be voltaire's - "best to cultivate my garden." but if you don't have a garden, and have to make a buck, then talking about warren and usa politics has some potential benefit. for you, not the nation. that's a write-off.
1
-
1
-
1
-
so far as i can tell, european jews invaded palestine, very quietly, under the blind eye of the british 'mandate.' in about 1925, they were strong enough to throw off the pretense of peaceful settlers, and declare their intention of taking all of palestine, "from the river to the sea." which remains their goal, one bite at a time. the locals resisted, but without european money and guns, later american money and guns, they find themselves pressed into 'reservations,' dependent on u. n. aid for survival. a crime done in the open, worse than apartheid.
1
-
1
-
the reason the difference between democratic and republican is slight is the fundamental mechanics of a winner take all voting system. that system extinguishes small parties and forces the two major parties to leave no space between them, lest the other side occupy it.
the american political system is antique. but much worse, it was designed to ensure the rule of wealth. one consequence has been that national management is inferior to many other states, since private interests supersede the national needs. beginning with space, secure borders, and every mineral resource, usa grew to international dominance. but the weak governance has caused it to drift down every ladder of national excellence. even interdicted cuba manages to have a better public health system.
the evidence of a very dysfunctional political system is very clear, yet there is no visible pressure for a constitutional revision.
madison boasted that he had created a plutocracy 'for the ages,' and he was right.
so usa will continue to decay, there will be endless nit-picking on the festering boil du jour, but there is a russia in the usa future, perhaps even an austria. and americans will comfort themselves that china's rise came from underhanded methods. well, not. as madison said, 'the gentleman in his carriage' should rule the mob. but this only works in a horse-drawn society.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
stop calling them conservative. selfish, greedy, arrogant, any or all is appropriate, and de-legitimizes their attempts at rational discussion.
no use talking about m4a, as long as you submit to politician rule. even if they give it to you, they can take it back when it suits them. you need a constitution establishing democracy, and not susceptible to political meddling. saves a lot of money, too- don't have to pay politicians, and bribes have to be paid to the majority of voters, which will stimulate the economy and recycle any money over-accumulated in individual hands.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
lies are weapons, cheaper than bullets, often more effective.
usa is the evil empire. i do not know why usa peeps put up with it, except that as long as they are undisturbed, it's someone else's problem. increasingly 'someone else' decreases.
usa was born to protect wealth, maintain slavery and enable ethnic cleansing. if you are surprised at the modern nation, look at its history.
journalism without democracy is just gossip, or an exercise in self-flagellation. there is no use in telling cattle they are cattle, and the elite already know the people are cattle.
well, there is one use- you can make a living telling people they are cattle, somewhat like those cowboys who kept the cattle quiet at night, by singing to them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
i do get tired of yanks who imply usa is a democracy. it's not, folks. not even close.
assange is lucky to be alive, and can forget about freedom. usa deep state wants him dead, or better in a concrete box, to encourage silence in others.
i realize you can do nothing about the lack of democracy, the nation was built to prevent it, and you would be entitled to pity.
but you swallowed the lie that usa is 'special' and can be a repressive society with an aggressive foreign policy,, that's murder and invasion, and still style itself a defender of human rights.
my god, you have to be stupid to swallow that. or you say you do because you are incapable of changing your nation even though ashamed.
assange is troublesome, and a foreign national, so he can be turned into sausage with no fuss among the cattle. they are too busy trying to find the rent money. and if they cause trouble, no more food subsidy for the kids.
personally, i think julian is an up-himself idiot who bought a miserable life to enjoy a bit of general admiration and a few groupies.
he knew, better than most, the quality of the people he was irritating. he should have been operating in deep secrecy and stayed behind the mask. the groupies did for him.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
does usa now, or ever, have an effective power of citizen initiative? then it's not, never was, a democracy. 'citizens united' demonstrated that the rich rule, it did not establish the plutocracy, merely demonstrated it.
"but we vote, ain't that democracy?" no. they vote in russia, they vote in china, they even vote in north korea - by itself, voting means nothing.
in a democracy, not only do the people vote, the people choose what to vote for. but you only choose which gang of crooks will steal from you, tweedledum, or tweedledumber.
when a biden runs against a trump, your nation was presented with a choice of senile crook or dimwitted crook, which is a precise demonstration of the value of voting, in an elective oligarchy. have you no feeling of shame? not only are you being diddled at regular intervals, they don't even bother to pretend anymore, that elections mean something,
and you just take it....
that's the important thing about democracy, as a citizen you direct the nation, in concert with others. this creates a 'citizenry' of people chock-ful of self-respect and self-confidence.
it was no coincidence that when hitler invited the swiss to give up and save lives, in view of the gross difference in numbers, and being surrounded by axis powers, the swiss held a referendum [democracy in action] and answered: "no." and they made it stick because they paid the cost of democracy, every healthy man was a soldier, and the national sport was field shooting.
democracy makes a higher quality person. which is why usa is following in the same old historical path, commonly summarized as 'down the gurgler.'
