Comments by "BigPacThatsEazyE" (@bigpacthatseazye3462) on "Trump lawyers oppose request to turn over Jan. 6 evidence, citing 1st Amendment" video.

  1. He’s just a big time whiner, scared about any opposition. Sounds like a dictator …
    13
  2. clearly you haven’t read the indictment …
    9
  3. Uh huh okay
    8
  4.  @AK-ki2os the same way you’ve been crying since 2020 about a stolen election, and since 2016 about hillary being locked up. keep coping
    7
  5.  @Baaliwood hahah from a jail cell? be for real😂 he couldn’t even win against joe biden
    7
  6.  @derekwoodford9955  LOL keep dreaming, you’re obviously still hurt from 2020😂
    6
  7.  @OneManJam  LOL okay buddy, keep dreaming and coping with 2020🤣
    5
  8.  @tonyg17a  Thank you for proving my point, please seek help sir.
    4
  9.  @derekwoodford9955  Wait, the price of gas being out of control because of Biden? That really shows your lack of intellect Derek, another shot in the foot. So if foreign elections don’t hurt or help you much, why bother asking what I would do if Trump (which is laughable) is re-elected? I’m not American either, wdym what would I do?
    3
  10.  @derekwoodford9955  Another question you constantly evade; with trial dates set, HOW HAS TRUMP “BEATEN” INDICTMENTS? Define “beaten” there, pal.
    3
  11.  @derekwoodford9955  Ouuu looks like my questions were a bit too tough for you to actually answer. Maybe take the time to look into how indictments work instead of projecting your lack of intellect “lol”…
    3
  12.  @derekwoodford9955 You people? Can you stop projecting and seriously answer a question? If Trump miraculously won (which he won’t😂) sure I’d be coping, the same way you have since 2020. There’s your answer. It’ll have no other effect on my life
    3
  13.  @derekwoodford9955 Read more books? Says the guy who thinks people should be thrown in jail immediately following indictments🤣 Why bother set a trial date if HE HAS BEATEN THEM????? 😂 Answer that pal
    3
  14.  @derekwoodford9955 LOL WHAT?? No criminal charges??? What does FELONY mean to you? Are you not aware there are 38 FELONY CHARGES😂😂 oh my god, this is hilarious at this point
    3
  15.  @derekwoodford9955 No i can see your comments, you just keep repeating that he’s not in jail when then again that’s not how indictments work. Furthermore, felonies are considered criminal (there im helping you out) and you can look up the current charges. Okay, so there are three active indictments, what “previous” ones are you talking about? Because you’re shifting the goal post at this point since you got caught😂
    3
  16.  @derekwoodford9955 Oh i’m sure it’s the youtube algorithm, okay pal. And no, incorrect answers does not mean i don’t like them. In fact, i’m enjoying seeing your incorrect answers because they’re only proving my point that you don’t know what you’re talking about😂
    3
  17.  @derekwoodford9955  Great! You’re very much welcome to your opinion, but that’s different from trying to claim he has “beaten” the indictments. Again, can’t walk that one back palz
    3
  18.  @derekwoodford9955  Oh my bad, you’re just not good at demonstrating your knowledge on indictments then😂
    3
  19.  @derekwoodford9955  Oh idk, maybe to get a better education? Statistically speaking, no one can even live off of that, it’s well below Canada’s average liveable income. But whatever helps you sleep at night! “Cope” - the irony as i walk through how the conversation turned you into a walking goalpost and you suggest “I am making this as easy for you to understand”. Big oof, take the L.
    3
  20.  @derekwoodford9955  I assumed what? You’re not even making sense and you haven’t been since i cornered you to answer how he has “BEATEN” the indictments, OR EVEN THE BIDEN QUESTION WHICH YOU CONTINUE TO EVADE
    3
  21.  @derekwoodford9955 never said three, i’ve said two. the second indictment has the exact date, the first one (SD case) has the month of March, no specific day; don’t just rely on one source
    3
  22.  @derekwoodford9955 that won’t lead to a trial? two are scheduled, and the third (LIKE I SAID IF YOU ACTUALLY READ MY COMMENTS) literally happened last week; they don’t dole out trial dates immediately after an indictment is released, it took months before the second indictment’s trial date was set after the indictment release. I THOUGHT YOU KNEW HOW INDICTMENTS WORK?😂😂😂
    3
  23.  @derekwoodford9955 None of the three are technically considered civil. Even the SD case’s felony charges are being examined to an underlying crime post-falsifying business records. i’m not going to hold your hand through this buddy, it’s not that hard. like i said, my work here is done. you’ve been exposed, hop back on the oasis and take some time to reflect pal
    3
  24.  @derekwoodford9955 Thank you for the commendation, I appreciate it.
