Comments by "BigPacThatsEazyE" (@bigpacthatseazye3462) on "Jurors, judges face safety threats following Trump indictments" video.

  1. oh yeah, cry for the billionaire with lifetime secret service protection…
    5
  2.  @lonewanderer1900 Wdym fabricated? The tapes are right there.
    4
  3.  @quienvive675 LOL he won 2020? Now that’s some pure cope, be f’real
    3
  4.  @couch4330 Yeah, the party of taking your kids away is the compassionate Republican party right?
    3
  5.  @couch4330  Addtionally, that’s called cognitive dissonance.
    2
  6.  @couch4330  My argument was simply shaming someone for over focusing on the safety of a billionaire known to not care about the safety - not just in this case, of the jurors - of thousands, hell you can argue millions during the pandemic. you instead went on a tangent bringing up political beliefs and leanings despite you not even knowing where i am politically, you just (like a simpleton) assume i’m a “lefty” because i don’t approve of Trump’s criminal behaviour. Grow up buddy, that’s cognitive dissonance.
    2
  7.  @derekwoodford9955  recently? that was years ago buddy, you realize how many attempts are man on those in office? get a grip kid
    2
  8. Ahhh the cope😂
    2
  9.  @derekwoodford9955  Did you forget the 20+ times i’ve explained to you how indictments work? Oh right, you ran from that conversation 😮‍💨
    2
  10.  @derekwoodford9955  “So far your predictions”, buddy, i argued this last week. Do i need to explain to you how long this process can be? Do i need to remind of when the trial dates are set?
    2
  11.  @derekwoodford9955  That’s fine, if four indictments of a former president don’t matter to you, that’s on you buckaroo
    2
  12.  @derekwoodford9955  Well, i gave you multiple charges. Answered your questions, and all this has lead to what i said last time you ran from a thread: neither of us can prove the other wrong considering it’s time based, but again Trump hasn’t “beaten” any of them😂🤣
    2
  13.  @derekwoodford9955  another definitive statement; you’ve obviously learned nothing Derek🤣
    2
  14.  @derekwoodford9955  Still coping, eh? Is Trump in office from 2020?
    2
  15. @user-mh3oh3nk8x sure “joined six months ago”, keep rebooting with that cope 🤡
    2
  16.  @derekwoodford9955  the 4th indictment? asking for literally the same number +1 of what biden earned to turn the tide. “we need”. how convenient he asked for those numbers specifically …. yeah that’s attempting to overturn an election with that state alone. keep trying Derek, as seen on the previous thread you have nowhere logically to run to.
    2
  17.  @derekwoodford9955  Oh is that so? How?
    1
  18.  @derekwoodford9955  I literally just asked, how was he threatened. That’s not running. Try again kid.
    1
  19.  @derekwoodford9955 do you not see my comment above? it’s your turn to attempt a response buddy. try again
    1
  20.  @derekwoodford9955 ”recently? that was years ago buddy, you realize how many attempts are man on those in office? get a grip kid” There you go, make it easier for your confused little mind, get those gears working
    1
  21.  @derekwoodford9955 Nope, just ricin in the mail. Pay attention That was your last
    1
  22.  @derekwoodford9955 All I see is the “Deranged” headline which seems quite obvious where the source is with lingo like that😂 If you’re talking about Marie Fiorenza who wrote EMAILS to a head of a school in Trump’s residency neighbourhood (someone she has no prior connection to), and think that’s a genuine threat to him, I can’t help you buddy. Clearly you don’t know how often famous people get these
    1
  23.  @derekwoodford9955 And it is specifically presidents (or in this case, ex presidents) who have these people dealt with. Ever heard of Craig Robertson? Again, nothing new whatsoever when someone like Trump has a lifetime of secret service protection, and I don’t feel sorry considering the numerous life’s he endangered while president🤷🏻‍♂️
    1
  24.  @derekwoodford9955  What, you mean the impeachments of the phone Russia investigation? Yeah keep listening to the media there pal. & yes I have, now over 92. Have you read any of the indictments? Or just listened to talking heads dispute them?
    1
  25.  @derekwoodford9955  And probably counts 36-38 in the classified documents case are pretty damning, wouldn’t you think?
    1
  26. @user-mh3oh3nk8x long line inferiority? damn dude, stop projecting on a global news youtube video 🤣
    1
  27. @user-mh3oh3nk8x uh huh, okay buddy. keep dreaming 🤡
    1