1
-
1
-
1
-
a great many more than 30 million do not have an education that fits them for the role of citizen. this is appropriate, as americans are not citizens, merely civilians. watchers of the political process, not agents in it. 'watchers' is rather optimistic, they have so little reward from participation that many don't watch, or even vote.
in modern terms 'couch potatoes. ' pr. wolff is not speaking to them, clearly. they have better things to do, or so they imagine.
usa needs a che guevarra, and prof. wolff is not even john the baptist. i suppose a retired academic finds these fireside talks satisfying, but his only inclination to action seems to be stronger labor unions. a barren idea, as a bit of history would suggest. in any event, read che's book, it's a bit of education in a number of areas, and as much marx as you can handle- there's nuggets in the there, somewhat difficult to find in a lot of words seemingly no longer relevant. and treat yourself to any engels you can find. revolution was just a hobby for him, a rich man's life offered many diversions, but when he wrote it was sharp and useful.
capitalism is neither comic nor tragic. it's just a label for greed, backed by soldiers and police. the rich got a grip on colonial america, and flash-froze it with the passage of the constitution. i can see no path to democracy and socialism, starting from here. if those are your goals, and you maintain hope of moving towards them, good luck.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
if we can get it passed...
unfortunately, even if passed, some at least, it will just be a short-term stop-gap.
usa will remain a plutocracy, until a new constitution is written, and your masters will continue to bleed the nation for their private aggrandisement.
you are reprising the 1930's because no fundamental change was made. ww2 saved usa, not congress.
prc is determined to be numero uno, and there is nothing usa can do short of starting a war. some in the usa are already beating the drums - see 'grk tv' on youtube.
they are warming up the chumps, who will pay, and die, for 'freedom.'
bernie ain't gonna save you, you can only save yourselves. but passive cattle aren't gonna save themselves, and that is the usa peep.
will a nuclear war solve the lack of jobs, education, and health care? do you really want to die so bezos is 'free' to move his corporation off-shore?
1
-
capitalism is not truly an economic system, merely greed systematized.
and democracy is a political system, in which adults born within a nation are 'citizens,' and in concert direct their society through mechanisms called referendum and initiative. you don't live in a democracy, and you are not citizens, but merely civilians. if you refuse to demand citizenship in a democracy, at threat of civil war, don't be surprised if your place in society is unsatisfying. the elite is weak, for they are few, but the people are weaker still, for lack of education and courage.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
there is a constitution, and it limits what a president can do. president sanders might be able to tone down the murderous imperialism by just a little bit, and if speaker aoc controls the house, well, it wouldn't matter much, senate and supremes will block most legislation.
the people who established the constitution were on top of society, that 'we, the people; was a lie, and they wanted stasis. even fdr, with, briefly, total control of congress and real socialists by his side did not take the opportunity to establish democracy. didn't want it, is my guess. there won't be a second chance.
president bernie will talk a lot, and do a little, but the plutocracy will sail on, and undo most of what little he accomplishes. that's why you are in the second gilded age right now, and why the coming change will be military dictatorship. human society has a track record, and usa is following the track.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
and your point is? you live in an elective monarchy, with an elective aristocracy, that can and does operate in secret. if you are surprised that corruption happens, i pity you.
but there is nothing to be done. democracy has the potential to end corruption, simply by requiring public business to be done in public.
but democracy requires citizen quality people. usa is populated by orcs and hobbits. neither suited to democracy, so the hobbits must endure corruption, incompetence and oppression. orcs will deliver it for their masters, enjoying the process of walking on the weak.
if you would just stay home, we could leave you to it. but orcs need to be fed, and they murder all around the world, where they find weakness.
1
-
1
-
no, it's not why you have a government. in the 40' and 50's, usa had an administration. there was a pretense to democracy due to the large number of ex-soldiers looking for work. but when nixon got in, the pretense ended. 'my government' was the phrase he used and he tried to put the wh ss into 'palace guard' uniforms, rather operatic.
if you don't know the difference between democracy and what you got, and yer over 30, then move on, yer wasting your time.
i use 'elective aristocracy' as a label for usa government, but globalization and increasing militarism is making 'elective tyranny; ever more apposite.
democracy is possible, some states have it, but most of the usa is populated with serf class people, they are incapable of thinking like citizens, if you are habituated to the rule of politicians, to the point you can not even imagine participating in democracy, then your only hope for a decent life is the appearance of large numbers of politicians characterized by intelligence, education, experience and public spirit. fingers crossed!, candles lit! but buy a lottery ticket every week, that is more likely to get a good result.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
censorship is always bad, even dim jerks must be allowed to offer facts and opinions for public evaluation.
chomsky suggested rogan's contribution is trivial, and often wrong. he wishes people would talk about more important matters. make your own judgement about the relative value of chomsky and rogan in public discussion, but chomsky is not 'for' censorship, he just wishes people would talk about bigger problems.
chomsky makes mistakes, in my view, but he has been a voice for civilization for longer than most have been alive, and deserves our respect. also, whenever you find yourself in disagreement with him, have strong arguments prepared.
the 'truckers' are not the people. they are a very small segment of the population, many are contractors, not wage-workers. their main point of contention with usa government seems to be that they want the freedom to spread disease, sorry, no, they don't.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
the constitution was written by a slave plantation owner, to justify the independence and freedom necessary to enslave africans. it was an attempt to flash-freeze usa society, since the creator was on top.
there were provisions for change, but necessarily limited. can't have plebs interfering with society.
slavery was locked in, and could only be removed by gunfire.
rule of the wealthy was locked in, and continues today.
it doesn't matter how ineffectual a president may be, because the senate is the master of the nation.
not the people. that's why there is no referendum, no initiative. no democracy.
you are governed by a political elite, and call yourselves 'citizens of a democracy.'
it's simply a lie, endlessly repeated, to stupify the chumps.
and that is why your national leader can be a trump, or a biden. you aren't smart enough to demand better.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
define 'horrendous actions.' usa killed upwards of 100,000 iraqis, for no reason except a group known as 'pnac' directed the nation to war, out of greed and arrogance. of course, that was almost trivial, compared to the actions of the usa in south-east asia, notably vietnam. and a great many muslims are angry about the invasion of palestine by, primarily, european jews. initially supported by uk, later usa, that was a fairly 'horrendous action, don't you think.