    3
  25.  @derekwoodford9955 Did you find out they’re not civil suits? That’s a big oof on your part, maybe know your material before attempting to make an argument. Embarrassing.
    3
  26.  @derekwoodford9955  were? the three indictments are involved in criminal cases buddy. Trump is only involved in two civil suits right now; E Jean Carroll case, and the NY Attorney General Letitia James case. So i ask if you, GET SPECIFIC, on what civil cases you’re talking about?
    3
  27.  @derekwoodford9955  I would refrain from responding to avoid further embarrassment Derek.
    3
  28.  @starbombentertainment6225  good one?
    3
  29.  @Baaliwood  Again, you’re not acknowledging the points I made and ignoring the broader impact the TCJA has on corporations. Including nearly 320$ billion in benefits, 2.289 trillion in national debt over the next decade. These impacts include higher budget deficit, higher TRADE deficit, top 20% of American earners receiving 65% of the so called tax benefits, greater income inequality, and would ultimately lead to inflation (which by the numbers you’ve just provided, would seem far less in that case). swing and a miss. there’s a reason why 30% supported the bill while almost 40% were against it.
    3
  30.  @tonyg17a  sir, when were you involved in a car accident?
    2
  31.  @jaundice_japlin He’s not the brightest “they” have. He’s walking back a lot of his statements at this point 😂
    2
  32.  @derekwoodford9955 WHEN DID I SAY THEY WERE CONVICTIONS? Holy, you’re moving the goal post kilometres away buddy. First he’s “beaten” them, then there’s no criminal charges (when there are almost 40 felony charges), then you’re talking about past ones (which you have yet to point out), now you’re talking about convictions? Yea no s*** sherlock, then we’d be talking about him in jail (not immediately after indictments, just a reminder for you pal 😉)
    2
  33.  @derekwoodford9955  “Trump beat all the other indictments, how will this be any different? Get specific.” - 2 days ago, under ascensionvehicle5680’s comment “Stand with Trump🙌” There’s your quote, you’re welcome buddy. Easy. Now go read a book and take that L.
    2
  34.  @derekwoodford9955 What does it matter what I think? I don’t confuse the subjective with the objective; unlike you, i’m not saying HE’S BEEN CONVICTED BY THE OTHER INDICTMENTS - while you’re claiming he has beaten the others😂😂😂
    2
  35.  @derekwoodford9955 (edited) 😂 uh huh, okay buddy, keep evading , i quoted you , i exposed you, and i hit you with a question you can’t answer, my work here is done
    2
  36. all i hear is waaaah, the cope is real
    2
  37.  @joellyos  4? more like two, and it came from a top echelon of the democrat party. don’t kid yourself, some of us pay attention to things outside of the MSM junior. keep coping
    2
  38.  @dashforcash6555  okay mr Doordash, what’s in it then?
    2
  39.  @dashforcash6555  Okay, so evade my question, good job. And yes technically he is, but when the evidence is so blatant and been his own lawyers can’t come up with excuses, use your head and don’t be such a political shill.
    2
  40.  @Baaliwood  As for better middle class, i had to write a separate comment because of how ludicrous that statement is. Is that by the one metric that average american families made $ 5,000 more? by what metrics are you using, and what policies directly did that? Trump’s tax cut policies fell victim to trickle down, as many point to those gdp per capita numbers as ludicrously. Corporations and big banks pockets nearly 32$ billion extra, with the richest being taxed far less than before (which, hey if you support the upper class, good on you) and that by no means helped the middle class. if anything, the middle class has gotten poorer and further from class mobility under the trump administration (a trend which has been present longer than before trump’s presidency, i’ll admit that because i’m not a political shill). but nice try buddy with your talking points, come back with some research before you make a fool of yourself
    2
  41. ⁠ @Baaliwood They absolutely benefited the most. “Your numbers are wrong” is not an argument; CBO provided those. Where did your “unbiased non partisan (which is redundant btw) studies” come from?
