Comments by "BigPacThatsEazyE" (@bigpacthatseazye3462) on "Alex Jones ordered to pay nearly US$1B to Sandy Hook families in damages trial" video.

  1. sorry this didn’t fit your narrative
    18
  2. Serves him right
    15
  3. I find Alex Jones ridiculous.
    12
  4. Freedom of speech doesn’t protect slander or libel
    12
  5. probably because he’s an example of how far an individuals followers will go when given malicious lies to work with, including stalking, harassment, and death threats
    12
  6.  @couch4330  Knowingly calling the school shooting victims’ parents ‘crisis actors’ and the whole shooting staged to tear away people’s 2nd amendment rights to get a reaction to the point that these individuals were harassed and received death threats to the point they had to move, comparing that to people angry about police brutality and having individuals within the movement burning up your local Target? I’m sorry but if that’s comparable in your world view, there’s no helping you
    8
  7.  @domsugar9160  This is a defamation trial, not a criminal murder trial. There’s a difference champ.
    7
  8.  @couch4330  Clearly you’re not getting the point; if you think the two are comparable, i repeat that there’s no helping you. If you want to find an individual member of the BLM who openly stated that they wanted the destruction of property during their protests? Go for it champ. I have, and that seems to be why the only method you end up with is walking away because you fail to justify your initial responses. Good luck in the real world. I’ll probably see you on another comment section you chose to attempt to argue me on
    7
  9.  @JasonSmith-zu3rn  spreading of false claims that had lead to stalking, harassment, and threatening of survivors.
    6
  10.  @couch4330  “but he retracted his statement, he apologized!” doesn’t mean you don’t face consequences for you actions. if there wasn’t a threat of litigation, you know Jones would still be spewing the narrative.
    6
  11.  @couch4330  For someone who just thinks I’m a troll, you really are obsessed with responding to me only to eventually flee after realizing you have no legitimate take 😂
    6
  12.  @domsugar9160  I didn’t say he did? Good one
    5
  13.  @jeffs7573  speaking of reading, try reading the actual constitution and understand how this is not an affront to an individuals 1st amendment. have you been watching the lawsuit? or only tune in when the big headlines come out because you feel sorry for Mr Jones?
    5
  14. And Jones is learning what happens if you maliciously spin the truth to harm others.
    4
  15.  @uchihasurvival  not willing to go down that rabbit hole
    4
  16.  @-131oodd4  he committed slander, which isn’t protected under freedom of speech when harm is done. maybe you should read up on the constitution.
    4
  17.  @-131oodd4  it’s literally in the constitution. you don’t have to watch TV to understand that. sorry that your parents coddled you to the point you thought the world revolves around you and your narrative, but it doesn’t buddy. go back to “educating” yourself by watching mr jones
    4
  18.  @-131oodd4  i’ve never said something to the point that it got large groups of people to target individuals and their families and harass them. but nice attempt at generating a point
    4
  19. You wouldn’t know justice if it hit you in the face. Read up on their constitution sometime, maybe you’ll understand then.
    3
  20. Defamation and any civil suit for that matter are meant to have high penalties; it’s not expected that the victims will receive the full amount at all, but it’ll put financial pressure on Jones, his company, and the parent company
    3
  21.  @couch4330  My work here is done.
    3
  22.  @-131oodd4  lost what? how? sounds like a cowards way out who hasn’t provided an actually rebuttal but instead writes incomprehensible comments because he can’t write properly
    3
  23. ever heard of a logical fallacy? so one person doing something terrible is excusable if the others are ignored? and you considered it comedy for what happened after the statements were made?