1
-
it's worse than that. madison promoted his constitution to the establishment convention as a sure defense against democracy, and, not incidentally, protection of slavery.
and he delivered. the south rightly claimed the protection of the constitution, that the north had profited from for 60 years.
but the north had changed its mind, more money to be made from wage-slavery, so they 'discovered human rights.'
and it's the same old story today. the people that authorized the iraq invasion are simple murderers. but there was all that lovely oil, and prospects of empire in the oil lands around.
likewise, nato has become a tool of empire, the ussr has gone, there is no threat anymore.
then there's the vietnam war. worse, by far. still, there was personal benefit. i realized i was living among monsters., in a nation ruled by sociopathic scum.
1
-
or, you could try democracy. this is a type of political structure in which a large part of the people, called 'citizens,' decide the activities and and laws of the society through referendum and initiative, and the public service carries out these directives.
democracy has been tried in several states, notably california, and seems to work well. and there is the additional incentive, that politician rule has been widely tried, and is characterized by corruption and injustice. worse, in the usa, the result has been militarism as a device for corruption, the transfer of taxes to shareholders in munitions corporations. this is not only theft, it leads to large scale murder, and threat of general war.
1
-
1
-
1
-
yes, in my view, the only important question is political, not economic: to paraphrase aristotle: "who decides?" the usa is not a democracy, it is a purpose-built oligarchy designed to ensure the rule of the rich. no discussion that does not begin with getting democracy is likely to have any effect. people like wolff evade this question, for they have no answer.i believe a sufficiently large citizen action group could lead the usa to democracy. but is there such a group? like, i suspect, professor wolff, i think not. nor even close. humanities weaknesses appear to be fatal.
which means that people like wolff are just carrion birds, gathered around the twitching carcass of humanity in the hope of a meal. no shame it it, even vultures have their place in heaven.
1
-
1
-
usa is approaching it's 'best before' date, but comparisons with rome and britain are not very useful. there are two aspects that makes usa hegemony nearly unique:
rome and britain never had the unmatched dominance enjoyed by the usa. perhaps ultimately more important, is the impact that modern human society has had on the envirorment. usa is one of the top polluters, and simultaneously one of the least willing to acknowledge or act to reduce this threat to survival.
how will it fall? it will run out of gas. military bases consume money, while adding little to human wealth. they only transfer money from taxpayer to munition corporations, while subsidizing enough soldiers to keep control of some elections. already this dysfunctional economy is glaringly visible in the rapid advance of chinese technology and trade. if we are lucky, usa will fade away like britain did. there is obvious scope for military adventurism abroad, and military coups at home. once the nuclear bombs start to fly, we are all dead, so we can reasonably hope it won't come to that. not impossible, of course.
most likely result? general gabbard will lead a division of [very] special forces to capture the government in about 15v years time. the nation will heave a sigh of relief, as the politicians will have sickened everyone by then.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
every now and then, i enjoy mr enjeti. putting the boot in to obama is a worthwhile activity, and should be encouraged. but don't be too unkind- his goal was to be the first black prez, and retire, unshot, and unshot at. his followup career is harmless in the american context, and more respectable than dubya and his paint-by-nunbers pastime.
meanwhile, the american celebrity dance contest rolls on, and bernie is looking possible. i hope he makes it. his time in the oval office is make-or-break for the usa, if it's biden it's rolling disaster. i'm betting on biden, the 'real' people want him. he has 'friends.'
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
usans are used to speaking in the passive voice, for lack of participation in the national power structure.
'should be banned?' by whom? anyone can run, and if 35+ and native born, may win.
he might run, likely, he might win, very unlikely. but a 2 horse race is always a gamble, and biden might collapse into drooling incapacity a week before the election.
at which point, trump will say the contempt of democrat politicians for the welfare of the nation is demonstrated , again. that will be very evident, and might get him over the line, just as it did against clinton.
the usa political system was crap at birth, and hasn't improved much.
but democracy is too hard for you, and getting it made doubly hard by being told endlessly that you have it already, much improved by being in the control of politicians. if you are willing to swallow that myth, the second coming of trump is almost plausible.
usa will suffer many more years than four, for the sins and ills of its history. considering the conditions of birth, there is no fixing of what ails you. but don't blame trump. he's just a symptom of terminal rot.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
there are parallels between rome and usa, and it's worth talking about them. but the fatal flaw in the usa is the lack of citizen initiative. the state was purposely designed to be ruled by the rich, and the levers of power were kept out of the reach of the common people. so too, in rome. in rome the result was aggressive war, as the yeoman farmer was driven off the land by the giant slave estates, and ended up as a city dependent, or a soldier bringing land and slaves into the hands of the upper class.
any number of poor americans have entered the services, to get that vocational education that usa does not provide, and consequently fight the wars of banditry that america has been engaged in since the 50's. and there's nothing you can do about it, because there is no citizen initiative. madison was protecting slavery, and it worked- only civil war was available to change the constitution in this regard. and only revolution will save americans from penury now, and endless mercenary war. quite like rome, although roman farmers didn't have the advantage of historical example.
