Comments by "Viceral Man" (@viceralman8450) on "AiTelly" channel.

  1. Video made by Ryan Macbeth about how the Patriot works on an operacional level is a great complement to this video.
    13
  2. Lol russias best active MBT still has a manual transmission and sticks to drive. 😂😂
    9
  3. And that’s why the crew turns in to cosmonauts just before passing to the after life. 😉
    8
  4. Sure, pal that's why it's part of an air integrated defense bs dones are the task of shot to medium range air defenses not patriot. 🤦‍♂🤦‍♂
    4
  5.  The Reddit Experience  Leo 2a4 from 1985 old vehicle, crew by incompetent soldiers, 20 T-90M lost do far in Ukraine a very modern vehicle crewed by the alleged Russian tank elite. 🤫
    4
  6. Its funny because it has been caught on camera multiple times, for example: "Russian tank explodes hurling turret 250ft into the air after Ukrainian missile strike" ans that's why the Russia tank force has more hours fly ours than the russian air force.  @Blackbadger554 
    4
  7. Kornet ATGM does no have top attacks capabilities. Guys your research isn’t good enough.
    4
  8. Airborne Iskander-M ballistic missile, just another Russian wundderwaffe made of pure hype.
    3
  9. lol they were upgraded 7 times since their introduction on the 1980's.
    3
  10. AMP-HE will replace all the other rounds except APFSDS.
    3
  11. It goes boom and most of the crew perishes.
    3
  12.  @saucy743  That's why they are moving to western tanks, they are better and don't turn in to spaceships after one hit.
    3
  13. lol superior are you high?
    2
  14. Souce Kremlin propaganda. 😂
    2
  15. It can barely go above 60 km/h what are you talking about?
    2
  16. This week it shot down one. Cope🤫
    2
  17. They weight 66.8 tons. simple
    2
  18.  @SCP--op2eq  M1A2C the latest Abrams weights 66.8 tons loaded.
    2
  19.  @qasimmir7117  Obsolete composite armor is inmune to HESH.
    2
  20.  @thewomble1509  HE-AMP does that but better. Therefore HESH is obsolete also the Challenger 3 will use a smoothbore gun so it can't use HESH.
    2
  21. North Korea because they are heading towards ocean so there’s no point to shoot them down. 🤦‍♂️
    2
  22. Gonna cry Ivan?
    2
  23.  @deven6518  Sure and why everyone else move from those years ago if they ar so good?
    2
  24.  @dust_gale3108  Poor ruskie its army is so broke they can afford to upgrade their tanks and install automatic transmissions now they must hire bots to cope online for that. 🤡
    2
  25.  @okman6298  Cope Ivan.
    2
  26.  @saucy743  Cry harder Ivan.
    2
  27. Yes, there's a escape hatch on the floor of the tank.
    2
  28. "Successful"
    2
  29. Germany delivered yesterday 18 Leopard 2a6 alongside 40 Marder IFV.
    2
  30. lol vatniks are coping.
    2
  31. 🤡Das clown. 😂😂
    2
  32.  @agentusm7871  The ammo racks there have blow out panels and blast doors, or the use insensitive ammo propellant that can't detonate instantly.
    2
  33.  @T--wk9oe  Like in the Sun video where the Russian tank instantly detonated vaporizing the crew and sending the turret 80 meters on the air? The old leopards 2a4 from 1985, the design was change unlike russian pipe bombs with tracks.
    2
  34.  @uçanspagetticanavarı  Well yes but i wasn't designed with the Middle East in mind either.
    2
  35. 🤣🐷🇷🇺🐷 Typical vatnik delusion.
    1
  36. The abandonment of the Bundeswehr has nothing to do with the mechanical reliability of the vehicles, just the state of the German army.
    1
  37.  @ridwanhusainishraq  Lol Leopard can eliminate a Tiger from 10 kilometers away tiger can do nothing to a Leopard 2. 🤣🤣 Poor naive fool!!!
    1
  38.  @ridwanhusainishraq  Lol Leopard can eliminate a Tiger from 10 kilometers away tiger can do nothing to a Leopard 2. 🤣🤣 Poor naive fool!!!......................................
    1
  39.  @ridwanhusainishraq  Modern tanks are much more reliable than WW2 tanks, plus their maintenance is faster and easier on the field. 🤦‍♂🤦‍♂🤣
    1
  40. LOl for sure those 850 Russian tanks destroyed themselves. 🤣🤣
    1
  41.  @Doomer1984  Javelin is for neutralizing armor, the Russians have lost about 850 MBTs so definitely is working.
    1
  42.  @Doomer1984  Yeah so bad they save Kiev and Kharkiv from the Russian, took Severodonestsk back against all odds inflicting 30.000 deaths and over 60.000 casualties, for the defender casualties don't matter which matter is resistance.
    1
  43.  @biswajitsarkar664  Yeah they moved about 30 BTGs towards Kiev and tried to take Hostomel at the beginning of the war just for fun right? Same with Kharkiv. Are short form the mind of something?
    1
  44.  @biswajitsarkar664  Must be the lame Russian excuse of "distraction".
