Comments by "AOK" (@aok4418) on "Scott Peterson Case 20 Years Later" video.
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
When and where did Scott transfer Laci's body from the truck to the boat in broad daylight? And why didn't a single witness see or hear him killing Laci or transporting her body anywhere?
-Why did any and all forensic testing come back negative for biological evidence of a dead body in any alleged crime scene?
They even tested the water in the boat, Negative results.
-Conner (baby) was determined to be alive until Jan 3rd by both the States expert and the Medical examiner? Furthermore, Dr Charles March testified there is no way that Scott and Laci Peterson's unborn baby could have died any earlier than Dec. 29, 2002. Dr Allison Galloway determined the baby could have even been alive as far along as Jan 14th. So how is he guilty if Laci was alive after the 24th?
-How did Conners body end above the water break and high tide line if he was in the ocean?
-How did his left ear get permanently flattened against his head and a rectangular piece of material was over it?
-Why was their no animal feeding on Conner whatsoever?
- How did plastic wrap get knotted around his neck that had to be cut off, not far from a plastic bag which was never tested? Dr. Cyril Wecht, who examined Conner's body but who did not testify, told Greta van Susteren that Conner's head measured 28 cm circumference and his neck measured 20 cm (On the Record, October 27, 2004). 28 cm = 11.02360 inches; 20 cm = 7.87400 inches. He confirmed the measurements in another interview with Fox News, and expressed his disbelief that the twine accidentally wrapped around Conner's neck. He also conjectured about the baby being in a bag.
-Why was Laci's uterus was at least 10 cm (3.9") smaller than it should have been? Certainly explains why the incision to remove Conner was not visible on her body, and the injured 9th rib, postmortem injury is in the same location where such an incision would have been made.
-Why did police ignore evidence, tips and sightings that points in a completely different direction?
Isn't it standard police practice to track down a missing person's last known whereabouts? It's not like they didn't have credible eyewitnesses that seen her walking on the 24th. Some called multiple times. Police ignored them. Sounds like tunnel vision and incompetence led to her death since the science proves she was alive after that day.
- Why was there no cadaver scent if Laci had been dead in the boat, warehouse, truck or home?
3
-
3
-
3
-
There was no forensic evidence, eyewitnesses, video surveillance etc ever proving the States theory. Even the SF Medical examiner (Boyd Stevens) explained to the lead detective that it would be highly unlikely that 32 lbs would submerge the body. It would just float. He also said the currents would likely take the body out to sea. She was found nearly 4 months later. How do currents flowing Southbound at 4 knots place either body where they were found.
-Conner (baby) was determined to be alive until Jan 3rd by both the States expert and the Medical examiner? Furthermore, Dr Charles March testified there is no way that Scott and Laci Peterson's unborn baby could have died any earlier than Dec. 29, 2002. Dr Allison Galloway determined the baby could have even been alive as far along as Jan 14th.
-Conner was found above the high tide line and water break.
-The baby's left ear was permanently flattened against the head and a rectangular piece of material was over his ear.
-Plastic wrap knotted around his neck that had to be cut off, not far from a plastic bag which was never tested.
-The criminologist and medical examiner, both concluded that the twine could not have wrapped around Conner’s neck accidentally. Dr. Cyril Wecht noted, "never in a million years."
-Laci had a missing neck that is not consistent with any known disarticulation in aqueous environments.
-Laci's uterus was at least 10 cm (3.9") smaller than it should have been, explaining why the incision to remove Conner was not visible on her body, and the injured 9th rib, postmortem injury is in the same location where such an incision would have been made.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
The area of the bay was extremely shallow. How did the uterus 'tear' open over time? If so, why was there no animal feeding or any sign Conner was ever in the bay? Should we really believe Conner would make it through the rocks and so far up on to shore. The supposed track was a hazardous journey. Yet the only damage (a 'tear') was supposed to have been made by the police trying to pick it up.
The cut or tear in the uterus makes 'coffin birth' impossible. The only ways in which a baby can be released from the mother is by birth or by C-section. Since testimony was offered that Laci didn't give birth to Conner, then we must assume that someone cut him from her living body.
27 days of searches before the bodies were even discovered.
December 28, 30; Jan 8, 9, 11, 18, 24, 28; Feb 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 20, 21, 23, 26; March 1, 2, 3, 4, 11, 12, 13, 26, 27, 29;
Are we expected to believe miles and miles of waterways and shoreline were patrolled by police. They didn't even cordon off anything during the search days. LOL
Conner could not have washed ashore from any direction under the conditions that existed on April 13. The water level produced by the 5.88 high tide simply did not produce a waterway to carry him to where he was found. And he was beyond the debris line, which means that he was not pushed back to where he was found by the breaking waves.
The SF Medical examine told the lead detective that it would be highly unlikely that 32 lbs would submerge the body. It would just float. He also said the currents would likely take the body out to sea. She was found nearly 4 months later. How do currents flowing Southbound at 4 knots place either body where they were found.
-Conner (baby) was found above the high tide line and water break.
-The baby's left ear was permanently flattened against the head, and a rectangular piece of material was over his ear.
Plastic wrap knotted around his neck that had to be cut off, not far from a plastic bag which was never tested. The criminologist and medical examiner, both concluded that the twine could not have wrapped around Conner’s neck accidentally. Dr. Cyril Wecht noted, "never in a million years."
Laci had a missing neck that is not consistent with any known disarticulation in aqueous environments.
Laci's uterus was at least 10 cm (3.9") smaller than it should have been, explaining why the incision to remove Conner was not visible on her body, and the injured 9th rib, postmortem injury is in the same location where such an
Dr Cheng said there was no explanation for Laci's body being found where it was.
There was no evidence in the truck.
There was no evidence in the boat.
There was no evidence in the home.
Cadaver dogs never found scent where Scott was - the only good scents led away from his locations.
The alleged weight used to submerge (32 lbs) Laci's body should have had the body return to the surface in a few days, yet it was never spotted.
Laci vanishes Dec 24th with a Croton watch the same day as the burglary across the street. A Croton watch was pawned just days later.