1
-
i thought there was little or nothing in russiagate, because putin didn't get to be tsar of all the russias by doing business with shady real estate promoters. but trump has never done an honest deal if crookery was possible, so his trump tower activities would probably put him in jail for civil crime, not treason.
no matter, he is still president, the democratic party still doesn't admit they put him there, and is likely to hobble the newcomers sufficiently to put trump in again.
no sympathy for the american electorate, when you are dim, ignorant, and passive, you must habituate yourself to pain.
1
-
1
-
1
-
and if bernie gets the nomination, the dnc swings into action in his support? seems unlikely. even as president, he will get little done, and without legislation, it will all be undone when he goes. these talking heads make a living by chatting about celebrity politics, but it's just froth.
usa needs revolution. would be nice if it were a change to democracy, but no one is talking about democracy- there will be change, because the national economy is hollow and crash inevitable. it will be a coup, because the generals will be suffering too, and it will succeed, because the whole nation despises politicians, for cause.
not necessarily a bad thing, by the way- china has flowered without pretending to democracy. patriotic generals might be socialist.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
you vote for politicians known to be war-mongers, and complain. you vote for an out-sider, and he turns out to be peaceful, aside from the odd murder, but hopelessly inept in the pretense that office is anything but a device to repair his personal fortune.
saints are invited to apply for office, and are driven from the field by corrupt competitors and crony plutocrats.
and still, no one says, "we need a new constitution, establishing democracy."
so maybe yer problem is not the rot at the top. maybe it's the ignorance and passivity from middle through bottom.
in which case, mr dore is milking laughs from people with grim futures. can't envy him, but full marks for skill.
1
-
1
-
1
-
it is the usa that threatens china. china invites peace.
it is the usa that has more military personnel than the next 10 nations put together.
it is the navy of the usa crowding the south china sea, not the navy of prc infesting the caribbean.
while prc is building roads, bridges and ports from xin jiang to piraeus,
the usa is invading weak nations such as iraq and afghanistan.
usa, and some of its lackeys, accuses prc of aggressive behavior. can you detect the lie?
china has no need for aggression, the whole world knows prc is flourishing better than any other nation. in peace prc will supplant the usa.
usa has nothing to offer, but aggression: lies, bribes, threats and simple murder, small scale and large. anyone in touch with reality knows this.
1
-
1
-
1
-
first you must realize that the foundation of the usa government was set in medieval britain. the structure was intended to prevent the taxes of the rich from being wasted on the needs of the poor. not only is the usa not a democracy, it was designed to prevent any change at all, since the people on top designed the structure and feared change. rightly so, madison was well aware that slavery had to go, not on moral grounds but simply because commerce and industry didn't need slavery and would ultimately supplant the slave plantation grandees with city wage workers. but not while he lived!
aristotle thought that the important aspect of any polity is: who decides? in the usa, this question is not clear, because madison was a smart man, and he did achieve stability, so much so that civil war was necessary to replace slavery with wage workers.
today, usa is encumbered with a ridiculously obsolete constitution, that can be modified, but only by people whose position of power is established by the constitution. this effectively means that americans are not going to enjoy the 21st century much- they have a choice of revolution, or decay.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
stop whining, serfs! you are many, and have guns. could establish democracy in a fun-filled month. but you are not citizen quality people. like horses, you are born to ride, like cows, you are born to be milked.
it's evolution in action, grazing animals turn sunshine into meat, predators turn meat into shit, shit supports grass. most animals are grazers, that's you. some are hyenas, that's politicians, some are lions. plutocrats. all must remain in balance, and not waste sunshine as well. but h.sapiens doesn't seem to realize this.
imagine claiming that the earth is inexhaustible, pollution will clean itself, there is no limit to what you can make, use, steal.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
in fact, trump is built in to the american constitution. anyone can be president, over 35 and native born. some disastrous 'anyones' have already been there, and the resulting level of management is why, in large part, america is decaying at home, and declining in foreign affairs. and it's not just presidents- rule by politician doesn't select people who know what they are doing, beyond how to get elected and stay elected, so congress has been no asset. the constitution is obsolete. no american seems to know this, still less has there be any move for a better constitution. so america's path is fixed, downwards.
1
-
1
-
1
-
comical. my clear choice for worst in my lifetime is harry truman. 1. laid the foundation for the vietnam war by allowing france to re-occupy vn. 2. backed chiang kai-shek against the advice of his own assessment team. 3. established the cia, a mistake he admitted himself, briefly. [they told him they knew where he and his family lived.] 4. threatened china with nuclear war, greatly speeding up the chinese progress to nuclear capability. pretty much single-handedly established the cold war, to compensate against republican claims he had 'lost' china.
but dubya killied many more people, wasted more money than trump has, so far. rumps only outstanding quality is his visible personal failings, he is not a politician, and lies at a childlike level only. as for his contempt for women, kennedy was younger and had commercial women and volunteers imported almost daily, an ss chore not often remarked upon. it was excused by those who knew as a reaction to the drugs he took to manage back problems. more likely to cause further problems, you would think. but perhaps he had a doctor's letter.
