General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

BigPacThatsEazyE
Global News
comments

Comments by "BigPacThatsEazyE" (@bigpacthatseazye3462) on "Prosecutors drop Adnan Syed's criminal charges after new DNA testing results" video.

No evidence that he was guilty, nice try boomer
12
@purplehaze8557 Everything but the DNA… hmmmm that’s strange
7
finally, justice!!
6
@bloopityblorp6365 Perfectly well huh? how about the Brady violations? The lack of scrutiny over two suspects - one of which ALSO wrote a threatening letter to the victim regarding making her ‘disappear’, and the other who is in prison for sexual assault - both who knew the victim? how about investigating them? what makes you so certain as a simple civilian that Adnan 100% committed this crime compared to the other two? why not have an investigation open?
6
@bloopityblorp6365 If you could read, those same articles are stating that prosecutors strangely asked for his release due to evidence not previously disclosed being released now to his defence team, including the two suspects (brady violations!) and “UNRELIABLE CELLPHONE DATA” that they heavily leaned on during the trial
6
@bloopityblorp6365 Nope! but you similarly don’t have proof that the cell data was admitted appropriately and that government turning of evidence was used properly, which is exactly why the prosecution laid the case. which is exactly why you’re wrong in asserting he 100% is guilty. nice try. keep evading my points
5
@purplehaze8557 too bad for you we live in a society where you’re innocent until proven guilty; the judge ruled his conviction inadmissible and puts the onus on the prosecution to prove his guilt while the investigation continues for the two other suspects (brady violations?). again, the ball is in your court.
5
@lalonguecarabine4952 Oh yeah? What ‘facts’? The same ones the prosecution later recanted and requested for his early release? Nice try
4
@bloopityblorp6365 The inadmissible data? And the threatening letters as direct proof of her murder? Reaching for straws; that’s not how the legal system operates buddy. Again, nice try.
4
@bloopityblorp6365 ever heard of police pressure during interrogations? to help officers solve a case even when they don’t have the right suspects? COACHING
4
@purplehaze8557 proof?
4
@bloopityblorp6365 exactly, and how did that go? not proof. OH WOW okay so threatening comments or letters are DIRECT evidence to murder now? geeeez, when the most hated man in the world dies, anyone can be convicted in the world i guess because of words :(( good grief you need a dose of reality😂😂
3
@bloopityblorp6365 i feel like you’re purposely ignoring any of the points i made because you know you have no argument besides your own bias 😂
3
@bloopityblorp6365 Simp for crime? Now that’s some lazy argument. I’ve literally rebutted against all your points? And you’ve chosen to ignore them and instead focus on the prosecution. Get over yourself, the facts are plain and simple; you’ve just inputted your bias.
3
@lynx882 Nope. Even the prosecution is no longer “certain” he is. Nice try.
2
@lynx882 “so confirmed in your … belief” is not correct btw. Nor is establishing 100% certainty of guilt when the prosecution even admitted its weak leaning on ‘substantial’ evidence. Keep evading my points though on the other two suspects child.
2
@lynx882 Again, read my comments thoroughly. The DNA found on the shoes in the trunk were brought up IN THE FIRST TRIAL 20 YEARS AGO. That’s not the analysis i’m talking about, i’m talking about the one released 7 days ago (which they haven’t established where on the scene) that ultimately led to the prosecution dropping their case. How is that so hard to understand?
2
@lynx882 HAHA ignored just like the rest of my comments? You’ve clearly been ignoring the entire time if you still think i’m talking about DNA evidence from two decades ago😂
2
@lynx882 Sounds like someone who lost an argument they lost since the beginning. Full circle.
2
@lynx882 And he’s still evading 😂
2
@lynx882 Thought you were going to ignore me? Or was your ego that bruised that you couldn’t hold an argument?
2
@bloopityblorp6365 only a simpleton would assume that. dUh rAcE
2
@bloopityblorp6365 Really? Perfect? Do explain..
2
@bloopityblorp6365 address the Brady Violations. explain why the cellphone data was reliable instead of simply being ‘admitted’. address the DNA analysis released. address why the PROSECUTION TEAM requested his release. stop evading
2
@bloopityblorp6365 Case in point; why haven’t you addressed the reasoning behind the prosecution dropping the case? why haven’t you addressed the Brady violations?
2
@bloopityblorp6365 Is that so? Hmm, that’s weird what the prosecution did….
2
lawyers who rely on unreliable evidence as 100% proof of guilt are already spelling out the doom of society and the justice system. heard of the wrongful conviction statistics in the US?
2
@lynx882 Lynx clearly you need to read the previous comments because you’re only repeating what others have said. The cellphone data which the prosecution leaned heavily on was considered weak, to the point that it was questioned months ago this year for its admissibility
2
@lynx882 You know who else wrote threatening letters to her? One of the two other suspects that is currently being investigated, while the second is locked up for multiple sexual assault charges and knew the victim.
2
@lynx882 Thirdly, “his black drug dealer”? you mean his friend from high school who happened to have had run ins dealing pot, which was considered a factor in the baltimore police ‘coaching’ him during interrogation to confess (you don’t normally get probation for helping bury a body unless the police really need your help to checkmark a case)
