Comments by "watcher57" (@watcher5729) on "Hindustan Times" channel.

  1. God help us prevent harsher with retailatory escalations
    1
  2. Too much trust in planes and munitions.numbers AA and bombs against them is higher . Escalation is a lose lose for people.
    1
  3. Its time for the kibg to retire. Times arenylt going tp be in his favor for l9ng if he kerps pulling on this war too long.lots of unfovoring figures looking for faulter.
    1
  4. It looks like its a message more than a destructive mean.unmanned gun boats comming sea gaurdians?
    1
  5. Septembre tensions
    1
  6. New Ai gun show tests
    1
  7. Stalmates
    1
  8. A new Eu military will make more sense now on
    1
  9. For some fearing the desperate times a SCAPEGOATED DIVERSIONAL tactic of war is a way out from scrutiny . May god help us who suffer the greedy elites agendas.
    1
  10. Scary scenario ukraine type war intbe region
    1
  11. Some look for consensus for funding and buildup ahainst the threat
    1
  12. 2B tested in the field? i hope not
    1
  13. German type high end optic radars with fused rounds can be useful as an APS.top attack detection and all
    1
  14. Last year declaration of boost.
    1
  15. Scary
    1
  16. 6 ktns death rates ?
    1
  17. Likleywhen they recieve the war pkanes they ll target high end russian equippment to prevoke a hatder retaliation by russia to gain consent of Nato
    1
  18. Smells like a global Sectarianism consent implementation
    1
  19. Economic rivalry 2.0. Piper needs his pay
    1
  20. indian mirage/gripen
    1
  21. Once its polish terrotory itll be in nato country
    1
  22. God forbid this escalation as it will encourage a deeper cold ware dusystopian sectarianism everywhere.
    1
  23. Hypersomic ballistic kitchen misdile
    1
  24. Secatarian blackouts .bladerunner dipiction comming true?
    1
  25. Sea drones and maritime surveillence consensus buildups ? Buying stock
    1
  26. Push 2 shove escalations could create a consensus in makinh the targeting of satelites and other assets .
    1
  27. I hope this wont be a consensus for furthur scakations. A prevocation for rally arounf the flag
    1
  28. scary potential himars launched atacms with Subs and storm scalp versions.god forbied harsh retailation to push into deep cold war with ukraine being taken over terrotory of nato neighbours.this hurts everyone
    1
  29. Low price ones like lader guided hydra or glide bombs even with propulsion loitering tyoes. At the end its intel ops that prioritides chancrs of a decisive effect. And more just eye in the sky. Certain achievementd are by it
    1
  30. what game changer means have made the mal nourished state be so intimidating? arent these like somalian pirate threats? propatating fears for more consensus of security makes sense
    1
  31. exageration to bump oil /crypto /metals and funding maybe but not true escalations
    1
  32. A border watch tower? Big deal. If push comes to shove easy bombardement
    1
  33. its always easier with mass destructive means should there be the right consensus security wise.thats whats the game chamger and the bad scenario
    1
  34. WIth the man lovver costs idvsay not all far as its on par id say or not far. Ship building numbers and fighters prove alot
    1
  35.  @davidshakarisaz6364  wow ypur angry.try running.sweat some cheap drugs off .
    1
  36.  @davidshakarisaz6364  not cathinone like you.its called a typo
    1
  37. A good workout and sauna.redemevyourself.:))
    1
  38. all this will only make the profiteers richer and the mùasses more fearful and miserable.a truly dark war
    1
  39. Wow remote mind contfol ?
    1
  40. A suicide use of distruction.numbers can put in true destructive response with huge surface of kaunched grounds
    1
  41.  @MyRabbitHole  buddy tank s are your un8corns. Too much trust in old tanks. Follow the lucrativeness instead. Put together instead of coercive info hypes
    1
  42.  Let the flames takeover  low cost quads to loiter short distance and infrared cams with rf detections
    1
  43.  Let the flames takeover  radio frequency detection if possible like high end UAVS
    1
  44. How does a warship not detect incoming sub sonic antiship threats? CIWS off?
    1
  45. with upped surveillence and CIWS means likley gonna change the mae in defense with up comming fighter upgrades of the opponents.
    1
  46. No nukes even as the milutary is over supplied .
    1
  47. Still more deals and contracts need sealing.more manufacturing deals
    1
  48. Tight waters as well. Need to watchout to not bump into opponents subs looking also show guns. Theres no threat from a nation been sanctioned for 45 yrs .
    1
  49. Its real i tresting how so mu h fire power compared to 20 gmlrs of the ikrainian sides are less effective inbthe war
    1
  50. Its gonna turn uglier un priveledhed vs the priveledhed. Sectarian dystopian consensus? God forbid
    1