trump is a boil on the face of america, but not really important. his significance is that the usa political system put such a defective leader in highest office. this is one of the indicators that the american constitution is obsolete. the result will be fading from wealth and power and later dissolution of the federation.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
there are two goals in the management of a nation: one is, to provide a decent living for all its members. the other is, to extract the maximum wealth for each member of an elite group. the second goal is almost universal, but some nations strive towards the first in some degree- scandinavia most notable. republicans chase the first goal, while disguising their greed by saying anyone can prosper if they work hard. democrats are much the same, but make some gestures towards welfare.
american politics are not broken. it functions exactly as it was designed to do. the default operation of america is the rule of the wealthy for the benefit of the wealthy. this principle began with the constitution, written explicitly to make possible domination of the poor many by the rich few. the '1%' rule is not new. it began with the plantation plutocrats, continued after the civil war in 'the gilded age,' and now is the '1%,' although 1/10 of 1% is more accurate.
the usa is not broken, it is a purpose-built plutocracy, functioning as it was meant to do. if you don't like the results of the constitution, you must change it. i recommend democracy, if you are capable of it. but i fear you are not. it needs citizen quality people, and american culture and education does not produce many educated people with a sense of commu ity and justice. on the contrary, there are just too many ignorant 'bubbas,' simple racists and plain old sociopaths too sustain a democracy. that's why a creature like trump is in the oval office- he truly is the essence of america.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
i blame james madison. he created the usg, and flash-froze the nation into plutocracy.
he did it to protect his private wealth, founded on the slavery of imported africans.
that didn't last, but the protection of wealth did, and the lies necessary to sustain that idea have corrupted every aspect of usa. here we see nuclear warfare proposed as an aid to usa commercial supremacy. they also thought checking children's shoe-fit with x-rays administered by shoe-store clerks was a great sales device.
and of course, coca-cola prospered with cocaine. but they had to use sugar instead, until recently, when that proved to be a poison, as well.
to sum up, usa bad, anywhere else, better. although germany did stretch the envelop briefly with that nazi bit.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
i used to ask myself, why don't people want democracy? why do they prefer to live in a nation ruled by political gangsters, or military gangsters, or simple gangster gangsters?
short answer is, social evolution is much faster than genetic, but not nearly as strong. 20,000 years ago, homo sap did what the big man said, or his assistants would beat you up.
so we can imagine democracy, while being incapable of escaping from our heritage of submission to the alphas.
that's bad enough, but the smarties have created nuclear weapons and climate crisis, and the alphas have no clue as to keeping us from extinction. they are well-satisfied with being on top, and the future is someone else's problem.
so we watch soap-opera management of the most dangerous empire of all time, managed by a cast that could be plucked from a shakespearean comedy, and no one ever says, 'we need a new system.' all the talking heads can come up with, is 'maybe a better fool , if we can find one.'
1
-
1
-
more whip! it's really hard to dislike such a sweet guy, but i wanted to. but a sweet girl says he's a rat, so i find it's much easier. in fact , in fact, good prez, bad prez, doesn't really matter. the usa ship of state was launched to empower wealth, and very successfully. only andy yang has any substantive ideas to deal with the future, the rest just want to be in office. and andy in office would discover he could do nothing. the usa was designed to make change difficult, and radical change impossible.
but talking about elections is the only game in town, no referendum, no initiative, don't you wish you had recall? but you don't. and you put up with it. 'putting up with it' will be the end of the usa.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
if usa were a democracy, but, it isn't. because it isn't, the lizards currently in power can do as they please, so long as they have a lie to tell. i used to wonder why usa is not a democracy- there is a basic literacy, some states have democracy in their internal operation, but usa remains the creation of slave plantation plutocrats, chiefly madison. he said his constitution would last a long time, and ensure the rule of the rich, and so it has. something in the water, probably flourine. or a distillation of idiocy, sold as 'coca-cola.'
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
so no health insurance, and cv19 ramping up. you got so many personal firearms, just for this purpose, and it turns out, there ain't no heroes in among those gun-loving americans. to be fair, most of the guns are owned by right-wing wing-nuts.
but revolution is necessary, situation will not improve by polite chat on the web. i'm beginning to wish i didn't laugh at the weather underground, as pathetic as they were, they did something besides talk.
bad news folks, some societies just didn't have the structure or character to survive. it's looking like usa is going to subside into irrelevance it should fracture into 2 or 3 pieces, soon.
1
-
1
-
doesn't anyone read the constitution? or american history? without control of house and senate, presidents can do little. bernie will never control the senate, and probably not the house, either. there are a few lefty radicals now, but they still are a minority.
the democratic party is not a party of the left. they are just 'the other wing' of the political profession. fdr, with total control, just threw a few fish to the lower class, but made no attempt to establish democracy. consequently, the rich bought back what is 'their' nation, one politician at a time.
around 1900, the real progressive movement was able to establish some or all of the attributes of democracy in about half the states, this needs doing at the federal level.
but no one says so. it's quite simple - if you want the usa to be run 'for the people' you must establish democracy, so that it will be run 'by the people.'
not impossible, california is 40 million people, 5th largest economy in the world, and a very active democratic constitution. go thou and do likewise.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
usa could have democracy, if most people wanted it. very easy: threaten your politician, politely. but most people don't want democracy- they don't even know what it is. so that's why you don't have it. basically, usans are serfs. not all of course, but most.