3
-
3
-
3
-
He didn't try and sell the house. He mentioned it.
WESTERN: Yes, I did. As I did every morning. I was either the first one or one of the first that had arrived. And, Scott was there that morning, and he was visibly upset. So I sat down next to him while he was going through the e-mails on the computer. And I said, "Scott," you know, "Are you okay?" And he said no. He goes, "I need to talk to you about selling the house. I can't have Laci come back here."
DISTASO: And what did you respond to him, if anything?
WESTERN: I responded with, "Well, Scott, I understand. However, now is not the time nor the place to discuss this."
DISTASO: And did he mention that to you again about selling the house?
WESTERN: No, he did not.
3
-
Was not fleeing to Mexico.
You think he was fleeing to Mexico with his brothers ID in the bright red Mercedes without cashing his pay, checks, after filing his tax returns, with books for his neices and nephews in the car for the Easter Sunday the following week.
He was already living with family and friends in Southern California due to the media presence at his house.
His brothers ID gives him the green fee discount just like his father confirmed.
Police were already aware that Scott was in southern California, and there is no testimony that he ever attempted to run off to Mexico.
His father had planned for the four of them to get together that day to play golf. There was no attempt to evade police. Officers Quick and Limon testified that as soon as they put up their sirens, He immediately pulled over. Since when is getting pulled over at Torrey Pines in San Diego equate to fleeing to Mexico?
Pwc
"On April 13th, the body of a baby was found on the Richmond shoreline. On April 14th, the remains of a woman were found on the shore at East Bay Regional Park. There was widespread speculation that these were the bodies of Laci and Conner. The media presence at our homes in San Diego returned. At any given time, at least six media vans and satellite trucks were camped out at Scott's parent's house and at least three vans were at his brother Joe's house. Each arrival and departure was met with constant questions regarding Scott's whereabouts and the identity of the bodies.
During that week, Scott had stayed with friends in San Diego, and with his sister, Susan, and her family in the Escondido area (also in San Diego County). On Wednesday, April 16th, Scott wrote down one partial and three complete license numbers of vehicles that were following him. Based on the media presence at our homes, Scott believed them to be private investigators hired by the media and indicated so in a fax to his attorney, Kirk McAllister. This fax was entered as exhibit D6W-5."
3
-
What about the " The fishing trip receipt ". I'm assuming you are referring to the MARINA PARKING TICKET
EVERS: I asked, I had a just a quick conversation with Scott about where he went fishing today. He said Berkeley Marina.
DISTASO: Okay.
EVERS: And he said, in fact, I have a parking receipt, would you like to see it?
DISTASO: And what did you say?
EVERS: I said yes.
DISTASO: Okay. And did he go somewhere and get a parking receipt for you?
EVERS: Yes, he did.
DISTASO: Do you know where he went?
EVERS: Yes, I do.
DISTASO: Where was that?
EVERS: He opened up the, he opened up the door to his truck, and reached in, and pulled a receipt from the ashtray.
DISTASO: Okay. Let me show you what's been marked as People's 53. Do you recognize that item?
EVERS: Yes, I do.
DISTASO: And does it say on there what time the person, whoever got this receipt, bought the receipt?
GERAGOS: Objection. Document speaks for itself.
JUDGE: Well, he can read it off of there as well.
DISTASO: Is it on there?
EVERS: Yes.
DISTASO: Go ahead and read it.
EVERS: 12:54 p.m. December 24th.
DISTASO: And does it say when that parking receipt expires?
EVERS: Yes.
3
-
3
-
3
-
@mselizabeth2644 The area of the bay was extremely shallow. How did the uterus 'tear' open over time? If so, why was there no animal feeding or any sign Conner was ever in the bay? Should we really believe Conner would make it through the rocks and so far up on to shore. The supposed track was a hazardous journey. Yet the only damage (a 'tear') was supposed to have been made by the police trying to pick it up.
The cut or tear in the uterus makes 'coffin birth' impossible. The only ways in which a baby can be released from the mother is by birth or by C-section. Since testimony was offered that Laci didn't give birth to Conner, then we must assume that someone cut him from her living body.
27 days of searches before the bodies were even discovered.
December 28, 30; Jan 8, 9, 11, 18, 24, 28; Feb 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 20, 21, 23, 26; March 1, 2, 3, 4, 11, 12, 13, 26, 27, 29;
Are we expected to believe miles and miles of waterways and shoreline were patrolled by police. They didn't even cordon off anything during the search days. LOL
Conner could not have washed ashore from any direction under the conditions that existed on April 13. The water level produced by the 5.88 high tide simply did not produce a waterway to carry him to where he was found. And he was beyond the debris line, which means that he was not pushed back to where he was found by the breaking waves.
The SF Medical examine told the lead detective that it would be highly unlikely that 32 lbs would submerge the body. It would just float. He also said the currents would likely take the body out to sea. She was found nearly 4 months later. How do currents flowing Southbound at 4 knots place either body where they were found.
-Conner (baby) was found above the high tide line and water break.
-The baby's left ear was permanently flattened against the head, and a rectangular piece of material was over his ear.
Plastic wrap knotted around his neck that had to be cut off, not far from a plastic bag which was never tested. The criminologist and medical examiner, both concluded that the twine could not have wrapped around Conner’s neck accidentally. Dr. Cyril Wecht noted, "never in a million years."
Laci had a missing neck that is not consistent with any known disarticulation in aqueous environments.
Laci's uterus was at least 10 cm (3.9") smaller than it should have been, explaining why the incision to remove Conner was not visible on her body, and the injured 9th rib, postmortem injury is in the same location where such an
Dr Cheng said there was no explanation for Laci's body being found where it was.
There was no evidence in the truck.
There was no evidence in the boat.
There was no evidence in the home.
Cadaver dogs never found scent where Scott was - the only good scents led away from his locations.
The alleged weight used to submerge (32 lbs) Laci's body should have had the body return to the surface in a few days, yet it was never spotted.
Laci vanishes Dec 24th with a Croton watch the same day as the burglary across the street. A Croton watch was pawned just days later.
