Youtube comments of Cloud Dragon Arts (@JulianaAndersson).
-
67
-
32
-
30
-
30
-
27
-
22
-
10
-
10
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
How come the para Olympics are not a part of this conversation. Para or Special Olympian can not compete against normal able bodied humans… they have their own Olympics Event… and they don’t complain about that… they are legit Olympics… but the unfair advantages are recognized. Why can’t there be a Trans Olympics? Maybe because the numbers are so small as to be almost non existent…. And it could not support itself as an Olympics… Trans women are not female sex. If they were, they would understand. Notice how it’s never trans men that are vocal about this… cause the men’s categories are actually not a thing. They are the OPEN category where literally anyone can compete. Men, women, para, etc… just not everyone can win by entering those competitions…. And that’s the key here… women, trans women, para competitors want at least a realistic chance at winning something… trans women want to WIN… and the only way they can do that is to enter the female only competitive realms…
One thing needs to be said here and that’s men are men from birth. Puberty only enhances and matured what is already there… every parent in any part of the world will tell you that, even with large variation, boys are different from girls. In how they think, how they play, energy levels and how they interact with others. There is a difference from birth, not just puberty.
Trans should have its own category… and I can almost predict the outcomes between trans males and trans females competing… will they need two separate categories for competition?
As they so boldly state:
GENDER IS A (false) CONSTRUCT OF SOCIETY… they mean it to be in their favor, to identify how they want, but it can also mean that it is something that is “made up” by an individual about themselves to suit their whimsical “needs”…
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Why stay within the last 500 years? When you say “Black Civilization” do you mean in Africa? Also, what are the criteria for “successful”? Cause there are hundreds of societies and tribes that have survived for thousands of years to present day. That is one thing I would consider “successful” in criteria, to last for multiple millennia. Take Ethiopia. Also, the last 500 years has seen the colonization of Africa which has disrupted and destroyed the previous African cultures and civilizations, diverting them from practicing their lifestyle fully.
Since we are probably talking Africa, should we even mention North Africa? I mean, can anyone really top the Egyptians when it comes to building highly advanced, artistic and massive stone structures?
Who are we comparing this successful civilization to? And in what time period? Cause that really makes a difference.
If you are defining the term civilization as something like we have in America in modern times, just know that archeologists don’t really use that word anymore because it is highly ambiguous, prejudicial to non conforming societies and just plain outdated (in a racist sorta way). Historically, it was used against many societies and peoples as a justification for colonization, slavery, racism, and assimilation into Christian European cultural standards.
I think you should stop using informal fallacies (mistakes in reasoning) and cognitive biases to construct your arguments. Also, learning some anthropology or archeology would be useful to shine a light on your cognitive distortions.
But this is probably way more than you wanted to argue. You just wanted to say black people are incompetent without actually saying black people are incompetent. To address this, there is a direct correlation between the incompetence of black euro-style civilizations to the European colonizers who changed the pre-existing societal structure, many times relocated, then converted, dominated, enslaved, killed, undermined, and finally abandoned (like with Haiti) them. I think any European people who had the same global societal pressures would also look disorganized to the person who comes from the colonizers society. IMHO
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1