Comments by "Viceral Man" (@viceralman8450) on "Imperial War Museums" channel.

  1. They invaded Kuwait.
    4
  2. They don't have as they can pay its production.
    3
  3. Source?
    3
  4. Tanks are more tank 50% of an army fighting power.
    3
  5. They let him its army was gone.
    2
  6. THey are mediums, as they weigh 30 tons or more, lights tankw weight less than 30 tons.
    2
  7. Javelin is better as it is fire and forget plus it has three attack modes.
    2
  8. Due to wider bogie space.
    2
  9.  @busterdee8228  It’s a great question never thought about it myself.
    2
  10. Ukraine didn't even had 2.700 lol.
    2
  11. lol they didn't because they changed mission.
    2
  12. Did you forgot that Sadam invaded Kuwait first and tried to take most of the oil production in the planet?
    2
  13.  @Boppy-B-B  Proximity fuse ammo destroy them with ease, and those rounds are extremely cheap.
    1
  14. lol you have no clue buddy. Sherman was of high quality but economy of scale maked possible making many.
    1
  15.  @Kuwandi  They will be vulnerable to jamming.
    1
  16. The Frech discovered the Panther was very problematic vehicle, riddled with mechanical problems so they initially tried that then abandoned the idea.
    1
  17. MANPADs are for air targets. 🤦‍♂🤦‍♂
    1
  18. During ww2 only soviet tanks used diesel anybody else used gasoline. and Diesel also burns especially when struck by high velocity ammunition.
    1
  19. Panther was designed as a heavy tank in german doctrine.
    1
  20. @ Lol wikipedia, read german field manuals Sherlock. It was a heavy tank meant to operate alongside medium panzer battalions therefore its thin side armor made it more agile. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_EUp1_FZWUQ
    1
  21. ​@ Its explained on the video. But due to doctrine and operational use.
    1
  22.  @stevenwhitacre4680  Did you watch the video?
    1
  23. And AA artillery plus electronic warfare highly effective against drones.
    1
  24. 🤣🤣Don´t be ridiculous wehraboo
    1
  25. LOL sure because NATO is going to use the same useless and ineffective tactics that Russia uses and have caused such horrendous loses, right? NATO will use combined arm so those ATGMs teams will be eliminated before they can do something.
    1
  26.  @Privacidadpls  Yes is Not going to fall in those errors because NATO is not a circus like the russian army.
    1
  27.  @Privacidadpls  Yeah, they aren't a circus they are auge parade of circuses. Yes, but if you use proper tactics those ATGMs will not hit or even be fire at you so you don't need to resist them at all. If you relay on your armor your tactics are extremely poor.
    1
  28.  @Privacidadpls  And those alongside them eliminate ATGM teams unlike Russia, and that's the reason of their high loses. If you relay on armor that means you failed in everything else as the survivability onion shows.
    1
  29. THe myth lmao
    1
  30. Iff the Germans were able to reach the front before breaking down or run out of fuel you mean. 😂😂
    1
  31. THey were quite rare in WW2
    1
  32. How would a NATO gun be used against NATO tanks for example? If only NATO operates such gun?
    1
  33. lol you even watched the entire video; you miss all the logistic part.
    1
  34. Air campaigns are in effective in making countries surrender, to date the only one that has surrender to air power was Serbia.
    1
  35. MANPAD menas man portable air defense so no idea what you are talking about.
    1
  36. The T-34 was a terrible tank, it's only considered the "best" tanks to 80 years of soviet propaganda. Faster false the transmisión of then keep it from been fast and the design was mid as best with a cramped interior, difficult to escape from and the engine died constantly.
    1
  37. Being mechanically reliable, be repaired on the field, be made faster, being modular, being affordable, being mass produced, having great tactical mobility.
    1
  38. That myth again, asks Michael Wittman how his entire collum was decimated by only a Firefly.
    1
  39. Merkava protection against kinetic proyectiles is not good for modern standard so the T-14 comes on top.
    1
  40. Sure Wehraboo
    1
  41. It was, the Germans since its design.
    1
  42. That doesn't work with ATGMs anymore. lol
    1
  43. Source dude trust me
    1
  44. They have like in Kharkiv, during the offensive that liberated the Oblast.
    1
  45. lol a tank museum is wrong but I the YT comments fool is right.surreeee
    1
  46. lol they explained its advantages were logistics, versatility, and reliability, what made German tanks bad was poor logistics, unreliability and limited versatility that's why they lost yet you fail to realice a tank is more than speed, gun, and armor
    1
  47. Better in all departments than it..
    1
  48. lol
    1
  49. 🤣🤣 Like the Panzars after losing the war?
    1
  50. Some in museums most scrapped.
    1
  51. Yeah, they just expended 9 months and suffered staggering loses for fun such victory lol.
    1
  52. lol the Sherman was the most survivable tank of WW2.
    1
  53. loll watch the video fool
    1
  54. soviet guns were 125mm
    1
  55. lol
    1