Comments by "Chrnc Avngr" (@aznmutt15) on "Joe Rogan | There is No Evidence the Earth is Flat" video.

What evidence do you have you back up your claim?
2
@robertcharles2800 it is your job to show evidence for your claim. You make a claim, you should have evidence to back it up. Saying, "I've never seen them show case a suit with boiling water and a thermometer, therefore it can't work. " Is not evidence. Where is your evidence? Why would it not work?
1
@robertcharles2800 do you even understand what i am saying. Your claim that they have not shown a space suit with boiling water is not evidence. Show me the specs, explain why, show any kind evidence that it will not work in a vacuum. What prevents it from failing? Why will it not work?
1
@robertcharles2800 https://youtu.be/uSHPxIem-14 You mean something like this? Let me guess, it's fake
1
@robertcharles2800 that's hilarious, i show you exactly what you wanted. You see the water boil, you see the glove filling up and popping. Of course it's not good enough. You need to move the goal post. Tell me how much more powerful is a perfect vacuum vs 1 torr vacuum?
1
@robertcharles2800 no. Im just waiting for you to actually back up your claims.
1
@robertcharles2800 the real problem is that you have no proof of your claim. Nor do you have any explanations why it would not work. You asked for a particular circumstance and i show it. You then move the goal post. This shows you are dishonest with yourself and are going to find fault in everything presented to you. So where is the evidence showing that it will not work in a vacuum? What is your explanation why it will fail? I want you to back up your claim. It is not my responsibility to prove it works, even though i have, it is your responsibility to explain and show it will not work in a vacuum. So please present your evidence and explain why a space suit will not work in a vacuum. Let's see if you actually understand the basics of vacuums. What is the difference in pressure from 0.1 torr to a perfect vacuum?
1
@robertcharles2800 of course we both know you will not answer any of the questions i pose because we both know you are a coward and do not want to define your understanding by giving an answer. So go ahead, prove how much of a coward you are by not explaining why a spacesuit would not work in a vacuum. Go ahead and run from a simple question. What is the difference in force from 0.1 torr vs a perfect vacuum?
1
@robertcharles2800 i do not care what they show. I am asking you to provide evidence for your claim. You claim that space suits do not work in a vacuum. Now where is your evidence? Why is it impossible for them to work in a vacuum. Remember, you are the one challenging the norm, so it is your responsibility to put forth evidence. Oh by the way, it would be a complete waste of money to put forth the test to your claims because you will move the goal post and just say it is fake.
1
@robertcharles2800 you do realize that nasa doesn't have a dedicated film production company to show all of their testing. That bowling ball and feather demonstration was funded and produced by the bbc. I showed you a video pretty much showing you what you have claimed, yet you found fault. You do realize no matter what they put forth, they could follow your criteria exactly, yet you will find fault. Do you see a film production on all of the testing in military applications? No. How about civil engineering? No. How about aeronautics? No. You want a tv show to test these claims then go and get a tv company to fund a television show to do it. Otherwise you are an idiot. You are too dumb to realize that everything you have watched is less than 1 percent of what nasa does. You make claims based off of what you can see publicly. You are watching the equivalent to the promotional videos and tv produced information about the air bus. If you watch that, do you get to see all of the schematics and testing they did to create the airbus? No. You have no clue avout what you are talking about. So either put forth evidence for your claim or shut up and stop whining about why nasa won't do what you want them to do. Why the fuck should they spend millions to fulfill the wishes of some retarded fuck. You have the understanding of an infant.
1
@robertcharles2800 no you have not put forth anything. The lack of of them fulfilling your requirements, a nobody, is not evidence. I have put forth evidence of it working in a vacuum. Now where is your evidence of it not working? The lack of evidence for your very perticular requirements, is not evidence. As i said, even if they followed every reuirement you request, you will still deny it. It is because you are a dishonest quack and you will keep lying to yourself to fulfill your beliefs. So where is the actual evidence of a suit not working in a vacuum? What is your explanation why it will not work? Obviously you don't have any evidence, but at least try answering the second question.
1
@robertcharles2800 come on. Explain why would the suits fail in a vacuum?
1
@robertcharles2800 it's funny how you call me low iq, but you have yet to put forth any evidence to back your claim. I have put forth debunking your claim. Yet, you run to the corner and hide. You wanted boiling water, i showed you a video with a space suit with boiling water in the forground. They had a glove exploding from the pressure differential. Yet that is not enough. Hmmm someone is in denial. Arguing like a five year old and scientific understand of one as well. You are just a parrot repeating what you hear. No abilitily to think for yourself like a sheep as well. No ability to think critically and objectively. Funny how you call me an npc, but when i ask you a very specofic question on why a spacesuit would fail in a vacuum, it goes against your programed questions and you cant come up with an anwer. Hmm sounds like an npc to me.
1
@robertcharles2800 you are absolutely correct. Considering that you have no evidence, no explanations, and make wild claims. I cant believe how dense and ignorant you are. Damn, i cant imagine what it must be like to be a fat blind worm, it must be hard for you to get by. Talk about npc, you can't even devolope an in depth conversation about what you talk about. Cant go into detail, can't even answer one question. I would freaking crush you in a debate.
1
@robertcharles2800 this coming from someone who has brought nothing to support his claim. A guy who can not even explain in detail why a space suit can not work in a vacuum. A guy who is parroting what he heard and can't say anything more. You are the definition of an npc. Cant think for yourself and just repeats what you are told. Seriously, you argue like a five year old. The sad fact is thst you have the scientific understanding of a five year old as well. Why dont yoi actually try anwering a question like an adult, instead of running like a coward.
1
@robertcharles2800 holy shit, this coming from a flat earther. What a fucking joke. Can't keep up with an argument, so you have to resort to name calling like a child.
1
@robertcharles2800 anyone who reads this thread will know you have not presented shit for evidence and whine about why NASA won't listen to a nobody like you. You can keep with the name calling or you can be an adult and expand on your claim or present evidence. We both know you cant do either, so you will stick to name calling like a child.
1