2
@lynx882 Again, both of us could argue about who could’ve LIED about the story and neither of us could be right , especially considering Wilde’s story being inconsistent throughout the years (hence why he’s stayed out of the public eye since 2014)
2
@lynx882 And LASTLY, if there arrives DNA analysis belonging to another individual at the scene that had been released just yesterday, the court is in its right to reopen an investigation WHICH IS WHAT IT IS DOING BTW. but of course you’re not searching for true justice, you just want to see a brown man locked up. any more attempts?
2
@lynx882 Corrupt DA? And where has that narrative come from do you think? DA released him months ago, but it was the PROSECUTION that dropped it pending further investigations considering… well you know, brady violations, release of further DNA analysis. Just goes to show how little you know about this case. But okay, call me a Muslim all you want, it only exposes your bias more😂
1
@lynx882 You’re faced with the fact that the prosecution lost its will to continue pursuing the verdict and instead relinquished the case over to a secondary investigation on two other suspects (brady violations , know your criminal law kiddo), and instead want to ignore that and develop a narrative that the DA is corrupt because he let a brown man go.. pathetic. run away champ
1
@lynx882 your bias and naivety has been on full display if you’re literally suggesting he is 100% guilty when even the prosecution dropped it. misinformed to the t*ts
1
@bloopityblorp6365 weren’t you just judging my argument for it’s ‘value’? and now you’re gonna assume my race based on a viewpoint? hilarious
1
@hj6004 good one?
1
@bloopityblorp6365 stay salty that your narrative isn’t viable and an innocent man is now free. good luck out there boomer 😂
1
@bloopityblorp6365 Repulse most people? Get a grip buddy, the moment the lac of DNA evidence gets over ruled by threatening letters and inadmissible data evidence is the justice system getting thrown out the window. I could say the same about you and your motives, perhaps his background might have to do with it?
1
@bloopityblorp6365 LOL you mean Wilds’ testimony? Whose story had changed multiple times since then? Furthermore, the prosecutors ADMITTED they lost faith in the evidence they had initially provided (including the cell date you are obsessing over which was ruled inadmissible) which is why they dropped the case and are awaiting further investigations
1
@bloopityblorp6365 the very people who sent him to jail are getting him out, and today with the admission of touch DNA analysis ADMITTED (which you’re obsessing over) as evidence that he is innocent.
1
@bloopityblorp6365 address the Brady Violations. explain why the cellphone data was reliable instead of simply it being ‘admitted’. address the DNA analysis released today. address why THE PROSECUTION TEAM requested his release. stop evading because you want a brown man in jail
1
@bloopityblorp6365 the people who sent him to jail are the ones getting him out, and yesterday with the admission of touch DNA analysis ADMITTED as evidence that he is innocent.
1
@bloopityblorp6365 what’s wrong buddy?
1
@BluntedZephyr I don’t think he does
1
@lynx882 Who tf is talking about direct proof with DNA? Did i say that because of the release he is 100% innocent? No. I stated that the prosecution DROPPED THEIR CASE AGAINST HIM AFTER REQUESTING HIS RELEASE MONTHS AGO BECAUSE OF THE DNA ANALYSIS YESTERDAY. You’re the fool.
1
@Howard0Beale you seem to be the one triggered that he’s been set free 😂😂
1
@bloopityblorp6365 that was your only rebuttal? and it took you that long? do explain. if the prosecution for the case drops it, you think the victims family is going to pay another?
1
LOL calling someone a “simp for crime” is your idea of an argument? you’re a child. i’d simp for justice
1
@bloopityblorp6365 I know what simping is, no need for projection on YouTube, keep that stuff private buddy. Again, evade evade evade. Are you going to answer? Or keep ignoring?
1
@bloopityblorp6365 And who is that DA? Brady violations? DNA analysis? No? Nothing? Thought so.
1
@bloopityblorp6365 Get got buddy, you just exposed yourself of having no knowledge on the topic 😂
1
@bloopityblorp6365 😂😂☠️☠️☠️
1
@lynx882 clearly you are.
1
@purplehaze8557 What indications?
1
@purplehaze8557 i’m waiting boomer
1
@purplehaze8557 sounds like you can’t respond to my arguments 😂 i’ve ran circles around you buddy
1
@purplehaze8557 All of that has been proved to not be credible, again even from the prosecution. Hence why they asked for his release. But maybe you should get the sand out of your ears and stop living in a fantasy. Keep it coming with the ad hominems, you’re just mad an innocent brown man was released 😂😂😂
1
@purplehaze8557 And apparently DNA evidence isn’t important ??
1
@purplehaze8557 Brady violations don’t mean a thing? Two other suspects - one with a criminal record who is now in jail and another who sent a threatening letter to the victim - don’t require investigating? Oops, more holes in your argument
1
@purplehaze8557 You literally repeated what your simple minded bf said😆
1
@lynx882 Nothing? pathetic
1
@lynx882 There’s no response after my four comments. You clearly don’t know anything about the topic, and instead repeat what others said. No one is saying DNA is used to convict. Actually respond to my comments. You’ve been exposed.
1
@paulthomas963 It absolutely does, you’re a little late to the party; have you not seen the latest updates? And I’m well aware of the differences between the letters.. not confusing them but nice try buddy. Keep crying.
1