Comments by "A.J. Hart" (@cobbler88) on "Liberal Teens vs Conservative Parents | Middle Ground" video.

  1.  @isabellamariazeta7115  You mean the terms that seem to only be enforced in one direction, that change on a regular basis, correct?
    10
  2. Thank you for proving the point about lack of accountability on the part of women.
    6
  3. And I am not surprised in the least that you, as a Jewish woman, felt compelled to let us know what you think.
    4
  4. It's not a bad thing. But they need to recognize when it is and is not helpful or worth factoring into decisions. Great. I'm sensitive to the fact that a person might have had a childhood filled with confusion. If he claims to be trans so that he can enter the ladies room and touches my niece, they'll find pieces of him in at least a dozen different counties. Sensitivity and emotion often make for hurdles when it comes to solving problems. And they make for poor legislation. A sensitive and aware society is a nice goal. But they are horrible FOUNDATIONS for a society.
    3
  5. I don't need to see liberal teens getting shut out of another debate.
    1
  6.  @patrickmason7466  No. It has little to do with trans people, and - as fairly clearly spelled out in the first sentence - everything to do with what happens when you start rushing to cater to certain groups - in this case, a microscopic one - while ignoring the domino effect and opportunities that result from coming down with the do-something disease. So I think you were reading it from one place, when it was written from another. No big. It happens.
    1
  7.  @Not.afitnesspro  Also the more educated you THINK you are. I can't recall who said it, but it was something akin to, "I'll trust a plain-spoken person more than a person who fancies himself as educated, because if you lay out a logical enough trail of breadcrumbs you can get an educated person to believe almost anything."
    1
  8.  @patrickmason7466  It never fails. Whenever someone tells someone that they're a moron or questions their intelligence, the sentence putting that forth almost always includes a misspelling. At least you threw a punctuation error in there for consistency. 🤣 I can torture English and grammar rules all I want because I don't make a practice of resorting to that sort of ad hominem attack. I just try to not do so. I'm intellectually curious enough that discussions of issues do not include that sort of thing when you have actual arguments you can put forth. But I understand that not everyone is willing to burn the calories necessary to put forth thoughtful arguments. Instead, they'll drone on about their personal idea of "fair," "equal" or say something akin to "because it's in the Bible." Whether you asked for something is as relevant as your previous reply was. It's what you begged that's important, and in that case it was for clarification of what you misread or didn't understand. But apparently your ego couldn't handle simply acknowledging a miscommunication and moving on. You had to reply fairly nonsensically again, basically posting as much filler as you thought necessary before you arrived at your desired destination, which was to question my intelligence - something I had never made any great claims regarding. Regardless, the idea that groups should be catered to equally is obviously laughable on its very surface. I mean, a person CAN spend a great deal of time pondering it, but it only takes a few seconds. This is aside from the fact that we have proven throughout our history that - humans are incapable of pulling this off to any significant scale. This was the case long before today when, once a group DOES have pretty much equal rights, it draws a new line in the sand and claims it still has less while pushing for more. This is what happens when you give more credence to the perception of others than objectivity. We're paying the price for that practice now, big time. Take care.
    1
  9.  @Seeeeeeeeuhhhhh  Yeah. It's always a big mistake to assume a mass of people is going to treat a word as defined, rather than adding nuance that isn't there. It's one way they've been able to move the bar in a few cases, societally. For example, "racism" NEVER included some exercise of power. Then we arrived in the 80s and 90s and it was sneaked in there so as to pretend that Affirmative Action is not a racist practice. And, to borrow a word you used, it's like tolerance. I would say we have a great deal of tolerance. But to the emotionally unstable masses, tolerance has to include acceptance and support, and that's not what tolerance is.
    1
  10.  @motherlove8366  Yes. They're no more sensitive. They're just bigger bitches. It's like saying that a group of sight-impaired people is "a generation of much better listeners." No. Them niggaz is just blind. 🤣
    1
  11. Thank you for basically demonstrating that you're incapable of recognizing that both can actually be true.
    1
  12. It's okay. It was more meant for people who believe in accountability for their actions.
    1
  13.  @brynndally9869  Yes. That does account for a microscopic percentage of pregnancies. Care to derail the conversation in any other way?
    1
  14.  @brynndally9869  I'm sorry you so greatly overestimate the percentage of the time that this actually happens.
    1
  15. Being willing to entertain people spouting them doesn't mean the ideas are any less ridiculous.
    1