    1
  45.  @biswajitsarkar664  If you consider winning making fail Rusia attempt of conquest they are winning in that case. Russia has lost 1/3 of its operative tank fleet they have like another 2.000 to be destroy. Sure, duddy a distraction that's why they send their best units of the VDV and Spetsnaz to Hostomel to be eliminated and their best armored units to Sumy to follow the same faith, a genius maneuver.
    1
  46.  @blackmantis3130  They are which important city the russians hold?
    1
  47.  @blackmantis3130  They are not Odessa, or Kharkiv, or Kherson, or Poltava, Kyiv or any actual important city in a strategic manner. Just little victories for Russia to cope.
    1
  48.  @blackmantis3130  They aren't in a strategic way as other cities have more importance by far like Odessa, what's russia going to do with the nuclear plant a second Chernobyl? They have access to the azov sea but are in range of Ukrainian anti-ship missiles from Odessa they are pretty much useless. Now russia is burning resources to take not second tier cities but useless towns like Bajmut and they can't even achive that now.
    1
  49.  @ДенисДавыдов-ф1е  lol S-400 can't lock on and shoot to an F-35/F-22 unless it gets closer than 32 kilometers, good thing anti radar US missiles can destroy the S-400 radar array from 90km away. 🤫
    1
  50. Not at all it still there otherwise the Leopard would only be able to carry 20 rounds. 🤥
    1
  51.  @michaeld.uchiha9084  No they haven't you have less than half the ammo the Leopard can carry, (just double checked and the turret rack can only hold 15 rounds) the ammunition you should have, that will more presure on logistics and reduce the operational range on the tank significantly, from 42 rounds to 15 what a bunch of nonsense.
    1
  52. They have non, the things hasn’t even be installed yet.
    1
  53. 20 lost for far. There.
    1
  54.  The Reddit Experience  How it performed better if it is a far modern vehicle and still 20 units were lost so far?
    1
  55.  The Reddit Experience  Most where eliminated in open ground away from cities or towns exactly the environment were develop to fight in.
    1
  56. 🤡🇷🇺🐷
    1
  57. They were relying on as they have lost 510 of them, or 37% of their fleet.
    1
  58.  @saucy743  62 T-90s were lost of which, 20 are T-90M, 34 T-90A, 7 T-90S and 1 T-90K. Russia had 200 or so t-90s active in the area has because they lost 62 already.
    1
  59. Lol the damage was minimal and the launcher was already repaired. The Pentagon😂
    1
  60.  @kosove9  Sure Ivan any proof they fired 36 missiles?
    1
  61.  @daemianbox  The pentagon confirmed, it Ukraine press try to denied to deceive the russians and keep actual capabilities hidden.
    1
  62.  @xtensionxward3659  Since Patriot was introduced the Russian forgot about Khinzal what a coincidence, looks like the Wunderwaffen was just smoke and mirrors.
    1
  63.  @xtensionxward3659  🤣🤣🤣 Vatnik mental gymnastics are quite hilarious, so where did that Wunderwaffen go not even the Russian media is hyping it anymore?
    1
  64.  @xtensionxward3659  What happened to Khinzal then, looks like everybody saw thought the Kremlin hype.
    1
  65.  @xtensionxward3659  Sure, so why even the Russian propagandist doesn't talk about it anymore, it's like it not effective anymore.
    1
  66.  @SCP--op2eq  The original M1 weight was 55 tons.
    1
  67. HESH is obsolete.
    1
  68.  @robertpatrick3350  Obsolete in all aspect compared to modern ammunition.
    1
  69.  The Reddit Experience  Its pretty easy frontally the gunner just has to hit the lower glacis and boom. From the side just aim low and center boom.
    1
  70.  The Reddit Experience  Apfsds will fragment and keep going until it hits the engine then boom.
    1
  71.  @lunaticcultist9741  Ukraine does not operate the T-90.
    1
  72. Multipurpose HEAT its been replaced by the HE AMP-T smart shell. And the gun has 55 calibers in lenght not a regular L 44 anymore.
    1
  73. Gonna cry, Ivan?😂
    1
  74. Don’t know Rock seems fake.
    1
  75. lol what a Buch of horse dung, the slowest Abrams loader can only qualify for the rol with just 8.58 rounds per minute otherwise he will be expeled of training, 6.9 seconds per reload but an excelente loader can do 12 rounds a minute or 5 seconds per reload. In the other hand a T-90 carousel takes 8.5 seconds to find the shell and load to a reach a less than impresive 7 rounds a minute. 🤣🤣
    1
  76.  @sashadala346  No, pal check some Abrams training videos.
    1
  77.  @sashadala346  Sure, proof?
    1
  78.  @sashadala346  lol text is not proof.
    1
  79.  @sashadala346  lol sure pal, the funniest thing is there's videos here in YT where a loader loads 12 rounds a minute, that how you know, your claims are BS. 🤣🤣
    1
  80.  @deven6518  lol keep rolling the myth of Russian equipment roughness cuz it is a bunch of crap.