3
-
Medical examiner currents
GERAGOS: Okay. Now, when you talked to Boyd Stephens, he also told you and he was the San Francisco, or still is the San Francisco Medical Examiner. He told you that in cases previously where bodies have bloated with decomposition, that they pulled as much as eighty pounds of weight up with the body surfacing in the Bay, correct?
GROGAN: Yes.
GERAGOS: Okay. And, once again, you gave him, and this would have been on April 2nd, of 2003. You gave him the hypothetical of the chicken wire, right?
GROGAN: Yes, sir.
GERAGOS: Okay. And he told you that the water flow southbound was at four knots, right?
GROGAN: In one particular area we were talking about, yes.
GERAGOS: Okay. And he also said that, in his opinion, thirty pound of weights would not likely be enough to cause a female of that weight, especially wrapped in plastic causing additional buoyancy in the plastic to immediately go to the bottom, correct?
GROGAN: Yes, that's one of the things he said.
GERAGOS: And he said victim would likely have traveled with the currents for a considerable distance before any exposed weights could catch something on the bottom, or the current would allow the object to stay in one place long enough for the weights to begin to sink in the mud.
GROGAN: Yes. When talking about the Richmond Turning Basin area, there.
GERAGOS: If it had made it to deeper waters, it's possible the body would still be in pristine condition, right?
GROGAN: Yes, sir.
3
-
@tommoyer4697
Hair in the boat
MTDNA IS NOT A UNIQUE IDENTIFIER AND ANY COMPARISON IS NOT DEFINITIVE.
YOSHIDA: I look at the tool itself, looking to see how new it is. Then typically I make some test marks to see how the things that are cut with this tool will look, after they're cut with the tool. Then I will also examine the item that was cut and look at the edges. First of all, was it really cut. Sometimes I get things that are not cut. And then looking to see if this is a possibility that this tool that I have cut it to begin with.
David Harris, in his direct examination of Sarah Yoshida, makes it quite clear that, "regardless of whether these were recently rusted or had been rusted over two months," the pliers were not used to cut the chicken wire that was found in the bed of Scott's pickup.
Claim,
The murder took place the night of the 23rd, and that he removed her body from the house to the pickup for transport to the warehouse on the morning of the 24th. Given the timeline they provided during the trial, Laci would have been dead from 8-12 hours before he removed her body from the house. And yet the cadaver dog on the 27th did not detect a cadaver scent in the house, in the pickup, on the tarp/boat cover that Scott supposedly used to wrap Laci, nor the market umbrellas that he supposedly used to weigh the tarp down, nor the boat that he supposedly used to dump her in the Bay. By the time he had ended the dastardly deed, Laci was already dead for some 16 hours.
No evidence of the crime in the home or the pickup or the boat. No cadaver scent in the home or the pickup or the boat. No witnesses that saw Scott Peterson commit any part of this crime. No evidence that Laci was ever where they said Scott put her. No evidence that Laci and Conner were ever in the same place in the Bay.
HENDEE
GERAGOS: Okay. And he told you specifically, "Which might very well be consistent with being pinched in the nose of the pliers"?
HENDEE: No, he didn't say that. That's my writing in my report.
GERAGOS: So you were speculating, then?
HENDEE: Yes.
GERAGOS: Okay. And you were speculating that the hair, if it had a crushed ends, that that would have come from the tip of the pliers, right?
HENDEE: Possibly.
GERAGOS: Okay. Now, the -- he advised you that at least one of the hairs had some substance on it; is that correct?
HENDEE: Yes.
FISHER
-----GERAGOS: Because Sharon has got these numbers that line up here, with the exception of the - what you said the C11TC6, which is not over here?
FISHER: Uh-huh.
GERAGOS: So this -- the hair from the pliers shares basically everything but the one marker there, comes from the HVII region, that you can't exclude it, right?
FISHER: That's correct.
GERAGOS: But you can't get do a point -- you cannot say that matches; is that correct?
FISHER: That's correct. Mitochondrial DNA cannot do that.
GERAGOS: It does not match the hairs?
FISHER: On a match of Mitochondrial DNA means the sequences are the same. Does not mean the same thing as a Nuclear DNA match.
GERAGOS: So that's the significant difference, if you will, between Nuclear DNA and Mitochondrial DNA. Nuclear DNA -- I know you are not qualified -- but at least at the basic level, Nuclear DNA, you are able to say, look, if it's one in eight billion, that looks like a match, right?
FISHER: Match is where the markers they get are the same. The statistics, the one in eight billion, has to do with the statistics, not whether it's a match.
GERAGOS: Okay. And you can't do that with Mitochondrial DNA?
FISHER: We cannot get to the eight billion number with the Mitochondrial.
GERAGOS: This database that we have got of 5,000 people that Mr. Harris was talking about, that's -- basically 1800 of those people are Caucasians, right?
FISHER: Correct.
GERAGOS: Okay. And out of those 1800, how many are put in by the FBI?
FISHER: Caucasians?
GERAGOS: Caucasians. If I understand correctly, you have got 5,000, and that's contributed by, what, five or six different sources?
FISHER: Probably around eight.
GERAGOS: But out of those eight sources, the FBI is one, right?
FISHER: Yes.
GERAGOS: So when you do a test, for instance, this test at some point this will be entered into the database, correct?
FISHER: No. This -- the sequence will not be entered into the database.
GERAGOS: Is that because you don't have permission?
FISHER: No. It's because we do not enter casework samples into the database.
GERAGOS: Okay. So other samples that you have, you will enter into the database?
FISHER: Samples that were obtained for population purposes are entered into the database.
GERAGOS: Paternity testing, things like that?
FISHER: That's a lot of -- sometimes that's where the samples come from, yes.
GERAGOS: Most of these database is mostly results that are obtained as a result of a paternity test?
FISHER: No. They are samples that are obtained by paternity testing laboratories, or blood Banks, or sometimes people just donate samples for the population testing. So they are not from somebody else's case work. They are actually for the database.
GERAGOS: Somebody has got to do the case work in order to get a sequence, don't they?
FISHER: It's not -- I'm sorry, it's semantics. We're not -- it's different. It's processed for the database, not for a forensic case.