    2
  42.  @Baaliwood Funny how you failed to acknowledge any of the other points i made, and stick to the middle class argument, specifically on tax cuts when there are so many other metrics to look to. I wonder why you ignored those?
    2
  43.  @tonyg17a  okay boomerang king, okay buddy
    1
  44.  @derekwoodford9955  And here you refrain from answering my question
    1
  45.  @derekwoodford9955  Fine, here’s my answer; emotionally, because you seem to have a personal stake in Trump despite you saying the contrary. Now for mine ‘buddy’; how has Biden’s direct actions caused the global gas prices to increase? Furthermore, if you’re not American and have no stake in who wins the election, why do you think I would? What do you mean by what would I “do”? I’ll wait, this should be good.
    1
  46.  @derekwoodford9955 I’ll give you another chance to answer properly; how has Trump beaten these indictments if they are continuing? Why continue them if he has beaten them?? How has Biden’s direct actions caused the global rise in gas prices? And don’t just insert a multilateral institution without explaining yourself, you don’t look bright doing that buddy
    1
  47. ⁠ @derekwoodford9955 Getting off the internets? Read a book? Says the guy making 10k a year and doesn’t even know how indictments work, basing his analysis on feelings 😂 good luck out there junior, someday i hope you’ll smarten up!
    1
  48.  @derekwoodford9955  I never said you said that. You said he beat the indictment because he’s NOT IN JAIL. I never suggested you think he should be, but clearly by saying he “beat” the charges because he’s not in jail is laughable. You can’t walk that one back buddy. I’m sorry but did I not set out the dates of the three trials? The first one is not until March🤣 tunnel vision much?
    1
  49.  @derekwoodford9955  So to summarize, you don’t even know that all three indictments are going to trial still, you can’t even mention the fact you said he has “beaten” them with no evidence whatsoever other than he’s not in jail, you claim there have been no criminal charges despite the numerous felony charges (and still claim you know how indictments work) you resort to “it is of my opinion” that he won’t get convicted (which is fine), and like a child having a tantrum since you’ve been exposed you keep saying I assumed. Damn, hold that L pal.
    1
  50.  @derekwoodford9955 First is March 2024, SECOND classified documents one is set for May 20 2024. So even there you’re incorrect, TWO have set dates and this one obviously doesn’t have one given it was last week.
    1
  51.  @derekwoodford9955 what civil suits are you yammering about?
    1
  52.  @derekwoodford9955 Where are the civil suits? We aren’t even talking about those. The three indictments are CRIMINAL
    1
  53.  @derekwoodford9955 There; i exposes your lack of knowledge. Thinking he has already beaten them because he’s not in jail, calling them civil and not criminal cases, stating they don’t have criminal charges despite the 78 felony charges, the lack of ability to connect a Biden administration decision/policy to rising gas prices globally… need i continue? or is shaming a kink of yours at this point?😂
    1
  54.  @derekwoodford9955  SO WHY BRING UP CIVIL IN THE FIRST PLACE🤣🤣
    1
  55.  @derekwoodford9955  Yeah i’m sure that was your very first point that i quoted for you buddy😂 great walk back, goes to show how much you know. Thanks for trying though!
    1
  56.  @derekwoodford9955 ​​⁠You did not say this was was simply your opinion from the beginning, in fact you made it sound like the first two indictments have failed, thus you had him “beating” them🤣. You weren’t even aware they had trial dates set, and yes you did say there weren’t any criminal charges (FOR WHICH YOU NEVER BROUGHT UP PREVIOUS CASES UNTIL I PROVED OTHERWISE hence the goal post moving). And once again, idc what your opinion is, you obviously have been changing your line of argument since the beginning. Out of the summary i provided, you only acknowledge the felony issue, miss the others, including the Biden question. Nice try buddy, i’ll see you next time you decide to respond to a comment i make, rent free in your head😂
    1
  57.  @tonyg17a  you have issues man
    1
  58.  @tonyg17a  Isn’t it just
    1
  59.  @tonyg17a  My friend, you make so sense. Please check in with someone.
    1
  60.  @tonyg17a  Now you’re just creepy , you’re welcome
    1
  61.  @derekwoodford9955 Sheesh four days later and still too cowardly
    1
  62.  @derekwoodford9955 No response?