    3
  24.  @googlesucks662  unfortunately that wouldn’t hold up in the international courts, especially with the backing of the US
    2
  25.  @googlesucks662  are you suggesting foreign nations create these claims ‘against’ the US for damages they’ve done? just trying to gauge what you meant by that
    2
  26.  @retarkso8470  it’s a ridiculous amount, i agree, but that’s the case with most civil suits especially when dealing with high-value individuals who own businesses. it’s merely to put pressure on him financially but the families won’t see even half that amount
    2
  27.  @LogicalCanadian  But okay, keep evading my points because apparently a timeline matters. I just showed you it was MORE THAN A YEAR. Almost 2 in fact. And whether or not he apologized, doesn’t excuse it as what transpired from what he said. He merely backed down because of what happened with the victims’ parents. Anymore excuses there Calvin?
    2
  28.  @TheJimprez  well put
    2
  29.  @domsugar9160  lol why specifically 2? do you understand what slander is? it is providing a lie directed at a group of individuals which in the end causes harm of some sort of nature. 1. harassment 2. stalking, and 3. death threats both written and in person by Jone’s followers. there, gave you three so you hopefully understand easier
    2
  30.  @domsugar9160  “hOw hE sLanDeRinG”
    2
  31.  @couch4330  yeah, and? i wouldn’t defend BLM supporters who harmed other people. what’s with the logical fallacies here?
    2
  32. Only thing ridiculous is your attempt at spelling.
    2
  33.  @-131oodd4  you may think that the plaintiffs and their families are naive enough to think they’ll get all that money, but they won’t and they know that.
    2
  34.  @-131oodd4  LOL WHAT? holy you keep pivoting each comment to make a different argument. this applies to Canada’s charter of rights and freedoms ya nimrod. i can suggest you read that as well, but i would imagine you wouldn’t take the time to do that. good luck in the real world
    2
  35.  @-131oodd4  you claimed this will harm the freedom of speech when this is occurring in the US and is compatible with their constitution, you claimed there was an agenda when there was a clear point to defamation based on actual harm you’d like to ignore, then you claim that slander trials don’t have a price tag like that - which they do for high level defendants, and now you’re claiming your talking about it harming Canada’s freedom of speech? when we have the same limitations if not more?
    2
  36.  @-131oodd4  i would suggest that yes i do, at least relative to you considering how lack of knowledge you have on the topic besides “jones is nice, don’t be mean, he apologize”
    2
  37.  @LogicalCanadian  current societal issues of the US? Yeah unfortunately the the constitution isn’t a living document, just ask any hardline 2nd amendment supporter. i’m not sure i understand the point of your example so i’ll make it clear for you; 1st amendment does not protect slander/libel when the act produces harm, which has been obvious since the beginning of the first trial.
    1
  38.  @LogicalCanadian  you’re getting confused with hate speech. i never said Jones committed hate speech.
    1
  39.  @LogicalCanadian  you can cause harm without specifically calling for it; if he maliciously for two years stated parents were crisis actors and that no child actually died but staged it to take away peoples guns and to ‘act now’, you’re going to get lunatics who commit heinous acts - as they did - whether or not Jones wanted them to
    1
  40.  @LogicalCanadian  LOL you don’t have to say a specific name? where does it say that😂 he pointed to a group.
    1
  41.  @LogicalCanadian  I don’t believe the media, Alex spoke for himself for many years on the topic. Kinda self explanatory
    1
  42.  @LogicalCanadian  Again, just a reminder, to make this clearer for you so you understand… 1st amendment does not protect slander or libel, especially when they cause harm (whether financial, physical, or emotional). This was NOT a case on hate speech, and i never said it was. Keep trying
    1
  43.  @LogicalCanadian  no? nothing? that’s what i thought.
    1
  44.  @LogicalCanadian  Now you’re backtracking because you never mentioned dates. His rhetoric was more than “less than a year”, so whether or not he “made comment in 2016” and apologized the next year due to facing backlash from what had happened to the victims’ parents doesn’t matter. btw, what comment did he make in 2016??? I gave you dates from the beginning of 2013 all the way to september 2014 and beyond of what he said. Believe that would be more than a year?