GERAGOS: I understand that. But somebody still has to do the work to get your sequence, right?
FISHER: That's correct.
GERAGOS: You don't have a sequence to match up against just -- if somebody gets a blood sample, you don't know what your sequence is until you do the work, right?
FISHER: That's correct.
GERAGOS: Once you do the work, you get a sequence that goes into the database?
FISHER: That's correct.
GERAGOS: When you run -- you get a sequence here, like you have got, you have entered that into the database, right?
FISHER: Not this particular sequence. But, yes, this sequence gets entered into the database.
GERAGOS: You will get a result that says one out of 112?
FISHER: Yes.
GERAGOS: Does that mean that if you tested -- you would expect that if you tested anybody who was related to Sharon Rocha, maternally, along her mother's side, that you would expect to see this same sequence?
FISHER: Yes. The one out of 112 would be for unrelated individuals. So --
GERAGOS: So it would be one out of one -- or one out of -- five out of fifty if they are related?
FISHER: If they are all maternally-related individuals, would be expected to have the same DNA sequence. So, yes, all of the maternal relatives would be the same.
GERAGOS: Okay. But there is no way to distinguish whether it's -- as you sit here today, given the current state of the science, we can't distinguish with any kind of specificity what you would call a match for Nuclear DNA purposes.
FISHER: I'm sorry, I don't understand that question.
GERAGOS: You can't -- all you can do -- this is more a test of exclusion; is that correct?
FISHER: That's correct, yes.
GERAGOS: So we can exclude Scott Peterson. We know it's not his hair?
FISHER: That's correct.
GERAGOS: We can't -- we can't say that this is Laci Peterson's hair?
FISHER: No, we cannot.
3
-
@rustyscrib6071 The bay area wasn't cordoned off. People could come and go when they pleased. There are only 27 days of searches before the bodies were even discovered. Are you suggesting nobody could have placed a body in tgat area outside of these dates or after daylight hours on the dates? 🤦♂️
December 28, 30; Jan 8, 9, 11, 18, 24, 28; Feb 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 20, 21, 23, 26; March 1, 2, 3, 4, 11, 12, 13, 26, 27, 29;
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
The MPD screwed him and let real killers walk.
AMERICAS MOST WANTED TIP.
Four days after Steven Todd and Glenn Pearce were arrested, America’s Most Wanted ran a story on Laci’s disappearance. An anonymous call came into their hotline. We refer to it as the AMW tip.
The caller said he had a conversation with two men who were bragging about Laci’s murder. The second man was unnamed, but the tipster gave a description and knew where the second individual lived.
It was reported that the first man said “when they did it they thought it was going to be just another murder case . . . now it’s a big case all over TV and news . . . and they are blaming the husband and they are not getting any attention.” went on to say how stupid everyone was.
The caller went on to say that he knew where the first man lived with his mother; his mother has the same last name. The last name is worth mentioning because four days earlier, the Modesto Police had encountered the Mother. She was present at her neighbor’s home when police came looking for the Medina’s stolen property. There was a strong connection between the Doe family and burglar Steven Todd. Certainly, this would merit follow-up, especially since the AMW operator stated this caller was 100% sure.
Unfortunately, the extent of their follow up was this:
This tip was given to a Modesto police officer, the same officer that encountered the mother four days earlier. This officer drove to the sons house, which was one block away from where he had encountered the mother, four days earlier. The son was standing outside. The officer confirmed his identity and asked where he was on December 24th.
He said he was “locked up.” The officer called the jail and a deputy confirmed that John Doe had been in jail on the 24th, so the officer did not ask any other questions.
The tip did not say he had murdered Laci, the tip just said “they did it.” It is not clear at all who “they” are. However, the officer asked no more questions. The officer never asked why it would be reported that he was bragging about the murder of Laci Peterson; whether he knew anything about Laci’s whereabouts; or about his mother’s connection to the Medina burglary.
It was recently verified the first man WAS NOT IN JAIL during December of 2002. The deputy that had confirmed he was in jail had used an intake document that only estimates an inmate’s jail stay, it was not updated once he was released.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@sophie8394
You lied along with your friend Patty who you love to parrot.
1- "I cut it handing out flyers"
2- "I Cut bc I'm an outdoorsman"
3- "I cut it on my toolbox"
4- "I cut bc I work on farm equipment"
Here is the truth
GERAGOS: And then at that point, did you take full body photographs of Scott?
LOVELL: Yes, I did.
GERAGOS: When you a took full body photographs, what was he wearing?
LOVELL: He was asked to strip down to his shorts and just take overall pictures of his hands, the front of his body, back of his body, legs, feet.
GERAGOS: Okay. Do you have those photographs with you?
LOVELL: No, I don't.
GERAGOS: Do you know where those are?
LOVELL: Not specifically, no.
GERAGOS: Do you know -- or did you notice any scratches, or marks, or anything on his body when you took these photographs?
LOVELL: No, I didn't.
GERAGOS: That's specifically what you were looking for; isn't that correct?
LOVELL: I believe that was the purpose of the photographs, yes.
---Phone call with Grogan.
PETERSON: No, never been in an accident. Might find blood climbing in it but—
GROGAN: You know what that was from?
PETERSON: well I mean I—cut my hands every day.
GROGAN: Okay. Ah
PETERSON: _ I cut my hand that day.
GROGAN: You cut your hand that day?
PETERSON: Yeah.
GROGAN: How’d that happen?
PETERSON: Um reached in that side ah pocket in the door?
GROGAN: What cut ya?
PETERSON: I mean I know Allen looked at my hands and I know he noticed cuts on my hands so—he knows.
GROGAN: Okay. What ah—ah I didn’t notice any there that night but—did ah—what was in there that cut ya?
PETERSON: I don’t know what it was, it was probably just the ah door or the pocket or somethin’. _ knuckle. Still my hand I—you know—I keep cuttin’ it handlin’ out flyers so—that’s the reasons I—keep rememberin’ it.
GROGAN: So you just had like a scuff n your knuckle or something?
PETERSON: Yeah, yeah. Still here.
GROGAN: Alright. So that would be your—which—which hand?
