Comments by "Viceral Man" (@viceralman8450) on "IS-2: When 85mm is not enough" video.

  1. Sure man now get to the back alive. 🤣🤣
    3
  2. No, no equivalent to the Tiger 2 it had both better armour and firepower than both the Tiger and Panther.
    2
  3. The Tiger 2 front turret was 180mm thick.
    1
  4. The IS-2 was a breakthrough tank designed to punch holes in the enemy lines, and there was no bunker or fortification that could withstand a HE shell of 25kg, and it can carry about 28 shells, 20 of them were HE and the other 8 AT.
    1
  5.  @kingfish2703  It was not a anti-tank because HE had horribly drop and it was only capable of destroying tanks like a panzer 4 but disabling the big cats and disabled mean they can shoot back and kill you so better use APHE for that task and they lacked a piercing cap so they bounced a lot from hard target and finally a problem of all HE shells they detonate in contact anything so if you argent in behind something you have to shoot twice.
    1
  6.  @kingfish2703  Depends of the thickness of the armor and the place of impact but why taking a bet?. Instead of using the right shell that guarantees a kill?
    1
  7.  @kingfish2703  You can't find any because they were never use as such they were used as bunker busters and didn't have incredible amount of explosives just 3.8 kg, look for what a ISU-152 did to a Panther with their HE shells that had more than 5 kg of high explosive each.
    1
  8.  @kingfish2703  Yeah those stories are from 152mm HE, just look for panther destroyed by ISU-152 the images are impressive destroyed like toys.
    1
  9.  @kingfish2703  Exactly or even hit there's a picture of a Panther destroyed by a HE hit near it.
    1
  10. No
    1