    1
  63.  @dashforcash6555  What video? Are you okay sir? I don’t think you’ve actually read it…
    1
  64.  @dashforcash6555 what disproves the facts of the indictment buddy?
    1
  65.  @Baaliwood  Than* and how so?
    1
  66.  @Baaliwood  no Russian expansion? because that’s Biden’s fault?😂 and which new foreign wars? Better economy; only the first two years of his presidency saw major improvements in the overall economy, something you cannot directly attest to Trump policies, but a spillover from the obama years and recovery from 08-09; the last year the economy did terribly, but ofc blame biden for that, right? Biden mumbles constantly, but it’s much better than the repeat ad libs and self grandiosity from Trump😂 the dude doesn’t know how to speak intelligibly.
    1
  67.  @Baaliwood  Ah yes, the news journals that ultimately have no bias and have conducted their studies… i rest my case.
    1
  68.  @Baaliwood  thanks to Joe, right? Because that’s what Bloomberg says. Thanks!
    1
  69.  @OneManJam Ahh yes, Joe notorious for his dictator tendencies… get a grip buddy😂 you’ll cry again in 2024
    1
  70.  @arkcon714  Hmmm sound an awful lot like Trump’s Ukraine call? Finding some information on an opponent? Perhaps even finding a few extra votes from a state? You ideologues have tunnel vision and think I’d excuse Biden too, which i don’t, but hey if you’d like to provide those documents g’head buddy
    1
  71.  @arkcon714  i’m talking about the phone call, not what he asked Bill Barr to do, and what Barr later admitted amounted to nothing ? and yeah, if there’s evidence that a court can prove without a doubt then yes, he should be indicted. i’m no political shill like yourself so i no i did not “walk into” anything 🤣
    1
  72.  @arkcon714  what phone call are you talking about? the one he hinted to preventing funding unless given information?😂 that wasn’t even directed at Barr you dingus. once again, you’re on the wrong alge
    1
  73.  @arkcon714  and once again, zero evidence of biden informing garland to act. that’s just cope coming from your end 🤣
    1
  74. okay so only acknowledge one point i made? and wait you’re now pointing to a media outlet as a source? please link the article title, i’ve spent the last while looking for any reporting done by them that states that Biden DIRECTED Garland to investigate Trump. Just include the article name there champ
    1
  75. ⁠ @arkcon714 Wow, three separate comments with only one of them addressing the argument, the other two on “embarrassment”😂 i think you’re reaching at this point. but hey, continue subscribing, watching, and spending your days and nights on global news’ youtube channel 🤣
    1
  76. ⁠ @arkcon714 Oh! Well there you go, even easier for you then. Which episode of the Tim Pool cast or Michael Knowles show (both hilarious sources btw😂) do they mention that? Wait that doesn’t answer my question then; he is merely telling his opinions to others? I wonder what he said about Garland creating a special counsel for the hunter biden case….
    1
  77. ⁠ @arkcon714 That’s not urging, if you really thinks that evidence of urging - or even instructing which is what i asked - than i can’t help you. Provide those video titles please
    1
  78.  @arkcon714  No, because even they don’t have evidence for that; i don’t think you realize that if there was direct evidence for this, it would be plastered all over the media INCLUDING left wing media like Global.
    1
  79.  @arkcon714 I love the goal post? Are you okay buddy? And no, i see no quotations at all. You’re referring to a NYT from March of which you won’t even provide the title of, but your excuse is that it’s behind a pay wall? Is that your admission that you pay for a left wing newspaper?😂 & if you can’t provide that, than at least provide the titles of the videos you mentioned - like the tim pool (who recently stated hawaii’s fires were started by Chinese lasers) or the second least relevant daily wire host Michael Knowles🤣
    1
  80.  @arkcon714 No i will not, you think you’re “quoting” without actually quoting or referring to actual articles. I just read a Breitbart article that says Trump pressured Barr to look into the Biden family’s business dealings - see how easy that is?😂 you’re desperate at this point; because even with you mentioning goalposts and how i love them - which is the wrong phrase buddy - you don’t even realize you’ve switched the topic over from Trump LOOOONG ago. But take another few days off, lick those wounds pal
    1
  81.  @arkcon714 Um yeah actually he did, either watch it again or perhaps you’re watching the wrong episode 😂
    1
  82.  @arkcon714 No i do not accept your vision that that had happened. Receipts buddy! And yes changing the subject is another form of whataboutism, which is a form of shifting the goal post. I rest my case; you can’t defend Trump’s actions so you resort to making up things you can’t provide evidence on😂 enjoy your monthly subscription to NYT🤣🤣
    1
  83.  @arkcon714 looks like you repeated your comments, man i’m really living rent free in your head 😂
    1
  84.  @arkcon714 ”read past the headlines” YOU WONT EVEN PROVIDE A HEADLINE AND BLAME IT ON A PAYWALL😂😂😂 oh my god the irony is hilarious with you Will you provide an article name from the March 2023 article you have apparently “quoted” from?