PETERSON: Ah left hand, index finger—
GROGAN: Okay. Well that can explain some of that ah—um about ah Laci, she ever been injured in there?
PETERSON: I don’t think so.
---Gloria Gomez interview
Peterson: Well look at my hands, you can see you know. Cuts on my knuckles, numerous scars. I, I work on farms. I work with machinery. Um I know I, cut my knuckle that day.
Gomez: On what day?
Peterson: On Christmas Eve.
Gomez: Doing what?
Peterson: Um, reaching in to the toolbox of my truck and then into, uh the pocket of the door. I cut open my knuckle and there's a bloodstain on the door. On the divers side door.
--- Interview Diane Sawyer
Peterson: These were vehicles that both of us were in on a continuous basis. Uhm.. I know for a fact there'll be plenty blood in there from me. You know I, I work on farms, and you look at my hands now and they have cuts all over them.
Sawyer: They do?
Peterson: Oh certainly. You can look at my knuckles are always cut on me.
Sawyer: Been scraped any way.
Pererson: Oh certainly.
----Sandy Rickard
Sandy R didn't testify that Scott said anything about the cut on his hand, genius!
RICKARD: Patty and Lynn were in the house. Sharon and I were sitting at the table. I was unaware of Patty making that phone call at that time. Sharon went in the other room to call the detective. When she was through talking to him she handed me the phone.
HARRIS: And when she handed you the phone you told Detective Grogan this story that your recollection of the 24th about Scott Peterson coming up making the blood comment?
RICKARD: Correct.
HARRIS: Okay. And this was, you know for a fact that Sharon Rocha was on phone prior to your talking to Detective Grogan?
RICKARD: Yes.
HARRIS: Okay. And, in fact, what you told him at that time is you know if they find blood anywhere, that doesn't mean anything. You didn't mention anything at that point about Scott saying they found blood in the truck?
RICKARD: I didn't say "in the truck."
HARRIS: No, you didn't, did you?
RICKARD: No, I don't remember saying "in the truck," I remember saying "on the truck."
HARRIS: You testified today, you're testifying, is your testimony today that the blood was on the truck, is what you remember or in the truck?
RICKARD: I believe Scott was mentioning about the door knob, the handle, that that area of the truck. He didn't say "inside the truck," he said "on the truck."
HARRIS: Okay. So that night Scott was discussing the truck, he was coming up to you discussing the truck and what possible blood on the truck?
RICKARD: Correct.
HARRIS: And what you told the police officer, you mentioned the word "truck," did you?
RICKARD: To my recollection what I told the police officer was what I had testified to.
HARRIS: If I can have you take a look, I'm showing her Detective Grogan's report dated January 28th. If you look at the section that's in yellow.
JUDGE: Just read it to yourself.
RICKARD: Okay.
HARRIS: Just that paragraph right here.
RICKARD: Here?
HARRIS: Hm-hmm.
RICKARD: Okay, I didn't, apparently, I didn't say "truck," but that's,
HARRIS: Apparently you never?
RICKARD: That's what I thought I had told him.
HARRIS: So you never mentioned "truck" at all; is that correct?
RICKARD: I thought I did.
3
-
3
-
@sophie8394 I already did.
I'll explain it again.
Laci's December 23 appointment, however, her uterus measured 33 cm., as shown by the fundal height.
PETERSON: Well, again, the baby's head is normally down in the pelvis. It's actually right above. And then when the woman is ready to go into labor, the head will settle, depending on the size of the baby, how far up it goes.
GERAGOS: Okay. And the, flesh for lack of a better term, there just was nothing in this area here; is that correct?
PETERSON: Well, be up to, if we assume that about right here where I'm pointing is where the belly button would be. Above there, no flesh.
PETERSON: Sure. The uterus, in the first place, from the lowest portion of the uterus where it connects to the vagina, to the uppermost portion, the fundus, measured 23 centimeters.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@ReneeFabulous-wt9ty
Here are exact quotes of yours that are completely False.
-You
"That's a bunch of BS. Full term healthy babies weigh between 6-9 lbs. Conner only weighed about three lbs."
-TRUTH
They measure bones to determine gestational age. They don't use weight of a decomposing fetus to determine age. 🤦♂️
-YOU
"The bodies washing ashore right where Scott said he was fishing on the day Scott said he was fishing on the day Laci went missing is, physical evidence"
TRUTH
That is NOT physical evidence.
-YOU
"Even though Ron already had a boat and a better one at that.... LOL"
TRUTH
Ron didn't have a boat. He had a dinghy.
-YOU
"Are you aware the boat was never registered"
TRUTH
The boat WAS registered. The correct information including his name and address was filed with the DMV on 12-9-02.
-YOU
"Laci's hair was found wound tightly in some pliers on the boat"
TRUTH
HAIR WAS NOT WRAPPED AROUND PLIERS
HENDEE: No, it didn't wrap around the pliers, didn't wrap around the needle nose. It just went through. It looked like at one location it just went through the pliers, and It was never proven to be Laci's hair.
-YOU
-Scott transferred the marina ticket to his clean.pants
TRUTH
EVERS: And he said, in fact, I have a parking receipt, would you like to see it?
DISTASO: And what did you say?
EVERS: I said yes.
DISTASO: Okay. And did he go somewhere and get a parking receipt for you?
EVERS: Yes, he did.
DISTASO: Do you know where he went?
EVERS: Yes, I do.
DISTASO: Where was that?
EVERS: He opened up the, he opened up the door to his truck, and reached in, and pulled a receipt from the ashtray.
-YOU
"Scott told Ron he was golfing"
TRUTH
Scott did NOT tell Ron he was golfing. He didn't talk to Ron until later and when he did, he said he was fishing.
-YOU
"Scott called Sharon and immediately said Laci is missing without asking if she had heard from her or seen her"
TRUTH
DISTASO: And can you tell the jury, just tell us what happened.
ROCHA: When he called he said, "Hi,
Mom." He said, "Is Laci there with you or over there?" And I said, "No." And he said that her car is there, was there in the driveway and the dog was in the backward with the leash on and Laci was missing. I remember telling him to call her friends to see if anybody had seen or talked to her that day.....
