Comments by "clray123" (@clray123) on "Tom Nicholas" channel.

@catsandcrafts171 Haha, the refugees are indeed "great lodgers" as long as their rent is paid by someone else (e.g. you).
1
@JohnIsUber247 "They are not going to replace majority" - they won't need to - a sufficiently violent and corrupt minority can topple a peaceful democracy unaccustomed to dealing with this kind of a force. In fact that is the whole idea behind islamic conquest - and it seems to be working according to their plans so far. P.S. When NSDAP came into power, they did not have a majority either.
1
@frankkella6899 1. By all means, do talk these issue through with your corrupt and lazy siblings. 2. We still happen to have more guns than you, so don't imagine you can threaten or blackmail us by painting yourself an entitled victim.
1
@frankkella6899 Lemme summarize your argument for you: "I will invade your home and shit on your carpet. Then I'll declare I'm not scared of consequences and it's all your [father's] fault." Thank you for your attention.
1
@frankkella6899 In other words I should shut up because you say so? Wow, man, you must have spent a lot of time to come up with this reasoned reply.
1
@frankkella6899 I did respond to your fake analogy. As for me "taking advantage of a system", I've also explained it as quite a different system - I did not just force my person on a foreign country's economy with some ridiculous guilt tripping claims about how I "deserve" "protection" because of some ridiculous "sins of past", as you and other like-minded communists are insinuating, but rather got invited by said country's educational system to study there (and after studies I started a company). Considering the amount of taxes I've paid since my arrival, I'd say it turned out like a rather good deal for both. In other words, just business based on free choice of all the involved parties. People who are against unconstrained economic immigration today have never had this attitude about (let's say) greencard visa policies. The only objection is to a scenario in which it is the immigrants alone who forcibly enter the target country while offering nothing in exchange (except their ridiculous religion and demands) and incurring immediate costs on their unwilling hosts.
1
@frankkella6899 Well, at least you can understand that treating your "fellow immigrants" as having the same mindset as you is a big mistake.
1
@Beowolf-jy5rc The immigrants are people too and do not want to do your shit jobs. Especially not for shit pay that is offered.
1
When you let these people free, they will not gratefully accept your shit jobs, they will turn to hustling and criminality instead. You see plenty of these people near train stations in Germany, selling drugs.
1
Own nothing and be happy (living where your government wants you to and going to war when they decide your time's up). The glorious future happily embraced by Tom Marx with a smirk on his face.
1
Uhhh.. I consider myself conservative-leaning but never watched or even heard of "PragerU" until this video. Could it be it is some leftist puppet account that our Marxist friends use as their strawman?
1
The money is not gone, today it's in the pockets of those who managed the great Covidian Spending Programme. Or in their accounts in Panama, as may be. But you kept clapping and you still want more government spending and would love another does of covidianism. So as a reward you will get higher taxes. So that these beloved activities of your government which only wants to "keep you safe" continue getting financed, whether it's bankrupt, corrupt or not. Because of course getting rid of the corrupt government would be "libertarian" and very sinful indeed.
1
The worry is that the new immigrants will not give a shit about their aging "oppressors" who let them in. Which is indeed a very legitimate concern given all the "social justice" warriors out there.
1
Oh, you can find out what "excess profit" is, just tax the fuck out of the businesses until they die. Then you can establish a new communist dictatorship, make sure you have the military guys on your side! How about that scenario for equality and justice? It's been applied in the past, Mr. Economist (with mixed results). Ahh and as for the evil landlords, why not make the entire population live in the state-owned luxurious apartments? After all this has been tried as well with such great success in the Soviet bloc - no landlords necessary! Wow, you are so full of amazing ideas for Britain's future economy.
1