    1
  81. If the Pentagon send them to Ukraine, they already solved the logistics.
    1
  82. The T-90 is just a T-72BU with another name to hide its nature as at the time the T-72 had an extremely poor reputation after been decimated during Desert Storm.
    1
  83. lol
    1
  84. Lol now Rafael Defense Sytems is American. 🤦‍♂️
    1
  85. Heat is not problem as anything warmer than background will stand out in a thermal camera., so any moving part will show there.
    1
  86. Latest Chally 2 variant is so heavy, and the engine so underpower that it now the slowest tank on NATO.
    1
  87.  @thewomble1509  TES is te standard deployment variant the British army uses, it weights 75 tons.
    1
  88.  @thewomble1509  Sure buddy. l
    1
  89. If the S-400 is so good why it was unable to protect Engels-2 air base, the Kerch bridge and so on?
    1
  90.  @andrewschliewe6392  The Abrams have one.
    1
  91. What a bunch of BS the museum piece t-62 they have like 800 of them and barely modernized them before been thrown to the front to be turn in to scrap. 🤣🤣
    1
  92. 😂😂 No es como que los filtros fuesen rediseñados corrigiendo el problema en 1995 hace décadas.
    1
  93. 🤣🐷🇷🇺🐷 Typical vatnik delusion.....
    1
  94. Lol shoot down some days ago. Cope
    1
  95.  @Aitelly  The ammo still is unprotected but the ammo propellant was modified to be much much difficult to detonate or catch fire if it is hit directly or by shrapnel.
    1
  96. lol cope.
    1
  97. Lol
    1
  98.  @KGmVN  Not at all just one hit will immobilize the tank leaving the crew, vulnerable.
    1
  99. Jay you are wrong. Abrams SEPv 3 weight 66.8 tons, Loe 2a6 weight 62 tons, Leclerc 57 tons, K2 55 tons and Chally 2 TES 75 metric tons empty and 80 tons loaded been the heaviest tank currently in service in the world. All are MBTs tank stop been classified by weight on the late 70's.
    1
  100. Go as smart gets false information all over the hull place, the difference in ground pressure is tiny 0.89 kg/cm2 for the leopard vs 0.95 kg/cm2 for Abrams, the the wedge add on armor is hollow. 🤦‍♂️
    1
  101.  @nagmashot  No its 0.95kg/cm2 just as the US army field manual says. Only 0.06 kg/cm2 than the leopard 2. 🤣🤣🤦‍♂
    1
  102. With patience and anus clenching on part of the crew.
    1
  103. Cope
    1
  104. Paint scratch. 🤣🤣
    1
  105.  @thanhcongnguyen8094  A bigger paint scratch.
    1
  106.  @thanhcongnguyen8094  Like 2.000 MBTs Russia has lost so far? Because this one's aren't crew by Turks anymore.
    1
  107.  @thephoenix756  So far 20 have been lost in Ukraine, lol.
    1
  108.  @thephoenix756  Of the 13 destroyed 5 lost the turret and the rest cocked off. Not a great record by any standard.
    1
  109.  @saucy743  In terms of tech sure they are, go ahead show a video were a turret of a western tanks' flies 80 meters on the air. 😉
    1
  110.  @T--wk9oe  Got hit, crew became cosmonauts in less than a blink of an eye.
    1
  111.  @T--wk9oe  Sure, pal. lol
    1
  112.  @thephoenix756  If the carousel is hit the entire tank will explode in one hit as the propellant is all stored side by side.
    1
  113.  @thephoenix756  Leopard 2 uses insensitive propellant that won't detonate even if stoke directly, Challenger 3 next standard variant will store all its ammunition behind blast doors and blow out panels, Leclerc uses insensitive propellent and uses fuel tanks to protect the ammo and Merkava Mk 4 place is round in an individual armored been so each round is protected and if one catches fire it will not lead to a chain reaction explosion. Meanwhile Russians sit on top of 22 rounds ready to blow up.
    1
  114.  @thephoenix756  Rheinmetall implemented insensitive propellant years ago there's pictures of the trials the ammo won't detonate even if they are directly hit by an RPGs, unlike Russian carousels.
    1
  115.  @thephoenix756  Go check the test pictures are online.
    1
  116.  @thephoenix756  A hit from above, below or form the side will make it detonate, Leopard 2 ammo has a propellant that does not detonate even if it is hit directly.
    1
  117.  @thephoenix756  Good thing tandem HEAT exist. One thing is killing one two crewmen and other quite different is the entire tank detonating killing everyone and destroying the vehicle entrily likr in russian desings.
    1
  118. There's hundreds of such detonations in camera cope harder.  @GuayusaPure 
    1
  119. lol dude what you take to make you so high?
    1
  120.  @nattygsbord  lol and old obsolete gun that can't fire modern APFSDS. 🤦‍♂🤦‍♂
    1
  121. @Edp Yep, upgrading museum pieces, nowadays an suggesting they are better than modern vehicles it's just laughable.
    1
  122. Griffin II 🤫
    1
  123.  @uçanspagetticanavarı  Abrams was designed to combat on Europe in case WW3 started with the soviets.
    1