Comments by "On The Piss" (@On_The_Piss) on "Hitler's Socialism: The Evidence is Overwhelming" video.

  1. How many Cuban national industries did Castro privatise? Remind me.
    4
  2. TIK the cherry picker extraordinaire, not real socialism when it suits him, and not real capitalism when it doesn’t.
    3
  3. One word: “Privatisation”. One word that objectively proves your argument wrong on every level. But hey, keep making your little YouTube videos or whatever.
    3
  4.  @oriprogamer1404  it also has one of the strongest labour union forces in the world, safeguarding higher wages. But you omitted that for obvious reasons
    2
  5. I stopped reading at " Its due to productivity due to free market policies that scandinavians have hight salaries, not by labours unions decree". @oriprogamer1404 
    1
  6.  @afonsodealbuquerque1879  … I never suggested they don’t. Like regulation, unions are essential to keep the “free market” in check. The “free market” works against these checks, not for.
    1
  7.  @oriprogamer1404  It’s funny how almost nothing of what you said actually happens in reality. In reality wages are screwed down, year by year, never increasing with inflation - meanwhile, the profits soar. So there’s the ideology, and the reality.
    1
  8.  @oriprogamer1404  What a hilariously simplistic, smooth brained take. Such a randian hero you are.
    1
  9.  @oriprogamer1404  Nah I’m just not a simp to the “free market” like you are. Also, you’re a gamer, you’re probably about 17 years old and I really don’t need to explain anything to you because history has spoken for itself time and time again - as it will in Argentina. That guy is already bowing down to China, begging them for trade - despite claiming “he would never work with communists” before he was elected. Give me a break with that libertarian nonsense. 🙄
    1
  10. You're laughing because you've got nothing to say. Go play a video game bro! @oriprogamer1404 
    1
  11.  @afonsodealbuquerque1879  “regulations are violence” is one of the funniest statements I’ve ever heard. You libertarians really do live in a fantasy world, don’t you.
    1
  12. His “argument” that Nazi Germany was economically socialist is flawed at the roots, considering the word “privatisation” was quite literally coined to describe Nazi German economic policy of the 1930’s: “The term reprivatization, again translated directly from German (Reprivatisierung), was used frequently in the mid-1930s as The Economist reported on Nazi Germany's sale of nationalized banks back to public shareholders following the 1931 economic crisis.” Because there’s nothing more “socialist” than privatising national industries. /s TIK attempts to brush over this by using the “not real capitalism” argument, which is as disingenuous as the “not real communism” argument. 🙄🙄🙄
    1
  13.  @SepticFuddy  say it with me: “p r i v a t i s a t i o n” One word. Go ahead and look up the etymology of that word and get back to me.
    1
  14. I don't care what this revisionist channel claims, nor you. Privatisation was coined to describe Nazi German economic policy of the 1920's. I never claimed the Nazis themselves called it that. They privatised state industries. That is quite literally the polar opposite of a socialism, by definition. The political intentions of Tik (and you) by obfuscating and twisting things is obvious, but no serious historian accepts this nonsense. That's why real historians write books, and TIK makes YouTube videos. @SepticFuddy 
    1
  15. One word: “Privatisation”. One word that objectively proves his argument wrong on every level.
    1
  16.  @wtice4632 This is exactly what is being done here, but to describe capitalism. “Not real capitalism”. The revisionism on display here is truly next level.
    1
  17.  @coonhound_pharoah  His “argument” that Nazi Germany was economically socialist, considering the word “privatisation” was quite literally coined to describe Nazi German economic policy of the 1930’s: “The term reprivatization, again translated directly from German (Reprivatisierung), was used frequently in the mid-1930s as The Economist reported on Nazi Germany's sale of nationalized banks back to public shareholders following the 1931 economic crisis.” Because there’s nothing more “socialist” than privatising national industries. /s TIK attempts to brush over this by using the “not real capitalism” argument, which is as disingenuous as the “not real communism” argument. 🙄🙄🙄
    1
  18.  @TheImperatorKnight  my favourite form of socialism is the one that privatises state owned industries DURRRRRR
    1