Comments by "clray123" (@clray123) on "The future of "truth" on the Internet" video.

  1. The history of civilization.
    43
  2.  @rhael42  it doesn't matter whether it does or doesn't, it is only important that we're told that it does
    15
  3. As long as it helps us fight climate change it is okay. I'm surprised they did not explain how it contributes to the noble goal.
    8
  4. For images the metadata will likely be incorporated by the hardware chip into pixel content. This sort of metadata survives various transforms like scaling, rotation, blurring (which makes it even scarier).
    6
  5.  @blocks4857  As a small company you may not be able to comply with this complicated regulatory framework, but don't worry! We have a Solution, just use your Giant Megacorporation Platform to help you reach full compliance! For a small monthly fee of $XXX, previously known as tax.
    4
  6. The solution is very simple, if only you wish to apply it. Punish the abuse of the tool, not the tool. Just like you do not outlaw knives or try to track who owns them, but reliably go after people who decide to stab you with them. I guess the problem here is that the stabbers are the ones who are currently making the "protection" law, though.
    4
  7. We know it's not AI because it is so much dumber than what AI could come up with today.
    4
  8. Hey, we have all seen during corona that People Love To Feel Safe(tm). It's just what the People want, like the EU vaccination passes. This is why our representatives are working so hard on it.
    3
  9.  @DemPilafian  Ah if your government makes it mandatory to share the keys with them (which they can and do), I'm your math will be of little help.
    3
  10. I also love regulation when I am the only one setting the good rules for myself (and worse rules for everyone else).
    2
  11. How do you think democracy works in China today?
    2
  12.  @crowe6961  Yeah the reality of EU pushing laws rejected by 90% of the population according to polls on their own website.
    1
  13. The point is to verify whether it came from government or corporation-approved hardware. They don't care about what is "original" or not as long as you were forced to use their hardware to produce it and they can find out your identity.
    1
  14.  @morkallearns781  We neither need nor want to "uniformly enforce content authenticity". It's a sick idea born in the government thug brains.
    1
  15.  @tasseratee  too bad when the "private companies" ARE in fact part of your government... governing your life... making rules for you
    1
  16.  @LillyAnarkitty  Don't forget our brave military dropping cluster bombs on yer head in some regions.
    1
  17. No, your comment reveals that you are new to the world.
    1
  18. You will be able to upload your own freedom (for a fee) or use the default freedom supplied by the platform.
    1
  19. It will be called freedom subscription. We already have a "democracy tax" in Germany (forced to pay for lying public media whether you use them or not).
    1
  20. The only hope is that this project's real intent is to steal tons of government (e.g. your) money on consulting fees and useless legislation.
    1
  21. Don't worry, only government-approved people will be allowed to alter your metadata. For example, when they need Scientific Evidence to put you away for some time.
    1
  22. No, it can't. The metadata will be incorporated into pixels of the image.
    1
  23. I believe the only point is to prove that you took the picture, not what the picture was. Aka universal tracking of camera users.
    1
  24. It doesn't matter if a few find a way around it. The point is that the majority will not and will have to suffer the consequences. Worse yet, laws will be made to criminalize workarounds. So you will be able to "work around" it while risking prison just like you are able to "work around" the anti-drug laws today.
    1
  25. Ah yes, Trusted Computing where only Microsoft and co defines what is "trusted".
    1