-YOU
"Robert Chacon was a lead detective who found evidence in the form of clay pots."
TRUTH
Robert Chacon was not a lead detective, nor was there any evidence of clay pots ever entered as evidence. Robert Chacon was an FBI and no was not in charge of any of the bay searches either.
-YOU
"That's a bunch of BS. Full term healthy babies weigh between 6-9 lbs. Conner only weighed about three lbs."
TRUTH
They measure bones to determine gestational age. They don't use weight of a decomposing fetus to determine age. 🤦♂️
-YOU
"Vivian Mitchell couldn't have seen Laci because her husband Bill was home watching Football and therecwas no football games that day."
TRUTH
He said he had been searching on Christmas Eve for information or previews of bowl games to be played in the next few days.
You must have had to jump through some "mind gymnastics" I guess.
-YOU
"Scott was researching paths of currents"
TRUTH
-He was searching fishing game and boating regulations. Detective Wall clearly agreed on the stand he DID NOT search " currents" The website was "Department of Fish and Game"
-YOU
.."they have Laci walking all over the neighborhood in nothing but a long sleeve blouse"
TRUTH
It wasn't a long sleeve blouse.
SHARON ROCHA: And what was she wearing when you left?
PETERSON: Ah she had on her black pants – and like a white top with long sleeves.
SHARON ROCHA: A pullover or button or what?
PETERSON: Yeah. Pullover like ah—you know tee shirt kinda sweater kinda thing.
2
-
When and where did Scott transfer Laci's body from the truck to the boat in broad daylight? And why didn't a single witness see or hear him killing Laci or transporting her body anywhere?
-Why did any and all forensic testing come back negative for biological evidence of a dead body in any alleged crime scene?
They even tested the water in the boat, Negative results.
-Conner (baby) was determined to be alive until Jan 3rd by both the States expert and the Medical examiner? Furthermore, Dr Charles March testified there is no way that Scott and Laci Peterson's unborn baby could have died any earlier than Dec. 29, 2002. Dr Allison Galloway determined the baby could have even been alive as far along as Jan 14th. So how is he guilty if Laci was alive after the 24th?
-How did Conners body end above the water break and high tide line if he was in the ocean?
-How did his left ear get permanently flattened against his head and a rectangular piece of material was over it?
-Why was their no animal feeding on Conner whatsoever?
- How did plastic wrap get knotted around his neck that had to be cut off, not far from a plastic bag which was never tested? Dr. Cyril Wecht, who examined Conner's body but who did not testify, told Greta van Susteren that Conner's head measured 28 cm circumference and his neck measured 20 cm (On the Record, October 27, 2004). 28 cm = 11.02360 inches; 20 cm = 7.87400 inches. He confirmed the measurements in another interview with Fox News, and expressed his disbelief that the twine accidentally wrapped around Conner's neck. He also conjectured about the baby being in a bag.
-Why was Laci's uterus was at least 10 cm (3.9") smaller than it should have been? Certainly explains why the incision to remove Conner was not visible on her body, and the injured 9th rib, postmortem injury is in the same location where such an incision would have been made.
-Why did police ignore evidence, tips and sightings that points in a completely different direction?
Isn't it standard police practice to track down a missing person's last known whereabouts? It's not like they didn't have credible eyewitnesses that seen her walking on the 24th. Some called multiple times. Police ignored them. Sounds like tunnel vision and incompetence led to her death since the science proves she was alive after that day.
- Why was there no cadaver scent if Laci had been dead in the boat, warehouse, truck or home?
2
-
@deepblack2193
When and where did Scott transfer Laci's body from the truck to the boat in broad daylight? And why didn't a single witness see or hear him killing Laci or transporting her body anywhere?
-Why did any and all forensic testing come back negative for biological evidence of a dead body in any alleged crime scene?
They even tested the water in the boat, Negative results.
-Conner (baby) was determined to be alive until Jan 3rd by both the States expert and the Medical examiner? Furthermore, Dr Charles March testified there is no way that Scott and Laci Peterson's unborn baby could have died any earlier than Dec. 29, 2002. Dr Allison Galloway determined the baby could have even been alive as far along as Jan 14th. So how is he guilty if Laci was alive after the 24th?
-How did Conners body end above the water break and high tide line if he was in the ocean?
-How did his left ear get permanently flattened against his head and a rectangular piece of material was over it?
-Why was their no animal feeding on Conner whatsoever?
- How did plastic wrap get knotted around his neck that had to be cut off, not far from a plastic bag which was never tested? Dr. Cyril Wecht, who examined Conner's body but who did not testify, told Greta van Susteren that Conner's head measured 28 cm circumference and his neck measured 20 cm (On the Record, October 27, 2004). 28 cm = 11.02360 inches; 20 cm = 7.87400 inches. He confirmed the measurements in another interview with Fox News, and expressed his disbelief that the twine accidentally wrapped around Conner's neck. He also conjectured about the baby being in a bag.
-Why was Laci's uterus was at least 10 cm (3.9") smaller than it should have been? Certainly explains why the incision to remove Conner was not visible on her body, and the injured 9th rib, postmortem injury is in the same location where such an incision would have been made.
-Why did police ignore evidence, tips and sightings that points in a completely different direction?
Isn't it standard police practice to track down a missing person's last known whereabouts? It's not like they didn't have credible eyewitnesses that seen her walking on the 24th. Some called multiple times. Police ignored them. Sounds like tunnel vision and incompetence led to her death since the science proves she was alive after that day.
- Why was there no cadaver scent if Laci had been dead in the boat, warehouse, truck or home?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@sophie8394
You said "Mark Geragos is a highly skilled attorney. He didn't use the Aponte tip bc he knew it was bogus. Multi level hearsay. "
Tell me, how could Geragos use the Aponte tip during trial if the defense wasn't aware of it, genius? Grogan only refers to the notation for January 22, 2003 where Aponte was asked to verify. It only includes Aponte’s phone number, where he worked, the names of the Shawn and Adam Tenbrink. It did NOT mention Steven Todd or Laci. You would know that if you bothered to research this instead posting this.