    1
  85.  @arkcon714 Oh okay, i’ll spell it out for you slowly then since that’s your mantra: Whataboutisms are referring to another thing (similar to a red herring) to mislead or distract someone from the topic at hand. It is inherently a DIFFERENT SUBJECT if it refers to another thing with the intent of distracting. A goal shift is when someone who has been exposed as not knowing what they’re talking about (ie, you😂) who decides to change to a different subject, or provide a whataboutism to distract from their intellectual faults 🤣🤣 Easy for you buddy?
    1
  86.  @arkcon714 Ouuuu that’s gotta burn your ego a bit
    1
  87.  @arkcon714 ​​⁠read past the headline of his video? i watched 40 min of that podcast😂
    1
  88.  @arkcon714 Rip me apart? You literally changed the definition to suit your needs of wanting to see me get owned😂 get over yourself buddy
    1
  89.  @arkcon714 Ah definitely shattered, despite my point standing still, while your favourite president has been indicted a fourth time. Why don’t you cry more😢
    1
  90.  @arkcon714  “Whataboutism is similar to the red herring fallacy1. Both techniques attempt to divert an argument from its original topic to a new one. However, while the red herring fallacy introduces a completely unrelated topic, whataboutism attempts to turn the argument’s focus to another party’s faults in order to deflect criticism from the original party being discussed1.“ Literally what I explained😂 look up the two why don’t you
    1
  91.  @arkcon714 Notice the word “similar” in my original comment as well… ooooof that’s gotta burn. But okay, keep arguing semantics, your point is obviously lost😉
    1
  92.  @arkcon714 My point still stands, no matter how many times you repeat yourself like a middle school child🤧
    1
  93.  @arkcon714 I don’t have a point? I’m sorry whose comment thread was this?🤣🤣🤣 Oh the self-awareness is not there for you…. Never said they were “the same”, but keep reaching and repeating, you’re only making a fool of yourself😂
    1
  94.  @arkcon714 I said SIMILAR TO. And yes, they are similar to one another. Clearly reading is not your strong suite.
    1
  95.  @arkcon714 Take the L? Again, my point rests. You don’t even realize what thread this is 🤣
    1
  96. Uh huh, keep arguing semantics, that’s a RED HERRING from the topic at hand. 😂 My point stands.
    1
  97.  @arkcon714 Mhmm, I don’t have a point, that’s why this thread never existed😵‍💫. God the cope is hilarious.
    1
  98. ⁠ @arkcon714 ​​⁠LOL i am factually wrong? you don’t even realize what we were arguing about 🤣🤣🤣 and yess, the piece of information (my use of certain terms and whether i know their definitions) are distracting from the original topic. SWING AND MISS there buddy
    1
  99.  @arkcon714 they are similar, but keep crying about it
    1
  100. ⁠ @arkcon714 Victory? LOL i can sense the chin rolls from ya. keep arguing semantics, my point, again, remains.
    1
  101.  @arkcon714 Not acknowledging your vehicle situation you got there, but okay. The fallacies are similar. That’s it!
    1
  102.  @arkcon714 anyone reading this would know my point from the beginning was how dictatorial Trump is, but you refuse to acknowledge it and continue to argue semantics. Sad…
    1
  103.  @arkcon714  Wow imagine there being fallacies similar to one another, must be crazy🥸
    1
  104.  @arkcon714  I can’t help you if you honestly think you defeated that, but whatever helps you sleep at night buddy🤣
    1
  105.  @arkcon714  Okay buddy, if those are your thoughts on fallacies that you feel so emotionally inclined to, so be it😂
    1