    1
  45.  @LogicalCanadian  AGAIN, read my comments in entirety Calvin, it’s like teaching a child. No one is ever saying he called on his followers to cause violence or incited violence. THAT WOULD MAKE THIS CASE ABOUT HATE SPEECH. Which again, it is not. Sorry your feelings are hurt because you “feel” like this suppressing freedom of speech, but facts don’t care about your feelings; fact is, again, freedom of speech doesn’t protect slander/libel.
    1
  46.  @LogicalCanadian  Btw, i didn’t see the link you sent, so resend in a separate comment
    1
  47.  @LogicalCanadian  contradictory ? you’re the one who keeps repeating themselves and not acknowledging what slander is? you keep wanting to make this about Jones calling on people to commit violence which isn’t what the trial is about. keep trying, it’s funny to see you squirm with excuses
    1
  48.  @LogicalCanadian  Oh specifically calling out the parents as crisis actors who’s kids didn’t really die but are just anti-gun activists run by the globalists. Totally not specific. Again, nice try buddy.
    1
  49.  @LogicalCanadian  Let me guess, you’ll address by repeating yourself how Jones apologized and didn’t call on his followers to violence? 😂
    1
  50. Idk how people look up to that shrivel of a man
    1
  51. slander ; leading to harassment, stalking and death threats. not that hard if you’ve been following the suit
    1
  52.  @frankarouet  didnt say i agreed with the amount? it’s a ridiculous amount that i’m sure the plaintiffs understand they won’t even see half of it but most defamation and civil suits for that matter are like this, especially when the defendant is known to be a high value individual who owns multiple companies. it’s meant to put financial pressure on him.
    1
  53.  @frankarouet  it’s not the amount that matters or whether peoples feelings were ‘hurt’ either in this case. it’s what the ensuing impact that the statements Jones said had on the families, and what they continue to have; you can’t ignore that because it doesn’t fit your narrative about free speech. there are consequences in life.
    1
  54.  @frankarouet  The amount results from the harm caused during the infraction. It’s one direction there buddy. Not my fault you don’t understand the American constitution. You don’t like the result, good for you. Unfortunately, the legal system doesn’t operate that way and you’ll just have to deal with it. I’d suggest reading up on slander and libel, re evaluate this trial and the first one, and then come back for an actual conversation. Good luck in the real world “freedom fighter”
    1
  55.  @frankarouet  Ah yes, a kid who has studied this extensively. Don’t need you to explain anything, it’s just you that doesn’t understand. Again, this story doesn’t fit your narrative.
    1
  56.  @domsugar9160  are you illiterate?
    1
  57.  @domsugar9160  no going to respond to the three things? dam boy, that’s some coward s*** boy
    1
  58.  @jeffs7573  you clearly don’t understand the constitution then.
    1
  59.  @jeffs7573  you understand that the constitution in the US does not protect an individuals freedom of speech when it comes to slander and libel? have you even read the document? or do you just pretend to know everything? get reading
    1
  60.  @-131oodd4  are you illiterate? do you ever spell check your work? it’s hard to understand you. The defamation comes from the harm caused by the lies he stated prior, it doesn’t matter what he says now and whether or not he apologized; have you been following the suit at all?
    1
  61.  @-131oodd4  evade evade evade, that’s the point of my argument you’re gonna address? okay fine, i’ll respond. defamation suits, hell a majority of civil lawsuits come with large price tags. it’s not expected that the accused will be able to pay all or even half of it. but if an individuals net worth is measured in the millions (especially someone of Jones’ stature), the amount is going to be ridiculously high so as to put financial pressure on him
    1
  62.  @-131oodd4  right, you’re just watching global news for fun. LOL again, you’re*. learn to write properly before embarrassing yourself with such absurd statements. your ignorance is on full display 😂😂
    1
  63.  @-131oodd4  forced on? you do realize why the EU was created? you know where the origins of freedom of speech came from?
    1
  64.  @wasiraza7514  Yeah i’ve sort’ve realized that. poor kid
    1
  65.  @MatthewsPick  “supposed”? do explain
    1
  66. oh man, the brain rot is real with this one… so you’re accusing Jones of lying now?
    1