To quote you
" Mark Geragos is a highly skilled attorney. He didn't use the Aponte tip bc he knew it was bogus. Multi level hearsay. "
QUOTE
" there's nothing I haven't reviewed.
I've been reviewing it for more than 10 years. I'm not impressed by YouTube legal experts.
And for the 2nd time. RN did NOT co author a book. The fact you don't even know that tells me everything I need to know about your expertise. "
FACT
RN did co author a book called
'we, the jury'
QUOTE
("Are you aware the boat was never registered")
FACT
The boat WAS registered. The correct information including his name and address was filed with the DMV on 12-9-02.
QUOTE
("Even though Ron already had a boat and a better one at that.... LOL")
FACT
Ron didn't have a boat. He had a float tube.
QUOTE
(...you don't have an explanation for why SP refused to even speak to John Walsh...")
FACT
He did speak to John walsh. Get your facts straight, stalker!
John Walsh: "I talked to Scott on the phone for about 45 minutes and his parents for about an hour," Walsh said in the lobby of the DoubleTree Hotel. "
-You said Scott did not have an anchor rope, FALSE. I even gave you the exhibit number.
QUOTE
"None if the so called witnesses knew Laci."
TRUTH
Martha Aguilar:
Around 10 a.m. on the morning of December 24, Aguilar saw Laci and McK walking on La Loma Avenue in the same general area that Freitas saw her. She was sure it was Laci. Aguilar lived 2 blocks south of Laci on Covena and they went to the same doctor.
Aguilar’s call to the MPD tipline was never returned. She was never interviewed by anyone from MPD or from the DA’s office.
QUOTE
"They also claim to have seen her in an area where she was never known to walk."
TRUTH
Grogan indicates that sightings outside of the park were discounted because Laci was planning to walk in the park. This is blatantly false and Grogan knew it. Grogan had been present on December 26 when Chris Boyer interviewed Scott Peterson at his home. Scott clearly stated that Laci sometimes walked in the neighborhood. He told Boyer, in Grogan’s presence that Laci had walked on Sunday, December 22, in the neighborhood.
-Tabitha K and Patty S both insist Jackie must have been lying because she would have had to fill out a CTR form to withdraw the $10,000. Anyone can look it up and see that a CTR form is not filed for a single transaction of $10,000.
"Federal law requires financial institutions to report currency (cash or coin) transactions OVER $10,000 conducted by, or on behalf of, one person, as well as multiple currency transactions that aggregate to be OVER $10,000 in a single day. These transactions are reported on Currency Transaction Reports (CTRs)."
2
-
2
-
1
-
@ReneeFabulous-wt9ty
Why don't you answer these, ReneenayFabNayNay?
When and where did Scott transfer Laci's body from the truck to the boat in broad daylight? And why didn't a single witness see or hear him killing Laci or transporting her body anywhere?
-Why did any and all forensic testing come back negative for biological evidence of a dead body in any alleged crime scene?
They even tested the water in the boat, Negative results.
-Conner (baby) was determined to be alive until Jan 3rd by both the States expert and the Medical examiner? Furthermore, Dr Charles March testified there is no way that Scott and Laci Peterson's unborn baby could have died any earlier than Dec. 29, 2002. Dr Allison Galloway determined the baby could have even been alive as far along as Jan 14th. So how is he guilty if Laci was alive after the 24th?
-How did Conners body end above the water break and high tide line if he was in the ocean?
-How did his left ear get permanently flattened against his head and a rectangular piece of material was over it?
-Why was their no animal feeding on Conner whatsoever?
- How did plastic wrap get knotted around his neck that had to be cut off, not far from a plastic bag which was never tested? Dr. Cyril Wecht, who examined Conner's body but who did not testify, told Greta van Susteren that Conner's head measured 28 cm circumference and his neck measured 20 cm (On the Record, October 27, 2004). 28 cm = 11.02360 inches; 20 cm = 7.87400 inches. He confirmed the measurements in another interview with Fox News, and expressed his disbelief that the twine accidentally wrapped around Conner's neck. He also conjectured about the baby being in a bag.
-Why was Laci's uterus was at least 10 cm (3.9") smaller than it should have been? Certainly explains why the incision to remove Conner was not visible on her body, and the injured 9th rib, postmortem injury is in the same location where such an incision would have been made.
-Why did police ignore evidence, tips and sightings that points in a completely different direction?
Isn't it standard police practice to track down a missing person's last known whereabouts? It's not like they didn't have credible eyewitnesses that seen her walking on the 24th. Some called multiple times. Police ignored them. Sounds like tunnel vision and incompetence led to her death since the science proves she was alive after that day.
- Why was there no cadaver scent if Laci had been dead in the boat, warehouse, truck or home?
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ReneeFabulous-wt9ty Appears the Peterson's have their facts straight. You, on the hand.
You said Dr Peterson testified "Conner was not born alive", which is false has nothing to do with GA, but okay. I'll post here for you again.
GERAGOS: Okay. Now, did you also tell Detective Grogan you could not say for certain whether the child had been stillborn?
PETERSON: Again, same thing I've been saying, and I said in my report.
GERAGOS: Okay. And that you also could not tell for certain whether or not the child had gone through the birthing process?
PETERSON: Correct. Same thing.
Here are exact quotes of yours that are completely False.
-YOU
"The bodies washing ashore right where Scott said he was fishing on the day Scott said he was fishing on the day Laci went missing is, physical evidence"
TRUTH
That is NOT physical evidence.
-YOU
"Even though Ron already had a boat and a better one at that.... LOL"
TRUTH
Ron didn't have a boat. He had a dinghy.
-YOU
"Are you aware the boat was never registered"
TRUTH
The boat WAS registered. The correct information including his name and address was filed with the DMV on 12-9-02.
-YOU
"Laci's hair was found wound tightly in some pliers on the boat"
TRUTH
HAIR WAS NOT WRAPPED AROUND PLIERS
HENDEE: No, it didn't wrap around the pliers, didn't wrap around the needle nose. It just went through. It looked like at one location it just went through the pliers.
