Comments by "Graeme Peters" (@graemepeters5717) on "History Debunked" channel.

  1. 19
  2. 12
  3. 5
  4. 4
  5. 3
  6. 3
  7. 3
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. Most people don't even know the definition of the Holocaust. No-one denies the persecution of the Jews during WW2. They were used as slave labour, imprisoned in camps, herded into ghettos, had their possessions stolen and many were arbitrarily shot or hanged. None of this though is part of the Holocaust. The word means 'holy fire' and relates specifically to the systematic killing and incineration of Jews. The Holocaust is only alleged to have occurred at 6 out of more than 4,000 concentration camps. Auschwitz-Birkenau, Belzec, Chelmno, Majdanek, Sobibor, Treblinka. All 6 were located in Poland. All 6 were 'liberated' by the Russians. There are no 'death camp' allegations about any of the camps liberated by American, British or Canadian forces. There was briefly an allegation about Buchenwald, but the British Government later admitted that this was just "wartime propaganda". Over 15 years, I examined the claims and 'evidence', trying to find proof to support what I had been told about the Holocaust as a child. I don't 'deny' the Holocaust, but I have yet to find any proof or evidence that holds up to close scrutiny! For example, The claim that 4m Jews were 'murdered by the Nazis' at Auschwitz (the ONLY camp alleged to have used Zyklon B/cyanide gas to kill people). This has since been modified to 1.1m then 900k 'people who died, mainly Jews'. For 50 years, it was claimed that the Germans had destroyed all the records of deaths at the camp. In the early '90s, Russia admitted that they had 'the 46 books of death', and gave copies to the Auschwitz Museum , where they are on display. They record the name, age, religion and cause of every death. This shows that the total death toll (which matches the records of the Red Cross stationed there) at 69,000. 46% of those who died were Catholic. 44% were Jewish. The World Almanac does not show a reduction of 6m Jews in the World between 1937 and 1947. Statistics show there were fewer than 6m Jews living in German occupied Europe. These are just documented, historical facts. Why would anyone be offended by them?
    1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. In March last year, when the Health Protection (Coronavirus) Regulations 2020 went through Parliaments, they added a note about Clauses 49 & 50. Clause 49 relates to the quarantining of people with the virus. Clause 50 is about the lockdown. The following note was added to the documents in the House of Commons library: Restricting movement and quarantining. Clause 49 introduces Schedule 20 which would provide public health officers with the power to quarantine those who have tested positive (or inconclusive) for coronavirus or those they reasonably suspect have the disease. It would also provide police officers and immigration officials with powers to take people they suspect have coronavirus to be tested or assessed by public health officers. Clause 50 introduces Schedule 21 which would provide each of the UK governments with the power to issue directions prohibiting any event or gathering. It would also provide UK governments with the power to close or restrict access to any premises. Taken together, clauses 49 and 50 would provide each of the UK governments with wide-ranging powers to restrict the freedom of movement of citizens in order to prevent the spread of the virus. However, there are no powers in the Bill which would allow directions to be issued requiring individuals to have prior permission or good reason to leave their homes. Neither would the Bill give the police or immigration officials powers to enforce elongated quarantines of people who have not been assessed for the virus by public health officers. Yet here we are!
    1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1
  51. 1
  52. There may be a reason why the men at Manchester Airport have not been charged. The only "violent, vicious thug" (Tice) was the police officer! Having seen the videos, yes, there was a violent confrontation with the police officers. It began when the face-kicking, head-stamping officer grabs the man (who was not resisting) by the neck and slams his head against the vending machine. In response, the second man, the brother of the first, pushed the officer away and got punched in the face!. The first man was also punched in the back of the head by the other officer. However, that man was lying prone on the floor. He had been immobilised by a Tazer. The offending officer was NOT being threatened, nor in any danger at all. At NO POINT did anyone go after the firearms! There can be NO justification for a police officer to kick anyone in the face and stamp on his head - EVER! PC Thug then goes on to stamp on and punch the other man, who had his hands behind his head and is kneeling on the floor as instructed! So many of the commenters see the racial origins of the men as a justification for what happened. Some believe the events beforehand make it ok. Is that REALLY what we want from our police? If a member of the public had kicked and stamped on someone laying on the floor, he would have been immediately arrested and charged with assault. Why should the standards be lowered because he is wearing police uniform? Would they welcome the same behaviour by police officers against their own family or friends? The CPS know that they will not be able to claim violent disorder by the two men, when the videos show their actions were IN RETALIATION to physical attacks by the police officers.
    1
  53. 1
  54. 1
  55. 1
  56. 1