Comments by "" (@CYMotorsport) on "Graham Hancock’s Theory about Ancient Civilizations | Joe Rogan" video.

2:35 is it really that hard? Thousands of Skilled laborers dedicating half a lifetime specifically to one task working uninterrupted.
58
@marcovela4074 why would there be millions of hammers? The tomb was essentially a shrine dedicated to the pharaohs made by men who were trained to build. You don’t think they cleaned up after themselves? Again, I’m not saying what I’m saying makes MORE sense just to move from the most plausible, we have to thoroughly debunk these assumptions. And the ramp would indeed need to be bigger. But I’ve never understood this objection . If they are capable of complex calculus that leads to perfect design, you don’t think they can collectively build a simple ramp? Yes the heigh is impressive but the real objection I can’t get my head around is the mass of these objects in conjunction with the height. But that still falls in the realm of if they had a solution to create this, they hen you combine resources and brain power I don’t see how wouldn’t be able to construct an efficient mechanism over 2 decades. It’s all mechanical construction and maths mind you. We’re not talking the cosmos or science that wasn’t available. So why wouldn’t you assume they gathered the top builders they could get. Imagine if we did that today and didn’t use modern technology but had Elon, Gates, etc etc you get the point. Plus thousands and thousand of others like them all making this. I mean, it’s a goofy thought experiment but you think that’s SO crazy? It’s a wonder of the world. Incredible mechanical engineering. But impossible? I don’t see why. But I’m 100% aware I could be insanely wrong haha
11
@alihakam697 like what, specifically ? I’d have to disagree that apart from the shear scale of the effort it’s so mysterious but of course I’m open to that. Which part of the construction can’t be explained by ingenuity and man hours? What is beyond the scope of reason when you factor in that volume of skilled work dedicated to one single task for decades ?
6
@marcovela4074 this is a common myth easily debunked with a little research so don’t believe me just look into arguably the most accomplished Egyptologist Dr. Lepsius. Also you say “techniques unbeknownst to us”. Do you have evidence of this claim? How are you making such strong and bold claims without citing proof? You yourself recognize the loss of information over time. So is it possible you or I don’t know it’s a 100% fact that we know the elaborate Pyramid structure snd procedures? You yourself also think it’s so great a feat that technologies beyond us built it. Yet ironically you say bc we can’t locate an actual tomb it’s proof positive of something. Mate if they built this extravagant structure, why would you assume non-Egyptologists like us could wrap our head around where a pharaoh could be? It’s entirely possible that’s the case but the most well respected researchers even when recognizing issues with the pyramids note the overwhelming sense ways it does conform. So to bring it all back, if your theory hinged on no hieroglyphs… well it looks like you have new info to add to your Arsenal to expand your theory to fit more of the facts.
6
Cindy Ramos I beg you haha correct me. In fact, I wouldn’t call it correcting me at all. We’re both just curious and both seem to be open that we don’t have the answers. So In a way we’re on the same team! I still fail to see why there would be large amounts of tools. If we assume this is a sacred tomb, I don’t think things would be littered. If we make numerous assumptions eg they made a ramp larger than the structure itself, it’s safe to assume they would be pulling out all the stops. Seems silly as a builder to just leave your tool after all that. Do we see loads of tools around construction today? It’s possible. I am a dumb dumb when it comes to that. But I’ve never seen or found a random tool at a building let alone a sacred site. To be fair, I haven’t visited many haha. Just as I see it, which means absolutely nothing, this still comes down to simple computation. Exhaustive, but doable. . Even I can understand the Pythagorean snd trigonometry. This plus MASSIVE man hours can account for the structure. However what I don’t know is this: is there an element to the construction BESIDE shear scale, that can’t be accounted for? I spent a long time stumped on the maths then did a lot to understand the history and discovery of Plimpton 322. So it’s 100% verifiable they had the maths. Babylonian calculation was indeed sophisticated. But I’m not at all versed on anything beyond this that is out of place. Maybe a room contains evidence of some science used not “discovered” until later? That’s what I’m desperate for so I’m open to anything and just some curious person. I assume I’m wrong in fact haha
2