It was never proven to be Laci's hair.
-YOU
-Scott transferred the marina ticket to his clean.pants
TRUTH
EVERS: And he said, in fact, I have a parking receipt, would you like to see it?
DISTASO: And what did you say?
EVERS: I said yes.
DISTASO: Okay. And did he go somewhere and get a parking receipt for you?
EVERS: Yes, he did.
DISTASO: Do you know where he went?
EVERS: Yes, I do.
DISTASO: Where was that?
EVERS: He opened up the, he opened up the door to his truck, and reached in, and pulled a receipt from the ashtray.
-YOU
"Scott told Ron he was golfing"
TRUTH
Scott did NOT tell Ron he was golfing. He didn't talk to Ron until later and when he did, he said he was fishing.
-YOU
"Scott called Sharon and immediately said Laci is missing without asking if she had heard from her or seen her"
TRUTH
DISTASO: And can you tell the jury, just tell us what happened.
ROCHA: When he called he said, "Hi,
Mom." He said, "Is Laci there with you or over there?" And I said, "No." And he said that her car is there, was there in the driveway and the dog was in the backward with the leash on and Laci was missing. I remember telling him to call her friends to see if anybody had seen or talked to her that day.....
-YOU
"Robert Chacon was a lead detective who found evidence in the form of clay pots."
TRUTH
Robert Chacon was not a lead detective, nor was there any evidence of clay pots ever entered as evidence. Robert Chacon was an FBI and no was not in charge of any of the bay searches either.
-YOU
"That's a bunch of BS. Full term healthy babies weigh between 6-9 lbs. Conner only weighed about three lbs."
TRUTH
They measure bones to determine gestational age. They don't use weight of a decomposing fetus to determine age. 🤦♂️
-YOU
"Vivian Mitchell couldn't have seen Laci because her husband Bill was home watching Football and therecwas no football games that day."
TRUTH
He said he had been searching on Christmas Eve for information or previews of bowl games to be played in the next few days.
You must have had to jump through some "mind gymnastics" I guess.
-YOU
"Scott was researching paths of currents"
TRUTH
-He was searching fishing game and boating regulations. Detective Wall clearly agreed on the stand he DID NOT search " currents" The website was "Department of Fish and Game"
-YOU
.."they have Laci walking all over the neighborhood in nothing but a long sleeve blouse"
TRUTH
It wasn't a long sleeve blouse.
SHARON ROCHA: And what was she wearing when you left?
PETERSON: Ah she had on her black pants – and like a white top with long sleeves.
SHARON ROCHA: A pullover or button or what?
PETERSON: Yeah. Pullover like ah—you know tee shirt kinda sweater kinda thing.
-- Mark S was caught lying again. This time in response to your question about the back yards being searched. Let's check out his responses on two separate posts on Facebook. It's amazing that you were so certain they searched the back yards on Covena because M Smith said they were. Lol
Renee P:
It would be in a report or something, right?
Version #1
Mark S:
"Renee Pieon, that information is in police reports and not in transcript."
Version #2
Mark S:
Unfortunately there are no reports from officers who searched and found nothing."
You should already know this, since it was you who asked him
Renee P:
It would be in a report or something, right?
However there is testimony from officer Corder verifying they did not search the back yards.
GERAGOS: Okay. As you're going along, what would your typical search be of a house? Would you go into the backyards or were you basically just trying to go through the front yards and see if there was anything around?
CORDER: Just check the front yards. Something that would be easy for a person if they were injured or something where they might stumble up to.
GERAGOS: So I understand correctly so the jury understands, you're not, you're not going inside the houses here?
CORDER: No, not inside the houses or the backyards.
GERAGOS: Or the backyards. What you're doing is looking to see in the front yards or on the side yards where you can see, I take it, whether or not somebody's either stumbled or fell or something like that?
CORDER: Yes.
You're welcome!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@VideoFanatic02
You have created about 50 accounts on YouTube alone. That doesn't even include the other platforms you post on. Get a life, STALKER!
My name isn't Scott, and the fact you think Scott Peterson is in prison replying under a YouTube account undoubtedly confirms you are a troubled individual.
VIDEOFANATIC02,
ANON EMOUS (removed by YouTube)
Sammy (removed by youtube)
Robbin Miller ( removed by YouTube)
Lisa Lisa,Provethio Altum,Trick or Trump,Lawrence Robinson, Tiffsaver,
Robin Miller, Poonan Bhatia, Ava Martinez, Tippy Canoe, Mia Gardner,
Kmremseysmith, oanne, nolaflav, jackiepowell, yes-Anastatia, 2034916, Lizk1780, PatrickFDolan, Pointerlover, darlenesutton...
Christine White
Leslie King
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
He didn't murder her. You need yo research the truth about this case.
There was no forensic evidence, eyewitnesses, video surveillance etc ever proving the States theory. Even the SF Medical examiner (Boyd Stevens) explained to the lead detective that it would be highly unlikely that 32 lbs would submerge the body. It would just float. He also said the currents would likely take the body out to sea. She was found nearly 4 months later. How do currents flowing Southbound at 4 knots place either body where they were found.
-Conner (baby) was determined to be alive until Jan 3rd by both the States expert and the Medical examiner? Furthermore, Dr Charles March testified there is no way that Scott and Laci Peterson's unborn baby could have died any earlier than Dec. 29, 2002. Dr Allison Galloway determined the baby could have even been alive as far along as Jan 14th.
-Conner was found above the high tide line and water break.
-The baby's left ear was permanently flattened against the head and a rectangular piece of material was over his ear.
-Plastic wrap knotted around his neck that had to be cut off, not far from a plastic bag which was never tested.
-The criminologist and medical examiner, both concluded that the twine could not have wrapped around Conner’s neck accidentally. Dr. Cyril Wecht noted, "never in a million years."
-Laci had a missing neck that is not consistent with any known disarticulation in aqueous environments.
-Laci's uterus was at least 10 cm (3.9") smaller than it should have been, explaining why the incision to remove Conner was not visible on her body, and the injured 9th rib, postmortem injury is in the same location where such an incision would have been made.
1
-
1
-
1