Comments by "BigPacThatsEazyE" (@bigpacthatseazye3462) on "Putin-Kim summit: North Korea vows full support for Russia’s "sacred fight" against West, Ukraine" video.

🤡🤡🤡
3
@hercc6155 They’re not at all afraid to engage in war, it’s called mutual destruction with the use of WMDs. Based on Russia’s performance in Ukraine, I highly doubt NATO would be afraid of engaging in conventional war with Russia😂
3
@Rocksteady246 LOL if you really think that matters… glad you still misuse a term I taught you😂 I’m sensing you’re upset I know more about military affairs than stolen valour Youtubemusic
3
@Rocksteady246 Ahh typical response from someone who can’t object. Another W, take that L Youtubemusic. You clearly can’t think of anything 🤣
3
@rockyjohnson9243 He sticks to the same talking points, he’s got no rebuttal for your points aside from past events 😂
3
@Rocksteady246 And yet when they withdrew, they didn’t collapse like the Soviet Union did🤣 in fact, they’ve only gotten stronger!
2
@matthewbaumann630 He’s programmed to think the Soviet Union and Russia are two totally different things😂
2
@Rocksteady246 If you can’t comprehend the fact that militarily, the Soviet Union was far stronger than modern day Russia, and was led by - ahem - Russians, then maybe open a book and stop repeating yourself 🤣
2
@Rocksteady246 Eek, with no evidence. Keep projecting Youtubemusic/HairyMan
2
@otisthecanadianbulldog2400 That’s your response to the flaws of JP? Geez, didn’t think you’d give up that easy.
2
@otisthecanadianbulldog2400 Oh wow, you’re so brave and unique. JP must be proud of you🤣 go clean your room!
2
@Kraken_Mybutt For you to say they sided with Russians both economically and will likely join militarily in a world conflict is just hilarious; based on what? The two have been doing trade for years, while China and India have been in economic agreements for years as well; that does not equate to “siding militarily”. Just look at how many agreements have been signed between the US and India. Look at how much aid the US continues to give Pakistan. NATO too has plenty of allies outside of the alliance; “and more nukes”. That’s literally your only point, because the amount of soldiers is irrelevant in a non-conventional conflict. Go teach your brainless geopolitics elsewhere, you’re clearly not educated on the topic buddy.
2
@Rocksteady246 Is that a question? Since you don’t even know how a democracy works, I guess you wouldn’t understand how much either side of the Cold War was spending as a % of their GDP comparatively. But we all know you ignore the details and only look at the big picture to play ignorant. Try again, another W for me
1
@Rocksteady246 No need to put it in brackets boomer, I understand you’re upset you can’t comprehend how much more Russia spent on their military when they were the USSR compared to now🤣 But ofc someone like yourself thinks it’s okay to side with a communist dictatorship in NK, the irony…
1
@Rocksteady246 Yes i do, excellent comeback brainless 😂
1
@Rocksteady246 I am not. But clearly the two of us got you frazzled enough to repeat yourself and respond with 4 comments each time. Now THATS some cope🤡 try some actual rebuttals there kid
1
@Rocksteady246 Good one🤡
1
@canadaclub8920 exactly 😂
1
@larisamarks4236 you edit your comments, and yet you continue have glaring grammatical errors? you’re not that bright are you?
1
@Kraken_Mybutt sureee
1
@Kraken_Mybutt No response? Thought so. Go back to school junior
1