Comments by "" (@CYMotorsport) on "Something TERRIFYING Happened To Them In Siberian Mountains" video.

  1. Your mountaineering experience doesn’t qualify you to opine with authority on air freezing in your airways though you can speak anecdotally to the cold you felt internally. Did you measure this when it occurred to yourself? What were the circumstances? What mountaineering have you done in a few words and is it similar to the scenario depicted here? If not, how does that difference add credibility to what you’re saying? Not rhetorical , I think it can but need to know that before trusting the words after you establish yourself an experienced voice on the matter. I(we) don’t know and want to take that at face value but you’ve not provided information. I say all that bc I’m studying the effects mentioned here and physiologically it’s illogical is the most gentle way I can put it. Your description has more plausible elements but how she recounts her story, I don’t think you were co-signing persay which makes sense. You said “feels” like and that I think that is perfectly reasonable. But medically speaking, sir it’s literally impossible unless EXTREME situation arises. Your lungs are literally encased entirely within your thoracic. You have an entire respiratory system that humidifies air before reaching your lungs. This could come down to what you mean by “crystallize” but taking it literally there’s a 0.001% this could occur in the presented scenarios. Again, that’s being generous. You would die LONG before this would be observed from hypothermia if “air was frozen in your airways” you said you could speak to. The very fact you’re coughing up blood in a consistent viscosity that was deemed normal is literally proof your ways aren’t frozen. Your lungs are heated by that same blood circulating which you claim you have also coughed. This circumstance with respect to the blood especially did not happen here whereby it can be attributed to frozen air in the airways. That doesn’t mean it’s some nerve agent. Though I think you are understandably trying to make sense of a situation that maybe didn’t occur as depicted but that wouldn’t be your fault. Like I said, it can be realistic for it to FEEL air is frozen in your airways. But that will not make you overheat and the two aren’t (can’t be) linked. Paradoxical undressing in another set of clinically understudied circumstances that may or may not apply here. But the concept of simply feeling “overheated” as you mention without the accompanying dubbed “terminal burrowing” behavior is fairly rare as most cases where it’s an accepted explanation that led to a death include the change in brain stem and body chemistry with the undressed deceased individual burrowed behind objects in cases where they are recovered or did not fall to their death. We just see the latter cases in movies of mountain climbers who are mid climb. But it happens mostly on open land atleast scientifically documented cases we can speak to with confidence. There’s no observable phenomena in any peer reviewed journal of a survivor having been confirmed to experience a provable or atleast documented feeling of “overheating” with no other action taken that would qualify the event as “paradoxical” in the first place. Meaning, if you say you’re hot when it’s cold and you do nothing, that doesn’t medically mean much. Atleast nothing of note. It’s strange, could be placebo, could be suggestive. But certainly doesn’t prove anything. Net, taking the words literally, air does not freeze in airways of a person still conscious and breathing with any amount of faculties especially with circulating blood. And these circumstances described it happened to nearly every person actually would almost suggest strongly on its own there’s another factor as independently that’s a near impossibility for medical defying symptoms to present in an organized way like this. I believe you when you said it feels like your air is frozen. But it’s physically not possible. And thus the blood is not a symptom of that impossibility. The point isn’t to object to YOUR statements sir, all due respect. The point is to object the original story’s sequence of events. Not malice implied on the original story as I believe whatever happened was tragic but this was likely not what happened, and that last part is definitely in my opinion if it ever had to be stated clearly. If we part ways with her narrative, and go with the more reasonable autopsies which aren’t even noteworthy enough to consider conspiracies, the scenario gets FAR more believable. Basically, if we pretend this account of the lone survivor as an exercise in thought simply doesn’t exist, nothing terribly strange occurred. Though bodies were in partial disrobed states, it’s not necessarily paradoxically undressing instances. There were other factors that made this conclusion valid. But it was described credibly in my opinion as being death by hypothermia or some cases starvation/exposure. The implications of that are gruesome of course but again if again as a thought exercise assume that’s true, we also have a plethora of studied incidents where as a defense mechanism our brains concoct a story which we are able to cope with the reality of our survival in a very abnormal brain processing event and variation of survivors guilt. Where it can be objectively proven what we think happen can be in good faith but not even be close to accurate. There’s a very very complex hierarchy in literally with many paths ranging from aforementioned survivors guilt to defensive omnipotent phantasy. The non-depressive defensive categories are of interest to me here as they are hard to apply to life and death scenarios. One highly theorized incident is that of Luttrell’s survival in the Korangal Valley as there’s quite a bit of evidence of things not being quite as they are popularly depicted and I’m not talking in cinema. I’m not saying I believe that but that is another scenario of survival but on more related note, there’s a less popular but equally interesting accounts from the hyper confusing 2008 k2 incident particularly of the story from Confortola. It’s an uncomfortable reality we have to consider these scenarios but they are apart of human survival and how our brains operate. Is it possible that story about head bashing which wasn’t observed along with blood just spontaneously extracted, which also was inconstant with the established state of the bodies, was true? Meaning the autopsies were outright falsified? Yes, that’s possible. But for what motive? And what evidence supports that specifically? Or is it also possible as a defense mechanism to cope with needing to potentially abandon a hiking expedition in a life and death situation to survive the human brain created a narrative that made this an acceptable outcome? Not that I’m commenting in any way on whether that’s “right or wrong” just what’s possible. All I can say is it’s not a psychological impossibility.
    1