homer sap is not naturally suited to democracy, and it rarely occurs. a few of the usa states would be democracies, if independent, but they are not independent and so in the federal sphere, as serf-like as any alabaman. among nation states, helvetia is a democracy, but corrupted and corroded by their oligarchic neighborhood.
claiming democracy, of any nature, is hypocrisy, is out-right lie, is political propaganda. see 'newspeak' and 'doublethink' for a simple description of what has been done to you.
trump is not your problem. your problem is you, and mr. hartmann. he implies that democracy is possible, and you hope that removing trump will fix something.
sorry, nope, and nope.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
they are rotten, but not democratic. you don't have democracy. if you know what it is, unlikely, you don't deserve democracy.
democracy creates citizens, if you grow up without it, you are only a civilian, submissive, a permanent adolescent, capable of complaining, incapable of acting.
what has rotted, is the false mask of 'democracy' you are sold from childhood. unfortunately, this doesn't transform the people into citizens, a slow process involving struggle and adversity. [ i am inferring from swiss history. ]
but be patient. the politicians will make themselves obsolete, if not extinct, generals will take over. [ here i infer from roman history. ]
life in a military dictatorship can be a little better for the lower classes, as they are the pool of labor generals need to placate, as the best source of soldiers.
human history is like that, and would be acceptable if it were not likely that a radically different society is necessary to prevent environmental collapse. there is a real worry, making politics almost a trivial concern.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
depending on 'good' politicians to save you, leaves you vulnerable to bad politicians exploiting you. the only long-term survival plan is to do it yourself: get democracy, use initiative to shape society, referendum to run it, through a public service operating in public.
politicians, good and bad, all say, " let me rule, and i'll take care of you." it only needs a few baddies, and society crumbles, and there is never any lack of baddies.
so if you don't get democracy first, you are wasting your time, and time is running out.
1
-
china has stolen nothing. they invited american ceos to move production to china, and specified access to the technology involved. the ceos said, 'no problem.' they thought, 'labor costs down for years, profits up, and i retire with a golden handshake.' so, no problem, for me at least. marx said something about capitalism cutting its own throat, and here you see it.
china will not collapse. their elite selection process is very much better than usa. the only fear is that usa elite may be driven to use war as a substitute for brains. they might well destroy the planet rapidly, to maintain profits. they are already destroying it more slowly, by ignoring climate change.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
what happened with the left is that this framework no longer has much relevance to modern society. there is no 'left.'
a more relevant model of human society is the african plains of 100 years ago: the rich occupy the predator niche, most are grass eaters, intellegentsia - monkeys.
there are hold-over communal binding agents of varying strength in europe, enough to support 'left' opinion and parties, but they are hollowed out by the existence of the top predator, usa. [i prefer 'evil empire.']
whatever their socialist pretensions, the leadership finds it necessary or rewarding to follow the lead of the evil empire.
there are out-liers, on the 'left,' scandis, netherland, on the right, hungary, poland, but this is ephemeral, sweden for instance, and finnland are dragged right by russia, or their leaders find it profitable to say so.
humanity is entering the post-industrial stage of evolution, class bonds are destroyed by precarious employment in service work.
meanwhile, in the underlying world of heat physics, the planet temperature drifts up. politics may well be extinct soon.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
the monarchy is a problem. its mere existence means the management of the nation is done to please the monarch.
but getting rid of the monarch does not bring democracy. the power to rule just moves from monarch to politician, or dictator, or military junta.
getting democracy is much harder, than shooting a king. you have to get a populace to stand up and announce, "we are now citizens, and rule our nation with referendum under the control of initiative."
look around you. do you see a nation capable of being citizens of democracy?
it is too hard for homer sap. the tribe is raised in submission to alphas, from days on the african savanna right up to today. that's not just habit to break, that is genetic inclination.
it's not impossible. the swiss still have some kind of proto-democracy, many usa states would be similar, if independent. but that similar is 100 years old, without further progress, and impotent against the power of the federal nation.
so the hairless ape is going to let the alphas destroy the planet.
fermi wondered why the radio spectrum was not filled with communication from the stars. it's because critters that can make radios destroy themselves with powers beyond their control.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
don't blame her. driven by poverty to renting her body from alleyways.
politicians are the inheritors of aristos, whose grandfathers were warlords, the gangsters of the day. nothing to do with 'democracy'
democracy only happens when the people organize and demand it. should be easy in an internet age but strangely, not.
turns out citizenship doesn't flourish in a plutocracy, the people are raised to be ignorant, alienated and passive. can't make a democracy out of that material. so you have politicians. think of them as leprosy of the national character- disfiguring, dispiriting and ultimately fatal. get used to life as it is, it won't get better. worse, only a matter of time.
if you want to be saved, you must save yourself. subsistence farming near a country town, if you can find a few acres.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
'democracy' is just a word, in english. almost empty of meaning, nowadays.
but it began as a greek phrase - 'demos kratia,' you see the resemblance....
and the greek phrase had a clear meaning, it was a label for a particular kind of political society. the classical greeks had many different kinds, so many different words. like eskimos, and 'snow.'
it meant a society in which the 'citizens ruled.' not kings,, not generals, and not politicians, the citizens ruled.
usa is rotten from top to bottom. this always happens in a society ruled by an elite. great inequality destroys any community.
the cure is getting democracy. is this possible? theoretically, easy. practically, looking at the quality of the usa people, maybe not. karl marx saw that nothing could be done with ignorant and alienated people, he called them 'lumpen proletariat,' and usa is mostly lumps.
when your police are thugs, when they lie in the face of photo evidence, you should take the lesson that you are cattle.
lumps, not citizens. citizens have power, you don't.
