Comments by "" (@CYMotorsport) on "Recreating the Assassination Attempt On Donald Trump" video.

  1. You didn’t conclusively prove “he did try to take the shot” bc you don’t have the conditions the shot was taken. You made assumptions and based on those assumptions you proved hitting an ear would be difficult, not impossible. It’s a pretty dumb narrative regardless but throwing around words like “conclusively” re: a disaster of this magnitude this close to it happening is just weird and irresponsible. Semantics matter a tremendous amount, I think you’d agree they matter. You did not conclusively prove a motive which you can not possible know. Nor have you proven under your own assumptions anything definitive. Ironically you actually proved that dumb narrative actually could be possible. It’s more likely you wanted to make a video about the shooting. Which in context of bold statements attributing the work done in this video with “conclusive” evidence… yeah… not great optics. I like this channel, it’s cool man just say you wanted to to make a topical video about an attempted assassination. You weren’t trying to prove something conclusively or the video wouldn’t be 18 minutes long given the complexity and science of the shot not to mention the caveats, nuance, and unknown information would make any sort of ability to properly analyze this in a way to come to a conclusive finding would be outright impossible in good faith.
    1