Comments by "" (@CYMotorsport) on "Marques Brownlee" channel.

  1. The subtle boss move 2:50
    809
  2. Fantastic treat! My only add is while technically KERS is correct Because you can still harness kinetic waste energy, KERS nomenclature as many refer from the 09 era was done away with. instead we opt for the MGU-K/H system to account for the additional waste energy now available to be harnessed and deployed. Deployment of said “KERS” might instead in 2024 really be deployment of energy recovery or the ERS. Energy recovery systems are both the MGU systems: H is for “heat” and K is for “Kinetic”. It uses waste energy to top up energy recovery systems through different methods so a driver can boost performance. KERS and MGUK have in common that it’s mainly fed under brake load. But now you also have the heat recovery to add on top for a total boost of ERS. So not even a correction just layering potentially useful info on top. While the nuance added may sound at first pedantic, it’s actually a testament to the habitual advancement of the sport. No sport can innovate quite as quickly as F1 you’d be right at home falling deeper down the rabbit hole and I hope the bug bites you after seeing it first hand!
    36
  3. 1:56 The specs you are showing are not the cybertruck. Thats the cyberbeast variant. Incredibly important distinction when talking about “pickup trucks”. The cyberbeast excludes the rollout in those performance figures. When you make it a spec base all wheel drive, it gets 58% slower to 60mph to 4.1 and loses ~20mph and 20 miles in range. It’s a different vehicle as it relates to raw performance . The quad motor AWD Rivian still smashes the proper pick up load out cybertruck with the rollout included by nearly a second. The dual motor Rivian 0-60 performance is also better than the cybertruck with its rollout.
    2
  4. If this is about Fiskar, don’t sweat it. Ppl do not understand earnings reports. All Due respect the stock was moving irrelevant to you. What their 10k said and reported financials spelled out made everything , including your video, insignificant. Anyone saying otherwise has never worked in that business. I’ve sat on those desks. In the credit analyst meetings. The last thing that would ever come up is a YouTube review. I promise. The equities side moved perfectly in line with earnings.
    1
  5. Fastest accelerating car - important distinction. But regardless this is absolutely not a production car IMO. Kind of ridiculous they’d even try to say that. In my eyes I still give this to the SRT Demon which was 4.8% quicker nought to 60 - caveat being it used Mickey Thompson radials. I mean that’s basically slicks at that point. The Rimac was indeed on Michelin cups on an unprepared surface. The other caveat is static-to-speed records are kinda pointless. The aero is what a consumer likely cares about re: performance. Or even the 60-0 performance which I personally wasn’t too impressed by with Rimac. It’s still a ridiculously impressive accomplishment that team was able to create and the machine is gorgeous. Just calling a 2 million car a production car really rubs me the wrong way.
    1
  6. Did you just subtle flex the Jordan 1 Retro Banned 0:53 CHEEKY!
    1
  7. You know exactly what you’re doing with that title lol ya goofball. Enjoy your week competing though that’s dope
    1