1
-
1
-
1
-
why don't americans want to know what the 'leaders' are going to do with the power? partly because their 'leaders' don't know what they can do, the structure of the state aims at stasis. partly because it's none of their business, they have no input, nor even right to know, as to what their masters will do. calling this style of national management 'democracy' is contemptible double-think, shaming the masters for their arrogance, the people for their submission. in truth the usa began as a buttress of slavery, and the minds of the 'free' people are enslaved. there may be a god, after all- this is real irony.
in any event, these debates are just simulated politics, pole-dancing to confuse the chumps as to their real status.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
democracy is a label put on a political system several thousand years ago, it is the english variant of a greek phrase 'demos kratia' which means 'the people* rule.'
applying it to an economic entity is not appropriate. labor unions don't rule, fortunately for those who are not in one. nor should they. the citizens should rule, as they do in switzerland. all the citizens, not union members. california has a very democratic constitution, if independent it would be as democratic as switzerland. really, they should secede.
capitalism gets a good press in the usa, but only because the press is owned by capitalists. if you compare the progress of china and usa over the last 40 years, it is immediately obvious that management by the communist party of china is greatly superior to management by rich individuals.
*unfortunately, demos doesn't mean 'people' in the english sense. in classical athens it labeled the warriors, eligible to vote, the citizens in political mode. the swiss did the same thing until recently. everyone should. a nation that defends itself with a militia is not inclined to bother others.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
prof wolff is left over from the anarcho-syndicalist era, 1800's, though co-ops do survive, here and there. but you can't build a democratic society on a legal system that puts political power in a narrow group of politicians, who owe their jobs to the support of big money.
that's why co-ops are rare, like platypuses.
otoh, if you get democracy first, socialism of some sort will follow. there is only one example, so no firm conclusions can be made from a little nation [swiss] with defensible mountains. they have something like democracy, something like capitalism, and something like welfare. it ain't pretty, but like those left-over co-ops, it continues to work, surrounded by elective aristocracies, lately gathered together into a german commercial empire. quite like nazt days, but without the violence.
elite rule doesn't work for long, the children of the rulers inherit wealth and are 'entitled.'
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
if you won't look at reality, you can not change it. you do not have representative 'democracy,' you never did, you have elective aristocracy. every elite governs for itself, turning public power to private advantage.
if you want society to be run for the welfare of the majority, you must get actual democracy.
'democracy' is from a greek phrase, demos kratia, which means rule by the citizens. not 'politician rule.'
representative democracy is no democracy at all, it is a lie told by the elite to blind the people to their impotence.
so there is your goal, getting democracy to benefit most people.
how to get it? in 60 years of talking about this, never a single hopeful response. most americans are utterly clueless about politics, some actually insist they have democracy, and quite a few like the idea of oligarchy, expecting to profit from it.
revolution does not come from optimism, a genuinely naive notion.
revolution comes when enraged few connect with desperate masses.
optimism is for those who imagine that just a few simple 'fixes' will transform their dystopia into a green and pleasant garden. go for it, and best of luck.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
if bernie is pres, and house is democratic, and senate democratic, the good times will return! not.
in the first place, the democratic party doesn't give a damn about the losers, the limit of their promises begin with 'the middle class.' which is why the poor don't bother to vote, and often can't jump the hurdles to voting. but the middle class must not ask for too much. many greedy people are taking advantage of the booming economy to work 2 jobs, or 3, and then blow it all paying off their hospital debt. can't do anything with people like that.
but the problem is not the standard american, pathetic as she may be. there is no visible intellectual component in american political talk, and so no indicators towards forging a better society. the whole nation is on a treadmill to oblivion, except those superior people who outfitted their private island from the profits of not paying any taxes. and that demographic tends to have nothing to say, beyond "i worked hard with my tax advisors to maintain the god-given right of wealth won by great grand dad."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
democracy at work is a nonsense.
the word means 'citizens rule.' there are no real democracies, but the swiss come close enough to suggest democracy is possible to homer sap,
enterprises can be co-ops, and powerful unions might at least have voice in the direction of large enterprises, but this has nothing to do with the management of the nation.*
the management of the nation is the business of politics. at the core of politics is the question, 'who decides?' almost invariably, the answer is a person or small group who have power to rule. they hold this power while the police and army agree to let them manage the state. elections may change the face of some or all of the power-holders, but this does not by itself signify democracy. often the new face is no different from the old, in matters of concern to ordinary people.
why is the word so popular, when the thing is never seen?
claiming democracy makes rule easier for the rulers. even north korea does it. it confuses resistance. [ see 'doublethink' ]
it makes life easier for the common person, they soothe their misery by saying ' i'm a citizen and not a slave.'
