Comments by "clray123" (@clray123) on "Rick Beato" channel.

  1. By the same logic I should demand from you compensation for reading this comment. After all, I wrote it, and it's my IP, how dare you peruse my property without my permission? And who knows, maybe you will reuse the golden thoughts contained herein to produce your own comments, and make money from it.
    6
  2.  @MrPlavik  Exactly, the main question here is whether the copycat's production is "transformative" enough with respect to the original work. After all, genuine artists get inspiration from other works of art all the time. That, and AI companies are careful to train their models on material that they have already licensed for this purpose (even if the licensing terms are as bullshit and sneaky as Facebook's "opt out" preferences). In other words, if you think your copyrighted work was stolen AND reproduced unchanged by an AI, by all means sue that company and you will probably win in court. If your copyrighted work was just stolen (perceived) by an AI, but not reproduced, your chances may not be so good.
    6
  3. I am impressed that you believe he doesn't rehearse and edit his videos like everybody on planet Earth.
    3
  4. The difference is that AI can only imitate no what it is trained. Usually it is the final product that is being imitated/stolen. Whereas humans train themselves on ingredients/components of the final product (like mastering a single instrument). You can tell the difference in the result because oftentimes imitating the final product conflates and averages together stuff that would be separate and varied in an actual productION. This will also be a major challenge for AI to overcome because it is easy to come up with digitized final texts, music, pictures etc, but it is not easy (or possible at all) to come up with a digitized version of raw thoughts that went into creating these artifacts - because the thoughts are not recorded anywhere, but only expressed in the transform.
    2
  5. Hey, you can always sell your crap as training data to the AI company.
    2
  6. Yeah, about the same percentage who go to a shoe maker to order "bespoke" shoes. Or to a tailor to order tailored suit. Or to a book binder to order a book binding.
    1
  7.  @1wibble230  Err.. I train AI (language) models. I know how it's done and what they can reproduce, and I can assure you there is no "sensory input" and that it is not at all how humans would learn or create anything. The target function in training for which loss is minimized is to reproduce the original dataset faithfully. What you are confusing for "creativity" are residual errors and side effects, the paths not covered by the dataset, but in some spatial vicinity to it, or "hallucinations" as they are called by some AI folks. (AI researchers have historically a tendency to introduce misleading anthropomorphizing teminology at every step, lying to themselves all the way.) As for your fancy shmancy image prompts, I can assure you that if the model was not trained on something resembling your prompt in the first place (as individual image labels), it would not be able to react in any sensible way to your prompt. You get what just you put in, mixed up. Try for once applying some really creative, detailed prompt, rather than parroting the "style prompts" prepared as examples to you, and see what you get out of these models then.
    1
  8.  @CosmicPhilosopher  You do not have to "copyright" anything, copyright is there by default for anything you create. And yes, in the future I plan to monetize this comment.
    1
  9.  @UmVtCg  Sadly you are mistaken, my comment is a work of art which even surpasses the paintings that some abstract artists create and show off in galeries.
    1
  10. Maybe the real artists are those who create the AI models?
    1
  11. Just wait till you get your second and third. ;)
    1
  12. I believe it's called reverb or sounding "too wet". But overall it comes from the algorithms averaging different signals (songs) together and not being able to tell apart well what's "noise" and what's "signal". Whereas in a real song you have a mix of instruments that belong to this song only, not to any other similar sounding songs.
    1