* i think pr. wolff is a secret admirer of a political notion called "anarcho-sydicalism.'
believers imagine homer sap doesn't need a state, will be much better off without. but those believers have never convinced enough people to disturb any nation's history, aside from the over-enthusiastic nutter who kills a prince. that's why his 'democracy at work' is all the democracy you need. so far, they are 0 for 1000's.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
if elections are just empty festivals of simulated public participation, who better to surge ahead than the poster boy. to be fair, pete hasn't had enough time to become as crooked as the older politicians, though the smell coming out of indiana suggests it's only a matter of time, not much time, until the chump voter starts wishing for another fairy godfather. obama showed brown americans could be president, pete will win the gay 'first,' meanwhile the only two candidates of any consequence are blanked out of the media. i try to be charitable, but it is crystal clear that fluoridation has destroyed the american brain in childhood. year after year, they vote for politicians, are dudded, and learn nothing.
1
-
the first 'democratic' revolution that i know of, was in classical hellas. it seemed to arise from the need for rowers in state galleys. i think marx was right, that objective conditions shape national character, and that's bad news for the usa. the rowers were the lowest segment of the athenian war machine, yet the most numerous and most important. there was a class cohesion there, and an organization, which doesn't happen in modern states. possibly excepting switzerland, which used to have participation in the militia by all males physically fit. so they have democracy, too. but usa doesn't at the federal level, and it shows in the divided and disengaged attitude to politics.
all nations decay, since all have rich and poor. the resulting social stresses cause the nation to collapse under exterior pressure. usa is very fortunate in that regard, defensible boundaries. however, the increasing concentration of wealth will ultimately engender a necessity to attack the rich, regardless of mercenary guards.
nowadays, climate catastrophe adds a new element- soon the great majority of young people will look at their elders with contempt and hatred. endemic brigandage will result, young vs old civil war to follow.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
the scandis are about as good as it gets, for homer sap. "so far from paradise, so close to hell," to paraphrase el presidente diaz.
they are varieties of elective aristocracy, with a monarch still. no pretense to democracy there. their saving grace has been small populations and cultural homogeneity, which has made strong unions possible, and minimal factionalism. even so, the right rules, from time to time, and the swedes were perfectly prepared to throw assange to the cia wolves, so he jumped from frying pan to fire.
norway are happiest: they found oil off-shore, and declared the income public good. profits went into a sovereign fund which will subsidize for many years.
1
-
what left? a few talking heads do not make much of a 'left.'
the usa is not a democracy, and the people have no rights, in consequence. they have privileges, extended and withdrawn at the convenience of the elite. fortunately, education does not inform them of their real status, for knowing you are a serf is very depressing. serf? perhaps you prefer 'wage-slave?'
'the party of the people' did not wait a month to resume normal action. and no one is surprised. the 'left' submits to the myth of democracy, as easily as the 'right,' for there is only one collegiate ruler of the usa, 'the state.' and it is the agent of wealth, and always has been. madison said plainly that was the design and goal of his constitution, and he clearly has delivered.
and the 'left' doesn't even know why they never make any progress. it is a blind and ignorant 'left.'
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
usa was born crooked, and unlikely to change. so much easier to take a pill than to change society. and immediate profits for the pill people.
it turns out that nations age, much as people do, and usa is actually a very old society.
it is about 230 years old, while france is on its 5th republic, and had a monarchy in the middle. and staid old china has been turned up-side down several times.
the arteries are hardening, they are hiring more police and out-fitting them with shock-troop equipment, while the quality of politician should terrify the world. the biggest military in the world is at the command of people who should not be trusted with a barrow-man's license.
erratic behavior by common people is symptomatic of a culture that has lost all sense of reality. mass murder is frequent, but mirrors the activity of the elite, who direct their 'special forces' to kill foreigners who resist usa hegemony.
we may hope this society will soon collapse, for lack of people committed to its success.
but will they get off the stage without burning down the theater?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
i was reading a book , a young and ignorant lad, when i came across the author's observation that 'money and power are bound together, and if you have one, you will soon have the other.' that seemed true, and further, it explained why humanity needed democracy if we are to have general prosperity.
and that is why the rich hate democracy, and stamp it out wherever it appears. madison was frank and explicit when he promoted his constitution to the convention, 'democracy would lead the taxes of the rich being spent on the wishes of the poor,' and he was going to prevent that. as he has, in large measure.
so, swiss aside, an honorable exception, there is no democracy in the direction of nations, although no politician fails to laud democracy in its modern form, done for you by him. it turns out democracy requires people of citizen quality. in education and character, and you only get them in a democracy. you see humanity's chief problem.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
don't complain about the dnc. you are inferior people. you let politicians rule you. like cattle, you are. california has a constitution that would make it a democracy if it were independent, but they allow dc to rule them, so still inferior. of course, seccesion would be scary, so perhaps you could say they are smart cowards, that's inferior still, innit?
usans are so degenerate, they still debate which crooked old man is the better political santa claus. to be fair, trump, biden and sanders finish under a blanket, so it's reasonable to be unsure as to which is worst, second worst and least worst. but why not get democracy and decide things like citizens instead of cattle? do you really think a trump, biden or sanders is a better person than you? what makes you think you could trust any of them with your life?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
when i read about discoveries of science, in the farthest reaches of the cosmos, and in the deepest crannies of matter, i marvel that religious myths have any attraction at all.
but humanity finds uses still, for god/s and devils. chiefly to justify being nasty to others. a convenient balm for conscience.
all religions are false. physics has superseded them, as an explanation of the world around us.
you may reasonably say, 'but we need to keep them as a guide to good behavior.' but even this is weak, secular ethics works too.
religion is propped up as a tool of domination and exploitation.
and now, back to reality, and listening to politicians justifying the world as it is, because it profits them to do so.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1